HomeMy WebLinkAbout474 Eagle Crest - 210518203002 - 1787-98ISINDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PERMIT
EAGLE COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION
P.O. Box 179 - 500 Broadway • Eagle, CO 81631
Telephone: (970) 328-8755
COPY OF PERMIT MUST BE POSTED AT INSTALLATION SITE. PERMIT NO. 1787-98 BP NO. 12059
OWNER: RICHARD AND GERALDINE PANTER PHONE: 970-748-1105
MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 4285 AVON CO 81620
APPLICANT: PETE DEHNERT PHONE: 970-949-0531
SYSTEM LOCATION: 474 EAGLE CREST RD., EDWARDS CO TAXPARCELNO. 2105-182-03-002
LICENSED INSTALLER: GARY DEFINA CONSTRUCTION y LICENSE . 44-98 PHONE: 970-926-9469
uou
DESIGN ENGINEER: PHONE NO.
INSTALLATION HEREBY GRANTED FOR THE FOLLOWING: FOR 3 BEDROOMS, 1000 GALLON TANK, 844 SO' OF ABSORPTION AREA VIA 28
INFILTRATOR UNITS. FOR 4 BEDROOMS, 1250 GALLON SEPTIC TANK 1125 SQUARE FEET OF ABSORPTION AREA VIA 37 INFILTRATOR
UNITS AS REQUESTED BY GENERAL CONTRACTOR.
SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS: INSTALL IN SERIAL DISTRIBUTION IN TRENCHES WITH A CLEANOUT BETWEEN THE TANK AND THE HOUSE
AND INSPECTION PORTALS IN EACH TRENCH. RAKE TRENCH SURFACES TO PREVENT SMEARING OF SOILS. CALL EAGLE COUNTY ENVI-
RONMENTAL HEALTH FOR FINAL INSPECTION PRIOR TO BACK FILLING ANY PART OF THE INSTALLATION OR WITH QUESTIONS REGARD-
ING INSTALLATION. BUILDING CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY
WILL NOT BE ISSUED WITHOUT FINAL APPROVAL OF SEPTIC SYSTEM.
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH APPROVAL: w i:-�U'"�' DATE: AUGUST13,1998
CONDITIONS:
1. ALL INSTALLATIONS MUST COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE EAGLE COUNTY INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM REGULATIONS,
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GRANTED IN 25-10-104, 1973, AS AMENDED.
2. THIS PERMIT IS VALID ONLY FOR CONNECTION TO STRUCTURES WHICH HAVE FULLY COMPLIED WITH COUNTY ZONING AND BUILDING
REQUIREMENTS, CONNECTION TO OR USE WITH ANY DWELLING OR STRUCTURE NOT APPROVED BY THE ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENTS
SHALL AUTOMATICALLY BE A VIOLATION OF A REQUIREMENT OF THE PERMIT BOTH LEGAL ACTION AND REVOCATION OF THE PERMIT.
3. CHAPTER IV, SECTION 4.03.29 REQUIRES ANY PERSON WHO CONSTRUCTS, ALTERS OR INSTALLS AN INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM TO
BE LICENSED.
FINAL APPROVAL OF SYSTEM (TO BE COMPLETED BY INSPECTOR):
NO SYSTEM SHALL BE DEEMED TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE EAGLE COUNTY INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM REGULATIONS UNTIL
THE SYSTEM IS APPROVED PRIOR TO COVERING ANY PORTION OF THE SYSTEM.
INSTALLED ABSORPTION OR DISPERSAL AREA: 930 SQUAREFEET(VIA 30 TNFTT.TRATOR ITNTTS )
INSTALLED POLYETHELENE TANK: 1250 GALLONS IS LOCATED 260 DEGREES AND1218TEET FROMTHE CLEANOUT
COMMENTS: THE SFPTTC TANK TS LARGF. FNOTTGH FOR 4 BFDROOMS, BITT THE TYACH FTELT) TS ONLY
LARGE ENOUGH FOR 3.
ANY ITEM NOT MEETING REQUIREMENTS WILL BE CORRECTED BEFORE FINAL APPROVAL OF SYSTEM IS MADE. ARRANGE A RE -INSPECTION WHEN
WORK IS COMPLETED.
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH APPROVAL . l 1 Y 1l1 %�I41 ciJ 7U DATE: NOVEMBER 9 , 19 9 8
Inuomplete'Applications Will NOT Be Accepted
(mite Plan MUST be attached)
ISDS Permit # / ! S 7" G 0
Building Permit ,
APPLICATION FOR INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PERMIT
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH OFFICE. --EAGLE COUNTY
P. O. BOX 179
EAGLE, CO 81631
328-8755/927-3823 (Basalt)
**************************************************************************
* PERMIT APPLICATION FEE $150.00 PERCOLATION TEST FEE $200.00
* MAKE ALL REMITTANCE PAYABLE'.TO: "EAGLE COUNTY TREASURER'S
PROPERTY OWNER: S :'RO,1,,AQ •f - a\AIS
MAILING ADDRESS: $ h 9 aD GD $) tom
APPLICANT/CONTACT PERSON:t
PHONE: I I O--'
PHONE:
LICENSED SYSTEMS` CONTRACTOR: lCEW6_ PHONE:
COMPANY/ DBA : �C'h �((,l f� YIS�Gtc�i 6"k- In [ ADDRESS: �r � c� �d�i t �0 X&J
************************************************************* ***********
PERMIT APPLICATION IS FOR: fY) NEW INSTALLATION ( ) ALTERATION ( ) REPAIR
LOCATION OF PROPOSED INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM:
Legal Description:
-t-
Tax Parcel Number:
! OJ -
f 43, 06
Lot Size:
Physical Address:
BUILDING TYPE:. (Check applicable category)
( ) Residential/Single Family
(k) Residential/Multi-Family*
( ) Commercial/Industrial*
TYPE OF WATER SUPPLY:
( ) Well ( )
(�) Public—__.Naa
*These
SIGNATURE:.✓/
AMOUNT PAID.
(Check applicable category)
Spring ( ) Surface
of Su vvl-i-er :
Number of Bedrooms
Number of Bedrooms F,
Type
a Registered Professional Engineer
Date:
RECEIPT 1: 0 '73 1 DATE: (a !�
CHECK #: .30 03 CASHIER:
Community Development Department
(970) 328-8730
FAX (970) 328-7185
TDD (970) 328-8797
Email: eccmdeva@vail.net
http: //www.eagle-county.com
EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO
DATE: August 13, 1998
TO: Defina Construction, Inc.
Eagle County Building
P.O. Bois 179
500 Broadway
Eagle, Colorado 81631-0179
FROM: Environmental Health Division
RE: Issuance of Individual Sewage Disposal System Permit No. 1787-98, Tax Parcel
#2105-182-03-002. Property Location: 474 Eagle Crest Rd., Edwards, CO.,
Panter residence.
Enclosed is your ISDS Permit No. 1787-98. It is valid for 120 days. The enclosed copy of the
permit must be posted at the installation site. Any changes in plans or specifications invalidates
the permit unless otherwise approved.
Also enclosed is the ISDS Final Inspection Completeness Form. The items on this form need
to be completed before you call for your final inspection. Also, please note any special
conditions which may have been placed on the permit. If all items are not completed, a
reinspection fee of $42.50 must be paid before a reinspection is made.
Please call our office well in advance to allow for scheduling of final inspection. Your building
permit TCO will not be issued until final approval has been given for the ISDS Permit.
Permit specifications are mil,imum requirements only, and should be brought to the prorerty
owner's attention.
This permit does not indicate conformance with other Eagle County requirements.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact the Environmental Health Division at 328-
8755.
cc: files
Enclosures: ISDS permit # 1787-98; ISDS Final Inspection Completeness Form
Community Development Department
(970)328-8730
FAX (970) 328-7185
TDD (970) 328-8797
Email: eccmdeva@vail.net
http: //www.eagle-county.com
EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO
November 5, 1998
Richard and Geraldine Panter
P.O. Box 4285
Avon, CO 81620
Eagle County Building
P.O. Box 179
500 Broadway
Eagle, Colorado 81631-0179
RE: Final of ISDS Permit #1787-98, Tax Parcel #2105-182-03-002. Property location: 474
Eagle Crest Rd., Edwards, CO.
Dear Mr. & Mrs. Panter:
This letter is to inform you that the above referenced ISDS Permit has been inspected and
finalized. Enclosed is a copy to retain for your records. This permit does not indicate
compliance with any other Eagle County requirements. Also enclosed is a brochure regarding
the care of your septic system.
Be aware that later changes to your building may require appropriate alterations of your septic
system.
If you have any questions regarding this permit, please contact the Eagle County Environmental
Health Division at (970) 328-8755.
Sincerely,
Janet Kohl
Environmental Health Department
Eagle County Community Development
ENCL:Informational Brochure
Final ISDS Permit
cc: files
Received Aug-10-98 08:59am from CCITT G3 d ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH page 2
Awe—ins—s's 09:15 AM P.02
&ter -Mountain
En i neeri n►g Ltd.
July 27, 1998
Jack Panter
PG Sox 4285
Avon, CO 81620
Rr•.: Septic System
14t $, Lake Creek Subdivision
Eagle County, Colorado
Project No, 99-004BG
Genticmen:
0 1 ; 0
RECEIVED
A 1' 0 1 . 1998
EAGLE COUNTY
MMt IqI#Y AVELf3PMENT
Mr. Pme Dclncrt visited our office and informed us that there have bcan changes in the residence.
He indicated that the cart taker unit has boon removed from the proposed plants. His concern is
that this may effect the design of the septic systcni.
The rcinoval of the care tal cr unit will reduce the septic system minimum load requircinents by at
Ramat one bedroom unit. If the septic system is installed as designed, then the: capacity of the; leach
field will b4 slightly over designed. This will not cluange tho effuctiveness of the system, instood
it will have sonic additional capacity.
We, can redesign the system if tho owner dosires, A system resized to acconunodste the septic
system maybe perforrtsed which will result in a reduction of the number if infiltrators and
possibly the size of the septic; tank.
This letter has been prepared for Jack Panter for specific application to the proposed rosidentlal
sgltic systctn to be located on Lot 5, Uako Creek Subdivision, Eagle County, Colorado, Should ;
you have any questions regarding the information eontaincd in this tcyort, please feel fret to
contact thot undersigned.
d'\�Jli4ry y, ,
cI}aid . R' ,
Ceotcchnical Engineering Manager
Ci:krig nMts�kb`•kaereV tr. Ruaer Saptie ryvem
$392 Continental pivlde Rod, Suite 4107 v l.lttleton, 00 80127 • PhWC 303/948 6220 + Feu; 303/'�A8 ir52ti .
3.:
77 Metcalt Road, #200 # Box 978 * Avon, Colorado 81620 • Phone; 303/949,5072 0 Prpm benver 01w't; Q93• f.5'l1 ',vat
Received Aug-10-98 08:59am
AUC-10-99 06315 AM
from CCITT G3 4 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH page i
a.01
v
i , � , hk, P'S�- (, �� a
�, n� -SL (-.%Z 1 4414,7/
Inter,; -Mountain
A&EngineeringLtd.
SOILS AND FOUNDATION INVESTIGATION
FOR
PROPOSED RESIDENCE
i LOT 31, BLOCK 6, LAKE CREEK SUBDIVISION
I
t
EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO
PREPARED FOR:
RICHARD I PANTER
PROJECT NO.96-0368G
111t11
SEPI EMBER 26, 1996
2 '
NAt
��Un � tau►,
r
t
r
E
i
r
77 Metcalf Road, #201 Box 978 Avon, Colorado 81620 Phone: 970-949-5072 From Denver Direct: 893-1531
1420 Vance Street • Lakewood, Colorado 80215 9 Phone: 303-232-0158
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVESUMMARY.................................................................................................................3
SCOPE.................................................................................................................................................3
SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION.........................................................................................3
SITE INVESTIGATION.....................................................................................................................4
SUBSURFACE AND GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS..............................................................4
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION........................................................................................................5
FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATIONS........................................................................................ 5
SLABCONSTRUCTION...................................................................................................................6
GROUNDWATER AND DRAIN SYSTEM..................................................................................... 7
REINFORCING................................................................................................................................... 7
CRAWLSPACE COVER.................................................................................................................. 7
BACKFILL AND SURFACE DRAINAGE....................................................................................... 7
LAWNIRRIGATION......................................................................................................................... 8
MISCELLANEOUS............................................................................................................................ 8
3
EXECUTIVE SL7vVgARY
The project consists of the development and construction of a single family residence on Lot
31, Block 6, Lake Creek Subdivision in Eagle County, Colorado. We anticipate that the proposed
residence will consist of a two story wood frame residence with a basement.
Three soil test borings were performed to help determine the foundation design parameters.
The site has a topsoil layer of approximately 1.5 to 2 feet in thickness. The subsurface soils at the site
consist of brown sandy to clayey SILT to depths of approximately 4 to 9 feet. Underlying the brown
slightly clayey SILT. In boring B-2 and B-2 a gravelly layer was encountered at depths of 10 to 16 feet
and transitioned to a gravel, cobble, and boulder material at depths of 17 to 19 feet. At depths of
approximately 17 feet in boring B-1 weathered rock was encountered. No measurable groundwater
was encountered in the soil test borings at completion.
The foundations at the site may be designed as conventional spread footings based upon a
bearing pressure of 2000 psf.
SCOPE
This report presents the results of a Geotechnical Investigation for the proposed residence to
be constructed on Lot 31, Block 6, Lake Creek Subdivision, in Eagle County, Colorado. The
investigation was performed by advancing soil test borings, obtaining soil samples for laboratory
testing, and presenting our findings in this report.
The purpose of this foundation exploration is to evaluate the soil for foundation support, and
the engineering characteristics of the foundation materials, and to provide criteria from a geotechnical
perspective, for use by the owner in preparing foundation design, grading design, and drainage plans.
SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION
The site is an undeveloped lot located at Lot 31, Block 6, Lake Creek Subdivision near
Edwards, Colorado. The site slopes toward the northwest at gradients estimated to ranged from 5 to
20 percent. The site is partially wooded with pine and aspen trees and the ground surface contains a
grass root mat.
4
SITE INVESTIGATION
The subsurface exploration included a site reconnaissance by an Inter -Mountain Engineering
Personnel and the drilling of three soil test borings to observe the subsurface soil profile and obtain
soil samples for laboratory testing. The soils test borings were performed by a track mounted CME 45
drill rig to the depths indicated in the Summary of Test Borings. The test boring locations were
established in the field by estimating right angles and pacing distances from site features. The
approximate locations of the test borings are illustrated on the Site Plan in the Appendix, refer to
Drawing No. 1. The Appendix also contains Summary of Test Borings presenting the information
which was obtained in the subsurface exploration, a key to the terms used in the Summary of Test
Borings, and a brief description of the procedures used.
SUBSURFACE AND GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS
The generalized soil stratigraphy is presented below. The stratum symbols and solid lines
which are used to illustrate the various strata break on the Summary of Test Pits are approximate as the
transitions between soil types may occur suddenly or relatively gradual.
Three soil test borings were performed to help determine the foundation design parameters.
The site has a topsoil layer of approximately 1.5 to 2 feet in thickness. The subsurface soils at the site
consist of brown sandy to clayey SILT to depths of approximately 4 to 9 feet. Underlying the brown
slightly clayey SILT. In boring B-2 and B-2 a gravelly layer was encountered at depths of 10 to 16 feet
and transitioned to a gravel, cobble, and boulder material at depths of 17 to 19 feet. At depths of
approximately 17 feet in boring B-1 weathered rock was encountered. No measurable groundwater
was present at the time the soil test borings were completed, or when we revisited on September 12,
1996.
The underlying bedrock is Eagle Valley Evaporite, which contains water soluble sulfates.
The results of the solutioning process are sinkholes, solution cavities and general area subsidence.
There are sinkholes and subsidence areas in the Avon area. There were no sinkholes observed at
the site at the time of the investigation.
5
Indexed to Geological Mapping, Eagle County, Colorado prepared by Charlie S. Robinson
& Associate, INC., in 1975, states that soils in this area may contain mineral in variable amount
that produce serious detrimental effects on concrete, metal or other substances that are in contact
with the soils. Type II cement should be used in all concrete that will be a contact with the soil.
These maps also state that soils in this area may be subject to subsidence due to hydro -
compaction in low density soils.
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION
The project site consists of the construction of a single family residence on the site. The
residence is to be of wood frame construction with concrete slab on grade construction for the ground
floor. We anticipate that the residence will be a two-story structure with a walk out basement.
Foundation wall loading is anticipated to range from 1 to 5 kips per linear foot, and isolated column
loading are anticipated to range from approximately 5 to 25 kips.
FOUNDATION RECONWENDATIONS
Based upon the results of field explorations and the laboratory testing, we recommend that
conventional spread footing foundation system be used. The foundations may be designed for a
bearing pressure of 2000 psf for footings bearing on undisturbed brown sandy to clayey SILT, and
approved fill materials compacted to the recommendations provided herein.
At this pressure, settlements are anticipated to be within tolerable limits for wood frame
construction, provided the improvements in the bearing soils will be made as discussed herein. The
footing excavations should be relatively smooth, free of debris, organics, loose soil, frost, and standing
water. Any over -excavations should be backfilled and compacted to 100 percent within 2 percent of
optimum moisture as determined by a Standard Proctor Test (ASTM D-698). A representative of this
office should be contacted to inspect the foundation excavation to verify that the soil conditions are the
same as those anticipated in this report.
6
After all of the final grading is completed, the bottom of the footings should be covered with a
minimum of 48 inches of backfill for frost protection.
Voids left by the removal of cobbles in the bottom of the footing excavation should be filled
with lean concrete or a granular soil with a maximum particle size of 3 inches compacted to 100
percent of Standard Proctor Density (ASTM D-698), within 2 percent of optimum moisture.
SLAB CONSTRUCTION
The on -site soils, exclusive of Topsoil and Organics are suitable to support lightly loaded slab -
on -grade construction. All excavations made for the foundations under proposed slab -on -grade areas
must be properly backfilled with suitable material compacted to a minimum of 95 percent of the
maximum Standard Proctor Density (ASTM D-698). Backfill placed beneath slab -on -grade floors
should be installed at -1 to +3% of optimum moisture content. The on -site soils, exclusive of topsoil
and organics are suitable for use as backfill. Before the backfill is placed, all water and loose debris
should be removed from the excavations.
Prior to the construction of concrete floors, the undisturbed subgrade, free from topsoil and
organics, should be proof rolled with a loaded rubber -tired loader or similar equipment to densify the
near surface soils. To reduce the chance of damage to shallow utilities, special care should be taken in
areas where underground utilities are present.
The floor slabs should be appropriately reinforced, and joints should be provided at the
junctions of the slab and the foundation walls, so that independent movement can occur without
causing damage. The slabs should be scored in accordance with the American Concrete Institute's
recommendations to help control cracking.
A good alternative, to a concrete slab -on -grade floor with the associated risk of differential
movements causing cracking, is to use structural floor systems with crawl spaces. Seasonal
fluctuations and climatic conditions may cause some vertical movements in floor slabs.
7
GROUNDWATER AND DRAIN SYSTEM
While no groundwater was reported in the soil test borings at the time the field investigation
was conducted, it is possible that seasonal variations will cause fluctuations, or for a water table to be
present in the upper soils during the spring months, or after prolonged periods of rain. A foundation
perimeter drain as detailed on Figure No. 7 is recommended to reduce the risk of surface water
infiltrating the footing subsoils.
REINFORCING
The foundation should be well reinforced and rigid enough to withstand differential
settlements. Walls retaining earth should be designed to resist an equivalent fluid pressure of 35 pcf for
an "active" case assuming a level drained backfill condition. For "at rest" conditions such as basement
walls, an equivalent fluid pressure value of 50 pcf may be used for "at rest" conditions.
CRAWL SPACE COVER
When moist soils are encountered in the excavation, the ground surface in crawl space areas
should be covered with an impervious moisture barrier sealed against the footings. This will help to
reduce humidity in the crawl space area.
BACKFILL AND SURFACE DRAINAGE
The foundation soils encountered in portions of the site must be prevented from being wetted
after construction. The backfill placed around the foundation walls should be methodically compacted
to help reduce settlement after completion of construction. The top one foot of the backfill material
must be relatively impervious. The on -site soils, exclusive of Topsoil and Organics are suitable for use
as backfill.
0
Foundation wall backfill should be moistened or dried to near its optimum moisture content
and compacted to at least 90 percent of the maximum Standard Proctor Density. Structural backfill
should be compacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum dry density as determined by the Standard
Proctor method of test (ASTM D 698).
Surface water running toward the structure from up slope areas should be diverted around and
away from the building by means of lined drainage swales or other similar measures.
The final grade should have a positive slope away from the foundation walls on all sides. A
minimum of 12 inches in the first 10 feet is recommended. Down spouts and sill cocks should
discharge into splash blocks that extend beyond the limits of the backfill or a minimum distance of at
least 5 feet from the foundation wall. The use of long downspout extensions in place of splash blocks
is advisable.
I WWi/►ii���i�
Do not install sprinkler systems next to foundation walls, porches or patio slabs. If sprinkler
systems are installed, the sprinkler heads be aligned so that the spray from the heads, under full
pressure, does not fall on foundation walls or within five feet of foundation walls, porches, or patio
slabs. Lawn irrigation must be controlled and no flooding or ponding of water should be performed.
If the future owners desire to plant next to foundation walls, porches or patio slabs, and are
willing to assume the risk of structural damage, etc., then it is advisable to plant only flowers and
shrubbery (no lawn) of varieties that require very little moisture. These flowers and shrubs should only
be hand watered.
MISCELLANEOUS
The recommendations provided herein are based on experience in the area and from the on -site
field exploration. The information obtained from the field exploration and laboratory testing reflects
subsurface conditions only at the specific locations at the particular times designated. Subsurface
conditions at other locations and times may differ from the conditions at these locations. The extent of
any variations between the test borings may not appear evident until excavation is performed.
However, only minor variations are expected. If during construction conditions appear to be different,
this office should be advised so reevaluation of the recommendations may be made.
This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Richard J. Panter for the specific
application to the proposed residence to be located on Lot 31, Block 6, Lake Creek Subdivision,
Eagle County, Colorado.
The findings and recommendations of this report have been prepared in accordance with locally
accepted professional engineering standards for similar conditions at this time. There is no other
warranty, either expressed or implied.
Sincerely,
INTER -MOUNTAIN ENGINEERING, LTD.
Klcnara V. K1cKs, r
Geotechnical Engineer
S 5#3
LOT JI
6m
LOT 30
LOT 29
APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF SOIL TEST BORES
PROPOSED RESIDENCE n
Lot 31, Lake Creek Meadows
Eagle Coun ty, Colorado
Prepared for. -
,lock Panter PROJECT NO.: 96-O368G
DRAWN BY: ✓. V G.SCALE: ,� 1 = 6o,DATE: 09-25- 96 DRAWING NO.: 1
BORING NO. B-1
DATE DRILLED: 8/30/96
ELEVATION: FIGURE NO.: 1
z
INEPTH
FEEa.
W I
v,=
p
DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL
REMARKS
3
�W
m
Q
011
N
0
[�'11TOPSOIL
JJJJ
SILT, sand, brown
14/12
5
14/12
SILT, clayey, silty, brown
10
15/12
15
20/1
: :
POSSIBLE WEATHERED BEDROCK
20
BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FEET
No Measurable Groundwater
Encountered at Completion.
No groundwater encounted on
9/12/96.
25
30
35
SUMMARY OF TEST BORINGS
nInter-Mountain
PROPOSED RESIDENCE
Engineeringud.
LOT 31, BLOCK 6, LAKE CREEK SUBDIVISION
EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO
PROJECT NO.: 96-0368G
BORING NO. B-2
DATE DRILLED: 8/30/96
ELEVATION: FIGURE NO.: 2
z
wl
IN EFEET PTH
�
N=
-i
DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL
REMARKS
F-
oz
V
m J
N
0
V, V:
JJJ
TOPSOIL
JJJ
SILT, sandy, brown
13/12
5
16/12
GRAVEL and COBBLES,
10
sandstone, brown
24/12
15
20
54/12
t%
GOBBLES
N
BOULDERS
• s
BORING TERMINATED AT 23 FEET
No Measurable Groundwater
25
Encountered at Completion.
No groundwater encountered on
9/12/96.
30
35
SUMMARY OF TEST BORINGS
nInter-Mountain
PROPOSED RESIDENCE
Engineeringud.
LOT 31, BLOCK 6, LAKE CREEK SUBDIVISION
EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO
PROJECT NO.: 96-0368G
BORING NO. B-3
DATE DRILLED: 8/30/96
ELEVATION: FIGURE NO.: 3
z
W I
PTH
IN EFEET
v�=
o
DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL
REMARKS
a.
Q
3
-iw
m
N
MJ
N
0
JJJ
JJJ
TOPSOIL
JJJ
SILT, slighity clayey, brown
13/12
5
13/12
10
17/12
15
!�
GRAVELS and COBBLES, brown
t•�
SILT, sandy, w/sandstone
ravels
37/12
POSSIBLE WEATHERED BEDROCK
20
BORING TERMINATED AT 23 FEET
25
No Measurable Groundwater
encountered at completion
No measurable groundwater on
9/12/96.
30
35
SUMMARY OF TEST BORINGS
nInter-Mountain
PROPOSED RESIDENCE
Engineeringud.
LOT 31, BLOCK 6, LAKE CREEK SUBDIVISION
EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO
PROJECT NO.: 96-0368G
KEY TO SYMBOLS
Symbol Description
Strata symbols
JJJJ
JJJJ
JJJJ
Topsoil
Efl
Silt
Silty low plasticity
clay
Sandstone
Cobbles
Gravel
0w1-1h
Variable gravel
99
and silty sand
mix
Soil Samplers
■ California sampler
Standard penetration test
Notes:
1. Soils test borings were performed on September 30, 1996.
2. Groundwater was not encountered in the at the time the borings were
performed.
3. Soil Test Boring locations-vere paced from existing features.
4. Sampling was performed by driving a 2-inch I.D. California barrel
sampler at the bottom of the boring using a 140 pound sliding hammer
falling 30 inches.
5. These logs are subject to the limitations, conclusions, and
recommendations in this report.
6. Results of tests conducted on samples recovered are furnished in the
Appendix.
_ FIGURE N0. 4
SWELL -CONSOLIDATION TEST REPORT
4
3
2
1
N SWELL
3
V
1�1 0
c
0
— COMPRESSION
In
In
Q)
L 1
a
E
0
U
2
c
:.................................................:
Water
Added
m
U
.............................................
L
N
d
3
4
5
6
0.1 0.5 1 2 5
Applied Pressure - ksf
Swell
Not.
Not.
Dry Dens.
LL
PI
Sp.Gr.
Initial void ratio
press.
Sat.
Moist.
(pcf)
0.25
36.2 %
4.5 %
124.5
2.650
0.3289
TEST RESULTS
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
SILT, sandy, clayey,
Percent swell = 0.1
reddish brown
Project No.: 96-0368G
Remarks:
Project: Lot 31, Block 6, Lake Creek Meadows
Location: Boring No. 9 at 9 feet
Date: 9 16 96
•
nIater Mas=atV&'
En gzrteeririg tea.
Fig. No. 5
F�-
-Top 1 foot of backfill
s: cold be relatively
i=peroious fill.
Slope away from building.
i
• l
Foundation '+dal 1
Granular Fill -•�
Geotexti I e
(?•Urafi 140N or
eq uii-12 .rJ
Polyethelene Moisture XinimLm, of 6" o;
Barrier glued to foundation 3/4 inch gravel
wall '
L" dia=eter perforated rigid
pipe sloped a Mi—M,:a of 118"
per foot to sewer. late: al s:ilt-d~• n,
!UMp pu:p or dayl_ghted.
DETAILS OF PERIPHERAL DRAIN SYS T' 4
FOR FOOTI?IG TYPE FOUNDATION
PROJECT: PROPOSED RESIDENCE
AW
LOT 31, BLOCK 6, LAKE.CREEK SUBDIV.EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO
rtgineerznLt
d. �
,PROJECT NO.: 96-0368G _• FIGURE N0. 7 �
ISDS Permit # I q8'? q9
Date �,
ISDS Final Inspection
j / Completeness Form
r/ Tank is ` � gal. Tank Material %����"
Tank is located b3l, � ft. and A,10 degrees from
(permanent landmark)
Tank is located ft. and degrees from
(permanent landmark)
Tank set level. Tank lids within S" of finished grade.
L, Size of field �3�ft2 C) units lineal ft.
` Technology
Cleanout is installed in between tank and house(+ 1/100ft).
t There is a "T" that goes down 14 inches in ,the inlet and
outlet of the tank.
V Inlet and outlet is sealed with tar tape, rubber gasket etc.
-''Tank has two compartments with the larger compartment closest to the
house.
Measure distance and relative direction to field.
l/, Depth of field :,''`� ( ft.
N fir. Soil interface raked.
Inspection portals at the end of each trench.
Proper distance to setbacks.
Chambers properly installed as per manufacturers specifications.
(Chambers latched, end plates properly installed, rocks removed from
trenches, etc.)
Type of pipe used for building sewer line � leach field
Other 12 5��-�u �tlL 6 k -t t � J,�Ui cuoh-Lld oh.(��� sC1L� l d 6n 3 ' a� ,-,j .
u 0_ lJ
Inspection meets requirements.
Copy form to installer's file if recommendations for improvement were
suggested.
ACTION TAKEN
Setbacks
Well Potable House Property Lake Dry Tank Drain
Water Lines line Stream Gulch
Field 100 25 20 10 50 25 10 10
Tank 50 10 5 10 50. 10 * 10
97 -L(g It Iq 16(Lofe- Cesf- f,I CALCULATED sr DATE
CHECKED BY DATE
SCALE
� -: �;-ms. 5•' /.%IMK !.,c Gfotm Wass 07371 Sff!-&'0-2L,
l
1737-qS ?lo5-lS'2- 03-062 111�lgg
1�87-9�g 2ros-r�z-v.3-viz
cad?eC'�114P�
a-
Q 111caJ m-,�
P�� ��43—
1737-q� 03-002. Its «x
621? C'� 1141 r �
& 474 Cie � �a�
17��-���-
1
1787-98 Tax# 2105-1bZ-UJ-UUL
Lot #31, Block 6 PANTER
JOB NAME Lake Creek Meadows
474 Eagle Crest Rd., Edwards
JOB NO. B P —a N 1
IOB LOCATION
BILL TO
DATE STATE D /
DATE COMPLETED
DATE BILLED
G in
N oS Z%A"
S
jjll' /�fi /1
'fit. vC'�L1i`
�..
s
l�w&r
le
mac-
s
I;
ire '11r
ors tree lv�
{IYr �
>;�/<< �� �z� c 1�� �c fi5
JOB COS 'SUM NigRY
TOTAL SELLING PRICE
�% (A
l
TOTAL MATERIAL
/Z/
7U (t ; `[
TOTAL LABOR
v
INSURANCE
14 Z/
"/,( 4�
SALES TAX
M ISC. COSTS
U 7
TOTAL JOB COST
GROSS PROFIT
LESS OVERHEAD COSTS
% OF SELLING PRICE
NET PROFIT
JOB FOLDER Product 277
JOB FOLDER
Printed in U.SA.
;
i
STANDARD /NR/L TRA TOR CHAMBER
Not To std.
t
{
Cam?UCnAN N01F,S
1. Sewer line from house to septic tank shall have a minimum
slope of two percent.
6.25' 34"
2. Septic tanks shall be installed level The Tanks are to have removable
cover or manholes to. within 8. inches of finish grade. for access. to.
each compartments, for cleaning and inspection. Septic tank to meet
all the requirements of Eagle County Individual Sewage Disposal
Systems, Section 4.07. The tanks are not to be located beneath
designated driveways
10' MIN OFFSET FROM J. Excavate and level 3 feet wide trenches 2.5 feet deep, apart
and 6 feet a ar
PROPERTY LINE
4. Prepare trench bottom and sides in accordance with the state
GROUND SURFACE and local regulations. (For the Infiltrator System, raking
sidewall and bottom infiltrative surfaces is necessary to
6
Oreduce smearing.)
3' 5. Assemble and install the Infiltrator Chambers in the Trenches
1 according to the manufacturers recommendations
TRA TOR CHAMBER (TYP) ALL j
ALL CHAMBERS. ROWS TO BE -----
r 6. Backfi// the side wall area with native soil for proper
INSTALLED LEVEL 1.5' M/N 1 , X support.
3 MA
� 1.
1/ 4" PVC WITH SWEEP 90's or 45's I _ I 7. Backfi// the trenches with a minimum of 12 inches of tamped
soil cover.
4' MIN. TO 8. Avoid vehicle traffic over the system.
,\O BEDROCK or GROUNDWATER
9. All installations shall meet the rules and regulations of
Eagle Coun ty En vironmen ta/ Health Division as se t forth in the
Individual Sewage Disposal System regulations Construction of
the system shall be inspected by the Engineer,
prior to backril/ing.
SERIAL /NFIL TRA TOR INS TALLA TION oEyav fzow
Design Percolation Rate, T 25 minute per inch
SPLASH PLATES TO BE _ _
ALL- _,. —_-.- __ NOTE SEE CONSTRUC170N NOTES FOR (r-1=195 min�nch; T--2=28.2 min/inch,•-T-3=22.5 min/r'nch)
INFILTRATOR INLETS O INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS ( See Genera/ Note 1 ) Use T= 25 minutes per inch
Not To Scale Number of Bedrooms = 4
TOE OF F/LL AREA AS INDICATED BY Maximum daily flow = Qmax
ARCH/TECT PLANS PREPARED FOR JACK AND SHER/ Qmax = 4 brms x 2 persons/brm x 75 gallons
/person/day x 150�
PANTER BY ROD E. NOWON-ARCHITECT A/A Qmax = 900 a/Ions er do
DATED APR/L 21,1998. 9 P y
INFILTRATOR ABSORP77ON FIELD M7nC TANK
/ =
SHALL NOT BE LOCATED BENEATH f7ELV Qmax x 30hrs`
24hrs
V = 900 x JO = 1,125 gallons
p 24
'ff
Wse one 1,250 gallon two compartment concrete septic tank.
NOTE• Install 4" OSI B/OTUBE EFFLUENT FILTER in the outflow of the tank.
We reccommend a FT0444-.36 available , thru SGS Enterprises (303) 670=2.394
ASSWEIZOYV AREA I
0/1-1, ->onay, si croyey, orown v ,
--- -'-- - with gravel and cobbles
1250 GAL. TWO COMPARTMENT
GMMAL N07ES
SEPTIC TANK 1. 'ercolation Test Results_ and Subsurface Soil Conditions obtained by -
ter -Mountain Engineering Ltd.
NOTE• N. rS: -
2. it is recommended that the trenches, be excavated to a minimum
depth of 36 inches. A minimum cover of 2' shall be maintained
!1ts over the top of the infiltrator chambers
Obi Specifications "PLAN
J. The cobbles in the excavation of the leachfield, should not
Dimensions De utilized as bockrill over the infiltrator, chambers
>r FTDae 71 4. Residence layout provided to Inter -Mountain Engineering Ltd.
te
..�•: A Namdoumcsr
Eandihle PVC Mandl. 1 Vaue ttrye y - - - I=10'PVC Cap - - C tmetm"te 2• - - - - - - Denotes Percolation Test Pit Approximate Location _
no.n..n Air Yente - D tm.nnxaet HegM Is' _
IP
g ` rk.&M'r - Denotes 'Approximate Location of Soil Profile Test Pit
Soling Ring - Gatem svnarMa0la Cal ter ats'¢tancr, - - - - - - - -
NOTE• IF DURING CONSTRUCTION OF THE LEACHFIELD, SOLID OR
FRAGMENTED BEDROCK IS ENCOUNTERED, THE ENGINEER SHOULD BE
vridi� R"' a�eMTv HA CONTACTED IMMEDIA TEL Y FOR ADD/77ONAL RECOMMENDA PONS.
0sl Tr
Biotube" }.' ..
Effluent AGCM
Filter SECTION
�-sen.mw.l+ Sul fl
PVC Toe-
-
r ���� RE
p f
6 I fi p �r • '• /
inx "out"
cT
1000 11111117 Diameter
AL
• � !//dl11111t1U�
DIMENSIONS
ICAP/4ES
A
I B
APPROX/MATE WE/GNTS
W
I L
I H
TANK/
A
AL
r 11r
rr—w
r—Al
4W
4 D
1 9= (BS
I M;V I
law LW
IJ7AD
DESIGNED BY-
R.R.
R.R.
DRAIHV BY
D.F.
(71ECKED BY
R. R.
DATE ISWED.
04
06 98
- i
i
i maicT Na
98-0048E
SHEET NO.
1 OF 1
I
