HomeMy WebLinkAbout701 Red Canyon Creek Rd - 194125102008 - 1774-98ISINDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PERMIT
EAGLE COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION
P.O. Box 179 - 500 Broadway • Eagle, CO 81631
Telephone: (970) 328-8755
COPY OF PERMIT MUST BE POSTED AT INSTALLATION SITE. PERMIT NO. 1774-98 BP NO. 12010
OWNER: GARY & LIENE GAUGER PHONE: 970-926-2024
MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 463, EDWARDS, CO 81632
APPLICANT: SAME PHONE:
SYSTEM LOCATION: LOT# 6. RED CANYON ESTATES, WOLCOTT, CO TAX PARCEL NO. 1941-251-02-008
LICENSED INSTALLER: EDWARDS EXCAVATING, DON JOHNSON LICENSE NO. 35-98 PHONE: 970-926-3395
DESIGN ENGINEER: LKP ENGINEERING, LUIZA PETROVSKA PHONE NO. 970-827-9098
INSTALLATION HEREBY GRANTED FOR THE FOLLOWING:
1500 GALLON SEPTIC TANK 1500 SQUARE FEET OF ABSORPTION AREA VIA 48 INFILTRATOR UNITS AS PER DESIGN.
SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS: INSTALL AS PER ENGINEER'S DESIGN DATED 3/6/98. ENGINEER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR FINAL INSPECTION
BUILDING CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL NOT BE ISSUED WITHOUT SEPTIC SYSTEM APPROVAL
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH APPROVAL: DATE: JUNE 17, 1998
CONDITIONS:
1. ALL INSTALLATIONS MUST COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE /AGLE COUNTY INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM REGULATIONS,
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GRANTED IN 25-10-104, 1973, AS AMENDED.
2. THIS PERMIT IS VALID ONLY FOR CONNECTION TO STRUCTURES WHICH HAVE FULLY COMPLIED WITH COUNTY ZONING AND BUILDING
REQUIREMENTS, CONNECTION TO OR USE WITH ANY DWELLING OR STRUCTURE NOT APPROVED BY THE ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENTS
SHALL AUTOMATICALLY BE A VIOLATION OF A REQUIREMENT OF THE PERMIT BOTH LEGAL ACTION AND REVOCATION OF THE PERMIT.
3. CHAPTER N, SECTION 4.03.29 REQUIRES ANY PERSON WHO CONSTRUCTS, ALTERS OR INSTALLS AN INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM TO
BE LICENSED.
FINAL APPROVAL OF SYSTEM (TO BE COMPLETED BY INSPECTOR):
NO SYSTEM SHALL BE DEEMED TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE EAGLE COONTY INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM REGULATIONS UNTIL
THE SYSTEM IS APPROVED PRIOR TO COVERING ANY PORTION OF THE SYSTEM.
INSTALLED ABSORPTION OR DISPERSAL AREA: 1488 SQUARE FEET (VIA _48 INFILTRATOR UNITS )
INSTALLED CONCRETE TANK: 1500GALLONS IS LOCATED _ DEGREES AND 10 FEET FROM THE SE CORNER
OF THE RESIDENCE.
COMMENTS: EN TNF.FR FTNAL TNSPECTTON DONE BY KOF.CT4LETN FNGTNE RTN( FTNAT APPROVAT
RECEIVED 11-12-98.
ANY ITEM NOT MEETING REQUIREMENTS WILL BE CORRECTED BEFORE FINAL APPROVAL OF SYSTEM IS MADE. ARRANGE A RE -INSPECTION WHEN
WORK IS COMPLETED. -
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH APPROVAL iI7• G�/N�% �l/Y DATE:
Inuomplete'Applications Will NOT Be Accepted
(Site Plan MUST be attached)
ISDS Permit # I TW- 1
Building Permit # /D
APPLICATION FOR INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PERMIT
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH OFFICE.- EAGLE COUNTY
P. O. BOX 179
t*A
E, CO 81631
3282 3823 (Basalt)
* PERMIT APPLICATION FEE $. PERCOLATION TEST FEE $200.00�
* MAKE ALL REMITT CE TO: "EAGLE COUNTY TREASURER"
PROPERTY OWNER: U',4,oe v ;e*d 6 �f e
MAILING ADDRESS: Ae> D �t �710lS(llG�ic PHONE: 9-71 ii"y
APPLICANT/ CONTACT PERSON: _ /9 �Jdega G PHONE : ? ? � d
LICENSED SYSTEMS CONTRACTOR: PHONE•
COMPANY/DBA: ADDRESS:
***************************************************************************
PERMIT APPLICATION IS FOR: LD-j NEW INSTALLATION ( ) ALTERATION ( ) REPAIR
LOCATION OF PROPOSED INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE
%DISPOSAL SYSTEM:
Legal Description:
Tax Parcel Number: %�'' l o�i� Lot Size:
Physical Address:. C7
BUILDING TYPE: (Check applicable category)
Residential/Single Family Number of Bedrooms -s�-
( ) Residential/Multi-Family* Number of Bedrooms
( ) Commercial/Industrial* Type
TYPE OF WATER SUPPLY: (Check applicable category)
Well ( ) Spring ( ) Surface
( ) Public Name of Supplier:
*These systems require Aesign by a Registered Professional Engi eer
SIGNATURE: Date:
AMOUNT PAID: D RECEIPT #: D % DATE: 1� j
CHECK #: 3 CASHIER: lG
Community Development Department
(970) 328-8730
FAX (970) 328-7185
TDD (970) 328-8797
Email: eccmdeva@vail.net
http: //www.eagle-county.com
EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO
November 13, 1998
Gary and Ilene Gauger
P.O. Box 463
Edwards, CO 81632
Eagle County Building
P.O. Box 179
500 Broadway
Eagle, Colorado 81631-0179
RE: Final of ISDS Permit #1774-98, Tax Parcel #1941-251-02-008. Property location: 701
Red Canyon Rd., Edwards, CO.
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Gauger:
This letter is to inform you that the above referenced ISDS Permit has been inspected and
finalized. Enclosed is a copy to retain for your records. This permit does not indicate
compliance with any other Eagle County requirements. Also enclosed is a brochure regarding
the care of your septic system.
Be aware that later changes to your building may require appropriate alterations of your septic
system.
If you have any questions regarding this permit, please contact the Eagle County Environmental
Health Division at (970) 328-8755.
Sincerely,
jouzv
Janet Kohl
Environmental Health Department
Eagle County Community Development
ENCL:Infonnational Brochure
Final ISDS Permit
cc: files
Community Development Department
(970) 328-8730
Fax: (970) 328-7185
TDD: (970) 328-8797
EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO
Date: June 16, 1998
TO: Edwards Excavating
Eagle County Building
P.O. Box 179
500 Broadway
Eagle, Colorado 81631-0179
FROM: Environmental Health Division
RE: Issuance of Individual Sewage Disposal System Permit No. 1774-98. Tax Parcel
# 1941-251-02-008. Property Location: Lot 46, Red Canyon Estates, Edwards,
CO., Gauger residence.
Enclosed is your ISDS Permit No. 1774-98. It is valid for 120 days. The enclosed copy of the
permit must be posted at the installation site. Any changes in plans or specifications
invalidates the permit unless otherwise approved.
Systems designed by a Registered Professional Engineer must be certified by the Engineer
indicating that the system was installed as specified. Eagle County does not perform final
inspections on engineer designed systems. Your TCO will not be issued until our office
receives this certification.
Permit specifications are minimum requirements only, and should be brought to the property
owner's attention.
This permit does not indicate conformance with other Eagle County requirements.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact the Environmental Health Division at 328-
8755.
cc: files
LKP Engineering, Luiza Petrovska
Received Nov-12-98 02:44pm
from CCITT G3 - ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH page 2
November 12, 1998
Koechlein Consulting Engineers, Inc.
Consulting Geotechnici En
g veers
12364 W. Alarm eda Pkwy * Suite 135 • Lakewood, CO 80228-2845
1A K FW �� ,fit Y 1'M !-NE
(333) 989-1�23 (970) 949-6009 (970) 468-6933
(303) 989•0204 Pax (970) 949-9223 Fax (970) 468-6939 Fax
'Mr. Gary Gauger
clo Vail Electronics
P.O. Box 460
Mintum, CO 81645-0460
Subject; Septic System Inspection tot the Proposed Residence
Lot 6
Red Canyon Estates
Eagle County,, Colorado
Job No. 98-177
As requested by Eagle County, we h�ve reviewed our letter dated September 4, 1998 mid our field
irispeddon report dated August. 20, 190. Alter reviewing our letter and our field inspection report, we
have oompleted and have enclosed the proper ISDS Final Inspection Completeness Form.
We appreciate the opportunity to prop icie this servic o. If we can be of further service,. please contact us.
Sincerely, i
KOECKEIN CONSULTING ENGY ERS, JNC.
• i
SCott E. Myers I
`.Engineer
(I copy sent) ,..
cc: Eagle County
enclosure
Koechlein Consulting Engineers
Consulting Geotechnical Engineers
12364 W. Alameda Pkwy • Suite 135 • Lakewood, CO 80228
MAIN OFFICE
(303) 989-1223
(303) 989-0204 FAX
September 4, 1998
Mr. Gary Gauger
c/o Vail Electronics
P.O. Box 460
Minturn, CO 81645-0460
AVON
(970) 949-6009
(970) 949-9223 FAX
Subject: Septic System Inspection for the Proposed Residence
Lot 6
Red Canyon Estates
Eagle County, Colorado
Job No. 98-177
SILVERTHORNE
(970) 468-6933
(970) 468-6939 FAX
As requested, a representative from our office inspected the septic system at the subject site on August
20, 1998. The purpose of our inspection was to verify that the septic system was installed as per the
project plans.
The top of the septic system was approximately 2.5 feet below the ground surface. The soils exposed in
the base of the septic system excavation consisted of a moist, dense, clayey silt and gravel with some
cobbles. The septic system consisted of a septic tank attached to 30 inch diameter infiltrators in multiple
rows to the south of the existing residence. Based on our observations, the septic system was installed as
per project plans.
We appreciate the opportunity to provide this service. If we can be of further service, please contact us.
Sincerely,
TING ENGINEERS, INC.
15962 BEI
" -
P.E. �i Ikx .a di1�C
�lrirsr�uun�aro��
9661 T T d33
(1 copy sent)
cc: Eagle County
Michael G. Perkin
Gray -Stone Construction, Inc.
�-EnL U?;LNVYKUNMENTRL HERLTH oct-es-99 e3:59pm
from 328e349-)
page 2/ 2
S60 /1/r s
503 �9Da-oy
ISDS Permit #_ Date 8 30 8
xSDB �i na2 �nsrs�ection
S�mpleteness F�'orm
/Tank is do gai. Tank Material yam--C,
✓ Tank is located /0* 'ft. and __degrees from SE the p o& ce�ic�aan .
(pttt-,&Aent Ydnda%drk)
Tank :is located ft. and _-_,degrees frern
/ (POM&-Scc YandcwrkS
✓ '_^ank set level. ✓ TaLrnk lids B" of finished grade.
Size of field Q400 ft y8 units lineal ft.
/ `�ec�hzology fAtrJ11ftjjM <IbW� @, (s0 (tMAJ 4
✓ cleanout is installed in between tank and house(+ 1%100ft)
There is a 'IT" that goes down 14 .inches In the inlet and
outlet of the tank.
✓ Inlet and outlet is sealed with tat tape, rubber gaske(- etc_
Tank has two compartments with the larger compartment to the
hai;Se
Measure distance and relative direction to field, 05# S. or. M.*itk tA,
?depth of field N ft.
Soil interface raked_
Inspection portals at the end of each trerxh,
✓ Prope, distance to setbacks.
✓ chambers properly installed as per manufacturers specifications.
(Chambers hatched, end plates properly installed, rocks removed from
/'trenches, etc.)
✓___ Type of pipe used for building sewer lire ,�� lt:ach field
Other
✓ Inspection meets r, eg2iramnnh -
Copy focus to installer -to file if recommendations for improvement were
suggested.
ACTION `ZAYEN :
Setbacks
Well Potable house Property Lake Dry Tank Drain
War binu I ine Stream u ,y.h
Field io0 2S 20 10 So 25 10 10
Tazk 50 10 5 10 50 10 * 10
Koechlein Consulting Engineers, Inc.
Consulting Geotechnical Eng
ineers
12364 W. Alameda Pkwy • Suite 135 • Lakewood, CO 80228-2845
LAKEWOOD AVON SILVERTHORNE
(303) 989-1223 (970) 949-6009 (970) 468-6933
(303) 989-0204 Fax (970) 949-9223 Fax (970) 468-6939 Fax
November 12, 1998
Mr. Gary Gauger
c/o Vail Electronics
P.O. Box 460
Minturn, CO 81645-0460
Subject: Septic System Inspection for the Proposed Residence
Lot 6
Red Canyon Estates
Eagle County, Colorado
Job No. 98-117
As requested by Eagle County, we have reviewed our letter dated September 4, 1998 and our field
inspection report dated August 20, 1998. After reviewing our letter and our field inspection report, we
have completed and have enclosed the proper ISDS Final Inspection Completeness Form.
We appreciate the opportunity to provide this service. If we can, be of further service,. please contact us.
Sincerely,
KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC
Scott B. Myers
Engineer
(1 copy sent)
cc: Eagle County.
enclosure
RECEIVED
NOV 2 0 1998
EAGLE COUNFY
CL/MMUNR y FVERLOPMENT
Received Nov-12-98 02:44pm from CCITT G3 - ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH page 3
o _ • 5rn1 by1eMUiReNMENTRL MR01.7I! 0et-06w 9 8315i'm from sxypsma •age $r
J60 7 /firf
a3,°r9t��cl�
xSDs Permit ��
✓ i Da ta_q�
Tank is ga„ Task l�m�ariatZ �+
Tank is lafiatad %e ft , an4 �dagregg
let:arvtaM ir+adfi►sk�
Tank is 1004t4d __. ft. ,_ �d•grw3es from
,r � �A�nNMIIC 1�+1Anarkf '
Tank set level. ✓ �as:x� lids within a" Of finished
We,t3_ade .
., Size of rield -Aoo ft) ' a units ,�
'�=1=0logy ;� a naxal £t .
4' r.w% �= 60 /i4Kri 1C14
clwarlo%tt is installed In ib etweserl tank and house (+ T% loo)ft).
ThRree zs ar "T" that goes 6oum 1.1 i.rchee in the inlet and
outlet of the tank.
Tnl0t and outlet ie sealed with tar taps, rUbll er gasket; etc.
Tank has two compartmaentsi with the !&Vjer• compartment czlasast to the
.house.
Measure distance and relative direction to field. %a S. e4
DaN:th of field l;t.
Soil irttOrfaae raked,
Tnepection portals .at thesend of each trench.
Vol,, Proper discar:cee co xe3cbac .! ,%.
Chambers properly installe;4 as per manufacturers spacleicatioza.
(Char�erS latchad, Bred plates properly installed, rocks removed from
trenches, etc. ) ;
— --Type of pipe used for blila. ing Sewer Iare�leach field
. _...,.. othte:r
I"p+ection Meeto r2gUIXIMAi Z2.
..�_ Cepy form t:a �,nitel,lerra film if rdtac eandations for improvemeat were
a'uggFested.
,AC710M TAKSM
Setbacks
Well Potable House Property' Lake 0 Tank Drain
ZL11A 100 25 20 10 so 25 10 IO
zaak 5a 10 5 to so IQ 10
LKP Enginee�r�ing, Inc.
SOIL! ND FOUNDATION WVESTIGAT'{ON
FOR
PROPOSED RESILIENCE
LOT G, RED CANYON ESTATES
:LAGLE COUNTY, COLOTLkDO
PROJECT NO. 1,819
MARCH G, V)Si8
6 `f'wl*,Ih Illlt 6111111 y /
PREPARED FOR:
GARS' & :EILEEN GAUGER
P.O. BOX 462,
EDWARDS, CO 81632
Iqp .1-
,+? ►�����
paL,iZ.P 6Qjjq A da d
3lt,1gy
P.O. Bo::14`i2, Ac!on, Colo-,i,io 8 6'0 . (9?0) 82 5088 i i 0 (970) 82?-9089 Pax
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................. 2
SCOPE OF STUDY ........................................................ 2
SITE DESCRIPTION ... .................. 2
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION .......................... I .................... 3
FIELD INVESTDsATION................................................... 3
SUBSURFACE SOIL AND GROUNDWATER CONDITION ........................ 3
FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATIONS ....................................... 4
SLAB CONSTRUCTION.................................................... 5
RETAINING WALLS ........................................ ......... .. 5
UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM ................................... I ................ 6
SITE GRADING AND DRAINAGE ............................................ 6
LAWN IRRIGATION ....................................................... 7
LEVIITATION............................................................. 7
FIGURES
LOCATION SKETCH ..........................................DRAWING NO. 1
SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION LOGS ........ . ................. FIGURE NO's 1-2
GRAIN -SIZE DISTRIBUTION ................ ................. FIGURE NO's 3-4
PERIIVIETER DRAIN ...........................................FIGURE NO. 5
WALL DRAIN ................................................ FIGURE NO. 6
LKP Engineering, Inc.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1. The proposed residence should be supported with
conventional type spread footings, designed for an
allowable soil bearing pressure of 1500 psf: They should
construct the footings on the undisturbed silty to
gravelly Sand. See Foundation Recommendations.
SCOPE OF STUDY
This report presents the results of a subsurface Soil and Foundation Investigation for a
proposed residence to be constructed on Lot 6, Red Canyon Estates, Eagle County, Colorado.
The purpose of the subsurface soil and foundation investigation was to determine the engineering
characteristics of the foundation soil and to provide recommendations for the foundation design,
grading, and drainage.
SITE DESCRIPTION
Lot 6 is a 35.150-acre lot, in the Red Canyon Estates on the north side of Interstate 70,
off Colorado Highway 6, west of Edwards, Eagle County, Colorado. The proposed building site
is on the west side of the access road, about 200 feet south from Lot 7. Part of the proposed
building will be located on the steep hillside to the west, and part on the flatter slope at the base
of the hill. Also, the building site is at the base of a drainage gulch. South from the building site is
LKP Engineering, Inc.
z
a pond. Vegetation on the lot consisted of grass on the flatter slope and sagebrush and brush
with some rock outcropping on the steep slope. Drainage is to the east from the hillside, and to
the south at the base. Lot 6 is vacant. Based on the topo map, an old wood building was just
north of the proposed building site, but it was demolished. Four to six inches of snow covered the
site.
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION
We assume that the proposed residence will consist of two stories, wood frame
construction, with a concrete foundation. We anticipate loads to be light, typical of residential
construction.
If the finalized plans differ significantly from the above understanding, they should notify
us to reevaluate the recommendations of this report.
FIELD INVESTIGATION
The field ir...vestigation conducted on February 27, 1998, consisted of excavating, logging
and sampling two test pits. The test pits' locations are shown on Drawing No. 1. The excavation
of the test pits was done with a conventional, rubber tired, backhoe. We show the soil profile of
the test pits on the Subsurface Exploration Logs, Figure No's 1 and 2. Soil samples for laboratory
soil analysis and observation were taken at selected intervals.
SUBSURFACE SOIL AND GROUNDWATER CONDITION
The soil profiles encountered in the two test pits were fairly L niform. Both test pits had no
topsoil. Test Pit No.l had 12 :;,,et of reddish -brown, sil :y-gravelly sand with some angular
cobbles. At the bottom of the test pit were cobble to boulder size rocks. Test Pit No.2 had 7.5
feet of darker reddish *brown, silty -gravelly sand. Ground water was aot encountered in either test
LKP Engineering, Inc.
pit.
We sampled the soil in the test pits at random Lriten; als. The soil samples were tested in
our laboratory for natural moisture content and grain -size distribution. The test results are shown
on Figure No's 3 and 4.
Review of the Indexes to Geological Mapping, Eagle County, Colorado, prepared by Mr.
Charles S. Robinson & Associates, Inc., in 1975, shows that the underlying bedrock is Maroon
Formation.
FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATIONS
The proposed residence should be supported with conventional type spread footings,
designed for a maximum allowable soil bearing pressure of 1500 psf. The footings should be
placed on the undisturbed silty -gravelly sand. We recommend minimum width of 16 inches for the
continuous footings and 2 feet for the isolated footing pads. Continuous foundation walls should
be reinforced top and bottom to span an unsupported length of at least 10 feet.
We recommend a minimum of 48 inches of backfill cover for frost protection of the
footing subsoils. the foundation excavation should be observed by the undersigned engineer to
verify that the soil conditions encountered during construction are as anticipated in this report.
The foundation excavation should be free from excavation spoils, frost, organics and standing
water. We recommend prooy=rolling of the foundation excavation. Soft spots detected during
the proof -rolling, should be removed by overexcavation. Any overexcavation within the proposed
foundation, should be backfilled, in 8 inches loose leve lifts and compacted to 100% of the
maximum dry density and within 2 percent of the optimum moisture content as determined in a
laboratory from a Standard Proctor test (ASTM D-698). A structural fill, placed under footings
should be tested by the engineer or her representatives on regular basis.
L.K.P Engineering, Inc.
R
SLAB CONSTRUCTION
The natural on -site soils, exclusive of topsoil and organics, are suitable to support lightly
loaded slab -on -grade construction. The subgrade for the slab -on -grade construction should be
proof compacted to detect and remove soft spots. They should backfill overexcavated soft spots
and other underslab fill with the on -site soil, free from topsoil and organics, or other suitable
material, compacted to a minimum of 95 percent of the maximum standard Proctor density
(ASTM D-698). Suitable material should be free from topsoil, organics and rock fragments
greater than 3 inches.
The concrete slab should be constructed over a 4-inch layer of clean gravel consisting of -
3/4 inch gravel with at least 50% retained on the No. 4 sieve and less than 3 percent passing the
No. 200 sieve.
They should reinforce the concrete slab -on -grade and score control joints according to the
American Concrete Institute requirements and per the recommendations of the designer to reduce
damage due to shrinkage. The concrete slab should be separated from the foundation walls and
columns with expansion joints to allow for independent movement without causing damage.
RETAL'UNG WALLS
Foundation walls retaining earth and retaining structures that are laterally supported
should be designed to resist an equivalent fluid density of 60 pcf for an "at -rest" condition.
Laterally unrestrained structures, retaining the on -site earth, should be designed to resist an
equivalent fluid density of 40 pcf for the "active" case.
The above design recommendations assume drained backfill conditions and a horizontal
backfill surface. Surcharge loading due to adjacent structures, weight of temporary stored
construction materials and equipment, inclined backfill and hydrostatic pressure due to undrained
backfill should be incorporated in the design. They should try to prevent the buildup of
hydrostatic pressure behind the retaining wall.
LKP Engineering, Inc.
r"
UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM
To reduce the risk of surface water infiltrating the foundation subsoil, we recommend
installation of a foundation perimeter drain (see Figure No. 5). The foundation perimeter drain
should consist of a 4-inch diameter, perforated pipe, sloped to a suitable gravity outlet, or to a
sump pump location, at a 1/4 inch per foot for flexible or at a 1/8 of an inch for rigid pipe. The
drain pipe should be covered with a minimum of 6 inches of -3/4-inch free -draining granular
material. Geotextile (Miraf. laON or equivalent) should: be used to cover the free -draining gravel
to prevent siltation and clogging of the drain. The backfill above the drain should be granular
material to within 2 feet of the ground surface to prevent a buildup of hydrostatic pressure.
In addition to the underdrain system described above, a Miradrain or a walldrain system
should be constructed on the west foundation wall, against the steep hillside. A drainage swale
should also be constructed to collect and divert surface runoff away from the foundation soils.
SITE GRADING AND DRAINAGE
Exterior backfill should be compacted at or near the optimum moisture content to at least
95% of the maximum standard Proctor density under pavement, sidewalk and patio areas and to
at least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density -:.ender landscaped areas. They should use
mechanical methods of compaction. Do not puddle the foundation excavation.
The site surrounding the building structure should slope away from the building in all
directions. A minimum of 12 inches in the first 10 feet is recommended in unpaved areas, and
three inches in the first 10 feet in paved areas. The top of the granular foundation backfill should
be covered with a minimum of 1 foot of relatively impervious fill to reduce the potential of
surface water infiltrating the foundation subsoils.
Surface water naturally draining toward the proposed building site should be diverted
around and cmay from it by means o f di aincrge swales or other approved methods. The roof
LKP Engineering, Inc.
VA
drains and downspouts should extend and discharge beyond the limits of the backfill.
LAWN IRRIGATION
It is not recommended to introduce excess water to the foundation soils by installing
sprinkler systems next to the building. The installation of the sprinkler heads should insure that
the spray from the heads will not fall within 10 feet of foundation walls, porches or patio slabs.
Lawn irrigation must be controlled.
LIMITATION
This report has been prepared according to locally accepted Professional Geotechnical
Engineering standards for similar methods of testing and soil conditions at this time. There is no
other warranty either expressed or implied.
The findings and recommendations of this report are based on field exploration, laboratory
testing of samples obtained at the specific locations shown on the Location Sketch, Drawing No. l
and on assumptions stated in the report. Soil conditions at other locations may vary, which may
not become evident until the foundation excavation is completed. If soil or water conditions seem
different from those described in this report we should be contacted immediately to reevaluate the
recommendations of this report.
This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Gary & Eileen Gauger, for the
specific application to the proposed residence on Lot 6, Red Canyon Estates, Eagle County,
Colorado.
Sincerely, ` ,.`'�
LKP ENGINEERING, °vErN°
°
29526
Luiza Petrovska PE
President
CAOFFICE\W P WMWPDOCS\98:. 9SND.RPT
LKP Engineerin;;, Inc.
-120
-110
Pit
/
�
\ |
�
�
}
�
|
, |
- 7--\v
25
- Y (
--------- -- -- --�� !
«»� !
N0TF.- TEST F,rS L0CARY) Rv pn(,wc ~~~~ |
TEST PIT NO. :1
DATE EXCAVATED: February 27, 1998
ELEVATION:
S
Y DEPTH M q DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL LABORATORY
FEET s AND SAMPLE LOCATION TEST RESULTS
- o
L
Reddish brown silty
- gravelly sand with
occasional angular cobbles
-5
MC=3.3 %
200=7.7%
-- Io
Refusal C 12' on rocks
® = Relatively undisturbed hand drive
N = Bulk sample
DD = Natural Dry Density
MC = Natural Moisture Content
-200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve
LL = Liquid Limit
PI = Plasticity Index
No ground water
encountered
REMARKS
PROJECT NO. g 819
LKP ENGINEERING, INC. SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION LOG
FIGURE NO. 1
TEST PIT NO. 2
DATE EXCAVATED: February 27, 1998
ELEVATION:
s
Y A DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL LABORATORY
DEPTH M
FEET s AND SAMPLE LOCATION TEST RESULTS
0
L
Dark reddish brown
gravelly sand
Bottom of Test Pit
--10
----- 15
----- 20
O = Relatively undisturbed hand drive
® = Bulk sample
DD = Natural Dry Density
MC = Natural Moisture Content
-200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve
LL = Liquid Limit
PI = Plasticity Index
MC=6.7/
-200=4.1%
No ground water
encountered
REMARKS
2.5' of frost
PROJECT NO. 9 819
LICP ENGINEERING, INC. SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION LOG
FIGURE NO. 2
r-i
4
w o
Ce
E _
0
E
C
C
C\
C
C
C
r
N C
u
w
CO C
E <
z C
c
w :=. C
w_ c
N t
O '
Q
C]
Z
Fa- C
fn
N t
= s
f
N C,
W
S
U
Z
.. c
z
C�
z
z
w
a
O
W
w
N
Q
O
Z
Q
F-
N
N
Percent Coarser by Weight
0
C) o C, C) o C> C, C� o 0
O 1-4 N m d' N iD r— - CO O1 .1
S8
b44
O CJ C C7 O O C'> O CO O C)
U fT 00 h 10 N ct m N •-'�
.Y
Percent H ur by Weight
Project No. 98
Figure No. 3
U,
r;
N
}� LU
w
a o
+.
cn =
0
Ei
to
Q:
w
CO
z
w
w
VI
C] '
Q
O
Z
Q
V)
N
to
w
I =
V
.Zi
Z
Z
Percent Coarser by Weight
0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O
O rl N M ct 00
■.
�0
vO
--
n
N
E
E
•r
C
E
•r
L
C7
O
C0 (d
V
V) U)
ri
�
i
N
C
ai
S4
S. It
a
�
d
ro
>
O
rt)
U
L
C7
e
C) UJ o O O O O C O O
C) 00 D tf) •7 M N •-
Percent Finr!r by Weight
LRP EIGINEER.ING, INC. GRAIN SIZE DISTRIF�ITION ANAI,`�'SI Project No.��
9 819
_�._...,..
Figure No-4
SL 0 A WA Y FROAf BUILDING
d
D p / COINER BACKFILL WITH ONE
D D FOOT OF REL A TI VEL Y
IMPERVIOUS SOIL
p
D Z GRANULAR FILL
d D
d D d C>
D D E ,� FILTER FABRIC
. d (MIRAFI 140N OR
EOUIVALENT)
d
D D . FOOT/NG D
^ oo O ��o
° o o;/
D p D P DD p O O O /
p � \
IMPERVIOUS MOISTURE —I
BARRIER CL UED TO THE
FOUNDATION MIALL
GRA VEL THICk'NESS SHOUL D BE
.A T LEAST B INCHES AND SHOJLD
INCREASE IF HE4 OER SEEPAc:E iS
AIV TI[,!F A TED
CIVIL./GE0'IY:CIINICA1,
�1SP Engineering, Inc.
P.0 Box. 1452 Avon, CO 81620
tel (970; 827-9088 fax (970) 827-9089
COA,4SE- GRA VEL, J14 INCH DIAIV
WIT-,' LESS THAN 5l FINES
i
4-INCH DIAMETER PERFORATED
PIPE SLOPED TO A SUITABLE OUTLET
AT 114 PER FOOT FOR FLEkIBLE AND
A T 11,5 " PL R FOOT FOR RICID PIPE
PERIMETER DRAIN
t OT C, FED CAwop ESTATES
EAGLE COUNTY; Ct>LORADO
PREPARED F. )R.
GA,A Y rC FIT.FFnr rA rrrPD
PROJECT NO.:
981:?
SCALf: ----._..
N T.S
DA rE:
FIGURE WO—..—
-
�) INALE
FL OOR
SYSTEM
6' MIN. COVER
D ° Dn
lit
° D l4IA TERPROOFING
D
e
D ° l
o D c
e c
nc c
Dc MIRADRAIN 6000
° —
e J.
J
o \ D
A S D
D O
° Q o D
Z GRANULAR FILLI&I
COARSE GRA VEL, 3/4 INVI9TH LESS THAN 5Z FINEBASEMENT e o ° DCONCRETESLABDFOO TING
e
e D o c
FABRIC OVERLAP
IMPEL? l iOUS AGO/S ; URE — 4—INC V DIAMETER PERFORA TED
BARRIER GLUED TO THE PIPE SLOPED TO A DAYLIGHT LOCAT/_
FOUNDATION W4L- AT 1/4" PER FOOT FOR FLEXIBLE AND
A T 1/3" PER FOOT FOR RIGID PIPE
I ALl, & PERIMETER DRAIN C",,
CIVI,./GBOTE('IINICAL c SCALE: —
LC 1 ri, F'._D CANY `N ESTATES /V r
�I1TP Engineering, Inc. EACLE COUNTY; COLORADO DATE. _ ---
t'REPARED : -OR: OJ-- Ob
,7.0.) pox 903 a : ,n, 7 l3 27 GAR]` & EILEF N GAUGER FIGURE NO.:
tel (970) 827-9088 fax (970) 827-9089
1774-98 Tax# 1941-251-02-008
Lot #6, Red Canyon Estates GAUGER
JOB NAME
JOB NO.�� 6/b
LOCATION
BILL IO-
DATE STAR ED
,51
DATE COMPLETED
DATE BILLED
-�'(/i ✓�
(/�
(J (/ "� Nam" l iol -h& U wze
is _
r3
q� i 12
�-
fincQ ; f- s
JOB COST SUMMARY
TOTAL SELLING PRICE
3 f
TOTAL MATERIAL
TOTAL LABOR
INSURANCE
SALES TAX
MISC. COSTS
TOTAL JOB COST
GROSS PROFIT
LESS OVERHEAD COSTS
% OF SELLING PRICE
NET PROFIT
JOB FOLDER Product 278 JOB FOLDER Printed in U.SA
