No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAbout167 Golden Bear Dr - 210716302016INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PERMIT EAGLE COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION P.O. Box 179 - 500 Broadway • Eagle, CO 81631 Telephone: (970) 328-8755 COPY OF PERMIT MUST BE POSTED AT INSTALLATION SITE. PERMIT NO. 2051-00 BP NO. 13446 OWNER: ARDEN DEVELOPMENT CO./ CROSSFIRE OF VAIL, LLC PHONE: 970-949-9232 MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 1412, AVON, CO 81620 APPLICANT: ROB HANEY PHONE: 970-949-9232 SYSTEM LOCATION: 166 GOLDEN BEAR DRIVE, EDWARDS, CO TAX PARCEL NO. 2107-163-02-010 LICENSED INSTALLER: S. RUDER EXCAVATING, STEVE RUDER LICENSE NO. 33-00 PHONE: 970-926-1056 DESIGN ENGINEER: LKP ENGINEERING, LUIZA PETROVSKA PHONE NO. 970-926-9088 INSTALLATION HEREBY GRANTED FOR THE FOLLOWING: MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR A 4 BEDROOM RESIDENCE 1250 GALLON (DESIGN CALLS FOR 1500) SEPTIC TANK, 1488 SQUARE FEET OF ABSORPTION AREA CREDIT VIA 48 INFILTRA- TOR UNITS AS PER ENGINEER'S DESIGN. SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS: INSTALL AS PER ENGINEER'S DESIGN DATED 5/3/00. MAINTAIN ALL APPLICABLE SETBACK REQUIRE- MENTS, AND DO NOT INSTALL IN WET WEATHER.. ENGINEER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR FINAL INSPECTION. DO NOT BACK FILL ANY PART OF THE INSTALLATION UNTIL THE ENGINEER HAS INSPECTED AND APPROVED IT. THE BUILDING CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL THE SEPTIC SYSTEM HAS BEEN APPROVED. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH APPROVAL: LAURA FAWCETT DATE: NOVEMBER 6, 2000 CONDITIONS: 1. ALL INSTALLATIONS MUST COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE EAGLE COUNTY INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM REGULATIONS, ADOPTED PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GRANTED IN 25-10-104, 1973, AS AMENDED. 2. THIS PERMIT IS VALID ONLY FOR CONNECTION TO STRUCTURES WHICH HAVE FULLY COMPLIED WITH COUNTY ZONING AND BUILDING REQUIREMENTS. CONNECTION TO, OR USE WITH ANY DWELLING OR STRUCTURE NOT APPROVED BY THE ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENTS SHALL AUTOMATICALLY BE A VIOLATION OF A REQUIREMENT OF THE PERMIT, AND WILL RESULT IN BOTH LEGAL ACTION AND REVOCATION OF THE PERMIT. 3. CHAPTER IV, SECTION 4.03.29 REQUIRES ANY PERSON WHO CONSTRUCTS, ALTERS OR INSTALLS AN INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM TO BE LICENSED. FINAL APPROVAL OF SYSTEM (TO BE COMPLETED BY INSPECTOR): NO SYSTEM SHALL BE DEEMED TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE EAGLE COUNTY INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM REGULATIONS UNTIL THE SYSTEM IS APPROVED PRIOR TO COVERING ANY PORTION OF THE SYSTEM. INSTALLED ABSORPTION OR DISPERSAL AREA: 1488 SQUARE FEET (VIA 48 INFILTRATOR UNITS. AS PER ENGINEER'S DESIGN) INSTALLED CONCRETE SEPTIC TANK: 1500 GALLONS IS LOCATED 218 DEGREES AND 19 FEET 6 INCHES FROM THE CLEANOUT ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE HOUSE. COMMENTS: THE FINAL INSPECTION WAS DONE BY LAURA FAWCETT OF EAGLE COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH AND THE DESIGN ENGINEER ON 5/30/04. THE ENGINEER'S FINAL CERTIFICATION WAS RECEIVED ON 6/4/03. PHOTOS OF THE RISER RINGS ON THE TANK RECEIVED ON 2/24/04. THIS SYSTEM IS LARGE ENOUGH FOR A FOUR BEDROOM RESIDENCE. ANY ITEM NOT MEETING REQUIREMENTS WILL BE CORRECTED BEFORE FINAL APPROVAL OF SYSTEM IS MADE. ARRANGE A RE -INSPECTION WHEN WO IS COMPLETED. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH APPROVAL DATE: MARCH 9, 2004 SENT BY: 10-31- 0 ; 17:54 ;CommunityDeveiopment-j ;# 2/ 6 I nCOMPlete APPlicationg Will NOT Be Accepted .(Site Plan ]lYli'UST be attached) ISDS Permit # J Building Permit ## APPLICATION FOR INDIVIDUAL SEWAGI� DISPOSAL SYSTEM PERMIT ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH OFFICE - EAGLE COUNTY P. O. BOX 179 EAGLE, CO 81631 32B=8755/927-3823 (El Jebel) *******,r*****�rrr�rve*w�r�i*w�rx�t�*•x**************t*,r�r********�r****�r*x�r*yr*�r�rrrrr*** * FEE SCHEDULE * PERMIT APPLICATION FEE $150.00 PERCOLATION TEST FEE $200.00 * SIZING AND SITE V-1SIT FEE $85.00 (WHEN ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SIZES THE * SYSTEM USING YOUR SOILS PXPOR.T) * MAKE ALL REMITTANCE PAYABLE TO: "EAGLE COUNTY TREASURER" PROPERTY OWNER: C'"SppSPi %kS OP 1 AA L- pW L-- MAILING ADDRESS. P© I�nX. l 2- .•.•-"ry SLE) 20 VTY PHONE: W el -et 231 APPLICANT/CONTACT PERSON: ?4T>' A"*'-j LICENSED SYST2MS CONTRACTOR: RAE - EACA%AgTPO PHONE: ;�(- PHONE! COMPANY/DBA : ADDRESS: 040 '�>0 Y 114 12 . ) 'V OLAJ PERMIT APPLICATION IS FOR: �0 NEW INSTALLATION ( ) ALTERATION ( ) REPAIR LOCATION OF PROPOSED IND Legal Description: Tait Parcel Number: Z�o"i L OS 02- 01 Q LotSize: 2 • �5� /4 �. Physical Address: Buri'DIN[; TYPE: (Check applicable category) (� Residential/Single Family Number of .Bedrooms 1+ ( _) Residential/Multi-Family* Number of Bedrooms__ ( ) Commercial/Industrial* Type *These systems require design by a Registered Professional Engineer TYPE OF WATER SUPPLY: (Check applicable category) ( ) Well ( ) S r'n ( ) Surface (7,� Public Na of S 1'a APPLICANT SIGNATURE: Date: 01jOV 2- 2-000 �F it Yt Yt Yt 'k 7k �k At 5Y 'k -k 7k is �F Yr k * � � �Ik ����t) it k Ye W * et �F dr tk �F dr * �k 51r * Ye •k * �e k 'k •!t •k tk * k !r �e Ye Ye Yr Ye Ye Ye �!r'k. Yt 9t �F •/r it * * Ir * it / GZi AMOUNT PAID : f S� RECEIPT # : (� DATE: CHECK # : 4 CASHIER: DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH (970)328-8755 FAX: (970) 328=8788 TOLL FREE:800-225-6136 www.eaglecounty.us March 9, 2004 Arden Development Company Attn: Rob Haney P.O. Box 1412 Avon, CO 81620 EAGLE COUNTY RAYMOND P. MERRY, REHS Director RE: Final of ISDS Permit #2051-00, Tax Parcel #2107-163-02-010. Property location: 166 Golden Bear Drive, Edwards, CO. Dear Mr. Haney: This letter is to inform you that the above referenced ISDS Permit has been inspected and finalized. Enclosed is a copy to retain for your records. This permit does not indicate compliance with any other Eagle County requirements. Also enclosed is a brochure regarding the care of your septic system. Be aware that later changes to your building may require appropriate alterations of your septic system. If you have any questions regarding this permit, please contact the Eagle County Environmental Health Division at (970) 328-8755. Sincerely, Janet Kohl Eagle County Environmental Health Department ENCL: Educational Brochure Final ISDS Permit cc: files, March 2004 Chrono file 500 Broadway, P.O. Box 179, Eagle, Colorado 81631-0179 Community Development Department (970) 328-8730 FAX (970) 328-7185 TDD (970) 328-8797 Email: eccmdeva@vail.net http: //www.eagle-county.com EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO Date: November 6, 2000 TO: S. Ruder Excavating Eagle County Building P.O. Box 179 500 Broadway Eagle, Colorado 81631-0179 FROM: Environmental Health Division RE: Issuance of Individual Sewage Disposal System Permit No.2051-00. Property Location: 166 Golden Bear Drive, Edwards, CO., Arden Development Co. property. Enclosed is your ISDS Permit No. 2051-00. It is valid for 120 days. The enclosed copy of the permit must be posted at the installation site. Any changes in plans or specifications invalidates the permit unless otherwise approved. Please note any special requirements that may have been added to the design by this department. Systems designed by a Registered Professional Engineer must be certified by the Engineer indicating that the system was installed as specified. Eagle County does not perform final inspections on engineer designed systems. Your TCO will not be issued until our office receives this certification. Permit specifications are minimum requirements only, and should be brought to the property owner's attention. This permit does not indicate conformance with other Eagle County requirements. Please notify this office if you have not been contracted to perform this installation. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact the Environmental Health Division at 328- 8755. cc: files LKP Engineering, Luiza Petrovska u �+r V-�r �.+.+.+ �++J•�.J JrCJJLV JVVJ ILK ' Engineering, Inc. CIVILIGEOTI;CHNICAL June 2, 2003 Rob Heaney Arden Development P.O. Box 1412 Avon, CO 91620 Dear Rob: "MF G11UJ_1VGGIC1111U 111I41 RE: Inspection of Septic System Ynistailatinn Lot 15, Bloch 2, Cordillera Filing No. 36 167 Golden Pear .Drive Eagle County, Colorado Project No. 2082 - ISDS Permit No. 20511-00 rHut U1 At your -request and at the request of Steve Ruder on May 27 and 28, 2003, we visited the construction site on Lot 15, Block 2, Cordillera Filing No. 36, 167 Golden Bear Drive, Eagle County, Colorado. The purpose of our site visits was to inspect the installation of the septic systems. They installed the system in overall compliance with the septic systems, design, Drawing No. 2082SD.DWG, elated May 3, 2000, as shown on the attached as -built sketch. They installed a 1500- gallon, two compartments, a precast, concrete septic tank. 'Elie septic tank will have 8 feet of risers to bring the covers to within S inches of the finished grade. A, cleanout Was installed between the douse and the septic tank. Forty-eight, Standard infiltrator Chambers were installed in three trenches. The first trench, next to the west property line, had 18 infiltrators with a 6-foot separation between the first two and the last sixteen, infiltrators. The middle trench had sixteen infiltrators, a six-foot separation and than two more infiltrators, The last and easternmost trench had twelve infiltrators. The infiltrators were connected with serial distz-ibution. In the first and last infiltrator of each trench, inspection ports were to be installed. The effluent litre was 4-inoh SDR 35 PVC. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Sinc=ely, LKF Engiitacexain 29526 Luiza Petro sl[a, President .r`-�.- .•`'t Enclosure cc: Mrs. Laura Fawcett, Eagle County Building Department, fax: 328-0349 C AW P 1 o-LXM 082osi. wpd P.O. Box 2$37, Edwards, CO 81632, (970) 926-9088 Tel, (970) 926-9089 Fax TI IM_d_CDM= I.IC'M MO- Ml e)M TTr- =n _'1 C rill lf,17V Chill UCni 7U mne'C. -1 —— _ _ _— -- ..1...r1 r...i..n"u o v•a---vvzv Im if lY f • f. Engineering, Inc. CTvx/r'EOTECIi %C: ' . SOIL AND FOUNDATION INVESTIGATION FOR PROPOSED RESIDENCE LOT 15, BLOCK 2, CORDILLERA FILING NO.36 GOLDEN BEAR MEADUWS EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO PROJECT NO. 99239 29,1999 j j'zj. qq 2M PREPARED FOR: MR. DRREK TURNER, TRUSTEE THE TURNER REVOCABLE TRUST 2000 SE 1571 STREET, BLDG 450 EDMOND, OK 73013 E.O. Dox 2837, Ldwards, CO 81632, (970) 926-9089 Tel, (970) 926-9089 Nix, E-mail: lkpeng@&uowcap.net &uowcap.nct Nnu-P-PMA TNI 1 1 P: 7�7PM Tn! PQr I P rn INTY PWIJ W1=01 TW onr_c. 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECU IVE SUMMARY ... . - - SCOPE OF STUDY .... .. . . SITE DESCRIPTION PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION .... , , . FIELD INVESTIGATION . . . SIJBSURFACE SOIL AND GROUNDWATER CONDITION . ........... FOUNDATION RECOMM:ET�IDATlONS SLAB CONSTRUCTION .. ..... RETAINING, WALLS. UNOERDRAIN SYSTEIVI... SITE GRAVING AND DRAINAGE .. . LAWN IRRIGATIDN ... .... .... .... , .. , ..... 6 LIMITATIOTd . , .. , .... . . FIGURES LOCATION SKETCH ... .... • .... ..... ... . . .... DRAWING NO. t SUBSURFACE. EXPLORATIOIq LOC3S........ ... , FI4iURE Na'S I-2 SWELL -CONSOLIDATION *"EST RESULTS... • , .... . . ,_..._...FIGUREIYO's3&4 PERIMETER DRAIN ..... ..... . ........... . . . . . ..FIGURE NO. 5 NjntJ-P-aGlPM TPII 1P-77PM Tn—Pnf-�I P rniIFJTV Phll1 WPCI Tu onr-o-o EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The proposed residence should be supported with conventional type spread footings, designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of 3000 psf and a minimums dead lead of 1000 psf. They should construct the footings on the undisturbed, sandy clay to clayey - sandy gravel. See Foundation Recommendations. SCOPE OF STUDY This report presents the results of it subsurface Soil and Foundation Investigation for a proposed residence to be constructed on Lot 15, Block 2, Cordillera Filing No, 36, at Golden Bear Meadows, Eagle County, Colorado, The purpose of the subsurface soil and foundation investigation was to determine the engineering characteristics of the foundation soil and to provide recommendations for the foundation design, grading, and drainage. SITE DESICRIPTION Lot 15 is a 2.957-acre lot, at 0878 Golden Bear Meadows off The Summit Trail, west of the intersection with Sage Grouse Trail, in Cordillera, Eagle County, Colorado. The lot is on the south side of the road. The topogrrdphy is moderate, changing to steep south of the building envelope. Vegetation can the lot consisted of sage brush and grass with outcropping of basalt rock. Drainage is to south. Lot 15 and the surrounding lots are vacant. LKP Engineering, Inc. wnt I-a-aPMM TWI 1 1 P • 77PM Tr) - COf l 17 f`ni WTV CIJI I U=nl Tu -- - - -- ----•-••----• -I-- .... I----- ---------- - -1 - 3 PRO POSED CONSTRUCTION We have assumed that the proposed residence will consist of a two story, woad frame construction, with a walkout basement, on a concrete foundation, Loads are anticipated to be light, typical of residential construction. If the finalized plans differ significantly froth, the above understanding, they should notify us to reevaluate the r0conunendations of this report. FI LD INVESTIGATION The field investigation conducted on November ill, 1999, consisted of drilling, togging and sampling two test borings, The test boring locations are shown on Drawing No. 1. Drilling of the test borings was done with a 4-inch diameter, continuous flight, a power auger, on a track mounted drill rig, We shore the soil profiles of the test borings on the Subsurface Exploration Hogs, Figure No's one and two. Soil samples for laboratory soil analysis and observation were taken at selected intervals by advancing Standard Split Spoon and California Samplers with a 140-pound hammer, falling 30 inches. SUBSURFACE SOIL AND GROUNDWATER CONDITION the soil profiles encountered in the test borings were not uniforru.<Bonng No,,,1 had one foot of topsoil over brownish -red, sandy gravel with basalt boulders. Practical drill rig refusal was encountered in Boring No. 1 atK3:5,fe t on basalt rocks, Boring -No. 21had 2 feet of topsoil over light, reddish -brown, sandy clay. Basalt rocks were encountered at 19 to 25 feet, We did not encounter ground water at the time of drilling. We sampled the soil in the test borings at random intervals. The laboratory test results are shown on Figure No's 3 and 4. Preliminary Geologic Site Assessment and Preliminary Geotechnicai Engineering Study for Filing 36, 'was not available for our review. T.XP' F�ngiineerihats Ii u. mni I-P-,?TilMM TI-II I I P- 77PM Tn - P rni IWTV GKll 1 UPON TI-I PCtf G- a 4 FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATIONS The proposed residence should be supported with conventional type spread footings, designed for a maximum allowable soil bearing pressure of 3000 psf and a minimum dead load Of 1000 psf. The footings should be placed on the undisturbed, clayey -gravelly soils. Continuous foundation walls should be reinforced top and bottom to span an unsupported. length of at least 10 feet, A minimum of. 48 inches of backfill cover is recommended for frost Protection of the footing subsoils. The undersigned engineer should observe the foundation excavation to verify that the soil conditions are uniform throughout the foundation excavation. The foundation excavation should be free from excavation spoils, frost, organics and standing water. Voids left in the excavation, due to rock removal, should be filled with lean concrete. Footings should be constructed on a level surface. SLAB CONSTRUCTION The on -site soils exhibited low to modcratc swelling potential. The soils, however, were not uniform over the site. If the proposed slab -on grade is within the soils with low W moderate swelling potential, a structural fluor slab should be constructed. As another alternative, the soil beneath the slab can be overexcavated 3 feet and replaced with a structural fill, consisting of non swelling soil, approved by the engineer. They should backfill overexcavated soft spots and other underslab fill with non swelling soil, free from topsoil, organics, and rock fragments greater than 3 inches. The fill should be compacted to a minimum of 95 percent of the nmimurn standard Proctor density (ASTM D-699). The concrete slab should be constructed over a 4-inch layer of clean gravel consisting of - 3I4 inch gravel with at least 50% retatned on the No. 4 sieve and less than 3 percent passing the No. 200 sieve. They should reinforce the concrete slab -on -grade and score control joints according to the American Concrete Institute requirements and per the recommendations of the designer to reduce damage due to shrinkage. If the homeowner is aware Of the swelling soils and the damages LIT Fnsxineerina inr Nnu-?-?ROR THI I 1 P: - FAPM Tn: Par.1 F f ni 1WTY PWIJ WP7ni TW oC)r_7. CZ ' S associated with swelling soils are acceptable, slab on grade can, be constructed The concrete slab should be separated from the foundation walls and columns with expansion joints to allow for independent movement, RETAINING WALLS They should design foundation walls retaining earth and retaining structures that are laterally supported to resist an equivalent fluid density of 70 pef for an -at-rest" condition. Laterally unrestrained structures retaining the ern -site earth should be designed to resist an equivalent fluid density of 50 pef for the "active" case. The above design recommendations assume drained backfill conditions and a horizontal backfill surface. Surcharge loading due to adjacent structures, weight of temporary stored construction materials and equipment, inclined backfill and hydrostatic pressure due to undrained backfill should be incorporated in the design. They should try to prevent the buildup of hydrostatic pressure behind the retaining wall. >[ NDEltDRAIN SYSTEM To reduce the risk of surface water infiltrating the foundation subsoil, installation of a foundation perimeter drain is recommended. The foundation perimeter drain should consist of a 4-inch diameter- perforated pipe sloped to a suitable gravity outlet. The drain should slope at 1/4 inch per font if flexible or at 1 /S of an inch if rigid pipe is used. The bottom of the trench adjacent to the footing should be lined with a polyethylene moisture barrier glued to the foundation wall. The drain pipe should be placed over the moisture barrier and covered with a minimum of 6 inches of -3/4 inch free -draining granular material. Geo#extile (Mirafi 140N or equivalent) should be, used to cover the free -draining gravel to prevent siltation and clogging of the drain. The backfill above the drain should be granular material to within 2 feet of the ground surface to prevent a buildup of hydrostatic pressure, The top one foot of the backfill material should consist of a relatively impervious fill. The backfill shotild be sloping away from, the LKP Engineering, Inc. Kini 1-P-PfnfiM TWI I 1 P- 7PPM Tn- i=n .`I F rni [MTV PWIJ WPOI TI4 PAGP: F, building. SITE; GRADING AND DRAINAGr, In The site surrounding the building structure should slope away from the building in all directions. A minimum of 12 inches in the first 10 feet is recommended in unpaved areas, and three inches in the first 10 feet in paved areas. The top of the granular foundation backfill should be covered with a minimum of 1 foot of relatively impervious fill to reduce the potential Of surface water infiltrating the foundation subsoils. Surface water naturally draining toward the proposed building site or toward permanent cuts, should be diverted around and away from them by Means of drainage swales or other approved methods. The roof drains and downspouts should extend and discharge beyond the limits of the back1711. Exterior backfill should be compacted at or near the optimum moisture content to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density under pavement, sidewalk and patio areas and to at least 90a/a of the maximum standard. Proctor density under landscaped areas. Mcchanical methods of compaction should be used. Do not puddle the foundation excavation. DAWN IRRIGATION It is not recommended to introduce excess water to the foundation soils by installing sprinkler systems next to the building. The installation of the sprinkler heads should insure that the spray from the heads will not fall within 10 feet of foundation walls, porches or patio slabs. Lawn irrigation must be controlled. LIMITATION This report has been prepared according to locally accepted Professialnal Geotech lical Engineering standards for similar methods of testing and soil conditions at this time. There is no other warranty either expressed or implied. T.T�p F'ng'cnewring, iriU. mnt 1-D-Dfilnn Twi 1 1 D • 7DDM Tn • Cnr-1 C f-fill Ih ITV C'hll I U=nl TU mnr=' . -7 The findings and recommendations of this report are based on field exploration, laborataxy testing of samples obtainod at the specific locations shown on the Location Sketch, Drawing No.1 and on assumptions stated in the report. Soil conditions at other locations may vary, which may not become evident until the foundation excavation is completed, If sail or water conditions seem different from those described in this report we should be contacted immediately to reevaluate the recommendations of this report. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of 11+Ir. Derek Turner, Trustee, The Turner Revocable Trust, for the specific application to the proposed development on Lot 15, Block 2, Cordillera Filing No. 36, at Golden Bear Meadows, Eagle County, Colorado. Sincerely, �Qq A��'1��;,rr • r LKP FNGINEERIN r' pErgq&�, s Ir• *-. d,K 29526 ■ �a uiza Petrovska, ICE President C:W1yFIIckDrildatlW PDOChAY92S95W.rpi.wpd LISP Engineering, Inc. 7 wntl-P-PRP li TWI1 4P-7PPM Tfl-Faf'9 P rni[MTV F:MtJ Wl:nl TW G0I-•1:"•Q WntJ-P-rMMM TPI 1 1 P- 7QPM TI1- POf:.`I P MI IMTV PWI I I-Il=OI TW onr_c:. 0 DATE~ DRILLED: Novomberl$, 1999 BORING NO. I ELEVATION-. S S C�L:'P'I7-I BLOWS M A M DFSCRIPTiON OF MATERIAL LABORATORY FEET PER Fr. a P AND SAMPLE LOCATION TEST RESULTS REMARKS a L Topsail 6 inches of frost F-5 Brownish red sandy grave[ P; with basalt boulders sal at 3S feet No ground water encountered ... 15 --. 20 --30 ---- 35 LEGEND. 0 2-inch 0,1). California Liner Sample (relative►y undisturbed sample) IN 1-3/8-inch [.D. Split Spofln Sample, (disturbed ;ample) 241I2 D6vc sample blow count. Indicares that 24 blowy of a 140-pound hammer falling 30 inches were required to drive ilia California or the Split Spoon Sampler 12 inches. DD - Natural Dry Density (pol) MC - Natural Moisltxc Cgptent -200 - Percent pa9sing No. 200 sieve LL - Liquid Limit PI Plasticity Index G.W Ground Water LISP EI CINIEERING, INC. I SI BStRFACE EXPLORATION LOG mmi-P-PARR THI I 1 P: 79PM Tn: FAr.I F r ni INTV FNI J PP:01 TH PROJECT No. 99231 FIGURE; NO- I pn== - 9 M DATE DkILLED: Navctnhcr 18, 199V BORING NO. 2 ELEVATION: S S BLOWS Y M A ivl DESCRIPTION Or. MATERIAL LABORATORY pk`Er PER Fr, D P AND SAMPLE LOCATION TEST RESULTSREMARKS 0 L L E Topsoil inches offr4st -- Light reddish brown sandy cagy -- 5 30/12 C) Db-I I5.9 pcf - MC=12.7 % --- 36/12 iD DD=107.0 pcf --_ MC =17.1 % --- 50/7 D DD=131.7 pcf . 15 MC-7.3 % `- ----• 20 Rock Basalt rocks and boulders encountered at 19 feet - Rack - -- 25 Bottom of baring No Ground Water - )Encountered ---- 35 LEGEND: Q 74nch O.D. California Liftr Sumplo (rotatively undisturbed sample) ■ L-3/2-inch I.D. Split Spoon Sample (disturbed sample) 24/12 Drive sample blo+v count. Indicates that 24 blows of a 141-poured hummer faRing 3o inches were required to drift tN'California or the Split Spuatt Sampler 12 inches. DO Natural Dry Density (pcf) MC - Natural Moisture Content ('Ys) -200 - Percent passing No. 200 sieve LL - Liquid Lintit PI - Plasticity index Q-W - flruund Water LK P ENGINEERING, INC. ' SUBSLIRFAcIE EXPLORATION LOG PmEcTm- 99239 FICrURE NQ. 2 wnt 1-P-aMPM TWI I 9 P- 74PM Tn - Pnr-1 t= Ml IKITV PKII I WJ Cl TI.-1 Dnf-= • 4 4 -- - - . -- -- -- ----+------ I------ ---------- I Q U ~ r~ KP Engineering, Inc.. Swell — Consolidation Test Results wnt J-P-PORM TI-II I 1 P! 7qPM Tn! P7om F f" i INT`,' FNl J HFA1 TN PA(W .- 1 ? 7 TrA V! iZ 0 -yJ -2 4 -.3 -,2 r u D 7 . 0 4 O 4 at off, 1, o APPLIED PRESSUI?E -- ksf lv lcao Sample Of from -- Noturol Qry Unit Weight = pcf Ncturcl Moisture Content = percent +rcvxcr rtv.: Lift' Engineering, Inc. Swell — Consolidation Test Results ssas Actprf NU_ Kith J-P-PMMM TWI 1 1 P • Qri MM Tn • C0r-'I C r'f'II IKITV Ch11 1 Ul=nl TU rin . 4 � l mrl f Lz SLOPE AWAY FROM BUILDING P COVER BACKFILL i{4714 LINE FOOT OF RELATlV�ZY P d lYPERVIOU$ SOIL P h ' t GRANULAR F11.L hP e P e _ 4 p 0 U \� PLASTIC LINER- GL UCD TO THE FODUNNDATION WALL, (NO r NEEDED- WHEN (WOUND WATER is PRESE'NT) G_RAYEL TRIC'KNESS SHOULD- BE AT LEAST -94 INCHES AND SHOULD tNCREASE` IF HEA WER SEEPAGE IS. ANTICIPA TED F/L_TLR FABRIC (,VIRAFI 140N OR EQUIVALENT) COARSE GRAVEL, J14 INCH DIAM_ WITH LESS THAN 5%'FIII+ES 4--I1V0I/ DIAUETER PERFORA TED PIPE SLOPED TO A SUITA44E OUTLET A T 114 "- PER F'DOT FOR F4E,1 &F AND AT 1/6" PZ-R FOOT FOR RIGID PIPE PRl?$G�' NO.r PERIMETER DRAIN 9-0219 _ C1V3L/CE6TEUHhICItL LOT IS. &OGK Z, CORDILLERA *7LWa No. 36 SCA&E.' �T L e£ADNTSLKP Engineering, In C. CAGUNr. =40RO aara:: h,D. BOX 1452 Aver CO 6182Q PHLEPARED rL"e tot (970) 920-9080 fur (970) 9ZEi-Baas THF. PURNE'R REVOCABLE TRUST 5 mnL1-P-PMMM TWI 1 1 P- APIPMI TIC-PMr-1 G rni IKITV rKlt I WG01 TI-I var=C- 4 d ISDS Permit # 9,051 00 Date5/30103 ISDS Final Inspection COmDleteness Form 4. Tank is 156D gal. Tank Material ✓ Tank is located 12ft. and Lt degrees from (permanent landmark) Tank is located ft. and degrees from (permanent landmark) Tank set level. : Tank lids within 8" of finished grade. Size of field ft' units lineal ft. Technology CY1, L IJA; t.E 0 v �Cleanout is installed in between tank and house(+ 1/100ft). There is a "T" that goes down 14 inches in the inlet and outlet of the.tank. Inlet and outlet is sealed with tar--.tape,rubber gasket etc. ✓Teink las two compartments with the, :l:arger.:compartment closest to the house. CKeabure7 distance and relative direction.to.:.f eld _Depth of field.-:!) ft. ✓� Soil interface raked. Inspection portals at the end of each trench_:" ... w' Proper distance to setbacks. Chambers properly installed as per manufacturers specifications. (Chambers latched, end plates properly installed, rocks removed from trenches, etc.) Type of pipe used for building sewer line leach field Other Inspection meets requirements. Copy form to installer's file if recommendations for improvement were suggested. ACTION TAKEN: Setbacks Well Potable House Property Lake Dry Tank Drain Water Lines line Stream Gulch Field 100 25 20 10 50 25 10 10 Tank 50 10 5 10 50 10 * 10 o C A 12 "lows At y 17 0 2051-00 Tax #2107-163-02-010 JOB NAME Lot #15, Filing 36 ARDEN DEV. Block 2, Cordillera Subdivisio 166 Golden Ranr Driva - PA -.-A. JOB NO.��y`�� LOCATION BILL TO DATE( S ARTED 4 DATE COMPLETED DATE BILLED Gl l �,- U C) 1Z��� K c� w Y3') 0 3 — /L� d 2L /1 _z� d� 2 �,t_ I Soo Qo JOB COST SUMMARY I a �k e� TOTAL SELLING PRICE I-- S�, �I.I e I 1 _ �, { �t�{u TOTAL MATERIAL 1 / Q - (. S!:JO/`-WQ�O_-, �12.I6 3 J TOTAL LABOR ;D \O ��Gt �C L z.G C_ c'�.'L- �`- ��G� _ INSURANCE SALES TAX ^.t� #' 1(1� MISC. COSTS L� TOTAL JOB COST GROSS PROFIT LESS OVERHEAD COSTS % OF SELLING PRICE NET PROFIT JOB FOLDER Product 278 JOB FOLDER Printed in U.SA .Y v [ " F "w , ��..4 W*4 , ,L~ ° ^ a, -.. '^rod -•�y SOIL PROFILE PERCOLA 77ON TEST RESUL TS ► PROFILE HOLE - _ GRHl� SCAj,E Perc No. 1 Perc No. 2 Perc No. 3 0 to 2.5 feet Topsoil - 20 minutes per inch 20 minutes per inch 20 minutes per inch 2.5 to 8 feet Reddish brown, so 20 ; . o 10 : . •o ---- -- - - - - - \� _ silty -sandy clay \ Average percolation rate recommended for design T = 20 minutes per inch. No Ground Water No Bedrock i inch 20 !i \ tp \ \ COLD - - `r�\ e�A DESIGNCAL CULA 110NS - R DR/ Vc s C Design percolation rate T = 20 minutes per inch Number of bedrooms = 4 886 Maximum doily Flow = Qmax `rs \ 6 Omox = 4 bdrms x 2 persons/bdrm x 75 gallons/person/doy x 15OX 886 — —� Qmax = 900 gpd LOT 16 677C TA EP VQmax/24hrs x 30 hrs V = 1125 gallons / Use 1500 gallon, two compartment precast concrete tank by Copland Concrete or equivalent ABSORPTION AREA . CP� A = Qmax 5 x VT A = 900155 x 1/20 - 805 S. f. \` Based on Applicotio Rate. A = 900gpd/0.6 gpd/s. f. A = 1500 s. f. cs0 8g64 \ / i Standard /n6/trotor Chamber System in a trench con6guratron with on allowed 50 percent \ 8 6 reduction in the absorption area is recommended. �610—Acorrected = 750 s. f. 5� Surface area of one Infiltrctor Chamber = 15.5 s.f. b Use 48 /nfi/trotor Chambers in three trenches with 16 /nfi/trotors in each. N 1. The building sewer line from the house to the septic tank shall have a maximum slope of 114 inch per foot. Bends in the building sewer shall be limited to 45 degrees. 2. The septic tank shall be installed level. The tank shall have removable covers or manholes to within 8 inches of the finished grade, for inspection and cleaning. J. Excavate three (3) feet wide trenches. The horizontal distance from sidewa/l to sidewall between the trenches shall be a minimum of six (6) feet. 8856 SERIAL DISTRIBUT/ON 4. The bottom and the sidewalls of the trenches shall be raked to eliminate smearing. SEE DETAIL A -A ` I / 8854 5. Assemble and install the Infiltrator Chambers in the trenches accordingto the manufacturers I . , x • / / / /' �recommendations. 852 / INSPEC71oN PORT I / l •• 3" // / , / / / / / / / /' 6. Backfill the sidewall area with native on -site _ soil for proper support. - / 4' D/AM1BLDG SE➢ R 8� / / ' / / / / $41) um of h itcover.' STANDARD 1NFXMATOR TWICA AT 1/ft PER FOOTLOT 14 / � / 6 7. Backfill the trenches with a minim 12 inches of tamped so • / / / Ire, / / / 8. Avoid vehicle traffic over the system. • / / MAIN LEVEL 8861.5 /p� ! / / / / / / / 9. All installations shall meet the rules and regulations of the Eagle County Environmental Health Division, / LOWER LEVEL 8850.5 / $� / / / / / / / / / �a�2 Chapter 4, Individual Sewage Disposal Systems. 10. The Septic System Installation shall Go be inspected b the Design En meer rior to backfillin p ys P Y 9 9• P 9• 1 0,/ / / / / / 1500 GAL TWO COUP.L ON TWO COMPARTMENT j CONC SEPTIC TANK -.•�, - .•,r.; O O GAL - _ - LOT 15 � ...: i,.^�:�i � .,,�` / � _ ' / CONCRETE SEP TIC TANK coLn// / / / // / / // /� �/ �/ 8 / co / / // / // /// _ 8856 �/� o� ��g� // ,// /// /� // // //� ' // / /8818 00 00 / ,LO 11-1 00 P / / ! j 01 / Ile/ / / pIle m - o a 12 W _ o Q 0 0 Z 2 E. v1 C-D NA O _W __j _ u w �+1 OW2 Q CL Y Q1 W Wr A ` O V 00 Oo n� CD _ 00 Nr- v b(1 0) �x W •� v � o OH w 00 00 \ 0 ro 00 M N i U x (V .� rn m^ �V O r- � iu�rinmm�ny,/Z �,.p0 REsfs�.,,f% p ETigO•. F,p% 2952 DRAWN BY L.P. CHECKED BY L.P. PROxcT NO.: 2082 DATE.• 05-03-2000 DRAwNG Na. 2082SD.DWG SHEET 1 OF 1