Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
HomeMy WebLinkAbout124 Spring Pl - 210518201004INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PERMIT
EAGLE COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION
P.O. Box 179 - 500 Broadway • Eagle, CO 81631
Telephone: (970) 328-8755
COPY OF PERMIT MUST BE POSTED AT INSTALLATION SITE. PERMIT NO. 2198-02 BP NO. 14265
OWNER: KADY WARBLE PHONE: 970-949-0406
MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 7240, AVON, CO 81620
APPLICANT: SAME PHONE:
SYSTEM LOCATION: 0124 SPRING PLACE, EDWARDS, CO TAX PARCEL NO. 2105-182-01-004
LICENSED INSTALLER:_ J.A. BASKINS CONSTRUCTION, JACK BASKINS LICENSE NO. 53-02 PHONE: 970-926-3748
DESIGN ENGINEER: LKP ENGINEERING, LUIZA PETROVSKA PHONE NO. 970-926-9088
INSTALLATION HEREBY GRANTED FOR THE FOLLOWING: MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR A 4 BEDROOM RESIDENCE
1250 GALLON SEPTIC TANK (DESIGN CALLS FOR 1500 GALLONS), 1500 SQUARE FEET OF ABSORPTION AREA CREDIT, VIA 48 INFILTRATOR UNITS
AS PER ENGINEER'S DESIGN DATED 3/6/02
SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: INSTALL AS PER ENGINEER'S DESIGN DATED 5/28/02 WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: THE SOIL PROFILE MUST BE
OBSERVED BY EAGLE COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PRIOR TO OR AT THE TIME OF CONSTRUCTION TO VERIFY SOIL CONDITIONS: THE
EFFLUENT PIPE MUST BE DOUBLE ENCASED UNDER THE IRRIGATION DITCH FOR TEN FEET OF EITHER SIDE OF IT WITH SCHEDULE 40 PVC WITH
SUFFICIENT DIAMETER TO SLIDE OVER AND COMPLETELY ENCASE AND SECURE IN A WATER TIGHT FASHION WHERE PIPE PASSES THROUGH:
END CAPS SHALL BE SEALED WITH AND APPROVED UNDERGROUND SEALANT COMPATIBLE WITH THE PIPING USED. RAKE ALL TRENCH SURF-
ACES TO PREVENT THE SMEARING OF SOILS, AND DO NOT INSTALL IN WET WEATHER. CALL EAGLE COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH AND
THE DESIGN ENGINEER FOR THE FINAL INSPECTION PRIOR TO BACK FILLING ANY PART OF THE INSTALLATION, OR WITH ANY QUESTIONS
WITH THE INSTALLATION. THE BUILDING CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL THE SEPTIC SYSTEM HAS BEEN
INSPECTED AND APPROVED.
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH APPROVAL DATE: JUNE 3, 2002
CONDITIONS:
1. ALL INSTALLATIONS MUST COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE EAGLE COUNTY INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM REGULATIONS,
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GRANTED IN 25-10-104, 1973, AS AMENDED.
2. THIS PERMIT IS VALID ONLY FOR CONNECTION TO STRUCTURES WHICH HAVE FULLY COMPLIED WITH COUNTY ZONING AND BUILDING
REQUIREMENTS. CONNECTION TO, OR USE WITH ANY DWELLING OR STRUCTURE NOT APPROVED BY THE ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENTS SHALL
AUTOMATICALLY BE A VIOLATION OF A REQUIREMENT OF THE PERMIT, AND WILL RESULT IN BOTH LEGAL ACTION AND REVOCATION OF THE PERMIT.
3. CHAPTER IV, SECTION 4.03.29 REQUIRES ANY PERSON WHO CONSTRUCTS, ALTERS OR INSTALLS AN INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM TO
BE LICENSED.
FINAL APPROVAL OF SYSTEM (TO BE COMPLETED BY INSPECTOR):
NO SYSTEM SHALL BE DEEMED TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE EAGLE COUNTY INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM REGULATIONS UNTIL THE SYSTEM
IS APPROVED PRIOR TO COVERING ANY PORTION OF THE SYSTEM.
1488 effective
INSTALLED ABSORPTION OR DISPERSAL AREA: 744 art -„a l SQUARE FEET (VIA48 Infiltrator Units )
INSTALLED TANK: 1500 GALLONS IS LOCATED NW DEGREES-AN14 . 5 5 FEET INCHES
FROM Northeast corner of house. See engineer as—h„i1tG for 3.ec2tiRr.s of ;;13 cnm=nnantc_
COMMENTS: Final inspections were done by Victor Crocco of Eagle Co. Env.Health and UP
Engineering. The system is sized for 4 bedrooms. The irrigation ditch near tank hag heen
abandoned and the irrigation ditch near leach field has been lined.
ANY ITEM NOT MEETING REQUIREMENTS WILL BE CORRECTED BEFORE FINAL APPROVAL OF SYSTEM IS MADE. ARRANGE A RE -INSPECTION WHEN WORK IS
COMPLETED.
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH APPROVAL DATE: 1 �UC1
Incomplete Applications Will NOT Be Accepted
(Site -Plan MUST be attached)
ISDS Permit # Z24 , ff -6
Building Permit # 1_ 4 rpm
APPLICATION FOR INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PERMIT
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH OFFICE - EAGLE COUNTY
P. O. BOX 179
EAGLE, CO 81631
Eagle (970)328-8755, Fax (970)328-0349, El Jebel (970)927-3823
****************************************************************************
* FEE SCHEDULE
* APPLICATION FEE $350.00
*_ THIS FEE INCLUDES THE ISDS PERMIT, SITE EVALUATION (PERCOLATION TEST,
* SOIL PROFILE OBSERVATION) AND FINAL INSPECTION
* ADDITIONAL FEES MAY BE CHARGED IF A REINSPECTION IS NECESSARY, OR A
* PRE -CONSTRUCTION SITE VISIT OR CONSULTATION IS NEEDED
* REINSPECTION FEE $47.00, PRE -CONSTRUCTION SITE VISIT FEE $85.00
* MAKE ALL REMITTANCE PAYABLE TO: "EAGLE COUNTY TREASURER"
****************************************************************************
PROPERTY OWNER:
MAILING ADDRESS: - T2-40 U� (5u,10
APPLICANT/CONTACT PERSON: ,(
_LICENSED SYSTEMS
COMPANY/DBA:
rya (_ ."S tAk-VI�
CONTRACTOR:''���'
ADDRESS:
C ( C , bw)
PHONE: ! 1
PHONE:
PHONE: 6+(0
PERMIT APPLICATION IS FOR: ') NEW INSTALLATION ( ) ALTERATION ( ) REPAIR
LOCATION OF PROPOSED INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM:
Legal Description:
Tax Parcel Number: c2i190-- 0 ( _ U0 u 1 Lot Size:
Physical Address: `2-� S� ►(�-c t�G( -��-/
BUILDIN TYPE: (Check applicable category)
Residential/Single Family Number of Bedrooms.
( ) Residential/Multi-Family* Number of Bedrooms
( ) Commercial/Industrial* Type
*These systems require design by a Registered Professional Engineer
TYPE OF WATER SUPPLY: (Check applicable
( ) Well ( ) Spring ( ) fur
ublic. Name of Supplier: I
APPLICANTT SIGNATURE: -
category)
face
Date:
***************************************************************************
AMOUNT PAID: RECEIPT DATE:
CHECK # : 34 CASHIER: 0, hl�_
-+ � r -+-. r� �..+�.+•� i i• t, ti J l U J L V J V V J
a
Engineering, Inc.
C1 V.T.L/GWTEC TMCAL
January 4, 2003
L_NF GY1711YGGfC 11V17 11`u
Eric & Kady Warble RE:: Inspection of Septic System Installation
F.D. Box 7240 Lot 1, 131ock 5, Lake Creek Meadows
.von, CO 81620 1.24 Spring Place
Eagle County, Colorado
Project No. 20199 - Permit No. 2198-02
Dear Eric & Kady:
r'MUt K3L
At your request and at the request from Joe, on October 10, and 15, 2002, we visited the
construction site on Lot 1, Block 5, Lake Creek Meadows, 124 Spring Place, Eagle County,
Colorado. The purpose of our site visits was to observe the installation of the septic systern.
They installed the system in overall compliance with the septic system design, Drawing
No. 20199SD.DWQ dated March 5, 2002. The system. was installed as shown on the attached
sketch. They installed 1500-gallon, two -compartment, precast, concrete septic tank. The septic
tank was located 55 feet north to northwest from the northeast building corzaer. Forty-eight,
infiltrator chambers were installed in eight trenches. The first trench had 10 infiltrators, the next
two had seven each, the following two had six each, and the last three trenches had four
infiltrators each. Horizontal distance was 9 feet or more, from center to center of the trenches.
Inspection ports were installed in the first and last infiltrator chambers of each trench.
If you have away questions, please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
LKF Ene
Luiza Fetrovska,
President
Enclosure
cc: Ms_ Laura Fawcett, Eagle County Environmental Health Division, fax.: 329-0349
;1WP l0-TJJKP\201, 99osi.wpd
P.Q. Box 2837, Edwards, CO 81632, (970) 926-9088 Tel, (970) 926-9089 Fax
4 P.l. / AntA TPI. =e% _`l C e'r11 1klT41 17k_!1 ! UCi rl T!J Pull^!-'. "
M, 01-03-2043
1
SOIL AND FOUNDATION INVESTIGATION
FOR
PROPOSED RESIDENCE
LOT 1, BLOCK 5, LAKE CREEK MEADOWS
124 SPRING PLACE
EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO
PROJECT NO. 20199
OCTOBER 19, 2000
a �c
0 y
l; /FpF/ill yltt1{S{1�{���
PREPARED FOR:
ERIC WARBLE
P.O. BOX 7240
AVON, CO 81620
P.O. Box 2837, Edwards, CO 81632, (970) 926-9088 Tel, (970) 926-9089 Fax, E-mail: lkpeng@snowcap.net
T ABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................... 2
SCOPE OF STUDY........................................................... 2
SITE DESCRIPTION.......................................................... 2
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ................................................. 3
FIELD INVESTIGATION...................................................... 3
SUBSURFACE SOIL AND GROUNDWATER CONDITION ......................... 3
FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATIONS ......................................... 4
SLAB CONSTRUCTION...................................................... 4
RETAINING WALLS......................................................... 5
UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM ..................................................... 5
SITE GRADING AND DRAINAGE ............................................. 6
LAWN IRRIGATION......................................................... 6
LIMITATION............................................................... 7
FIGURES
LOCATION SKETCH ..........................................DRAWING NO. I
SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION LOGS ........ ................... FIGURE NO. 1
SWELL/CONSOLIDATION.....................................FIGURE NO's 2 & 3
PERIMETER DRAIN .......................................... FIGURE NO.4
LKP Engineering, Inc.
1. The proposed residence should be supported with
conventional type spread footings, designed for an
allowable soil bearing pressure of 2000 psf. They
should construct the footings on the undisturbed silty -
clayey sand. See Foundation Recommendations.
SCOPE OF STUDY
This report presents the results of a subsurface Soil and Foundation Investigation for a
proposed residence to be constructed on Lot 1, Block 5, Lake Creek Meadows, at 124 Spring
Place, Eagle County, Colorado. The purpose of the subsurface soil and foundation investigation
was to determine the engineering characteristics of the foundation soil and to provide
recommendations for the foundation design, grading, and drainage.
SITE DESCRIPTION
Lot 1 is a 4.2357-acre lot, on the southwest corner of the cul-de-sac at 124 Spring Place,
off Jackson Ranch Road in the Lake Creek Meadows Subdivision, south of Edwards, Eagle
County, Colorado. The topography was moderate to steep. Drainage is to the north and northeast.
A drainage ditch runs along the northern property line. Also, there was a dry ditch. Vegetation
consisted of aspen forest. Lot 1 is vacant.
LKP Engineering, Inc.
We have assumed that the proposed residence will consist of two stories, wood frame
construction, without a basement on a concrete foundation. We anticipate loads to be light,
typical of residential construction.
If the finalized plans differ significantly from the above understanding, they should notify
us to reevaluate the recommendations of this report.
FIELD INVESTIGATION
The field investigation conducted on October 4, 2000, consisted of excavating, logging
and sampling one test pit and one profile hole. Excavation of the test pits was done with a
conventional, John Deere 310E, rubber -tired backhoe. The test pits' locations are shown on
Drawing No. 1. We show the soil profile of the test pit on the Subsurface Exploration Logs,
Figure No. 1. Soil samples for laboratory soil analysis and observation were taken at selected
intervals.
SUBSURFACE SOIL AND GROUNDWATER CONDITION
The soil profile encountered in the two test pits was uniform. Test Pit No. 1 had 2 feet of
topsoil over 5.5 feet of light brown, silty -clayey sand to silty clay over 1.5 feet of weathered to
firm shale bedrock. The profile hole had 2.5 feet of topsoil over 4.5 feet of brown, clayey -silty
sand over 2 feet of light brown, clayey sand.
We sampled the soil in the test pit at random intervals. The soil samples were tested in
our laboratory for grain size distribution, natural moisture content, natural dry density, and
swell/consolidation. The test results are shown on Figure No's 2 and 3.
LKP Engineering, Inc.
y
4
FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATIONS
The proposed residence should be supported with conventional type spread footings,
designed for a maximum allowable soil bearing pressure of 2000 psf. The footings should be
placed on the undisturbed clayey -silty sand. If the entire foundation is supported on the bedrock,
the maximum allowable bearing pressure can be increased to 3000 psf. We recommend
minimum width of 16 inches for the continuous footings and 2 feet for the isolated footing pads.
Continuous foundation walls should be reinforced top and bottom to span an unsupported length
of at least 10 feet.
We recommend a minimum of 48 inches of backfill cover for frost protection of the
footing subsoils. The foundation excavation should be observed by the undersigned engineer to
verb that the soil conditions encountered during construction are as anticipated in this report.
The foundation excavation should be free from excavation spoils, frost, organics and standing
water. We recommend proof -rolling of the foundation excavation. Soft spots detected during
the proof -rolling, should be removed by overexcavation. Any overexcavation within the
proposed foundation, should be backfilled, in 8 inches loose level lifts and compacted to 100%
of the maximum dry density and within 2 percent of the optimum moisture content as
determined in a laboratory from a Standard Proctor test (ASTM D-698). A structural fill, placed
under footings should be tested by the engineer or her representatives on regular basis.
SLAB CONSTRUCTION
The natural on -site soils, exclusive of topsoil and organics, are suitable to support lightly
loaded slab -on -grade construction. The subgrade for the slab -on -grade construction should be
proof compacted to detect and remove soft spots. They should backfill overexcavated soft spots
and other underslab fill with the on -site soil, free from topsoil and organics, or other suitable
material, compacted to a minimum of 95 percent of the maximum standard Proctor density
(ASTM D-698). Suitable material should be free from topsoil, organics and rock fragments
LKP Engineering, Inc.
5
greater than 3 inches.
The concrete slab should be constructed over a 4-inch layer of clean gravel consisting of -
3/4 inch gravel with at least 50% retained on the No. 4 sieve and less than 3 percent passing the
No. 200 sieve.
They should reinforce the concrete slab -on -grade and score control joints according to the
American Concrete Institute requirements and per the recommendations of the designer to reduce
damage due to shrinkage. The concrete slab should be separated from the foundation walls and
columns with expansion joints to allow for independent movement without causing damage.
RETAINING WALLS
Foundation walls retaining earth and retaining structures that are laterally supported
should be designed to resist an equivalent fluid density of 60 pcf for an "at -rest" condition.
Laterally unrestrained structures, retaining the on -site earth, should be designed to resist an
equivalent fluid density of 40 pcf for the "active" case.
The above design recommendations assume drained backfill conditions and a horizontal
backfill surface. Surcharge loading due to adjacent structures, weight of temporary stored
construction materials and equipment, inclined backfill and hydrostatic pressure due to
undrained backfill should be incorporated in the design. They should try to prevent the buildup
of hydrostatic pressure behind the retaining wall.
UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM
To reduce the risk of surface water infiltrating the foundation subsoil, we recommend
installation of a foundation perimeter drain (see Figure No. 4). The foundation perimeter drain
should consist of a 4-inch diameter, perforated pipe, sloped to a suitable gravity outlet, or to a
sump pump location, at a 1/4 inch per foot for flexible or at a 1/8 of an inch for rigid pipe. The
drain pipe should be covered with a minimum of 6 inches of -3/4-inch free -draining granular
LKP Engineering, Inc.
6
material. Geotextile (Mirafi 140N or equivalent) should be used to cover the free -draining gravel
to prevent siltation and clogging of the drain. The backfill above the drain should be granular
material to within 2 feet of the ground surface to prevent a buildup of hydrostatic pressure.
SITE GRADING AND DRAINAGE
Grading plan was not available for our review. The following recommendations are
general. Exterior backfill should be compacted at or near the optimum moisture content to at
least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density under pavement, sidewalk and patio areas
and to at least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density under landscaped areas. They
should use mechanical methods of compaction. Do not puddle the foundation excavation.
The site surrounding the building structure should slope away from the building in all
directions. A minimum of 12 inches in the first 10 feet is recommended in unpaved areas, and
three inches in the first 10 feet in paved areas. The top of the granular foundation backfill
should be covered with a minimum of 1 foot of relatively impervious fill to reduce the potential
of surface water infiltrating the foundation subsoils.
Surface water naturally draining toward the proposed building site should be diverted
around and away from it by means of drainage swales or other approved methods. The roof
drains and downspouts should extend and discharge beyond the limits of the backfill.
LAWN IRRIGATION
It is not recommended to introduce excess water to the foundation soils by installing
sprinkler systems next to the building. The installation of the sprinkler heads should insure that
the spray from the heads will not fall within 10 feet of foundation walls, porches or patio slabs.
Lawn irrigation must be controlled.
LKP Engineering, Inc.
7
LIMITATION
This report has been prepared according to locally accepted Professional Geotechnical
Engineering standards for similar methods of testing and soil conditions at this time. There is no
other warranty either expressed or implied.
The findings and recommendations of this report are based on field exploration,
laboratory testing of samples obtained at the specific locations shown on the Location Sketch,
Drawing No.1 and on assumptions stated in the report. Soil conditions at other locations may
vary, which may not become evident until the foundation excavation is completed. If soil or
water conditions seem different from those described in this report we should be contacted
immediately to reevaluate the recommendations of this report.
This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Eric Warble, for the specific
application to the proposed residence on Lot 1, Block 5, Lake Creek Meadows, Eagle County,
Colorado.
Sincerely,
LKP ENGINEERING, INC.
Luiza Petrovska, PE
President
C:\A1yFi I es\corel doc\W PDOC S\20199sn d. rpt.wpd
LKP Engineering, Inc.
tt�
LOT 1
BLOCK 3
2,
PiL
LOT 2
BLOCK 5
_
713,
—,;60 �� l
!
-1173
Ali
LOT 4
BLOCK 5
CIVIL/GEOTECHNICAL
Engineering, Inc.
P.O. Box 2837 Edwards, CO 81632
tel (970) 926-9088 fax (970) 926-9089
NOTE: TEST PITS LOCATED BY PACING.
LOCATION SKETCH
LOT 1, BLOCK 5, LAKE CREEK MEADOWS
124 SPRING PLACE
EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO
PREPARED FOR:
ERIC JVARBLE
NO.: 20199
SCALE: — 1„ _ 10
0, I
DAZE: 10-19-2000
DRAVANG NO 1
2
c
°
1
c
0
x4
0
F'
0.1 1.0 10 100
APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf
Sample of Light brown silty clay from: Test Pit No. 1 at 4 feet
Natural Dry Unit Weight = 89.8 pcf
Natural Moisture Content = 8.0 percent
PRaEcr No.:
20199
LKP Engineering, Inc. Swell — Consolidation Test Results na, Na„ 2 9
- — TEST PIT NO.1
DATE OBSERVED: October 4, 2000
ELEVATION:
S
S
Y
A
DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL
LABORATORY
REMARKS
DEPTH
M
M
AND SAMPLE LOCATION
TEST RESULTS
FEET
B
P
O
L
L
E
---
Topsoil
DD= 89.8pcf
MC=8.0%
s
Light brown silty sand
-200=3.4%
MC=13.4%
Weathered bedrock
Shale bedrock
Bottom of test pit 9'
No Ground Water
Encountered
0
--- 15
--- 20
LEGEND:
❑ 2-inch O.D. California Liner Sample (relatively undisturbed sample)
■ Bulk, disturbed sample
DD Natural Dry Density (pco
MC - Natural Moisture Content (%)
-200 - Percent passing No. 200 sieve
LL Liquid Limit
PI - Plasticity Index
GW Ground Water
PROJECT NO. 20199
LKP ENGINEERING, INC.
SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION LOG
FIGURE NO. I
Percent
Coarser
by
Weight
..
O
O
q)
w
O
O
O
�
Z
O
O
O
U
a
O
p
O
rt
o
h
m
W
C
O
Q
�
x
o
0
0
N
O
`r
O
_o
o
n
�
C
O
h
O
v
�
O
N
y
�
�
2
O
Ln O
w
W
O
4,
O
O
Q�
L
O
LO
O
O
y
U
h
J h
C
Wto
O
O
2 N
Okr)
U
W
ti
O
7
O
W
� b
2
H
O
V1
�i
Q)
O
U
Percent
Finer by
Weigh
t
PRQ.ECT NQ:
20199
LKP Engineering, Inc. GRAIN -SIZE DISTRIBUTION nWR£Na: 3
SLOPE A 141A Y FROM BUILDING
°
CO DER BACKFILL WI TH ONE
FOOT OF RELA TI DEL Y
IMPER PIOUS SOIL
>
. .
° \ > 7 . ,
GRANULAR FILL
>
> D
Q O.O.
> ° ° FOC P/VG o 0 0 0
> ° 0O0 O o
° o
FILTER FABRIC
(/✓,IRAFI 14ON OR
EOU1'✓AL ENT)
PLASTIC LINER, GLUED COARSE GRAVEL, J14 INCH DIA1✓,.
TO THE FOUNDATION WALL, v✓/TH LESS THAN 52' FINES
(NOT NEEDED WHEN GROUND
!'✓ATER IS PRESENT)
4—INCH DIAMETER PERFORATED
PIPE SLOPED TO A SUITABLE OUTLET
A T 114 "" PER FOOT FOR FL EY, ISL E AND
AT 1/8 "" PER FOOT FOR RIGID PIPE
GRAVEL THICKNESS SHOULD BE
AT LEAST 24 INCHES AND SHOULD
INCREASE IF HEA VIER SEEPAGE 1S
ANTICIPA TED
PERIMETER DRAIN PROJECT NO.: 20199
CIVIL/GEOTECH\ICAL LOT 1, BLOCK 5, LAKE CREEK MEADOWS SCALE: NTS
124 SPRING PLACE
LKP Engineering, Inc. EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO - DATE: 10-19-2000
PREPARED FOR:
P.O. Box 1452 Avon, CO 81620 FIGURE No.:
tel (970) 926-9088 fox (970) 926-9089 ERIC WARBLE 4
LKP ENGINEERING, INC.
P.O. Box 2837
Edwards, CO 81632-2837
Fax (970) 926-9089
PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS
Location: Lot 1, Block 5, Lake Creek Meadows
Eagle County, Colorado
Project No.: 20199
Client: Eric Warble
P.O. Box 7240
Avon, CO 81620
P-1
P-2
P-3
TIME/DEPTH
22-8/16"
21-4/16"
21-8/16"
3:00
20-4/16"
3"
15-8/16"
2"
17-4/16"
2"
3:10
22-8/16"
Added Water
14"
2-4/16"
17"
1-8/16"
18-12/16"
1-8/16"
3:20
16"
2"
17-12/16"
12/16"
21-8/16" add
water 15"
2-12/16"
3:30
18"
2"
19-4/16"
1-8/16"
17-4/16
2-4/16"
3:40
18-8/16"
8/16"
19-12/16"
8/16"
18-12/16"
1-8/16"
3:50
19"
8/16"
20-4/16"
8/16"
19-12/16"
1"
4:00
19-8/16"
8/16"
20-12/16"
8/16"
Dry
PERC RATE
20 MIN/INCH
20 MIN/INCH
<5 MIN/INCH
AVG PERC:
13 MINUTES PER INCH
Average Percolation Hole Diameter: 10"
Holes Dug and Presoaked: 10-9-00
Test Run: 10-10-00
PROFILE HOLE:
0 to 2.5' Topsoil
2.5' to 7' Brown clayey silty sand
T to 9' Light brown clayey sand
No Ground Water
ISDS Permit 'DZ Date-10. - 0 2.
ISDS Final InsMection
Q=Ieteneng Form
Tank is 1.5 0 gal. Tank Material L L-cree
Tank is located l J. ,5f t . and ? ab ° degrees from ,Clot
tpes�.oeac leoaeuelel
Tank is located ft. and degrees from
(rexummt LWAM&k)
_ V Tank set level. 71 _Tank lids within 8" of finished grade.
size of field 150�C ft2 i units -7.11i lineal ft.
Technology
e S Cleanout is installed in between tank and house ( �1/10Oft �S
P 6,6 ,v 9
�V 5 There is a "T" that goes down 14 inches in the inlet and
outlet of the � tank.
/ �g t k k i N � N �
d Inletand outlet is sealed with tar -,tape,. rubber gasket etc.
s
Task has t*o coinpartments with the.,=.ager- ;cpipartment. closest to the
house.
y Xdabure distance and relative _ 7
,,Depth of field. a� ft. /aF��
c/ Soil interface raked _
Inspection portals at the .end of each trench:.
Proper distance to setbacks. \je,S - !1NeL c4��� P.e-
/ cry, p r 0. v e , 4`j
v' Chambers properly installed as per manufacturer$ specifications.
(chambers latched, end plates properly installed, rocks 'removed from
trenches, etc.) «,* y + RU
Type of pipe used for building sewer line , leach field cy�
=Inspection
Other
meets r2MAirements.�-Ie
G� Copy form to installer's file if recomendations for improvement Were
suggested.
ACTION TAKEN:
Setbacks
Well 'Potable
A
t
Fie d 0 25 5
Zallk 50 - 10
House
Property
line
Lake
Dry
Gulch
Tank
Drain
Stream
eS
0
es
0
�61S
0
Y 5e5-
Y
10
Sri
10
5
10
50
10
*
10
EA- ifEAVM
AG Cfffl*TY
P.O. BOX 179
EAGLE, CO 81631
PAOOUCT2*1(Sin* Sheets( Mf Vaddedl GroW. Mass. 0147i. Tv Oidn PHONE TOLL FREE 1-BOU125-6380
JOB
SHEET NO.
OF
CALCULATED BY V Y d C E O DATE
CHECKED BY--U r C E G' Q DATE
2198-02 Tax #2105-182-01-004
JOB NAME Lot #1, Block 5, WARBLE
Lake Creek Meadows
JOB NO. I&
q
�
DAT7�;;7
DATE COMPLETED
►,
DATE BiLLED_
L�
e0
I �A,
010
_n, mor Em Ed
Iraq
gill
0-1 FIRM
—.,m6A Wi
Was
TOTAL SELLING PRICE
Am "I.I. M. A". I WN - MI,'
-
--
TOTAL MATERIAL
-SINE:
'
LABORTOTAL
-■
•
JLM�V I Momm-2 or � J�W a", I
■
-■
-
ME
�4, WOMEN-■
14111
NO 1
TOTAL JOB COST!ME
GROSS PROFIT
Warm
VIVO
`
III
LESS OVERHEAD COSTS
% OF SELLING PRICE
_■
JOB FOLDER
PrInW in USA
�-' `. '.=. _� 1, yi �-IV
� L� t�� � � r•���_: �.�.
�� � � �`ter.` _•
,p 2i ifs-cz
r\ A-+.� ten; b�I
l 1( 5P'< -, P)c.r"
�J—Ci1 c( S
3 rows 4 „4,
w.ac bc�l r_vM� �i`r`S-C
L f'2LI 5f;,-1 Flc.c�
14-j—c.ickS CCl
lG t7- -C -2-
kA ,f
1'2-4 5pA�, C.Cc�
F,e.i► t,
0l'2y Sic;may Pt�c�
Cz
Td0 -,./ f1(
i nj
o� A-t,/�
t 'L L J 1p ' n+ tp L Ga C i' C� w CY c �. CL1i
14C;s 1 - CE&/� lGC r-<, —s
.tip:,-,�
i AwAc loo � C
Zfl Spin p(cc�
(-0�-tl5 L L^-Ice (k%
�Gf(-
I
NJ
:� tr el. .
41
Sk
;� i�� �J � — 1.
.• �. ��
�
�• � _..
Y
.,'1 I
1✓