No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1055 Beard Creek Rd - 194332306001INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PERMIT EAGLE COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION P.O. Box 179 - 500 Broadway - Eagle, Colorado 81631 Telephone: 328-8755 YELLOW COPY OF PERMIT MUST BE POSTED AT INSTALLATION SITE. Please call for final inspection before covering any portion of installed system. tj I 3 PERMIT NO. 1556 OWNER: Robert L. & Gail E. Newman PHONE: (97R) 926-3155 MAILINGADDRESS: P.O. BOX 32 city: Avon State: CO Zip: 81620 APPLICANT: Gail Newman PHONE: 4970) 94q-1959 SYSTEM LOCATION: 1055 Beard Creek Rd., Edwards TAX PARCEL NUMBER: 1943-'j23-017-OO7 LICENSED INSTALLER:_ S= i aapl ('onitri-jOton, Cbri s Sni PgPI LICENSENO: '39-96 DESIGN ENGINEER OF SYSTEM: INSTALLATION HEREBY GRANTED FOR THE FOLLOWING: 750 GALLON SEPTIC TANK ABSORPTION AREA REQUIREMENTS: SQUARE FEET OF SEEPAGE BED 493 SQUARE FEET OF TRENCH BOTTOM. via 14 infiltrator units as requested. SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS: Install in Serial distribution in trenrb configuration- Install insnPctinn x portalls in each trench, and a cleanout between the tank and the house- Rake trench s,d1P walls to prevent smearing Call the County for final inspection prior to back -filling, and you have questions reg rd' ion. g ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH APPROVAL: DATE: CONDITIONS: 1. ALL INSTALLATIONS MUST COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE EAGLE COUNTY INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM REGULATIONS, ADOPTED PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GRANTED IN 25- 10. 104. 1973, AS AMENDED. 2. THIS PERMIT IS VALID ONLY FOR CONNECTION TO STRUCTURES WHICH HAVE FULLY COMPLIED WITH COUNTY ZONING AND BUILDING REQUIREMENTS. CONNECTION TO OR USE WITH ANY DWELLING OR STRUCTURE NOT APPROVED BY THE ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENTS SHALL AUTOMATICALLY BE A VIOLATION OF A REQUIREMENT OF THE PERMIT AND CAUSE FOR BOTH LEGAL ACTION AND REVOCATION OF THE PERMIT. 3. CHAPTER IV, SECTION 4.03.29 REQUIRES ANY PERSON WHO CONSTRUCTS, ALTERS OR INSTALLS AN INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM TO BE LICENSED. FINAL APPROVAL OF SYSTEM: (TO BE COMPLETED BY INSPECTOR): NO SYSTEM SHALL BE DEEMED TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE EAGLE COUNTY INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM REGULATIONS UNTIL THE SYSTEM IS APPROVED PRIOR TO COVERING ANY PORTION OF THE SYSTEM. INSTALLED ABSORPTION OR DISPERSAL AREA: 540 SQUAREFEET. via 15 infiltrator units INSTALLED SEPTIC TANK: 1250 GALLON 230 DEGREES 10 FEETFROM fbP rnrner of tha 11QldGe SEPTIC TANK ACCESS TO WITHIN 8" OF FINAL GRADE AND PROPER MATERIAL AND ASSEMBLY X_ YES _NO COMPLIANCE WITH COUNTY / STATE REQUIREMENTS: X_ YES _ NO ANY ITEM CHECKED NO REQUIRES CORRECTION BEFORE FINAL APPROVAL OF SYSTEM IS MADE. ARRANGE A RE -INSPECTION WHEN WORK IS CORRECTED. COMMENTS: ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH APPR - DATE: Apri 1 29, 1 Qom_ ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH APPROVAL: DATE: (RE -INSPECTION IF NECESSARY) RETAIN WITH RECEIPT RECORDS APPLICANT / AGENT: PERMIT PERCOLATION TEST FEE OWNER: RECEIPT # CHECK# (Site Plan MUST be attached) t ISDS Permit APPLICATION FOR INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PERMIT ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH OFFICE - EAGLE COUNTY P. O. BOX 179 EAGLE, CO 81631 328-8755/927-3823 (El Jebel) ************************************************************************** * -PERMIT APPLICATION FEE $150.00 PERCOLATION TEST FEE $200.00 * * * MAKE ALL REMITTANCE.PAYABLE TO: "EAGLE COUNTY TREASURER" PROPERTY OWNER: 4244 1..-j- PHONE MAILING ADDRESS: L 1 APPLICANT/ CONTACT PERS N : N PHONE: MAILING ADDRESS: 0V. �4_ ( to 3-01 0 DR LICENSED ISDS ONTRA OR i Q �ol^� PHONE • oZ COMPANY/DBA: S i ADDRESS: f9 A dX 9-46 19R1 k *************************************************************************** PERMIT APPLICATION IS FOR: O New Installation ( ) Alteration ( ) Repair LOCATION OF PROPOSED INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM: l`c S 5 &&4co2ea Building Permit # 0 �QL� � (if known) Legal Description: Subdivision: Filing:_Block: Lot No. Tax Parcel Number: 1 �j- �j - ( -_L2 Lot Size: �$cr2e� Street Address: C� �� Q22�(C lX=- CcQ �S�d(_ f=1lo'1^^ 139 LaA cRed BUILDING TYPE: (Check Uppil.CJte ia.CyuV1Y(Residential/Single Family SI _ . �1v Number of Bedrooms)_ ( ) Residential/Multi-Family* Number of Bedrooms ( ) Commercial/Industrial* Type TYPE OF WATER SUPPLY: (Check applicable category) ( ) Well ( Spring ( ) Surface ( ) Public Name of Supplier: *These syst require design by a Registered Professional Engineer SIGNATURE: Date : ( - -Aq , q ************************************************************************** TO BE COMPLETEW BY THE COUNTY z AMOUNT PAID: ��� ,(�'D .RECEIPT # : �'� J DATE: � CHECK #: 3 CASHIER: Community Development Department (970) 328-8730 Fax: (970) 328-7185 TDD: (970) 328,8797 EAGLE COUNTY. COLORADO April 29, 1998 Robert L. & Gail E. Newman P.O. Box 32 Avon, CO 81620 Eagle County Building P.O. Box 179 500 Broadway Eagle, Colorado 81631-0179 RE: Final of ISDS Permit #1556-96, Tax Parcel #1943-323-00-007. Property location: 1055 Beard Creek Rd., Edwards, CO. Dear Mr. & Mrs. Newman: This letter is to inform you that the above referenced ISDS Permit has been inspected and finalized. Enclosed is a copy to retain for your records. This permit does not indicate compliance with any other Eagle County requirements. Also enclosed is a brochure regarding the care of your septic system. Be aware that later changes to your building may require appropriate alterations of your septic system. If you have any questions regarding this permit, please contact the Eagle County Environmental Health Division at (970) 328-8755. Sincerely, Janet Kohl Environmental Health Department Eagle County Community Development ENCL:Informational Brochure Final ISDS Permit cc: files Community Development Department (970)32S-S730 Fax: (970) 328-7185 TDD: 1'9701 328-8797 EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO DATE: May 14, 1996 TO: Spiegel Construction FROM: Environmental Health Division Eagie County Building P.O. Box 179 500 Broadway Eaale, Colorado S 163 1 -0179 RE: Issuance of Individual Sewage Disposal System Permit No. 1556-96 Tax Parcel #1943-323-00-007. Property Location: 1055 Beard Creek Rd., Edwards, CO., Newman residence. Enclosed is your ISDS Permit No. 1556-96. It is valid for 120 days. The enclosed copy of the permit must be posted at the installation site. Any changes in plans or specifications invalidates the permit unless otherwise approved. Please call our office well in advance for the final inspection. Also enclosed is the ISDS Final Inspection Completeness Form. The items on this form need to be completed before you call for your final inspection. Also, please note any special conditions which may have been placed on the permit. If all items are not completed, a reinspection fee of $42.50 must be paid before a reinspection is made. Your building permit CO will not be issued until final approval has been given for the ISDS Permit. Permit specifications are minimum requirements only, and should be brought to the property owner's attention. This permit does not indicate conformance with other Eagle County requirements. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact the Environmental Health Division at 328- 8755. cc: files Commun! ; : iopment Department 17-1 328-8730 =28- 7 185 EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO DATE: November 20, 1997 TO: ISDS Permit Holders FROM: Eagle County Environmental Health Division RE: Incomplete ISDS System Files Eagle County Building P.O. Box 179 500 Broadway Eagle, Colorado 81631-0179 The Eagle County Environmental Health Division is in the process of updating our Individual Sewage Disposal System (ISDS) files in order to identify systems that may, or may not have been completed. The status of your septic system may affect the sale, refinancing, or Certificate of Occupancy (CO) of your property. For these reason we are attempting to update all incomplete files. Our records indicate that your Individual Sewage Disposal System (ISDS) Permit #155� for property located at 1055 h EftPQ a=K.0 �DtUA-t2��_, has been issued, but has not received final approval. For building currently under construction, your CO will not be issued without the Environmental Health Division's approval of your septic system. For systems already in operation, our records indicate that we need additional information submitted to our office for us to recognize and approve your system: Engineer final certification if your system was designed by a Registered Professional Engineer. Engineer final certification if your system is in operation, but was never inspected by the Environmental Health Division for proper installation and compliance. Environmental Health final inspection if your system did not require an engineer design, and has not yet been covered. These systems must be installed by Dec. 1, 1997, or you may need engineer certification for your CO if you plan on moving into your home this winter. Follow-up photographs of the installation from the property owner or installer for the following items: septic tank inlet/outlet "T" septic tank placement and or location relative to permanent landmarks installation of riser rings on septic tank to bring tank within 8" of finished grade 2( clean outs/inspection ports in sewer lines, effluent lines or absorption areas i� sewer line connection to dwelling showing the clean out czMk)(_ s PPrC'c O'L-Eojo ut sewer line connection to leach field Minor changes required to the leach field, such as replaced chambers, raked soils, etc... Detailed, scaled as -built site plan of system component locations and dimensions showing set backs. Receipts verifying materials installed. Please be assured that Eagle County Environmental Health has your best interests in mind with regards to this matter. It is our intent to verify that septic systems in Eagle County are in compliance, for the sake of protecting your property, and our groundwater resources that may be affected by Individual Sewage Disposal Systems. We intend to use this survey as a means of updating our files and assuring compliance. If you have any questions regarding the status of your ISDS permit file please call 970-328-8755. Please address all correspondence to: Eagle County Environmental Health P.O. Box 179 Eagle, CO 81631. �iitiess 2 HEPWORTH-PAWLAi< GEOTECHNICAL, INC. 5020 Road 154 Glenwood Springs, CO S1601 November 29, 1995 Fas 970 945-8454 Phone 970 94-79SS Bob Newman P.O. Box 957 Avon, Colorado 81620 Job No. 195 516 Subject: Subsoil Study for Foundation Design and Percolation Test, Proposed Residence, 0983 Beard Creek Road, Scottsville, Eagle County, Colorado. Dear Mr. Newman: As requested, Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. performed a subsoil study and percolation test for foundation and septic disposal designs at the subject site. The study was conducted in accordance with our agreement for geotechnical engineering services to you dated November 8, 1995. The data obtained and our recommendations based on the proposed construction and subsurface conditions encountered are presented in this report. Proposed Construction: The proposed residence will be a single story wood frame structure about 30 feet by 60 feet in plan size and located in the excavated building site as shown on Fig. 1. Ground floor will be structural over a crawlspace. Garage floor will be slab -on -grade. Cut depths are expected to be about 4 feet. Foundation loadings for this type of construction are assumed to be relatively light. If building conditions or foundation loadings are significantly different from those described above, we should be notified to reevaluate the recommendations presented in this report. Site Conditions: An existing main house and barn are located to the south of the proposed residence. The immediate area adjacent the building site was vacant at the time of our field work. A relatively flat building pad had been cut between about 0 to 9 feet deep for construction of the residence. The site is located in gently roiling terrain which slopes down to the south with approximately 10 feet of elevation difference across the building area. Vegetation over the site consists of sagebrush and juniper trees. Subsurface Conditions: The subsurface conditions at the site were evaluated by excavating two exploratory pits in the building site and one profile pit in the septic disposal area at the approximate locations shown on Fig. 1. The logs of the pits are presented on Fig. 2. The subsoils encountered varied slightly in each of the pits, but generally consisted of stiff sandy clay and silt and medium dense clayey sand with scattered gravels. Results of swell -consolidation testing performed on relatively undisturbed samples of the subsoils, presented on Fig. 4, indicate the clays have low compressibility potential upon loading and wetting. The sample of clayey sand tested showed a slight collapse potential (consolidation upon wetting under a light surcharge Bob Newman November 29, 1995 Page 2 load) and moderate consolidation with additional loading. Results of a gradation analysis performed on a sample of gravelly sandy clay (minus 1 1/2 -inch fraction) obtained from the site are presented on Fig. 5. No free water was observed in the pits at the time of excavation and the soils were slighty moist to moist. Foundation Recommendations: Considering the subsoil conditions encountered in the exploratory pits and the nature of the proposed construction, we recommend spread footings placed on the undisturbed natural soil designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of 1,500 psf for support of the proposed residence. There could be some post - construction settlement if the bearing soils become wetted. Footings should be a minimum width of 16 inches for continuous walls and 2 feet for columns. Loose and disturbed soils encountered at the foundation bearing level within the excavation should be removed and the footing bearing level extended down to the undisturbed natural soils. Exterior footings should be provided with adequate cover above their bearing elevations for frost protection. Placement of footings at least 42 inches below the exterior grade is typically used in this area., Continuous foundation walls should be reinforced top and bottom to span local anomalies such as by assuming an unsupported length of at least 12 feet. Foundation walls acting as retaining structures should be designed to resist a lateral earth pressure based on an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 50 pcf for the on -site soil as backfill. Floor Slabs:. The building floor will be structural above crawlspace. In slab -on -grade garage area, the natural on -site soils should be suitable to support lightly loaded slab construction. To reduce the effects of some differential movement, floor slabs should be separated from all bearing walls and columns with expansion joints which allow unrestrained vertical movement. Floor slab control joints should be used to reduce damage due to shrinkage cracking. The requirements for joint spacing and slab reinforcement should be established by the designer based on experience and the intended slab use. Fill materials and the subgrade that supports floor slabs should be compacted to at least 95 % of maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Required fill can consist of the on -site soils devoid of vegetation and topsoil or a suitable imported material such as road base aggregate. Surface Drainage: The following drainage precautions should be observed during construction and maintained at all times after the residence has been completed: H-P GEOTECH Bob Newman November 29, 1995 Page 3 1) Inundation of the foundation excavations and underslab areas should be avoided during construction. 2) Exterior backfill should be adjusted to near optimum moisture and compacted to at least 95 % of the maximum standard Proctor density in pavement and slab areas and to at least 90 % of the maximum standard Proctor density in landscape areas. 3) The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be sloped to drain away from the foundation in all directions. We recommend a minimum slope of 12 inches in the first 10 feet in unpaved areas and a minimum slope of 3 inches in the first 10 feet in pavement and walkway areas. 4) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill. Percolation Testing: The results of percolation tests conducted at the site are presented in Table I. The test locations are shown on Fig. 1 and the log of the profile pit is shown on Fig. 2. The percolation rates varied from 13 to 30 minutes per inch with an average of about 20 minutes per inch. Based on our findings, the tested site is suitable for a conventional infiltration septic system. Limitations: This report has been prepared in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no other warranty either expressed or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the exploratory pits excavated at the locations indicated on Fig. 1, the proposed type of construction and our experience in the area. Our findings include interpolation and extrapolation of the subsurface conditions identified at the exploratory pits and variations in the subsurface conditions may not become evident until excavation is performed. If conditions encountered during construction appear different from those described in this report, we should be notified at once so re-evaluation of the recommendations may be made. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for design purposes. We are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our information. As the project evolves, we should provide continued consultation and field services during construction to review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations, and to verify that the recommendations have been appropriately interpreted. Significant design H-P GEOTECH Bob Newman November 29, 1995 Page 4 changes may require additional analysis or modifications to the recommendations presented herein. We recommend on -site observation of excavations and foundation bearing strata and testing of structural fill by a representative of the soil engineer. If you have any questions or if we may be of further assistance, please call our office. Sincerely, HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. RD GI s'�.�,. Jor y Z. A mson, Jr., P. E t° 99707 R iewed By: Steven L. Pawlak, P.E. JZA/kmk Attachments cc: Michael G. Perkin, Architect H-P GEOTECH Pit 1 Pit 2 Profile Elev.=101' Elev.=100' Pit Elev.=97.5' 105 105 100 of 100 „ We=14.9 Q) DD= 109 Ljca 01 _' —200= 86 WC= 6. 1 95 DD= 98 95 0 Q) +4= 8 —200= 67 LL= 31 90 PI= 15 90 85 85 Note: Explanation of symbols is shown on Figure 3. HEPWORTH-PAWLAK 195 516 Logs of Exploratory Pits Eig-_2 GEOTECHNICAL, Inc. LEGEND: TOPSOIL; silty sandy clay, organics, moist,'brown. CLAY AND SILT (CL-ML); sandy, stiff, moist, light brown. Slightly calcareous below 3 112 feet. FCLAY (CL); silty, sandy, stiff, moist, light brown. SAND (SC); clayey, gravelly, medium dense, moist, light brown. SAND AND CLAY (SC-CL); silty, slightly gravelly, medium dense, slightly moist to moist. Calcareous below 4 feet. 2-inch diameter hand driven liner sample. Disturbed bulk sample. NOTES: 1. Exploratory pits were excavated on November 9, 1995 with a John Deere 410D rubber -tired backhoe. 2. Locations of exploratory pits were measured approximately by pacing from features -shown on the site plan provided. 3. Elevations of exploratory pits were measured by hand level and refer to the Bench Mark on Fig. 1. 4. The exploratory pit locations and elevations should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. 5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory pit logs represent the approximate boundaries between material types and transitions may be gradual. 6. No free water was encountered in the pits at the time of excavating. Fluctuations in water level may occur with time. 7. Laboratory Testing Results: WC=Water Content (%) DD=Dry Density (pcf) +4=Percent retained on No. 4 sieve -200=Percent passing No. 200 sieve LL=Liquid Limit (%) PI=Plasticity Index (%) HEPWORTH-PAWLAK 195 516 GEOTECHNICAL, Inc. Legend and Notes Fig. 3 0 0 c 0 � 1 z-4 a 0 U 0 01, No Movement Upon Wetting Moisture Content = 14.9 percent Dry Unit Weight = 109 pcf Sample of: Sandy Silty Clay From: pit 1 @ 3 Feet 0.1 1.0 10 100 APPLIED PRESSURE - ksf 0 1 4 5 Moisture Content = 6. 1 percent Dry Unit Weight = 98 pcf Sample of: clayey sand From: Pit 2 @ 4 Feet Compression Wetting Upon 0.1 I •U 10 100 APPLIED PRESSURE - ksf 195 516 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK I SWELL -CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Fig. 4 GEOTECHNICAL, Inc. HYDnOMFTES ANALYSIS SIEVE ANALYSIS • � ����-�-�_����� ram• ��� %%�� r�//r��■�r��r ���Q���rrr�rrrr•rrr�M ggffiga �ras•��-�r� ���� �/ •ter •.�.�_ me ME _mom j • • HYOn• WXAktoj&*L�-d"I� • �}� �r-®� GRADATION TEST RESULTS i 7 , �■���■ r��G�� Cirra��G s�a_�err■ LL 0 D .a -a d c co m O Y ca o 0 le U �, cts a� L tll W � U co L CO >% U)a a a m coo coo CD (9 U cn U W W _ Z ~ pZ IL r d o 63 0 g o c J IL K W m W F a O F c's c+M o o Z a co Olu I� 6 z a CO I,n c0 6 z :: N o 0 o m i Co C O J }O = C i� 0 c z G lu Z .. 0 o co = CD o m i Cl I- qCT a � R ti 0 J d 40 i N HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. Job No. 195 516 TABLE II PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS HOLE NO. HOLE DEPTH LENGTH OF WATER WATER DROP IN AVERAGE (INCHES) INTERVAL (MIN) DEPTH AT START OF INTERVAL DEPTH AT END OF INTERVAL WATER LEVEL (INCHES) PERCOLATION RATE (MINANCH) (INCHES) INCHES P-1 63 15 9 7 2 J.S 7 5 112 1 112 8114 7 1 114 ` Water Added 7 5 314 1 114 8114 7 1 114 Water Added 7 6 1 i5 Water Added ti 15 8 7 1 P-2 56112 15 9114 8112 314 110 8 112 7 112 1 7 112 7 112 30 7 6 1 8114 7112 314 Water Added 7 112 7 112 ° 7 6112 112 330 P-3 54112 15 10314 91/4 1112 I° 9 114 7 1/2 1 3/4 ih 71/2 6112 1 Water Added/ �v 9 3/4 8112 1 114 8 112 7 114 1 114 7 114 6 1 114 Water Added 13 �y 9 8 1 NOTE: Percolation test holes were hand dug and soaked on November 12, 1995. Tests were performed on November 13, 1995. HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. Bob Newman P.O. Box 957 Avon, Colorado 81620 5020 Road 154 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Fax 970 945-8454 Phone 970 945-7988 Invoice No. 2707GS Job. No. 195 516 November 30, 1995 Subject: Subsoil Study for Foundation Design and Percolation Test, Proposed Residence, 0983 Beard Creek Road, Scottsville, Eagle County, Colorado FIELD INVESTIGATION Field Engineer: 7.0 hrs. @ $40.00/hr. Pickup Mileage: 55 mi. @ $.40/mi. LABORATORY TESTING Moisture/Density: 2 tests @ $10.00/ea. Atterberg Limits: 1 test @ $45.00/ea. Standand Swell -Consolidation: 2 tests @ $55.00/ea. Standard Sieves to #200: 1 test @ $40.00/ea. % Less than #200 Sieve: 2 tests @ $20.00/ea. ENGINEERING & CLERICAL Project Manager: .5 hrs. @ $80.00/hr. Project Engineer: 3.0 hrs. @ $60.00/hr. Draftsperson: 2.0 hrs. @ $35.00/hr. Word Processing: 3.0 hrs. @ $30.00/hr. Thank you. J rdy Adamson, Jr. P.E. /lank $280.00 22.00 20.00 45.00 110.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 180.00 70.00 90.00 TOTAL $937.00 PROPOSAL ESTIMATE $900.00 ISDS Permit #4h Dated ISDS Final Inspection Completeness Form 04 Tank is (ZSD gal. Tank Material 7105+ie- .X Tank is located /D ft. and Z: e degrees from F'.d!!uy d (permanent landmark) Tank is located ft. and degrees from (permanent landmark) Tank set level. �C Tank lids within 8" of finished grade. 7� Size of field -5'D f t 2 units lineal ft. Technology ) n<5 Cm,JI '0c-a- Cleanout is installed in between tank and house (+ 1/100ft) . -PI JJ .., N� There is a "T" that goes down 14 inches in the inlet and outlet of the tank. x Inlet and outlet is sealed with tar tape, rubber gasket etc. Tank has two compartments with the larger compartment closest to the house. x Measure distance and relative direction to field. . Depth of field ft. Soil interface raked. _ Inspection portals at the end of each trench. Proper distance to setbacks. X Chambers properly installed as per manufacturers specifications. (Chambers latched, end plates properly installed, rocks removed from trenches, etc.) X Other Ay:110s1-i '►7la-L-5 Inspection meets requirements. Copy form to installer's file if recommendations for improvement were suggested. ACTION TAKEN: O (mot- tlJ r—� E7 y�2lc� �- Setbacks Well Potable House Property Lake Dry Tank Drain - Water Lines line Stream Gulch Field 100 25 20 10 50 25 10 10 Tank 50 10 5 10 50 10 * 10 SHEET NO. CALCULATED BY OF DATE CHECKED BY DATE Rr—Al F ;:::-:- 7:4-1 :S.-; z SnIelsi 215-1 i Pagded! T Inc Groton. mass. 01471 To Orc-r P40NE TOLL FREE i.600-224-638-3 1556-96 Tax#1943-323-00-007 JOB NAME _ 1055 Beard Creek Rd NEWMAN .JOB NO. Edwards, CO JOB LOCATION • BILL TO DATE STARTED DATE COMPLETED DATE FULLED �� zo Igo na.l i vi ec ► I t lil l ell,9 A � S' aLl _�l z 1 o (� N -2 S J JOB COST SUMMARY TOTAL SELLING PRICE TOTAL MATERIAL TOTAL LABOR INSURANCE SALES TAX MISC. COSTS TOTAL JOB COST GROSS PROFIT LESS OVERHEAD COSTS % OF SELLING PRICE NET PROFIT JOB FOLDER Product 278 �@ NEW ENGLAND BUSINESS SERVICE, INC., GROTON. MA 01471 JOB FOLDER Printed in U.S.A.