HomeMy WebLinkAbout37 Elk Pl - 210518302007 - 1211-92ISINDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PERMIT EAGLE COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION P.O. Box 179 - 500 Broadway • Eagle, Colorado 81631 Telephone: 328-8755 YELLOW COPY OF PERMIT MUST BE POSTED AT INSTALLATION SITE. PERMIT NO. 1211 —9 2 Please call for final inspection before covering any portion of installed system. OWNER:._limo_thy & Catherine Hebert omPHONE: 926-2006 MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 1 1 8 City: Vai 1 State: CO zip: 81658 APPLICANT: Tim Hebert PHONE: SYSTEMLOCATION: 0037Elk P12cn TAX PARCEL NUMBER: 2105-183-02-007 LICENSED INSTALLER: Bill 1 Ewing LICENSE NO: 63-92 DESIGN ENGINEER OF SYSTEM: INSTALLATION HEREBY GRANTED FOR THE FOLLOWING: 1 500 GALLON SEPTIC TANK ABSORPTION AREA REQUIREMENTS: SQUARE FEET OF SEEPAGE BED 1125 SQUARE FEET OF TRENCH BOTTOM. SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS: Install inspection portals in each trench. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH APPROVAL- DATE: r� CONDITIONS: 1. ALL INSTALLATIONS MUST COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMEN OF THE EAGLE COUNTY INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM REGULATIONS, ADOPTED PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GRANTED IN 25- 10- 104. 1973, AS AMENDED. 2. THIS PERMIT IS VALID ONLY FOR CONNECTION TO STRUCTURES WHICH HAVE FULLY COMPLIED WITH COUNTY ZONING AND BUILDING REQUIREMENTS. CONNECTION TO OR USE WITH ANY DWELLING OR STRUCTURE NOT APPROVED BY THE ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENTS SHALL AUTOMATICALLY BE A VIOLATION OF A REQUIREMENT OF THE PERMIT AND CAUSE FOR BOTH LEGAL ACTION AND REVOCATION OF THE PERMIT. 3. CHAPTER IV, SECTION 4.03.29 REQUIRES ANY PERSON WHO CONSTRUCTS, ALTERS OR INSTALLS AN INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM TO BE LICENSED. FINAL APPROVAL OF SYSTEM: (TO BE COMPLETED BY INSPECTOR): NO SYSTEM SHALL BE DEEMED TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE EAGLE COUNTY INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM REGULATIONS UNTIL THE SYSTEM IS APPROVED PRIOR TO COVERING ANY PORTION OF THE SYSTEM. r1 INSTALLED ABSORPTION OR DISPERSAL AREA: �� SQUARE FEET. VIA. 3Q iA J � J'' 1 / INSTALLED SEPTIC TANK: �v 0 GALLON o_ DEGREES _ FEET FROM 4 +ttO / ®y1,TS�� '� A W (Tr-�,,_ goJ4 SEPTIC TANK ACCESS TO WITHIN B" OF FINAL GRADE AND PROPER MATERIAL AND ASSEMBLY J YES _ NO COMPLIANCE WITH COUNTY / STATE REQUIREMENTS: 71(_ YES _ NO ANY ITEM CHECKED NO REQUIRES CORRECTION BEFORE FINAL APPROVAL OF SYSTEM IS MADE. ARRANGE A RE -INSPECTION WHEN WORK IS CORRECTED. COMMENTS: e ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH APPROVAL: y DATE: ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH APPROVAL: DATE: (R -INSPECTION IF NECESSARY) RETAIN WITH RECEIPT RECORDS APPLICANT/AGENT: ���'�hJ� OWNER: PERMIT FEE /j/). ��� PERCOLATION TEST FEE �/ V !—J RECEIPT # _93 U� CHECK # 74 3 y rv11y aua, be Accepted (Site Plan MUST be attached) r r ISDS Permit # -� Building Permit # a21� APPLICATION FOR INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PERMIT ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH OFFICE - EAGLE COUNTY P. O. BOX 179 EAGLE, CO 81631 328-8755/927-3823 (Basalt) PERMIT APPLICATION FEE $150.00 PERCOLATION TEST FE MAKE ALL REMITTANCE PAYABLE TO: EAGLE O�NTY REASUP.SRrrr�r��e�r�rx PROPERTY OWNER: ` , "41y, MIJ eytl MAILING ADDRESS: P.0. ` t)y (Ig Vkt L I CD $lKe PHONE: 924o -?,U06 APPLICANT/CONTACT PERSON: rA ef-r- .PHONE : q24-ZGi'3(n LICENSED SYSTEMS CONTRACTOR: ��(► �w��49 PHONE: 9 Z(-- Z1'7V COMPANY/DbA: ADDRESS : PERMIT APPLICATION IS FOR: (j NEW INSTALLATION ( ) ALTERATION p LOCATION OF PROPOSED INDIVID AL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM: ( ) RE. AIR Legal Description: Lute ( Mrs Su�di u�si Lof 17 Tax Parcel Number: Xsl�_ . � - 0 �1_ ()C) % Lot Size': acre. Physical Address: b037 EGk P1_&G6 CdwN-d!� Co BUILDING TYPE: (Check applicable category) ( Residential/Single Family Number of Bedrooms 5 ( ) Residential/Multi-Family* ( ) Commercial/Industrial* Number of Bedrooms Type --._ TYPE OF WATER SUPPLY: (Check applicable category) ( ) Well ( ) Spring ( ) Surface (�J Public Name of Supplier: ' per- eVQ *These systems require sign by a Registered Professional Engineer SIGNATURE: Y(7kYt�t*yCk*YCX**YfkT �1kYcYr*x*7rY[NC*Y AMOUNT PAID: S TIME LOG: TRAVEL: Date: yl YC Yt YC Y! YC iC YC y[ Y * �,TC YC �K 'lC * yC SIC N * YC YC YC 7k Y: vc Yf Yr YC Yc 7[ 7k ]k 7t Y[ YC * YC RECEIPT DATE: C CHECK =r :-1� LA CASHIER: P E R CR C : ---- FINAL: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT (303) 323.5 730 EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO December 10, 1992 Timothy & Catherine Hebert P.O. Box 118 Vail, CO 81658 500 BROADWAY P.O. BOX 179 EAGLE. COLORADO 31631 FAX (303) 323-7207 RE: Final of ISDS Permit No. 1211-92, Lake Creek Meadows Subdivision, Lot 17, Block 6, 0037 Elk Place Parcel # 2105-183-02-007 This letter is to inform you that the above referenced ISDS Permit has been inspected and finalized. Enclosed is a copy to retain for your records. This permit does not indicate compliance with any other Eagle County requirements. Also enclosed is a brochure regarding the care of your septic system. Be aware that later changes to your dwelling may require appropriate alterations of your septic system. If you have any questions regarding this permit, please contact the Eagle County Environmental Health Division at 328-8755. Sincerely, Brenda Henderson Office Assistant Environmental Health /bh ENCL: Information Brochure Final ISDS Permit cc: Files BP# 4921 ---------- Y�y Inter-1 0"ntain En teerintLtd. November 23, 1992 Tim Hebert P.4. Box 116 yail, co Re: Percolation Test Lot 17, Block 6, Lake Greek Eagle County, Colorado Project No. 927240 Dear Mr. Hebert: dub f U2 NOV 255 '922 16:07 At Your request on November 22, 1992 we performed a percolation test at Lot 17, Block 6, Lake Creek Meadows, Eagle County, Colorado, in accordance with the Eagle County Regulations for Tndividual Sewage Disposal Systems. The percolation test was perf armed on three test holes dug prior to the testing and presoaked on November 21, 1992. The test holes were located behind the house at the base of the steep bank. The percolation test results were as follows: Ho 1 16.4 min/inch t 25.7 min/inch 12.9 miry/inch The average percolation rate is 18.3 min/inch. This rate is in compliance with the Eagle County Individual Sewage Disposal System of between 5-60 Minutes per inch. The Perci>lat~ion test tholes were located in close proximity to Test Pit No. 1 of the Soils and Foundation Investigation for the Proposed rest -fence on ]Got 17, Block 5, Lake Creek Meadows, dated May 199o, project xo. 90180G. The soil profile of Test pit No. 1 Consisted of 3 feet of topsoil, undei�lain by 4 feet of brown, slightly moist clayey SAND with gravel. Sax NO.978 • Avon, Colorado 81620 + 949-5072 Deaver 893-1531 1420 Vance Street + Lakewood, Colorado 80215 • Phone: 232-0158 ddn F'06 NUU 25 ' 92 16:07 Mr. Tam Hebe:.t Page 2 November 23, 1992 Tf the leachfield is located on another part of the lot, additional testing might be required. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, Luiza Petrovska, Project Engineer LP:jlo PERSON CALLED: h A�E. �I'?S- TIME- 0 AC .0 r,Jrp/� / r/• /+° rI ,.r �,. -. "." Ja�ej•,r�-- •-'t�l• ~ � .,, � a'' 1 `! � / ,. "`. r r r / / / r/ f i r r• • '� •, / r f " ," a "^7llb 1r 1/, / / ►' ,,. " a' F .,. r r '^ � �'711 f �+/d /I // Jf r•a� r'y� yrr+ //r �..'°"•rp'! �, ' ' Syr" ..•� Arr" .••,� �. '�� /// //r r/rr / �/ d/ f, t+i r d//F .+�'g�aj�i� ",r•'"°,�•""f�" .•.:15:. 19T1r'/' I r/ /f rr r r/ // r/ / / / / t f / yr•• '� iPbr,� p.,,,�.r_+�*h r 1 ♦ /1 r/ r/ r/ rr ♦r r / �` // i` pF J /r . / r'" � �-" " "�•.v"�'� _7�4 r" r / / / r r r r / I r r _ ". f op M ♦I /r ,f �r r'/ J/ /I r/ /r f/ 01 of 771/ A% rf !//'r �/ f•' ra` r/ /f r / ,/ l �' rp!/ Ir •' 1'1 A� "'7eMr• d ./ / / '" / ♦ /r ri/r' �.•'_'.•-'^.✓ / l ' �!/ / I �/ '"/ // r/ r/ '• /r6 .r��" .1�/r`• e�• •� dI rI �� Q .1 „� 7a/Lr 'ea* I'.1 r•r /+"'� /1 rr d1 rw' 1� r '.`•=i�.1 �`1/' i �,/ r"r s lass.' pf th Yate,,"' !� r a r /r Ile A1°r '/' w / .. / 1 /rr ,. r �,r�..•"^ �p' � �7 ~a++ ' +�:. :'' •a�'18sg,r r+' r a/ aarf/ •'r t/ rr ,.�' r/ `r1r' A 11_Ly ��: -i�sti .:'. 79 L}r / r• * •-/ / I P a� r' �� ar• r d•/ `. r� '• .p'I+r ''\ ,�'6t• to law&114 i4 lrya r / r / r .-'~ r °• /' �"p/,,.- / ` - � ' 7ft8.f ,... "..., �71i MI r 78 �a r S r .r a° 4pFti ®t Ql s CF.'•E N` � ,,rl/,�1: +L�d�f 'f'4kM4 1ry}• .... •.,. .. ,�. _ --- .,._.� .�1� 47407pry /„/ A a !70' IL •, ,au. s i SCALE IV Ly. 6,7 T 03 bra_ Y.a.V3.ACV 3.a363HT 0 F-B •S3 •T Z 0 Minter -Mountain MEngineeringLtd. SOILS AND FOUNDATION INVEST IGA'1'1(--)N FOR PROPOSED RESIDENCE LOT 17, BLOCK 6, LAKE CRREK MYAWWS EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO PROJECT NU. WIbUU MAY 1990 Box No, 978 s Avon, Colorado 81620 * 9,49-5072 Denver 893-1531 1420 Vance Street • Lakewood,. Colorado 80,215 a Phone: 232-0158 36 ISZ3 1 CONCLUSION'S SCOPE SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION SITE INVESTIGATION SUBSURFACE AND GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATIONS SLAB CONSTRUCTION GROUNDWATER AND DRAIN SYSTEM REINFORCING BACKFILL AND SURFACE DRAINAGE LANDSCAPING MISCELLANEOUS 'PEST LOCATION SUMMARY OF TEST PITS GRAIN -SIZE DISTRIBUTION CHART PERIPHERAL DRAIN DETAIL 1 1 1 2 3 4 4 5 6 7 7 B 8 Drawing No. I Figures No. I & 2 Fisure No. 3 Figure No. 4 ... r....... E o d JNI S I.LW3AaV ,LU3SEH* wdSc : T o ZS '92 'T T 1 ' , Subsoil 4ondi ti.ons are fairly uniform over the site with 3 to 4 feet or topsQii. underlain by Sranu.Lar roils ^onaistin8 of clayey Haled with gravel anti clayey gravel with wand to the 11.E feet, maximum depth explored of 2• The P'roPosed residence should be founded on the undisturbed granular soils on conventional spread footings designed for a maXimum sail bearing Pressure of -Soo psf. This report presents the results of a Solis and Foundation Inveatigation for the proposed residence to be Constructed on Lot 17, bl©ck Lake Creek Meadowe, Eagle County, Colorado. The investigation was prepared by meana of test pits and laboratory testing of samples obtained tram these ]pits. The purpose of this foundation exPlorEation was to determine the various soli profile components and the engineering characte.riatics of the foundation materiala, and to provide criteria for use by the design engineers and aroh.itects in preparing the foundation design. The site is a 1.74 acre lest on Elk place, south of Edwards, Colorado. 1n the area of the test pits the lot slopes at t 0 a Oiwi181XVZAaV XWER3HIT 0 F-16 I575 2 approximately 20 Percent. Drainage is to the northwest, Vegetation (-consisted of small a-spen trees, grasses and underbrush. (R The field investigation performed on April 21, 1990. consisted of excavating, logging and; sampling two test pits. The locations -of the test Pits are shown on Drawing No. 1. The test pits were excavated with a conventional backhoe. Laboratory samples were obtained at aelected intervals by bulk sampling. Summaries of the test pit lags are detailed can Figures No. 1 through 2. The samplsa obtained during the field investigation were returned to our laboratory, inapected and classified in accordance with the Unified Soil Clsasification System and the teat Pit 1093 were edited as necessary. To aid in the aoile encountered, and to determine general sail T characteristics, selected laboratory teats (Atterberg limits, grain size distribution) were performed on representative soil and bedrock ssmplea. A summary of the test results is shown on Figure No. 3. Goa 0"I 8I.Y.M3A aV .5.:3M8RH* vase : T o Z6 'S2 'T T 3 1EIZAC ANb :ir7faNpAfigpr►r,�rnr��u� Reefer to the aummary of test pits, Figures No. 1 and 2. Subsurface u0ndi.tions are fairly uniform. Three to tour fast of topsail wes underlain by granular nails consisting of clayey sand with, gravel and ciayey gravel with sane: to the maximum depth explored of 11.5 fe®t. The granular soils were in a farm condition arld cobbles and boulders Were encOuntered in both test Fit:. No overlat grading has been drone prior to this inveatigation. No groundwater was encountered in anv of the teat pits at the time Of excavation. Indexes to Geolagical Mapping, )Eagles County, Colorado, prepared by Charles S. Robinson & Ansociatea, Inc., in 1975, states that soils in this area may contain minerals in Variable amounts that produce serioua detrimental effects on concrete, metal or other substances that are in contact with the soils. Type IS cement should be used in al! concrete that will be in contact with the mail. These maps also state that soils in this area may be subject to subsidence due to hydrocompaotion in low density soils. The underlying bedrock is Eagle Valley Evaporite, which contains water Soluble salts. Solution of these gaits oan produce sinkholes and general area subsidence-. There are sinkholes and subsidence areas in the Edwards area. Where were 90'a JMI S I.LUMAaV .LUZBZH* rniaee~ : To 36 19Z •T T no Sinkholes observed at the site at the time of the investigation. oitLl7.�,T$1,I TS?N No specific deaiZgn data has been Provided, but for the Purpose of this analysis, it has been Frenulned that the proposed residence will consist of two floors and a walkout basement, and that loads will be light. if the ProFoaed residence differs significantly from this understanding, a review should be made after the plans are more complete. T. = Topsoil and granular soils will be encountered in the foundatior, excavation. The proposed residence should be founded on conventional tyFe spread footings designed for a maximum soil bearing pressure of 2500 pef. 'At this pressure, settlements are anticipated to be less than one inch. The footings should be constructed on the undisturbed granular soils. The footings excavations should be smooth, free of debris, organics, loose soil, frost, and standing water. Any over- excavationa should be backfilled and compacted to 100 percent within 2 percent of optimum moisture as determined by a standard Loa CHI BIJL.UZA IV ,LUZBZH* pjaee : To 2:6 192 'T T Proctor teat (ASTH D-698). A representative of this office should be i--orr.tacted to inspect the foundation excavatiann t. verity that the soil conditions are the same as those arntici.Pated in this report. The bottom of the footings should bo Placed a minimum of 48 inches below final grade for frost protection.. Voids left by the removal of oobb.lea in the bottom of the footing excavation should be filled with learn concrete or a granulmr soil with a ma;fimum part jo l e si.e of a inches compacted to 106 Percent of standard Proctor denai tY (ASTM L'-658) within 2 Percent of Optimum moisture content. All, excavations made for the foundations must be backfilled with suitable material compacted t¢ a minimum of 95 percent of 'the maximum standard Proctor density (ASTM D-688). The on -sites soil, e�ol'usive ©f tog9oil and particles Greater than 6 inches, is suitable for use as fill. Before the backfill is Placed, all water and la©se debris should be removed from these excavations. Prior to the construction of concrete floors, the undisturbed aubgrade ahould be Proof compacted with a loaded rubber -tired lvad*r we a uniform high density. Spacial, care should be taken in areas where underground utilities have been i"A stalled . e0a I-LU3ACV .LW3a3H* pza6c : T 0 36 Is ,I i The floor slabs shouid be rainforoerl. and joints should be s Provided at the ,junctions of the slab and the foundation walls, so that a small amount of independent movement can recur without causing damage. The slabs should be scored in accordance with the American Concretes Inst,itute's recommendations to control oracking. A granular mat, (-3/4 inch, less then 15 percent passing No, (,)U sieve) should be provided below the floor slabs. Thia should be a minimum of four inches in thickness and compacted. The Purpose of this granular mat is to provide a capillary bz•eak between the subgrade and the slab. G 0 INDWAT& While no ground water wraa encountered at the time the field 'n"Stigation was conducted, it is Possible that seasonal, variations will cause fluctuations, or for a water table to be Present in the uPper soils during the spring months, or after a prolonged period of rain. The granular soils contain clay size particles that will inhibit free drainage. A foundation Perimeter drain as detailed On Figure No. 4 is recommended to reduce the risk of hydrostatic pressure on below grade walls. 6Oa 0HIS1XW3R0V XV333H* 1AZ36C : T 0 3E 'S71 1T T 7 HEINEURCIN The foundation should be well reinforced and rigid enough to withstand differential, settlementa. Foundation walls retaining party should be designed to reaist an equivalent fluid pressure of 40 pcf for an "active' case assuming a level drained backfill. condition. FiAG3fI'7 .; . A t ISA" Baokfill should Consist of granular soils. Clay or silt soils (ASTM 2487) should not be used as backfill material. Backfill should be moistened or dried to near ite optimum moisture content and compact®d to at least 90 percent of the maximum standard Proctor density. 'Structural baokfil,l should be Compacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum standard Proctor density. Surface water running toward the structure from upslope areas should be diverted around and away from the building by means of drainage 6walea or other similar measures. The final grade should have a positive slope away from the foundation walls on all sides. A minimum of 12 inches in the first 10 feet is recommended. Down aFouts and sill cocks should discharge into splash blocks that extend beyond the limits of the backfill. The use of long downspout, extensions in place of ePlash Mocks is advisable. . 0 T d :?ATISI.L�33RGtaf ,L�i3S3i3� rnta�� T� �� —�2 T T Leo not instal, sprinkler systems next to foundation wails. If sprinkler syatem,s are inatalled, the sprinkler heads should be Placed sa that the spray from the heads, under full pressure, does not .fall within five feet of foundation walla. Landscaping and lawn irrigation must be controlled, MI SICE U FO r: The .recommendations Provided herein are based on experience in the area and from the onaite field eXPloration, The information obtained from the field exploration and laboratory testing reflecta subsurface conditions only at the specific locations at the Particular tunes designated, Subnupfmra conditions at other 100ations and times May differ from the . conditions at these locations. The extent of any 'variations between the teat Pits may not appear evident until excavation is performed. However, only minor variations are expected. If during construction conditions appear to be different, this Office should be advised so re-evaluation of the recommendations may be made. Thia report has been prepared for the excluxaive use of Ellen Schmitt for the specific application to the proposed residential structure to be located on Lot 17, Block 6, Lake Crook Meadows, Eagle County, Colorado. i 1T a.. .. VNI S IXV3A0V ,I,'fit3$3H* wage : T o 36 '92 'T T 9 The findings and recommendations of this report have bee,, prepared in accordance with locally accePted professional engineering standards ,for similar conditions at this time. There is no other warranty, either expressed or implied. Sincerely, INTER -MOUNTAIN ENGINEERING, LTD. r Jj�'! . i / t4 �;hristopher Bittner Geologiar, Reviewed By: 11 P.E. rv% 3 T a VHz S XXW3AaV XM383H* zAja6C : T o 36'93 •T T N.T.S. Lot 13 LOT 17 ® Pit 1 i Lot 19 Pit 2 ELK PLACE Lot 16 1 TEST LOCATION PROPOSED RESIDENCE LOT 17, BLOCK 6, LAKE CREEK MEA)OWs EAGLE COUNTY, COL,ORADO AL FOP. ELLEN SCHMITT o �� M06ftr Mn, 901800 WWI vwm* Mal 3 ONI'SIX f3^Aavxv3s3H Irrlt3G E To ?S .93 -T t P1T A10. 1 F OElCRt�TICUf Gr UMMMI TOROTL (t�sio�eness "-"`T varies j clayey SAND (SCE With gravel Eotrolu of 'hest Fit at No Groundwater F felt encountered SUMMARY OF 7EST PITS PROPOSED RESIDENCE ,LOT 17, BLOCK b, LAKE CpZEK MEADOWS EAGLE COUNTY, COLOWO FOR ELLEN SCM(ITT Ate mmk! t a. _ tr. i�t I 3 S. si A ti +�d► .L i 3 e 3 H IAI a 6 C PIT /W. 2 DCPTW th peirr TOPSOIL (thickness varies) 9 T T T 0 T T e Foundation Wall Backfill moistened compacted 3eatextile (!haft 140N or equivilant) Polyethelene Moisture Z •.. Minimum of 6" of - Barrier glued to foundation 3/4 inch gravel wall 4" diameter perforated rigid pipe eloped a minimum of 1/8" Per foot to serer lateral subdrain, sump pump or daylighted DETAILS OF PERIPHERAL DRAIN SYSTEM FOR FOOTING TYPE FOUNDATION FIGURE j — 12.11-92 - Parcel #2105-183--02--007, Lake Creek Meadows Subdivision, 0037 Eik Place Re-bL- � JOB NO. ono nnnTinw, BILL TO DATE STARTED DATE COMPLETED DATE BILLED ALZ�- J /�25 h� S (S t -/"�y JOB COST SUMMARY TOTAL SELLING PRICE TOTAL MATERIAL TOTAL LABOR INSURANCE SALES TAX MISC. COSTS TOTAL JOB COST GROSS PROFIT LESS OVERHEAD COSTS OF SELLING PRICE NET PROFIT JOB FOLDER Product 278 ®@ NEW ENGLAND BUSINESS SERVICE, INC., GROTON, MASS. 01471 JOB FOLDER Printed in USA 0 1057-91 TxPrcl#2105-183-02-007 JOB NAME _ Lot 17, Block 6, Lake Creek Meadows JOB NO. JOB LOCATION r BILL TO DATE STARTED ` DATE C MPLETED DATE BILLED JOB COST SUMMARY TOTAL SELLING PRICE TOTAL MATERIAL TOTAL LABOR INSURANCE SALES TAX MISC. COSTS TOTAL JOB COST GROSS PROFIT LESS OVERHEAD COSTS % OF SELLING PRICE NET PROFIT JOB FOLDER Product 278 J�p NEW ENGIAND BUSINESS SERVICE, INC., GROTON, MA 01471 ,JOB FOLDER v Printed in U.S.A. t now _t .60 T NI vol I