HomeMy WebLinkAboutR04-096 Fox Hollow PUD Sketch Plan Approvaly � �
• Commissioner moved adoption
of the ollowing Resolution:
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO
RESOLUTION NO. 2004 -
APPROVAL
OF THE FOX HOLLOW PUD
SKETCH PLAN
FILE NO. PDS -00040
WHEREAS, on or about April 23`d, 2004, the County of Eagle, State of Colorado,
accepted for filing an application submitted by Evelyn Pinney and Robert Levine (hereinafter
"Applicants ") for approval of a Planned Unit Development Sketch Plan for the Fox Hollow
• Planned Unit Development, File Nos. PDS- 00040; and,
WHEREAS, the Applicants requested the approval of a PUD Sketch Plan which would
allow the creation of a mixed use PUD which is comprised of a maximum of 26 residences
consisting of eight (8) duplexes and two (2) four - plexes, two employee housing units (above
commercial space) and approximately 28,000 sq feet of neighborhood commercial space.
WHEREAS, the development is proposed to built on 4.53 acres in west Edwards; and,
WHEREAS, Fox Hollow is situated on two of the three lots and parcels which formally
comprised a subdivision known as the Woodland Hills Planned Unit Development (see attached
Exhibit `A'); and,
WHEREAS, notice of the PUD Sketch Plan were given to all proper agencies and
departments as required by the Eagle County Land Use Regulations, Section 5- 210.E; and,
WHEREAS, at its public hearing(s) held June 30th, 2004 the Eagle County Planning
Commission, based upon its findings, recommended approval with conditions, of the proposed
PUD Sketch Plan; and,
• Page 1 of 7
889979
Page:
Teak J Simonton Eaqle CO
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII ,IIIIIIII!IIIIIIII
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by the Board of County Commissioners
(hereinafter "the Board ") of the County of Eagle, State of Colorado, on July 60', 2004 to consider
this PUD Sketch Plan application; and,
WHEREAS, based on the evidence, testimony, exhibits, and study of the Master Plan for
the unincorporated areas of Eagle County, comments of the Eagle County Department of
Community Development, comments of public officials and agencies, the recommendation of the
Planning Commission, and comments from all interested parties, the Board of County
Commissioners of the County of Eagle, State of Colorado, finds as follows:
1. That proper publication and public notice was provided as required by law for the
hearings before the Planning Commission and the Board.
2. Pursuant to Eagle County Land Use Regulations Section 5- 240.F.3.e. Standards for
the review of a Sketch and Preliminary Plan for PUD:
(1) Unified ownership or control. The title to all land that is part of this PUD IS
owned or controlled by one (1) person and/or entity.
(2) Uses. The uses that may be developed in the PUD ARE uses that are designated
as uses that are allowed, allowed as a special use or allowed as a limited use in
either Table 3 -320, "Commercial and Industrial Zone Districts Use Schedule" or
Table 3 -300, 'Residential, Agricultural and Resource Zone Districts Use
Schedule ". The residential uses ARE uses allowed in the currently governing
Woodland Hills PUD; however, the commercial uses ARE NOT currently
permitted in the underlying zone district.
(3) Dimensional Limitations. The dimensional limitations that shall apply to the
PUD ARE NOT those specified in the existing Planned Unit Development Guide
for these properties; however, this finding may be found positive assuming
approval of the Variations by the Board of County Commissioners at Preliminary
Plan.
(4) Off - Street Parking and Loading. Given the Sketch Plan level detail of the
development plan, it is likely that the applicants WILL be able to demonstrate
that off - street parking and loading provided in the PUD CAN comply with the
standards of Article 4, Division 1, Off -Street Parking and Loading Standards,
without a necessity for a reduction in the standards, at Preliminary Plan.
(5) Landscaping. It WILL be demonstrated that landscaping provided in the PUD
can comply with the standards of Article 4, Division 2, Landscaping and
Illumination Standards. Illumination standards must be considered as part of
Page 2 of 7
Preliminary Plan.
(6) Signs. The sign standards applicable to the PUD ARE as specified in Article 4,
Division 3, Sign, Regulations. The PUD guide properly references that signs shall
be as allowed pursuant to the Eagle County Land Use Regulations. A
Comprehensive Sign Plan is required to be submitted with the Preliminary Plan
application.
(7) Adequate Facilities. The Applicant HAS NOT clearly demonstrated that the
development proposed in this Sketch Plan for PUD will be provided adequate
facilities for solid waste disposal and roads. Further the applicant HAS NOT
clearly demonstrated that the development proposed in the Sketch Plan for PUD
will be provided adequate facilities for potable water and sewage disposal. It
HAS demonstrated that the proposed PUD will be conveniently located in relation
to schools, police and fire protection, and emergency medical services.
(8) Improvements It HAS NOT been clearly demonstrated that the improvements
standards applicable to the development will be as specified in Article 4, Division
6, Improvements Standards regarding:
(a) Safe, Efficient Access.
(b) Internal Pathways.
(c) Emergency Vehicles
(d) Principal Access Points.
(e) Snow Storage
However, it WILL be demonstrated as part of the Preliminary Plan.
(9) Compatibility with Surrounding Land Uses. The development proposed for the
PUD IS compatible with the character of surrounding land uses.
(10) Consistent with Master Plan. The proposed Sketch is not entirely consistent with
all stated purposes, goals, objectives and policies of applicable master plans,
primarily because none of the recreational or open space areas are reserved with
this application aside from two (2) tot lots (only one is shown on the development
plan), and "open space" areas around buildings and parking lots. The application
does include potentially beneficial uses for the West Edwards vicinity.
(11) Phasing. A phasing plan IS necessary for this development, and shall be included
with the Preliminary Plan.
(12) Common Recreation and Open Space. The PUD HAS NOT demonstrated that
the proposed development will comply with the common recreation and open
space standards with respect to:
(a) Minimum area;
(b) Improvements required;
Page 3 of 7
(c) Continuing use and maintenance; or
(d) Organization.
The Board of County Commissioners may find that 25% common open space
would not further benefit this project.
(13) Natural Resource Protection. The PUD DOES demonstrate that the
recommendations made by the applicable analysis documents available at the time
the application was submitted, as well as the recommendations of referral
agencies as specified in Article 4, Division 4, Natural Resource Protection
Standards, have been considered.
3. Pursuant to Eagle County Land Use Regulations Section 5- 280.B.3.e. Standards for
the review of a Sketch Plan for Subdivision:
(1) Consistency with Master Plan. The PUD IS consistent with the Master Plan,
and it IS consistent with the Future Land Use Map (FLUM).
(2) Consistency with Land Use Regulations. The Applicant HAS fully
demonstrated that the proposed subdivision complies with all of the standards of
this Section and all other provisions of these Land Use Regulations, including, but
not limited to, the applicable standards of Article 3, Zone Districts, and Article 4,
Site Development Standards.
(3) Spatial Pattern Shall Be Efficient. The proposed subdivision IS located and
designed to avoid creating spatial patterns that cause inefficiencies in the delivery
of public services, or require duplication or premature extension of public
facilities, or result in a "leapfrog" pattern of development.
(a) Utility and Road Extension: Proposed utility extensions ARE consistent
with the utility's service plan or that County approval of a service plan
amendment will be given; or that road extensions are consistent with the
Eagle County Road Cgpital Improvements Plan.
(b) Serve Ultimate Population: Utility lines WILL be sized to serve the
planned ultimate population of the service area to avoid future land
disruption to upgrade under -sized lines.
(c) Coordinate Utility Extensions: The entire range of necessary facilities
CAN be provided, rather than incrementally extending a single service
into an otherwise un- served area.
(4) Suitability for Development. The property proposed to be subdivided IS
suitable for development.
Page 4 of 7
(5) Compatibility with Surrounding Uses. The proposed subdivision IS
compatible with the character of existing land uses in the area and SHALL NOT
adversely affect the future development of the surrounding area.
4. Other. Pursuant to Section 5- 240.F.2.a.(15).(a), which states:
(15) Any or all of the following requirements, as determined by the Community
Development Director, based on the complexity of the proposal:
(a) Supporting data to justify any proposed commercial and industrial elements
in an area not so zoned. The applicant HAS validated these uses.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of
the County of Eagle, State of Colorado:
THAT, the PUD Sketch Plan for Edwards Storage Facility File No. PDS -00040 be and is
hereby approved with the following conditions:
Except as otherwise modified by this Permit, all material representations made by
the Applicant in this application and in public meeting shall be adhered to and
considered conditions of approval.
2. The buildings should utilize finish materials and colors designed to "blend" in
with the surrounding landscape, prohibiting bright finish colors.
3. `Ability to Serve' from the Eagle River Water and Sanitation District (the District)
must be provided with the Preliminary Plan application.
4. Pursuant to the memo from the Eagle River Fire Protection District, dated May
30, 2004, a site plan showing adequate accessibility and turn -a- rounds for
emergency vehicles must be provided with the Preliminary Plan application.
All comments pursuant to the Engineering Memo, dated June 3rd, 2004 must be
adhered to with comments numbered 1 -3 satisfied prior to Preliminary Plan
application.
6. A Comprehensive Sign Plan shall be developed and submitted as part of the
Preliminary Plan application.
7. A site specific parking plan shall be developed and submitted as part of the
Preliminary Plan application.
8. A detailed landscaping plan is required to be submitted as part of the Preliminary
Plan application.
Page 5 of 7
MOVED, READ AND ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissione of the
County of Eagle, State of Colorado, at its regular meeting held this � day of C
2004, nunc pro tunc to the 6h day of July, 2004.
ATTEST:
I
Teak J. Simonton
Clerk to the Board of
County Commissioners
COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO, By and
AAA
g BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
�) BY:
M.
C
41 w
1.14 02
I �G
Gallagher, Co 'I
emu- `ice
Commissione onded adoption of the foregoing resolution. The roll having
been called, the vote was a follows:
Commissioner Tom C. Stone
Commissioner Michael L. Gallagher
Commissioner Am M. Menconi
This Resolution passed by -- --�-3 vote of the Board of County Commissioner of the
County of Eagle, State of Colorado.
Page 7 of 7
42,
Lake Creek Alpts
1-77
-ERVMHP
. . . . . . . . . . .
SITE
Tv,
ow: W
West Edwards
