Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
HomeMy WebLinkAbout3006 Frying Pan Rd - 246710200004Environmental Health
Department
P.O. Box 179
500 Broadway
Eagle, CO 81631-0179
Phone: (970) 328-8730
Fax: (970) 328-7185
Permit
Permit No. OWTS-022201-2021
Permit Type: OWTS Permit
Work Classification: New
Permit Status: Active
Issue Date: 11/24/2021 Expires: 12/11/2023
On-Site Wastewater
Treatement System
Project Address Parcel Number
3006 FRYING PAN RD, BASALT AREA,246710200004
Owner Information Address
Frying Pan Rendezvous, Llc Phone:
Cell:
Email: genshaft@wcrlegal.com
Inspections:
For Inspections Call: (970) 328-8755
and call the Design Engineer
Engineer Phone Email
Roaring Fork Engineering, Richard Goulding richardg@rfeng.biz
Contractor License Number Phone Email
Savage Excavation, LLC office@savagexco.com(970) 379-5421OWTSPL-000296-20
23
Permitted Construction / Details:
Install the OWTS exactly as depicted in the Roaring Fork Engineering design stamped, signed, and dated November
10, 2021 by Richard B. Goulding, PE. The system is designed to serve a three bedroom home and a bunk room, for a
design total of 5 bedrooms.
The OWTS consists of a 2,000 gallon two-compartment septic tank with an Orenco PF3005 high head effluent pump
installed in the second compartment with floats set to dose approximately 138 gallons of effluent to an automatic
distribution valve (ADV) set at the high point of the system and made accessible at grade. The ADV will alternated
dosed effluent between three over excavated beds each consisting of four rows of 14 Infiltrator Quick4 Plus set atop
two feet of secondary sand, for a total of 168 chambers, equivalent to 2,000 square feet of soil treatment area (STA).
The distribution laterals in the STA consist of 1.5 PVC pipe, with 1/8" orifices drilled every 4' of the entire length until
terminating at the flush valve assembly. Stake and maintain all setbacks for installation and inspection. Install
inspection ports on both ends of each trench.
NOTE, not in design but required: The effluent pipe must be encased for 5 feet on each side of the crossing with the
water line. A length of pipe with a minimum Schedule 40 rating of sufficient diameter to easily slide over and
completely encase the conveyance must be used. Rigid end caps of at least Schedule 40 rating [ASTM Standard D
3034-16 (2016 version)] must be glued or secured in a watertight fashion to the ends of the encasement pipe. A hole
of sufficient size to accommodate the pipe must be drilled in the lowest section of the rigid cap so that the
conveyance pipe rests on the bottom of the encasement pipe. The area in which the pipe passes through the end
caps must be sealed with an approved underground sealant compatible with the piping used.
NOTE: Gradation of the sand media use must be completed within one month prior to the installation and confirmed
with the design engineer. If the sand does not conform to secondary or preferred sand media requirements, it
cannot be used for the sand treatment media.
Contact Eagle County Environmental Health and the design engineer well in advance of requesting inspections prior
to backfilling any component of the OWTS. The design engineer is responsible for conducting all inspections
necessary to certify the installation and assure the functionality of the system. System certification, along with
photos and a record drawing is required to be submitted to and approved by Eagle County Environmental Health
prior to the use of the system.
Wednesday, October 11, 2023 1
THIS PERIMT EXPIRES BY TIME LIMITATION AND BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF THE WORK AUTHORIZED BY THE PERMIT IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 120 DAYS OF
ISSUANCE, OR BEFORE THE EXPIRATION OF AN ASSOCIATED BUILDING PERMIT
Issued by: Environmental Health Department, Eagle County, CO
Claire Lewandowski
Date
November 24, 2021
CONDITIONS
1.
2.ALL INSTALLATIONS MUST COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE EAGLE COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH AGENCY ON-SITE WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM
REGULATIONS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GRANTED IN CR.S. 25-10-101, et seq., AS AMENDED
3.THIS PERMIT IS VALID ONLY FOR PERFORMING WORK ON OWTS ASSOCIATED WITH STRUCTURES WHICH HAVE FULLY COMPLIED WITH COUNTY ZONING AND
BUILDING REQUIREMENTS CONNECTION TO, OR USE WITH, ANY DWELLING OR STRUCTURE NOT APPROVED BY THE ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENTS
SHALL AUTOMATICALLY BE A VIOLATION OF A REQUIREMENT OF THE PERMIT AND WILL RESULT IN BOTH LEGAL ACTION AND REVOCATION OF THE PERMIT
4.1.6(A)(1) EAGLE COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH AGENCY ON-SITE WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM REGULATIONS REQUIRES ANY PERSON WHO CONSTRUCTS,
ALTERS OR INSTALLS AN ON-SITE WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM TO BE LICENSED
Wednesday, October 11, 2023 2
Inspection Result
Eagle County, Colorado
P.O. Box 179 500 Broadway Eagle, CO
Phone: (970) 328-8730 Fax: (970) 328-7185
IVR Phone: 1-866-701-3307
Inspection Number: BASALT AREA - 3006
FRYING PAN - 516812
Permit Number: OWTS-022201-2021
Inspection Date: 08/12/2022
Inspector:
Permit Type: OWTS Permit
Inspection Type: OWTS Final Inspection
Work Classification: NewOwner:Frying Pan Rendezvous, Llc
Job Address:3006 FRYING PAN RD IVR Pin Number:193928
BASALT AREA, CO Project:<NONE>
Parcel Number:246710200004
Contractor:Phone: / Cell:
Inspection Status: Approved
Inspection Notes
Inspector Comments
Added Item: Septic Tank
Inspected on 10/17/23- Meets requirements. Floats and alarms were tested and working.
Handles to float tree and effluent biofilter must be extended for east reach within the risers. Photos
requested.
Added Item: Record Drawing
Received 11/1/2023.
Added Item: Record Photos
Received 11/1/2023.
Added Item: Final Certification Letter
Received 11/1/2023.
Added Item: Pressure Distribution
Observed the hydraulic loading test on 10/25/23- ADV and all lines of each STA were observed
pressurized and functioning as designed. ADV was installed at the high point of the system and drain
back was observed.
Added Item: General Plan
Observed in conformance with General Plan.
Added Item: Soil Treatment Area (STA)
Thursday, November 30, 2023
For more information visit: http://www.eaglecounty.us
Page 1 of 2
Inspected 8/12/2022 - 4 rows of 13 had been installed instead of 14. Correction required. 10/17/23 -
Corrections verified.
Added Item: Identification of Systems Contractor
Savage Excavation was the licensed installer.
Thursday, November 30, 2023
For more information visit: http://www.eaglecounty.us
Page 2 of 2
Onsite Wastewater System Certification
To: Eagle County Environmental Health Department
From: Tyler Stevens P.E.
Re: Coffman’s Corner
3006 Frying Pan Rd.
Eagle County, CO
‐ Final Septic Approval
Date: October 31, 2023
The Onsite Wastewater Treatment System (OWTS) at 3006 Frying Pan Rd. was constructed and installed
throughout 2021, 2022 and 2023 in general accordance with the engineered design that was submitted
to and approved by the Eagle County Environmental Health Department. The equipment installation was
done by Valley Precast and a final inspection was conducted by Tyler Stevens, P.E., of Roaring Fork
Engineering on October 31, 2023. The lids of the septic tank were removed and the sanitary tees and
dosing pumps were observed and inspected. All proposed pumps, valves, fittings and equipment for the
system were present.
Each row of chambers was confirmed to have inspection ports and blow off risers. Below are some photos
taken during the site visit. The contractor has been in correspondence with the county and has been
providing the requested construction documentation and photos. Large equipment and stockpiles were
kept off the field for the duration of construction.
During the final inspection the pumps were cycled, the ADV was observed operating correctly and the
blowoff valves at the end of the field were opened to ensure flows adequately pressurized the field.
Everything operated as intended.
Please call with any questions: 970‐379‐2687
Sincerely,
Tyler Stevens, P.E.
Onsite Wastewater Treatment System Report
COFFMAN’S CORNER
3006 FRYING PAN RD.
EAGLE COUNTY, CO
November 10, 2021
Prepared by
Roaring Fork Engineering
592 Highway 133
Carbondale, CO 8162
1
Table of Contents
Table of Contents .......................................................................................................................................... 1
1.0 General .............................................................................................................................................. 2
2.0 Waste Water Strength and Flows ...................................................................................................... 2
3.0 Minimum Distances Between Components of the Onsite Wastewater Treatment System and
Physical Features .......................................................................................................................................... 3
4.0 Septic Tank Sizing ............................................................................................................................ 4
5.0 Soil Conditions .................................................................................................................................. 5
6.0 Soil Treatment Area Sizing ............................................................................................................... 8
7.0 Distribution and Dosing .................................................................................................................... 9
7.1 Head Loss ...................................................................................................................................... 9
7.2 Pump Selection ............................................................................................................................. 9
8.0 Maintenance ...................................................................................................................................... 9
Appendix A: Completed OWTS Permit Application ................................................................................ 1
Appendix B: Geotechnical Report ............................................................................................................ 2
Appendix C: Roaring Fork Engineering Soil Logs ................................................................................... 3
Appendix D: Design Flows and STA Sizing ............................................................................................ 4
Appendix E: Dosing Volumes .................................................................................................................. 5
Appendix F: Pump Curves ........................................................................................................................ 6
Appendix G: Product Information. ........................................................................................................... 7
Appendix H: Drawings ............................................................................................................................. 8
2
1.0 General
The property address is 3006 Frying Pan Rd. Basalt, Colorado. This property is also referred to as
Coffman’s Corner. The property is on the Frying Pan River about three miles east of downtown Basalt.
The parcel number is 2467-102-00-004. The property is 5 acres and is located in Eagle County
Figure 1 – Vicinity Map
The property is surrounded by Basalt State Wildlife area and Colorado Parks and Wildlife land. The
Frying Pan Road runs through the north of the property while the frying pan river flows to the south of
the property. There is a 75-foot highwater set back that also exists on the property. The proposed
development will consist of a new custom home with a separate garage and various connected cabins. All
the dwellings will connect to the same Onsite Wastewater Treatment System (OWTS).
The septic system will be designed in accordance with the Colorado Department of Public Health and
Environment’s (CDPHE) Regulation 43 and Eagle County regulations. A Colorado Department of Public
Health and Environment (CDPHE) permit is not required for this size of system.
2.0 Waste Water Strength and Flows
The waste water design flows were calculated using section 43.6 of the Eagle County On-site Wastewater
Treatment System Regulations. Table 6-1, Single-Family Residential Design Flows, was used to
determine the amount of people per bedroom and the design flows in gallons per day. The design flow
used per person is 75 gallons per day. For homes with more than three bedrooms the assumed number of
persons shall be two people per bedroom for the first three bedrooms, plus one additional person for each
bedroom more than the first three bedrooms.
3
Figure 2 - Table 6-1 (Eagle County OWTS Regulations)
The proposed home has a three bed rooms and a bunk room. Counting the bunk room as two bedrooms
this bring the total number of bedrooms to 5. According to table 6-1 this brings the Design Flow to 600
gal/day.
A septic tank is going to be implemented for the single-family home so the effluent strength is considered
to be Treatment Level 1 (TL1).
3.0 Minimum Distances Between Components of the Onsite Wastewater
Treatment System and Physical Features
Section 43.7 was used to determine the minimum distances between components of the OWTS and the
proposed well, river, water storage tanks and water lines. Setbacks are shown on the site OWTS plan and
all setback requirements are met. Below is that 7-1 showing the required setbacks.
4
Figure 3 - TABLE 7-1 (Eagle County OWTS Regulations)
4.0 Septic Tank Sizing
Septic tank sizing was calculated using section 43.9 of the Eagle County On-site Wastewater Treatment
System Regulations. Septic tanks will be used to bring the effluent to Treatment Level 1 (TL1).
Table 9-1 of the Eagle County Public Health Agency’s Onsite Water Treatment System regulations shows
the required tank sizing for new residential installations.
Figure 4 - Table 9-1 (Eagle County OWTS Regulations)
To provide 48 hours of retention time this requires the minimum tank size to be 2,000 gallons. A two-
compartment precast tank is specified in the design with the dosing pump housed in the second chamber.
The first compartment of this tank is 1,500 while this second comportment is 500 gallons. This satisfies
the requirement that the first compartment must hold no less than one-half of the required effective
volume.
5
5.0 Soil Conditions
Two soil profile pits were excavated to approximately a depth of nine feet in the vicinity of the proposed
septic field on May 4th, 2021 and observed by Roaring Fork Engineering (RFE). Visual and tactile
observations were performed on the soil. The profile pits included approximately 6-12 inches of
organics/topsoil overlaying medium dense to dense silty sand and gravel soils. No groundwater was
observed within the soil profile pits. No limiting layers were encounter. Soil logs can be found within the
appendix. Below are photos of the two pits.
Figure 5 - Profile Pit 1 Figure 6 - Profile Pit 2
Soil samples of the native material were taken from both soil profile pits, so gradation testing could be
performed. Below is a photo of the sieve sample. A 3/4"-inch sieve was used to separate the large rock
and a finer No. 10 Sieve was used to separate the fines. It appears that over 35% of the was >2mm putting
the soil in the Type R category according to table 10-1A.
Figure 7 -Soil Pit 1 Sieve Analysis Figure 8 - Soil Pit 2 Sieve Analysis
6
The soil passing the No. 10 sieve was tested according to the USDA NRCS Guide to Texture by Feel. The
results showed the soil was a Sandy Clay Loam (Type 3A Soils) since it remained in a ball when
squeezed, formed a 1-2” ribbon while feeling gritty.
Figure 9 - Profile Pit 1 Ribbon Test Figure 10 - Profile Pit 2 Ribbon Test
7
Given this soil type and an effluent treatment Level of 1, Table 10-1 of the Eagle County Public Health
Agency On-Site Wastewater Treatment System Regulations indicates the LTAR (Long Term
Acceptanceate) shall be 0.30 gallons per day per square foot.
Figure 11 - Table 10-1 (Eagle County OWTS Regulations)
8
Figure 12 - Table 10-1a (Eagle County OWTS Regulations).
Using tables 10-1 and 10-1A for a Treatment Level 1 effluent, Type R and Type 3A soil with an LTAR of
0.30 a 2-foot layer of sand is needed below the Soil Treatment Area. This will be specified in the design
along with the sand gradation specification.
A separate geotechnical report was produced on June 4, 2021 by Kumar and Associates. The report is
included in the Appendix. Four separate pits were dug. Each pit log shows there is about 1-4 feet of top
soil over laying sand and gravels or cobbles. In the area of the proposed soil treatment area the soils were
similar.
6.0 Soil Treatment Area Sizing
Using the design flow of 600 gallons per day and the LTAR of 0.30 gallons per day per square foot, it
was determined that the minimum STA is 2,000 square feet for bed configurations. No sizing
adjustments are permitted as the soil treatment area is in Type R soils. The field will still be pressure
dosed and chambers shall be utilized.
168 Quick 4 Plus infiltrators will be arranged in three beds. Each bed will have 4 rows with 44
infiltrators each. Each bed does not exceed the maximum width of 12 feet and will be spaced 6 feet from
the adjacent beds.
9
7.0 Distribution and Dosing
The soil treatment area will be pressure dosed. The second chamber of the second 1,500-gallon tank will
house the Orenco pump and float tree. The pump will discharge into a pressurized 1.5-inch PVC
transmission line up to the ADV (Alternating Distribution Valve). From the ADV two separate
distribution 1.5-inch PVC pipes will convey effluent to the 1.5-inch PVC manifolds and laterals. The
laterals run the entire length of the chambers and are also 1.5-inch PVC pipe that are suspended from the
top of the chambers. The laterals shall have one eighth of an inch (1/8”) orifice spaced every four feet
(4’).
The transmission pipe running up to the ADV is sloped back toward the tank so the effluent will drain
back into the pump basin when the pump shuts off. This is done to prevent freezing and eliminate
stagnant fluid sitting in the line.
A dosing volume was determined by using the industry standard of five to seven times the lateral piping
volumes plus any drain back for a total of 138 gallons per dose. The elevations of the floats in the dosing
chamber shall be set 14 inches apart to meet this dosing volume. The pump vault will house the Orenco
pump and float tree. See the appendix for dosing calculations and OWTS drawings.
7.1 Head Loss
The Orenco pump selection software was used to determine the total head loss for the system. Using the
distribution pipe material, size and length, orifice size and spacing, bends, the max elevation lift, the
manifold and the lateral piping configurations, a system curve was created. From this, the minimum
pumping requirements were determined. A system curve is provided in the appendix.
7.2 Pump Selection
The pump selected for the system is the Orenco PF3005 high head effluent pump. A pump curve, along
with product information, can be found within the appendix
8.0 Maintenance
The Owner will follow the operation and maintenance required in Section 43.14 of the Eagle County On-
site Wastewater Treatment System Regulations. Below is a maintenance schedule for the OWTS.
Maintenance and Cleaning Frequency
Type of Component Inspection/Maintenance Cleaned or Pumped
Septic Tanks Every 2 Years Every 2 Years, or As
Needed
Absorption Areas Every 6 Months N.A.
Dosing or Pumping Chambers Every 6 Months Every 4
Years
10
Responsibility: The owner must be responsible for maintenance of an OWTS unless the responsibility has
been contractually assigned to a tenant or a third party or a public, quasi-public, or political subdivision.
Referencing section 43.16.D.4 of the Pitkin County Onsite Wastewater Treatment Regulations, the
Owner’s responsibilities for operation and maintenance of the system include:
1. Ensure OWTS is operating, maintained and performing according to the required
standards for the designated treatment level;
2. Maintain an active service contract with a maintenance provider at all times; and
3. Each time his/her current contract with a maintenance provider is renewed or
replaced, send a copy to PCPH within 30 days of signing.
Additional information about OWTS maintenance and operation can be found in section 43.16. of the
Pitkin County Onsite Wastewater Treatment Regulations.
Appendix A: Completed OWTS Permit Application
***************************************************************************
APPLICATION FOR ON-SITE WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM (OWTS) PERMIT
INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS MAY NOT BE ACCEPTED (SITE PLAN MUST BE INCLUDED)
FEE SCHEDULE
APPLICATION FEE FOR NEW OWTS OR MAJOR REPAIRS $800.00 MINOR REPAIR FEE $400.00
Fee includes the design review, permitting and maintenance of OWTS records
Make all checks payable to: Eagle County Treasurer
Property Owner: _______________________________________Phone: ________________________
Owner Mailing Address: ________________________________ email: _________________________
Professional Engineer: __________________________________ Phone: ________________________
Applicant / Contact Person: ______________________________Phone: ________________________
Licensed Systems Contractor Name / Company: ___________________________________________
Contractor Mailing Address: _________________________________ Contractor License #:_______
Contractor Phone Number: ________________________ email: ______________________________
OWTS Permit Application is for: ____ New Installation ____ Alteration ____ Repair
Tax Parcel Number: _________________________________ Lot Size: ________________________
Assessor’s Link: www.eaglecounty.us/patie/
Physical Address: _____________________________________________________________________
Legal Description: ____________________________________________________________________
Building Type: _____ Residential / Single Family
_____ Residential / Multi Family
_____ Commercial / Industrial
Number of Bedrooms: ______
Number of Bedrooms: ______
Type of Use: _______________
*As of 06/27/2014, all systems require design by a Registered Professional Engineer.
Type of Water Supply: ____ Private Well ____ Spring ____ Surface ____ Public
If Public, Name of Supplier: ____________________________________________________________
Applicant Signature: ______________________________________Date:_______________________
****************************************************************************
Office Use Only: OWTS PERMIT # __________________ BUILDING PERMIT # ____________________
Amount Paid: ___________ Receipt #: ___________ Check #: ___________ Date: ______________
DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
(970) 328-8755
FAX: (970) 328-8788
TOLL FREE: 800-225-6136
www.eaglecounty.us
P.O. Box 179
500 Broadway
Eagle, CO 81631
environment@eaglecounty.us
Appendix B: Geotechnical Report
5020 County Road 154
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
phone: (970) 945-7988
fax: (970) 945-8454
email: kaglenwood@kumarusa.com
www.kumarusa.com Office Locations: Denver (HQ), Parker, Colorado Springs, Fort Collins, Glenwood Springs, and Summit County, Colorado
June 4, 2021
CCY Architects
Attn: Matt Qual
P.O. Box 529
Basalt, Colorado 81621
mqual@ccyarchitects.com
Project No. 21-7-361
Subject: Subsoil Study for Foundation Design, Proposed Residential Development,
3006 Frying Pan Road, Eagle County, Colorado
Dear Matt:
As requested, Kumar & Associates, Inc. performed a subsoil study for design of foundations at
the subject site. The study was conducted in accordance with our agreement for geotechnical
engineering services to CCY Architects dated April 12, 2021. The data obtained and our
recommendations based on the proposed construction and subsurface conditions encountered are
presented in this report.
Proposed Construction: The proposed residential development will include a main cabin,
master cabin, guest cabin, detached garage and fishing cabin located on the site as shown on
Figure 1. Ground floors are assumed to be a combination of slab-on-grade and structural over
crawlspace. Cut depths are expected to range between about 2 to 8 feet. Foundation loadings for
this type of construction are assumed to be relatively light and typical of the proposed type of
construction.
If building conditions or foundation loadings are significantly different from those described
above, we should be notified to re-evaluate the recommendations presented in this report.
Site Conditions: The subject site was vacant at the time of our field exploration. The ground
surface was sloping down to the south at a grade of about 5 to 10 percent. The Frying Pan River
flows around the edge of the lot on the south/downhill side. Vegetation consists of grass and
scattered fir, cottonwood and old scrub oak trees. The site was previously developed with a
small cabin and a driveway. The cabin had been razed prior to our study and the driveway was
unmaintained. The unpaved driveway was constructed with minor cut and fill.
Subsurface Conditions: The subsurface conditions at the site were evaluated by excavating
four exploratory pits at the approximate locations shown on Figure 1. The logs of the pits are
presented on Figure 2. The subsoils encountered, below about 1 to 3½ feet of topsoil, consist of
- 2 -
Kumar & Associates, Inc. ® Project No. 21-7-361
medium dense to dense silty sand and gravel soils down to the maximum explored depth of
10½ feet. Pit 2 encountered primarily sand soils with limited gravel and cobbles. Septic profile
pits were excavated on the west side of the lot at the time of our field exploration and exposed
similar subsoil conditions. The septic profile pits were logged and sampled by a representative
of Roaring Fork Engineering. Results of a gradation analysis performed on a sample of silty
sand and gravel (minus 3-inch fraction) obtained from the site are presented on Figure 3. No free
water was observed in the pits at the time of excavation and the soils were slightly moist to
moist.
Foundation Recommendations: Considering the subsoil conditions encountered in the
exploratory pits and the nature of the proposed construction, the buildings can be founded with
spread footings bearing on the natural soils with a risk of settlement if the bearing soils become
wet. Spread footings placed on the undisturbed natural soil designed for an allowable soil
bearing pressure of 2,000 psf for support of the proposed residential development. Footings
should be a minimum width of 18 inches for continuous walls and 2 feet for columns. Loose
disturbed soils and existing fill encountered at the foundation bearing level within the excavation
should be removed and the footing bearing level extended down to the undisturbed natural soils.
Exterior footings should be provided with adequate cover above their bearing elevations for frost
protection. Placement of footings at least 42 inches below the exterior grade is typically used in
this area. Continuous foundation walls should be reinforced top and bottom to span local
anomalies such as by assuming an unsupported length of at least 12 feet. Foundation walls
acting as retaining structures should be designed to resist a lateral earth pressure based on an
equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 45 pcf for the on-site subsoils as backfill.
Floor Slabs: The natural on-site soils, exclusive of topsoil, are suitable to support lightly to
moderately loaded slab-on-grade construction. To reduce the effects of some differential
movement, floor slabs should be separated from all bearing walls and columns with expansion
joints which allow unrestrained vertical movement. Floor slab control joints should be used to
reduce damage due to shrinkage cracking. The requirements for joint spacing and slab
reinforcement should be established by the designer based on experience and the intended slab
use. A minimum 4-inch layer of free-draining gravel should be placed beneath slabs-on-grade to
facilitate drainage. This material should consist of minus 2-inch aggregate with less than 50%
passing the No. 4 sieve and less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve.
All fill materials for support of floor slabs should be compacted to at least 95% of maximum
standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Required fill can consist of the on-
site soils devoid of vegetation, topsoil and oversized rock.
- 3 -
Kumar & Associates, Inc. ® Project No. 21-7-361
Underdrain System: Although free water was not encountered during our exploration, it has
been our experience in the area that local perched groundwater can develop during times of
heavy precipitation or seasonal runoff. Frozen ground during spring runoff can create a perched
condition. We recommend below-grade construction, such as retaining walls, deep crawlspace
and basement areas (if any), be protected from wetting and hydrostatic pressure buildup by an
underdrain system.
If installed, the drains should consist of drainpipe placed in the bottom of the wall backfill
surrounded above the invert level with free-draining granular material. The drain should be
placed at each level of excavation and at least 1 foot below lowest adjacent finish grade and
sloped at a minimum 1% to a suitable gravity outlet. Free-draining granular material used in the
underdrain system should contain less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve, less than 50% passing
the No. 4 sieve and have a maximum size of 2 inches. The drain gravel backfill should be at
least 1½ feet deep.
Surface Drainage: The following drainage precautions should be observed during construction
and maintained at all times after the residential development has been completed:
1) Inundation of the foundation excavations and underslab areas should be avoided
during construction.
2) Exterior backfill should be adjusted to near optimum moisture and compacted to
at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density in pavement and slab areas
and to at least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density in landscape areas.
Free-draining wall backfill should be covered with filter fabric and capped with
about 2 feet of the on-site, finer graded soils to reduce surface water infiltration.
3) The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be sloped to
drain away from the foundation in all directions. We recommend a minimum
slope of 12 inches in the first 10 feet in unpaved areas and a minimum slope of
3 inches in the first 10 feet in pavement and walkway areas. A swale may be
needed uphill of the proposed buildings to direct surface runoff around the
structures.
4) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all
backfill.
Limitations: This study has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical
engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no warranty either
express or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report are based
Kumar & Associates
Kumar & Associates
Kumar & Associates
TABLE 1
SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
Project No. 21-7-361
SAMPLE LOCATION NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT
NATURAL DRY DENSITY
GRADATION
PERCENT PASSING NO. 200 SIEVE
ATTERBERG LIMITS UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH SOIL TYPE PIT DEPTH GRAVEL SAND LIQUID LIMIT PLASTIC INDEX (%) (%)
(ft) (%) (pcf) (%) (%) (psf)
1 5 to 7 3.4 43 40 17 Silty Sand and Gravel
2 4 to 4½ 11.1 29 22 3 Silty Sand
4 6½ to 7½ 3.4 43 45 12 Silty Sand and Gravel
Appendix C: Roaring Fork Engineering Soil Logs
Appendix D: Design Flows and STA Sizing
C H A M B E R D I S T R I B U T I O N M E D I A W O R K S H E E T
The minimum required number of chambers are based on the wastewater flow, LTAR and method of effluent application entered in TAB 1. To change any of those parameters, such
as using pressure dosing instead of siphons just click HERE to return to TAB 1 and make changes ‐ this sheet will automatically recalculate with that info.
* NOTE: FOR HLT SYSTEMS ‐ WHICH MUST BE PRESSURE DOSED ‐ NO ADDITIONAL SIZING REDUCTIONS ARE PERMITTED FOR USE OF CHAMBERS PER SECTION 16.1.I
FOR HLT EFFLUENT*INSTRUCTIONS: Determine the STA from the tables at left that reflects the STA type and
T R E N C H S T A 1600 wastewater TL and select it from the drop down list in the YELLOW box below:
B E D S T A 2000
2000
FOR TL1 EFFLUENT
T R E N C H S T A 1400
B E D S T A 1680
MINIMUM REQUIRED NUMBER OF UNITS ARE SHOWN IN TABLES BELOW ‐ FOR EQUAL EFFLUENT DISTRIBUTION THE NUMBER OF CHAMBERS IN EACH BED ROW OR TRENCH MUST BE
EQUAL, WHICH MAY REQUIRE MORE CHAMBERS THAN SHOWN BELOW. DISTRIBUTION LINES ARE REQUIRED WITHIN THE CHAMBERS.
ADS PIPE INC UNITS INFILTRATOR SYSTEMS INC UNITS
Arc 18 (18" wide trench)286 Quick 4 Plus Standard 167
Arc 24 (24" wide trench)222 Quick 4 Plus Low Profile 167
Arc 36 143 Quick 4 Plus High Capacity 167
Arc 36 HC 133 RESERVED
Arc 36 LP 143 RESERVED
RESERVED RESERVED
RESERVED
RESERVED
#rows #infiltrators/row
Width of
System (ft)
Length of
System (ft)
Length of
System + End
Caps (ft)
Total
Infiltrators
Excavation
Area (ft2)
Total Area
of System
(ft2)
1 167 3 668 671 167 2012 2004
2 84 12 336 339 168 2024 4032
3 56 21 224 227 168 2024 4704
4 42 30 168 171 168 2024 5040
5 34 39 136 139 170 2048 5304
6 28 48 112 115 168 2024 5376
7 24 57 96 99 168 2024 5472
8 21 66 84 87 168 2024 5544
9 19 75 76 79 171 2060 5700
10 17 84 68 71 170 2048 5712
11 16 93 64 67 176 2120 5952
12 14 102 56 59 168 2024 5712
13 13 111 52 55 169 2036 5772
14 12 120 48 51 168 2024 5760
#rows #infiltrators/row
Width of
System (ft)
Length of
System (ft)
Length of
System + End
Caps (ft)
Total
Infiltrators
Excavation
Area (ft2)
1 167 3 668 671 167 2012
2 84 6 336 339 168 2032
3 56 9 224 227 168 2040
4 42 12 168 171 168 2048
5 34 15 136 139 170 2080
6 28 18 112 115 168 2064
7 24 21 96 99 168 2072
8 21 24 84 87 168 2080
9 19 27 76 79 171 2124
10 17 30 68 71 170 2120
11 16 33 64 67 176 2200
12 14 36 56 59 168 2112
13 13 39 52 55 169 2132
14 12 42 48 51 168 2128
15 12 45 48 51 180 2280
16 11 48 44 47 176 2240
17 10 59 40 43 170 2496
18 10 63 40 43 180 2644
19 9 66 36 39 171 2528
20 9 70 36 39 180 2662
21 8 73 32 35 168 2504
22 8 77 32 35 176 2624
23 8 80 32 35 184 2744
24 7 84 28 31 168 2530
Trench System
Bed System
B A S I C S T A C A L C U L A T O R
Except for Soil Type 0, the LTAR may vary, depending on the Soil Type and the Treatment Level of the effluent.
You may adjust the LTAR for Soil Types 1‐5 by choosing different Treatment Levels, but for Soil Type "0" the LTAR
will always be "1" regardless of Treatment Level. Remember that HLT systems are always pressure‐dosed, so no
additional sizing reductions are given for Manufactured or Chamber distribution media for HLT systems.
DISCLAIMER: the OWTS Regulations may limit sizing options based on types of systems, effluent application
methods, treatment levels, etc. Not all of the sizing options shown in the calculated tables will apply
to every system. These calculations must be verified by the design engineer.
Enter Design Flow (gpd) 600 Total Structures Square Footages 6,000
Minimum Tank Size 1200 Number of Persons 8
Select LTAR 0.3 Flow Per Person 75
Select Effluent Application Factor 1 Enter Additional Flow in GPD 0
FOR HLT SYSTEMS w / ANY DIST. MEDIA See Distrbution Media Tabs below for design details
T R E N C H S T A 1600
B E D S T A 2000
FOR TL1 w / GRAVEL DISTIRBUTION MEDIA CLICK HERE to go to / return to this TAB
T R E N C H S T A 2000
B E D S T A 2400
FOR TL1 w / MANUFACTURED DIST. MEDIA CLICK HERE to go to / return to this TAB
T R E N C H S T A 1800
B E D S T A 2160
FOR TL1 w / CHAMBER DISTRIBUTION MEDIA CLICK HERE to go to / return to this TAB
T R E N C H S T A 1400
B E D S T A 1680
Appendix E: Dosing Volumes
Dosing Calculations
Project Name: 3006 Frying Pan Rd.
Project Number:2021-24
Date: 6-18-2021
By: TRS
1 Calculate total STA pipe length
Variable Description Notes
Number of Zones 3
Number of Laterals per Zone 4
Number of Infiltrators per Lateral 14
Number of Infiltrators 168
Llateral Lateral Length 56 ft = #infiltrators * 4 ft/infiltrator
Ltotal-lateral Total Pipe Length Per Zone 224 ft
2 Calculate approach pipe system volume
Pipe Material PVC
Pipe Type Schedule 40
Lapproach Approach Pipe Length 2,247 ft
φpipe Pipe Diameter 1.50 in According to manufacturer
ID Pipe Inner Diameter 1.610 in According to manufacturer
Vapproach Pipe Volume 31.767 cf = Ltotal*0.25* Π * (ID[in]/12)2
Vapproach Pipe Volume 237.6 gal = Vlateral [cf] * 7.48 gal/cf
3 Calculate manifold pipe system volume
Pipe Material PVC
Pipe Type Schedule 40
Lmanifold Approach Pipe Length 12 ft
φpipe Pipe Diameter 1.50 in According to manufacturer
ID Pipe Inner Diameter 1.500 in According to manufacturer
Vmanifold Pipe Volume 0.147 cf = Ltotal*0.25* Π * (ID[in]/12)2
Vmanifold Pipe Volume 1.1 gal = Vlateral [cf] * 7.48 gal/cf
4 Calculate lateral pipe system volume
Pipe Material PVC According to Pitkin County Regulations
Pipe Type Schedule 40
Lmanifold Approach Pipe Length 224 ft
φpipe Pipe Diameter 1.50 in According to manufacturer
ID Pipe Inner Diameter 1.500 in According to manufacturer
Vlateral Pipe Volume 2.749 cf = Ltotal*0.25* Π * (ID[in]/12)2
Vlateral Pipe Volume 20.6 gal = Vlateral [cf] * 7.48 gal/cf
5 Calculate total pipe volume
Vtotal Total Pipe Volume 259.3 gal = Vapproach + Vmanifold + Vlateral
6 Calculate dosing/pumping volume required
φvault Height 4.00 ft Second chamber (max water elevation)
φvault Width 5.50 ft Second chamber
φvault Length 2.87 ft Second chamber
V/ftchamber Volume of Chamber Per Foot 118 gal/ft According to details and manufacturer
Vdosing Estimated Dosing Volume 143.93 gal Rule of thumb, 7 times STA piping system volume
Hcalculated Calculated Operating Depth 1.22 ft = Vdosing / V/ftchamber
Hcalculated Calculated Operating Depth 14.63 in = Hcalculated [ft] * 12in/ft
Hactual
Actual Operating Depth
Drawdown 14.00 in
Vdosing Actual Dose Volume 138 gal = V/ftchamber * Hactual
P:\2021\24-Coffman's Corner (3006 Frying Pan)\12-OWTS\3006 Frying Pan Rd. - OWTS Calculations1.xlsx
Printed: 11/23/2021
Page 1 of 1
Appendix F: Pump Curves
Pump Selection for a Pressurized System - Single Family Residence Project
Parameters
Discharge Assembly Size
Transport Length Before Valve
Transport Pipe Class
Transport Line Size
Distributing Valve Model
Transport Length After Valve
Transport Pipe Class
Transport Pipe Size
Max Elevation Lift
Manifold Length
Manifold Pipe Class
Manifold Pipe Size
Number of Laterals per Cell
Lateral Length
Lateral Pipe Class
Lateral Pipe Size
Orifice Size
Orifice Spacing
Residual Head
Flow Meter
'Add-on' Friction Losses
1.50
150
40
1.50
6403
70
40
1.50
30
10
40
1.50
12
56
40
1.50
1/8
4
5
None
0
inches
feet
inches
feet
inches
feet
feet
inches
feet
inches
inches
feet
feet
inches
feet
Calculations
Minimum Flow Rate per Orifice
Number of Orifices per Zone
Total Flow Rate per Zone
Number of Laterals per Zone
% Flow Differential 1st/Last Orifice
Transport Velocity Before Valve
Transport Velocity After Valve
0.43
60
25.9
4
0.6
4.1
4.1
gpm
gpm
%
fps
fps
Frictional Head Losses
Loss through Discharge
Loss in Transport Before Valve
Loss through Valve
Loss in Transport after Valve
Loss in Manifold
Loss in Laterals
Loss through Flowmeter
'Add-on' Friction Losses
2.0
6.0
5.8
2.8
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
feet
feet
feet
feet
feet
feet
feet
feet
Pipe Volumes
Vol of Transport Line Before Valve
Vol of Transport Line After Valve
Vol of Manifold
Vol of Laterals per Zone
Total Vol Before Valve
Total Vol After Valve
15.9
7.4
1.1
23.7
15.9
32.1
gals
gals
gals
gals
gals
gals
Minimum Pump Requirements
Design Flow Rate
Total Dynamic Head
25.9
51.9
gpm
feet
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Net Discharge (gpm)
PumpData
PF3005 High Head Effluent Pump
30 GPM, 1/2HP
115/230V 1Ø 60Hz, 200V 3Ø 60Hz
Legend
System Curve:
Pump Curve:
Pump Optimal Range:
Operating Point:
Design Point:
Appendix G: Product Information.
Technical Data Sheet
Orenco Systems® Inc. , 814 Airway Ave., Sutherlin, OR 97479 USA • 800-348-9843 • 541-459-4449 • www.orenco.com NTD-PU-PF-1
Rev. 5.0, © 03/17
Page 1 of 5
PF Series 60-Hz, 4-inch (100-mm) Submersible Effluent Pumps
Applications
Our 4-inch (100-mm) Submersible Effluent Pumps are designed to
transport screened effluent (with low TSS counts) from septic tanks or
separate dosing tanks. All our pumps are constructed of lightweight,
corrosion-resistant stainless steel and engineered plastics; all are field-
serviceable and repairable with common tools; 60-Hz PF Series models
are CSA certified to the U.S. and Canadian safety standards for effluent
pumps, meeting UL requirements.
Orenco’s Effluent Pumps are used in a variety of applications, includ-
ing pressurized drainfields, packed bed filters, mounds, aerobic units,
effluent irrigation, effluent sewers, wetlands, lagoons, and more. These
pumps are designed to be used with a Biotube® pump vault or after a
secondary treatment system.
Features/Specifications
To specify this pump for your installation, require the following:
• Minimum 24-hour run-dry capability with no deterioration in pump life
or performance*
• Patented 1⁄8-inch (3-mm) bypass orifice to ensure flow recirculation
for motor cooling and to prevent air bind
• Liquid end repair kits available for better long-term cost of ownership
• TRI-SEAL™ floating impeller design on 10, 15, 20, and 30 gpm
(0.6, 1.0, 1.3, and 1.9 L/sec) models; floating stack design on 50 and
75 gpm (3.2 and 4.7 L/sec) models
• Franklin Electric Super Stainless motor, rated for continuous use and
frequent cycling
• Type SOOW 600-V motor cable
* Not applicable for 5-hp (3.73 kW) models
Standard Models
See specifications chart, pages 2-3, for a list of standard pumps. For
a complete list of available pumps, call Orenco.
Product Code Diagram
PF -
Nominal flow, gpm (L/sec):
10 = 10 (0.6) 15 = 15 (1.0)
20 = 20 (1.3) 30 = 30 (1.9)
50 = 50 (3.2) 75 = 75 (4.7)
Pump, PF Series
Frequency:
1 = single-phase 60 Hz
3 = three-phase 60 Hz
Voltage, nameplate:
1 = 115* 200 = 200
2 = 230 4 = 460
Horsepower (kW):
03 = 1⁄3 hp (0.25) 05 = ½ hp (0.37)
07 = ¾ hp (0.56) 10 = 1 hp (0.75)
15 = 1½ hp (1.11) 20 = 2 hp (1.50)
30 = 3 hp (2.24) 50 = 5 hp (3.73)
Cord length, ft (m):‡
Blank = 10 (3) 20 = 20 (6)
30 = 30 (9) 50 = 50 (15)
Check valve:
Blank = no internal check valve
CV = internal check valve†
* ½-hp (0.37kW) only
† Available for 10 gpm (0.6 L/sec), 1/2 hp (0.37 kW) only
‡ Note: 20-ft cords are available only for single-phase pumps through 1½ hp
Franklin
Super Stainless
Motor
Franklin
Liquid End
Discharge Connection
Bypass Orifice
Suction Connection
LR80980
LR2053896
Powered by
Orenco Systems® Inc. , 814 Airway Ave., Sutherlin, OR 97479 USA • 800-348-9843 • 541-459-4449 • www.orenco.com NTD-PU-PF-1
Rev. 5.0, © 03/17
Page 2 of 5
Technical Data Sheet
Specifications
Pump Model
PF100511 10 (0.6) 0.50 (0.37) 1 115 120 12.7 12.7 6 1 ¼ in. GFP 23.0 (660) 16 (406) 26 (12) 300
PF100511CV 10 (0.6) 0.50 (0.37) 1 115 120 12.7 12.7 6 1 ¼ in. GFP 23.0 (660) 16 (406) 26 (12) 300
PF100512 10 (0.6) 0.50 (0.37) 1 230 240 6.3 6.3 6 1 ¼ in. GFP 23.0 (660) 16 (406) 26 (12) 300
PF10053200 10 (0.6) 0.50 (0.37) 3 200 208 3.8 3.8 6 1 ¼ in. GFP 23.0 (660) 16 (406) 26 (12) 300
PF100712 4, 5 10 (0.6) 0.75 (0.56) 1 230 240 8.3 8.3 8 1 ¼ in. GFP 25.9 (658) 17 (432) 30 (14) 300
PF10073200 4, 5 10 (0.6) 0.75 (0.56) 3 200 208 5.1 5.2 8 1 ¼ in. GFP 25.4 (645) 17 (432) 31 (14) 300
PF101012 5, 6 10 (0.6) 1.00 (0.75) 1 230 240 9.6 9.6 9 1 ¼ in. GFP 27.9 (709) 18 (457) 33 (15) 100
PF10103200 5, 6 10 (0.6) 1.00 (0.75) 3 200 208 5.5 5.5 9 1 ¼ in. GFP 27.3 (693) 18 (457) 37 (17) 300
PF102012 5, 6, 7, 8 10 (0.6) 2.00 (1.49) 1 230 240 12.1 12.1 18 1 ¼ in. SS 39.5 (1003) 22 (559) 48 (22) 100
PF102032 5, 6, 8 10 (0.6) 2.00 (1.49) 3 230 240 7.5 7.6 18 1 ¼ in. SS 37.9 (963) 20 (508) 44 (20) 300
PF10203200 5, 6, 8 10 (0.6) 2.00 (1.49) 3 200 208 8.7 8.7 18 1 ¼ in. SS 37.9 (963) 20 (508) 44 (20) 300
PF150311 15 (1.0) 0.33 (0.25) 1 115 120 8.7 8.8 3 1 ¼ in. GFP 19.5 (495) 15 (380) 23 (10) 300
PF150312 15 (1.0) 0.33 (0.25) 1 230 240 4.4 4.5 3 1 ¼ in. GFP 19.5 (495) 15 (380) 23 (10) 300
PF200511 20 (1.3) 0.50 (0.37) 1 115 120 12.3 12.5 4 1 ¼ in. GFP 22.3 (566) 18 (457) 25 (11) 300
PF200512 20 (1.3) 0.50 (0.37) 1 230 240 6.4 6.5 4 1 ¼ in. GFP 22.5 (572) 18 (457) 26 (12) 300
PF20053200 20 (1.3) 0.50 (0.37) 3 200 208 3.7 3.8 4 1 ¼ in. GFP 22.3 (566) 18 (457) 26 (12) 300
PF201012 4, 5 20 (1.3) 1.00 (0.75) 1 230 240 10.5 10.5 7 1 ¼ in. GFP 28.4 (721) 20 (508) 33 (15) 100
PF20103200 4, 5 20 (1.3) 1.00 (0.75) 3 200 208 5.8 5.9 7 1 ¼ in. GFP 27.8 (706) 20 (508) 33 (15) 300
PF201512 4, 5 20 (1.3) 1.50 (1.11) 1 230 240 12.4 12.6 9 1 ¼ in. GFP 34.0 (864) 24 (610) 41 (19) 100
PF20153200 4, 5 20 (1.3) 1.50 (1.11) 3 200 208 7.1 7.2 9 1 ¼ in. GFP 30.7 (780) 20 (508) 35 (16) 300
PF300511 30 (1.9) 0.50 (0.37) 1 115 120 11.8 11.8 3 1 ¼ in. GFP 21.3 (541) 20 (508) 28 (13) 300
PF300512 30 (1.9) 0.50 (0.37) 1 230 240 6.2 6.2 3 1 ¼ in. GFP 21.3 (541) 20 (508) 25 (11) 300
PF30053200 30 (1.9) 0.50 (0.37) 3 200 208 3.6 3.6 3 1 ¼ in. GFP 21.3 (541) 20 (508) 25 (11) 300
PF300712 30 (1.9) 0.75 (0.56) 1 230 240 8.5 8.5 5 1 ¼ in. GFP 24.8 (630) 21 (533) 29 (13) 300
PF30073200 30 (1.9) 0.75 (0.56) 3 200 208 4.9 4.9 5 1 ¼ in. GFP 24.6 (625) 21 (533) 30 (14) 300
PF301012 4 30 (1.9) 1.00 (0.75) 1 230 240 10.4 10.4 6 1 ¼ in. GFP 27.0 (686) 22 (559) 32 (15) 100
PF30103200 4 30 (1.9) 1.00 (0.75) 3 200 208 5.8 5.8 6 1 ¼ in. GFP 26.4 (671) 22 (559) 33 (15) 300
PF301512 4, 5 30 (1.9) 1.50 (1.11) 1 230 240 12.6 12.6 8 1 ¼ in. GFP 32.8 (833) 24 (610) 40 (18) 100
PF30153200 4, 5 30 (1.9) 1.50 (1.11) 3 200 208 6.9 6.9 8 1 ¼ in. GFP 29.8 (757) 22 (559) 34 (15) 300
PF301534 4, 5 30 (1.9) 1.50 (1.11) 3 460 480 2.8 2.8 8 1 ¼ in. GFP 29.5 (685) 22 (559) 34 (15) 300
PF302012 5, 6, 7 30 (1.9) 2.00 (1.49) 1 230 240 11.0 11.0 10 1 ¼ in. SS 35.5 (902) 26 (660) 44 (20) 100
PF30203200 5, 6 30 (1.9) 2.00 (1.49) 3 200 208 9.3 9.3 10 1 ¼ in. SS 34.0 (864) 24 (610) 41 (19) 300
PF303012 5, 6, 7, 8 30 (1.9) 3.00 (2.23) 1 230 240 16.8 16.8 14 1 ¼ in. SS 44.5 (1130) 33 (838) 54 (24) 100
PF303032 5, 6, 8 30 (1.9) 3.00 (2.23) 3 230 240 10.0 10.1 14 1 ¼ in. SS 44.3 (1125) 27 (686) 52 (24) 300
PF305012 5, 6, 7, 8 30 (1.9) 5.00 (3.73) 1 230 240 25.6 25.8 23 1 ¼ in. SS 66.5 (1689) 53 (1346) 82 (37) 100
PF305032 5, 6, 8 30 (1.9) 5.00 (3.73) 3 230 240 16.6 16.6 23 1 ¼ in. SS 60.8 (1544) 48 (1219) 66 (30) 300
PF30503200 5, 6, 8 30 (1.9) 5.00 (3.73) 3 200 208 18.7 18.7 23 1 ¼ in. SS 60.8 (1544) 48 (1219) 66 (30) 300
PF500511 50 (3.2) 0.50 (0.37) 1 115 120 12.1 12.1 2 2 in. SS 20.3 (516) 24 (610) 27 (12) 300
PF500512 50 (3.2) 0.50 (0.37) 1 230 240 6.2 6.2 2 2 in. SS 20.3 (516) 24 (610) 27 (12) 300
PF500532 50 (3.2) 0.50 (0.37) 3 230 240 3.0 3.0 2 2 in. SS 20.3 (516) 24 (610) 28 (13) 300
PF50053200 50 (3.2) 0.50 (0.37) 3 200 208 3.7 3.7 2 2 in. SS 20.3 (516) 24 (610) 28 (13) 300
PF500534 50 (3.2) 0.50 (0.37) 3 460 480 1.5 1.5 2 2 in. SS 20.3 (516) 24 (610) 28 (13) 300
PF500712 50 (3.2) 0.75 (0.56) 1 230 240 8.5 8.5 3 2 in. SS 23.7 (602) 25 (635) 31 (14) 300
PF500732 50 (3.2) 0.75 (0.56) 3 230 240 3.9 3.9 3 2 in. SS 23.7 (602) 25 (635) 32 (15) 300Design gpm (L/sec)Horsepower (kW)PhaseNameplate voltageActual voltageDesign flow ampsMax ampsImpellersDischarge size and material 1Length, in. (mm)Min. liquid level, 2 in. (mm)Weight, 3 lb (kg)Rated cycles/day
Orenco Systems® Inc. , 814 Airway Ave., Sutherlin, OR 97479 USA • 800-348-9843 • 541-459-4449 • www.orenco.com NTD-PU-PF-1
Rev. 5.0, © 03/17
Page 3 of 5
Technical Data Sheet
Specifications, cont.
Pump Model
PF50073200 50 (3.2) 0.75 (0.56) 3 200 208 4.9 4.9 3 2 in. SS 23.1 (587) 26 (660) 32 (15) 300
PF500734 50 (3.2) 0.75 (0.56) 3 460 480 1.8 1.8 3 2 in. SS 34.8 (884) 25 (635) 31 (14) 300
PF501012 50 (3.2) 1.00 (0.75) 1 230 240 10.1 10.1 4 2 in. SS 27.0 (686) 26 (660) 35 (16) 100
PF50103200 50 (3.2) 1.00 (0.75) 3 200 208 5.7 5.7 4 2 in. SS 26.4 (671) 26 (660) 39 (18) 300
PF501034 50 (3.2) 1.00 (0.75) 3 460 480 2.2 2.2 4 2 in. SS 26.4 (671) 26 (660) 39 (18) 300
PF5015124 50 (3.2) 1.50 (1.11) 1 230 240 12.5 12.6 5 2 in. SS 32.5 (826) 30 (762) 41 (19) 100
PF501532004 50 (3.2) 1.50 (1.11) 3 200 208 7.0 7.0 5 2 in. SS 29.3 (744) 26 (660) 35 (16) 300
PF503012 4, 5, 7, 8 50 (3.2) 3.00 (2.23) 1 230 240 17.7 17.7 8 2 in. SS 43.0 (1092) 37 (940) 55 (25) 100
PF50303200 4, 5, 8 50 (3.2) 3.00 (2.23) 3 200 208 13.1 13.1 8 2 in. SS 43.4 (1102) 30 (762) 55 (25) 300
PF503034 4, 5, 8 50 (3.2) 3.00 (2.23) 3 460 480 5.3 5.3 8 2 in. SS 40.0 (1016) 31 (787) 55 (25) 300
PF505012 5,6,7,8 50 (3.2) 5.00 (3.73) 1 230 240 26.2 26.4 13 2 in. SS 65.4 (1661) 55 (1397) 64 (29) 300
PF505032 5,6,7,8 50 (3.2) 5.00 (3.73) 3 230 240 16.5 16.5 13 2 in. SS 59.3 (1506) 49 (1245) 64 (29) 300
PF751012 75 (4.7) 1.00 (0.75) 1 230 240 9.9 10.0 3 2 in. SS 27.0 (686) 27 (686) 34 (15) 100
PF751512 75 (4.7) 1.50 (1.11) 1 230 240 12.1 12.3 4 2 in. SS 33.4 (848) 30 (762) 44 (20) 100
1 GFP = glass-filled polypropylene; SS = stainless steel. The 1 ¼-in. NPT GFP discharge is 2 7⁄8 in. octagonal across flats; the 1 ¼-in. NPT SS discharge is 2 1⁄8 in. octagonal across flats; and the 2-in.
NPT SS discharge is 2 7⁄8 in. hexagonal across flats. Discharge is female NPT threaded, U.S. nominal size, to accommodate Orenco® discharge hose and valve assemblies. Consult your Orenco Distributor
about fittings to connect hose and valve assemblies to metric-sized piping.
2 Minimum liquid level is for single pumps when installed in an Orenco Biotube® Pump Vault or Universal Flow Inducer. In other applications, minimum liquid level should be top of pump. Consult Orenco for
more information.
3 Weight includes carton and 10-ft (3-m) cord.
4 High-pressure discharge assembly required.
5 Do not use cam-lock option (Q) on discharge assembly.
6 Custom discharge assembly required for these pumps. Contact Orenco.
7 Capacitor pack (sold separately or installed in a custom control panel) required for this pump. Contact Orenco.
8 Torque locks are available for all pumps, and are supplied with 3-hp and 5-hp pumps.
Materials of Construction
Discharge Glass-filled polypropylene or stainless steel
Discharge bearing Engineered thermoplastic (PEEK)
Diffusers Glass-filled PPO (Noryl GFN3)
Impellers Celcon® acetal copolymer on 10-, 20, and 30-gpm models; 50-gpm impellers are Noryl GFN3
Intake screen Polypropylene
Suction connection Stainless steel
Drive shaft 7/16 inch hexagonal stainless steel, 300 series
Coupling Sintered stainless steel, 300 series
Shell Stainless steel, 300 series
Motor Franklin motor exterior constructed of stainless steel. Motor filled with deionized water and propylene glycol for constant lubrication. Hermetically
sealed motor housing ensures moisture-free windings. All thrust absorbed by Kingsbury-type thrust bearing. Rated for continuous duty. Single-
phase motors and 200 and 230 V 3-phase motors equipped with surge arrestors for added security. Single-phase motors through 1.5 hp
(1.11 kW) have built-in thermal overload protection, which trips at 203-221˚ F (95-105˚ C). Design gpm (L/sec)Horsepower (kW)PhaseNameplate voltageActual voltageDesign flow ampsMax ampsImpellersDischarge size and material 1Length, in. (mm)Min. liquid level, 2 in. (mm)Weight, 3 lb (kg)Rated cycles/day
Orenco Systems® Inc. , 814 Airway Ave., Sutherlin, OR 97479 USA • 800-348-9843 • 541-459-4449 • www.orenco.com NTD-PU-PF-1
Rev. 5.0, © 03/17
Page 4 of 5
Technical Data Sheet
Using a Pump Curve
A pump curve helps you determine the best pump for your system. Pump curves show the relationship between flow and pressure (total dynamic
head, or TDH), providing a graphical representation of a pump’s optimal performance range. Pumps perform best at their nominal flow rate. These
graphs show optimal pump operation ranges with a solid line and show flow rates outside of these ranges with a dashed line. For the most accurate
pump specification, use Orenco’s PumpSelect™ software.
Pump Curves
Total dynamic head (TDH) in feetFlow in gallons per minute (gpm)
24 81012141660
800
700
600
500
400
300
200
100 PF1005-FC
w/ ¼" flow
controller
PF10 Series, 60 Hz, 0.5 - 2.0 hp
PF1007
PF1010
PF1020
PF1005
Total dynamic head (TDH) in feetFlow in gallons per minute (gpm)
36 12 15 18 21 2490
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
PF1503
PF15 Series, 60 Hz, 0.3 hp
Total dynamic head (TDH) in feetFlow in gallons per minute (gpm)
5102025303540150
400
350
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
PF2005
PF2010
PF2015
PF20 Series, 60 Hz, 0.5 - 1.5 hp
Total dynamic head (TDH) in feetFlow in gallons per minute (gpm)
510202530354045150
800
900
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
PF3005
PF3007
PF3010
PF3015
PF3020
PF3030
PF3050 PF30 Series, 60 Hz, 0.5 - 5.0 hp
Orenco Systems® Inc. , 814 Airway Ave., Sutherlin, OR 97479 USA • 800-348-9843 • 541-459-4449 • www.orenco.com NTD-PU-PF-1
Rev. 5.0, © 03/17
Page 5 of 5
Technical Data Sheet
Total dynamic head (TDH) in feetFlow in gallons per minute (gpm)
450
400
350
300
250
200
150
100
50
0 10 02040506070809030
PF5050
PF5030
PF5015
PF5010
PF5007
PF5005
PF50 Series, 60 Hz, 0.5 - 5.0 hp
Total dynamic head (TDH) in feetFlow in gallons per minute (gpm)
10 20 40 50 60 70 80 90 100300
80
90
100
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
PF75 Series, 60 Hz, 1.0 - 1.5 hpPF7515
PF7510
Pump Curves, cont.
Orenco® | General Onsite Wastewater Products Catalog
PAGE 70 FOR A DISTRIBUTOR NEAR YOU, VISIT US ONLINE AT WWW.ORENCO.COM ACT-PRD-GOP-1, REV. 2.0
Orifi ce Shields
Orenco® Orifi ce Shields are used in a pressurized distribution system to
protect the orifi ces from backfi ll debris that might cause orifi ce blockage.
• Snap-fi t on top of or beneath a lateral, depending on the location of
the orifi ce
• Installs on top of lateral or underneath lateral
• Orifi ce Shields available to fi t ¾-inch, 1-inch, 1¼-inch, 1½-inch, and
2-inch NPS sizes
Product Codes
• OS075 — fi ts ¾-inch NPS (20-mm DN) lateral pipe
• OS100 — fi ts 1-inch NPS (25-mm DN) lateral pipe
• OS125 — fi ts 1¼-inch NPS (32-mm DN) lateral pipe
• OS150 — fi ts 1½-inch NPS (40-mm DN) lateral pipe
• OS200 — fi ts 2-inch NPS (50-mm DN) lateral pipe
* For the full range of available product options, contact your local Orenco
Distributor or Orenco.
Orenco Orifice Shields
Miscellaneous Onsite Wastewater Products
Appendix H: Drawings
C17OWTS SYSTEMCHECKED BY:#DESCRIPTION DATE DRAWN BYCONSTRUCTION DRAWN BY:JOB #:2021-24NOT FORTRSRBGROARING FORK ENGINEERING
592 HIGHWAY 133
CARBONDALE COLORADO, 81623
PH: (970)340-4130 F:(866)876-5873
COFFMAN'S CORNER
3006 FRYING PAN RD.
EAGLE COUNTY , COLORADO
1 PERMIT SET 7/2/2021 TRS
EAGLE COUNTY COMMENT RESPONSE SET 11/04/2021 TRS2
C18OWTS - STA LAYOUTCHECKED BY:#DESCRIPTION DATE DRAWN BYCONSTRUCTION DRAWN BY:JOB #:2021-24NOT FORTRSRBGROARING FORK ENGINEERING
592 HIGHWAY 133
CARBONDALE COLORADO, 81623
PH: (970)340-4130 F:(866)876-5873
COFFMAN'S CORNER
3006 FRYING PAN RD.
EAGLE COUNTY , COLORADO
1 PERMIT SET 7/2/2021 TRS
EAGLE COUNTY COMMENT RESPONSE SET 11/04/2021 TRS2
Kbi
x··········C19OWTS DETAILSCHECKED BY:#DESCRIPTION DATE DRAWN BYCONSTRUCTION DRAWN BY:JOB #:2021-24NOT FORTRSRBGROARING FORK ENGINEERING
592 HIGHWAY 133
CARBONDALE COLORADO, 81623
PH: (970)340-4130 F:(866)876-5873
COFFMAN'S CORNER
3006 FRYING PAN RD.
EAGLE COUNTY , COLORADO
1 PERMIT SET 7/2/2021 TRS
EAGLE COUNTY COMMENT RESPONSE SET 11/10/2021 TRS2
100% CDs 11/19/2021 TRS3
11/30/23, 10:05 AM Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd: septic tank riser pipe.
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=08c22beb03&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f:1783917663262687777&simpl=msg-f:17839176632626877…1/2
Danielle Salinsky <danielle.salinsky@eaglecounty.us>
Fwd: septic tank riser pipe.
1 message
Claire Lewandowski <claire.lewandowski@eaglecounty.us>Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 9:47 AM
To: Danielle Salinsky <danielle.salinsky@eaglecounty.us>
Here is an additional photo for 3006 frying pan rd. Thanks again!
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Marco Gomez <mgomez@harrimanconstruction.com>
Date: Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 3:53 PM
Subject: septic tank riser pipe.
To: Claire Lewandowski <claire.lewandowski@eaglecounty.us>
Cc: Loren Haselden <lhaselden@harrimanconstruction.com>, Boone Caudill <bcaudill@harrimanconstruction.com>, Dan
Benson <dbenson@harrimanconstruction.com>
Good afternoon Claire,
Please the septic riser pipe extended to the top for easy access/ maintenance as you requested.
This concludes all my pictures to you. Would you please advise if you the inspection is now approved?
Please let me know than you.
Marco gomez
Harriman construction
280 E Cody Lane
Basalt, CO
970-927-1161
C. 970-379-4888
From: Marco Gomez <mgomez@harrimanconstruction.com>
Sent: Monday, November 27, 2023 3:43 PM
To: Marco Gomez <mgomez@harrimanconstruction.com>
Subject:
11/30/23, 10:05 AM Eagle County Government Mail - Fwd: septic tank riser pipe.
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=08c22beb03&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f:1783917663262687777&simpl=msg-f:17839176632626877…2/2
Sent from my iPhone
--
Claire Lewandowski, REHS
Environmental Health Manager
Eagle County Public & Environmental Health
she | her | hers
970-328-8755 (office)
970-328-8747 (direct)
environment@eaglecounty.us
www.eaglecounty.us
“To succeed, planning alone is insufficient. One must improvise as well.” ― Isaac Asimov
9/10/21, 4:15 PM Eagle County Government Mail - 3006 Frying Pan Rd OWTS Application and Design Corrections
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=da50768ddd&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-a%3Ar-3586028163543622290&simpl=msg-a%3Ar-5276075…1/7
Claire Lewandowski <claire.lewandowski@eaglecounty.us>
3006 Frying Pan Rd OWTS Application and Design Corrections
13 messages
Claire Lewandowski <claire.lewandowski@eaglecounty.us>Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 2:38 PM
To: Tyler Stevens <tylers@rfeng.biz>, Richard Goulding <richardg@rfeng.biz>
Cc: Maura Trumble <mtrumble@ccyarchitects.com>, Matthew Qual <mqual@ccyarchitects.com>, Danielle Sell
<danielle.sell@eaglecounty.us>
Good afternoon,
I finished reviewing the design for this OWTS and I have some comments for you to address:
1. The design copy I received was very blurry, including photos, but the design drawings were incomplete, the site
plan does not show the whole system (just tank), nor were there any cross views for the design, just the ADV. I
think they may have been cut-off while scanning. I prefer electronic copies of the design and design site plans for
these reasons, and since they are mainly prepared in cad programs they are easier to view.
2. The soils tests mention no ground water but there was no comment on evidence of seasonally high ground
water (mottling or redoximorphic features) . Would you comment on the presence or absence of evidence of
seasonally high groundwater?
3. The plans specify that the soil is type R-1, option 2, using 2 feet of sand, but there were no details on the soil
treatment area(STA) designed including trenches, bed, sand cross views, sand specifications. Please include this
including the entire layout and design of the STA.
4. The plan is designed for 600 gpd, and a two-comp tank with 1500 gallons capacity in total. 43.9.I.3.b. states, "The
second compartment of a two-compartment septic tank may only be used as the pump tank when the tank is
specifically designed for this purpose and it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the ECPHA that the
minimum 48-hour detention time will not be decreased." I have interpreted this to mean that if you want to use the
second compartment as a pump chamber there must be 72 hours of retention in the two compartments, so the
pump can send 24 hours of effluent (600 gallons) out without disturbing 48 hours of effluent (1200 gallons). So
1500 gallons would only leave 900 gallons undisturbed. The options are to get a larger two compartment tank
(1800 gallons which would be a 2000 gallon 2-comp tank) or add a pump chamber after the tank, or a three-
compartment tank with a min of 1500 gallon in the first two compartments. I have discussed this with CDPHEs
decentralized systems rep and received agreement with my interpretation.
5. Last, I did not see any mention of filtering the effluent, are you proposing a biotube vault or other type? Please
include that information.
Thank you,
Claire
--
Claire Lewandowski, REHS
Environmental Health Specialist III
970-328-8755 (office)
970-328-8747 (direct)
environment@eaglecounty.us
www.eaglecounty.us
Tyler Stevens <tylers@rfeng.biz>Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 3:28 PM
To: Claire Lewandowski <claire.lewandowski@eaglecounty.us>
Cc: Maura Trumble <mtrumble@ccyarchitects.com>, Matthew Qual <mqual@ccyarchitects.com>, Danielle Sell
<danielle.sell@eaglecounty.us>
9/10/21, 4:15 PM Eagle County Government Mail - 3006 Frying Pan Rd OWTS Application and Design Corrections
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=da50768ddd&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-a%3Ar-3586028163543622290&simpl=msg-a%3Ar-5276075…2/7
Hey Claire,
It seems a bit of information wasn’t up to date or there may have been some sheets that didn’t make it to you. My
apologies.
I will get proper responses, updated reports/drawings and corrections to you ASAP but in the mean time here are some
quick responses and the entire set.
My responses are in Red below.
Thanks,
Tyler
TYLER STEVENS, PE
Project Engineer
Office: 970.340.4130 ext. 706
Mobile: 970.379.2687
https://www.rfeng.biz/
From: Claire Lewandowski <claire.lewandowski@eaglecounty.us>
Sent: Friday, August 20, 2021 2:38 PM
To: Tyler Stevens <tylers@rfeng.biz>; Richard Goulding <richardg@rfeng.biz>
Cc: Maura Trumble <mtrumble@ccyarchitects.com>; Matthew Qual <mqual@ccyarchitects.com>; Danielle Sell
<danielle.sell@eaglecounty.us>
Subject: 3006 Frying Pan Rd OWTS Application and Design Corrections
Good afternoon,
I finished reviewing the design for this OWTS and I have some comments for you to address:
1. The design copy I received was very blurry, including photos, but the design drawings were incomplete, the site
plan does not show the whole system (just tank), nor were there any cross views for the design, just the ADV. I
think they may have been cut-off while scanning. I prefer electronic copies of the design and design site plans for
these reasons, and since they are mainly prepared in cad programs they are easier to view.
The full set should be attached now.
2. The soils tests mention no ground water but there was no comment on evidence of seasonally high ground
water (mottling or redoximorphic features) . Would you comment on the presence or absence of evidence of
seasonally high groundwater?
There wasn’t any signs of high ground water or color change in the soil profile. I believe they have been monitoring
ground water all summer so I might be able to get some logs.
9/10/21, 4:15 PM Eagle County Government Mail - 3006 Frying Pan Rd OWTS Application and Design Corrections
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=da50768ddd&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-a%3Ar-3586028163543622290&simpl=msg-a%3Ar-5276075…3/7
3. The plans specify that the soil is type R-1, option 2, using 2 feet of sand, but there were no details on the soil
treatment area(STA) designed including trenches, bed, sand cross views, sand specifications. Please include this
including the entire layout and design of the STA.
The detail sheet C18 has a detail showing the sand and a gradation spec. to go with it.
4. The plan is designed for 600 gpd, and a two-comp tank with 1500 gallons capacity in total. 43.9.I.3.b. states, "The
second compartment of a two-compartment septic tank may only be used as the pump tank when the tank is
specifically designed for this purpose and it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the ECPHA that the
minimum 48-hour detention time will not be decreased." I have interpreted this to mean that if you want to use the
second compartment as a pump chamber there must be 72 hours of retention in the two compartments, so the
pump can send 24 hours of effluent (600 gallons) out without disturbing 48 hours of effluent (1200 gallons). So
1500 gallons would only leave 900 gallons undisturbed. The options are to get a larger two compartment tank
(1800 gallons which would be a 2000 gallon 2-comp tank) or add a pump chamber after the tank, or a three-
compartment tank with a min of 1500 gallon in the first two compartments. I have discussed this with CDPHEs
decentralized systems rep and received agreement with my interpretation.
I will dive into this piece of code but we can upsize the tank if needed. We usually get everything from valley precast who
supplies the tank and the pumping Orenco package. They design/builds the tanks for most the systems I’ve done. There
is a detail from valley precast on sheet C18 as well. It seems this should satisfy the “specifically designed” criteria.
5. Last, I did not see any mention of filtering the effluent, are you proposing a biotube vault or other type? Please
include that information.
I will specify that the bio-tube filter be used clearly in the drawing and report. It should come with the prepacked Orenco
pump pack that valey precast installs at least that what I’ve seen before.
[Quoted text hidden]
3006 Frying Pan Rd.- Civil Permit Set.pdf
23149K
Claire Lewandowski <claire.lewandowski@eaglecounty.us>Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 3:31 PM
To: Tyler Stevens <tylers@rfeng.biz>
Cc: Maura Trumble <mtrumble@ccyarchitects.com>, Matthew Qual <mqual@ccyarchitects.com>, Danielle Sell
<danielle.sell@eaglecounty.us>
Great, thank you. Attached is what I received initially for your information.
[Quoted text hidden]
Application and Design.pdf
3029K
Tyler Stevens <tylers@rfeng.biz>Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 3:33 PM
To: Claire Lewandowski <claire.lewandowski@eaglecounty.us>
Cc: Maura Trumble <mtrumble@ccyarchitects.com>, Matthew Qual <mqual@ccyarchitects.com>, Danielle Sell
<danielle.sell@eaglecounty.us>
Ohhh I see what happened… they were sized to 24”x36” and I guess maybe they got replotted to just 8.5” x 11” cutting
them off.
[Quoted text hidden]
Tyler Stevens <tylers@rfeng.biz>Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 3:34 PM
To: Claire Lewandowski <claire.lewandowski@eaglecounty.us>
Cc: Maura Trumble <mtrumble@ccyarchitects.com>, Matthew Qual <mqual@ccyarchitects.com>, Danielle Sell
<danielle.sell@eaglecounty.us>
Here the original report.
9/10/21, 4:15 PM Eagle County Government Mail - 3006 Frying Pan Rd OWTS Application and Design Corrections
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=da50768ddd&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-a%3Ar-3586028163543622290&simpl=msg-a%3Ar-5276075…4/7
Sorry about that.
[Quoted text hidden]
3006 Frying Pan Rd. - OWTS Report (FULL 7-7-2021).pdf
10538K
Matthew Qual <mqual@ccyarchitects.com>Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 3:35 PM
To: Tyler Stevens <tylers@rfeng.biz>, Claire Lewandowski <claire.lewandowski@eaglecounty.us>
Cc: Maura Trumble <mtrumble@ccyarchitects.com>, Danielle Sell <danielle.sell@eaglecounty.us>
Apologies all, that’s exactly what happened. I didn’t realize there were 24x36’s in the mix. Hopefully everything is cleared
up with the previous attachment.
Thanks,
Matt
MATT QUAL | Architect
C C Y A R C H I T E C T S
970 927 4925 Office
ccyarchitects.com
RECENT RECOGNITIONS
[Quoted text hidden]
This email has been scanned for spam and viruses by Proofpoint Essentials. Click here to report this email as spam.
Claire Lewandowski <claire.lewandowski@eaglecounty.us>Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 3:36 PM
To: Tyler Stevens <tylers@rfeng.biz>
Cc: Maura Trumble <mtrumble@ccyarchitects.com>, Matthew Qual <mqual@ccyarchitects.com>, Danielle Sell
<danielle.sell@eaglecounty.us>
Thank you! Let me know about the tank size and your interpretation of that regulation.
[Quoted text hidden]
Tyler Stevens <tylers@rfeng.biz>Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 3:58 PM
To: Claire Lewandowski <claire.lewandowski@eaglecounty.us>
Cc: Maura Trumble <mtrumble@ccyarchitects.com>, Matthew Qual <mqual@ccyarchitects.com>, Danielle Sell
<danielle.sell@eaglecounty.us>
I usually focus on Table 9-1 in section 43.9-B-2a for tank sizing and then choose a tank that has been specifically
designed for that volume.
I also pay attention to Section 43.9-B-4a. It says
9/10/21, 4:15 PM Eagle County Government Mail - 3006 Frying Pan Rd OWTS Application and Design Corrections
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=da50768ddd&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-a%3Ar-3586028163543622290&simpl=msg-a%3Ar-5276075…5/7
I’ve always thought that the pump residing in the second chamber didn’t change the effective volume of the entire tank.
So the volume of the second chamber counts towards the residence time.
I guess I’ve never worried about section 43.9.I.3.b. because the tanks usually are specifically designed to house the
pump in the second chamber.
Here is a link to where I get my tank designs as they are almost always the supplier in our neck of the woods.
https://valleyprecast.com/septic-tanks/
[Quoted text hidden]
Claire Lewandowski <claire.lewandowski@eaglecounty.us>Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 4:19 PM
To: Tyler Stevens <tylers@rfeng.biz>
Cc: Maura Trumble <mtrumble@ccyarchitects.com>, Matthew Qual <mqual@ccyarchitects.com>, Danielle Sell
<danielle.sell@eaglecounty.us>
Hi Tyler,
Here's what Chuck Cusino has previously stated for this specific situation,
"Nong the text within 43.9.I.3.b of Reg. 43, which states in part:
“The second compartment of a two-compartment sepc tank may only be used as the pump tank when the
tank is specifically designed for this purpose and it can be demonstrated to the sasfacon of the local public
health agency that the minimum 48-hour detenon me will not be decreased. The pump must be screened
or provided with an approved filtering device to assure that only liquid effluent will be discharged…”
From this, “technically ” what Claire has determined would be correct,
450 gpd x 2 = 900 gal. retenon for 48 hours; 1250 – 450 = 800 gal. retenon; Thus a 100 gallon shortage.
With that said, the regulaon does allow for some latude on this as it states, ”… to the sasfacon of the LPHA…” I
have heard that some agencies will use an esmated average daily flow for this determinaon; say 50
gal./person/day. Thus the 800 gallon retenon would be acceptable. The thought here is that for the vast majority of
the days the 48 hour retenon me will be addressed, while only on the rare peak day would this requirement be
exceeded. An extension of this thought is the theory that if the pump is set to dose say >100 gal., depending on the
ming and where the floats are at the end of the day, that final dose may not engage, thus the system would not
exceed the 48 hr. detenon me.
So to e all of this together; requiring the retenon for the peak flow is perfectly acceptable and provides the most
conservave applicaon of the regulaon, which is usually typical. However, there is some flexibility in the
interpretaon of the regulaon in this case, which allows for some variability."
The only other engineer that I know who uses pumps in the second compartment is now upsizing and did not
demonstrate that the me would not be decreased, so I do not have an example of what that would look like, but if
you want to put together something as suggested above I would consider it.
Thank you,
Claire
[Quoted text hidden]
9/10/21, 4:15 PM Eagle County Government Mail - 3006 Frying Pan Rd OWTS Application and Design Corrections
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=da50768ddd&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-a%3Ar-3586028163543622290&simpl=msg-a%3Ar-5276075…6/7
Tyler Stevens <tylers@rfeng.biz>Sat, Aug 21, 2021 at 4:20 PM
To: Claire Lewandowski <claire.lewandowski@eaglecounty.us>
Cc: Maura Trumble <mtrumble@ccyarchitects.com>, Matthew Qual <mqual@ccyarchitects.com>, Danielle Sell
<danielle.sell@eaglecounty.us>
Hey Claire,
Our daily flow is 600 gpd based on 8 people.
600 x 2 =1200 and we are currently specifying a 1500 gallon tank.
The first chamber of the tank is 1002 gallon and the second chamber is 507 gallons.
I guess there are two choices.
1. If you deem that the second chamber can’t count toward the retention time, then I guess we are 200 gallons short
and will need to use the next tank size up, which is 2000 gallons. This tank still has the pump in the second
chamber but the inlet chamber is 1559 gallons satisfying our retention time.
2. If you decide that the pump residing in the second chamber of the 1500 gallon tank doesn’t decrease the effective
volume by 300 gallons then we can keep the 1500 gallon tank.
I have attached cut sheets for both the 1500 gallon and the 2000 gallon tanks.
Happy to use either tank just want ensure we meet your interpretation.
[Quoted text hidden]
2 attachments
G - 3-1500T-2CP-HHa.pdf
447K
3-2000T-2CP-HHa.pdf
451K
Claire Lewandowski <claire.lewandowski@eaglecounty.us>Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 1:55 PM
To: Tyler Stevens <tylers@rfeng.biz>
Cc: Maura Trumble <mtrumble@ccyarchitects.com>, Matthew Qual <mqual@ccyarchitects.com>, Danielle Sell
<danielle.sell@eaglecounty.us>
Hi Tyler,
Based on those options, I still determine option 1 is correct, for a 2,000 gallon two compartment concrete tank.
Thank you
[Quoted text hidden]
Tyler Stevens <tylers@rfeng.biz>Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 8:56 AM
To: Claire Lewandowski <claire.lewandowski@eaglecounty.us>
Cc: Maura Trumble <mtrumble@ccyarchitects.com>, Matthew Qual <mqual@ccyarchitects.com>, Danielle Sell
<danielle.sell@eaglecounty.us>
Hey Clair,
9/10/21, 4:15 PM Eagle County Government Mail - 3006 Frying Pan Rd OWTS Application and Design Corrections
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=da50768ddd&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-a%3Ar-3586028163543622290&simpl=msg-a%3Ar-5276075…7/7
This sounds good. I have another question about the filter.
Usually the pump basin parts come as a package from the supplier, something similar to the Biotube ProPak (attached).
This has a Biotube filter cartage.
Is this sufficient for the effluent filter or would you like something like Orenco’s 4” Effluent Filter? (Also attached)
If we use the 4” effluent filter we will need an additional chamber as these clog really easily in the first chamber.
I have attached a cut sheet for the 3-chamber tank with the effluent filter.
[Quoted text hidden]
3 attachments
Biotube ProPak Pump Package NTD-BPP-1v30.pdf
458K
Effluent Filter - NTD-FT-FTS-1.pdf
225K
10-1500T-3CP-F-HHa.pdf
488K
Claire Lewandowski <claire.lewandowski@eaglecounty.us>Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 9:02 AM
To: Tyler Stevens <tylers@rfeng.biz>
Cc: Maura Trumble <mtrumble@ccyarchitects.com>, Matthew Qual <mqual@ccyarchitects.com>, Danielle Sell
<danielle.sell@eaglecounty.us>
Hi Tyler,
Yes, the biotube propak package is a good product for filtering effluent before the pump and counts towards filtering
before the field. And yes, if you don't use that you would need the three comp tank and put the effluent filter between the
second and third compartment.
[Quoted text hidden]
SITE LOCATION3006 FRYING PAN ROAD5.00 ACRES ±ZONING: RESOURCEC1COVERCOFFMAN'S CORNER3006 FRYING PAN RD.EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADOCHECKED BY:#DESCRIPTION DATE DRAWN BYCONSTRUCTION DRAWN BY:JOB #:2021-24NOT FORTRSRBGROARING FORK ENGINEERING
592 HIGHWAY 133
CARBONDALE COLORADO, 81623
PH: (970)340-4130 F:(866)876-5873
COFFMAN'S CORNER
3006 FRYING PAN RD.
EAGLE COUNTY , COLORADO
1 PERMIT SET 7/2/2021 TRS
C2GENERALCHECKED BY:#DESCRIPTION DATE DRAWN BYCONSTRUCTION DRAWN BY:JOB #:2021-24NOT FORTRSRBGROARING FORK ENGINEERING
592 HIGHWAY 133
CARBONDALE COLORADO, 81623
PH: (970)340-4130 F:(866)876-5873
COFFMAN'S CORNER
3006 FRYING PAN RD.
EAGLE COUNTY , COLORADO
1 PERMIT SET 7/2/2021 TRS
S 16°
5
8
'
4
6
"
W
1
2
2
.
4
8
'PUMPHOUSEFND #6 REBAR AND3 1/2"ALUMINUM CAPL.S. #31161 BEARSSTAMPED C-W-NW 1/641' ABOVE GROUNDBLOCKCISTERNS 89°51'18" E 85.95'FND #5 REBAR ANDORANGE PLASTIC CAPL.S. #37972 BEARSN42°58'02"W 0.23' .015'ABOVE GROUNDS 54°26'45" E 123.20'C1FND #5 REBAR ANDORANGE PLASTIC CAPL.S. #37972 BEARSS50°03'57"W 0.26' 0.15'ABOVE GROUNDFND #5 REBAR ANDORANGE PLASTIC CAPL.S. #37972 BEARSN72°14'21"W 0.30'0.15' ABOVE GROUNDTBM EL=6852.58'C2FND #5 REBAR ANDORANGE PLASTICCAP L.S. #ILLEGIBLE050' ABOVE GROUNDC3FND #5 REBAR ANDORANGE PLASTIC CAPL.S. #37972 BEARSS68°36'31"W 0.56'DISTURBEDS 00°06'53" W 90.55'S 58°38'36" E 131.23'FND #5 REBAR ANDORANGE PLASTIC CAPL.S. #37972 0.15' ABOVEGROUNDFND #5 REBAR ANDORANGE PLASTICCAP L.S. #37972 0.10'ABOVE GROUNDFND #5 REBAR ANDORANGE PLASTICCAP L.S. #37972 FLUSHWITH GROUNDS 21
°
2
6
'
4
4
"
W
6
5
.
3
1
'FND #5 REBAR ANDORANGE PLASTICCAP L.S. #37972 .010'BELOW GROUNDS
3
9
°
2
6
'
0
8
"
W
5
9
.
2
7
'FND #5 REBAR ANDORANGE PLASTICCAP L.S. #37972 FLUSHWITH GROUNDS 61°56
'59"
W
82
.48
'FND #5 REBAR& PLASTIC CAP L.S.#37972 FLUSHWITHGROUNDL1N 88°48'50" W 140.11'FND #5 REBAR ANDORANGE PLASTICCAP L.S. #37972 FLUSHWITH GROUND3006 FRYING PAN ROAD5.00 ACRES ±ZONING: RESOURCEBOUNDARYCORNER IN TREEN 48°20'54" W 128.51'L2 L3FND #5 REBAR& PLASTIC CAPL.S. #37972 BEARSS50°48'53"W 0.20' FLUSHWITH GROUNDN 89°53'01" W 297.21'N 00°08'20" E 330.96' POWERPOLE ANDANCHORELECTRICMETERDIRT ROADDIRT ROADDIRT ROADFIREPITWWATER WELLAND CONTROLSBQBBQGRILLTELEPHONEPEDESTALICVICV IRRIGATIONCONTROLVALVES X 2BASALT STATE WILDLIFE AREACOLORADO PARKS AND WILDLIFEBASALT STATEWILDLIFE AREACOLORADO PARKSAND WILDLIFEFRYINGPAN RIVERoeoeoeoeoeoeoeoeoeoe POWERPOLE ANDANCHOROVERHEADELECTRICIC
V
I
C
V
IRRIGATIONCONTROLVALVES X 2FND BUILDINGENVELOPE LATH FROMPREVIOUS SURVEY(TYP.)FRYING PAN ROADASPHALT6836.4 BASEFLOOD ELEVATION
FRYINGPAN RIVER6838 BASEFLOOD ELEVATIONFRYINGPAN RIVERFRYINGPAN
R
IVER HIGH WATER LINEAS SURVEYED ON12/01/20206
8
4
0
B
A
S
E
F
L
O
O
D
E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
6842
B
A
S
E
FLO
O
D
E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
6844 BASEFLOOD ELEVATION6846 BASEFLOOD ELEVATIONN
3
6
°
1
3
'
2
4
"
E
(B
A
S
I
S
O
F
B
E
A
R
I
N
G
)FND #5 REBAR& PLASTIC CAPL.S. #37972 BEARSS23°14'17"E 0.20' FLUSHWITH GROUNDISLAND AREA12.5' BUILDINGSETBACK PEREAGLE COUNTYP& Z DEPT.APPROXIMATEBUILDING ENVELOPEBASED ON PREVIOUSSURVEY AND FOUNDLATH MARKERSFRYINGPAN RIVEREDGE OF ASPHALTXBUILDING ENVELOPEBASED ON APPROX.HIGH WATER MARKLOCATION7
5
'DILAPIDATEDFENCEAPPROXIMATEBUILDING ENVELOPEBASED ON PREVIOUSSURVEY AND FOUNDLATH MARKERSFLOODPLAIN ZONE AEPER FEMA PANEL08037C0951DDATED EFFECTIVE12/04/2007FLOODPLAIN ZONE AEPER FEMA PANEL08037C0951DDATED EFFECTIVE12/04/2007FLOODPLAIN ZONE XPER FEMA PANEL08037C0951DDATED EFFECTIVE12/04/2007FND #5 REBAR& PLASTIC CAPL.S. #37972 BEARSS20°41'55"W 0.67' 0.20'ABOVE GROUND50'BASALT STATEWILDLIFE AREACOLORADO PARKSAND WILDLIFEBASALT STATEWILDLIFE AREACOLORADO PARKSAND WILDLIFE33' ROADWAY &PUBLIC UTILITY R-O-WPER BK 145 PG 28433'
N 00°06'53" E 66.65'#6 REBAR AND3 1/2"ALUMINUM CAPL.S. #31161 BEARSSTAMPED S10 NW 1/16SET #5 REBAR& ORANGE PLASTIC CAPL.S. #37935 283' WITNESSCORNERP.O.B.8 OAK TREESGROUP 1DRIP LINE(TYP.)13 OAK TREESGROUP 2DRIP LINE(TYP.)7 OAK TREESGROUP 3DRIP LINE(TYP.)6 OAK TREESGROUP 4DRIP LINE(TYP.)11 OAK TREESGROUP 5DRIP LINE(TYP.)5 OAK TREESGROUP 6DRIP LINE(TYP.)2 OAK TREESGROUP 8DRIP LINE(TYP.)5 OAK TREESGROUP 7DRIP LINE(TYP.)EC3EXISTING CONDITIONSCHECKED BY:#DESCRIPTION DATE DRAWN BYCONSTRUCTION DRAWN BY:JOB #:2021-24NOT FORTRSRBGROARING FORK ENGINEERING
592 HIGHWAY 133
CARBONDALE COLORADO, 81623
PH: (970)340-4130 F:(866)876-5873
COFFMAN'S CORNER
3006 FRYING PAN RD.
EAGLE COUNTY , COLORADO
1 PERMIT SET 7/2/2021 TRS
XEC4EROSION CONTROLCHECKED BY:#DESCRIPTION DATE DRAWN BYCONSTRUCTION DRAWN BY:JOB #:2021-24NOT FORTRSRBGROARING FORK ENGINEERING
592 HIGHWAY 133
CARBONDALE COLORADO, 81623
PH: (970)340-4130 F:(866)876-5873
COFFMAN'S CORNER
3006 FRYING PAN RD.
EAGLE COUNTY , COLORADO
1 PERMIT SET 7/2/2021 TRS
C5EROSION CONTROLDETAILSCHECKED BY:#DESCRIPTION DATE DRAWN BYCONSTRUCTION DRAWN BY:JOB #:2021-24NOT FORTRSRBGROARING FORK ENGINEERING
592 HIGHWAY 133
CARBONDALE COLORADO, 81623
PH: (970)340-4130 F:(866)876-5873
COFFMAN'S CORNER
3006 FRYING PAN RD.
EAGLE COUNTY , COLORADO
1 PERMIT SET 7/2/2021 TRS
C6SITE DETAILSCHECKED BY:#DESCRIPTION DATE DRAWN BYCONSTRUCTION DRAWN BY:JOB #:2021-24NOT FORTRSRBGROARING FORK ENGINEERING
592 HIGHWAY 133
CARBONDALE COLORADO, 81623
PH: (970)340-4130 F:(866)876-5873
COFFMAN'S CORNER
3006 FRYING PAN RD.
EAGLE COUNTY , COLORADO
1 PERMIT SET 7/2/2021 TRS
XEC7SITE PLANCHECKED BY:#DESCRIPTION DATE DRAWN BYCONSTRUCTION DRAWN BY:JOB #:2021-24NOT FORTRSRBGROARING FORK ENGINEERING
592 HIGHWAY 133
CARBONDALE COLORADO, 81623
PH: (970)340-4130 F:(866)876-5873
COFFMAN'S CORNER
3006 FRYING PAN RD.
EAGLE COUNTY , COLORADO
1 PERMIT SET 7/2/2021 TRS
C8DRIVEWAY P&PCHECKED BY:#DESCRIPTION DATE DRAWN BYCONSTRUCTION DRAWN BY:JOB #:2021-24NOT FORTRSRBGROARING FORK ENGINEERING
592 HIGHWAY 133
CARBONDALE COLORADO, 81623
PH: (970)340-4130 F:(866)876-5873
COFFMAN'S CORNER
3006 FRYING PAN RD.
EAGLE COUNTY , COLORADO
1 PERMIT SET 7/2/2021 TRS
oeoeoeoeoeoeoeoeC9FIRE ACCESS P&PCHECKED BY:#DESCRIPTION DATE DRAWN BYCONSTRUCTION DRAWN BY:JOB #:2021-24NOT FORTRSRBGROARING FORK ENGINEERING
592 HIGHWAY 133
CARBONDALE COLORADO, 81623
PH: (970)340-4130 F:(866)876-5873
COFFMAN'S CORNER
3006 FRYING PAN RD.
EAGLE COUNTY , COLORADO
1 PERMIT SET 7/2/2021 TRS
XXXEC10DRY HYDRANT P&PCHECKED BY:#DESCRIPTION DATE DRAWN BYCONSTRUCTION DRAWN BY:JOB #:2021-24NOT FORTRSRBGROARING FORK ENGINEERING
592 HIGHWAY 133
CARBONDALE COLORADO, 81623
PH: (970)340-4130 F:(866)876-5873
COFFMAN'S CORNER
3006 FRYING PAN RD.
EAGLE COUNTY , COLORADO
1 PERMIT SET 7/2/2021 TRS
C11FIRE TANK DETAILS-1CHECKED BY:#DESCRIPTION DATE DRAWN BYCONSTRUCTION DRAWN BY:JOB #:2021-24NOT FORTRSRBGROARING FORK ENGINEERING
592 HIGHWAY 133
CARBONDALE COLORADO, 81623
PH: (970)340-4130 F:(866)876-5873
COFFMAN'S CORNER
3006 FRYING PAN RD.
EAGLE COUNTY , COLORADO
1 PERMIT SET 7/2/2021 TRS
C12FIRE TANK DETAILS-1CHECKED BY:#DESCRIPTION DATE DRAWN BYCONSTRUCTION DRAWN BY:JOB #:2021-24NOT FORTRSRBGROARING FORK ENGINEERING
592 HIGHWAY 133
CARBONDALE COLORADO, 81623
PH: (970)340-4130 F:(866)876-5873
COFFMAN'S CORNER
3006 FRYING PAN RD.
EAGLE COUNTY , COLORADO
1 PERMIT SET 7/2/2021 TRS
oeoeECHECKED BY:#DESCRIPTION DATE DRAWN BYCONSTRUCTION DRAWN BY:JOB #:2021-24NOT FORTRSRBGROARING FORK ENGINEERING
592 HIGHWAY 133
CARBONDALE COLORADO, 81623
PH: (970)340-4130 F:(866)876-5873
COFFMAN'S CORNER
3006 FRYING PAN RD.
EAGLE COUNTY , COLORADO
1 PERMIT SET 7/2/2021 TRS
C13GRADING
C14EAST STORM DRAINCHECKED BY:#DESCRIPTION DATE DRAWN BYCONSTRUCTION DRAWN BY:JOB #:2021-24NOT FORTRSRBGROARING FORK ENGINEERING
592 HIGHWAY 133
CARBONDALE COLORADO, 81623
PH: (970)340-4130 F:(866)876-5873
COFFMAN'S CORNER
3006 FRYING PAN RD.
EAGLE COUNTY , COLORADO
1 PERMIT SET 7/2/2021 TRS
C15WEST STORM DRAINCHECKED BY:#DESCRIPTION DATE DRAWN BYCONSTRUCTION DRAWN BY:JOB #:2021-24NOT FORTRSRBGROARING FORK ENGINEERING
592 HIGHWAY 133
CARBONDALE COLORADO, 81623
PH: (970)340-4130 F:(866)876-5873
COFFMAN'S CORNER
3006 FRYING PAN RD.
EAGLE COUNTY , COLORADO
1 PERMIT SET 7/2/2021 TRS
C16DRAINAGECHECKED BY:#DESCRIPTION DATE DRAWN BYCONSTRUCTION DRAWN BY:JOB #:2021-24NOT FORTRSRBGROARING FORK ENGINEERING
592 HIGHWAY 133
CARBONDALE COLORADO, 81623
PH: (970)340-4130 F:(866)876-5873
COFFMAN'S CORNER
3006 FRYING PAN RD.
EAGLE COUNTY , COLORADO
1 PERMIT SET 7/2/2021 TRS
oeoeoeoeEC17OWTS SYSTEMCHECKED BY:#DESCRIPTION DATE DRAWN BYCONSTRUCTION DRAWN BY:JOB #:2021-24NOT FORTRSRBGROARING FORK ENGINEERING
592 HIGHWAY 133
CARBONDALE COLORADO, 81623
PH: (970)340-4130 F:(866)876-5873
COFFMAN'S CORNER
3006 FRYING PAN RD.
EAGLE COUNTY , COLORADO
1 PERMIT SET 7/2/2021 TRS
Kbi
x···*Service contracts available for maintenance············C18OWTS DETAILSCHECKED BY:#DESCRIPTION DATE DRAWN BYCONSTRUCTION DRAWN BY:JOB #:2021-24NOT FORTRSRBGROARING FORK ENGINEERING
592 HIGHWAY 133
CARBONDALE COLORADO, 81623
PH: (970)340-4130 F:(866)876-5873
COFFMAN'S CORNER
3006 FRYING PAN RD.
EAGLE COUNTY , COLORADO
1 PERMIT SET 7/2/2021 TRS
XC7SITE PLANCHECKED BY:#DESCRIPTION DATE DRAWN BYCONSTRUCTION DRAWN BY:JOB #:2021-24FORTRSRBGROARING FORK ENGINEERING
592 HIGHWAY 133
CARBONDALE COLORADO, 81623
PH: (970)340-4130 F:(866)876-5873
COFFMAN'S CORNER
3006 FRYING PAN RD.
EAGLE COUNTY , COLORADO
TRSSITE PLAN UPDATE 05/16/20232
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
TRSCHANGE ORDER NO.6 06/20/2023Any depiction of the 200 Foot Railroad Rights of Way hereon is for illustrationpurposes only, in support of Owner's development applications with EagleCounty. Owner believes the Frying Pan Road Right of Way is 33 feet wide andreserves all rights and claims regarding the same.