The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About715 Andorra Rd - 210701303017INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PERMIT EAGLE COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION P.O. Box 179 - 500 Broadway • Eagle, CO 81631 Telephone: (970) 328-8755 COPY OF PERMIT MUST BE POSTED AT INSTALLATION SITE. PERMIT NO. 1804-98 BP NO. 12075 OWNER: JULIA WATKINS PHONE: 970-926-1961 MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 1634 EDWARDS CO 81632 APPLICANT: SAME PHONE: SYSTEM LOCATION: 715 ANDORRA ROAD, EDWARDS, CO TAX PARCEL NO. 2107-013-03-017 LICENSED INSTALLER: SILVER TIP CONSTRUCTION, KEITH PEARSON LICENSE NO. 32-98 PHONE: 970-845-4124 DESIGN ENGINEER: LKP ENGINEERING, LUIZA PETROVSKA PHONE NO. 970-827-9088 INSTALLATION HEREBY GRANTED FOR THE FOLLOWING: 1500 GALLON SEPTIC TANK 1125 SQUARE FEET OF ABSORPTION AREA VIA 36 INFILTRATOR UNITS PER DESIGN SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS: INSTALL AS PER ENGINEER'S DESIGN DATED 7/1/98. ENGINEER TO VERIFY SOIL CONDITION PRIOR TO INSTAL- LATION IN NEW LOCATION. ENGINEER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR FINAL INSPECTION. BUILDING CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL NOT BE ISSUED WITHOUT SEPTIC SYSTEM FINAL APPROVAL. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH APPROVAL- `aim DATE: AUGUST 17, 1998 CONDITIONS: 1. ALL INSTALLATIONS MUST COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE EAGLE COUNTY INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM REGULATIONS, ADOPTED PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GRANTED IN 25-10-104, 1973, AS AMENDED. 2. THIS PERMIT IS VALID ONLY FOR CONNECTION TO STRUCTURES WHICH HAVE FULLY COMPLIED WITH COUNTY ZONING AND BUILDING REQUIREMENTS, CONNECTION TO OR USE WITH ANY DWELLING OR STRUCTURE NOT APPROVED BY THE ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENTS SHALL AUTOMATICALLY BE A VIOLATION OF A REQUIREMENT OF THE PERMIT BOTH LEGAL ACTION AND REVOCATION OF THE PERMrr. 3. CHAPTER IV, SECTION 4.03.29 REQUIRES ANY PERSON WHO CONSTRUCTS, ALTERS OR INSTALLS AN INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM TO BE LICENSED. FINAL APPROVAL OF SYSTEM (TO BE COMPLETED BY INSPECTOR): NO SYSTEM SHALL BE DEEMED TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE EAGLE COUNTY INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM REGULATIONS UNTIL THE SYSTEM IS APPROVED PRIOR TO COVERING ANY PORTION OF THE SYSTEM. INSTALLED ABSORPTION OR DISPERSAL AREA: 1125 SQUAREFEET(VIA16 TNFTT.TRATnR TTNTTC ) INSTALLED CONCRETE SEPTICTANK:1500 GALLONS IS LOCATED DEGREES AND _ FEET FROM SEE SITE PLAN FOR SYSTFM COMPONENT T.nnATTnNS_ COMMENTS: ENGINEER FINAL CERTIFICATION RFCFTVRD 1 f 1 2.4no VFRTFTCATTON nF CT.F.AN OTTT IN- STALLATION RECEIVED FROM GEORGE HOYT, BUTT.DTNG TNRPF.CTnR, AT nn TNSPFCTTnN nm 1.491.4nn THE TANK IS LARGE ENOUGH FOR 5 BEDROOMS, RTTT TuF T.FACu FTF.T.TI Ig STZRD FOR 4 BFDROOMS ANY ITEM NOT MEETING REQUIREMENTS WILL BE CORRECTED BEFORE FINAL APPROVAL OF SYSTEM IS MADE. ARRANGE A RE -INSPECTION WHEN WORK IS COMPLETED. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH APPROVAL AtIAZL. �J 4 DATE: FEBRUARY 3. 2000 Incomplete'Applications Will NOT Be Accepted •(Slkte Plan MUST be attached) ISDS Permit # I VO t "u l Building Permit # 1�-0'26 APPLICATION FOR INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PERMIT ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH OFFICE. - EAGLE COUNTY P. O. BOX 179 EAGLE, CO 81631 328-8755/927-3823 (Basalt) ************************************************************************** * PERMIT APPLICATION FEE '$150.00 PERCOLATION TEST FEE $200.00 * MAKE ALL REMITTANCE PAYABLE'.TO: "EAGLE COUNTY TREASURER" PROPERTY OWNER: MAILING ADDRESS . +-,;; 1� v 1 ] 1n _1`1 � k l punrry • F'NAi --Zi APPLICANT/CONTACT"PERSON: LICENSED SYSTEMS CONT COMPANY / DBA : i4i {NP 1 � ********************* r iw PHONE: q ®D 6 N PHONE: PERMIT APPLICATION IS FOR: (V/ NEW INSTALLATION ( ) ALTERATION ( ) REPAIR LOCATION OF PROPOSED INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM: Legal Description: +�T 5 r� / V I�;i Or\ Tax Parcel Number: 16 % 13 0'/ Lot Size: Physical Address: � u�' �I�DQ ,�e W=>OA7 ? Cc) BUILDING,.,TYPE:. (Check applicable category) (V�Residential/Single Family Number of Bedrooms ( ) Residential/Multi-Family* Number of Bedrooms ( ) Commercial/Industrial* Type TYPE OF WATER SUPPLY: ( ) Well ( ) l ' Public Name *These systems require w &:?, 3 , cop -Di (Check applicable category) Spring ( ) Surface i of Supplier:2 SIGNATURE: *********** *************** AMOUNT PAID: l� u, c tit,- vvPc- j 'I'l t t T, cT y a Registered Professional Eng' eer Date: 1`d'Jh3lqg, RECEIPT #: I 6 DATE: g CHECK #: CASHIER: Community Development Department (970)328-8730 FAX (970) 328-7185 TDD (970) 328-8797 Email: eccmdeva@vail.net http: //www.eagle-county.com February 3, 2000 Julia Watkins P.O. Box 1634 Edwards, CO 81632 EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO Eagle County Building P.O. Box 179 500 Broadway Eagle, Colorado 81631-0179 RE: Final of ISDS Permit #1804-98, Tax Parcel #2107-013-03-017. Property location: 715 Andora Rd., Edwards, CO. Dear Ms. Watkins: This letter is to inform you that the above referenced ISDS Permit has been inspected and finalized. Enclosed is a copy to retain for your records. This permit does not indicate compliance with any other Eagle County requirements. Also enclosed is a brochure regarding the care of your septic system. Be aware that later changes to your building may require appropriate alterations of your septic system. If you have any questions regarding this permit, please contact the Eagle County Environmental Health Division at (970) 328-8755. Sincerely, Janet Kohl Environmental Health Department Eagle County Community Development ENCL: Informational Brochure Final ISDS Permit cc: files Community Development Department (970)328-8730 FAX (970) 328-7185 TDD (970) 328-8797 Email: eccmdeva@vail.net http: //www.eagle-county.com EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO Date: August 17, 1998 TO: Silver Tip Construction Eagle County Building P.O. Box 179 500 Broadway Eagle, Colorado 81631-0179 FROM: Environmental Health Division RE: Issuance of Individual Sewage Disposal System Permit No. 1804-98. Tax Parcel # 2107-013-03-017. Property Location: 715 Andorra Road, Edwards, CO., Watkins residence. Enclosed is your ISDS Permit No. 1804-98. It is valid for 120 days. The enclosed copy of the permit must be posted at the installation site. Any changes in plans or specifications invalidates the permit unless otherwise approved. Systems designed by a Registered Professional Engineer must be certified by the Engineer indicating that the system was installed as specified. Eagle County does not perform final inspections on engineer designed systems. Your TCO will not be issued until our office receives this certification. Permit specifications are minimum requirements only, and should be brought to the property owner's attention. This permit does not indicate conformance with other Eagle County requirements. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact the Environmental Health Division at 328- 8755. cc: files LKP Engineering, Luiza Petrovska (9C COMPLETE ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC. SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION AND ENGINEERING ANALYSIS PROPOSED SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Lot 59, Filing 3, Cordillera Subdivision .Eagle County, Colorado Propared For; Mr. Marquis Sauvngo Post -It' Fax Note 7$71 date t a .q$ pa9les0, To c-A FfvC•ET- From Lu I Z c, 00,/Dept, C—O U t I� Co L1(- T pC U G .I Phone Phone �► 9 CAP— Z2 56 j 3 _ I � � �r Fax # 913 Fax N r Pr*joct No. 99.=985 Ottobrr 22139PS 912 hNEL,FTH STREET 0 GOLDEN. COLO ADO 80401 * t3031 279fi418 1 FAX: 279•8350 LKt- tM31NttN1N[3. 1NG PAGE 02 s COPE ♦ . . . . . • . a . . . • . • • . • • . . ♦ . . • . . • . • f • . • • • . • f • a r • • • . . • • • f • ♦ ♦ • Y ♦ r 1 PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION AND iSYTE CONDITIONS ...................... I SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS...............................�..........2 FOUNDATION R�COMAiE�ipATIONS.....................................4 INTERIOR FLOW SLAB C0XSTRVCTX0N.................. » , . • .... , ... , 4 DRAIN SYSTEMS....................+.....o.....................•.J� FOUNDATION LAWN AND LhRBAOSCC�CAFPYELLr. =•.f U.. p.T„V•N......•. s, • .r.• p. • , ... • ... • ... . ..... . ... fs . . .. . e • • • . . . f • ♦ • . . . . • ► a 6 PERCOJ.A,rION TES'1'�'Ie(3r • o • • ► • s . . • • • • • r • • • . r • . • . • • • . . r • s . a • r . a • • • • . % INSPECTION AND CONSULVATTON...............•.•......•...........e TEST HOLE LOCATION i�LAN.................................Figure 1 TEST HOLE LAGS.....•• .................................•........ SWELL-C:ONSOLID,i AXON TEST RESULTO....... , ♦ ........... • . • .. • • .... 3 DRAIN SYSTEM DSO'AIL................. .•............ .............4 PERCOLATION TEST R$SALTS...♦......♦..............♦4......Table 1 0 LKh' LNUINLLNINU, 1NU PAGE 03 0 PROJUT NO. 934663 October 22, 1993 Page ! A 4eotechnical and geological engineering investigation was conducted at the sit* of a proposed single family residence to be constructed in Lot 59, Filing 3, Cordillera. Subdivision, Eagle County, Colorado. The investigation was conducted to determine the beat type of foundation system for the structure and determine percolation rate of sc►,ila in the proposed absorption bed areas. Recommendations For designs and construction based on Broil Ahd groundwater conditions have also been given. - information contained heroin ie based or, a field and laboratory investigation and experience with similar projects, The atructure will be a one to two story single f&Mily residence with a full depth or walk -out basement. A wood frame, wood or masonry veneer superstruoture will be supported by a reinforced concrete foundation. The site is currently v*cant and is located within a partially developed portion of the subdivision on a gently sloping, southwest facing hillside near the bottom of a narrow valley. vegetation within the proposed construction arena consists of sage brush, juniper trees, sparse brush, native grasses and other ground cover plants. There has been no significant disturbance of the surface within recant history. Thera are no apparent geologic hazards which vaay effect the proposed construction. -11.y' 1- il.'Y1 71G`OLf-717C'7 LKF- LNU1NFLKINU, INC PAGE 04 PAod6CT Ho, 93.8"3 04tober 22, 4Si43 Page 2 Subsurfaaa oonditiono were investigated by drilling two fecundation design test holes within the approximate building area and one soil profile hole and t2 r*e percolation test holes in the anticipated absorption bed (laach'field) area. Teat hole locations are shown in Figure 1 R Test Hole Location Plan. Foundation design test holes were drilled to a depth of 20 feet and samples were taken at various intervals based on soils encountered and anticipated foundation bearing depths. The soil profile hale was drilled to a depth of ton feet and auger cuttings were logged. Lithologic loge of test holes are presented in Figure 2, Teat Hola Logs. Standard Penetration tooting was conducted to obtain relatively undisturbed samples and determine relative density/hardness of subsurface strata. Sgzpleo were takers at various intervals based on anticipated foundation bearing depths and subsurface conditions Results of standard penetration tests are shown in Figure 2. Soil thickness ranged from nine to over twenty feat in the test holes. Soil has been derived from slope wash, latndalidem and in- eitu weathering of underlying rook and contains fragments of unweathered shale and sandstone. It is generally a very silty, slightly to moderately clayey, very fine grained, loose to medium dense, brown to light brown stand and sandy clay. The top two to three feet contains low to moderate amounts of organic material. Much of the sail is a landslide deposit. The landslide is relotivsly old and theta is no indication of current slope Movement or potential for future landslides. 0 v r r -' 1 J V I J.. •ti LKF' LNUINELKi NG, INC PAGE 05 P40JECT WO. 93.9"l Aetobor x41, 1993 Page 3 Underlying they soil is reddi.ssh-brown to gray to 'tan, thin to very thin bedded shales mudstonee and sandstones of the Eagle Vallee' Formation. Bedrock contaits randoit lenses and beads of light brown dolomita. No significant dolomite beds were encountered in test borings. Most rock within the depth investigated is slightly weathered to unweathered, rtedium hard, and poorly Cemented. Dolomite beds are very well cemented and very hard and may be encountered d during foundation excavation. Silty sands may have Modtrate to high consolidation potential. No samples were obtai.neil for testing, however, experience in the vicinity and with sizatlar soils indioatea significant settlement may occur if soils become mea vaturaatead. Surface and subsurface drainage design is critical, to prevent saturation or foundation support soila. Two samples of relay from T11-1 at four feet and TH-2 at nine feet was tested to determine eWrll-consolidation potOntial6 Results of these tests are presented in rigors 3. Testing indicated the clay h4v no swell paterntial. The samples did not awall when saturated and loaded with a 1000 paf Pureharge. The samples c0ns0lidated a. maximum of 0,5 percent. No groundwater was enoouhteered during the drilling operations or when checked 24 hours later. DUO to the geologic and topographic location of the site, it is unlikoly that a shallow groundwater tab? d will exist below the site in the foreseeable future. Minor perched water tables May wrist during period* of excess preoi,pi- tation and surface Water inflow. V r 1.J'r .L JJV 11. Y1 J r G-oc r -�uo� Lt\r UNUIM-r-MINUS INN Ub PROACT 00. 93.2"3 Octab*r 22, 1O93 Page 4 Based on the soils encountered and experience with similar sub- surface condit.ioney the structure should be placed on conventional spread footings designed for a maximum contaot pressure of 1509. p3f. . contact pressure should be calculated using full dead lead plus full live load. Fobtinge should be proportioned as much as possible to provide even loading and help prevent differential settlement. Allowable contact pressures have been calculated assuming founda- tions will be placed a minft= of four feet below the existing groand surface and will be backfilled on one side only. Footings should be constructed on undisturbed natural soils or badrack which are a MOOth, even and free of largo rocks or debris. FoOtingS should not be conettucted on frozen or saturated mate:r- iala. . Foundation walls should be designed to withstand a minimum lateral earth pressure equal to an equivalent fluid pressure of 30 pounds per cubic foot per foot of depth. Ari equivalent fluid pressure of 245 pound per cubic foot per foot of depth can be used for passive soil. resistance. The builder should be aware that concrete Moor slabs pl.aoed on any soil or bedrock may move it support zrsaterials become wet. The only absolute means of preventing slab movement is constmetion of a suspended floor over crawl epeae, z� r f I,Zjr 177❑ I I: 41 v I U-0L t-JUJU LKf' tNUINLLKINU, 1NU PAGE 07 PO4V W041 PS-2663 oarobor 22, 1993 Pap S Potan vial for significant movement from materials present is minimal. if some risk of movement can be tolerated, the following prvcodiares should be implemented to prolong slab life and promote better slab performance 1. Soils should not be compacted more than lneoe►ssary to allow excavation. The bottom surface of the eMcavation should be thoroughly wetted 24 hours prior to stab placement. 2. concrete slabs should be reinforced with steel mesh and should be separated from all bearing members and utilities to allow independent movement ( i.e., a "floating slab") . 3. Joints should be soared in the slab at max#.mum 200 square toot areas. 4. A minimum void space of two inchoo should be constructed above or below any non-boari,ng partition Malls placed on the slab. in finished areas, any furring strips, dry wall, paneling, etc. should stop a minimum of two inches above the floor slab. S. it hot water heating is used, the piping should not be placed under the floor slab. If forced air heating is used, a flexible c` *nnection should be utilised to allow some movement between the furnaos and the heating ducts. 6. Foundation drain systess and landscaping should be completed in strict compliance with recommendations outlined herein to help prevent wetting of slab support soils. T K Due to the presence of potentially unstable soils at foundation and slab bearing depths and the potential for excessive surface water ,inflow, a drain system should be constructed around the exterior foundation perimeter. The drain system should be vvnstructed in accordance with the details shown in Figure 4 and should be, graded to a sump p1t within the basement area or a gravity outfall. sumps should be fitted with an &Utomatic plump to discharge water a minimum of ton feet from the foundation. 11 V fJ 1U)J 1=t� 11: 41 7IYJ-tiL r-�nt3y LKr ENWNEEHING, ING PAGE 08 PROJECT NO. 93-2"3 Oateber 12, 1"3 ps" 6 Particular Attention should be givon to piacing polyethylene along the bottom of the drain and up the foundation wall and to proper grading of drain pipe. 1-mproper grading, such as high or low spots in the drain pips, oould load to drain fatluree and over wetting of foundation bearing soils resulting in damage to the foundation and superstructurm. FO_ LZH=lON MCU31 Backfill placed Against foundation walls should be free of Crash and fragments of rook over sic inches in maxi.inum diameter, moistened, and compacted to a minimum of 85 percent of modified Proctor density. Controlled puddling sbeap uld „no&_ -bar usjkd. roundati®n walls should be a mi.nimux of &even days old prior to backfilling. All walls over four feet high should have floor system& in place or be well braoad to prevent damage from lateral pressure. The arga surrounding foundation walls should Dave a positive slope away from they walls. -A one toot drop in; elevation for the first ten feet away from walls is recommen4ede The owner should pgri odically inspect the surface around the Foundation to locate and correct grading problems which may due to settlement of foundation backfill. Due to the unstable natures of soils when they area saturated, lawn and landscaping irrigation should be cantzollod as much to possible to prevent additional wetting of subsoils.! Sprinkling system heads C 0 LKt" tNtzliYttK1N3} 1NL PAGE 09 PROUCT RO. 93•2"1 Wt*Wr al, 1993 Page 7 should be placed so that; spray does not fall within five feet, of foundation wells. Decorative landscaping, such as rack and/gar bark should be used in areas directly adjacent to foundation walls. Shrubbery planted within fives feet of foundation walls should be hand watered and this watering should be minimized. Downspouts aknd sill oaaks should not be allowed to discharge directly onto the ground surface. Splash blacks and/or downspout extensions should be used wherever possible to discharge water beyond the limits of foundation backfill where3 backfill soils are not covered by pavement and/or sidewalks. * 10 . _ • 'three percolation texts gore conducted in the vicinity of the proposed personal oewage disposal system :absorption bed in locations shown an Fiqure 1. Teats were conducted in compliance with Eagle County Health Department regulations. Results are presented, in Table 1. Testa indicate soils have an average percolation rate of 5.6 minutes per inch. Based on this value and the ,soil profile determi-'ned, installation of a standard absorption bed should be possible, The system nay not requira design by ra licensed Professional Engineer. In any subsurface ihVestigation it is necessary to assume condi- tions encountered in the field investigation are representative of 0 [.J r0 l'ir L ZOO 0 11. 41 LKt- LNUINEEHING, INC PAGE 10 FROOKOT WO. WHO oetab*r 22, 1"1 P666 a the site. Thera are coaasione where actual conditions differ from those encountered during the Field inveati.gatien Subsurface conditions should be Verifi*d through visual inspection of thefoundation excavation by a representative of this office prier to foundation construction, Forting construction and drain system construction should also be inspected to insure compliance with those riaomendati.ons. I am available to discuss the content$ of this report with you. Please contaot me ii you have questions gr when further consulta- tion or inspections *► a required. complete Engineering Services. Inc,, Edward D. Ford, P.S. 10 0 V fr 1:Jf l770 il:4l rG—tst r—yryy LKH ENGINEERING, INC TEST HOLE LOCATION PLAN LOT 590 PILING 3 CORDILLORk SUDDMSION 8DWARDS, COLORADO 6 TH-2 RXPUNATION PAGE 11 46 TH-- i FOUNDATION DESIGN TEST HOLE ToIK hot" wort located using #aping ttnd mop Q P� 1 PERCOLATION TEST HOLEmavwA.ment. Loaatfana oh"All bo mmoldared aaeurvkr Way to the dagme impttod by the PROJECT No. `,•►fir--� 92-2863 "��% COMPLETE ENGINEERING SERVICES FIGURE 1 'Uri Jruf L »0 II. i+1 rCl-i3t r-7CJGy LKF- LNUI NLLHiNU, 1NG PAGE 12 VEST HOLE LOGS TH--2 SANDI' fine grained, very silty, silght� clayey, ldese► #iiyhtty indict, It bn► (SW 9EDROCK; l agie Vailey Farmattan, interbedded eanditone, mudatons & s�'7ole, hard to very hard, eAghti malst, w►lathgred taP 4-15', gray —red, CLAY, slape wash, silly, •lightly grayafty, w/fr"rhents of wtothered bedrock, msdlum stiff to otlff, M01st, gnagry—red—bn, LCL/SMj, tndlcgtss location of standard penetration test Indlentes 13 blows with a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inch#s were required s-L to drive a 2,51, diameter •ampler 12 1r4hy, S-C Indlcatss sample test*d !or Swell-consaliclatlan potential. Indlcotes appraximgts bCad*n of boundary between iithologic unita. Pranalllon may be gradual. PROJECT AID. �.� a..+ 9s--2863 "'"l COMPLETE ENGINEERING SERVICES pIGURE g u W e rr wor i�J7rtj 11:41 Efcrr ENUINELKINUl INC PAGE 13 PERCUATION TIMT RIISULTO PRwRGT N0. -M- OATEN j2gA&j, TatiMICIAN _ TEST HCU 140. „L 'TOTAL ORPIN , FT DRpTR Tp 1iAT[R „�fT READ UQ CW 49 IN ELA0I110 MWOLATIOE , mF, t1n1 OERiR tins T115 tOini lATE i�e9p/Iry�_ __ 09a40 10113 g3.j i4.1► 3S 3.1 10119 39.8 11E11LL •• -• IMS 29.0 6.6 10150 U.0 "FILL -• •. •i1ig0 U.0 4.0 30 3.7 11 M 36.0 REFILL MOO 299.4 6.6 30 t►.! _1213§ 23.2 6.3' -....�...�� MT MOLE NO. J,_ TOTAL OWN - 3.4 .,. FT E EPIN TO WATER w R•a ^TT IINE ___ RIIAO I N{I (in) CUNN 19 �DIUN. LiPlLs --__ ;PERCOLAT IOM SATE tistn/ia) 09=�i2 11.yay . '..1 tOr1s I9ri g 12*5 7i iaV 10t17 311 MOM •• •• 10:43 21.0 11.9 M.3 10i30 33.0 REFILL. •• •• 11120 21.0 12.0 $0 2.3 11233 $3.3 REli(L •• •• 12:03 _ 12.19 22.s 12.1 10.E JA 30 ti 1.J 6 T+► TIOT 00L1 N®. .1_ TOTAL MTN .Lj_ pT DIPTN TO VATER ,jj fT RMO IIIM MUM 14 ELA►3ED PEROOLAT ION TINg t1n) ... �M'TN. (Im _.jIWF tote) wIYTE t,�t llnf 00144 30.0 .. 10113 19,3 11.5 31 Z.t Ia.-IT 31.9 RIFILL •• IOC45 22.1 9.0 Ri 2.i 1060 31.3 09FILL •° •• 111to 22.0 10.3 30 2,9 11136 32.3 WILL •• •• 12806 93.3 },0 3Q 3.3 --------3A Ta c-at 19* inliaat*6 watue used to calculate estop percolation rota AVERAW MC♦9l.ATI M RATE ■ 5.6 i@tMl M M too V1f 14F LUUQ 10. 1)0 7fCJ-7L4-7KJ i57 LKr LNUINLLNINU, 1NU t"AUL UG LIEF Engineeme Inc October 23, 1998 Ms. Julia Watkins Renaissance Building & Ilsi 11',0. Box 576 Edwards, CO 81632 Dear Julia: RE: WPectiOl t-Of Septic Syatem Installation Lot 54 Cordillera Subdivision Filing No. 3 Eag1ti C. ounty,`.Colorado Prolft-tNp. 968 - Permit No.1804-98 At the request of Keith Pears+on:&m Silver Tip Con u+ction, . on October 7, 1998, we visited the construction site on Lot 59, Codiiltra Subdivision Filing Nc#.Eagla ounM Colorado. The purpose of our site visit was to observe the iiW- lat-W of the septic sys . They installed the system' -in ove ail compliance with._*e septic system design; Drawing No. 9898SD.DWG, dated July 1, 1998. The S tern was installed sho*xiou the above named drawing, but was not connected to the residence. Theynstalled 1500-gal , two 06tnpartments, a precast, concrete septic tank. The tank will have risers on both inspection coves. From a tank to the first Infiltrator trench was 20 feet. Thirty-six Standard Infiltrator Ciphers were instal . jn tip trenches with 12 Infiltrators each. The infiltrators were connected with sedif-distribution. In thi�Ihst inhhriator of each trench, inspection ports were installed. Horizontal, ditance'nm center to centep..of the:u�nches, was 9 feet or more. All piping was SIJR-35, 4-inch PVC. The &-Olh of the trenches v s two *Aree feet. The soil profile in the trenches was consistent with the sb it des&kbed in the report l CoinpI6W Engineering Services, Inc. If you have any questions;. please do not hesitate to call. cc, Ms. Heather Savalox, E206 CouEnvironmental) tth DM. -Sion, . e }S50� (:.%OFFICMWFW MWPDOCS%9s9e05]. WPD 1'.0. Box 2837, Edwards, Coln io 81632 * (97012- 6.9088Tfel * (970) 926-9089 Fax Tnk 1-'1 Z-nfMMM -r"I 1 MA . 77r1M TM. r7n.-1 C e-nj Ik ITV Ck 11 1 1 bill TI.1 1804-98 Tax #2107-013-03-17 JQg NAME Lot #59, Filing 3 WATKINS Cordillera Subdivision - V-0 715 Andorra Rd. Jo$ NO.a o72M LOCATION 1 BILL TO DATE ST7RTED I DATE COMPLETED DATE BILLED • b • ,[ � •�L.. �: `.fit.. / �� .�' � i�_ �' -ji�►J LI ��/�/� AL�1t� El EIIIE VA /71 7. Imi� OWTV.—drd'"llw� MR - mm NINE OR wi� 11111115111111's I JOB COST SUMMARY r� ... = - �� •� - -,M.._r. - NEIN TOTAL MATERIAL .22 .51 Err/ ME TOTAL•= COST LESS OVERHEAD ._ NET PROFIT JOB FOLDER Product 277 JOB FOLDER Printed in U.S.A.