HomeMy WebLinkAboutR07-069 Colorado River Ranch Property Zone Change Commissioner ~~~U>1moved adoption of the following Resolution: BOARD OF EAGLE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO RESOLUTION NO. 2007- ['":({/) APPROVAL OF A COUNTY INITIATED ZONE CHANGE FOR THE COLORADO RIVER RANCH PROPERTY TO RESTORE 'RESOURCE' ZONING FILE NO. ZC-00085 WHEREAS, on May 8,2001 the Board of County Commissioners adopted :Resolution No. 2001-067 approving a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Preliminary Plan application for the Colorado River Ranch PUD, Eagle County File No. PDP-00018. This PUD Preliminary Plan approval was valid for five years; and WHEREAS, on February 8, 2006 the Board of County Commissioners was petitioned by the current owner of the Colorado River Ranch property with a request to extend the Preliminary Plan approval for an additional two years beyond the expiration of the initial five year validity; and WHEREAS, on March 28, 2006 following a public hearing on the request held on March 14, 2006, the Board of County Commissioners, via Resolution No. 2006-032, denied the request for extension; and WHEREAS, in accordance with the Eagle County Land Use Regulations, the Board of County Commissioners initiated a hearing to determine whether to extinguish the PUD Preliminary Plan. On October 23, 2006, the Community Development Department Director notified the property owner of a hearing before an appointed hearing officer to occur on Thursday, November 30, 2006; and WHEREAS, on November 29, 2006, the property owner notified the County Attorney that his client did not wish to proceed with the hearing and waived its right to such a hearing and would not contest further the action of the Board of County Commissioners in refusing to grant a two year extension of the PUD Preliminary Plan; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners at its hearing on February 6, 2007 formally determined that the applicant failed to make the required showing necessary to extend the PUD Preliminary Plan and found that said plan should be extinguished for that reason, and by Resolution dated February 20, 2007, formally terminated the Planned Unit Development Preliminary Plan. Page 1 of 9 WHEREAS, on or about March 16, 2007, the County of Eagle, State of Colorado, initiated an application to re-zone the herein described property in Eagle County from the Planned Unit Development [PUD] Zone District to the Resource [R] Zone District, Eagle County File No. ZC- 00085; and WHEREAS, at its public hearing held on May 16, 2007 the Eagle County Planning Commission, based on its findings, recommended approval ofthe proposed Zone Change from PUD to Resource; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by the Board of County Commissioners (hereinafter the "Board") of the County of Eagle, State of Colorado, on May 29,2007; and WHEREFOR, based on the evidence, testimony, exhibits, and study ofthe C.omprehensive Plan for the unincorporated areas of Eagle County, comments of the Eagle County bepartment of Community Development, comments of public officials and agencies, the recommendation of the Planning Commission, and comments from all interested parties, the Board of County Commissioners of the County of Eagle, State of Colorado, finds as follows: That proper publication and public notice were provided as required by law for hearings before the Planning Commission and the Board; and, Pursuant to Eagle County Land Use Regulations, Section 5-230.D. Standards for a Zone Change: STANDARD: Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan. [Section 5-230.D.l] Does the proposed amendment consider the purposes and intents of the Comprehensive Plan, all ancillary County adopted Specialty and Community Plan documents, and is it consistent with all relevant goals, policies, implementation strategies and Future Land Use Map designations including but not necessarily limited to the following: Section 3.2 General Development Policies a, c, e, f, g, h, i and k · Policy 'a' states that, "Those attributes that support quality oflife options unique to Eagle County today should be preserved for future generations". This proposal to restore 'Resource' zoning on the subject property satisfies this policy. · Policy 'c' states that, "Growth should be managed toward future sustainability - a healthy balance between economic success, quality of life and the preservation of the environment". Not applicable. · Policy 'e' states tha~, "Urban and suburban type growth should be appropriately designed and should be located within or immediately contiguous to existing towns and community centers". This proposal to restore 'Resource' zoning on the subject property satisfies this policy. Page 2 of 9 . Policy 'f' states that, "New communities proposed for unincorporated areas of the County should be subject to a thorough and rigorous set of development criteria", Not applicable. Policy 'g' states that, "Redevelopment and/or revitalization of currently underdeveloped, outdated, rundown, or otherwise dysfunctional areas should be encourages", Not applicable. Policy 'h' states that, "Open corridors between towns and community centers should be preserved". Not applicable. Policy 'i' states that, "A cluster style of development should be encouraged, especially in areas where cultural, environmental or scenic resources at risk". Not applicable. Policy 'k' states that, "Local communities should establish unique venues, . attractions and design standards directed toward enhancing individual community character and developing a sense of place". Not applicable. . . . . Section 3.3 Economic Resources Policies b, c, d, e, f, h, j,_ m and 0 · Policy 'b' states that, "A healthy, attractive business environment, appropriate to the area's character and resources, should be fostered". Not applicable. · Policy 'c' states that, "Those qualities that make Eag1eCounty a world class tourist destination and a great place to live, work and play should be identified, promoted and protected". This proposal to restore 'Resource J zoning on the subject property satisfies this policy. · Policy 'd' states that, "The potential impacts of second-home ownership and an aging resident population in Eagle County should be identified and_ incorporated into the decision making process". Not applicable. · Policy 'e' states that, "Commercial development should occur at a pace commensurate to growth in Eagle County". Not applicable. · Policy 'f' states that, "Commercial uses should be appropriately scaled and should be located within towns and community centers". Not applicable. · Policy 'h' states that, "Commercial development should fit a regional economic structure that promotes a coherent regional 'community' while respecting sub-area character and identity". Not applicable. · Policy 'j' states that, "Agricultural land uses should be retained to preserve Eagle County's historical heritage and scenic quality for the benefit of future generations", This proposal to restore 'Resource' zoning on the subject property satisfies this policy. · Policy 'k' states that, "Timber harvesting and mining should be recognized as viable economic activities, so long as negative social, cultural and environmental impacts are appropriately mitigated", Not applicable. · Policy 'm' states that, "Economic infrastructure should be planned for in advance, and should be adequate to support existing and future business needs", Not applicable. Page 3 of 9 . Policy '0' states that, "Future economic development in Eagle County should center on the area's existing amenities while encouraging new knowledge and technology based enterprises". Not applicable. Section 3.4 Housin2 Policies a, d, e, g and n · Policy 'a' states that, "Affordable workforce housing should be located near job centers". Not applicable. · Policy 'd' states that, "Efforts to increase the stock of affordable rental units for local workers should be supported", Not applicable. · Policy 'e' states that, "Adequate housing options for Senior Citizens should be available". Not applicable. · Policy' g' states that, "Well designed mobile home subdivisions, modular home subdivisions and mobile home parks should be encouraged where appropriate". Not applicable. · Policy 'n' states that, "Development should share responsibilityJor fulfilling Eagle County's workforce housing needs". Not applicable. Section 3.5 Infrastructure and Services Policies a, c, g, i, j, k, m and 0 · Policy 'a' states that, "Developed areas in Eagle County should be served by multiple modes oftransportation", Not applicable. · Policy 'c' states that, "Residential neighborhoods should include an appropriate mix of community services and community centered retail spaces that can be accessed by alternative modes of transportation", Not applicable. · Policy 'g' states that, "Eagle County should be adequately and efficiently served by mass transportation systems and facilities", Not applicable. · Policy 'i' states that, "Exemplary emergency and community services should be available to all residents, visitors and second home owners", Not applicable. · Policy 'j' states that, "The management and distribution of recreation areas and facilities in Eagle County should be implemented in an environmentally conscientious manner". Not applicable. · Policy 'k' states that, "Adequate and efficient infrastructure should exist within community centers and suburban neighborhoods for the delivery of domestic drinking water and for the treatment of domestic sewage", Not applicable. · Policy 'm' states that, "Communication infrastructure should be sufficient to support all anticipated needs in Eagle County", Not applicable. · Policy '0' states that, "The service and infrastructure needs of all socio- economic, age and cultural groups present in Eagle County should be fully addressed". Not applicable. Section 3.6 Water Resources Policies a, b, c, d, e, f, g, hand i · Policy 'a' states that, "The long term viability of both ground and surface water sources should be protected". Not applicable. Page 4 of 9 · Policy 'b' states that, "Minimum in-stream flows should be maintained and efforts to establish optimum in-stream flow standards in Eagle County should be supported". Not applicable. · Policy 'c' states that, "Water conservation efforts by all water users in Eagle County should be implemented", Not applicable. · Policy 'd' states that, "New water diversions and water storage projects should result in positive impacts to Eagle County's economy and environmental quality". Not applicable. · Policy 'e' states that, "Collaborative efforts on regional land and water use planning efforts to address future growth, water supply, and stream flow protection should be encouraged". Not applicable. · Policy 'f' states that, "Water quality in Eagle County should meet the highest applicable standards", Not applicable. - · Policy' g' states that, "Surface and groundwater supplies should pe protected from agricultural, industrial and development related impacts". Not applicable. · Policy 'h' states that, "Aquatic and riparian habitats should be protected from agricultural, industrial and development related impacts", Not applicable. · Policy 'i' states that, "Water-related recreation should be encouraged where appropriate at a level that will not damage related resources, ecosystems and environments". Not applicable. Section 3.7 Wildlife Resources Policies a, b, c, d, e, f and i · Policy 'a' states that, "The integrity, quality and interconnected nature_of critical wildlife habitat in Eagle County should be preserved", This proposal to restore 'Resource' zoning on the subject property satisfies this policy. · Policy 'b' states that, "The well-being of wildlife species of economic importance should be actively monitored and protected", Not applicable. · Policy 'c' states that, "The well-being of wildlife species ofless economic importance and those on the rare and endangered species list should be actively monitored and protected. Not applicable. · Policy 'd' states that, "Development in areas critical to the continued well being of Eagle County's wildlife populations should not be allowed". Not applicable. · Policy 'e' states that, "Where disturbances to wildlife habitat cannot be avoided, development should be required to fully mitigate potential negative impacts". Not applicable. · Policy 'f' states that, "Broad development patterns and the cumulative impacts of incremental development on wildlife habitat and wildlife populations should be accounted for in the decision making process". Not applicable. · Policy 'i' states that, "Access to public lands and opportunities for public land recreation should be balanced with the need to preserve quality wildlife habitat". Not applicable, Page 5 of 9 Section 3.8 Sensitive Lands Policies a, c, e and g · Policy 'a' states that, "Development should avoid areas of significant natural hazard", Not applicable. · Policy 'b' states that, "The mitigation of natural hazards should be done in a manner that protects the integrity of the natural environment and the visual quality of the area", Not applicable. · Policy 'c' states that, "Development and development patterns should preserve landscapes that include visual, historic and archeological value". This proposal to restore 'Resource' zoning on the subject property satisfies this policy. · Policy 'e' states that, "A variety of approaches should be utilized preserve land as open space", Not applicable. · Policy' g' states that, "Appropriate access should be provided to public lands and rivers", Not applicable. Section 3.9 Environmental Quality Policies a, c and d _ · Policy 'a' states that, "Air quality should meet the highest applicable safety standards, as well as the aesthetic expectations oflocal residents", Not applicable. · Policy 'c' states that, "Noise should be minimized to meet the highest applicable safety standards, as well as the aesthetic expectations of local residents", Not applicable. · Policy 'd' states that, "Energy efficiency and the reduction of overall energy consumption should be a primary goal for future operations and developments in Eagle County", Not applicable. Section 3.10 Future Land Use Map Policy a · Policy 'a' states that, "Zone changes and site-specific land use proposals should reflect the written policies of this Comprehensive Plan, the land use designations of the Future Land Use Map and the goals and objectives set forth within Area Community Plans, as applicable". Section 4 Adopted Area Community Plans All relevant goals, policies and FL UM designations . The Future Land Use Map identifies the subject property as appropriate for 'Rural' development. This proposal to restore 'Resource' zoning on the subject property satisfies this policy. Additionally, all relevant goals & policies of the following plans or such equivalent plans and/or future plans, which may be in effect at the time of application for zone change: Eagle County Open Space Plan Eagle River Watershed Plan Page 6 of 9 Eagle Valley Regional Trails Plan Eagle County Trails Plan (Roaring Fork) Eagle County Comprehensive Housing Plan Eagle County Airport Sub-Area Master Plan EXCEEDS MINIMUM STANDARDS X MEETS MINIMUM STANDARDS MEETS THE MAJORITY OF MINIMUM STANDARDS DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM STANDARDS NOT APPLICABLE STANDARD: Compatible with Surrounding Uses. [Section 5-230.D.2] Does .the proposal provide compatibility with the type, intensity, character and scale 'of existing and permissible land uses surrounding the subject property? Dimensional limitations of the proposed zone district, when applied, should result in development that will be harmonious with the physical character of existing neighborhood(s) surrounding the subject property. The proposed zone change to restore 'Resource' zoning upon the subject property is compatible with the type, intensity, character and scale of existing and permissible land uses surrounding the subject property. All surrounding lands are also zoned Resource. EXCEEDS MINIMUM STANDARDS X MEETS MINIMUM STANDARDS MEETS THE MAJORITY OF MINIMUM STANDARDS DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM STANDARDS NOT APPLICABLE STANDARD: Public Benefit. [Section 5-230.D.3] Does the proposal address a demonstrated community need or otherwise result in one or more particular public benefits that offset the impacts of the proposed uses requested, including but not limited to: Affordable local resident housing; childcare facilities; multi-modal transportation, public recreational opportunities; infrastructure improvements; preservation of agriculture/sensitive lands. This proposal to restore the 'Resource' zoning upon the subject property will preserve agriculttrrallands in a rural region of the county. D EXCEEDS MINIMUM STANDARDS [K] MEETS MINIMUM STANDARDS Page 7 of 9 U MEETS THE MAJORITY OF MINIMUM STANDARDS DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM STANDARDS NOT APPLICABLE STANDARD: Change of Circumstances. [Section 5-230.D.4] Does the proposal address or respond to a beneficial material change that has occurred to the immediate neighborhood or to the greater Eagle County community? The proposal addresses and responds to a beneficial material change of land use when the PUD Preliminary Plan for the Colorado River Ranch was extinguished by the Board of County Commissioners. EXCEEDS MINIMUM STANDARDS X MEETS MINIMUM STANDARDS MEETS THE MAJORITY OF MINIMUM STANDARDS DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM STANDARDS NOT APPLICABLE STANDARD: Adequate Infrastructure. [Section 5-230.D.5] Is the property subject to the proposal served by adequate roads, water, sewer and other public use facilities? This amendment will not result in the need for new infrastructure. EXCEEDS MINIMUM STANDARDS MEETS MINIMUM STANDARDS MEETS THE MAJORITY OF MINIMUM STANDARDS DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM STANDARDS X NOT APPLICABLE NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners ofthe County of Eagle, State of Colorado, in a unanimous vote APPROVED the County Initiated Zone Change to change the zoning of the Colorado River Ranch from the Planned Unit Development [PUD] Zone District to the Resource [R] Zone District, Eagle County File No. ZC-00085 for the following described property, attached as Exhibit' A', located in the unincorporated area of Eagle County subiect to compliance with the following condition: . I) That Eagle County Code Enforcement verify that existing uses and structures on the Colorado River Ranch property are consistent with uses and structures allowed within the 'Resource' zone district. Page 8 of 9 THAT the Board of County Commissioners directs the Director of Community Development to enter this amendment on the appropriate page of the Official Zone District Map and to provide a copy of this Resolution to the applicant. THAT the Board hereby finds, determines and declares that this Resolution is necessary for the health, safety and welfare of the inhabitants of the County of Eagle, State of Colorado. MOVED, READ AND ADOPTED by the Board of County COmnllSS#S of the County of Eagle, State of Colorado, at its regular meeting held the I!i day of '. ,~( , 2007, nunc pro tunc to the 29th day of May, 2007. . COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO, by and Through Its BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST:. ,&~ By: C~"f uJy. .~,.:.~.O. ~.~~\,\ . ":"l'Ol.OR ps"O Am M. Menconi, Chairman ..........,..,..., Teak J, Simonton Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners By: Commissioner ~ i <L ,. ('n) seconded adoption of the foregoing Resolution, The roll having been called, the ote was as follows: Commissioner Am M. Menconi Commissioner Sara J, Fisher Commissioner Peter F, Runyon This Resolution passed by -~/ 0 of Eagle, State of Colorado. (it J?>' a?v .. ...'L,. ,.- /' /~u ( 'J''/ vote of the Board of County Commissioners of the County . Page 9 of 9 " ( Exhibit A Legal Description - Colorado River Ranch A parcel of land situate in Tracts 42, 42-A, 43, 49,50,52,53 and 54, Government Lots 3,5 and 6 of Sections 13, 14, 15,22,23,24,26, and 27, all in Township 3 South, Range 86 West of the 6th Principal Meridian, County of Eagle, State of Colorado, according to the Independent Resurvey of said Township and Range approved by the Surveyor General in Denver, Colorado on May 5, 1923, Said Parcel of land, with all bearings based on a bearing ofN.OOo 52'26"E. between angle point No.3 and angle point NO.2 of Tract 54, both comers being found 212" USGLO Brass Caps on 1" iron pipes, and more particularly described as ~ollows: Beginning at angle point 3 tract 54, being a 212 inch USGLO Brass Cap, thence along a line between angle point 3 of tract 54 and angle point 2 of said tract 54; N.00052'26"E., a distance of 2441,68 feet to a set 2 Yz inch aluminum cap LS 33428 on the southerly line of tract 49. Thence, N.88058'1O"W.) a distance of 1066.73 feet, along the southerly line of tract 49 to angle point 5 of said tract 49, being a 2 Yz inch USGLO Brass Cap found, Thence, N.Ooo55'06"E" a distance of2641.39 feet, along the weste.rlyline oftract 49 to angle point 4 of tract 49 being a 2 Yz inch USGLO Brass Cap found, '. Thence, S,8805S'39t1E" a distance of 1072.17 feet along a line between angle point 4 of tract 49 and angle point 3 of said tract 49; to a 2 Yz inch aluminum cap LS 23089 found on the westerly line of tract 50. Thence, N.OI o02'58"E., a distance of 1514.82 feet along the westerly line of tract 50 to angle point 6 of tract 43, being a 2 Yz inch USGLO Brass Cap found. Thence, N.89003'35"W., a distance of 1326.83 feet along the southerly line of said tract 43 to angle point 5 of tract 43, being a 2 Yz inch Aluminum Cap, LS 23089 found. Thence, N.ooo56'25"E" a distance of 1324.85 feet to angle point 4 of said tract 43, being a 2 Yz inch USGLO Brass Cap found. Thence, N.88053'55"W., a distance of 1315.66 feet to angle point 3 of tract 43, being a set 2 Yz inch aluminum cap LS 33428, Thence, N.DI o06'05"E., a distance of2631.32 feet along the westerly line of said tract 43 to angle point 2 oftracr 43, being a 2 ~1 Aluminum Cap, LS 23089 found, Thence, S.88 053 '55"E., a distance of 1315.66 feet along the northerly line of tract 43 to angle point 1 aftract 43, being a 2 12 inch CSGLO Brass Cap found. Thence, S.OI o30'38"W., a distance of 1313.09 feet to angle point 8 of tract 43, being a set 2 ~.'1 inch aluminum cap LS 33428. Thence, S.890IQ'43"E" a distance of 1335.68 feet, passing over a 2 ~2 inch USGLO closing comer found at 199.98 feet to angle point 7 of tract 43, being a 2 ~ inch USGLO Brass Cap found. Thence, S.OI 0 11'22"W., a distance of 1325.47 along the easterly line of tract 43 to angle point 2 of tract 50, being a 2 Yl inch USGLO Brass Cap found. Thence, S.89001 '34"E" a distance of 13 J 7.34 feet along the northerly line of tract 50, to angle point I of tract 50, being a 2 Yz inch USGLO Brass Cap found. Thence, S..89000'36"E., a distance of 1318,64 feet along the northerly line of tract 52, passing 0.85 feet to the north of a 2 Y, inch aluminum cap LS 23089 and being 103,85 west ofangle point 3 of tract 42, to angle point 3 of tract 42, '. Thence, N.Ooo29'06"E., a distance of 1318,65 feet along the westerly line oftract 42, to angle point 2 of tract 42. Thence, S.89 oOI'36"E., a distance of 1325.35 feet along the northerly line of said tract 42, passing over a USGLO Brass Cap found at 327.36 feet, being a witness comer for angle point 2 of tract 42, to angle point I oftract 42, being a USGLO Brass Cap found. Thence, S,00046'34''W.. a distance of 1122,08 along the easterly line oftract 42. to a set #4 rebar with an aluminum cap LS 33428. Then.-:e, N.71 o34'23"E., a distance of 1186.60 feet, to a rebar with an aluminum cap LS 11204 found. Thence, S.3Z036'56"E., a distance of43.34 feet, to a rebar with an aluminum cap LS 11204 found, Thence, S.OI o30'QO"W., a distance of 555.30 feet, to a point ofintersection with the southerly line of tract 42-A and a set #4 rebar with an aluminum cap LS 33428, Thence, S.89000'36"E., a distance of 181.22 feet along said southerly line, to angle point 4 of said tract 42-A being a 2 Y, inch G LO Brass Cap found. Thence, S.89006'40"E., a distance of207.06 feet along the southerly line of tract 41, to the northeast comer of Government Lot 3, being a 2 !t2 inch aluminum cap LS 33428 set on the easterly line of the west Y! of the northwest 14 of section 24. Thence, S.00058'34''W., a distance of2406.07 feet along the easterly line of the west~"1 of the northwest 14 of section 24, to the center-west 1I16 comer of section 24, being a set 2 ~ inch aluminum cap LS 33428. ,.- Thence, ~.89007'27"W., a distance of) 318.25 feet along the Southerly line of said West Y2, Northwest \14, to the West If. comer of Section 24, a set 2 Y2 inch aluminum cap LS 33428. Thence; S.OOo57'08"W. a distance of 13) 8.73 feet along the easterly line of Goverrunent Lot 6 of Section 23 being identical with the westerly line of section 24 to a set 2 Y2 inch aluminum cap LS 33428. Thence, N.89001 '49"W., a distance of205.31 feet along the southerly line of Govenunent Lot 6 to the easterly line of tract 53, being a set rebar with a I 'lS inch aluminum cap LS 33428. Thence, S.00058'l1''W., a distance of 1549.30 feet along the easterly line of tract 53, to angle point 8 oftract 53, being a 2 Y2 inch USGLO Brass Cap found, Thence, N.89002'34"W., a distance of 1321.24 feet, to angle point 7 of tract 53, being a 2 Y2 inch USGLO Brass Cap found. Thence, S,OOo 55 '22"W., a distance of] 319,20 feet to angle point 6 of said tract 53 being a 3 ~ inch BLM, V,S. Department ofInterior Brass Cap on a 2 inch pipe found, Thence, N,88059'54"W., a distance of 1319.76 feet along the southerly line of tract 53, to angle point 5 of tract 53, being a 3 ~ inch BLM, U.S. Department ofInterior Brass Capon a 2 inch pipe found, Thence, S,00054' 14"W" a distance of 2640,50 feet along the easterly line of said tract 54, to angle point 6 oftract 54, being a2 Y1 inch USGLO Brass Cap found. Thence, N.88054' 16"W" a distance of2527.09 feet along the southerly line of tract 54 to a 2 Y2 inch USGLO Brass cap found being a witness comer for angle point 5 of tract 54, Thence, N,88054'15"W., a distance of 112.17 feet, continuing along said line to angle point 5 of tract 54, Thence, N.OO"57'5T'E., a distance of 1314.65 feet along the westerly line of said tract 54 to angle point 4 of tract 54, being a 2 Y2 inch USGLO Brass Cap found, Thence, S.88"58'30"E., a distance of 1321.48 feet along a line between angle point 4 and angle point 3 of tract 54, to the Point of Beginning, said parcel ofland containing 1044.256 acres more or less as surveyed by Benchmark Engineering Services in July and August of2000. Excepting therefrom the Right-of-Way of the Denver and Rio Grande Western Railroad, recorded in Book 116, Pages 165, 176, 198, 196, and 210 and in Book 82, Pages 554 and 579 and in Book 114, Page 358, said Right-ot:Way being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at a angle point 3 of tract 54 being a found 2 Y2 inch USGLO Brass cap on a 1 inch pipe; thence, N.88058'30"W., a distance of 132].48 feet to angle point 4 of tract 54. being a 2 Y1 inch USGLO Brass Cap; thence, S.Ooo57'S7"W., a distance of 1314.65 feet to angle point 5 of tract 54; thence, S.88054 '16"E., a distance of 753.03 feet along the southerly line of said tract 54 to a point on the westerly right of way of the Union Pacific Railroad, being a set rebar with an aluminum cap LS 33428, theTrue Point of Beginning. Thence, N.28016') 1 "E., a distance of 590,58 feet along the westerly right of way to a set rebar with an aluminum cap LS 33428. Thence, S.61 043'49"E., a distance of 50.00 feet along said right of way to a set rebar with an aluminum cap LS 33428. Thence, N,28016' lI"E" a distance of 6853.98 feet along said right of way to a set rebar with an aluminum cap LS 33428. '. Thence, N.89006'14"W., a distance of56.30 feet along said right of way to a set rebar with an aluminum cap LS 33428, Thence, N,280l6'll"E., a distance of 1483,74 feet along said right of way to a set rebarwith an aluminum cap LS 33428, / Thence, S.89006' 14"E,. a distance of 56,30 feet along said right of way to a set rebar with an aluminum cap LS 33428, Thence, N,280l6'II"E., a distance of832.75 feet along said right of way to a set rehar with an aluminum cap LS 33428, Thence, N,OooSS'13"E., a distance of 108.83 feet along said right of way to a to a set rebar with an aluminum cap LS 33428, Thence, N.280l6'11"E., a distance of358.67 feet along said right of way to a to a set rebar with an aluminum cap LS 33428, Thence, along said right of way on a curve to the right having an arc length of 43,29 feet, a radius of 14882,32 feet, a delta angle of 00010'00" and a chord of 43.29 feet which bears N.28021'11 "E to a set rebar with an aluminum cap LS 33428. Thence, along said right of way on a curve to the right having an arc length of 43.58 feet, a radius of 7491.17 feet, a delta angle of 00020'00" and a chord of 43.58 feet which bears N.28036'1] HE to a set rebar with an aluminum cap LS 33428. Thence, along said right of way on a curve to the right having an arc length of 43.87 feet, a radius of 5027.45 feet, a delta angle of 00030'00" and a chord of 43,87 feet which bears N.29001' II liE to a set rebar with an aluminum cap LS 33428, . " Thence, along" said right of way on a curve to the right having an arc length of 42.43 feet, a radius of3795.60 feet, a delta angle 0[00038'26" and a chord of 42.43 feet which bears N29035'24"E" feet to a set rebar with an aluminum cap LS 33428. Thence, S89000'36"E., a distance of 57.27 feet along said right of way to a set rebar with an aluminum cap LS 33428. Thence, along said right of way on a curve to the right having an arc length of 17.75 feet, a radius of 3006.49 feet, a delta angle of 00020'18" and a chord of 17,75 feet which bears N.30036'02''E. to a set rebar with an aluminum cap LS 33428, Thence, along said right of way on a curve to the right having an arc length of 43.87 .feet,"a radius of2513.75 feet, a delta angle of 01 000'00" and a chord of 43.87 feet which bears N.31 016'11 "E, to a set rebar with an aluminum cap LS 33428, Thence, along said right of way on a curve to the right having an arc length of 44.02 feet, a radius of2161.80 feet, a delta angle of 01 "}O'oo" and a chord of44.02 feet which bears N,32021 '11 "E. to a set rebar with an aluminum cap LS 33428, Thence, along said right of way on a curve to the right having an arc length of 405.90 feet, a radius of 1959,86 feet, a delta angle of 11051 '59" and a chord of 405,18 feet which bears N,38052'OO''E., to a set rebar with an aluminum cap LS 33428, Thence, N71 "34 '23 "E" a distance of 420.38 feet along the northern boundary of the Colorado River Ranch parcel described to a set rebar with an aluminum cap LS 33428, Thence, along the easterly right of way on a curve to the left, having an arc length of211.80 feet, a radius of 1809.86 feet, a delta angle of 06042'18" and a chord of211.68 feet which bears S.53025'08"W., to a set rebar with an aluminum cap LS 33428. Thence, N.39056'O 1 "W., a distance of 50.00 feet to a set rebar with an aluminum cap LS 33428, Thence, along said right of way on a curve to the left having an arc length of 556.05 feet, a radius of 1859.86 feet, a delta angle of 17007'48", a chord of 553,98 feet which bears S.41 030'05"W., to a set rebar with an aluminum cap LS 33428. " Thence, along said right of way on a curve to the left having an arc length of 41.98 feet, a radius of2061.80 feet, a delta angle of 0 1 0 10'00", a chord of 41. 98 feet which bears S.32021'II"W. to a set rebar with an aluminum cap LS 33428. Thence, along said right of way on a curve to the left having an arc length of 2.50 feet, a radius of 2413.75 feet, a delta angle of 00003' 33", a chord of 2.50 feet which bears 531044 '24"W., to a set rebar with an aluminum cap LS 33428. '. Thence, S.89000'36"E., 58.41 feet along said right of way to a set rebar with an aluminum cap LS 33428. Thence, along said right of way on a curve to the left having an arc length of27.39 feet, a radius oflOll.80 feet, a delta angle ofooQ46'48", a chord of27.39 feet which bears S.32009'35"W. to a set rebar with an aluminum cap LS 33428. Thence, along said right of way on a curve to the left having an arc length of 41,26 feet, a radius of2363.75 feet, a delta angle of 01 000'00", a chord of 41.26 feet which bears 5.31016' 11 "W. to a set rehar with an aluminum cap LS 33428. Thence, along said right of way on a curve to the left having an arc length of 41.55 f~et, a radius of2856.49 feet, a delta angle of 00050'00", a chord of 41.55 feet which bears 8,30021' 11 "w. to a set rebar with an aluminum cap L5 33428. . Thence, along said right of way on a curve to the left having an arc length of 41.84 feet, a radius of3595.60 feet, a delta angle of 00040'00", a chord of 41.84 feet which bears 8.29036'11 "w. to a set rebar with an aluminum cap LS 33428. . Thence, along said right of way on a curve to the left having an arc length of 42.13 feet, a radius of 4827.45 feet, a delta angle of 00030'00", a chord of 42.13 feet which bears 8.29001' 11 "w, to a set rebar with an aluminum cap LS 33428, Thence, along said right of way on a curve to the left having an arc length of 42.42 feet, a radius of7291.176 feet, a delta angle of 00020'00", a chord of 42.42 feet which bears S,28036' 1 I "W, to a set rebar with an aluminum cap LS 33428 Thence, along said right of way on a curve to the left having a an arc length of 42. 71 feet, a radius of 14682.32 feet, a delta angle of 00010'00", a chord of 42,71 feet which bears S.28021' 11 "W., to a set rebar with an aluminum cap LS 33428, Thence, S.28016'11 "W., a distance of745.35 feet along said right of way to a set rebar with an aluminum cap LS 33428. Thence, N.Ooo55' 13"E., a distance of 108.83 feet along said right of way to a set rebar with an aluminum cap LS 33428. Thence, 5.280] 6' 11 "W., a distance of 587.63 feet along said the right of way to a set rebar with an aluminum cap LS 33428. Thence, S.89006' 14 "E., a distance of 56.30 feet along said right of way to a set rebar with an aluminum cap LS 33428. Thence, S.280] 6' II "W., a distance of 1483.74 feet along said right of way to a set rcbar with an aluminum cap LS 33428. Legend Subject Property Com munity Labels - Rivers - Roads ----, L__J ToWl Boundaries C:J County Boundary Public Lands Ownership state BLM USFS USFS Wilderness ,.._-_._.~.~.........................~.._..........._~........... = '---.-......... F,\~McCoy . '--- ~ ~ = ~ (~~~ · '-'---. J I ~-......... (~~, .......-. Burns' . Bond ./ j// r( ; ... , r~ ~.;!. ...~r I""i;__~ ~ ---- ~;'.t Dotsero ~~-:;';o.~.:3iiitir ~.-oC..' ..... V '<<.-". 1 )" -.-............-,.... ~-- L,-"~1 G sum. ~ .~ ,y~ J. 1!._h,'-!., Eagle "';,.. ;IU "--- ..., t !1_J LJ~-J ~~ rr-'-'--, "i._ rJ L___ Edwards ,-------1 I I I I , I I I ~..~ L '1'Avon ~" .'Z'~. Cordillera Beaver Creek Vicinity Map lliIte: March 22.2007 &8 fl) o 2 4 8 Miles I LIse of this map should be forgenel3l and inbrma1ional purposes only. Eagle Countv does not warrant the accuracy of the data conlain ed herein.