HomeMy WebLinkAbout672 Webb Peak - 210720102001 - 2223-02ISINDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PERMIT EAGLE COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION P.O. Box 179 - 500 Broadway • Eagle, CO 81631 Telephone: (970) 328-8755 COPY OF PERMIT MUST BE POSTED AT INSTALLATION SITE. PERMIT NO. 2223-02 BP NO. 14439 OWNER: MIKE AND NANCY MEYER PHONE: 703-757-7408 MAILING ADDRESS: 10421 NEW ASCOT DRIVE, GREAT FALLS, VA 22066 APPLICANT: DANA FANTAUZZO, SUMMIT HABITATS PHONE: 970-926-1743 SYSTEM LOCATION:_672 WEBB PEAK, EDWARDS, CO TAX PARCEL NO. 2107-201-02-001 LICENSED INSTALLER: DEFINA CONSTRUCTION, GARY DEFINA LICENSE NO. 75-02 PHONE: 970-328-0900 DESIGN ENGINEER: LKP ENGINEERING, LUIZA PETTROVSKA PHONE NO. 970-926-9088 INSTALLATION GRANTED FOR THE FOLLOWING: MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR A 6 BEDROOM RESIDENCE 2500 GALLON CONCRETE SEPTIC TANK, 3007 SQUARE FEET OF ABSORPTION AREA CREDIT, VIA 97 STANDARD INFILTRATOR UNITS, AS PER ENGINEER'S DESIGN DATED AUGUST 22, 2002. SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: INSTALL PER ENGINEER'S DESIGN DATED 8/22/02 IN SERIAL DISTRIBUTION IN TRENCHES WITH A CLEAN -OUT BETWEEN THE TANK AND THE HOUSE, AND INSPECTION PORTALS IN EACH TRENCH RAKE ALL TRENCH SURFACES TO PREVENT THE SMEARING OF SOILS, AND DO NOT INSTALL IN WET WEATHER BE SURE TO MAINTAIN ALL APPLICABLE SET -BACK REQUIREMENTS. CALL EAGLE COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH AND THE DESIGN ENGINEER FOR THE FINAL INSPECTION PRIOR TO BACK -FILLING ANY PART OF THE INSTALLATION, OR WITH ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING THE INSTALLATION. THE BUILDING CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL THE SEPTIC SYSTEM HAS BEEN INSPECTED AND APPROVED. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH APPROVAL: RAYMOND P. MERRY DATE: SEPTEMBER 27, 2002 CONDITIONS: 1. ALL INSTALLATIONS MUST COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE EAGLE COUNTY INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM REGULATIONS, ADOPTED PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GRANTED IN 25-10-104, 1973, AS AMENDED. 2. THIS PERMIT IS VALID ONLY FOR CONNECTION TO STRUCTURES WHICH HAVE FULLY COMPLIED WITH COUNTY ZONING AND BUILDING REQUIREMENTS. CONNECTION TO, OR USE WITH ANY DWELLING OR STRUCTURE NOT APPROVED BY THE ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENTS SHALL AUTOMATICALLY BE A VIOLATION OF A REQUIREMENT OF THE PERMIT, AND WILL RESULT IN BOTH LEGAL ACTION AND REVOCATION OF THE PERMIT. 3. CHAPTER IV, SECTION 4.03.29 REQUIRES ANY PERSON WHO CONSTRUCTS, ALTERS OR INSTALLS AN INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM TO BE LICENSED. FINAL APPROVAL OF SYSTEM (TO BE COMPLETED BY INSPECTOR): NO SYSTEM SHALL BE DEEMED TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE EAGLE COUNTY INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM REGULATIONS UNTIL THE SYSTEM IS APPROVED PRIOR TO COVERING ANY PORTION OF THE SYSTEM. INSTALLED ABSORPTION OR DISPERSAL AREA: 3007 SQUARE FEET (VIA 97 INFILTRATOR UNITS PER DESIGN 1 INSTALLED 2500 GALLON SEPTIC TANK LOCATED 250 DEGREES AND 41 FEET 6 INCHES FROM THE CLOSEST CLEAN - OUT #2 ON THE NORTH WESTERN SIDE OF THE HOUSE. COMMENTS: THE FINAL INSPECTIONS WERE DONE BY LAURA FAWCETT OF EAGLE COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH AND THE DESIGN ENGINEER. THE ENGINEER'S FINAL CERTIFICATION AND AS -BUILT DRAWING WERE RECEIVED ON FEBRUARY 26, 2004. THIS SYSTEM IS LARGE ENOUGH TO ACCOMMODATE A 6 BEDROOM RESIDENCE. ANY ITEM NOT MEETING REQUIREMENTS WILL BE CORRECTED BEFORE FINAL APPROVAL OF SYSTEM IS MADE. ARRANGE A RE -INSPECTION WHEN WORK IS COMPLETED. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH APPROVA4�2W a, Jurt& DATE: APRIL 12, 2004 INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PERMIT EAGLE COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION P.O. Box 179 - 500 Broadway • Eagle, CO 81631 Telephone: (970) 328-8755 COPY OF PERMIT MUST BE POSTED AT INSTALLATION SITE. PERMIT NO. 2223-02 BP NO. 14439 OWNER: MIKE AND NANCY MEYER PHONE: 703-757-7408 MAILING ADDRESS: 10421 NEW ASCOT DRIVE, GREAT FALLS, VA 22066 APPLICANT: DANA FANTAUZZO, SUMMIT HABITATS PHONE: 970-926-1743 SYSTEM LOCATION: 672 WEBB PEAK, EDWARDS, CO TAX PARCEL NO. 2107-201-02-001 LICENSED INSTALLER: DEFINA CONSTRUCTION, GARY DEFINA LICENSE NO. 75-02 PHONE: 970-328-0900 DESIGN ENGINEER: LKP ENGINEERING, LUIZA PETTROVSKA PHONE NO. 970-926-9088 INSTALLATION HEREBY GRANTED FOR THE FOLLOWING: MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR A 6 BEDROOM RESIDENCE 2500 GALLON CONCRETE SEPTIC TANK, 3007 SQUARE FEET OF ABSORPTION AREA CREDIT, VIA 97 STANDARD INFILTRATOR UNITS. AS PER ENGINEER'S DESIGN DATED AUGUST 22, 2002. SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: INSTALL AS PER ENGINEER'S DESIGN DATED 8/22/02, IN SERIAL DISTRIBUTION IN TRENCHES, WITH A CLEAN -OUT BE- TWEEN THE TANK AND THE HOUSE, AND INSPECTION PORTALS IN EACH TRENCH. RAKE ALL TRENCH SURFACES TO PREVENT THE SMEARING OF SOILS, AND DO NOT INSTALL IN WET WEATHER. BE SURE TO MAINTAIN ALL APPLICABLE SET -BACK REQUIREMENTS. CALL EAGLE COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH AND THE DESIGN ENGINEER FOR THE FINAL INSPECTION PRIOR TO BACK -FILLING ANY PART OF THE INSTALL- ATION, OR WITH ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING THE INSTALLATION. THE BUILDING CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL NOT BE ISSUED UN- TIL THE SEPTIC SYSTEM HAS BEEN INSPE AND A ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH APPROVAL -. DATE: SEPTEMBER 27, 2002 CONDITIONS: 1. ALL INSTALLATIONS MUST COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE EAGLE COUNTY INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM REGULATIONS, ADOPTED PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GRANTED IN 25-10-104, 1973, AS AMENDED. 2. THIS PERMIT IS VALID ONLY FOR CONNECTION TO STRUCTURES WHICH HAVE FULLY COMPLIED WITH COUNTY ZONING AND BUILDING REQUIREMENTS. CONNECTION TO, OR USE WITH ANY DWELLING OR STRUCTURE NOT APPROVED BY THE ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENTS SHALL AUTOMATICALLY BE A VIOLATION OF A REQUIREMENT OF THE PERMIT, AND WILL RESULT IN BOTH LEGAL ACTION AND REVOCATION OF THE PERMIT. 3. CHAPTER IV, SECTION 4.03.29 REQUIRES ANY PERSON WHO CONSTRUCTS, ALTERS OR INSTALLS AN INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM TO BE LICENSED. FINAL APPROVAL OF SYSTEM (TO BE COMPLETED BY INSPECTOR): NO SYSTEM SHALL BE DEEMED TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE EAGLE COUNTY INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM REGULATIONS UNTIL THE SYSTEM IS APPROVED PRIOR TO COVERING ANY PORTION OF THE SYSTEM. INSTALLED ABSORPTION OR DISPERSAL AREA: SQUARE FEET (VIA ) INSTALLED TANK: GALLONS IS LOCATED DEGREES AND FEET INCHES FROM COMMENTS: ANY ITEM NOT MEETING REQUIREMENTS WILL BE CORRECTED BEFORE FINAL APPROVAL OF SYSTEM IS MADE. ARRANGE A RE -INSPECTION WHEN WORK IS COMPLETED. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH APPROVAL DATE: Incomplete Applications Will NOT Be Accepted (Site' Plan MUST be attached) ISDS Permit # .2- 3 - d 2- Building Permit # _ c. APPLICATION FOR INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PERMIT ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH OFFICE - EAGLE COUNTY P. O. BOX 179 EAGLE, CO 81631 Eagle (970)328-8755, Fax (970)328-0349, El Jebel (970)927-3823 **************************************************************************** * FEE SCHEDULE * APPLICATION FEE $350.00 * THIS FEE INCLUDES THE ISDS PERMIT, SITE EVALUATION (PERCOLATION TEST, * SOIL PROFILE OBSERVATION) AND FINAL INSPECTION * ADDITIONAL FEES MAY BE CHARGED IF A REINSPECTION IS NECESSARY, OR A * PRE -CONSTRUCTION SITE VISIT OR CONSULTATION IS NEEDED * REINSPECTION FEE $47.00, PRE -CONSTRUCTION SITE VISIT FEE $85.00 * MAKE ALL..REMITTANCE PAYABLE TO: "EAGLE COUNTY TREASURER" **************************************************************************** PROPERTY OWNER: IV ` l IL AM � I V AA 04 AA MAILING ADDRESS: Z- & CYA. rl t k PHONE : 7G5 757 7-faj� viv 7- APPLICANT/CONTACT PERSON: _SiAM6�11,1� IT0147i" / ,n� -," �7, -LICENSED SYSTEMS CONTRACTOR: A .y\1 V e,-� V A COMPANY/DBA : I l 164 S I KVI'ADDRESS: PHONE: dl-& l7+3 PHONE: *************************************************************************** PERMIT APPLICATION IS FOR: ( NEW INSTALLATION ( ) ALTERATION ( ) REPAIR LOCATION OF PROPOSED INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM: Legal Description: Tax Parcel Number: Physical Address: Z10 -7 Zo 6 -7,001 Lot Size: t 7-' �e5 BUILDING TYPE: (Check applicable category) Residential/Single Family Residential/Multi-Family* ( ) Commercial/Industrial* Number Number Type _ of Bedrooms. 5 of Bedrooms *These systems require design by a Registered Professional Engineer TYPE OF WATER SUPPLY: (Check applicable category) (,) Well ( ) Spring ( ) Surface qQ Public. Name of Supplier:vy APPLICANT SIGNATURE: Date: *************************************************************************** AMOUNT PAID: � RECEIPT #)-: a- DATE:a- CHECK # : .-- CASHIER: DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH (970) 328-8755 FAX (970) 328-8788 TDD: (970) 328-8797 TOLL FREE: 800-225-8136 www.eagle-county.com EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO Date: September 27, 2002 TO: Defina Construction Raymond P. Merry, REHS Director FROM: Environmental Health Division RE: Issuance of Individual Sewage Disposal System Permit #2223-02. Tax Parcel #2107-201-02-001. Property Location: 672 Webb Peak, Edwards, CO., Meyer residence. Enclosed is your ISDS Permit #2223-02, and a field copy of the engineer design stipulated on the ...permit. It is valid for .120 days, .or for the duration: of your current building permit for this v .- property. The enclosed copy of the permit must be posted at the installation site.: Any changes .; in plans or specifications invalidates the permit unless otherwise approved. Please note any special requirements that may have been added to the design 'by this department. Systems _designed by a Registered Professional Engineer must be certified by the Engineer, indicating that the system was installed as specified. Eagle County Environmental Health must also view the installation prior to back filling. Please call well in advance for your final inspection. Your TCO will not be issued until our office receives this certification - from the engineer, and views the installation. Permit specifications are minimum requirements only, and should be brought to the property owner's attention. This permit does not indicate conformance with other Eagle County requirements. Please notify this office if you have not been contracted to perform this installation. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact the Environmental Health Division at 328- 8755. cc: files LKP Engineering, Luiza Pettrovska OLD COURTHOUSE BUILDING, 551 Broadway, P.O. Box 179, Eagle, Colorado 81631-0179 DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH (970)328-8755 FAX: (970) 328=8788 TOLL FREE:800-225-6136 www.eaglecounty.us April 12, 2004 Mike and Nancy Meyer 10421 New Ascot Drive Great Falls, VA 22066 EAGLE COUNTY RAYMOND P. MERRY, REHS Director RE: Final of ISDS Permit #2223-02, Tax Parcel #2107-201-02-001. Property location: 672 Webb Peak, Edwards, CO. Dear Mr. and Mrs. Meyer: This letter is to inform you that the above referenced ISDS Permit has been inspected and finalized. Enclosed is a copy to retain for your records. This permit does not indicate compliance with any other Eagle County requirements. Also enclosed is a brochure regarding the care of your septic system. Be aware that later changes to your building may require appropriate alterations of your septic system. If you have any questions regarding this permit, please contact the Eagle County Environmental Health Division at (970) 328-8755. Sincerely, Janet Kohl Eagle County Environmental Health Department ENCL: Educational Brochure Final ISDS Permit cc: files, April 2004 Chrono file 500 Broadway, P.O. Box 179, Eagle, Colorado 81631-0179 ISDS PERMIT # a � 2 3 PERCOLATION TEST EAGLE COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEATLH UWNEK: 'vl k2 uN d NAdv c�! •PHSYSICAL ADDRESS: t 7 "a, W e b Peak LEGAL DESCRIPTION: L 6"t o i 1 n C o- MAILING ADDRESS: w A S C c9 �' O f " ti y g TYPE OF DWELLING: N 4 c S NUMBER OF BEDROOMS: IIIE��N(FjMl�l[E���IiEjIME�MIF��jN(E��������i(F�I! ��NHII��jN�N(E���jM(E�It�IME�j11 TEST HOLES PRE-SOAKED: YES NO TIME WATER DEPTH INCHES OF FALL RATE ct�F. 7Jv SOIL PROFILE ni mmma loll mmmmmm mmmmmm m mmmmmm m mmmmmm m mmmmmm m mmmmmm mm mmmmmm mm mmmmmm m Emmmmmm mm 1 Mr, 1 U 1JKUr LAN 1-1NUH: PERC RATE: MINIMUM LEACH FIELD SIZE: MINIMUM SEPTIC TANK SIZE: COMMENTS: f 0 v cl w �rT 2 �j Y C !l►'t' c -a n 4 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SPECIALIST DATE O YL 11 1 n4AL V L LKP Engineering, Inc. CIVIUGEpMMN(CApL February 26, 2004 Mir. Todd Labine Summit Habitats, Inc. E.Q. Box 1829 Edwards, CO 81632 Dear Todd: ICE: Inspection of Septic System Installation Lot 5, Block 1, Cordillera Filing No. 35 672 Webb Peak Road F-agle County, Colorado Project No. 02022 - ISDS Permit No. 2223-02 At the request of Mr. Gary Defina, Defina Construction, on September 20, October 28 and 29, November 4, 2003, and February 24, 2004, we visited the construction site on Lot 5, Block 1, Cordillera Filing No. 35, 672 Webb Peak road, Eagle County, Colorado. The purpose of our site visits was to inspect the installation of the septic system. They installed the system in overall compliance with the septic system design., Drawing No. 02022SD.DWG, dated March 25, 2002, as shown on the attached as -built sketch. They installed a 2500-gallon, two compartments, a precast, concrete, septic tank. Two building, sewer lines were connected to the septic tank. CIeanouts were installed on both lines between the house and the septic tank. Ninety-seven,, Standard Jitifiltrator Chambers were installed in seven trenches with 16 infiltrators in the first three trenches, 15 in the fourth, 12 in the fifth and eleven in each of the last two trenches. The infiltrators were connected with serial distribution. In the first and last infiltrator of each trench, inspection ports were installed. Horizontal distance from center to center of the drenches was 10 feet. The effluent line was 4-inch. SDR 35 PVC. The additional profile hole was excavated on September 20, 2003, as requested. The soil profile in the new proftle hole consisted of 3.5 feet of topsoil over 4.5 feet of reddish -brown, clayey -gravelly sand with angular rock fragments, Ground water was not encountered. If you bavc any questions, please do not hesitate to Gail. Sincerely, LEPEnzineerh r 01"�E Luiza Petrovska, President Enclosure cc: Mrs. Laura Fawcett, Eagle County Environmental Health Department, fax# 328-8788 CAwr a a-LKP\02022osi.wpd P.O. Box 2837, Edwards, CO 81632, (970) 926-9088 Tel, (970) 926-9089 Fax =D-0C_0MrAA Tui 1 11 • ACCM Tr)-Ccsri C r•ni IKITY CKftl WGQl Tu PQCW=-P v � � vv r ay. —ra 1 � ��L�.: ��.. t.l Lf�l LI Yt.ill'ILLIt11Yk.r1 11`Iks FAx TRANSMISSION LKP EZYGI[1m EERING, INC. P.O. Box 2837 Edwards, CO 81632 (970) 926-9088 Fax: (970) 926-9089 E-zaxail: cn ant e . et To: Laura Fawcett Fax: 328-8788 Phone: 328-8757 From: Luiza Petrovska,, PE Subject; Septic as -built - Meyer Residence COMMENTS: Date; February 26, 2004 Wages: 3 including this cover sheet. Project: 02022 ISDS Permit No. 2223-02 RRR-RG-Rv1Gia TI-II Ill -4rnhl Tn-Fdirl R mi IWTV PWIJ WP701 TN pnf=-9 P.0, Box 2837, Edwards, CO 81632, (970) 926-9088 Tot, (970) 926-9089 Fax FFA-PG-2004 THU 11:46AM ID:EAGLE COUNTY ENV HEALTH PAGE:3 03-Jul-2002 11:09am From -Slifer Smith & Frampton Divide Sales Off � r 2'01 P.002 07/03/2002 09:31 FAX 970926485]r, Duman T1JL=3-��02 09 ti4 k}-p GEOTECH ..�_ �1e�wartli pnwlak 00OLCet4ldcair IriC. 5021) Cam' g0a81S4 Glenwood 1prilms, �iorfldo S1d01 pitaYic. 970-945.796 S axe 970 946-3454 �PSe°@►�pgcoirsh.com February 4, 2002 SOMI3Xt Tlabh= At=. D ' Fantauzzo Job No. 101 P.O. Bost 1829 -rdwards, Colorado 81632 Lot 5 eoteo C R�YisW, Proposed Meyer Residell' l r da ' $loch Sabject: 35, Webb PeakI st Cord311.era, Eagle County, F-462 .14Usi Dear Ms. Fantauzzo: , site lau by ALIVE Alcchitel ts, Inc. for geaomth� al As requested, we have re doomed the P for foundation dessgct t o. co.didons. We previously ducted aa;resubsoil study subject she and pt egeu�, our findings in a. report dated }�ove�aber 30, a041, Job N 101748. wood fmle ent: The develapmellt Plan conslsted of a two story prgposed Develugm ade ground floor shifted s2}ghrly ficom that Shown out straetare wish a slab -on gr vela a wag modified *oM its vri$e� 1 Pe previous teport. J1z addition, the bu�7diug P , building W�,g>a.Ysrion but roug�lV occupies the same Ioeatibn as the oriigi� Five exploratoiY pits wero excavated in the area of the Subsurface Co�di>idons. s>absoils encntmteted below about Ifa ico 2 o f feet vva� was proposed building area. Thecla matt�x- rAnslst of basalt cobbles and boulders 1xl a 95 mcouutered m the pits and the soils were siightiy rcwist to rub�t- The cu,=E development plan appears � Conclusions and �Eommendattons. went of the lot. E=vatio�x in consistent with our recomnw3datiots far develop a =nt and bard basalt rort will be dif cttlt and may TeTu crock excavz ing tia1 rovhich blasCing. The clay ma.�ix sods could cons,�ction.. setdementlheave p � should be evaluated at the. tmie of lease let us lmo If there are day quest%ons or if we may be of fig assistance, p Si»erely, pv�TORTpT - PAwLAIC GEOT.BcuNicAL,1NC. RECEIVED 'AUG 2 2 2002 jordy Z. Ada"son, Jr., P-E. Rev. by: SLP 3ZAlksw ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT U-dul-Z002 11:09am From -Slifer Smith & Frampton Divide Sales Off 07/03/2002 09:31 FAX 970926485r_ __ DUMMii irrXM.L1A1N JUL--213-20M 09:14 H—P woTECH ..,' T-201 P.003/011 F-462 Gec�tecn November 30, 2001 Hepworth-P2WWt'Ge0teL"lfl 2" Ine' anZU County Road 154 Gleawood Spria� , Colorado SIG01 Phone:970-945- 938 -jrp,z 97o�94M434 ]lpgao Cc� thg�vo to ch.com Summit Habitats Attu. -Dana Fantauzzo P.O. Box 1829 Job No. 101748 Edwards, Colorado 81632 Subject., Subsoil Study for Foundatiou Design, P'roposcd Residence, Lot 5,1 1, Filing 35, Webb Peak I at Cordillera; Eagle County, Colorado. Dear Ms. Fantauzzo: As requested, Hepworth-pawlak Geatecttttical, inc:. performed a subsoil study for design of foundations at the subject site. The study was conducted in accordance our agred=nt for geotedmical eagineeriag services to Summit Habitats dated November 8, 2001. The data obtained and our recommendations based on the pri constmrtdon and subsurface Conditions encountered axe presented in this report. Repworth-Pa-wlek Geotechnical, luc. previously conducted a preliminary geotech engincering study for the subdivision and presented our findings to Cordillera Constructions Corporation in a report dated June 17, 1999, Job No. 1-99 345. Proposed Construction: The proposed residence will be a two story wood frame structure located on the site as shown on Fig. 1, eround floor will be slab -on -grade. Cut depths are expected to range between about 4 to 6 feet. Foundation 10Idir;6 fo this type of corjstruction are assumed to be reladveiy light typicalof the propos type of construction. If building conditions or fowdation loadings are sipfficandy diffeYem from rhosent d in desert'bed above, we should be notified to re-evaluate the recumm=dations p es flaiS TVOrt. Site Conditions: The site was vacant and covered with a minor amount of show =Ver at the time of our -field work. The proposed residence will be located =ar tbL tap f a =211 knoll, The glrouud surface iu the building area slopes strongly to moderately steep down to the northwest and southeast at grades up to about 15% . Them is ab tlt 8 to 10 feet of elevation differe=e in the Proposed building envelope. 'There is a v steep slope down to the southease at 60 % grade south of the building envelope. Vegetation consists of aspen trees, scruboak, grass and weeds. Basalt boulders arc exposed on the ground surface. Subsurface Conditions: The subsurface conditions at the site were evalumcd by excavadng five exploratory pies at the approximate locations shown on pig. 1. Tit h logs 03-Jul-2002 11:09am From -Slifer Smith Frampton Divide Sales Off 07/03/2002 09:32 NAX V7U!JZb41L'-tR Nvuuaij_ I,c,x­ AA " JU[.:83-�H02 H9 15 H--P C.EOTECH T-201 P.004/011 F-462 .134/11 Sum33,it Rabimts November 30, 2001 i Pe. e 2 f g i1� are resented on Fig- Z. The subsoils �Gout�ered, below about i/� to �yz. of the p P clay matrix. feet of topsoil, consist of dense basalt Cobbles and bo � Presence �n f -possible basalt Shallow refusal to digging with the backboe ,,forrwaed on a relatively flow layers. Rmult.S of swill -consolidation testing P 3 indicate undisturbed sample of the sandy low clay matrix, presented on t to o compressib�y under existing mols�re condittor► -rWisdon d on a expaeztsion potential when wetted. Rasuits 011 obtained from the site arc presented s=ple of clayey gravel 0MI us 5 inch fxactwn) Fig. 4. No free water was observed in the pits at the time of excavation and the sons were dighly moist to moist• the subsoil conditions end �� � the Foundation Reconitm ►fcof � prop�os d constv,wtion, wc exploratory pits and th ootin s laced on the undisturbed natural so31 designed for ce 'Tb lciay =at soils coc f g P pressure of 3,000 psi for s<tp1�� t of tILe proposed entiaT w,,ta h should aluated at the time of have some setdementlheave pwill be difficult and may require ro� GaII$livct%xt. Excavatto>a is the bard basalt rocitof 16 excavating equipment or blasting. Footings should be ai nd loosed gibed soils ches for continuous walls and 2 feet for ngCIDlumnl wi tho excavation should be removcd encountered at the foundation big the anuiar soils. snd zhe foo'tiU,g beaz�g level extended dower should be backFili>rd w �. � mPacted Voids created by the remflval oi� large rods structural fill. or with concrete. !Exterior footings should Place�maat ofr f t 10 provided Witt' adequate a`• covet above their beam elevations for �o�Y � d in area.- Contiunous founds l� 42 ivahes below the exterior Bade' is typ a-saumin walls should be reinforced top �,d. bottom to span gins local anomalies such as by i ulng au unsupported length of at least 12 feet- Foundadm x ed au as as valelt 3=ctures should be designed to resist a lateral earth as back 1. Foundation walls 0, fluid unit weight of at least 50 pcf for the on -site a9sive eA�] resist lateral loads can be designed for a sliding coefftient of 0,45 and a p pressure of 350 pcf equivalent fluid pressure, gloor blabs. 'The natural on -site soils, exclusive of topsoil, are suirable to support ligwy loaded slab -on grade construction. The seubgr o� should be eviland replaced ated foT pc,tecum -Pa' aiasive clays which may need to b r zn strut oral xp structural fill- To reduce; s];►e effects o€ same d;,fFerea e� � �jQt, floor ints wlL;ciiballo i� be separated from afl bearhzg walls and anitut;<w xP unrestrained -vertical rrioveimenx. Floor slab controjoints r 3o��spar-inge=d slab C damage due to shr'snkage craWang. '� requireme>`ience and fi17e reinforcement should be established by the designer based on a el should be plat N intended slab use. A IWiilm layer of fr�e T material sht�al�l consist o his beneath basement level slabs to fat}lir�se drairtag . M. U�-Jul-ZuuZ 11:1Dam From -Slifer Smith & Frampton Divide Sales Off T-201 P-005/011 F-462 07/03/2002 09:32 FAX a709264857"__�, numatl l&D.Llesiu J . MAI JUL- =15 H-P GEOTECH Stuumit Habitats November 30, 2001 Page 3 misms Z inch aggregate with) less titan 50 % passingt1�e No. 4 sieve "ate less than Z% passing the No- 200 sieve. 1 All fal. materials Ior suppor ttsitY floor slabs should be Compacted to at least 95 % Ourn. Re �uired fIll =aximtun standud Proctor at a moisttara conte.r� near t+pei3>a sari consist of the on site pr*Mb3Xdy 'soils devoid of vegetating, topso$ oversized rock, Underdrain Syste»: A11hugh free watef was not encountered durlug our_ aTloratio , ' it has been our experience mOtmtainous areas that local perched groundwater can develop dulriug times of h ivy PrecipitauQII or ucaol -mmeW be ow gmde rozen ground d spring runoff Can create a etched coon. W construction, such as retaking watts, crawlspace and basement areas, be protected frrn wetting and hydrostatic pressura buildup by arc underdrain syslGem- The drains should consist f drainpipe placed in the bot= of the wall backfill sounded above the inve level with fre urre-&mjujggnuujar waterW. The dry should be placed at each le el of excavation and at Imst 1 foot below lowest adjacent finisb grade and sloped at mintrUm 1 9ro to a suitable gMMY outlet. Free -draining granular material used in a =&rdrain system should corm less than 2% passing e No. 2fl0 sieve, less than 5 % passing the No. 4 sievo and have a maxbnum size Of 2 inches, The drain gravel bac�ll should be at least 1;h feet deep. Surface age: Thu fp1lowing drainage precautions should be observed during construction and main d at all ftes after the residence has been completed: the toQndatioa ex�vatio>Qs and tmderslab areas sliould ie 1) inundation h avoided d hig cons(raction. Z) Exterior b cki' U should be adimted to near optimum moisture and � compacted to at least 95 % of the maximum stanWd proctor density m Pavement d slab areas and to at least 90% of the maximum standard. Proctor deity in landscape areasPref &ainin ed all ba kfill s ou be Capped �vAI about 2 feet of the on -site, surface W26r initration. 3) The gro surface surrowoding the exterlox of the building should b sloped to ai n away from the foundauau in all directions- We ; reeomme a ini�un slope of 12 inches in the t rst LQ feet in unpaved areas anminimum. slope of 3 inches in 'cite first 10 fect in pavesn ti, � e�t and walk ay areas. 4) - Roof dowbspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the IhmiV of all baci4l. I,gnaita'iiolus: This stud has been conducted iu accordance with generally accepts geotecWcd engineerini principles and practices in this area at this time. We ma a no H-P G TccH 03-Jul-2002 11:10am From -Slifer Smith & Frampton Divide Sales Off T-201 P-006/011 F-462 07/03/2002 09:32 FAX 97UH25465l��_ P. 86�11 3UL-03-�ta0� 05=16 H—P GE©TECH .SUU31t it Habitats November 30, 2001 page 4 ubuiIIIII warranty either expressed or jmpi ed. The conclusions and recommendaeX red t t1 3n this reporC are based upon the data obtain®d tom the- explo Ito �Aproposed � e Of ia�Qns indic�d ou Fig. 1 arA to the depths s awn gs elude interpaia o and construction, andour e-Penenee in the area. O the exploratory its wd extrapolation of the subsurface coudiiddons be nme evident =61 x vadon is varaatioo hi the subsurface condor y construction appear dif cretnt from those performed. If conditions =aunmred during described. in his report, we should -be notified at once so re-evaluation of the recommendations may be made. d for the exclusive use by our client for cieaiga purposes. This report has been prepare others of 01= inforonacion, As We arc. not rasponsible fat technical 3hterpxetatiou� by field services durim the project evolves, we, should provide coutinued eansutloa% u¢ reeda3nmeadatians constriction to review and Iaa�or the nmplemeIltariate2 feted. significant des: vets that the recommendadow have been approp Y i erP changes may require addido-nat analysis or madiftcatio to the zeeommendadpn$ 'VYe recommend on -site observation of oft Sandi � �toru presented herein. bearing strata and testing of stcucturaX f77] by a repres etaglueer. if you have any questions or if we may be c f 'further assistance, please let us kuow. Sincerely, HEpWORTII - pAWLA• rEOTF_CHNICAL, INC. 3ordy Z. Adamson, Jr., P-E. Reviewed by: Danicl E. Hardin, P-E. TZA/ksw attachments H-P 03—Jul-2002 11:10am From —Slifer Smith & Frampton Divide Sales Off T-201 P.007/011 F-462 07/03/2002 09:33 FAX 9709264853r_'�, bumAll anai-Ln_LLY _ JUL—O:s-2002 09116 H—P CEOTECH P . 217/11 APPROXIMATE S 1" � 40' PROPOSED DRIV5VVAY ^��� .i / � 1 w- / � / / PIT 3 p50 :___ ] Z:F1PIT 5 9080 PIT 2 /� PROP055D / RESIDENCE / ` 9070 9050 � f / PIT 1 x / LOT 5 / / / / , I 9040 PROPOSED / / / / / / / 9030 BUILDING / / / f / / / 1 oe ENVELOPE / / / / / /9021 LOT 6 101 748 ROIF ERTr 9050LINE // / ell 9070 / 9040 �' 1 9060 9050 2030 9020 HE'PWORTHwPAWLAK LOCATION OF EXPL_CRATORY PITS Fig. I GEOTECHNICAL. INC_ __ 03-Jul-2002 11:10am From -Slifer Smith & Frampton Divide Sales Off T-201 P.008/011 F-462 07/03/2002 09:33 FAX 9709264tib•;_1 awumii nnuiso�.s _ JUL-03-2002 09:17 HJG�DTECH _) P.06/11 PIT 1 PIT 2 PIT 3 PIS 4 PIT 5 ELEv.�. 9486' ELEV.= 9037' ELf;V.= 9082, ELEV.- 908'l' ELF-V.= 9074' fl 0VA a ' m +41-72 y_ --I —zoom72 a's wGS3.0 l l DC-103 .r7 M _t 10 1D LEGEND: TOPS094 sandy day, orgoplc. moist, dark brawn to black. BASALT COBBLES AND BOULDERS (GM); sandy ciay matrix, dense, slightly moist, brown, possible s basalt flow layers. 27 Diameter hand driven timer sample. E Disturbed bulk sample. TPmrtieal digging refusal with backhae. NOTES: 1_ Exploratory pits were excavated on November 14 and 15, 2001 With a backhom 2. Lowtions of exploratory pits were measured approximately by Pocing front features an the site Plan proAded. 3. Elevations of me exploratory pits were obtained by irjterpolation between contours on the site plan provided. 4. 'The exploratory pit locations acid elevations should be considered accurate only to the deg ee implied by the method useti. 5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory fit logs represent the approximate b ndnrles between material types and trons[iions may be gradual. 6. No free water wag encountered In the pits at the time of excavating. Fluctuations in watel level may occur with time. 7. Labaratory Testing Results: WC = water content (� ) DO = Dry Density ( paf ) 44 — Percent retained on No. 4 sieve --200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve 101 748 HE:PWORTH—PAWLAIK LOGS OF EXPLORATORY PITS Fig. 2 GEO•FECH N I CAL, INC. M.I 03-Jul-2002 11:10am From -Slifer Smith & Frampton Divide Sales Off 07/03/2002 09:33 FAX 970926483 a SU4'AIT F1-ABITAT5 JUL-23--2002 09:17 H-P CEOTECH T-201 P.009/011 F-402 I y P . 09/11. upon-, 3 4 MoMure content = 13,0 Dry Denslity - 103 Sample of Sandy Clay Matrix From: Boring 5 at 5.5 Feet percent pcf APPLIED PRESSURE — k0 101 748 HEPWORTH—PAWLAK J SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS GEOTECHNICAL, INC. 100 Fig. 3 UJ-JUI-ZUUZ ll:llam From -Slifer Smith & Frampton Divide Sales Off _ U7/U3/ZUUZ UU;44 rAA uiuvc,u%o a1` ....,.,.�� JUL-03-2002 - a 0 O z m T-201 P-011/011 F-462 P.11/11 nnw� u�in INN loss i ISDS Permit # ai A2 3- 02 Inspector Date CO/2:1' ISDS Final Inspection P ` Completeness Form ✓ Tank is 2 gal Tank Material Tank is located ft. and oil degrees from G&"U,��'• _ Tank is located 7 % ft. and 300 degrees from Tank set level. ' ank lids within 8" of finished grade.— 111510 3 Size of field ft2 e47 units lineal ft. Technology Cleanout is installed in between tank and house(+ 1/100ft). 3 o a0 -(+ "T" that goes down 14 inches in the inlet and outlet of the tank. Effluent filter on outlet- tes or No Inlet and outlet is sealed with tar tape, rubber gasket etc. Tank has two compartments with the larger compartment closest to the house. _ Measure distance and relative direction to field. Depth of field off, =3 ft. J Soil interface raked. Inspection portals at the end of each trench. Proper distance to setbacks. 'Chambers properly installed as per manufacturers specifications. (Chambers latched, end plates prope installed, rocks removed from trenches, etc.) FSplash plate(s) installed at least in first trench inlet. Type of pipe used for building sewer line 5W' leach field Other Inspection meets requirements. Copy form to installer's file if recommendations for improvement were suggested. ACTION TAKEN: Setbacks Well Potable House Property Lake Dry Tank Drain Field Water Lines line Stream Gulch Field 100 25 20 10 .50 25 10 Tank 50 10 5 10 50 10 * 10. C H 2223-02 Tax #2107-201 02-001 JOB NAM"r Lot #5, Block 1, "Fil:ing._35„.-.-MEYER, 672 Webb Peak, Cordillera JOB NO.6P- Z1 J BILL TO DATE STARTED l DATE COMPLETED DATE BILLED a �� _ : � �--'s/_. tvou.lCJ� v�-��^.2_ r ,,� c� ✓'�f `'� l�3�C� Sol-( " 5 c l w G li( !�6 <���7 ✓ Y+'� SPiYL" (� ' f��r� Goy �i�J-e �P h� Gas JOB, COST SUMMARY 4- _ TOTAL SELLING -PRICE ` Ityy TOTAL MATERIAL 00 TOTAL LABOR Cf y 2t"1' B -1 U�v� �d S t C9 6 5� � v� �� e e � o► L INSURANCE Y o t l Imo. e. S o, L _r 6 l Y e U_ e e c SALES TAX Gv G N o v an c e of 0-1- M ISC. COSTS C' fd 05c�� rc 5� 5 �- Sc 7-ke $07'15 C1b9er-e Ge cHN(c dQ i✓j_% a c. TOTAL JOB COST 15's-e � S�`. a� GROSS PROFIT a J '6 0 rf , , ^� l �' — LESS OF SELLING PRICE 3(1Ci s 1 rti�Sr� ,,Jw �7/�y, ��� NET PROFIT JOB FOLDER Product 278 so, JOB FOLDER 0. Printed in USA Recycled Content 10% Post -Consumer PC 223-02 Meyer LF 11/5/03 iot 57 block 1 filing 35 Cordillera 672 Webb, Peek, Edwards . �mk 0 223-02 Meyer LF 11/5/03 of 5, block 1, filing 35 Cordillera 72 Webb Peak, Edwards LA 223-02 Meyer LF 11/5/03 of 5, block 1, filing 35 Cordillera 72 Webb Peak, Edwards tea. .;„ff,:, ■ s I 94M A+ fo r /, jr 9_ 1C-71 ­3 ."14qtms 0 0 , Zko elwrl�- 7 'two- V, vo m 'YAt,p �.1 "<clga�.,nout 2 dojgnout 1 • 2223-02 Meyer LF 10/29/03 672 Webb Peak, Edwards Lot 5, block 1,-,fliling 35 G`erdillera It* --ch panout 2 ilk i,-i AL if t A deanout 1 -YAW-- 91111t: 1110 ilk 2223-02 Meyer LF 10/29/03 672 Webb Peak, Edwards Lot 5, block 1,-,fliling 35 A,r 1, No�--0 �o L 04 co J C..) i a / M Alff A I » I :- • y Y! , } h- i A 2223-02�ey'er LF 1T�J�/6i Lot 5, block 1, filing 35 Cordillera 672 Webb. -Peak, Edwards -k snout 2 2223-02 Meyer CF 10/29/03 Lot 5, block 1, filing 35 Cordillera 672 Webb, -Peak, Edwards 11 . r lei anout