No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAbout26 Lariat Ct - 210505401005 - 1209-92IS - 2019 Cleaning ReportINDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PERMIT EAGLE COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION P.O. Box 179 - 500 Broadway • Eagle, Colorado 81631 Telephone: 328-8755 YELLOW COPY OF PERMIT MUST BE POSTED AT INSTALLATION SITE. PERMIT NO. 1209 Please call for final inspection before covering any portion of installed system. OWNER: John Poukish PHONE: 926-5057 MAILINGADDRESS: P.O. Box 2697 City: Avon State: C0 zip: 81620 APPLICANT: PHONE: SYSTEM LOCATION:0026 Lariat Court Edwards, CO TAX PARCEL NUMBER: 2105-054-01-005 LICENSED INSTALLER: John Poukish LICENSENO: 59-92 DESIGN ENGINEER OF SYSTEM: INSTALLATION HEREBY GRANTED FOR THE FOLLOWING: 1000 GALLON SEPTIC TANK ABSORPTION AREA REQUIREMENTS: SQUARE FEET OF SEEPAGE BED 426 SQUARE FEET OF TRENCH BOTTOM. SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS: 12 infiltrator units. Install inspection portals at end Of each trench. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH APPROVAL: a DATE: 1, CONDITIONS: 1. ALL INSTALLATIONS MUST COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE EAGLE COUNTY INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM REGULATIONS, ADOPTED PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GRANTED IN 25. 10- 104. 1973, AS AMENDED. 2. THIS PERMIT IS VALID ONLY FOR CONNECTION TO STRUCTURES WHICH HAVE FULLY COMPLIED WITH COUNTY ZONING AND BUILDING REQUIREMENTS. CONNECTION TO OR USE WITH ANY DWELLING OR STRUCTURE NOT APPROVED BY THE ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENTS SHALL AUTOMATICALLY BE A VIOLATION OF A REQUIREMENT OF THE PERMIT AND CAUSE FOR BOTH LEGAL ACTION AND REVOCATION OF THE PERMIT. 3. CHAPTER IV, SECTION 4.03.29 REQUIRES ANY PERSON WHO CONSTRUCTS, ALTERS OR INSTALLS AN INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM TO BE LICENSED. FINAL APPROVAL OF SYSTEM: (TO BE COMPLETED BY INSPECTOR): NO SYSTEM SHALL BE DEEMED TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE EAGLE COUNTY INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM REGULATIONS UNTIL THE SYSTEM IS APPROVED PRIOR TO COVERING ANY PORTION OF THE SYSTEM. �y INSTALLED ABSORPTION OR DISPERSAL AREA: 7 1 a SQUARE FEET. vex �j INSTALLED SEPTIC TANK: `J'�©0 GALLON � / 0a DEGREES y ` i9 FEET FROM SEPTIC TANK ACCESS TO WITHIN 8" OF FINAL GRADE AND PROPER MATERIAL AND ASSEMBLY YES —NO COMPLIANCE WITH COUNTY/ STATE REQUIREMENTS: YES _NO ANY ITEM CHECKED NO REQUIRES CORRECTION BEFORE FINAL APPROVAL OF SYSTEM IS MADE. ARRANGE A RE -INSPECTION WHEN WORK IS CORRECTED. COMMENTS: 14 f�n Y Fri! �t i� fz'a- _` 74 16-1 ..f'el IIC In i ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH APPROVAL: ��/ DATE: A�2 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH APPROVAL: DATE: (RE-INSPECTI NTF NECESSARY) RETAIN WITH RECEIPT RECORDS APPLICANT / AGENT: �z A,, A � �� + �/ OWNER: �{ �✓C7 A n � `I � t S t ®� PERMIT FEE 1,50-" PERCOLATION TEST FEE '' (d rpW'RECEIPT# 311-3 � CHECK# N OU 17 1992 ISDS Permit # to EAGLE COUNTY 4.'Buiiding P r it # It I 91 u-s Or tAe-91 . COMMUNITY DEU)PlaE�tl�,TION FOR INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DI (I STEM PERMIT ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH OFFICE- EAGLE COUNTY P.O. BOX 179 EAGLE, CO 81631 328-8755/927-3823(Basalt) PERMIT APPLICATION FEE $150.00 PERCOLATION TEST FEE $200.00 ************************************************************************** PROPERTY OWNER: zo A'�/ Po `,L lc-l' -T7 P MAILING ADDRESS: 60)( 0? [ -/ APPLICANT/CONTACT PERSON: 6 k , 10o u /C rS � PHONE. S 7 LICENSED SYSTEMS CONTRACTOR: -J-(D Ati P®ram �C <`3 ADDRESS: Ao x CO (616 ;ZO PHONE • 9,Z G "5-0 -7 PERMIT APPLICATION IS FOR: (,) NEW INSTALLATION ( ) ALTERATION ( ) REPAIR LOCATION OF PROPOSED INDIVIOUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM: Legal Descript Parcel Number: Physical Address: 04& Zgt,;¢:� 0�,� BUILDING TYPE: (Check (l Residential / ( ) Residential / ( ) Commercial / TYPE OF WATER SUPPLY: applicable category) Single Family Number Multi -Family* Number Industrial* Type_ of Bedrooms of Bedrooms Well( ) Spring ( ) Surface ( ) Public f v Name of Supplier: *These systems require design by a Registered Professional Engineer NOTE: SITE PLAN MUST BE ATTACHED TO APPLICATION MAKE ALL REMITTANCE PAYABLE TO: "EAGLE COUNTY TREASURER" SIGNATURE• DATE: AMOUNT PAID: /�,�(, 6C-) RECEIPT# '73 V_3 DATE: CHECK # CASHIER: +° do c, 4 GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION PROPOSED SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE LOT R2, SOUTH FORTY SUBDIVISION EDWARDS, COLORADO PREPARED FOR: JJP COMPANIES, INC. P.O. BOX 2697 AVON, CO 81620 PREPARED BY: SUMMIT SOILS P. O. BOX 1957 Dillon, CO 80435 (303) 468-1989 JOB NO. 920083 OV 17 1992 EAGLE COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT OCTOBER 5, 1992 TABLE OF CONTENTS GENERAL PAGE 1 PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION AND SITE CONDITIONS 1 SUBSOIL CONDITIONS 2 FOUNDATION - SPREAD FOOTINGS 2 FLOOR SLAB CONSTRUCTION 2 DRAIN SYSTEM 3 FOUNDATION WALLS 3 BACKFILL AND SURFACE DRAINAGE 3 LAWN IRRIGATION 4 DESIGN CONSULTATION AND CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION 5 TEST PIT LOCATION FIGURE 1 TEST PIT LOG 2 LABORATORY TESTS ATTACHED TYPICAL DRAIN DETAIL ATTACHED M W Z P 1; This report presents the results of a subsoil investigation conducted at the site of a proposed single family residence to be located at Lot R2, South Forty Subdivision, Edwards, Colorado. The investigation was made to determine the best types and depths of foundations, allowable soil bearing pressures, ground water conditions and any special precautions which should be taken in the design or construction of the residence due to soil and ground water conditions. The conclusions and recommendations presented are based on the data gathered during the site investigation, on the results of the laboratory testing and on our experience with similar soil conditions. Factual data gathered during the field and labora- tory work are summarized on the attached figures. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION AND SITE CONDITIONS The proposed structure will be a two to three story wood frame structure with slab on grade, walkout basement and a reinforced concrete foundation. At the time of the investigation, September 28, 1992, the lot was vacant, and covered with scattered grasses and sage. The building site as positioned is approximately three to four feet higher in elevation than the adjacent road. The lot consists of a small ridgeline which has a slight downward slope to the west with the east side leveling off to a terrace. The north side slopes downward steeply to the north to Highway 6, while the south side slopes moderately downward to Lariat Court. -1- SUBSOIL CONDITIONS As shown on the Test Pit Log, Figure 2, foundation soil conditions encountered were a sandy gravelly silt. Free water was not encountered during the investigation. However, adequate precaution for drainage around the structure should be provided. FOUNDATION - SPREAD FOOTINGS The building should be founded on footings placed on the lower natural gravelly silt soils. The footings should be designed for a maximum soil bearing pressure of 2250 PSF. The bottom of the footings should be a minimum of forty inches below final grade for frost protection. Footings should be proportioned as much as possible in order to minimize any differential settlement. The recommended minimum footing width is fourteen inches with a minimum pad size of eighteen inches. Differential movement is estimated at one-half to three-quarter inch. SLAB CONSTRUCTION The natural soils that will support slabs are stable. How- ever, the builder should realize that irregularities resulting in excavation may require backfill to provide a level subgrade. The backfill may consist of onsite excavated soils (minus two inches) compacted to a minimum density of 90% ASTM D-698 Proctor Density. To minimize any possible damage that could be caused by move- ment, the slabs should have a positive separation from all bearing members and utility lines to allow their independent movements. Frequent joints should be scored in slabs to control the location of any cracking (maximum 200 square foot areas). -2- DRAIN SYSTEM No free water is expected in the excavation. However, the foundation and lower level living space will extend into the hillside and may become a water trap. The source of water could be from excessive irrigation and/or poor surface drainage accumulating in backfill areas with subsequent seepage to foundation depth. A drain system must be provided around the uphill portion of the structure below the bottom of footing grade. It should be possible to daylight the drain system to the lower topography of the site. We should be called to inspect the soils exposed in the excavations to verify the details of the drain system. FOUNDATION WALLS Backfilled foundation walls which act as retaining walls should be designed to resist an equivalent active lateral fluid pressure of 42 PCF, with an equivalent passive fluid pressure of 375 PCF and a coefficient of friction for sliding of 0.35. These parameters assume full height drain for backfilled sections. (Refer to "Typical Drain Detail".) BACKFILL AND SURFACE DRAINAGE The foundation soils should be prevented from being wetted after construction. Generally, this can be accomplished by insuring that the backfill placed around the foundation walls will not settle after completion of construction, and that -3- the backfill material is relatively impervious. The backfill material should be free of trash and it should be moistened and compacted to between 85 and 92% ASTM D-698 density. Only enough water should be added to backfill material to allow proper compaction - do not puddle. The final grade of the backfill should have a positive slope away from the foundation walls on all sides. A minimum fall of twelve inches in the first ten feet away from the foundation is recommended. Down spouts and sill cocks should discharge into splash blocks that extend beyond the limits of the backfill areas. Splash blocks should be sloped away from the foundation walls. Particular care should be taken to compact disturbed natural soils and any fills placed to support sidewalks, garage and driveway slabs. LAWN IRRIGATION A sprinkler system should not be installed next to founda- tion walls. If a sprinkler system is installed, the sprinkler heads should be placed so that the spray from the heads, under full force, does not fall within 5 feet of the foundation walls. Lawn irrigation should be controlled. Lawns, flowers, shrubs, etc., planted within 5 feet of foundation walls should be hand watered, and this water minimized. -4- DESIGN CONSULTATION This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of pro- viding geotechnical design criteria for the proposed project in accordance with generally accepted soil and foundation engineering practices. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made. In the event that any changes in the nature or design of the project are planned, the conclusions and recommendations contained in this report shall not be considered valid unless the changes are reviewed and conclusions of this report modified or verified in writing. It is recommended that the project geotechnical engineer be provided the opportunity for a general review of final design and specifications in order that earthwork and foundation recommend- ations may be properly interpreted and implemented in the design and specifications. In any geotechnical investigation, it is necessary to assume that subsoil conditions do not vary from those encountered in the test pits. Our experience has shown that these variations exist and that they become apparent in the foundation excavation. For this reason, we should be called to inspect the foundation exca- vation prior to foundation construction. Please contact us when further consultation or inspections are necessary. The fee for additional consultation or inspection is not included in the fee for this report. Respectfully submi ted, 4ti4 a : �s Walter O. Schultz P. E. 9695 SUMMIT SOILS 'a • • NAL - 5 - TEST PIT LOCATION LARIAT LOT R2, SOUTH FORTY EDWARDS, CO 9/28/92 SUMMIT SOILS P.O. BOX 1957 DILLON, CO NO SCALE FIGURE 1 SUMMIT SOILS P. O. BOX 1957 DILLON, CO 80435 (303) 468-1989 TEST PIT LOG LOT R2, SOUTH FORTY SUBDIVISION EDWARDS, COLORADO PIT #1 0 - 6" TOPSOIL & VEGETATION 6" - 2' SANDY SILT, MEDIUM COMPACT, DRY, BROWN 2' - 8' SANDY GRAVELLY SILT, MEDIUM COMPACT, DRY, BROWN NO FREE WATER ENCOUNTERED COMPOSITE SAMPLE TAKEN AT 2 - 8 FIGURE 2 PROFILE HOLE LOG LOT R2, SOUTH FORTY SUBDIVISION EDWARDS, CO 0 - 6" TOPSOIL AND VEGETATION 6" - 2' SANDY SILT, MEDIUM COMPACT, DRY, BROWN 2' - 9.5' SILTY SAND, MEDIUM COMPACT, SLIGHTLY MOIST, BROWN NO WATER NOR EVIDENCE OF WATER TABLE OBSERVED SEPTEMBER 28, 1992 SUMMIT SOILS P.O. BOX 1957 DILLON, CO 80435 (303) 468-1989 1 1 19/28/972 O 0 N O W 0 _N xuz cn O LLJ `O W 0 NO 0 � tuz z Q c w (n N O LO Lq N n- O o0 � 11 zi O F-N U U W o Ui rn --D U z z � N O J a I C) Q W O cn � O o- w J Q Q o d' O O O O O O O O O O O O O co � O � �t r) N 1HOI3M J.8 ONISSdd 1NK�J3d m LO N J LiJ Q N CD d' O O O O O O O O O O O O O co � O � �t r) N 1HOI3M J.8 ONISSdd 1NK�J3d m LO N J LiJ Q N CD RESULTS OF SOIL PERCOLATION TEST LOCATION OF PROPOSED SYSTEM: 7 LOT : L-/t-BLOCK: SUBDIVISION: / DATE OF TEST: 912 y J 1 PRE-SOAK FROM: �` c' TO /�'/11. C < <�' S',-/ Time ate (Time) D:ite HOLE #1 J AVERAGE MPI TIME DIAMETER G' le, / ✓/Y /r D lE,PTH TYPE OF SO I L LaATER DEPTH TO START HOLE # 2 y: AVERAGE MPI_] TIME E I AMETER,_ r� DEPTH TYPE OF SOIL jl4eY/ WATER DEPTH TO START /4/-!" HOLE #3- 67 � AVERAGE MPI l*rw121 DIAMETER 6 �/0�?//`� DEPTH 3611 TYPE OF SOIL. 7-Y Sf1H/� VAT A ER DEPTH _ 0 START INCHES OF FALL INCHES OF FALL INCHES OF FALL I EW 8, o / 0, v RATE SOIL PERCOLATION RATE MPI R F3-IA RK S : flog' IV f' /�'!+..�"i7: �� � N .1'///�,E'T�> `�! /f►7 F' U/=�'✓-' .lo/�,� Fy/-:Ly/ i'rr��� /� y ./✓/' ✓`'lL'_�vii7'/�'_..6�'_LT- _�Lr't/c/+i��/+� irS /�`y�y�:.rwir7�' LOCATION OF TEST HOLES: y L n� f=lLlF Buz O �;^ •�, ! •Y 1969i 12;7912 -Lot R-2, Filing 1, South Forty, 6 Lariat Court, Poukish JOB NO. JOB LOCATION BILL TO DA E STARTED DATE COMPLETED DATE BILLED r q a j - >, , 7 -12- JOB COST SUMMARY TOTAL SELLING PRICE TOTAL MATERIAL TOTAL LABOR INSURANCE SALES TAX MISC. COSTS TOTAL JOB COST GROSS PROFIT LESS OVERHEAD COSTS % OF SELLING PRICE NET PROFIT JOB FOLDER Product 278 NEW ENGLAND BUSINESS SERVICE, INC„ GROTON, MASS. 01471 JOB FOLDER Printed In U.S.A. v �p r � r. .� •11 .y J.' a�i� ✓ � ` : _ � '.� �'.^ - y, b- i'ti�Ew�� � -:.�• � � :.�• �[ j. � y • �t t ti.. :!�.� ;� . 1 2 3 3 C 2 Z_ FL' LAI !D,!9 1 figs tIZ04-n- /sov�-P�.� t-2/m/.fa, iS �J / a Dti f�,1 R , h'l� ti-� •7; -7, s eaa /t �JS Ja(S oo -r- R-3 / F to whin 4/41 coNs,srcF > \ Lot7c,vwoo l \ S \ \ \ of S Roc/ �%►iS / / \ �g2� \ ,Wilk \ • '\ \ cl, NNI, R-7 co3 / GRAPHIC SCALE 30 0 15 30 60 IN FEET 1 inch — 30 M 120 RECEIVED EAGLE COUNTY COMIINI INITY GEVELOMMENT 1GtECOUNTY Eagle County OWTS Systems Cleaners Reporting Form NOTE: Required to be submitted to Environmental Health within 10 days of cleaning an OWTS syltem Systems Cleaner Company License Number Email Address (5& 6����CSQ.AA _ Phone Service Technician CoR�U`Y 1--X�1\11 tS Phone cau -6 Tax Parcel # Address of Service(_Q L-Q�-" ca- [ L TECA\ O Y(� Person Requesting Service ��—` }-`— Phone. Cq'-1U�-� Property Owner Phone�C��,�- Septic System Permit Number n ���� T Tank Size _---15 Date of service Tank Material Sewage Disposal Site General Condition and Functionality of the System Recommended Repairs W /AZ Site sketch showing location of the septic tank access lids measured from at least 2 fixed points (Photos Encoi h Signed Date