HomeMy WebLinkAbout2366 Lake Creek Rd - 210518103004INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PERMIT
EAGLE COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION
P.O. Box 179 - 500 Broadway • Eagle, CO 81631
Telephone: (970) 328-8755
COPY OF PERMIT MUST BE POSTED AT INSTALLATION SITE. PERMIT NO. 2135-01 BP NO.13 �rl5
OWNER: KASIA KARSKA-HILL PHONE: 201-503-1685
MAILING ADDRESS: 109 HOLLYWOOD AVE., ENGLEWOOD CLIFFS, NJ 07632
APPLICANT: JAMES GILBERT PHONE: 970-926-8442/970-376-1424
SYSTEM LOCATION: 2366 EAST LAKE CREEK RD., EDWARDS, CO TAX PARCEL NO. 2105-181-03-003
LICENSED INSTALLER: BOSSOW EXCAVATION, REX BOSSOW LICENSE NO. 23-01 PHONE: 970-524-9888
DESIGN ENGINEER: LKP ENGINEERING, LUIZA PETROVSKA PHONE NO. 970-926-9088
INSTALLATION HEREBY GRANTED FOR THE FOLLOWING: MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR A 3 BEDROOM RESIDENCE
1000 GALLON SEPTIC TANK, 1500 SQUARE FEET OF ABSORPTION AREA CREDIT, VIA 49 INFILTRATOR UNITS, AS PER ENGINEER'S DESIGN.
SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS: INSTALL AS PER ENGINEER'S DESIGN DATED 6/25/01. DO NOT
TTIINSTALL ANY DEEPER THAN 3 FEET DUE TO SOIL MOTT-
LING AT 7 FEET, INDICATING THAT GROUNDWATER HAD BEEN PRESENT UP TO 7 FEET' RAKE ALL TRENCH SURFACES TO PREVENT THE SMEAR-
ING OF SOILS AND DO NOT INSTALL IN WET WEATHER. THE ADDITION OF ANY WATER FEATURES ON THE PROPERTY MUST HAVE PRIOR APPRO-
VAL BY EAGLE COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH. CALL THE DESIGN ENGINEER AND EAGLE COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH FOR A
FINAL INSPECTION PRIOR TO BACK FILLING ANY PART OF THE INSTALLATION OR WITH ANY QUESTIONS. THE BUILDING CERTIFICATE
OF OCCUPANCY WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL THE SEPTIC SYSTEM HAS BEEN INSPECTED AND APPROVED.
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH APPROVAL DATE: SEPTEMBER 7, 2001
CONDITIONS:
1. ALL INSTALLATIONS MUST COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE EAGLE COUNTY INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM REGULATIONS,
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GRANTED IN 25-10-104, 1973, AS AMENDED.
2. THIS PERMIT IS VALID ONLY FOR CONNECTION TO STRUCTURES WHICH HAVE FULLY COMPLIED WITH COUNTY ZONING AND BUILDING
REQUIREMENTS. CONNECTION TO, OR USE WITH ANY DWELLING OR STRUCTURE NOT APPROVED BY THE ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENTS SHALL
AUTOMATICALLY BE A VIOLATION OF A REQUIREMENT OF THE PERMIT, AND WILL RESULT IN BOTH LEGAL ACTION AND REVOCATION OF THE PERMIT.
3. CHAPTER IV, SECTION 4.03.29 REQUIRES ANY PERSON WHO CONSTRUCTS, ALTERS OR INSTALLS AN INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM TO
BE LICENSED.
FINAL APPROVAL OF SYSTEM (TO BE COMPLETED BY INSPECTOR):
NO SYSTEM SHALL BE DEEMED TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE EAGLE COUNTY INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM REGULATIONS UNTIL THE SYSTEM
IS APPROVED PRIOR TO COVERING ANY PORTION OF THE SYSTEM.
INSTALLED ABSORPTION OR DISPERSAL AREA: 1500 SQUARE FEET (VIA 49 INFILTRATOR UNITS )
INSTALLED CONCRETE SEPTIC TANK: 1000 GALLONS IS LOCATED 200 DEGREES AND 69 FEET INCHES
FRoM THE CLEANOUT ON THE SOUTH WEST SIDE OF THE HOUSE FOUNDATION.
COMMENTS: THE FINAL INSPECTIONS WERE DONE ON APRTI 10 2002, BY LAURA FAWCFTT OF FA(' F COTINTY
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH AND THE DESIGN ENGINEER. THE FINAL CERTIFICATION WAS RECEIVED ON
MAY 20, 2002. THIS SYSTEM IS LARGE ENOUGH TO ACCOMMODATE A THREE BEDROOM RESIDENCE.
ANY ITEM NOT MEETING REQUIREMENTS WILL BE CORRECTED BEFORE FINAL APPROVAL OF SYSTEM IS MADE. ARRANGE A RE -INSPECTION WHEN WORK IS
COMPLETED.
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH APPROVAL DATE: " 20, 2002
Incomplete Applications Will NOT Be Accepted
(Sites Plhn MUST be attached)
ISDS Permit #����
Building Permit #
APPLICATION FOR INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PERMIT
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH OFFICE - EAGLE COUNTY
P. 0. BOX 179
EAGLE, CO 81631
Eagle (970)328-8755, Fax (970)328-0349, El Jebel (970)927-3823
* FEE SCHEDULE
* APPLICATION FEE $350.00
* THIS FEE INCLUDES THE ISDS PERMIT, SITE EVALUATION (PERCOLATION TEST,
* SOIL PROFILE OBSERVATION) AND FINAL INSPECTION
* ADDITIONAL FEES MAY BE CHARGED IF A REINSPECTION IS NECESSARY, OR A
* PRE -CONSTRUCTION SITE VISIT OR CONSULTATION IS NEEDED
* REINSPECTION FEE $47.00, PRE -CONSTRUCTION SITE VISIT FEE $85.00
* MAKE ALL REMITTANCE PAYABLE TO: "EAGLE COUNTY TREASURER"
PROPERTY OWNER: It A 5/ ,g k n R_S K y -- H I I I
MAILING ADDRESS: tO9 413 f(y fe-000 viz &'J'3 e Wcdp PHONE: ��'�5-Qg-lt6fu
C4iicS AJ-e�7&Q
APPLICANT/CONTACT PERSON: �` ��L ���ZZ% T 3
PHONE: .%
LICENSED SYSTEMS CONTRACTOR: a S 0 k,> PHONE: &+0
COMPANY/DBA: 8CIsS00 CArCAV41naAf ADDRESS: A 0 900 4f6 B' C-YP SUH Cc�9.
***************************************************************************
PERMIT APPLICATION IS FOR: (>� NEW INSTALLATION ( ) ALTERATION ( ) REPAIR
LOCATION OF PROPOSED INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM:
Legal Description: L0 T , 6 t_aC_c< -7 1-4K-E K, Ms: 4 006t,d�S
Tax Parcel Number: � A0 S`^ 1 AV / " 0 3 ~ ® 0 3 Lot Size:
Physical Address: a236 6 f, C,I4K.- c,e s jf_=K P-C% 19ID
BUILDING TYPE: (Check applicable category)
O Residential/Single Family Number of Bedrooms._
( ) Residential/Multi-Family* Number of Bedrooms
( ) Commercial/Industrial* Type
*These systems require design by a Registered Professional Engineer
TYPE OF WATER SUPPLY: (Check applicable category)
( ) Well ( ) Spring ( ) Surface
(X) Public. Name of Supplier;, LRtcF C2g—Are !4 74a tie y7Rc c r-
APPLICANT SIGNATURE: / Date:
AMOUNT PAID: ��� RECEIPT $# : DATE:
CHECK # : 911319 CASHIER:
Community Development Department
(970)328-8730
FAX (970) 328-7185
TDD (970) 328-8797
Email: eccmdeva@vail.net
http: //www.eagle-county.com
EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO
Date: September 7, 2001
TO: Bossow Excavating
Eagle County Building
P.O. Box 179
500 Broadway
Eagle, Colorado 81631-0179
FROM: Environmental Health Division
RE: Issuance of Individual Sewage Disposal System Permit No.2135-01. Tax Parcel
# 2105-181-03-003. Property Location: 2366 East Lake Creek Rd., Edwards,
CO., Karska-Hill residence.
Enclosed is your ISDS Permit No. 2135-01 and a field copy of the engineer design stipulated on
the permit. It is valid for 120 days, or for the duration of your current building permit for this
property. The enclosed copy of the permit must be posted at the installation site. Any changes
in plans or specifications invalidates the permit unless otherwise approved. Please note any
special requirements that may have been added to the design by this department.
Systems designed by a Registered Professional Engineer must be certified by the Engineer
indicating that the system was installed as specified. Eagle County Environmental Health
must also view the installation prior to back filling. Please call well in advance for your
final inspection. Your TCO will not be issued until our office receives this certification
from the engineer, and views the installation.
Permit specifications are minimum requirements only, and should be brought to the property
owner's attention.
This permit does not indicate conformance with other Eagle County requirements. Please
notify this office if you have not been contracted to perform this installation.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact the Environmental Health Division at 328-
8755.
cc: files
LKP Engineering, Luiza Petrovska
DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
(970) 328-8755
FAX (970) 328-8788
TDD: (970) 328-8797
TOLL FREE: 800-225-8136
www.eagle-county.com
EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO
May 20, 2002
Kasia Karska-Hill
109 Hollywood Ave.
Englewood Cliffs, NJ 07632
Raymond P. Merry, REHS
Director
RE: Final of ISDS Permit 92135-01, Tax Parcel #2105-181-03-003. Property
location: 2366 East Lake Creek Rd., Edwards, CO.
Dear Mr. Karska-Hill:
This letter is to inform you that the above referenced ISDS Permit has been inspected and
finalized. Enclosed is a copy to retain for your records. This permit does not indicate
compliance with any other Eagle County requirements. Also enclosed is a brochure regarding
the care of your septic system.
Be aware that later changes to your building may require appropriate alterations of your septic
system.
If you have any questions regarding this permit, please contact the Eagle County Environmental
Health Division at (970) 328-8755.
Sincerely,
Janet Kohl
Eagle County Environmental Health Department
ENCL: Informational Brochure
Final ISDS Permit
cc: files
OLD COURTHOUSE BUILDING, 551 Broadway, P.O. Box 179, Eagle, Colorado 81631-0179
Cl'VFJ-/GEi 1-rQf 1CAL
May 18, 2002
N11s. Kasia IKars)ka-Rill
Karski Atelier
109 Hollywood five
Englewood Cliff's, NJ 07632
Dear Ms. Kasia:
RE: Inspection of Septic System Installation
Lot 1,]dock 6, Lalac Creek Meadows
A Fie-subd v; 0on of Lots I & 2
Eag1c. Countyy, Colorado
Project No. =0173 - ISDS Permit No. 2135-01
At the request of Mr. Jim Gilbert, on April 10, 2002, we visited the construction site on Lett 1,
Block o, Lake Creek Meadows, Eagle County, Colorado_ The purpose of our site visit was to inspect
the installation of the septic system.
They installed the system in overall compliance with the septic system design, Drawing No,
0173SD.DWG, dated June 25. 2001. They installed a 1000-gallons two cornpartments, a pree—avt,
or—irrete. septic tank. The septic tank had "T''s" in both -compartment�s.-,A cleanout was installed between
the House and the septic 'Unk as shown on the as -built sketch,
Forty-nine, Standard Infiltrator Chambers were installed in seven trenches with 4 infiltrators in
the first trerlci-i, 6 in ti-le seeond and third trenches, 7 in the fourth trench,,9 in the fifth and sixth trenches,
and 8 in the seventh trench. The infiltrators were connected with serial distribution and were 10 feet or
more on center, 1n the first and last infiltrator of each trench, inspection ports were installed. The e1`fluent
lime was 4-inch SDR 35 PVC.
The location of the septic tank and the location of the lisle coming into the first row of infiltrators
was different from on the original drawing, The atta0med as -built sketch shows the new location of the
tank and the line coming into the first row of infiltrators
There is no part ^fthe eff lent line crossing under the driveway_ The driveway is located to the
-north and west of t'he new residence. - -
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call.
Sl,�tsi�,�{at�ytiftrt.+trf
Sincerely, ti T' ofn~na1 FC� J��.
I,IKI,' E>agineeri t' ���
LizaPetrovska �py�y_ scr
Went
Enclosure' ` 1ni ffil"W
cc; Kasia Karska, fax:1-201-503-1689, and ECEH department at"970-329-0349
CADocurnents and gettingMdministratoWy bocutixetits\wF10-LKP\0173_0$1.wpd
P.O.. Box 2837, -Edwards, CO 81632, -(970) 926-9088 .Tol, -(970) 926-90s9 Fax--
r i'- P 1 -inT -;i74M ir): FQ(-'l F tall INTY FNU HFAI T H PAGE �
n
a
ISDS PERMIT # P 13 "o
PERCOLATION TEST
EAGLE COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEATLH
UwNtx: I
-PHSYSICAL ADDRESS -
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: _ ,n r ` "muo
MAILING ADDRESS:
TYPE OF DWELLING: NUMBER OF BEDROOMS:
TEST HOLES PRE-SOAKED: YES NO
SOIL
TIME WATER DEPTH INCHES OF FALL RATE PROFILE
TIME TO DROP LAST INCH: PERC RATE:
MINIMUM LEACH FIELD SIZE: MINIMUM SEPTIC TANK SIZE:
COMMENTS LQ2 ) 0 blA p' hs �,d ' 1 f c �+ lj) L K P 0",e., o v d
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SPECIALIST DATE
Y
LKP ` Engineering, Inc.
CIVIUGEOTECBMCAL
SOIL AND FOUNDATION INVESTIGATION
FOR
PROPOSED RESIDENCE
LOT 1, A RESUBDIVISION OF LOTS 1 & 2, BLOCK7
LAKE CREEK MEADOWS
EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO
PROJECT NO. 0173
JUNE 25, 2001
PREPARED FOR:
KARSKI ATELIER
C/O JOHN VALERSKY
P.O. BOX 413
EDWARDS, CO 81632
P.O. Box 2837, Edwards, CO 81632, (970) 926-9088 Tel, (970) 926-9089 Fax
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................... 2
SCOPE OF STUDY........................................................... 2
SITE DESCRIPTION ......................................................... 2
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ................................................. 3
FIELD INVESTIGATION...................................................... 3
SUBSURFACE SOIL AND GROUNDWATER CONDITION ......................... 3
FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATIONS ......................................... 4
SLAB CONSTRUCTION .................................... 4
RETAINING WALLS ......................................................... 5
UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM ..................................................... 5
SITE GRADING AND DRAINAGE ............................................. 6
LAWN IRRIGATION......................................................... 6
LIMITATION............................................................... 7
FIGURES
LOCATION SKETCH ..........................................DRAWING NO. 1
SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION LOGS ........................... FIGURE NO's 1-2
GRAIN -SIZE DISTRIBUTION ................................... FIGURE NO.3
PERIMETER DRAIN .......................................... FIGURE NO.4
LKP Engineering, Inc.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1. The proposed residence should be supported with
conventional type spread footings, designed for an
allowable soil bearing pressure of 2500 psf. They
should construct the footings on the undisturbed clayey -
gravelly sand with cobbles and boulders. See
Foundation Recommendations.
SCOPE OF STUDY
This report presents the results of a subsurface Soil and Foundation Investigation for a
proposed residence to be constructed on Lot 1, a Resubdivision of Lots 1 & 2, Block 7, Lake
Creek Meadows, Eagle County, Colorado. The purpose of the subsurface soil and foundation
investigation was to determine the engineering characteristics of the foundation soil and to
provide recommendations for the foundation design, grading, and drainage.
SITE DESCRIPTION
Lot 1 is located on the west side of Lake Creek Road, south from the intersection with
Lake Creek Road West in Lake Creek, south of Edwards, Eagle County, Colorado. The
topography of the proposed building site is moderate to steep. Vegetation on the lot consisted of
LKP Engineering, Inc.
K3
wild grass, sage brush and juniper trees. Existing old house and a couple of sheds were on the
proposed building site. It is our understanding that these buildings will be demolished. Drainage
is to the west and northwest..
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION
We have assumed that the proposed residence will consist of two stories, wood frame
construction, on a concrete foundation with a walkout basement. We anticipate loads to be light,
typical of residential construction.
If the finalized plans differ significantly from the above understanding, they should notify
us to reevaluate the recommendations of this report.
FIELD INVESTIGATION
The field investigation conducted on June 4, 2001,consisted of excavating, logging and
sampling two test pits. Excavation of the test pits was done with a CAT 416, rubber -tired
backhoe. The test pits' locations are shown on Drawing No. 1. We show the soil profile of the
test pits on the Subsurface Exploration Logs, Figure No's 1 and 2. Soil samples for laboratory
soil analysis and observation were taken at selected intervals.
SUBSURFACE SOIL AND GROUNDWATER CONDITION
The soil profiles encountered in the two test pits were fairly uniform. They consisted of
35 feet of topsoil over 5 feet of reddish -brown, clayey -gravelly sand with cobbles and boulders.
Ground water was not encountered in either test pit.
We sampled the soil in the test pits at random intervals. The soil samples were tested in
our laboratory for grain -size distribution and natural moisture content. The test results are shown
on Figure No. 3.
LKP Engineering, Inc.
n
FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATIONS
The proposed residence should be supported with conventional type spread footings,
designed for a maximum allowable soil bearing pressure of 2500 psf. The footings should be
constructed on the undisturbed clayey -gravelly sand with cobbles and boulders. Ground water
was not encountered. We recommend minimum width of 16 inches for the continuous footings
and 2 feet for the isolated footing pads. Continuous foundation walls should be reinforced top
and bottom to span an unsupported length of at least 10 feet.
We recommend a minimum of 48 inches of backfill cover for frost protection of the
footing subsoils. The foundation excavation should be observed by the undersigned engineer to
verify that the soil conditions encountered during construction are as anticipated in this report.
The foundation excavation should be free from excavation spoils, frost, organics and standing
water. We recommend proof -rolling of the foundation excavation. Soft spots detected during
the proof -rolling, should be removed by overexcavation. Any overexcavation within the
proposed foundation, should be backfilled, in 8 inches loose level lifts and compacted to 100%
of the maximum dry density and within 2 percent of the optimum moisture content as
determined in a laboratory from a Standard Proctor test (ASTM D-698). A structural fill, placed
under footings should be tested by the engineer or her representatives on regular basis.
SLAB CONSTRUCTION
The natural on -site soils, exclusive of topsoil and organics, are suitable to support lightly
loaded slab -on -grade construction. The subgrade for the slab -on -grade construction should be
proof compacted to detect and remove soft spots. They should backfill. overexcavated soft spots
and other underslab fill with the on -site soil, free from topsoil and organics, or other suitable
material, compacted to a minimum of 95 percent of the maximum standard Proctor density
(ASTM D-698). Suitable material should be free from topsoil, organics and rock fragments
LKP Engineering, Inc.
R
greater than 3 inches.
The concrete slab should be constructed over a 4-inch layer of clean gravel consisting of -
3/4 inch gravel with at least 50% retained on the No. 4 sieve and less than 3 percent passing the
No. 200 sieve.
They should reinforce the concrete slab -on -grade and score control joints according to the
American Concrete Institute requirements and per the recommendations of the designer to reduce
damage due to shrinkage. The concrete slab should be separated from the foundation walls and
columns with expansion joints to allow for independent movement without causing damage.
RETAINING WALLS
Foundation walls retaining earth and retaining structures that are laterally supported
should be designed to resist an equivalent fluid density of 60 pcf for an "at -rest" condition.
Laterally unrestrained structures, retaining the on -site earth, should be designed to resist an
equivalent fluid density of 40 pcf for the "active" case.
The above design recommendations assume drained backfill conditions and a horizontal
backfill surface. Surcharge loading due to adjacent structures, weight of temporary stored
construction materials and equipment, inclined backfill and hydrostatic pressure due to
undrained backfill should be incorporated in the design. They should try to prevent the buildup
of hydrostatic pressure behind the retaining wall.
UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM
To reduce the risk of surface water infiltrating the foundation subsoil, we recommend
installation of a foundation perimeter drain (see Figure No. 4). The foundation perimeter drain
should consist of a 4-inch diameter, perforated pipe, sloped to a suitable gravity outlet, or to a
sump pump location, at a 1/4 inch per foot for flexible or at a 1/8 of an inch for rigid pipe. The
drain pipe should be covered with a minimum of 6 inches of -3/4-inch free -draining granular
LKP Engineering, Inc.
In
material. Geotextile (Mirafi 140N or equivalent) should be used to cover the free -draining gravel
to prevent siltation and clogging of the drain. The backfill above the drain should be granular
material to within 2 feet of the ground surface to prevent a buildup of hydrostatic pressure.
SITE GRADING AND DRAINAGE
Grading plan was not available for our review. The following recommendations are
general. Exterior backfill should be compacted at or near the optimum moisture content to at
least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density under pavement, sidewalk and patio areas
and to at least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density under landscaped areas. They
should use mechanical methods of compaction. Do not puddle the foundation excavation.
The site surrounding the building structure should slope away from the building in all
directions. A minimum of 12 inches in the first 10 feet is recommended in unpaved areas, and
three inches in the first 10 feet in paved areas. The top of the granular foundation backfill
should be covered with a minimum of 1 foot of relatively impervious fill to reduce the potential
of surface water infiltrating the foundation subsoils.
Surface water naturally draining toward the proposed building site should be diverted
around and away from it by means of drainage swales or other approved methods. The roof
drains and downspouts should extend and discharge beyond the limits of the backfill.
LAWN IRRIGATION
It is not recommended to introduce excess water to the foundation soils by installing
sprinkler systems next to the building. The installation of the sprinkler heads should insure that
the spray from the heads will not fall within 10 feet of foundation walls, porches or patio slabs.
Lawn irrigation must be controlled.
LKP Engineering, Inc.
7
LIMITATION
This report has been prepared according to locally accepted Professional Geotechnical
Engineering standards for similar methods of testing and soil conditions at this time. There is no
other warranty either expressed or implied.
The findings and recommendations of this report are based on field exploration,
laboratory testing of samples obtained at the specific locations shown on the Location Sketch,
Drawing No.I and on assumptions stated in the report. Soil conditions at other locations may
vary, which may not become evident until the foundation excavation is completed. If soil or
water conditions seem different from those described in this report we should be contacted
immediately to reevaluate the recommendations of this report.
This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Karski Atelier for the specific
application to the proposed residence on Lot 1, a Resubdivision of Lots 1 & 2, Block 7, Lake
Creek Meadows, Eagle County, Colorado, Eagle County, Colorado.
Sincerely,
LKP ENGINEERING, 90/'�.p"
��;J�G•25.o�:
-o,
'J�q�
K� )
Luiza Petrovska, PE
President
C:WyFiles\coreldoc\W pdocs\0173d-gr-SND.RPT.wpd
LKP Engineering, Inc.
I
///�!•�j'/// .,/�./i/mil / ,/ .'//" /� � I ' I I ,'
Pit/Fa/ I'
a
i �fill( Pit I II
ROFVLF HO[E I — r �� 1 i;
I \ \
IPI\ Q, P-1 --\ I'
\P-2
I I 6s
i8?
LOCATION SKETCH PROXCr NO: 0173
CIVIL/GEOTECHNICAL LOT 1, A RESUBDI14SION OF LOTS 1 & Z SCALE:
LAKE CREEK MEADOWS — 1" = 60'
LKP Engineering, In c. EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO DAIF, 06-25-2001
P.PREPARED FOR:
tel (9070) 926 89088Edfox (970) 92639089 KARSKI ATELIER I
DRAw1NC Na: 1
DATE OBSERVED: June 4, 2001 TEST PIT #1
ELEVATION:
S
S
Y
A
DEPTH
M
M
DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL
LABOARTORY
REMARKS
FEET
B
P
AND SAMPLE LOCATION
TEST RESULTS
O
L
L
E
Topsoil
Reddsih—brown, clayey—grovelly
- 5
sand with cobbles and boulders
_
—200= 3790
' ;
MC=129
■
Bottom of Test Pit at 8 feet
No Ground Water
Encountered
- 10
15
20
LEGEND:
0 — 2—inch O.D. California Liner Sample
■ — Bulk Somple
DD — Natural Dry Density (pcf)
MC — Natural Moisture Content (9)
—200 — Percent Passing No. 200 Sieve
LL — Liquid Limit
Pl — Plosticity Index
GW — Ground woter
PRAECT Na:
0173
ISP ENGINEERING, INC.
SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION LOG
na,RE Na:
1
DATE OBSERVED: June 4, 2001 TEST PIT #2
ELEVATION:
S S
Y A
DEPTH M M DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL LABOARTORY REMARKS
FEET B P AND SAMPLE LOCATION TEST RESULTS
0 L
L E
Topsoil
Reddsih—brown, clayey —gravelly
a sand with cobbles and boulders
Bottom of Test Pit at 8 feet No Ground Water
Encountered
10
15
20
LEGEND:
0 — 2—inch O.D. California Liner Sample
■ — Bulk Sample
DD — Natural Dry Density (pcf)
MC — Natural Moisture Content (9)
—200 — Percent Passing No. 200 Sieve
LL — Liquid Limit
PI — Plasticity Index
GW — Ground water
PROXCT NO.: 017-1
LKP ENGINEERING, INC. SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION LOG Flag Na:
2::_
Percent Coorser by Weight
O N v U)
�
O
O
O
�
O
O
y
ti
O
O
O
O
QO
O
0
N
ov
74
O
o
0
0
h
O
v
O
M
m �
j
b
2 ^
L ^
W
N O
Q �
2 �o
ti
y
v1
J r�
�
�
O
C
W
U
2
$
2
O
V N
U)
2
2
O
O
O
� �
W
tp
O
2
y
O
Qj
O ooi CO (Oo h v N O
Percent Fin er by Weigh t
O
k
t
U
PRaCCT NO.: -
0173
LKP En gin eerin g, Inc. GRAIN -SIZE DISTRIBUTION nGURf NO.: 3
SLOPE AWA Y FROM BUILDING
° D °
°
D COVER BACKFILL WITH .ONE
° FOOT OF RELA TI VEL Y
IMPERVIOUS SOIL
D D
°
e
D -
D —
e J
J
D o
° Q D D . . . . . . . . . . . /\
D Z GRANULAR FILL
e D O
FILTER FABRIC
D ° (MIRAFI 140N OR
EOUIVALENT)
F00T11 G
D p °
PLASTIC LINER, GLUED COARSE GRAVEL, J14 INCH DIAM.
TO THE FOUNDATION WALL, WITH LESS THAN 59 FINES
(NOT NEEDED WHEN GROUND
WATER IS PRESENT)
4-INCH DIAMETER PERFORA TED
PIPE SLOPED TO A SUITABLE OUTLET
A T 114 " PER FOOT FOR FLEXIBLE AND
A T 118 PER FOOT FOR RIGID PIPE
GRA VEL THICKNESS SHOULD BE
A T LEAST 24 INCHES AND SHOULD
INCREASE IF HEAVIER SEEPAGE IS
ANTICIPA TED
PERIMETER DRAIN PROXCT NO.: 017.3
CIVIL/GEOTECHNICAL LOT 1, A RESUBDIWSION OF LOTS 1 do 2, SCALE:
LAKE CREEK MEADOWS NTS
LKP Engineering, Inc. EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO DATE' 06-25-2001
PREPARED FOR:
P.O. Box 1452 Avon, co 81620 KARSKI ATELIER RGURE NO.: 4
tel (970) 926-9088 fox (970) 926-9089
LKP ENGINEERING, INC.
P.O. Box 2837
Edwards, CO 81632-2837
(970) 926-9088
Fax (970) 926-9089
PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS
Client: Karski Atelier
c/o Mr. John Valersky
P.O. Box 413
Edwards, CO 81632
Project No.: 0173
Location: Lot 1, Block 7
Lake Creek Meadows
Eagle County, Colorado
L I
P-1
P-2
P-3
TIME/DEPTH
25-10/16"-16"
water
standing
17-8/16"
16-12/16"
10
6-8/16"
4/16"
6-15116"
9/16"
8-1/16"
14/16".
10
6-14/16"
6/16"
7-8/16"
9/16"
8-14/16"
13/16"
10
7-2/16"
4/16"
7-11/16"
3/16"
9-7/16"
9/16"
10
7-6/16"
4/16"
7-15/16"
4/16"
10"
9/16"
10
7-11/16"
5/16"
8-4/16"
5/16"
10-8/16"
8/16"
10
7-15/16"
4/16"
8-8/16"
4/16"
I1"
8/16"
10
8-3/16"
4/16"
8-12/16"
4/16"
11-4/16"
4/16"
PERC RATE
40 MIN/INCH
40 MINANCH
40 MIN/INCH
AVG PERC
1
40 MPI
Average Percolation Hole Diameter: 6 Inches
Holes Presoaked: June 8, 2001
Test Run: June 9, 2001
By: Peter Petrovski/Luiza Petrovska
Soil Profile: 0A.5' feet of topsoil
1.5 -7' feet of brown, clayey
gravelly sand
7-8' Orange & brown silty sand
No ground wat�e�r� ��-_
ISDs Permit Date---4-V
I3DS Final Inspection
/ QW19teness Form
= Tank is gal. Tank Material
::2Tank is located ft. and L oa degrees from
(pssrneat l.nas.s�c)
Tank is located ft. and degrees from
tresmaae= Loods W
Tank set level. ✓ Tank lids within S" of finished grade.
size of field �"ft2 units lineal ft.
Tec -logy `l0
y Cleanout is installed in between tank and house(+ 1/100ft).
i/ There is a "T" that goes down 14 inches in the inlet and
outlet of the tank:
t! inlet.and outlet is sealed with tar• -,tape,- rubber gasket etc.
ink ;has two` dompartments with the.;-.jargsr-.%.eQ apartment closest to the
house.
V ;measure: distance and relative dirept�=a to: ,field. Q5 &
_ Depth of field. 2"3 ft. not gat.
Soil interface raked. QJU .iva,;Q,. ..AA'XM4-\, 4-1 4
�rInspection portals at the .end of each trench..
L Proper distance to setbacks. ke J�
-6 "l
Chambers properly installed as per manufacturers specifications.
(Chambers latched, end plates properly installed, rocks 'removed from
trenches, etc.) PVC 12�
Type of pipe used for building sewer leach field �b►�. "��'
Other �-6TLr�►tCQ
V Inspection meets requirements.
Copy form to installer's file if recommendations for improvement were
suggested.
ACTION TAKEN:
Setbacks
Well 'Potable House Property Lake Dry Tank Drain
Water Lines line Stream Gulch
Field 100 25 20 10 50 25 10 10
50 10 5 10 50 10 * 10
2135-Q Tax#210518103003
JOB NAME- Lot#1;La�e Creek KARSKA
2366 Lake Creek Rd
1191, INWE t-w4t-r -
•
B LOCATION
BILL TO
DATE STARTED
,
i /
DATE COMPLETED
DATE BILLED
/o1
00
Q
%J l� j rZ
%tZ (rya t�
it ch .-VOW
ctc -
UU
alu .
tit
3 ' t t -10
o
W6 t�.E Cc� �
CA
+
2
a7Z.J��
q12 L I'
�LLA�l
a�,
If
It, I
AAAgo
Ll�� ��jx-vl
JOB COST SUMMARY
n
TOTAL SELLING PRICE
TOTAL MATERIAL
TOTAL LABOR
} 1
•
i
INSURANCE
'�
SALES TAX
1
MISC. COSTS
TOTAL JOB COST
GROSS PROFIT
LESS OVERHEAD COSTS
% OF SELLING PRICE
NET PROFIT
JOB FOLDER Product 278
�13,-0 1 7 j OS- is)— 65 -c03 lfl 02
JOB FOLDER
z 105-1 b 1
C L D Ka rs �a
Printed in USA
