No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPiney River Ranch - 194512400008INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PERMIT EAGLE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH P.O. Box 179 - 550 Broadway • Eagle, Colorado 81631 Telephone: 328-7311 or 949-5257 or 927-3823 YELLOW COPY OF PERMIT MUST BE POSTED AT INSTALLATION SITE. PERMIT NO. 1 U 5-:,9 Please call for final inspection before covering any portion of installed system. OWNER: DENVER WATER BOARD/VAIL ASSOCIATES PHONE: 303-628-6000 MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 7, Vail, CO 81658 AGENT: PHONE: SYSTEM LOCATION: Piney River Ranch, 6 miles north of Vail LICENSED INSTALLER: Ewing Construction LICENSE NO. 17-91 DESIGN ENGINEER OF SYSTEM- Alpine Engineering P.O. BOX 97 Edwards CO 81632 INSTALLATION IS HEREBY GRANTED FOR THE FOLLOWING: AS PER ENGINEER DESIGN SYSTEM GALLON SEPTIC TANK OR GALLON AERATED TREATMENT UNIT. DISPERSAL AREA REQUIREMENTS: SQUARE FEET OF SEEPAGE BED SQUARE FEET OF TRENCH BOTTOM. SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS: Permit issued for construction of Phase I and II. PHASE I OF THIS PROJECT IS LIMITED TO WINTER RECREATIONAL USE ONLY. Full scale use of this facility is not permfttPd until completion of Phase TT Pprmif will no receive final approval until completion of Phase II. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH OFFICER: fI& DATE: /d_7 �i CONDITIONS: 1. ALL INSTALLATIONS MUST COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE EAGLE COUNTY INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM REGULATIONS, ADOPTED PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GRANTED IN 25-10-104, C.R.S. 1973, AS AMENDED. 2. THIS PERMIT IS VALID ONLY FOR CONNECTION TO STRUCTURES WHICH HAVE FULLY COMPLIED WITH COUNTY ZONING AND BUILDING REQUIREMENTS. CONNECTION TO OR USE WITH ANY DWELLING OR STRUCTURE NOT APPROVED BY THE ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENTS SHALL AUTOMATICALLY BE A VIOLATION OF A REQUIREMENT OF THE PERMIT AND CAUSE FOR BOTH LEGAL ACTION AND REVOCATION OF THE PERMIT. 3. SECTION 111, 3.21 REQUIRES ANY PERSON WHO CONSTRUCTS, ALTERS OR INSTALLS AN INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM TO BE LICENSED ACCORDING TO THE REGULATIONS. FINAL APPROVAL OF SYSTEM: (TO BE COMPLETED BY INSPECTOR): NO SYSTEM SHALL BE DEEMED TO BE IN COMLIANCE WITH THE EAGLE COUNTY INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM REGULATIONS UNTIL THE SYSTEM IS APPROVED' PRIOR TO COVERING ANY PORTION OF THE SYSTEM. INSTALLED ABSORPTION OR DISPERSAL AREA: SQUARE FEET. INSTALLED SEPTIC TANK: GALLONS DEGREES FEET SEPTIC TANK CLEANOUT TO WITHIN 8" OF FINAL GRADE, OR: PROPER MATERIALSAND ASSEMBLY YES NO COMPLIANCE WITH COUNTY/STATE REGULATION REQUIREMENTS: YES NO ANY ITEM CHECKED NO REQUIRES CORRECTION BEFORE FINAL APPROVAL OF SYSTEM IS MADE. ARRANGE A RE -INSPECTION WHEN WORK IS COMPLETED. COMMENTS: ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH OFFICER: DATE: ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH OFFICER: DATE: (RE -INSPECTION IF NECESSARY) RETAIN WITH RECEIPT RECORDS PERMIT APPLICANTIAGENT: OWNER: AMOUNT PAID: RECEIPT #: CHECK #: CASHIER: APPLICATION FOR INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PERMIT 7 ENVIRONMENNTAL HEALTH OFFICE - EAGLE COUNTY Number: 147 P. 0. BOX 179 EAGLE, COLORADO 81631 949-5257 Vail 328-7311 Eagle 927-3823 Basalt. PERMITAPPLICATION FEE $150.00 1 PERCOLATTOfl TEST FEE S125.00 NAME OF OWNER: DENVER WATER BOARD MAILING ADDRESS: 1600 West 12th Ayp- Denizer,M A0954 PHONE: 3o3-628-6o00 NA11E OF APPLICANT (If different from owner): VAIL ASSOCIATES. INC. ADDRESS: P.O. Box 7, Vail, CO 81658 PHONE: 9h��[7F,_5hf11 DESIGN ENGINEER OF SYSTEM (If applicable): ALPINE ENGINEERING. INC.. ADDRESS: P.O. Box 97, Edwards, CO 81632 PHONE: 3o3-926-3373 PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR INSTALLATION OF SYSTEM: EWING CONSTRUCTION LICENSED INSTALLER: (x ) YES ( ) h0 ADDRESS: P.O. Box 941, Avon, CO 81620 PHONE: .926-2379 PERMIT APPLICATION IS FOR: ( x) NEW INSTALLATION ( ) ALTERATION ( ) REPAIR LOCATION OF PROPOSED INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM: Physical Address: pTNEy RTVFR RANCH, 6 miles due north of Vail Parcel Number: Lot Size: 68.3 acres +/- Legal Description:01/? SE 1/4 Section 12,_T4S, R81W, 6th p_M_ Fag],g. County, cn BUILDING OR SERVICE TYPE (Check applicable category): Residential - Single Family ( ) Residential - Fourplex ( ) Residential - Duplex ( x) Commercial (Type) Kitchen. Public Restroom Residential - Triplex + shower & washer for 12 employees NUMBER OF PERSONS: NUMBER OF BEDROOMS: WASTE TYPES Check applicable categories): Commercial or Institutional ( ) Dwelling ( ) Non -Domestic Wastes ( ) Transient Use ( ) Garbage Disposal ( x) Dishwasher or hand wash ( x ) Automatic Washer (clothes) ( ) Spa Tub ( X ) Other (Specify): public restroom. ki_tch-nfac;1;t3, shower for 12 employees TYPE OF INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PROPOSED: x Septic Tank Composting Toilet ( ) Incineration Toilet ( ) Vault Privy ( ) Greywater ( ) Chemical Toilet ( ) Pit Privy ( ) Aeration Plant ( ) Recycling, Portable Use ( ) Other ( ) Recycling, Other Use WILL EFFLUENT BE DISCHARGED DIRECTLY INTO WATERS OF THE STATE: ( ) YES ( x) NO IS SYSTEM DESIGNED FOR LESS THAN 2,000 GALLONS PER DAY: ( ) YES ( x) NO WATER CONSERVATION PLAN: 1.6 gallon flush toliej x) YES ( ) NO NOTE: The Environmental Health Office may reduce the required absorption area upon approval of an adequate water conservation plan. SOURCE AND TYPE OF WATER SUPPLY: (x ) Well ( ) Spring ( ) Creek/Stream Give d f all wells wi hin 200 feet of system: to be a i11ea If s pl' by it ater ive name of supplier: — SIGNATURE - DATE: INFORMATION BELOW TO BE FILLED OUT BY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH OFFICER: GROUND CONDITIONS: Percent ground slope Depth to Bedrock (Per 8' profile hole Depth to Groundwater table SOIL PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS: Minutes per inch in Hole #1 Minutes per inch 1n Hole r2 Minutes per inch in Hole #3 FINAL DISPOSAL BY: Absorption Trench, Bed or Pit ( j Above Ground Dispersal Under Ground Dispersal ( ) Other Evapotranspiration ( ) Sand Filter ( ) Wastewater Pond PIOUNT PAID: RECEIPT NUMBER DATE: CHECK NUMBER CASHTFP- NOTE: SITE PLAN MUST BE ATTACHED TO APPLICATION. MAKE ALL REMITTANCE PAYABLE TO: "EAGLE COUNTY TREASURER". (Environmental Health Dept. - Rev. 4/88) ALPINE ENGINEERING INC May 21, 1991 Mr. Roger Hosea Eagle County Environmental Health P.O. Box 179 Eagle, CO 81631 RE: Piney Lake Septic System Dear Mr. Hosea: Please find attached, the Eagle County, and State application for site approval of a septic system, $150.00 application fee, and plans for the proposed Piney Lake septic system. INTRODUCTION Vail Associates has recently leased the Piney Lake property from the Denver Water Board, and desires to improve the existing facilities at the site, for use as a summer recreational guest ranch. Activities would include boating, fishing, horseback riding, picnicking, hiking, etc. Vail Associates also intends to maintain the winter snowmobiling activities at the site. The use of the restrooms would be limited during the winter. Vail Associates would like to have the Ranch upgraded and operational by June 20, 1991, and will begin construction as soon as the permits are obtained. Existing facilities by the previous operators of the site include a kitchen and dining facility, stables, corrals, various sheds and storage buildings. Two outhouses or pit privies previously provided for the disposal of sanitary wastes for the area. It is my understanding that a holding tank was located outside the kitchen, which was pumped to a truck and removed from the site on a regular bas is. Vail Associates proposes to improve the existing kitchen, provide a grease trap, and discharge the kitchen wastes to the proposed septic system. PROPOSED USE Vail Associates plans on up to a maximum of 300 group guests using the Ranch on a daily basis (arrive about 10:00 A.M. by bus from Vail, and 90% of the guests are expected to leave by 8:00 P.M.). In addition, it is expected that about 150 people will visit Piney Lake, not part of the organized guests mentioned above. It is expected that these visitors will stay for a period for 2 to 4 hours. Edwards Business Center • P. O. Box 97 . Edwards, Colorado 81632 . 303/949-4640 9 303/926-3373 4 A maximum of 1 meal per day will be served to the 300 group guests, and it is expected that up to 50% of the 150 daily visitors will eat a meal. Approximately 20 employees will be needed to operate the Ranch. A maximum of twelve (12) employees will live at the Ranch, and 6 to 8 employees will drive up from Vail every day. A private restroom is proposed for the 12 full time employees, where 4 showers, 2 water closets, 4 sinks, and 1 clothes washer is proposed. The public restroom is to provide 6 water closets, 3 urinals, and 6 sinks, total. SEPTIC SYSTEM OPERATION The septic system, restrooms, and water system is to be operated and maintained by Vail Associates, who, as the owners and operators of the Vail and Beaver Creek ski areas, has competently operated facilities of similar nature. PERCOLATION TEST/SOIL PROFILES On Monday, May 6, 1991 Brad Foster of Vail Associates and I went to the Piney Lake site to dig percolation test holes and (2) two soil profile holes. The site was covered with 2 to 4.5' of snow, except where snowcats had removed snow. The ground was not frozen, probably as a result of snow cover. The percolation test holes were pre -wetted and covered with insulation to keep from freezing. The soil profile holes were dug at the low points of the proposed leach field area, to a depth of 8 feet. The soil appeared to be a well graded, uniform consistency, sandy loam. No groundwater was observed in the pits when they were dug, or when we left the site, or when the pits were observed the next day. On Tuesday, May 7, 1991, percolation tests were performed on 7 percolation holes. Results are as follows: PERCOLATION RATE, HOLE MINUTES/INCH 1 1 2 6.7 3 3 4 5 5 5.5 6 6.9 7 14.7 Avg = 6.11 min/in TREATMENT ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED A subsurface, lined sand filter, and septic tanks, are proposed to treat the sewage generated from the proposed restrooms and kitchen. Absorption trenches were considered, but require too large of minimum horizontal distances to locate the leach fields on the site. An evapotranspiration field was considered, however, adequate area is not available on the site. 3 BURIED. SAND FILTER DESIGN The purpose of the sand filter is to treat the effluent, before discharging the effluent into the ground. As discussed with Duane Watson of the Colorado Department of Health, if the sides of the sand filter are lined with a waterproof membrane, all of the effluent discharged to the field must go through the sand filter, and is not allowed to percolate through the sidewalls of the field. Once the effluent passes through the sand filter and is treated, it is acceptable to discharge into the ground. The proposed treatment allows the system to be classified as a "Lined Sand Filter". FILTER MEDIA A sieve analysis has been taken on two samples of the sand from test pits #1 and #2. Preliminary results indicate the sand has a uniformity coefficient of less than 4, and an effective grain size near .25 mm. Additional tests are to be run, to determine the availability of on site filter media. If needed, sand will be hauled in for the top foot of the sand filter, to insure a uniform filter media. DOSING AND FILTER BED RECOVERY The sand filter is to be divided into 3 equal beds, to alternate effluent to each of the f ields and allow one of the f ields to recover, if need be. A dosing tank is proposed to flush the system 3 to 4 times per day. The dosing tank is proposed to discharge into a surge tank, which will direct the effluent to the desired filter bed. Should one field become clogged, the surge tank will allow effluent to overflow to a separate field. HORIZONTAL DISTANCES The lined sand filter allows minimum horizontal distance from the proposed well, Piney Lake, and the Piney River to be achieved. GROUNDWATER No groundwater was evident in either soil profile hole #1 or #2 on May 6 or 7, 1991. The holes were dug to a depth of 8 feet, to an approximate elevation of 9344 (#l), and 9340 (#2). The inverts of distribution pipes is elevation 9348.2, which would place the sand filter distribution lines at least 4 to 8 feet above the water table. ABSORPTION RATE OF GROUND BELOW SAND FILTER The percolation rate of the existing sand averaged 6 minutes per inch. Using Eagle County design standards for an absorption field, the size of the field is A = (Q/5)(T**0.5) A = (6670/5)(6**0.5) = 3268 SF Since the sand filter area is 6670 SF, the existing sandy material has adequate capacity to absorb the sand filter discharge. 4 SEPTIC TANK Low flush toilets are to be used in the restrooms, which will decrease the volume of effluent discharged to the sand filter. A reduction in the design flow has been proposed, (and noted in the sewage flow calculations) which will be used for sizing the lined sand filter area. The septic tank volume is to be sized without applying the reduction for low flush toilets. Sincerely, 12 C�ajt'4� Glenn Palmer, PE GP/lm Enclosure I PINEY LAKE SEPTIC SYSTEM SEWAGE FLOW CALCULATIONS 1. 12 full time employees (overnight) @ 50 GPD 600 GPD 2. Laundry, for 12 employees only, 19.5 gal washing machine 117 GPD *6 (19.5 gal)(12 people)(3 loads/person/week)/(6 day/week) 3. Kitchen, wash silverware, plates A. 300 group visitors, 6 to 10 hour visit, 1 meal served. (300 people)(3 gallon/meal)(1 meal/person) 900 GPD B. 150 day visitors, 2 to 4 hour expected visit, 50% eat a meal (150 people)(3 gallon/meal)(0.5 meal/person) 225 GPD 4'. Public restroom *1 Al. Use public park criteria *2 o W.C. = (36 gallon/fixture/hr)(65%) (6 fixtures)(10 hrs) 1404 GPD o Urinal = (10 gallon/fixture/hr)(3 fixtures)(10 hrs) 300 GPD subtotal 1704 GPD +-- use A2. W.C. _ (3 flushes/person/day)(300 people)(1.6 gallon/flush)*3 1440 GPD W.C. _ (1 flushes/person/day)(150 people)(1.6 gallon/flush) 240 GPD subtotal 1680 GPD A3. W.C. = (flush/5 minutes)(9 fixtures)(10 hrs)(60 min/hr)(1.6 gallon)*4 1704 GPD B. Sink = (6 sinks)(15 gallon/hr/sink)(10 hrs) 900 GPD Total 4446 GPD Peak flow (sand filter)*7 = 4446(1.50 peak factor) = 6670 GPD Peak flow (septic tank) = 5202(1.50 peak factor) = 7803 GPD *1 Group arrives at 10:00 A.M. and 90% are expected to leave by 3:00 P.M. = 10 hours of use. *2 Reduction for low flush toilet. (1.6 gallons per flush actual)/(3.5 gallon/flush standard) = 46% reduction factor. Use 65% reduction factor (which is less of a reduction than 46%). *3 Water use is based upon the number of flushes per visitor, independent of whether the toilet or urinal is used. Day users are expected to visit for a 2 to 4 hour period, and flush less than group visitors, on a 6 to 10 hour visit. *4 Based upon each toilet and urinal being flushed every 5 minutes, continuously for 10 hours. *5 The highest average peak use is expected to be 4446 GPD. The average use is not expected to be this high. If a peak factor of 150% is used, and a peak flow of 6670 GPD is obtained, 2556 GPD is generated from the public toilets. (150%)1704 = 2556. If 2556 is generated from the toilets, this means that each toilet and urinal must be flushed once every 3.4 minutes, for 10 continuous hours, or each of 450 patrons uses the restroom 3.6 times per day, which appears to be very conservative. A water meter is proposed to be installed on the water system to verify predicted demands. *6 The washing machine represents (117/4446) = 2.6 of the total daily discharge. o Septic tanks Provide detention for 30 hours Volume = (30/24)(7803) = 9754 gallons Provide (4) 2500 gallon tanks *7 The peak or design flow was reduced for the sand filter, for low flush toilets, but not reduced for the septic tanks. Sand Filter Area Q = 6670 GPD Application rate = 1 GPD/SF = Area = 6670 SF Provide three filter areas of equal size to alternate use. A surge tank is proposed to allow effluent to be directed to alternating filter beds, and if one bed becomes clogged, allow discharge to the other filter beds. Minimum Horizontal Distances, From Buried Lined Sand Filter Spring, wells D = 60' Lake, water course or stream = 25' Dry gulch D = 10' Grease Trap Kitchen 900 GPD, possibly over 1 to 3 hour period when washing dishes, = flow = 7 1/2 to 15 GPM Provide minimum 700 gallon storage SLO, 1. 12 full-time employees .17 lbs/pers/day = 2.04 lbs/day 2. Laundry 2 lbs/washer/day = 2.00 lbs/day 3. Kitchen (.03 lbs/meal)375 = 11.25 lbs/day 4. Public restroom Toilet (.04 lbs/fixture/hr)(6 fixtures)(10 hrs) = 2.40 lbs/day Urinal (.01 lbs/fixture/hr)(3 fixtures)(10 hrs) = .30 lbs/day Sink (.04 lbs/fixture/hr)(6 sinks)(10 hrs) = 2.40 lbs/day Total = 20.39 lbs/day PINEY LAKE SEWER SYSTEM SCHEMATIC KTC 300 GROUP VISITORS 6 1 MEALIDAY 150 DAY VISITORS ! 1/2 MEAUDAY GREASE TRAP (1) 3 COMPARTMENT 3I K (U HAND 3NIK (I) W.C. — .-TANK AND PUMP TO SEPTIC (6) wC. RE3�TROOM (6) 3W3 /LAVATOWS FORCE ' MAIN I, EMPLOYEE (?a W.C. PRIVATE RE3TROOM (4) =K3 MVATOPM (4) 0101YEM MANHOLE (1) WASM O f O SEPTIC TANKS Q a 6670 GPD O O DOSING TANKS _ SURGE & DISTRIBUTION TANK (TO ALTERNATE FLOW TO FILTER BEDS) DISTRIBUTION BOX (TYP.) BURIED L04ED SAND FILTERS APPLICATION FOR INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PERMIT ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH OFFICE EAGLE COUNTY Number: P. 0. BOX 179 EAGLE, COLORADO 81631 949-5257 -Vail 328-7311 Eagle 927-3823 Basalt PERMIT APPLICATION FEE S150.00 I PERCOLATION TEST FEE S125.00 1AME OF OWNER: DENVER WATER BOARD 4AILING ADDRESS: 1600 west 12th Ay,_ A-n.,P,-,(_'Q 80254 PHONE: 3o3-628-6non IA14E OF APPLICAt(T (If different from owner): VAIL ASSOCIATES. INC. 4DDRESS: P.O. Box 7, Vail, CO 81658 PHONE: in —ors-Shnl )ESIGN ENGINEER OF SYSTEM (If applicable): _ ALPINE ENGINEERING, INC_ ADDRESS: P.O. Box 97, Edwards, CO 81632 PHONE: 303-926-337i PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR INSTALLATION OF SYSTEM: EWING CONSTRUCTION LICENSED INSTALLER: (x ) YES ( ) h0 ADDRESS: P.O. Box 941, Avon, CO 81620 PHONE: 926-2379 PERMIT APPLICATION IS FOR: ( x) NEW INSTALLATION ( ) ALTERATION ( ) REPAIR LOCATION OF PROPOSED INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM: Physical Address: pTNEy ATygg uANcH 6 miles due north of Vail Parcel Number: Lot Size: 68.3 acres +/- Legal Description:61/a SE 1/4 Suction 12 T4S., RAIW- 6rh p_M_ Fao1e County. C.0 BUILDING OR SERVICE TYPE (Check applicable category): Residential - Single Family ( ) Residential - Fourplex ( ) Residential - Duplex ( x) Commercial (Type) Kitchen. Public-Restroom ( ) Residential - Triplex + shower & washer for 12 employees NUMBER OF PERSONS: NUMBER OF BEDROOMS: 4ASTE TYPES (Check applicable categories): Commercial or Institutional ( ) Dwelling ( ) Non -Domestic Wastes ( ) Transient Use ( ) Garbage Disposal ( X) Dishwasher or hand wash ( x ) Automatic Washer (clothes) ( Spa Tub ( x ) Other (Specify): public restroom kitchenfari1iry, shower for 12 employees TYPE OF INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PROPOSED: x Septic Tank Composting Toilet ( ) Incineration Toilet. ( ) Vault Privy ( ) Greywater ( ) Chemical Toilet ( ) Pit Privy ( ) Aeration Plant ( ) Recycling, Portable Use ( ) Other ( ) Recycling, Other Use WILL EFFLUENT BE DISCHARGED DIRECTLY INTO WATERS OF THE STATE: ( ) YES ( X) NO IS SYSTEM DESIGNED FOR LESS THAN 2,000 GALLONS PER DAY: ( ) YES ( k) no WATER CONSERVATION PLAN: 1.6 gallon flush toliej X) YES ( ) NO NOTE: The Environmental Health Office may reduce the required absorption area upon approval of an adequate water conservation plan. SOURCE AND TYPE OF WATER SUPPLY: (x ) Well ( ) Spring ( ) Creek/Stream Give depth of all wells within 200 feet of system: to be dri>>ed If supplied by community water, give name of supplier: SIGNATURE: DATE: INFORMATION BELOW TO BE FILLED OUT BY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH OFFICER: GROUND CONDITIONS: Percent ground slope Depth to Bedrock (Per 8' profile hole Depth to Groundwater table SOIL PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS: Minutes per inch in Hole #1 Minutes per inch in Hole 02 Minutes per inch in Hole #3 FINAL DISPOSAL BY: "Absorption Trench, Bed or Pit ( ) Evapotranspiration ( ) Above Ground Dispersal ( ) Sand Filter ( ) Under Ground Dispersal ( ) Wastewater Pond ( ) Other M10UNT PAID: RECEIPT NUMBER DATE: CHECK NUMBER NOTE: SITE PLAN MUST BE ATTACHED TO APPLICATION. MAKE ALL REMITTANCE PAYABLE TO: "EAGLE COUNTY TREASURER". (Environmental.Health Dept. - Rev. 4/88) MAY 03 '91 15:06 BEAVER CREEK 303 949-5750 EX3012 P.2/2 SE 1/4 SECTION 12 , TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH, RANGE 81 WEST 8th RM. --- EAGLE COUNTY enter ~ AgIIT~ SE!/4 SEQ /i' ac. 12 N 1/2 SE 1/4 SEC. 12 E 1/4 Carl 3 NOTE � N t7C ��V777 Th'%Irawin epi i the paIC#I of Ian OC ireQ 1 by WorrOn7 �ee� adated Sep ember 8 ��7v t 1y r c rdad rn fh records of the Clerk a recorder q ogle C ,34 Y in Book 218 at Page 860 on w Sctober 9 t970 . It is ba ed on the Sure u of Land Man6gement De endent Reaurvay of TC�+nshipp pgouch fPange 81 West doted I Appuguat I5,1�83 and supers des, and rQ laces I 1938 , datadr SePVembaerIt 3 r 97c� f" 7 No f Bearings are boded on the east r,ne of 'he, %`� southeast quarter of Sectipri 12 being S 0°01 00 E For Field Notes I.a .�, F etd Books 2342 Pages 54-77 HIGH WATER For and 2537 Pages I - i9 ELEV. 9442.0 I Witness N Witness Corn,.'� / Corner 0.62r from 9 1'ferrorr N iN' E s� aFr/� �,�-�T corner 78784,g48.L.M.) (a84°29�f4 Bi..M,} w 0j N Ln N V V S 1/2 SE 1/4 SEC. 12 suryby fS35.6' Dead %4 12i58.80— 8�`'M I0�4• 38 Survey k 956. 00 \\X lHE SE 114 BEC. IS 1/4 Car, p/N Y Point or Sec. 12 RIVER SE Cuing HIGH WATER � INE See. 12 ELEV.. 9442.0 / l 400 too 0 400 Soo BGAIE IN FEET LEGEND REAL ESTATE ACOUIRED BLM BRASS CAP ESTABLISHED BY1983 DEPENDENT RESURVEY BLM BRASS CAP 1961 REMONUMENTED O D.W.D. BRASS CAP AINS 68.3 ACRES f DENVER WATER DEPARTMEN' FUNNEL DOLL. SYSTE REAL ESTATE ACQUIRED FROM _ ESTATE Of E: 1rr 04 0 I DATE:SEPTEMBER Z31(, TR. I ICK. ". w r`''; UMENT DATED SEPTEMBER 28,1970 COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Water Quality Control Division 4210 East llth Avenue Denver, Colorado 80220 APPLICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL FOR CONSTRUCTION OR EXPANSION OF: A) DOMESTIC WASTEWATER TREATMENT WORKS (INCLUDING TREATMENT PLANTS, OUTFALL SEWERS, AND LIFT STATIONS) OVER 2.,000 GPD CAPACITY. B) INTERCEPTORS (IF REQUIRED BY C.R.S. 25-8-702 (3)) APPLICANT: VAIL ASSOCIATES, INC. c/o Brad Foster ADDRESS: P.O. Box 7. Vail, Co 91658 PHONE: -10-1-476-5601 Consulting Engineer's Name and Address: ALPINE ENGINEERING, INC. c/o Glenn Palmer P.O. Box 97, Edwards, CO 81632 PHONE: 303-926-3373 A. Summary of information regarding new sewage treatment plant: (SEPTIC SYSTEM) 1. Proposed Location: (Legal Description) SOUTH 1/2, SE 1A, Section 12 Township 4 SOUTH, Range 81 WEST, EAGLE County. 2. Type and capacity of treatment facility proposed: Processes Used SEPTIC SYSTEM: SEPTIC TANKS AND BURIED LINED SAND FILTER Hydraulic 667o Organic ; _ gal/day IbS. BUD 5 ay Present PE N/A Design PE N/A % Domestic 100 % Industrial 3. Location of facility: Attach a map of the area which includes the following: (a) 5-mile radius: all sewage treatment plants, lift stations, and domestic water supply intakes. NONE (NONE (b) 1-mile radius: (habitable buildings, location of potable water wells,)and an approximate indication of the topography. 4. Effluent disposal: Surface discharge to watercourse NONE Subsurface disposal see plans- Land Evaporation Other State water quality classification of receiving watercourse(s) NOT APPT.TCART.F Proposed Effluent Limitations developed in conjunction with Planning and Standards Section, WQCD: BOD5 mg/l SS mg/1 Fecal Coliform /100 ml Total Residual Chlorine mg/l Ammonia mg/l Other 5. Will a State or Federal grant be sought to finance any portion of this project? NO 6. Present zoning of site area? NOT ZONED Zoning with a 1-mile radius of site? U.S. FOREST SERVICE 7. What is the distance downstream from the discharge to the nearest domestic water supply intake? NOT APPLICABLE ame or 5uppiy (Address of Supply) What is the distance downstream from the discharge to the nearest other point of diversion? NOT APPLICABLE Name of User) (Address -of User -1- WQCD-3 (Revised 8-83) F C. If the facility will be located on or adjacent to a site that is owned or managed by a ,Federal or State agency, send the agency a copy of this application. D. Recommendation of governmental authorities: Please address the following issues in your recommendation decision. Are the proposed facilities consistent with the comprehensive plan and any other plans for the area, including the 201 Facility Plan or 208 Water Quality Management Plan, as they affect water quality? If you have any further comments or questions, please call 320-8333, Extension 5272. Recommend Recommend No Date Approval Disapproval Comment Signature of Representative 1. Management Agency 2. Loca Government: Cities or Towns site is inside boundary or within three miles) and Sanitation Districts. 3. Board of County Commissioners 4. Loca —Health ut or ty 5. C ty ounty Planning Authority 6. Council of Governments/Regionalann ng 7. State Geologist (For lift stations, the signature of the State Geologist is not required. Applications for treatment plants require all signatures.) I certify that I am familiar with the requirements of the "Regulations for Site Applications For Domestic Wastewater Treatment Works," and have posted the site in accordance with the regulations. An engineering report, as described by he regulations, has been prepared and is enclosed. .2/� �� l Brad W. Foster DATE 51 v�A CI Glenn Palmer Signature of Applicant TYPED NAME -3- WQCD-3 (Revised 8-83) May 22, 1991 Eagle County Commissioners c/o Mr. Ray Merry P.O. Box 179 Eagle, CO 81631 Dear County Commissioners, ALPINE ENGINEERING INC MAY 2 3 1991 EAGLE COUNTY CO%IMU�diTY DEVELOPMENT Vail Associates has leased the Piney Lake property from the Denver Water Board, which is located approximately 6 miles north of Vail, Colorado. Vail Associates plans to replace the existing pit outhouses at the site with flush toilets and a septic system, as discussed in detail in the attached letter. Since the system is expected to generate in excess of 2000 gallons per day, we are required to obtain state review and approval of the system, which requires your review. If you have any questions or if there is anything that we can do to help in your review process, please call. S irncerely, Glenn Palmer, PE GP/lm Enclosure cc: Brad Foster Rojer Hosea, Eagle County Department of Health Edwards Business Center • P. O. Box 97 . Edwards, Colorado 81632 •303/949-4640 • 303/926-3373 0 ALPINE ENGINEERING INC May 22, 1991 Mr. Rich Phelps Holy Cross Ranger District P.O. Box 190 Minturn, CO 81645 Dear Mr. Phelps, MAY 2- 4 10 EAGLE COUNITY CO64tMUN11TY DEVELOPPAU i Vail Associates has leased the Piney Lake property from the Denver Water Board, which is located approximately 6 miles north of. Vail, Colorado. Vail Associates plans to replace the existing pit outhouses at the site with flush toilets and a septic system, as discussed in detail in the attached letter. Since the system is expected to generate in excess of 2000 gallons per day, we are required to obtain state review and approval of the system, which requires your review. Please sign the single sheet, and return to me, at your earliest convenience. A self addressed, stamped envelope is enclosed for your convenience. Your prompt response would be appreciated. If you have any questions or if there is anything that we can do to help in your review process, please call. S inn''cerely, p C9��,�, C c-c.C.w�a-✓ Glenn Palmer, PE GP/lm Enclosure cc: Brad Foster Rojer Hosea, Eagle County Department of Health P.S. We are hoping to submit to the state health department by June 3, 1991. Your response by that time would be appreciated. Edwards Business Center • P. O. Box 97 • Edwards, Colorado 81632 • 303/949-4640 • 303/926-3373 a ALPINE ENGINEE INGINC May 22, 1991 Mr. Lane Wyatt Northwest Council of Governments P.O. Box 739 Fisco, CO 80433 Dear Mr. Wyatt, Vail Associates has leased the Piney Lake property from the Denver Water Board, which is located approximately 6 miles north of Vail, Colorado. Vail Associates plans to replace the existing pit outhouses at the site with flush toilets and a septic system, as discussed in detail in the attached letter. Since the system is expected to generate in excess of 2000 gallons per day, we are required to obtain state review and approval of the system, which requires your review. Please sign the single sheet, and return to me, at your earliest convenience. A self addressed, stamped envelope is enclosed for your convenience. Your prompt response would be appreciated. If you have any questions or if there is anything that we can do to help in your review process, please call. Sincerely, p Ir Glenn Palmer, PE GP/lm Enclosure cc: Brad Foster Rojer Hosea, Eagle County Department of Health P.S. We are hoping to submit to the state health department by June 3, 1991. Your response by that time would be appreciated. Edwards Business Center. • P. O. Box 97 • Edwards, Colorado 81632 • 303/949-4640 •303/926-3373 ALPINE ENGINEERING INC May 22, 1991 Mr. Jim Soule Colorado Geological Survey 1313 Sherman Street, Room #715 Denver, CO 80203 Dear Mr. Soule, Vail Associates has leased the Piney Lake property from the Denver Water Board, which is located approximately 6-miles north of Vail, Colorado. Vail Associates plans to replace the existing pit outhouses at the site with flush toilets and a septic system, as discussed in detail in the attached letter. Since the system is expected to generate in excess of 2000 gallons per day, we are required to obtain state review and approval of the system, which requires your review. A self addressed, stamped envelope is enclosed for your convenience. Please find attached a check in the amount of $285, payable to the Colorado Geological survey, as required for your review. Your prompt response would be appreciated. If you have any questions or if there is anything that we can do to help in your review process, please call. Sincerely, Glenn Palmer, PE GP/lm Enclosure cc: Brad Foster Rojer Hosea, Eagle County Department of Health P.S. We are hoping to submit to the state health department by June 3, 1991. Your response by that time would be appreciated. Edwards Business Center • P. O. Box 97 • Edwards, Colorado 81632 •303/949-4640 • 303/926-3373 ALPINE ENGINEERING INC May 22, 1991 Mr. Forrest R. Christie Denver Water Board 1600 West 12 th Avenue Denver, CO 80254 Dear Mr. Christie, Vail Associates has leased the Piney Lake property from the Denver Water Board, which is located approximately 6 miles north of Vail, Colorado. Vail Associates plans to replace the existing pit outhouses at the site with flush toilets and a septic system, as discussed in detail in the attached letter. Since the system is expected to generate in excess of 2000 gallons per day, we are required to obtain state review and approval of the system, which requires your review. Please sign the single sheet, and return to me, at your earliest convenience. A self addressed, stamped_. envelope is enclosed for your convenience. Your prompt response would be appreciated. If you have any questions or if there is anything that we can do to help in your review process, please call. Sincerely, 6 r Glenn Palmer, PE GP/lm Enclosure cc: Brad Foster Rojer Hosea, Eagle County Department of Health P.S. We are hoping to submit to the state health department by June 3, 1991. Your response by that time would be appreciated. Edwards Business Center • P. O. Box 97 • Edwards, Colorado 81632 • 303/949-4640 •303/926-3373 ALPINE ENGINEERING INC May 22, 1991 Mr. Frank Marugg 1499 Peak View Drive Castle Rock, CO 80104 Dear Mr. Marugg, Vail Associates has leased the Piney Lake property from the Denver Water Board, which is located approximately 6 miles north of Vail, Colorado. Vail Associates plans to replace the existing pit outhouses at the site with flush toilets and a septic system, as discussed in detail in the attached letter. Since the system is expected to generate in excess of 2000 gallons per day, we are required to obtain state review and approval of the system, which requires your review. Please sign the single sheet, and return to me, at your earliest convenience. A self addressed, stamped envelope is enclosed for your convenience. ' Your prompt response would be appreciated. If you have any questions or if there is anything that we can do to help in your review process, please call. Sincerely, Glenn Palmer, PE GP/lm Enclosure cc: Brad Foster Rojer Hosea, Eagle County Department of Health P.S. We are hoping to submit to the state health department by June 3, 1991. Your response by that time would be appreciated. Edwards Business Center • P. O. Box 97 • Edwards, CQlorado 81632 •303/949-4640 • 303/926-3373 ALPINE ENGINEERING INC May 22, 1991 Eagle County Commissioners c/o Mr. Ray Merry P.O. Box 179 Eagle, CO 81631 Dear County Commissioners, Vail Associates has leased the Piney Lake property from the Denver Water Board, which is located approximately 6 miles north of Vail, Colorado. Vail Associates plans to replace the existing pit outhouses at the site with flush toilets and a septic system, as discussed in detail in the attached letter. Since the system is expected to generate in excess of 2000 gallons per day, we are required to obtain state review and approval of the system, which requires your review. If you have any questions or if there is anything that we can do to help in your review process, please call. Sincerely, Glenn Palmer, PE GP/lm Enclosure cc: Brad Foster Rojer Hosea, Eagle County Department of Health Edwards Business Center • P. O. Box 97 • Edwards, Colorado 81632 • 303/949-4640 •303/926-3373 ALPINE ENGINEERING INC May 22, 1991 Mr. Keith Montag Eagle County Planning Commission P.O. Box 179 Eagle, CO 81631 Dear Mr. Montag, Vail Associates has leased the Piney Lake property from the Denver Water Board, which is located approximately 6 miles north of Vail, Colorado. Vail Associates plans to replace the existing pit outhouses at the site with flush toilets and a septic system, as discussed in detail in the attached letter. Since the system is expected to generate in excess of 2000 gallons per day, we are required to obtain state review and approval of the system, which requires your review. We are planning to meet with the Development Review Team on Friday May 24, 1991, and would like to be scheduled for the June 5, 1991 planning commission meeting. If you have any questions or if there is anything that we can do to help in your review process, please call. Sincerely, Glenn Palmer, PE GP/lm Enclosure cc: Brad Foster Rojer Hosea, Eagle County Department of Health Edwards Business Center • P. O. Box 97 • Edwards, Colorado 81632 •303/949-4640 • 303/926-3373 E ALPINE ENGINEERING INC May 24, 1991 Mr. Ray Merry Eagle County Health Department P.O. Box 179 Eagle, CO 81631 Dear Mr. Merry, This letter serves as a follow up to the cover letter submitted to you (or Rojer Hosea) on May 21, 1991, (also dated May 21, 1991). 1. Dosing The average flow to the septic tanks is 4446 gallons per day. The system will be designed to provide dosing 4 times per day, at 1100 gallons per dose. 2. As discussed with Mr. Ed Church of Church Engineering, the distribution pipes can be spaced at 6' maximum on center. The plans have been changed per his comments, and are attached. 3. Copies of the plans and applications have been sent to: Mr. Rich Phelps, U.S.F.S., adjacent property owner Mr. Frank Marugg, adjacent property owner Mr. Lane Wyatt, Northwest Council of Governments Mr. Jim Soule, Colorado Geological Survey Mr. Forrest Christie, Denver Water Board Mr. Keith Montag, Eagle County Planning Commission The Eagle County Commissioners (sent to you) Copies of these letters were also sent to your for your records. We would like to be on the June 5, 1991 Planning Commission meeting. We plan to meet with the Board of Health and County Commissioners on Wednesday, May 29, 1991. If you need more copies for the Commissioners please call. Operation and maintenance plan From Ed Church (to follow) Treatment alternatives In addition to the considerations noted in the May 21, 1991 letter, we have estimated the cost of the evapotranspiration system to be approximately $5 per sf(39,000 sf) _ $195,000. The evapotranspiration system is not economically feasible. Edwards Business Center 9 P. O. Box 97 • Edwards, Colorado 81632 • 303/949-4640 • 303/926-3373 ('- 1"niI"A,.*.1t c- A monitoring hole will be drilled near the proposed system, to establish the high ground water level. The bottom of the fields will be located a minimum 4' above the high seasonal groundwater table. Lease Agreement A copy of Vail Associates' lease with the Denver Water Board is attached. If you have any questions please call. Sincerely, Glenn Palmer, PE GP/lm Enclosure c sIF-A Q PC)ST ►� LEASE THIS LEASE, made and entered into this �u �� day of ,19,�, by and between the CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, acti�q by a d through its OAR OF WATER COMMISSIONERS, hereinafter referred to as"BOARD"and V�11 associates, Inc. whose address is P.O. Box 7 Vail, Colorado 81658 ' hereinafter referred to as "LESSEE", WITNESSETH: 1. PROPERTY LEASED, TERM AND RENT. The property leased hereby pursuant to the terms of this lease is described as follows (as used herein, "property leased" includes the land and any improvements thereon): For legal description, see Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof. This lease is for the term commencing on the 1st day of August,1990, and ending on the 31st day of December,1991, unless sooner terminated as provided herein, at an annual rental of Thirty Thousand and no/100 ..... • ....... Dollars ($30,000.00) payable in advance, on a semi-annual basis $15,000.00 due January 1 of each year and $15,000.00 due July 1 of each year. Plus 2% of the annual gross revenue of the preceeding year and an additional 1% of annual gross revenue of the preceeding year over $500,000.00 due on January 31 of each year. In addition, an initial payment of $12,500.00 covering the period August 1,1990 to December 31,1990, shall be due on or before August 1,1990, at the office of the BOARD,1600 West 12th Avenue, Denver, Colorado 80254. "Gross Revenues" are all gross receipts attributable to any aspect of the operation on the property leased herein before deductions for any purpose and shall include, but not be limited to, that portion of any vacation packages attributable to said operation. If during the term of this lease there shall be levied against the property leased taxes or other assessments which relate to, or which accrued during, the term of this lease, the amount of such taxes and assessments shall be added to the rental payment and the LESSEE shall pay the amount thereof to the BOARD upon receipt of billing therefor. LESSEE shall not be responsible for taxes, assessments, special assessments or any other charges which relate to or which accrued prior to the commencement date of this lease. The property leased is subject to the following easements, rights -of -way and licenses: Easements and Rights -of -way of Record. 2. RENEWAL. This lease shall be automatically renewed under the same terms and conditions for additional terms of one year each but in no event for more than three additional one year terms, except that no such renewal will occur if the LESSEE gives the BOARD written notice at least sixty (60) days prior to the anniversary of this lease or any renewal thereof that LESSEE does not desire the lease be renewed. The rental payment for such additional term shall be made at least ten (10) days prior to the renewal thereof. 3. TERMINATION. a. Either party may terminate this lease by giving the other party written notice of intent thereof at least sixty (60) days prior to the end of the original term or any renewal thereof. In the event of such termination by either party no pro•rata refund of advanced rental, if any, shall be made. b. The BOARD may terminate this lease at anytime if it determines that the property leased is necessary or useful in the operation of the water plant and system under the control of the BOARD, by giving the LESSEE six months written notice thereof, and in such case a pro-rata refund of advanced rental, if any, shall be made. c. if the rent or any part thereof, shall be in arrears, or if default shall be made in any of the covenants or agreements herein contained to be kept by the LESSEE, it shall be lawful for the BOARD to declare the term ended and enter into the said property leased, or any part thereof, either with or without process of law, to terminate the interest of the LESSEE or of any other person or persons occupying the same, and the said property leased again to repossess and enjoy, as in the first and former estate of the BOARD. if at any time said term shall be terminated as aforesaid, or by any other means, the LESSEE agrees to surrender and deliver up said property leased peaceably to the BOARD immediately upon the termination of said term, and if the LESSEE shall remain in possession after termination, the LESSEE shall be deemed guilty of a forcible detainer of said property leased under the statute, shall be subject to eviction and removal, with or without process of law. d. In the event the property leased or any part thereof shall be damaged by fire or other unavoidable casualty or disaster without any fault on the part of the LESSEE, so that the same shall thereby be rendered unfit for use or occupancy, this lease may be immediately terminated at the option of the LESSEE, and a pro-rata refund of advanced rental, if any, shall be made. (SPECIAL) roll 7-an ' 4. UTILITIES. LESSEE covenants and agrees to pay all charges for water, heat, electric power and other utilities assessed, levied or incurred on the property leased which relate to, or which accrued during, the term of this lease or any renewal thereof. LESSEE shall not be responsible for any charge for water, heat, electric power or other utility charge which relates to, or which accrued during, a period prior to the commencement date of this lease. 5. MAINTENANCE, REPAIR AND ALTERATIONS. LESSEE covenants and agrees not to make or permit to be made any significant alterations in, or additions to, the property leased without the prior written consent of the BOARD; and to keep the property leased, and all improvements thereon including, septic system, sewer, plumbing, wiring, glass and fencing in good repair at the expense of the LESSEE; to properly irrigate and care for all trees, shrubbery and the lawn upon or about the property leased; to keep the sidewalks in front and around the property leased free from ice and snow, and said sidewalks and yard free from litter, dirt, debris and obstruction; to keep the cesspool, grease traps, and ash pits clean and in a sanitary condition; and to surrender and deliver the property leased in.like good order and condition upon the expiration or termination of this lease, ordinary wear and tear and loss by fire, flood or Act of God excepted. 6. USE AND OCCUPANCY. The LESSEE covenants and agrees that he shall occupy or utilize the property leased for (See Paragraph 16) and for no other purpose and not to use the property leased or permit it to be used for purposes prohibited by the laws of the United States, State of Colorado, or any political subdivisions thereof. 7. RE-ENTRY. The LESSEE covenants and agrees to permit the BOARD or its duly authorized representatives to enter upon the property leased, at any reasonable hour of the day, for the purpose of inspecting the same, making surveys, showing the property leased to prospective purchasers or lessees and to do such other acts and things as it deems necessary for the protection of its interest therein. The permission granted by this section does not extend to closed buildings or storage areas, and the BOARD shall take reasonable precautions to ensure that any inspection or survey will not interfere with LESSEE'S business conducted on the property leased. The BOARD shall use its best efforts to give advance notice to LESSEE of an inspection or survey under this paragraph, provided however, that the BOARD shall retain the right to make such unannounced inspections as it deems advisable. 8. NOTICE. Any notice required under this lease shall be in writing and mailed by certified mail to the respective parties at the address hereinabove given. The BOARD'S Director of Administration (or his designated representatives) shall be the representative of the BOARD to accept or give any approval, notice or the like provided for hereunder. In the event LESSEE should change the address hereinabove given during the term of this lease, LESSEE shall notify the BOARD in writing of such change of address. 9. NO COVENANT OF TITLE OR QUIET TITLE POSSESSION. The rights granted herein are without covenant of title or warranty of quiet title possession of the property leased and unless expressly set forth herein no water or water rights are granted by this lease. 10. SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS. This agreement shall inure to the benefit of, and be binding upon, the respective legal representatives, heirs, successors and permitted assigns of the parties. 11. ASSIGNMENT OR SUB -LEASE. LESSEE covenants and agrees not to assign this lease or sublet any part of the property leased, other than to a subsidiary or affiliate of LESSEE with written notice to the BOARD, without first obtaining the written cons•,nt of the BOARD. 12. PROPERTY LEASED TAKEN "AS IS". The LESSEE u:.derstands and agrees that the property leased is leased "as is", and that the LESSEE is assuming responsibility for any loss, injury, death, or damage that may result from any and all defects, be they obvious or hidden, that said property leased may contain. The BOARD makes no warranty, written or implied, that the property leased is fit for any purpose or that it meets any federal, state, county or local law, ordinance or regulation applying to the property leased. Notwithstanding anything in this paragraph or lease to the contrary, LESSEE assumes no liability for loss, injury, death, or damage which occurred prior to the commencement date of this lease, and LESSEE shall not be responsible to the BOARD for such prior occurrences by way of warranty, indemnity or otherwise. 13. LIABILITY AND INDEMNIFICATION. The BOARD shall not be liable for any loss, injury, death, or damage to any person or personal property which may arise from the use or condition of the property leased (including, but not limited to, loss, injury, death, or damage resulting from ice, water, rain, snow, gas, electrical wires, fire, theft, burst pipes or plumbing failures) during the term of this lease or any renewal thereof. The LESSEE hereby expressly agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the BOARD, its officers, agents, employees and insurors against any liability, loss, damage, demand, action, cause of action or expense of whatever nature (including court costs and attorney's fees) which may result from any loss, +t I)(1. 1,, 1. ��� - !1V� i�j(%iif il'L L•�� .j;..:r::�A1 �, ill j11,Cv�Ml,i v.i<.:>tvr �..ti::�r �nti:y •.ill�.il 0liJG�•V�.1t VI UI:6 c y auSeU J reason of LESSEE'S use and occupancy of the property leased or LESSEE'S failure to fulfill the terms and conditions of this lease.This paragraph is specifically applicable, but not limited to, any goods, merchandise, chattels or any other personal property now, or that may hereafter be upon the property leased, whether belonging to the LESSEE or others. Notwithstanding anything in this paragraph or lease to the contrary, LESSEE assumes no liability for loss, injury, death, or damage which occurred prior to the commencement date of this lease, and LESSEE shall not be responsible to the BOARD for such prior occurrences by way of warranty, indemnity or otherwise. 14. RESERVATION FOR BOARD USE. This Lease is made under and conformable to the provisions of the Charter of the City and County of Denver which control the operation of the Denver Municipal Water System, consisting of Sections C4.14 through C4.35 of said Charter. insofar as applicabi, said Charter provisions are incorporated herein and made a part hereof by this reference and shall supersede any apparently conflicting provisions otherwise contained in this Lease. The BOARD reserves the right to make full use of the property leased as may be necessary or convenient in the operation of the water plant and system under the control of the BOARD and the BOARD retains all right to operate, (SPECIAL.) .2-• 5173,'7.10 maintain, install, repair, remove or relocate any of its facilities located within the property leased at any time and in such a manner as it deems necessary or convenient. 15. VENUE. For the resolution of any dispute arising hereunder, venue shall be in the courts of the City and County of Denver, State of Colorado. 16. Such use by the LESSEE shall be consistent with and subject to the use of the property by the BOARD and shall not include the right to construct roads, or remove minerals or materials or to make any significant changes in the topography whatsoever without prior written permission of the BOARD, but shall be consistent with the use for operation of a year -around recreational business for profit, which may include the operation of a youth camp, lodge, dining facility, guest ranch, camping and other recreational activities. 17. The scope and extent of any proposed activity of the LESSEE on the premises will tie set forth in writing annually and approved by an authorized representative of the BOARD prior to the LESSEE's commencing the proposed activity. Approval of proposed activity shall be deemed granted twenty (20) days after receipt of notice from LESSEE by the BOARD, absent a written response from an authorized representative of the BOARD to the contrary within such time. 18. Unless otherwise specifically approved, in writing, by the BOARD's Manager of Property Administration, the LESSEE shall provide the following insurance: a. WORKERS' COMPENSATION INSURANCE: The LESSEE shallcarryworkers' compensation insurance to cover liability under the workers' compensation laws of the State of Colorado in connection with the operations of the LESSEE performed pursuant to this Lease. b. COMPREHENSIVE GENERAL LIABILITY INSURANCE: LESSEE shall carry comprehensive general liability insurance which shall include blanket contractual liability. Such insurance shall be on a per occurrence basis with limits of $150,000 per person, $400,000 per occurrence, or a combined single limit of not less than $400,000. c. AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE: LESSEE shall carry automobile liability and property damage insurance to include owned, non -owned and hired vehicles, which are utilized in the performance of this Agreement. Such insurance shall be on a per -occurrence basis with limits of $150,000 per person, $400,000 per occurrence, or a combined single limit of not less than $400,000. The required comprehensive general liability and automobile policies shall provide that for "breach of warranty" (failure to comply with policy provision) and/or for cross liability purposes, the BOARD, as an additional insured, will be treated as if a separate insurance policy(ies) had been issued, but this provision shall not increase the limits of coverage provided by said policy(ies). The coverage provided will be primary coverage; the "other insurance" clause of any policy shall be inapplicable. The LESSEE shall provide certificates of insurance (and renewals thereof) in a fo►r1 acceptable to the BOARD, demonstrating that required coverages have been obtained. The certificates of insurance shall certify that, relative to the comprehensive general liability and automobile policies, the City and County of Denver, acting by and through its BOARD of Water Commissioners, has been named as an additional insured, for coverages only, pursuant to this Agreement, with ne premium payment obligations. The coverages specified in the certificate(s) of insurance shall not be terminated, or reduced, without providing at least thirty (30) days prior written notice to the BOARD. 19. The LESSEE shall be responsible for the maintenance of the area which shall include policing the area as maybe necessary to insure that paper, cans and all other debris do not accumulate and LESSEE shall be required to maintain the premises in a neat and sanitary condition satisfactory to the BOARD. A sufficient number of trash receptacles shall be placed on the leased area and all debris is to be removed and disposed of off the BOARD's property. 20. LESSEE shall have the right to remove all dead trees and all trees which are infected with beetle kill and have been so designated by the U.S. Department of Agriculture or the State Forest Service. 21. The LESSEE shall have the right to substitute better or improved portable buildings for the buildings now on the premises. However LESSEE is under no obligation to do so, and the portable buildings now situated on the property leased may remain on the premises. 22. Any and all improvements, equipment, etc. that are placed on the property shall be removed by the LESSEE no later than ninety (90) days after the expiration date of the Lease. All improvements, equipment, etc. not removed by ninety (90) days after the expiration date of the Lease shall become the property of the BOARD. 23. LESSEE shall comply with all statutes, ordinances, regulations, etc. that relate in any way to the use of the Property. 24. LESSEE agrees to cooperate with and comply with all lawful rules and regulations of the United States Forest Service and the Colorado Department of Natural Resources. 25. The LESSEE shall be responsive to environmental and ecological concerns as are raised by BOARD personnel (storing equipment in inconspicuous places, minimize dust problems, etc.). 26. It is hereby understood that access to the subject property is through property owned and controlled by the United States Department of Agriculture, U.S. Forest Service, and LESSEE hereby agrees to comply with any and all rules and regulations as required by this agency. (SPECIAL) .3. 5173/7/90 27. In addition to the horses and mules which are required for LESSEE's operation, LESSEE may keep additional animals on the premises with the written permission of the BOARD. 28. If, at some point, during the terms of this Lease, the LESSEE wishes to enter into a longer Lease based on the need to amortize improvements, the BOARD shall consider any such request, it being specifically understood that the approval of any such new Lease would lie within the BOARD's sole discretion. 29. For the purpose of administering this Lease, the LESSEE agrees to make all of the accounting books and supporting records to the business activities, as well as those of sublessees operating within the authority of this Lease, available for analysis by qualified representatives of the BOARD or those responsible for review of the BOARD's activities. Review of accounting books and supporting records will be made at dates convenient to the LESSEE and the reviewers. Financial information so obtained will be treated as confidential. The LESSEE will retain the above records and keep them available for review for two (2) years after the year involved, unless disposition is otherwise authorized in writing by the BOARD. 30. The BOARD agrees to cooperate with the LESSEE in the development of water and/or water rights required for the development of the leased premises but does not guarantee such water and/or water rights or the availability or quality of any such water. Any such water or water rights developed by the Lf 33SEE shall become the property of the BOARD upon termination of the Lease. 31. LESSEE agrees to keep the existing trail on the north side of Piney Lake accessible to the public for access into the Eaglesnest Wilderness area for all purposes permitted by the U.S. Forest Service and any relocation of the trail must be approved in advance, in writing by the BOARD and U.S. Forest Service. 32. The BOARD agrees to cooperate with LESSEE in obtaining permits, licenses and all other things (other than rezoning and platting matters which shall be decided if and when the need arises) required by LESSEE in the operation of its business. The parties hereto mutually agree to all the terms and provisions herein contained. Executed on the day and year above written. TOMAI CITY AND COUNTY OF DENS ER, acting by and through its BOARD OF WATER COMMISSIONERS By: Xanager APPROVED AS TO FORM: L gal Division LESSEE: VAIL ASSOCIATES, INC. r 1, ATTEST: By: ! �• Telephone: A-4 - 3a3-y�G —SGo r ri (SPECIAL) A. 5173/7190 EXHIBIT "A" A parcel of land situated in the south half of the southeast quarter (S1/2 SE1/4) of Section 12, Township 4 South, Range 81 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian, County of Eagle, State of Colorado, being more particularly described and bounded as follows: Beginning at the southeast corner of said Section 12; thence North 83055'47" West along the south line of the southeast quarter of said Section 12, a distance of 2758.48 feet to the south quarter corner of said Section 12; thence North 0°36'57" East along the west line of the southeast quarter of said Section 12, a distance of 691.67 feet to a point; thence North 86°00'30" East, a distance of 631.24 feet to a point; thence North 76014130" East, a distance of 504.50 feet to a point; thence North 65013130" East, a distance of 730.44 feet to a point on the north line of the south half of the southeast quarter (S1/2 SE1/4) of said Section 12; thence South 84°27'34" East along said north line, a distance of 956.70 feet to a point on the east line of the southeast quarter of said Section 12; thence South 0°01'00" East along said east line, a distance of 1360.98 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning, as shown on D.W.D. drawing Dr. 67 No. 1938, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. The above described parcel contains 68.3 acres, more or less. 16160/(47) SE 1/4 SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH, RANGE 81 WEST 6th P.M EAGLE COUNTY - Center Sec. 12 W W N v, r I� I T 2 > J j v M�%!TN L/NE SE 14- SEC. /? N 1/2 SE 1/4 SEC. 12 E tea car Sec 12 33 Ivor E C�cr This dro•v n dep�"IS the portel of Iondd ocqurred by warronty Oeed doted September 28 1970, recorded In the records of the Clerk 9 recorder I cr Eagle County in Book 218 of Page 860 on October 9, 1970 . It is based on the Bureau of I.c-id Management Dependent Resurvey of T� vnship 4 South Range 81 West dated A,gjst 15, 683 and supersedes Lind rep aces Ornver Water Orrpartment droN:r.o r No 1938 , doted September 23 , 1:-: 0 / Bearings are based on the east ime ;t the, s,-,theost Quorter of Section 12 heano S'U"01 Uu'E For c:eld Notes ;:.. Feld Books 2342 Pages 54-77 HIGH WATER ,LINE i �- 2537 Pn;Ies I - 19 ELEV. 9442.0 / witness h 6ltness Comer A L/NE v S�� �� 0 62' from J 198 fror Er/4 SEC. /? y/ � 9 (17 8 L. M loe - — — Corse► (S84°29E f784-38 Survey S N N S 1/2 SE 1/4 SEC. 12 lav �o so 1 N76o 143d Eedl N86°0030' E \ �g0A.5 Survey SG E \\ \ \\\\\ 956. TO M N65a�3gpe0 Jgy \\• \�\,,.\\. 631 24' Survey 504.50 \ N \\ mw \ m \\\\ (N 56 o 83 `yy \ N83'4 Byy N S) e (2 758 6 2 758.48 1/4 C !c. 12 70 W \ `\ 0 �\ \ SOUTH �\ '\ \N SEC PINEY 7 LAKE R `mil Beginrnnq I SE Car HIGH WATER LINE I Sec. 12 ( \ ELEV.9442.0' I 400 200 0 400 eW SCALE IN FEET LEGEND REAL ESTATE ACQUIRED d BLM BRASS CAP ESTABLISHED BY1963 DEPENDENT RESURVEY BLM BRASS C-P 19GI REMONUMENTED v 0. W 0 BRASS CAP DOCUMENT DATED -7PTFMBER 28,1970 SEC`Y FILE 322 DOC. 58 DENVER WATER DEPARTMENT ROBERTS TUNNEL COLL. SYSTEM REAL ESTATE ACQUIRED FROM THE ESTATE OF FRANK P. 81 GRACE E. MARUGG SCALE: I"= 400' DATE:SEPTEMBER23,198 DRN. BKH TR.- ICK. APP. -+ � � _.tea DR. 67 NO.19 MEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commissioners/Board of Health FROM: Raymond P. Merry, R.E.H.S. Environmental Health Office DATE: May 28, 1991 RE: Piney Lake Septic System Included in your packet is a Colorado Department of Health application for site approval for construction of a wastewater treatment system at Piney Lake. Vail Associates is doing this in order to facilitate the proper disposal of wastewaters generated from their food service facility already on site. Vail Associates is asking the State to approve of the engineered design submitted. As part of the process, the State requires several signatures to accompany the site application before their review can begin. Also, our regulations require the Board of Health to review such designs. Therefore, I am asking that you consider signing the site application and mark the "No Comment" blank on the form enclosed as to not imply approval of other planning issues.which..will be before you within the next couple months. I have reviewed the design, on behalf of the Board of Health, and will likely recommend approval of the system to the State. Please call with any questions at extension 730. RM/mk COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Water Quality Control Division 4210 East llth Avenue " Denver, Colorado 80220 APPLICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL FOR CONSTRUCTION OR EXPANSION OF: A) DOMESTIC WASTEWATER TREATMENT WORKS (INCLUDING TREATMENT PLANTS, OUTFALL SEWERS, AND LIFT STATIONS) OVER 2.,A00 GPD CAPACITY. B) INTERCEPTORS (IF REQUIRED BY C.R.S. 25-8-702 (3)) APPLICANT: VAIL ASSOCIATES. INC. c/o Brad Foster ADDRESS: P.O. Box 7_ Vail_, rQ R1658 PHONE: '1()'1_47Fi_96n1 Consulting Engineer's Name and Address: ALPINE ENGINEERING, INC. c/o Glenn Palmer P.O. Box 97, Edwards, CO 81632 PHONE: I03_926-3373 A. Summary of information regarding new sewage treatment plant: mrrIC SYSTEM) 1. Proposed Location: (Legal Description) SOUTH 1/2, SSE 1A, Section 12 Township 4 SOUTH, Range 81 WEST, EAGLE County. 2. Type and capacity of treatment facility proposed: Processes Used SEPTIC SYSTEM; SEPTIC TANKS AND BURIED_ LINED_ SAND_ FILTER Hydraulic 6670 Organic ga ay IbS. BOD 5 ay Present PE N/A Design PE N/A % Domestic 1fl(I % Industrial 3. Location of facility: Attach a map of the area which includes the following: (a). 5-mile radius: all sewage treatment plants, lift stations, and.domestic water supply intakes. NONE NONE (b) 1-mile radius: (habitable buildings, location of potable water wells,)and an approximate indication of -the topography. 4. Effluent disposal: Surface discharge to watercourse NONE Subsurface disposal_ see vlans Land Evaporation Other State water quality classification of receiving watercourse(s) NOT APPT.'irARI.R Proposed Effluent Limitations developed in conjunction with Planning and Standards Section, WQCD: BODS mg/1 SS mg/l Fecal Coliform /100 ml Total Residual Chlorine mg/1 Ammonia mg/1 Other 5. Will a State or Federal grant be sought to finance any portion -of this project? NO 6. Present zoning of site area? NOT ZONED - Zoning with a 1-mile radius of site? U.S. FOREST SERVICE 7. What is the distance downstream from the discharge to the nearest domestic water supply intake? Subsurface discharge, nearest downstream (Name of supply) approximately 11 miles downstream (Address of Supply) What is the distance downstream from the discharge to the nearest other point of diversion? Subsurface discharge, nearest downstream occupied ranch is (Name of User) approximately 11 miles downstream —(Address •o User -1- WQCD-3 (Revised 8-83) t C. If the facility will be located on or adjacent to a site that is. owned or managed by a Federal or State agency, send the agency a copy of this application. D. Recommendation of governmental authorities: Please address the following issues in your recommendation decision. Are the proposed facilities consistent with the comprehensive plan and any other plans for the area, including -the 201 Facility Plan or 208 Water Quality Management Plan, as they affect water quality? If you have any further comments or questions, please call 320-8333, Extension 5272. 2. Recommend Recommend No Date Aggr�� Disapproval Comment = Signature of Representative Mr. Frank Marugg (adjacent owner) U.S.F.S (adjacent owner) 3 s Z�-q ._. Boar o unty mm s 4. -S'� q V �E Loca�;�Hdalthut or ty 5. /Uity-/County-Planning Authority 6. Counc of Governments/Regionalann ng 7. State Geologist 8. s a owe re B� e& (Ikpnp8wc1Ar1)ons f or (For lift stations, the signature of the State Geologic s no requ re pp treatment plants require all signatures.) I certify that I am familiar with the requirements of the "Regulations for Site Applications For Domestic Wastewater Treatment Works," and have posted the site in accordance with the regulations. An engineering report, as described by the regulations, has been prepared and is enclosed. /(�b ��/� 1Brad W. Foster DATE ��D%I ����� �LC�t�tc�r/ Glenn Palmer Signature of Applicant TYPED NAME -3- WQCD-3 (Revised 8-83) ALPINE ENGINEERING INC May 30, 1991 Mr. Ray Merry Eagle County Health Department P.O. Box 179 Eagle, CO 81631 Dear Mr. Merry, DECEIVED MAY 3 1 1991 cA LE, �04U v ��r:�° 1- ti.v.�,/. _O rod N This letter serves as a follow up to the cover letter submitted to you (or Rojer Hosea) on May 21, 1991, (also dated May 21, 1991). 1. Dosing The average flow to the septic tanks is,4446 gallons per day. The system will be designed to provide dosing 4 times per day, at 1100 gallons per dose. 2. As discussed with Mr. Ed Church of Church Engineering, the distribution pipes can be spaced at 6' maximum on center. The plans have been changed per his comments, and are attached. 3. Copies of the plans and applications have been sent to: Mr. Rich Phelps, U.S.F.S., adjacent property owner Mr. Frank M arugg, adjacent property owner Mr. Lane Wyatt, Northwest Council of Governments Mr. Jim Soule, Colorado Geological Survey Mr. Forrest Christie, Denver Water Board Mr. Keith Montag, Eagle County Planning Commission The Eagle County Commissioners (sent to you) Copies of these letters were also sent to your for your records. We would like to be on the June 5, 1991 Planning Commission meeting. We plan to meet with the Board of Health and County Commissioners on Wednesday, May 29, 1991. If you need more copies for the Commissioners please call. Seeding We recommend that the disposal field be seeded after installation of the subsurface disposal system. A good native grass cover will promote evapotranspiration from the field. We recommend using a seed mix such as a "Foothills, Pasture, or Prairie" mixes available at local feed and seed stores. These mixes do not require irrigation and develop a growth 10 to 15 inches high. No automatic sprinkler system should be installed above the disposal field. Operation and maintenance plan The owner must realize an onsite sewage disposal system is considerably different from public sewer services. The owner must be aware of and assume the Edwards Business Center • P. O. Box 97 . Edwards, Colorado 81632 9303/949-4640 •303/926-3373 responsibility for continued maintenance of the system. We recommend the pumping of the septic tanks at the end of the first year of use to monitor sludge accumulation and at a minimum of every 2 years afterward. There are also daily considerations, such as not putting plastic or other nonbiodegradable material down the sewage disposal system. Also, water use must be carefully monitored so toilets are not allowed to run when seals malfunction. To illustrate the point, it should be noted a running toilet will consume in excess of 1000 gallons per day if allowed to run. As the system is designed for only 6670 GPD. Excessive loading (such as from running toilets) will flood and irrevocably harm the system, and stress the onsite well. We also caution you against installation of a water softener. The high levels of salt from the backwash of a water softener is detrimental to all onsite sewage disposal systems and a separate drywell should be constructed for the backwash waste if a water softener is installed. No landscaping or plastic can be installed over the disposal field which will reduce evapotranspiration from the field. The use of the sections of the disposal fields should be rotated at 6 month intervals. One section should be drying at all times. If an individual section becomes saturated it can be closed and allowed to dry while the "dry" section is opened. The only mechanical component is the pump. The pump should be a locally available heavy duty pump which will provide long service life. A service label for the system should be attached to the alarm which incudes the pump size and model number and emergency phone numbers to call for service. Treatment alternatives In addition to the considerations noted in the May 21, 1991 letter, we have estimated the cost of the evapotranspiration system to be approximately $5 per sf(39,000 sf) _ $195,000. The evapotranspiration system is not economically feasible. GrmindwatPr A monitoring hole will be drilled near the proposed system, to establish the high ground water level. The bottom of the fields will be located a minimum 4' above the high seasonal groundwater table. Lease Agreement A copy of Vail Associates' lease with the Denver Water Board is attached. If you have any questions please call. Sincerely, 6. i a&10� Glenn Palmer, PE GP/lm Enclosure 1-ecLse� rre�viovst� C- I312Aa FOSiE?- ALPINE ENGINEERING INCY M e�ey June 10, 1991 Mr. Jim Chubrilo Colorado Department of Health 410 South Lincoln Steamboat Springs, CO 80437 RE: Piney Lake Septic System Dear Mr. Chubrilo: rlvv� j, EAGLE COUNTY UEVEL&MENT Please find attached, the Eagle County, and State application for site approval of a septic system, and plans for the proposed Piney Lake septic system. INTRODUCTION Vail As has recently leased the Piney Lake property from the Denver Water Board, and desires to improve the existing facilities at the site, for use as a summer recreational guest ranch. Activities would include boating, fishing, horseback riding, picnicking, hiking, etc. Vail Associates also intends to maintain the winter snowmobiling activities at the site. The use of the restrooms would be limited during the winter. Vail Associates would like to have the Ranch upgraded and operational by June 20, 1991, and will begin construction as soon as the permits are obtained. Existing facilities .by the previous operators of the site include a kitchen and dining facility, stables, corrals, various sheds and storage buildings. Two outhouses or pit privies previously provided for the disposal of sanitary wastes for the area. It is my understanding that a holding tank was located outside the kitchen, which was pumped to a truck and removed from the site on a regular basis. Vail Associates proposes to provide a restroom facility, improve the existing kitchen, provide a grease trap, and discharge the kitchen and restroom wastes to the proposed septic system. The existing pit outhouses are to be removed per Eagle County Regulations. PROPOSED USE Vail Associates plans on up to a maximum of 300 group guests using the Ranch on a daily basis (arrive about 10:00 A.M. by bus from Vail, and 90% of the guests are expected to leave by 3:00 P.M.). In addition, it is expected that about 150 people will visit Piney Lake, not part of the organized guests mentioned above. It is expected that these Edwards Business Center • P.O. Box 97 • Edwards, Colorado 81632.303/926-3373 • FAX 303/926-3390 2 visitors will stay for a period for 2 to 4 hours. A maximum of 1 meal per day will be served to the 300 group guests, and it is expected that up to 50% of the 150 daily visitors will eat a meal. Approximately 20 employees will be needed to operate the Ranch. A maximum of twelve (12) employees will live at the Ranch, and 6 to 8 employees will drive up from Vail every day. A private restroom is proposed for the 12 full time employees, where 4 showers, 2 water closets, 4 sinks, and 1 clothes washer is proposed. The public restroom is to provide 6 water closets, 3 urinals, and 6 sinks, total. SEPTIC SYSTEM OPERATION The septic system, restrooms, and water system is to be operated and maintained by Vail Associates, who, as the owners and operators of the Vail and Beaver Creek ski areas, has competently operated facilities of similar nature. PERCOLATION TEST/SOIL PROFILES On Monday, May 6, 1991 Brad Foster of Vail Associates and I went to the Piney Lake site to dig percolation test holes and (2) two soil profile holes. The site was covered with 2 to 4.5' of snow, except where snowcats had removed snow. The ground was not frozen, probably as a result of snow cover. The percolation test holes were pre -wetted and covered with insulation to keep from freezing. The soil profile holes were dug at the low points of the proposed leach field area, to a depth of 8 feet. The soil appeared to be a well graded, uniform consistency, sandy loam. No groundwater was observed in the pits when they were dug, or when we left the site, or when the pits were observed the next day. On Tuesday, May 7, 1991, percolation tests were performed on 7 percolation holes. Results are as follows: PERCOLATION,RATE, HOLE MINUTES/INCH 1 1 2 6.7 3 3 4 5 5 5.5 6 6.9 7 14.7 Avg = 6.11 min/in TREATMENT ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED A subsurface, lined sand filter, and septic tanks, are proposed to treat the sewage generated from the proposed restrooms and kitchen. Absorption trenches were considered, but require too large of minimum horizontal distances J M 3 to locate the leach fields on the site. An evapotranspiration field was considered, however, adequate area is not available on the site. In addition to the considerations noted above we have estimated the cost of the evapotranspiration system to be approximately $5 per sf (39,000 sf) _ $195,000. The evapotranspiration system is not economically feasible. BURIED, SAND FILTER DESIGN The purpose of the sand filter is to treat the effluent, before discharging the effluent into the ground. As discussed with Duane Watson of the Colorado Department of Health, if the sides of the sand filter are lined with a waterproof membrane, all of the effluent discharged to the field must go through the sand filter, and is not allowed to percolate through the sidewalls.of the field. Once the effluent passes through the sand filter and is treated, it is acceptable to discharge into the ground. The proposed treatment allows the system to be classified as a "Lined Sand Filter". As discussed with Mr. Ed Church of Church Engineering, the distribution pipes can be spaced 6' maximum on center. The plans have been changed per his comments, and are attached. FILTER MEDIA A sieve analysis has been taken on two samples of the sand from test pits #1 and #2. Preliminary results indicate the sand has a uniformity coefficient of less than 4, and an effective grain size near .25 mm. Additional tests are to be run, to determine the availability of on site filter media. If needed, sand will be hauled in for the top foot of the sand filter, to insure a uniform filter media. DOSING AND FILTER BED RECOVERY The sand filter is to be divided into 3 equal beds, to alternate effluent to each of the f ields and allow one of the f ields to recover, if need be. A dosing tank is proposed to flush the system 3 to 4 times per day. The dosing tank is proposed to discharge into.a surge tank, which will direct the effluent to the desired filter bed. Should one field become clogged, the surge tank will allow effluent to overflow to a separate field. The average flow to the septic tanks is 4446 gallons per day. The system will be designed to provide dosing 4 times per day, at 1100 gallons per dose. HORIZONTAL DISTANCES The lined sand filter allows minimum horizontal distance from the proposed well, Piney Lake, and the Piney River to be achieved. GROUNDWATER No groundwater was evident in either soil profile hole on May 6 or 7, 1991. The holes were dug to a depth of 8' to an approximate elevation of 86.5 (#1), and m 4 85.6 (#2). On May 29, 1991, a field survey was completed on the site. A majority of the snow in the area had melted, however small patches of snow remained. It appeared to be the time near peak runoff, and when the highest groundwater elevation would occur. Water was ponding in test pit #1 to an elevation of 92.09 and 90.62.in test pit #2. Assuming, that 92.09 is the annual high groundwater elevation, and the 4' depth sand filter needs to be located above this, the invert of the sand filter distributioon lines should be at elevation 96.09. Topographic information indicate that the existing ground to the north and west of the proposed septic system is very flat, which appears allow more surface water to percolate into the ground than drain off the surface. A system of surface inlets, and subsurface drains has been proposed to improve surface drainage conditions, and provided a subsurface drainage system, to keep the groundwater surface elevation below 92.06. A monitoring hole will be drilled near the proposed system, to establish the high ground water level. The bottom of the fields will be located a minimum 4' above the high seasonal groundwater table. ABSORPTION RATE OF GROUND BELOW SAND FILTER The percolation rate of the existing sand averaged 6 minutes per inch.. Using Eagle County design standards for an absorption field, the size of the field is A = (Q/5)(T**0.5) A = (6670/5)(6**0.5) = 3268 SF Since the sand filter area is 6670 SF, the existing sandy material has adequate capacity to absorb the sand filter discharge. SEPTIC TANK Low flush toilets are to be used in the restrooms, which will decrease the volume of effluent discharged to the sand filter. A reduction in the design flow has been proposed, (and noted in the sewage flow calculations) which will be used for sizing the lined sand filter area. The septic tank volume is to be sized without applying the reduction for low flush toilets. SEEDING We recommend that the disposal field be seeded after installation of the subsurface disposal system. A good native grass cover will promote evapotranspiration from the field. We recommend using a seed mix such as a "Foothills, Pasture, or Prairie" mixes available at local feed and seed stores. These mixes do not require irrigation and develop a growth 10 to 15 inches high. No automatic sprinkler system should be installed above the disposal field. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN The owner must realize an onsite sewage disposal system is considerably different from public sewer services. The owner must be aware of and assume the m 5 responsibility for continued maintenance of the system. We recommend the pumping of the septic tanks at the end of the first year of use to monitor sludge accumulation and at a minimum of every 2 years afterward. There are also daily considerations, such as not putting plastic or other nonbiodegradable material down the sewage disposal system. Also, water use must be carefully monitored so toilets are not allowed to run when seals malfunction. To illustrate the point, it should be noted a running toilet will consume in excess of 100 gallons per day if allowed to run. The system is designed for only 6670 GPD. Excessive loading (such as from running toilets) will flood and irrevocably harm the system, and stress the onsite well. We also caution you against installation of a water softener. The high levels of salt from the backwash of a water softener is detrimental to all onsite sewage disposal systems and a separate drywell should be constructed for the backwash waste if a water softener is .installed. No landscaping or plastic can be installed over the disposal field which will reduce evapotranspiration from the field. The use of the sections of the disposal fields should be rotated at 6 month intervals. One section should be drying at all times. If an individual section becomes saturated it can be closed and allowed to dry while the "dry" section is opened. The only mechanical component is the pump. The pump should be a locally available heavy duty pump which will provide long service life. A service label for the system should be attached to the alarm which includes the pump size and model number and emergency phone numbers to call for service. LEASE AGREEMENT A copy of Vail Associates' lease with the Denver Water Board is attached. If you have any questions please call. Sincerely, Glenn Palmer, PE GP/lm Enclosure cc: Brad Foster Ray Merry Ed Church n I 1 PINEY LAKE SEPTIC SYSTEM SEWAGE FLOW CALCULATIONS 1. 12 full time employees (overnight) @ 50 GPD 600 GPD 2. Laundry, for 12 employees only, 19.5 gal washing machine 117 GPD *6 (19.5 gal)(12 people)(3 loads/person/week)/(6 day/week) 3. Kitchen, wash silverware, plates A. 300 group visitors, 6 to 10 hour visit, 1 meal served. (300 people)(3 gallon/meal)(1 meal/person) 900 GPD B. 150 day visitors, 2 to 4 hour expected visit, 50% eat a meal (150 people)(3 gallon/meal)(0.5 meal/person) 225 GPD 4. Public restroom *1 Al. Use public park criteria *2 o W.C. = (36 gallon/fixture/hr)(657.-) (6 fixtures)(10 hrs) 1404 GPD o Urinal = (10 gallon/fixture/hr)(3 fixtures)(10 hrs) 300 GPD subtotal 1704 GPD F-- use A2. W.C. _ (3 flushes/person/day)(300 people)(1.6 gallon/flush)*3 1440 GPD W.C. _ (1 flushes/person/day)(150 people)(1.6 gallon/flush) 240 GPD subtotal 1680 GPD A3. W.C. = (flush/5 minutes)(9 fixtures)(10 hrs)(60 min/hr)(1.6 gallon)*4 1704 GPD B. Sink = (6 sinks)(15 gallon/hr/sink)(10 hrs) 900 GPD Total 4446 GPD Peak flow (sand filter)*7 = 4446(1.50 peak factor) 6670 GPD Peak flow (septic tank) = 5202(1.50 peak factor) = 7803 GPD *1 Group arrives at 10:00 A.M. and 90% are expected to leave by 8:00 P.M. = 10 hours of use. *2 Reduction for low flush toilet. (1.6 gallons per flush actual)/(3.5 gallon/flush standard) = 46% reduction factor. Use 65% reduction factor (which is less of a reduction than 46%). *3 Water use is based upon the number of flushes per visitor, independent of whether the toilet or urinal is used. Day users are expected to visit for a 2 to 4 hour period, and flush less than group visitors, on a 6 to 10 hour visit. *4 Based upon each toilet and urinal being flushed every 5 minutes, continuously for 10 hours. *5 The highest average peak use is expected to be 4446 GPD. The average use is not expected to be this high. If a peak factor of 150% is used, and a peak flow of 6670 GPD is obtained, 2556 GPD is generated from the public toilets. (150%)1704 = 2556. If 2556 is generated from the toilets, this means that each toilet and urinal must be 2 flushed once every 3.4 minutes, for 10 continuous hours, or each of 450 patrons uses the restroom 3.6 times per day, which appears to be very conservative. A water meter is proposed to be installed on the water system to verify predicted demands. *6 The washing machine represents (117/4446) = 2.6 of the total daily discharge. o Septic tanks Provide detention for 30 hours Volume = (30/24)(7803) = 9754 gallons Provide (4) 2500 gallon tanks *7 The peak or design flow was reduced for the sand filter, for low flush toilets, but not reduced for the septic tanks. Sand Filter Area Q = 6670 GPD Application rate = 1 GPD/SF = Area = 6670 SF Provide three filter areas of equal size to alternate use. A surge tank is proposed to allow effluent to be directed to alternating filter beds, and if one bed becomes clogged, allow discharge to the other filter beds. Minimum Horizontal Distances, From Buried Lined Sand Filter Spring, wells D = 60' Lake, water course or stream = 25' Dry gulch D = 10' Grease. Trap Kitchen 900 GPD, possibly over I to 3 hour period when washing dishes, = flow = 7 1/2 to 15 GPM Provide minimum 700 gallon storage ':IC 1. 12 full-time employees .17 lbs/pers/day = 2.04 lbs/day 2. Laundry 2 lbs/washer/day = 2.00 lbs/day 3. Kitchen (.03 lbs/meal)375 = 11.25 lbs/day 4. Public restroom Toilet (.04 lbs/fixture/hr)(6 fixtures)(10 hrs) = 2.40 lbs/day Urinal (.01 lbs/fixture/hr)(3 fixtures)(10 hrs) = .30 lbs/day Sink (.04 lbs/fixture/hr)(6 sinks)(10 hrs) = 2.40 lbs/day Total = 20.39 lbs/day FORCE MAIN MANHOLE DOSING TANK BURIED LINED SAND FILTERS 0= 6G70 6PD PINEY LAKE SEWER SYSTEM SCHEMATIC TC 3 G UP VISITORS ! I MEALIDAY 150 DAY VISITORS ! 112 MEALIDAY (I) 3 COMPARTMENT SINK (1) HAND SINK FROM KITCHEN (I) Wc. .-TANK AND PUMP TO SEPTIC IPLILIC AES ROOM PRIG°� II 1 TROOM I�J SEPTIC TANKS 0 -7805 GPD SURGE 8 DISTRIBUTION TANK (TO ALTERNATE FLOW TO FILTER BEDS) DISTRIBUTION BOX (TYP.) (6) W.C. (3) URINALS (6) SMCS )LAVATORIES (4) SILKS IL'AVATORIES (4) 3HOIA1ER4 w WASIIER COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Water Quality Control Division 4210 East llth Avenue Denver, Colorado 80220 APPLICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL FOR CONSTRUCTION OR EXPANSION OF: A) DOMESTIC WASTEWATER TREATMENT WORKS (INCLUDING TREATMENT PLANTS, OUTFALL SEWERS, AND LIFT STATIONS) OVER 2.,000 GPD CAPACITY. B) INTERCEPTORS (IF REQUIRED BY C.R.S. 25-8-702 (3)) APPLICANT: VAIL ASSOCIATES. INC. c/o Brad Foster ADDRESS: P.O. Box 7, Vail ♦ en 9169A PHONE: %)3_476_9601 Consulting Engineer's Name and Address: ALPINE ENGINEERING, INC. c/o Glenn Palmer P.O. Box 97, Edwards, CO 81632 PHONE: 303-926-3373 A. Summary of information regarding new sewage treatment plant: (SEPTIC SYSTEM) 1. Proposed Location: (Legal Description) SOUTH 1/2, SE 1/4, Section 12 Township 4 SOUTH, Range 81 WEST, EAGLE County. 2. Type and capacity of treatment -facility proposed: Processes Used SEPTIC SYSTEM: SEPTIC TANKS AND BURIED LINED SAND FILTER Hydraulic 6670 Organic 20.4 _ gal/day�BOD57day Present PE N/A Design PE N/A % Domestic tsL— % Industrial 3. Location of facility: Attach a map of the area which includes the following: (a) 5-mile radius: all sewage treatment plants, lift stations, and domestic water supply intakes. NONE ,-NONE (b) 1-mile radius: (habitable buildings, location of potable water wells,).and an approximate indication of the topography. 4. Effluent disposal: Surface discharge to watercourse NONE Subsurface disposal _see plans - Land Evaporation ether State water quality classification of receiving watercourses) NOT AppT.TpART.F Proposed Effluent Limitations developed in conjunction with Planning and Standards Section, WQCD: BODS mg/1 SS mg/l Fecal Coliform /100 ml Total Residual Chlorine mg/l Ammonia mg/l Other 5. Will a State or Federal grant be sought to finance any portion of this project? NO 6. Present zoning of site area?_ NOT ZONED Zoning with a 1-mile radius of site? U.S. FOREST SERVICE . 7. What is the distance downstream from the discharge to the nearest domestic water supply intake? $ub5urface discharge, neares lName or suppiy) approximately.11 miles downstream (Address of Supply) What is the distance downstream from the discharge to the nearest other point of diversion? Subsurface discharge, nearest downstream occupied ranch i (Name or user) approximately 11 miles downstream (Address -of User -1- WQCD-3 (Revised 8-83) G ) t, C. If the facility will. be located on or adjacent to a site that is owned or managed by a Federal or State agency, send the agency a copy of this application. D. Recommendation of governmental authorities: Please address the following issues in your recommendation decision. Are the proposed facilities consistent with the comprehensive plan and any other plans for the area, including the 201 Facility Plan or 208 Water Quality Management Plan, as they affect water quality? If you have any further comments or questions, please call 320-8333, Extension 5272. r Recommend Recommend No Date Aggroval Disaggroval gomme� Signature 2f Representative Mr. Frank Marugg (adjacent owner) 2. 'U.S.F.S (adjacent owner) 3. x, Board of County Commissioners 4. Local Health ut or ty My/ ounty Planning Authority 6. Counc of Governments/Regionalann ng 7. State Geologist 8 • ��tt. (For lift stations, the signature of the State Geologis n�'s nortrequ�red. ( p c �tri)ons for treatment plants require all signatures.) I certify that I am familiar with the requirements of the "Regulations for Site Applications For Domestic Wastewater Treatment Works," and have posted the site in accordance with the regulations. An engineering report, as described by the regulations, has been prepared and is enclosed . .MJ Brad W. Foster DATE 5 ��DlG%� / ��� Glenn Palmer Signature of App scant TYPED NAME -3- ;WQCD-3 (Revised 8-83) v.. MAY 03 '91 15:06 BEAVER CREEK 303 949-5750 EX3012 P.2/2 , SE 1/4 SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH, RANGE 81 WEST Oath P.M. --- EAGLE COUNTY -- I ec.e 12 N I/.2 SE 1/4 SEC.12 jEI Cor NOTE c3 Thi drawin depi 1 the parcel of lang ac +red b �Narront� Dso �oted 5e ember 8 ��70 I r c rded in the records of the Clerk & iRe4oreer w �ogle C unty In Book 218 at Page 860 06 ctober S �9?0 . It is ba ed on the Bureau of Land Mon6gement De )Naon ent Resury yy of Township ggouth Range 81 st fated i Auguel 1511`�83 ana supers des, and reslaces �,.. I panus► datedr 5epveribarn23 f 197c� r 7 No i938 , Bearings are based on. the east vne Gt 'he, southeast quarter of Sect IPA 12 being S 00 01 00 E /•` For Field Notes O .n Feld 8001h6 2342 Pages 54-77 HIGH WATER ,LINE and 2537 Pages I - i9 ELEV. 9442.0 I Witness N Witness Corner w Corner ,^.. 10.62' from 7e 19.8 from H �!N" Corner corner !/r asvf sEc. ,e t! 7 —�� /� (S 84a29' w � B.L.M.) E 6L.M.r W N 1764. 3g Survey 8 02 E Surve ." S 1/2 SE 1/4 SEC. 12 p\ ,y, joe.e6 14'Z fi39.24' Survay (535, 6' 096d) \ v, IN N 83 56 W \ Surve (2758,80 sovrH �•'"� PlLAKE T Sec. 12 HIGH WATER �INE ELEV.. 9442.0 aoo too 0 Soo $GALE IN FEET LEGEND REAL ESTATE ACOUIRED d BLM BRASS CAP ESTABLISHED BY1983 DEPENDENT RESURVEY SLM BRASS CAP 1961 REMONUMENTED is D.W.D. BRASS CAP DOCUMENT DATED SEPTEMBER 28,1970 AINS 60.3 ACRES DENVER WATER DEPARTMENT ROBERTS FUNNEL COLL. SYSTEM REAL ESTATE ACQUIRED FROM THE ESTATE OF FRANK P. & GRA&E E. bdARU SCALE: 1++s 400' OATE:SEPTEMBER 2 198 DRN. EIKH I TR. I ICK. N_._w—, COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Water Quality Control Division 4210 East llth Avenue Denver, Colorado 80220 APPLICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL FOR CONSTRUCTION OR EXPANSION OF: A) DOMESTIC WASTEWATER TREATMENT WORKS (INCLUDING TREATMENT PLANTS, OUTFALL SEWERS, AND LIFT STATIONS) OVER 2.,000 GPD CAPACITY. B) INTERCEPTORS (IF REQUIRED BY C.R.S. 25-8-702 (3)) APPLICANT: VAIL ASSOCIATES. INC. c/o Brad Foster ADDRESS: P.O. Box 7. Vail- Co 8:69R PHONE: -j0-1_47fi-56n: Consulting Engineer's Name and Address: ALPINE ENGINEERING, INC. c/o Glenn Palmer P.O. Box 97, Edwards, CO 81632 PHONE: 303_926-3373 A. Summary of information regarding new sewage treatment plant: (SEPTIC SYSTEM) 1. Proposed Location: (Legal Description) SOUTH 1/2, SE 1/4, Section 12 Township 4 SOUTH, Range 81 WEST, EAGLE County. 2. Type and capacity of treatment facility proposed: Processes Used SEPTIC SYSTEM; SEPTIC TANKS AND BURIED _LINED SAND FILTER Hydraulic 6670 Organic ;P-4 gal/day sue. BUD S% Present PE N/A Design PE N/A % Domestic 1O() % Industrial 3. Location of facility: Attach a map of the area which includes the following: (a) 5-mile radius: all sewage treatment plants, lift stations, and domestic water supply intakes. NONE ,-NONE (b) 1-mile radius: (habitable buildings, location of potable water wells,) -and an approximate indication of the topography. 4. Effluent disposal: Surface discharge to watercourse NONE Subsurface disposal see plans _ Land Evaporation ether State water quality classification of receiving watercotirse(s) NOT ANpT.-rr.ART.F Proposed Effluent Limitations developed in conjunction with Planning and Standards Section, WQCD: BODS mg/1 SS mg/1 Fecal Coliform /100 ml Total Residual Chlorine mg/1 Ammonia mg/l Other 5. Will a State or Federal grant be sought to finance any portion of this project? NO 6. Present zoning of site area? NOT z0NED Zoning with a 1-mile radius of site? U.S. FOREST SERVICE . 7. What is the distance downstream from the discharge to the nearest domestic water supply intake? Subsurface discharge, nearest downstream ame or supply) approximately.11 miles downstream (Address of Supply) What is the distance downstream from the discharge to the nearest other point of diversion? Subsurface discharge, nearest downstream occupied ranch i Name of User) approximately 11 rules downstream (Address -of User -1- WQCD-3 (Revised 8-83) r 4 C. If the facility will -be located on or adjacent to a site that is owned or managed by a Federal or State agency, send the agency a copy of this application. D. Recommendation of governmental authorities: Please address the following issues in your recommendation decision. Are the proposed facilities consistent with the comprehensive plan and any other plans for the area, including -the 201 Facility Plan or 208 Water Quality Management Plan, as they affect water quality? If you have any further comments or questions, please call 320-8333, Extension 5272. Recommend Recommend No Date Aggroval Disaggroval Comment Signature of Revresentative Mr. Frank Marug (adjacent owner) 2. W.S.F.S (adjacent owner) 3. >. Board of ounty Commissioners 4. Loca e alth Authority 5. City/County Planning Authority 6. Council of Governments egional Planning 7. (9 ' X'd Sta Irlofist EAq-91- OUTS 8. (For lift stations, the signature of the State Geologis n's nortrequ�re�. (19p$dftc1etri)ons for treatment plants require all signatures.) I certify that I am familiar with the requirements of the "Regulations. for Site Applications For Domestic Wastewater Treatment Works," and have posted the site in accordance with the regulations. An engineering report, as described by the regulations, has been prepared and is enclosed. Brad W. Foster DATEr' �ZD / ��/�� /`��? Glenn Palmer Signature of Applicant TYPED NAME If -3- WQCD-3 (Revised 8-83) PINEY LAKE SEWER SYSTEM SCHEMATIC 300 GRUUP VISITORS ! I MEAL/DAY 150 DAY VISITORS 4 112 MEAL/DAY GREASE TRAP (1) 3 COMPARTMENT SINK (1) HAND SYNC (I) W.C. TANK AND PUMP TO SEPTIC (6) W.C. PUKRE ROM .(6) 3WS /L TS OAVATORE3 FORCE ' MAIN 12 EMPLOYEE (2) W.C. PRIVATE RESTROOM (4) SM /L'AVATORES �- (4) 3HO'1AIERSy MANHOLE WASHER DOSING TANK- n i SEPTIC TANKS 0 s7803 GPD O O SURGE S DISTRIBUTION TANK (TO ALTERNATE FLOW TO FILTER BEDS) DISTRIBUTION BOX (TYP.) 1 15-Ds lOs� ALPINE ENGINEERING INC July 23, 1991 Mr. Jim Chubrillo Colorado Department of Health 410 South Lincoln Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 RE: P.inev River Ranch Septic S stem.ylSubmitted #2 (unlined sand filter above soil with perc rate slower than 60 min/inch.) Dear Mr. Chubrillo, As discussed with you last week, the proposed Piney River Ranch septic system cannot be considered a lined sand filter. Minimum horizontal distances must be considered which are increased by 8 feet for each 100 gpd of design flow over 1000 gpd. However, an unlined sand filter in soil with a percolation rate slower than 60 minutes per inch does not require increasing horizontal distances to pertinent physical features (above the minimum horizontal distances). Tom Bennett, also of the Colorado Department of Health indicated that the soil below the sand filter could be treated to reduce the percolation rate (to slower than 60 min per inch). I have contacted a soils engineer regarding this matter, who has indicated that it is difficult to obtain a pre —determined percolation rate in clay soils where the percolation rate is slower than 30 or 40 minutes per inch. We have therefore considered using an impervious liner with a calculated number of holes, and hole diameter to obtain a percolation rate slower than 60 minutes per inch. Unlined Sand Filter Design (in soil with a perc rate slower than 60 min/in). As discussed with Tom Bennett, it is proposed to install an impervious liner around and below the sand filter and provide orifices in the bottom of the liner that will RESTRICT flow to a rate slower than 60 minutes per inch. This method of restricting flow is regularly used for storm water detention, when discharge flows must not exceed a certain rate. The flow through the orifices would be determined by the equation, Q = CA(2gh)*-"0.5 where C = coefficient of discharge A = area of opening, f t sq g = 32.2 ft/sec sq h = depth of water, ft. Q = discharge, cfs An even distribution of holes in the liner would distribute the effluent Edwards Business Center • P.O. Box 97 • Edwards, Colorado 81632 •303/026-3373 • FAX 303/926-3390 uniformly to the surface below the liner. As can be seen from the above equation, the discharge is proportional to the amount of head, (or depth of effluent in the field). THE HOLES CAN BE SIZED SO THAT A DISCHARGE EQUIVALENT TO 61 min. per inch is discharged when the depth of EFFLUENT IS 2.5' DEEP; 14HEN THE EFFLUENT DEPTH IS LESS THAN 2.5 FEET DEEP, THE DISCHARGE WILL BE SLOWER THAN 61 MIN/INCH. This method of restricting the discharge by means of orifices in the liner is desirable because it provides a relatively easy way to regulate the discharge from the system, (at any desired rate), and discharges to ground below the sand filter in a uniform manner. As discussed with Tom Bennett, Tom thought that the bed size may need to increased so that A = Q/5(T)**0.5, where T = 61 minutes per inch. As discussed with Tom, we feel that the liner is only acting to reduce the percolation rate to 61 mins per inch; the effluent is still discharged into sand below the liner, which has a percolation rate of about 6 minutes per inch. Calculations are attached to show that the sand filter, within the impervious liner has adequate - capacity to handle peak discharges, without increasing the size of the bed area. If the Colorado Department of Health feels that the bed size should be increased to 10,650 SF, a grading and utility plan has been proposed, and attached, for this increased size. If you have any questions, please call. Sincerely, Glenn Palmer, PE GP/lm Attachments cc: Mr. Jack Hunn, Vail Associates, Inc. Mr. Ray Merry, Eagle County Department of Health s Nor #r i...A`r -*Z 17(0 PLAN /7/ FLAN PA6E I Pt 6&7O l067O 6PO Ago = 5wig 51c fl yip = ! GPD lsF APPUcgr1oAv = 6670 Sr {Inch � �h AH = loL Min d}+= (of vein /7(0/7/ eo �' AO ol / inch O/SC�Ae6E OF of c"AW E FED ' /+7- /v/rr„n sop tin 1Fr1/ 1.48rZA tin i FT' ,496 L 7 fZNT = iloD,Sx�"16xG1+n�nf�12"/(. F'ra P�i'E = �Qo ��17i �� 61r��n}� 12" )C FTC } z &AL LONs / t4I N PAI-e (o 9, C-,ALLOW r M I t 5ee Faje 4A GNEC� fY/�SO�PTlQN SATE DF �r�lsITE�PJAL E3EtocrJ Li�vE,� CS�N �} . FeOCOGgT/ON ,e.4 T',f = 6, / MIA111,V4# (off 70 5F Pwv/DED 0 4ee fate 4A SF 5 &540 sF" P,eovIDED 'L/ z4Z cFs . Z4Z cFs PAS ZA A ur #t 2 1)I SCH-Pr2C# i -A M pow L �. tmN l 6t Ik I w .. _... 69 , c _6►PM_.. _ 155 8 CF S IsSg c1=s 2.5'dePtG f C HOLE 40LES . _ .._ GF 5 .. � uo Les 6' :655 1.5� .637 .00Zl3 _ . ;..8q -- _ - 18`T _ _. 58 o IZ4 _2,5,2A-2 5S__._ . 7_4Z CPS 8AOLES • O 0272 cfsOO27z.ck 6le. _ _.../o, (050 s)= lei = jho% peor t /I �840" / sg _" / G00% per //8 SF , rr to CAI 40 11.4 Ph4E 3A PIMA lial.E COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Water Quality Control Division 4210 East llth Avenue Denver, Colorado 80220 APPLICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL FOR CONSTRUCTION OR EXPANSION OF: A) DOMESTIC WASTEWATER TREATMENT WORKS (INCLUDING TREATMENT PLANTS, OUTFALL SEWERS, AND LIFT STATIONS) OVER 29000 GPD CAPACITY. B) INTERCEPTORS (IF REQUIRED BY C.R.S. 25-8-702 (3)) APPLICANT: VAIL ASSOCIATES. INC. c/o Brad Foster ADDRESS: P.O. Box 7. Vail- Co A165A PHONE: 1n1_47fi_Sfin1 Consulting Engineer's Name and Address: ALPINE ENGINEERING, INC. c/o Glenn Palmer P.O. Box 97, Edwards, CO 81632 PHONE: I I-926-1371 A. Summary of information regarding new sewage treatment plant: -(SEPTIC SYSTEM) 1. Proposed Locations (Legal Description)' SOUTH 1/2, SE 1A , Section 12 Township 4 SOUTH, Range 81 WEST, EAGLE County. 2. Type and capacity of treatment facility proposed: Processes Used SEPTIC SYSTEM; SEPTIC TANKS AND BURIED, UNLINED SAND FILTER IN A SOIL WITH PERC RATR Hydraulic 6670 Organic 30-4 SLOWER THAN 60 min/incl ia-17day. s. BOD /day Present PE N/A Design PE N/A X Domestic Inn % Industrial 3. Location of facility: Attach a map of the area which includes the following: (a). 5-mile radluss all sewage treatment plants, lift stations, and.domestic water supply intakes. NONE NONE (b) 1-mile radius: (habitable buildings, location of potable water wells,)and an approximate indication of the topography. 4. Effluent disposal: Surface discharge to watercourse NONE Subsurface disposal_ see mans_ . Land Evaporation Other State water quality classification of receiving watercourse(s) NL)T AppT_TrARt_R Proposed Effluent Limitations developed in conjunction with Planning and Standards Section, WQCD: BODS mg/1 SS mg/l Fecal Coliform /100 ml Total Residual Chlorine mg/1 Ammonia mg/1 Other 5. Will a State or Federal grant be sought to finance any portion of this project? NO 6. Present zoning of site area? NOT ZONED Zoning with a 1-mile radius of site? U.S. FOREST SERVICE 7. What is the distance downstream from the discharge to the nearest domestic water supply intake? Subsurface discbar a nearest do ame o Supply) approximately 11 miles downstream ; (Address of Supply). What is the distance downstream from the discharge to the nearest other point of diversion? Subsurface discharge, nearest downstream occupied ranch is ame ,oUser) , approximately 11 miles downstream ress ,os user -1- WQCI-3 (Revised 8-83) Colorado Department of Health WATER QUALITY CONTROL DIVISION Drinking Water Program 4210 E. llth Avenue Denver, CO 80220 (303)331-4530 / "Date Received" Stamp REQUEST FOR REVIEW OF DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS BY THE COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH PERTAINING TO POTABLE WATER SUPPLY FACILITIES From: Business Address: (Please Type) VAIL ASSOCIATES, INC., dba PINEY RT 31ity, Distiict, Utility or Other Owner P.O. Box 7 Telephone: (303) 476-5601 Vail, CO 81658 Legal Representative Mr. Jack Hunn Dirgctor of Real Estate Name Title County in which facility is located: Eagle PWSID# It is requested that the Colorado Department of Health, Water Quality Control Division review the documents specified.on the information page attached to this form. Documents Submitted: Site Plan Nitrate Analysis Water System Schematic Well Construction Details Analysis of Waterborne Particulates Additional information may be requested by the Water Quality Control Division and local government officials. This may include the relationship of this facility to the area -wide plan, flood plain -data, provision for maintenance and operation of this facility, and legal status of the owner (district, association, municipality). Consulting Engineering Company: Alpine Engineering, Inc. Project Engineer: Glenn Palmer Registered # 22753 Address: P.O. Box 97 Edwards, CO 81632 Telephone: ( 303) 926=3373 Estimated project cost: $ 7300 * * (See item #8 in the instructions for financial information required.) Estimated bid opening date: Estimated completion date: July 21, 1991 *****(See LAST PAGE for instructions)***** 1540m/0103m a Colorado Department of Health WATER QUALITY CONTROL DIVISION Drinking Water Program 4210 E. llth Avenue Denver, CO 80220 (303)331=4530 DATE: July 12, 1991 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN CERTIFICATION, RE: This Statement must accompany all Requests for Review, plans and specifications for water wells and/or water treatment facilities submitted to the Colorado Department of Health. PROJECT TITLE: Piney River Ranch County Eagle CONSULTANT: Alpine Engineering, Inc. P.O. Box 97 Edwards, CO 81632 (303) 926-3373 STATEMENT I hereby certify that a Professional Engineering judgment has been made after evaluating all available flood plain data from the Colorado Water Conservation Board, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Housing and Urban Development, County Government, local flood districts, etc. regarding a potential 100-year flood threat to the Pinev River Ranch well and treatment system '(Well or treatment plant for Vail Associates, Inc. 47 Name of entity or district, etc. In my opinion, these water works as located and designed, are not subject to flood damage by a 100-year event, based on information enclosed from the to the best of my knowledge, the Piney River, at Piney Lake has not been studied by any- of the above noted agencies. 41Cll C4.,1 -b " PIOC� Sign4ture and Title Ppolec* me e_r -7l►&fal Date Community Systems: Professional Engineer's Stamp 1540m/0103m/lc (3) ALPINE ENGINEERING INC July 29, 1991 Colorado Department of Health Water Quality Control Division Drinking Water Program 4210 East llth Avenue Denver, CO 80220 Dear Sir/Madam: Vail Associates desires to improve the existing facilities at the Piney Lake area, for use as a recreation guest ranch. Activities would include boating, fishing, horseback riding, picnicking, hiking, and winter snowmobiling. Existing facilities by the previous operators of the site include a kitchen and dining facility, stables, corrals, and various sheds and storage buildings. Two outhouses or pit privies previously provided for the disposal of sanitary wastes. The pit privies are to be removed, and a new restroom is to be constructed which will provide flush toilets, sinks, and showers. A well has been drilled which will provide water to the restroom and the kitchen, for cooking, dishwashing, and employee restroom, purposes. Vail Associates plans on up to a maximum of 300 group guests using the ranch on a daily basis, and about 150 people who will visit Piney Lake not part of the organized guest group. One meal is to be provided to the visitors. Approximately 20 employees will be needed to operate the ranch. About 12 employees will live at the Ranch, while the remaining 8 employees will drive up from Vail every day. A private restroom is proposed for the 12 full time employees, where 4 showers, 2 water closets, 4 sinks, and 1 clothes washer is proposed. The public restroom is to provide 6 water closets, 3 urinals, and 6 sinks. The water demand is estimated to be about 7000 gallons per day, at peak use. Because of the relatively high demand of 7000 gpd, and the relatively short distance between the well and the mechanical room, it is difficult to achieve a 30 minute contact time for a chlorination disinfection system. A storage tank, additional pump, and additional telemetry and controls would be required to obtain the required contact time for chlorination. The disinfection is therefore proposed to be by ultraviolet light irradiation. As discussed with Greg Akins of the Colorado Department of Health, ultraviolet systems should not have any piping that allows the water in the distribution system to stagnate. Daily use of the kitchen and restrooms as well as the short distance of piping to restooms and the kitchen will mitigate water stagnation in the pipes. A larger distribution line is proposed to provide water Edwards Business Center • P.O. Box 97 • Edwards, Colorado 81632 •303/926-3373 • FAX 303/926-3390 to the horse stables. A check valve can be installed to isolate this system from the kitchen and restroom system. The waterline to the stables will only be used to provide water to horses. A pressure filter, which will filter down to 5 microns is proposed to remove sand, and control turbidity. Water System Operation and Financial Plan The water system is to be operated and maintained by Vail Associates, who, as the owners and operators of the Vail and Beaver Creek ski areas, has competently operated facilities of similar nature. The water system annual costs are expected to be: 1. Replace U.V. lamps once per year, 4 lamps at approximately $50 lamp = $200 2. Replace filters, 8 at $30/filter = $240 3. Diesel/gas to run generator for electricity = $400 Total = $840 per year If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Glenn Palmer, PE GP/lm Upper Eagle Valley Consolidated Water & Sanitation Districts 846 Forest Road Vail, CO 81657-50. System Name: Piney River Ranch System Address: Piney Lake, Vail, CO 8165'7 County: Eagle Phone: (303) 476-5601 Name of Water Source: Piney River Ranch well Raw or Finished: Haw Ground or Surface: Grew.,.-: !late of Sampling: 6/30/91 to 7/1161 Date keceiv-e-d; Quantity S-muled: 1, 0,00 gal. Sample Start Time: 5: 35 PM Sample End Tim3: 4: 00 1'11-1 SAMPLING RATE SHOULD NOT EXCEED ONE GAUON PER MINUTE. Appearance of Filter: Brown color throughout all lavers. Fine Amorphous Debris: moderate (sand) Large Amorphous Debris: 0 Algae: 0 Diatoms: 0 Plant Debris: 0 Giardia: 0 Free -Living Nematodes: 0 Ciliates: 0 Flagellates: 0 Crustaceans /eggs : 0 Other; three particles of pine pollen Largest Observed Particle Size (um): approx. 48 microns Commerit•s : Labor•4tory/Analvst: Carrie Howe 8 191 8: IS FP!,M V P PUPCHAIS I NG PH -GE . 002 Pw 5 e/&; x- Yl-t r9s5 , y he-� �r CHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF WATER COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH DIVISION OF LABORATORIES 0r^y� �- `9 CHEMISTRY SECTION Name: Jena( 5 L ar 1 SDn Lab No. Phone No. 30 Z4J � Q' IV � (o Date Sampled: 4-30 %9 Address Po 6 o k 7 Date Received: City: V c� t Zip: r� Date Resorted: County: a Collected by:. At �ar/Sd� Where Collected: Ph sit, ie T d o k / Mandatory Parameters Arsenic Barium Cadmium Chromium. Fluoride Lead Mercury .Nitrate. -plus Nitrite as -Nitrogen 'Selenium Sodium (recommended) Silver . Radioactivity Gross Alpha Gross Beta Radium 226 Radium 228 + 226 Uranium 0.05 mg/1 I. mg/1 0.010 mg/1 0.05 mg/1 2.4 mg/l 0.05 mg/l 0.002 mg/l 10 mg/1 0.01 mg/l 20 mg/1 0.05 mg/l 15 pCi/1 50 pCi/l 3 pCi/1 5 pCi/1. pCi/l Results r7a Non -Mandatory Parameters' MSL** .Total,Alkalinity mg/1 Dissolved Solids 500 mg/l Specific Conductance Micromhos Iron 0.3 mg/l Manganese 0.05 mg/1 Copper 1.0 mg/l Zinc 5.0 mg11 Molybdenum �^ mg/l Total Hardness as CaCO3 mg/1 CaI Ciim , as'-. CaCO3 ': mg/1 Magnesium Chloride Sulfate 125 mg/1 .250 mg/l 250 mg/l Results Watez Temperature `.:, Lanttelier Index * Maximum contaminate Level ** Maximum suggested Level * BDL a Below detection limit JC:�.i! . _�:I- � �L.if- 1 - i � 1=�� .+J JI-�7-�i iJ•��.�.1.1 GYS-31 ►teu- vv�w nuv w� ruw 1 1..v l 11w—V vr� 1 STATE OF COLORADO, OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER Per tow THIS IS A C0 F THE WELL LOG El TO BRAD FOSTER 1 91. 1. WELL PERMCT NUMBER 039410-F THAT WAS MAII 2 CWNER NAME(S) Vail Associates Inc. Mailing Address F. 0. So-x-T—ON City, St. ZIP Vail. Colorado - 81657 Phone ( 303) 476-5601 JuIV 10 3. WELL LOCATION AS DRILLED:SW 1 ,l1/4 SEti4, Sec. 12 Tbvp.iA DISTANCES FROM SEC. LINES: 1650 445 n. from South Sec. One. and fL from East Sec. line. CF '-- (nom at .au„) ("a or weso' SUBDIVISION: LOT BLOCK STREET ADDRESS AT WELL LOCATION: end of Red Sandst�,np- g8 1 W FIUN(3(UNIT) 4. GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION 9350 ft. DRILLING OATS COMPLETED June IS 1991 TOTAL DEPTH METHOD 52 IL DEPTH COMRL TED 52 ft. To (ft) is 5. GEOLOGIC LOG: D*M o w "m d uoww (Nm star. Color. Wow Lambe) B. HOLE DIAM. (In.) From (ft) 9 � 6 1,.,_ 7. PLAIN CASING OD On) Kind Wall size 7 steel .231 PERF. C SING: Screen Slat 5_2 16 steel .188 From(ft) Taft) 0_ .36 3_ b 52 CKER PLACEMENT: to eet - tili Water located at and 42 feet IL FILTER PACK Material Size Interval 1Q GROLI TING RECORD: Materlai Amount Density cement 100# 1 rval Placement 30 gravit REMARKS: 1 DISINFECTION: TVpq Arnt. Used 12 WELL TEST DATA: Check box I Tort Data Is submitted on Supplemental Form. TESTING METHOD air Static Level 26 ft. DatG/TiM0 measured June 15, 1991 , Production Pumping level fL DaWnme meaaured , Too length Remarks ei20 gpm. ( .) 3. 1 haw wd ItN aMm.w ww de hwein and krww"oont rft tllMwf. and OW dW we Vw m my iawAMadpa. (Perm am to SeWo of Taft SUMM a harwn aor dam p wpify in the soi c d►W*w WW In p s a okm t nftftlw w I CONTRACTOR Golden Eaale Drill' g CorD. Phone (303 668-35 Mailing Address x 4 r risco, W10raC10 3 Name/Title (Please type or print) Sig a Joe W. Shalton, President +S 1 104 (13)Ua C.P.a, ttla fnaking Lic. No. 388 Date July 10, 1991 r�> 1. Form No. OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER OWS•25 COLORADO DIVISION OF WATER RE,300CE8 Jib Cunt misl H100•, VJ14 Owmen 6t. Denver. OW616" 40M (iti7t 6Ah18i!! AP.. EPI.1S8T VAIi, ASSOCIATES INC Y 0 BOX i VATL, CO 81007 PERMIT TO USE AN EK9MN12 WELL Wrr.1.i. PEAMIT NUMBER r ...0.312.40 --• - plV. � . Wiy. - .WQ 5a. DEB. BASIN ., .. MD P>-519 YLLY9LELt--ASA= LIC COUNTY_ ?ABLE sw 1/4 _ 62; -, 1 j4 8eotlon .12 Rango 8Z !GP �� 8 P.M. f�l 1630 D . Ft" from South _ SeL41on Una ... Pt. from _.:.— seotion l.Ine ISSUANCS OF THIS PIRMIIT DQES NOT CONFER A WATER IR113HT 1) This will shall be used In such a way W to +sauna no M411oriai Injury to existing water rights, The Issuance of the permit does not &sour* the appiloant that no Injury will ocour to another vested water right or preclude another owner of s vested welter right from seeking relief In a civil court action. 2) Approved for the use of an existing well constructed as a rnonftoring well, file no. MH0885. 3) Approved pursuant to CRS 37.20-137(2) on the condition that t1114 well Is operated In accordance with thq Vall Associates/Piney Lake Ranoh substitute water supply piaM ttppr'oved by the State Engineer an June 27,1901, .The well shall not Ce opandod unloes h It Included In a substitute watel' supply plan appmwed.by the State Engineer or a plant for augment&tlon &pprovid by the water ooum The subloot water suppy plant is currently valid through June 10,1092, and If not extended or if a court approved pliko for augnistttatfon-Is not in operation , this well perrrtk Is null end void and diversion of ground water from thla w4I1 muss 04s* Immedrately. - 4) The maximum pumping rate shalt not exceed 25 GPM. 3) The average annual amount of ground water to !'ao epproplated shall not exoeed 23 acre-feet. 6) A totalizing flow meter must be Installed on the well and maintained In good working order. Permvent records of all diversions must be maintained by the well pwnsr (recorded at least wrsk;y) and suhmltted to the Division Engineer upon request, - 7) The owner shall mark the well In a conspicuous'pisve with well permit numbet'(s), name of the aglilfar, and court case number(s) ass sppropriste. He shall take necessary means and praoautlons to prss irve these markings. k►�'f 03257 JUL4 �9�� XPIRATION DATE ' � � � 1992 Aecalpt No...-_ -- DATE ISSUED�..,.r�,...._... wR�•5•go',, 16 C060RA00 DIVIWON OF WATER R:SOURCES 4 RF111"i1".!W;.[I 81e Centrnillill Bldq.,1313 Sharman St„ bonver, Colorado 80203 ICY C. Is rJ 1 P� APP IC4.T N fOR Application must be compete whiff* I X) A PERMIT TO USE WROUND WATEM srr.i,.;, ' applicable, Type or (X) A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A WELL PUMP print In BLACK FOR; (X) A PERMIT TO INSTALL A (a ►W, Nv uvorsrtrikes ar ernsur•s unl.n iR►tidlod. I ? ROLA.CCM91NIT PON AIA. _ ....---__...—�..--- t ) OTHER,._,._____.-.-._..—�..-• WATER COURT CASE N0,—=CM-2:i—--•-..--• (1) APPLICANT • moiililg address NAME A t e R , I=-'- ...r.. (su�•I TILEPHONENO.._ County..,..�,S,it v 1a— - . ._�...-- ,.....$fei.—.,,,,,,b of the 32 ..« Twp, -S , Rno..ALZ...,... . ,SIIL ,'_� iN, til 1 i, WI (3j $ QJE AND WILLQEA Proposed maximum pumping rats wprtt) ,.. _ Average annual yinuullt of Ground water 10 be *pproprlated (Iiwfliet) I ....�w�. — -�-• -�--- Nurnuor of acres to Iro irrigated:.. 1----.....•-- 11taposed total depth (feet):.,.. w..--.I it ti . Aquifer gragnd water Is to be obtsinad from; AlluViUM Owner's wail dnignaiIom ..- 24i aaaytW011 arsntlNi W JIB TO BE 9D FOR, ( I HOUSEHOLD USE ONLY • nil 4694tion (0) (X) DOMESTIC (I) ( I INDUSTRIAL (51 IX) LIVESTOCK (2) ( )C IRAIGATION is; (XI CQMMEnefAL (of ( I MUNICIPAL (8) DETAIL 1HE USE ON SACK IN (" II (4) 01iL.(,�.9 Name___"V lead -__t<a L A6100ted r,,,,_, City r..� -•-- Telephone No. Lla, No. ..rw Ft7R OFFICE USE ONLY; 00 NG7 WHI7E iN THIS CQ(.0 , Receipt No. 1 ��...-. •-- -- Of AP Thle well shall tea Used In such Is Wry 11 to Oalr.ur no material Injury to existing wotar rights. The issuance of the permit does nut assure tilt applicant that no injury will opowr to another vested water right or preclude another owelar of a vostod water right from seeking reiilN In a civil Court action. oATE ISSUEd•----.,.-.- JXPIRATION BATE by_--. .._.�Y.�...�.. � -.. I.D. _�� COUNTY _ _L. C- - _ _ -�• 1J 'rlI • --Z_ _ --r-am . -I I.-!- - 1 L..% JU-L r-. 4, _f. on (s) IONL E PRCIPO Ea VVILL or l 160 4•04 an whIch the wo:er will b* iwtiea must— be IndiCSICd On the dlear+m 12410w. We the CENTER SECT10N (T wcllon, 840 stroll for the wall 10CRICn, t MILE, 6280 atditt' --il ) fYORTW , f i �.. ) .(w. 4-.}- i I r Tw .w i I i i TI1v scale of the dlegraill Is 2 Inches * 1 Mile Each small squye represen4r 4044rat. WATER COIJIVALlNty TASL! fftrtutitfeti PIVrIVWJ An asn foul r aym t 4vt of ii,rd t foo* dtap t euble feet par MCCrtd icfrl ... 440 eatlunr hilt ntinutt (#am$ A famliy of 0 will rogviry appruximsttly f AerO•fpat of *11tr pit yadr f eare•feat ... 43.-�60 coma lost ... 325,000 guilent, 1,000 slur pumped eonttnuoueiy fur one Aar produa.t 4.42 ova -fool. (6) ThLaE-LL MUST QGATEQ RELCIw ' ny distances fir",sectlnn Ines. 4 S 0 — it, f►vm _. Sough _zec line path ar 14=.._. fl frorn _ra or w.►tl sec. line (set L 0 T— .01LOCic .�- .FILINO e= .. SUBDI Y ISION (7) 7jlA�.�T of ,�w81911 MILL —WILL BE I&MATEb 0wrtor*4.L j of No. of acref..5.8..�._.�..,,.,,,..._._. Will this beDWIVE, tila only well on this tPJ00.YJA — (a) t Pc UQ..QA1IN a PAb4RAiVl Pia!n Caelwy , 6 in. from to..29 ft. .....1...._.In frram tt. to 4Y 40 ,...ft. Petforoled t:anfnq 4 �,. In. from 4r.40 —ft, to100 ft, .— in. fmtr `__... ft. to.—... fit, anO sllreat on fmrn aid watt wid pons tar lugging Ic: X.A. (10) LAND O&St ICH g.8QWNQ WATER WIL 111- .t_4161' --- - - 0wnar(tj:—Qt2, xrld Ce 120411VAX_��Y.,r..A�..'lF1tJe Leegol d�etoriovom. 4arC0�-dL. land, 'In_thwm..t4-- a N.. at ti3a 6th FM ti 1 I2E .EiI!'w1.1,�1V of shy ued Of grownil water: Foubehold usa Illtd donwstic walls must Indlaaw tVpv of SHH>ossl eY l=Lv fit$,. TenthtlA ba ng 4ses for drinkiingr washing AM sanitdt:iQAt jivestook uses and landscape irrigation. A septic tank leach field system wi ].1 bv• Used for aisposul of (12) OTlf a Wa �R RIaNTS utod on this lard, InCIA1014 WOO, Cjivft PByl V'�Ci^•l 810 Wdt F CtiLrt Cbso Numboty, Typa or tight Used fur Illurposal pasrritt•or. of land oil wl,iolt U*04 -LAN, sBillw.�� ass No, 90CW323 (pond- livestQ'Okr �Z-.ViyaLian (13)THE APPLICANT 6(8) THAT THE INFORMATION SIT FORTH HEREON Is..� TRUE TO THE MT OF MIS KNOWLEDGE, S)CAr.4 ruaE or ANT rr.ANYrSJ CLEAN WATER IS NOT JUST AN ACT ---WITH A UVPS-UV PURIFIER BACTERIA=FREE WATER CAN BE THE REAL THING IN YOUR HOME OR FACILITY. EP-1S & EP-1S REMOTE PURIFIERS From a wide range of off -the -shelf models for home and institutional applications. UVPS provides the bacteria -killing-. power of non-polluting ultraviolet energy to purify potable water without chemicals. UV does not affect taste and costs only pennies to operate. �,�^«` -`_ UVPS products feature: (UVPS) has over a half century of experience . Laboratory -certified measured UV dosage in UV purification of process water, waste >35.000 µws/cm' water, potable water, and other susceptible • Continuous monitoring of UV intensity fluids. The company pioneered UV dose and lamp function measurement, and holds patents for UV • Complete performance guarantee intensity monitoring and in -place cleaning . Simple -to -use in -place chemical cleaning systems. Now this technology is available for . 5-year contact chamber warranty home and institution. C �Pr r ,;R 0-am 59 Ali; ma i�c TOOarm D A �r NC N Nam � �A 3 -4 Z r y C N �l � Dtl �1 m( rnm Z� Z g .aco F z 05 m P.r v� _ r � c A ri r o v_ m c 0 z ZN rn ;Kv O Z v� x z rno N 0 c� �_ oc rn cC v corn o�orr r I '90 -vrn n m z �, rn C z '9 rn % rn r) ,. -;arn rn n ox do va �c C)rn o .i o� rnD ED o. rn m D -r-1 2 ALPINE COMMUNICATION RECORD ENGINEERING INC PROJECT: PLNEY L-A1C.E WhTEL S151"EM _ JOB N0. PERSON CONSULTEO: �O DDPfT`�fGTti�t'y FIRM:E A�6�hM ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO. PURPOSE OF CONTACT: 12E1DL>E6T Eep me7uLt>,,-j or' PeAWTN6S DATE: -7Ay BY: 6Lt"'TI1V Df -"GAMER COPIES TO: ,h y/t'1E,LleY E/96tEGo HEA[T/Y aft' �J'�'le yrJ.yfJ d.A. 0ME140RANOUR %3TELEPHONE CONFERENCE OMEETING MINUTES OTRANSMITTAL ssass=s=s=sa==s==a=aaassssss3ss=ssssssasaas=sss=sss=a=s==--s== 3 assss==s HEREWIs3ss-ass=ss===ass (]TNE FOLLOWING WAS DISCUSSED: pTRANSMITTEO HEREWITHs Dom. sle�Ms._, 400E-2 LET7m-e _ �X PL.4 6V 106 5c,0 a /9'iV D 0P1,'ey6tQ6- of ifcV 6V- , 2. Pt�4>IIESF rp,e OF 0e I-syIoU&T OW 0 �6= �SY IN&7 ea6o DEBT Y&, -r-W n11N1,V6- Ya pipoBI.C` �, l�NRLYS/s of cvi9r��oew� A9�rie;vt,.r►-rt� �. GflEniiuqC Z,v1reerE7 i�-,��c.?'s�S . r %, Grit mZ0 S y5 re* sGN EN�J i9 >~1G sfjcjc:7r-s O F pc,,f vs �� s/lrEPe,-,w V/G/N/rY / G.A ✓, ETC . Lz4X�o� �LvELrNE), :C<- YOU N-MF- A+j. , a VEST,cr.�s. 'PL.t EC C^ it,. , Edwards Business Center • P.O. Box 97 • Edwards. Colorado 81632 0 . 303/949«4640.303/926-3373 L ALPINE COMMUNICATION RECORD ENGINEERING INC PROJECT: P/nli5Y ,E1(/tq!� 94WG9 Joe NO. PERSON CONSULTED: ,AY /yfjSrRZ FIRM: IS: -f- CO A'� ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO. PURPOSE OF CONTACT: 66-0-1G &- NV DATE: `6(tilt 111 BY: 66,6NW � L1�/l - _ COPIES TO:. j1X<VAW/Y 114, ' j?—WW aS76 je IuES7E2A SLOPS ❑HEMORANDUM 10TELEPHONE CONFERENCE QMEETING MINUTES QTRANSMITTAL asaaaasaasasssssssassaasaasasasssasasssssaassasaxaasasssx--asssssssasssssxsassssassssssssssssa OTHE FOLLOIIING MAS DISCUSSED: OTRANSMITTED MEAE1fITHs ce),vs-P, cT A 5F-f77r.7Wic A 57nmop� J>,e110ydp Fee- xoUl—p P5.. _ _ _TEE ��Z!�Sr7J frG/i+vs o,e 3 SEP NTH L�+�f i�Et AS W/a 4ch-e, RECEIVE EAGLE. COUNTY COMINIUNHY UEVELOPIKENT Edwards Business Center a P.O. Box 97 • Edwards, Colorado 81632 • 303n494640 a 303/926-3373 y,, SiT.. A?F:.I-A 1G:: " 4003 DATE 0: APPROCr.1 September 30 1991 APPLICAI:T: Vail Associates Inc ADDRESS: P. 0 Box 7 Vail Colorado 81658 PHONE: 103/476-5601 CO::SI:LTT_::v ..::G=::..z.. Alpine Engineering Inc. ADDRESS: P. O. Box 97, Edwards Colorado 81632 PHC::E: 303/926-3373 FROPCSED C:tU.1:GE FROM APPROVED A?PLICATION: It is proposed to reduce the capacity, and permitted use of the Piney River Ranch septic system to 4447 gallons per day, from the previously approved 6670 GPD. REASON AIENDMEN'T IS BEING REQUESTED: Actual water consumption, based uvon water meter readings. indicates that actual water use is less than 4447 GPD. Since it was difficult to estimate design flows to the septic system to be used tor --- the ISDS permit, an overly conservative amount of consumption was used. Actual data shoos that the septic system can be reduced in size, and still have adequate capacity to handle actual flows (see attached letter). Date: 840/ -Z Clpnn PnlTnpr Rrn4prt Manager Signature of Applicant Typed Name and Title STAFF RECO:L"E".D11 1C:: District Engineer Planning Urit Signature Approval Approval Denial Denial Signature Any recommendation of denial shall be accompanied by a memo stating the reason(s) for the recommendation and proposing alternative course(s) of action for the applicant and/or the division.. PROCEDURE: The request to amend an approved site application shall be completed and signed by the applicant or the permit writer in accordance with the criteria set forth above. The request will then be forwarded to the District Engineer and the Planning Unit for evaluation.* The request shall be evaluated for: 1. Eligibility for amendment based on the criteria contained in this policy 2. Consistency between the proposal and effluent limits applicable to the facility 3. Continued consistency of the site application, as amended, with the regulations for site applications for domestic wastewater treatment works. ie: if treatment plant site is expanded, evidence of control of site, impact on flood plain etc. 4. Comments of Review entities. Reviewers will note their recommendation and sign the application. If the recommendation is for denial, the reviewer shall attach a memo stating the reason(s) for the recommendation and proposing course(s) of action for the applicant and or the division. The planning Unit will prepare a memo explaining the proposed amendment and attach any comments from staff or review agencies. The Planning Unit will also draft a letter of approval or denial for the Division Director's signature if staff members are in agreement as to the =eco=ended action. If staff is unable to reach agreement, the above referenced memo will address the opposing positions. The Division action will be dictated by the Division iirector after meeting and/or discussing the conflicting positions with appropriate personnel. The letter of approval or denial will then be prepared by the Planning unit. sM► C lorado Water Quality Control Division Prix,-• r,;,. WATT R QUJA1 17 Policies O"L Procedures PURPOSE: . I;,:k ,,ata::9;:: Approved By:, — Elective Date: 15, I (18 Revision No.: Revision Date: P-ME`TDMENT OF PREVIOUSLY APPROVED SITE APPLICATIONS To permit minor modifications to previously approved site applications when those modifications will neither increase the hydraulic or organic treatment capacity nor alter the treatment process of the treatment plant. POLICY/PROCEDURE: It is the policy of the Water Quality Control Division, that certain modifications to proviously approved_ site applications shall be handled through an amendment process rather than through the site application process. The amendment'of the site approval will be instigated by the holder of a valid site approval or by the Water Quality Control Division, as dictated by the type of modification proposed. 1. Amendments Initiated by Applicant a) Addition of or improvements to disinfection b) Addition of or improvements to dechlorination c) -Addition of or improvements to plant headworks d) Modification of identified service area e) Decrease in hydraulic and/or organic design capacity f) Change to a discharge method and location which has previous site approval g) Filters or clarifiers for the removal of TSS only 2. Amendments Initiated by Division a) A change in discharge location which does not involve a change in method b) A change in treatment requirements (effluent limits) resulting from a change in stream classification/standards or wasteload allocation which does not result in a change of treatment process. c) A decrease in capacity resulting from plans and specifications review and/or discharge permit review and evaluation Telefax Numbers: Main Building/Denver (303) 322-9076 4210 East llth Avenue Ptarmigan Place/Denver Denver, Colorado 80220-3716 (303) 320-1529 ROY ROMER First National Bank Building/Denver Governor Phone (303) 320 8333 (303) 355-6559 COLORAW DEPARTMENT OFAHEALTH September 30, 1991 Mr. Brad Foster Vail Associates, Inc. P.O. Box 7 Vail, CO 81.658 RE: Site Application #4003 Eagle County Dear Mr. Foster: Grand Junction Office JOEL KOHN (303) 248-7198 Interim Executive Director Pueblo Office (719) 543-8441 The Water Quality Control Division has reviewed and evaluated your site application and supporting documentation for an ISDS type domestic wastewater treatment works to be located in the South 1/2 of the SE 1/4 of Section 12, T4S, R81W to serve recreational activities at the Piney River Ranch and to discharge via soil absorption systems. We find your application to be in conformance with the Water Quality Control Commission's "Regulations for Site Applications for Domestic Wastewater Treatment Works." Therefore, the site application is approved with the following conditions listed below. I. Based upon application information, the system design will be for: Maximum Daily Flow Capacity - 6,670 gpd Organic Loading Capacity - 20.4 lbs. BODS/day Treatment Processes to be Used - Septic tanks with 3 soil absorption fields Desivon for values in excess of those contained in condition 1 above or failure to comply with any other conditions contained herein will render this approval void and another site application will have to be processed. 2. This site approval will expire one year from the date of this letter if the construction of the project has not commenced by that date. If expiration occurs, you must apply for a new site approval. Construction is defined as entering into a contract for the erection or physical placement of materials, equipment, piping, earthwork or buildings which are to be a part of a domestic wastewater treatment works. 3. The design (construction plans and specifications) for the treatment works must be approved by the Division and Eagle County prior to commencement of construction and all construction change orders initiating variances from the approved plans and specifications must be approved by the Division and Eagle County. 0 printed on recyded paper Grand Junction Regional Office ROY ROMER 222 S. 6th Street, Room 232 Governor Grand Junction, Colorado 81501-2768 Telefax Number: (303) 248-7198 JOEL KOHN Interim ExecutD' t v COLORn� nD ie lrec or ADO Steamboat Springs Office DEPARTMENT Steamboat Square, 410 S. Lincoln Ave. Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 OFAHEALTH October 3, 1991 Glen Palmer, P.E. Alpine Engineering, Inc. P.O. Box 97 Edwards, CO 81632 Re: Plans and Specifications Review, Piney River Ranch, Vail Associates, Eagle County Dear Glen: The referenced plans and specifications have been reviewed by this office in accordance with the Colorado Individual Sewage Disposal System Guidelines and have been found to be in conformance except as noted below. The design is hereby approved and subject to the following conditions: 1. The facility owner's registered professional engineer must certify at the completion of construction that the treatment works was constructed according to plans, specifications, and significant amendments thereto approved by the Division. Significant amendments are considered those which change the treatment process, the capacity of the treatment works, or the ability to operate the treatment works. 2. "As built" plans, showing the agreed -upon change to the septic tank shall be submitted to this office. This review does not relieve the owner from compliance with all local regulations prior to construction nor from responsibility for proper engineering, construction, and operation of the facility. Please retain this letter for your permanent records. Please contact me in the Steamboat Springs office at (303)879-7479 if you have any questions. inter Jim Chubrilo, P.E. District Engineer Water Quality Control Division RECEIVED cc: Ray Merry, Eagle County Environmental Health, Communit Development Dept. n r.�' o 8 19�1 EAGLE COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT a prinledon recycledpnper r. Colorado Department of Health Water Quality Control Division Steamboat Springs Office DESIGN REVIEW MEMORANDUM Date: October 3, 1991 To: Design Review File 't. Through:, Dick Bowman From: Jim Chubrilo, Field Support Section Subject: Design Review for Pitney River Ranch, Vail Associates, Eagle County I have reviewed the subject plans and specifications and find them in compliance with the Commission's "Design Criteria for Wastewater Treatment Works" except for the following documented and approved variances: Site Application # -003 was approved on October 3, 1991 for this project with a design capacity of 6,670 gpd, 20.4 lbs. BOD per day and other parameters" listed: NA. The capacity for this facility as established by this review is 6,670 gpd and 20,4 lbs. BOD per day and is consistent with the capacity approved in the'site' application approval. The attached design review file contains: _ Copy of site application approval letter X Design review calculation► sheets Any design review checklists _ Variance requests with justifications X Copy of approval transmittal letter (Other) One copy of the stamped and signed plans and specifications has been kept for the Steamboat Springs Office. All other stamped and signed copies are to be returned' to the applicant with the approval letter. ALPINE ENGINEERING INC October 25, 1991 Mr. Roger Boyd Eagle County Health Department P.O. Box 179 Eagle, CO 81631 RE: Piney River Ranch Septic System Dear Mr. Boyd, Please find attached: A) Revised area #1 site plan (as -built). B) Revised area #1 absorption trench calculations. C) As built septic tank plans, showing the agreed upon revision. The absorption area for area #1 was increased as a result of substituting the Hancor "Contactor" unit for the "Infiltrator" units. We will follow up with as-builts of areas #2 and #3 when they are constructed next spring (1992). Please contact me if you need additional information or have any questions. Sincerely, Glenn Palmer, PE GP/lm cc: Jim Chubrillo, District Engineer Jack Hunn, Vail Associates Attachment Edwards Business Center • P.O. Box 97 • Edwards, Colorado 81632 •303/926-3373 • FAX 303/926-3390 Grand Junction Regional Office ROY ROMER 222 S. 6th Street, Room 232 Governor Grand Junction, Colorado 81501-2768 Telefax Number. (303) 248-7198 COLORADO Steamboat Springs office DEPARTMENT Steamboat square. 410 S. Lincoln Ave. Steamboat Springs, Co 80487 OFAHEALTH October 3, 1991 Glen Palmer, P.E. Alpine Engineering, Inc. P.O. Box 91 Edwards, CO 81632 JOEL KOHN Interim Executive Director Re: Plans and -Specifications Review, Piney River Ranch, Vail Associates, Eagle County Dear Glen: The referenced plans and specifications have been reviewed by this office in accordance with the Colorado Individual Sewage Disposal System Guidelines and have been found to be in conformance except as noted below. The design is hereby approved and subject to the following conditions: 1. The facility owner's registered professional engineer must certify at the completion of construction that the treatment works was constructed according to plans, specifications, and significant amendments thereto approved by the Division. Significant amendments are considered those which change the treatment process, the capacity of the treatment works, or the ability to operate the treatment works. 2. "As built" plans, showing the agreed -upon change to the septic tank shall be submitted to this office. This review does not relieve the owner from compliance with all local regulations prior to construction nor from responsibility for proper engineering, construction, and operation of the facility. Please retain this letter for your permanent records. Please contact me in the Steamboat Springs office at (303)879-7479 if you have any questions. inter y, Jim Chubrilo, P.E. District Engineer Water Quality Control Division cc: Ray Merry, Eagle County Environmental Health, Community Development Dept. 0 p.mad— recycle pp.. ° ?-GvlgE7c> Iola , /fAICY IeII16-e P-4wICoq *� ° /5 �� /z�J&T � Qx 11 5F ^ 05 Paw _ � ^' } �i ALPINE ENGINEERING INC April 30, 1992 Mr. Jack Hunn Vail Associates, Inc. P.O. Box 7 Vail, CO 81658 Dear Mr. Hunn, M EAGLE COUNTY C0-j1,P,UN!TY DEVELOPMENT As discussed with Roger Boyd (Eagle County Health Department) today, porta potties will be required at Piney Lake until Phase 2 of the septic system is constructed. I mentioned to Roger that Vail Associates felt that the predicted sewage flow per permit was much more than actual use, based upon experience from last summer. He is checking with Ray Merry to see if actual data could be used to reduce the sewage flow calculations. He does not have a problem waiting until the 4th of July to obtain data, as long as porta potties are used, and as long as the system is constructed, per plan, or reduced (with appropriate approvals) by September 1, 1992. If you have any questions, please call. Sincerely, Glenn Palmer, PE GP/lm cc: Roger Boyd, Eagle County Edwards Business Center • P.O. Box 97 • Edwards, Colorado 81632 • 303 926-3373 • FAX 303 926-3390 ALPINE ENGINEERING INC May 13, 1992 Mr. Roger Boyd Eagle County P.O. Box 179 Eagle, CO 81631 Dear Mr. Boyd, As discussed with you on Wednesday, May 6,1992, records (from last summer) provide information about the number of guests that were served at the Piney Ranch facility. This information clearly indicates that actual sewage flows will be substantially less than those predicted and used for the design of the septic system. The predicted flows are greatly influenced by the restroom facility, which was originally estimated using "public restroom" flows, and reduced slightly as a result of the low flush toilets which were installed at the Piney Ranch facility. In addition, Vail Associates found that guests begin to arrive around 11:00 A.M., and generally have departed by 7:00 or 8:00 P.M., which gives only 8 to 9 hours of use every day, not the 10 hours previously estimated. Experience has shown that group and day visitors to not have coincidental peak uses: if a large group of guests are using the Piney Lake facilities, large groups of visitors do not use the facility, and vice versa, as groups are only scheduled to use the ranch during non - peak public use periods. It is desired to construct a septic system of adequate capacity to handle actual peak flows. Actual peak flows could easily be obtained by providing a separate meter for the horse troughs which would be subtracted from the meter measuring all water used. The meter will be read on a daily basis. Piney Ranch does not open to the public until June 20th and peak flows are expected to occur on the 4th of July weekend, which would provide data to verify the design of the septic system. You have indicated that porta potties should not be placed on the site during the test period, to make sure that data accurately depicts the peak flows. The test period for monitoring flows is proposed to be from June 20th to July 6th, to make sure we get data from at least 2 peak weekends in July. Porta potties will be provided, if required per data obtained during this test period, to be used until the septic system can be constructed and enlarged if required per actual data obtained. We understand that construction has to begin by September 30, 1992, or a contract for the construction of the septic system has to be awarded by September 30, 1992. Please let us know what is required in order to carry out this testing procedure, and if you have any other concerns. Since --rely, Utt� Glenn Palmer, PE GP/lm 1 1. MAY 14 1992 EAGLE COUNTY COMMUNITY UEVELOPMENT Edwards Business Center • P.O. Box 97 • Edwards, Colorado 81632 • 303/926-3373 • FAX 303/926-3390 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT (303) 323-8730 EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO May 21, 1992 Glenn Palmer Alpine Engineering, Inc. P.O. Box 97 Edwards, CO 81632 Dear Mr. Palmer, 500 BROADWAY P.O. BOX 179 EAGLE. COLORADO S 1631 FAX (303) 328-7207 Since our meeting concerning potential modifications to the Piney River Ranch sewage disposal system, I have had an opportunity to discuss this matter with Jim Chubrilo, Colorado Department of Health,(CDH) District Engineer. After tentative discussion with Jim, it appears that modifications to the proposed system can be made without repeating the site application procedure. In addition, Jim indicated we could channel communications with the CDH through him. I agree with your proposal to begin a test period for monitoring water flows during the peak use period from June 20th to July 6th. In addition, I think it would be beneficial to continue the monitoring program throughout the summer. Data collected during the test period would determine whether or not the use of Aorta potties would be necessary to alleviate any "stress" on the existing absorption field. With the monitoring program in place through the summer, we should be able to take a "wait and see" position to determine a more accurate sizing of the second absorption field. It is the County's intent that an adequate sewage disposal system, based of accurate design flow data, be constructed. Therefore, if the data supports a reduction in the total amount of absorption area necessary, the Environmental Health Division will assist Vail Associates in amending the permit. Vail Associates, Inc. Creators and Operators of Vail and Beaver Creep' Resorts July 14, 1992 Mr. Glenn Palmer Alpine Engineering P.O. Box 97 Edwards, CO 81632 RE: Piney River Ranch - Phase II Septic System Design WATER CONSUMPTION DATA Dear Glenn: As agreed, Vail Associates, Inc. personnel have documented the water consumption at Piney River Ranch for the period of June 20, 1992 through July 7, 1992. Unfortunately, we were not able to read the meters on a daily basis and did not read the deductive meter until June 23, 1992. However, we do have water consumption data representing 14 days of operations at the ranch. The attached chart summarizes the gross quantity of water consumed, less the quantity of water used to water the horses and to irrigate the lawn, for a net quantity of water processed through our two existing leach fields. We trust that this information is acceptable and sufficient to conclude that the originally proposed third leach field will no longer be required. Please contact me if you have any questions or require additional information. Sincerely, VAIL� ASSO cc: Tim Kehoe S, INC. Jack P. H n, Director Real sta Development Post Office Box 7 • Vail, Colorado 81658 • USA - (303) 476,5601 Piney River Ranch - Phase II JDH:7/14/92 Septic System Design WATER CONSUMPTION DATA 45 Date Main Meter Gallons Deduct Gallons Net Water Meter Consumed/Day 6/20 180,400 _ - 6/22 183,600 3,200 -- -- -- 6/23 184,900 1,300 3,438 -- -- 6/24 186,600 1,700 ? 4,448 1,010 690/day 6/26 187,600 1,000 4,702 254 746/2days = 373/day 6/30 203,100 15,500 14,457 9,755 j 5745/4days = 1436/day 7/01 208,000 4,900 18,697 4,240 660/day 7/06 248,000 40,000 52,780 34,083 5917/5days = 1183/day 7/07 256,000 8,000 59,807 7,027 973/day SUMMARY 1. Test period valid from June 23, 1992 through July 7, 1992, as deduct meter results were not recorded from June 20, 1992 through June 22, 1992. Therefore, the test period is 14 days. 2. Daily average gross water consumption is 75,600 gallons/14 days = 5,400 gallons/day. 3. Daily average water consumption for horses and the irrigation system is 56,369 gallons/14 days = 4,026 gallons/day. 4. Daily average net water consumption routed through the septic system is 19,231 gallons/14 days = 1,374 gallons/day. Note: Approximately 20,000 SF of new sod was installed on July 1 and 2. A significant .quantity of water was used to water the sod. NTH* 15 ft rE�iPOE'/'>� % /��/G�► s�cN 5 y,re,�� �cY ' t0 BE Us4 O T 17VC 5cxo �1��x' DF1, ALPINE ENGINEERING INC July 28, 1992 Mr. Jun Chubrilo Colorado Department of Health 410 South Lincoln Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 Dear Mr. Chubrilo: Upon review of the septic system application, Vail Associates felt that the predicted water use at the Piney River Ranch Project was overly conservative. The predicted sewage flow was based upon the assumption that every toilet and urinal would be flushed every five minutes continuously for 10 hours per day, and a total of 450 persons would visit the Ranch daily. Apparently, not as many persons visit the Ranch as expected, and the restroom is not used as much as expected. The restroom is the largest generator of sewage flow. The first two of three absorption trench areas were constructed, and water use was metered and recorded to determine what the actual use was. This was done over a two and a half week period, from June 20 to July 7: the intent was to obtain data for a peak use weekend, such as the 4th of July. It was agreed that if water use data indicated that the third and last absorption area needed to be constructed, the restrooms would be closed immediately, and porta-potties would be used until the third area could be constructed. The following data indicates that the predicted sewage flow to the system greatly exceeds actual flows, and that only two absorption trench areas are needed to obtain horizontal setback requirements and other design criteria. As discussed with you on 7/28/92, it would be desirable to obtain data regarding the correlation of number of visitors to the amount of water usage. I believe that Vail Associates could obtain data for number of meals served, which could be compared to the water usage, and I have asked Vail Associates to provide this information. Following is a list of conclusions regarding the usage of water at the Piney River Ranch project. (Vail Associates data is attached to the back of this report.) 1. Two peak use weekends were obtained in the test data, June 27th and 28th, and July 4th and 5th. July 4th is one of, if not the highest, use period at Piney River Ranch. Since it is likely that more persons visit Piney River Ranch on the weekends, it may be more appropriate to obtain a peak daily use rate by using a weighted average, for example: From June 26 to June 30, 5745 gallons of water was directed to the septic system. 5745/2 weekend days = 28� prall„o�n� uer day Although the average water use was 1436 gallons over four days, a peak average use on the weekend is likely less than 2873 gallons. (This assumes that there was no use on the other two weekdays.) Similarly, over the 4th of July, the peak use could be determined by: Edwards Business Center • P.O. Box 97 • Edwards, Colorado 81632 •303/926-3373 • FAX 303/926-3390 5917/2.5* days = 2366 gallons per day. * People either got Friday the 30th or Monday the 6th off from work, or a 3-day weekend. 2. Assuming a 150% peak factor for the peak volumes measured, the peak use is (1.50)(2873) _ 4309.5 gallons per day. 3. The original ISDS application was based upon 6670 gallons per day to the absorption trenches. The septic tank discharge was to be split to three separate absorption trench areas, or 6670/3 = 2223 ggpd per area. Since actual flows are much less than previously estimated, two absorption trenches can be constructed, and still provide less discharge to each absorption area than originally designed. original 6670/3 fields = 2223 gpd/field actual 4309/2 fields = 2155 gpd/field 4. Since less effluent is being discharged to each field, horizontal setback requirements will be met. AS -BUILT REVISIONS I visited the Piney River Ranch in May of 1992, during the seasonal high groundwater period. During this visit, it was determined that the original location of the proposed absorption area #2 had a shallow groundwater condition. Two alternate absorption areas were considered: one was eliminated when horizontal setback requirements were field measured. The absorption area was moved south to a flat bench area (approximately 3' to 4' of fall across the area). SOIL PROFILE HOLE A soil profile was dug to 8' deep next to the absorption area, and three percolation tests taken. The soil profile hole consisted of the same well graded, free draining sand that was observed at the other areas. An occasional (2 or 3) 2' to 3' diameter boulders were excavated. PERCOLATION TESTS Percolation tests were performed last year for: AREA #2 AREA #3 REVISED AREA #2 HOLE # AUG. 1991 AUG. 1991 MAY 1992 1. 2.31 3.11 3.19 2. 2.97 2.45 2.84 3. 3.21 2.05 3.05 AVERAGE 2.83 2.54 3.03 MINUTES PER INCH USE 5 MINANCH 5 MINANCH 5 MIN/INCH ABSORPTION TRENCH AREA (Area #2) Area = Q/5 (T**0.5) _ (2223 GPD/5) (5**0.5) = 994 SF l Use Infiltrator system wi 4 eduction factor for trench systems. (994 SF) (.55) = 547 SF 547 SF/3' wide = 182 LF 3 trenches, 10 units @ 6.25' long = 62.5' per trench, or r��e 187.5 LF x 3 = 562.5 SF provided Horizontal Setbacks Area #1 Area #2 Description Min.Req'd Actual Min.Reg.d Actual Springs, wells suction lines 198 240 198 430 Potable water supply line 25 27 25 400 Dwelling, occupied building 20 150 20 400 Property lines 10 180 10 460 Subsoil drains 10 30 10 n/a "Lake, water course, stream 148 -23D 148 -520 Dry gulches 123 140 123 200 Septic tank 10 10 10 330 *** Additional Setbacks Q = 6670/3 = 2223 GPD Additional setback, 8' for each 100 GPD > 100 GPD = 8/100 (2223-1000) = 97.8' say 98' CHECK FOR OVERLAP OF SETBACKS FROM ONE ABSORPTION TRENCH TO THE ADJACENT TRENCH The largest setback requirement is 198' to springs, wells and suction lines. As long as the fields are separated by the sum of this setback, all of the other setbacks will be satisfied as well. DOSING The original dosing tank was designed to dose three absorption areas. If a hole is cut into the separation wall in the dosing tank, and each pump set up to discharge alternately, each of the two fields will receive equal effluent, every other time the pumps discharge. SUMMARY Two absorption areas have been constructed, which have the capacity for a total of 4447. GPD. Based upon actual, metered data, the peak daily use (to the septic system) is 4309.5 GPD. It is recommended that the system be permitted for 4447 GPD, which is the peak flow that the system was designed and constructed to handle. Should you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, �O Glenn Palmer, P.E. GP:sm cc: Ray Merry Jack Hunn M. ALLEN and KATHLEEN R. HEINRICH 1499 PEAK VIEW DRIVE CASTLE ROCK, COLORADO, 80104 (303) 688-1824 Mr. Glenn Palmer, PE Alpine Engineering, Inc. P. O. Box 97 Edwards, Colo, 81632 May 28, 1991 Re: Vail Associates Septic System Permit, Piney Lake, Eagle.Cnty Comment from adjacent land owners. Dear Mr. Palmer: We are returning a signed copy of the signature page from the Above referenced permit. My Wife, Kathleen R. (Marugg) Heinrich is listed on the deed as one of the owners, so I had her sign, after correcting the signature sheet to reflect this. The only Frank Marugg presently on the deed as a joint owner is Frank Patrick Marugg, known as "Pat" of Grand Junction, Colorado. You mentioned that you had talked to Pat Marugg by telephone last week, and he confirmed this over the weekend. You will note that Ms. Heinrich, after consultation with Pat Marugg, has recommended disapproval. This disapproval is based on two factors. First, at some future date, the Denver Water Board is to build a Dam at Piney Lake, and it is our concern that the remnants of a fairly large sewage treatment facility buried beneath the impounded lake will taint the water of that lake, and hence the water which will then bound our property. Second, the present use of Piney Lake by the Denver Water Board (as now leased to Vail Associates) is inconsistent with the purpose for which Piney Lake was acquired by condemnation from the Marugg family a number of years ago. This letter may be made part of the record of your application if necessary. Sincerel , All He' ich C. If- the facility will be located on or adjacent to a site that is owned or, managed by a Federal or State agency, send the agency a copy of this application. D. Recommendation of governmental authorities: Please address the following issues in your recommendation decision. Are the proposed facilities consistent with the comprehensive plan and any other plans for the area, including.the 201 Facility Plan or 208 Water Quality Management Plan, as they affect water quality? If you have any further comments or questions, please call 320-8333, Extension 5272. Recommend Recommend No ate �ooro Di�sangrsoval Comme Signature of Representative Kat leen R. Heinrich(aajacent owner) 2. U.S.F.S (adjacent owner) 3. Board of County Commissioners 4. Local Health ut or ty 5. ty ounty Planning Authority 6. Counci of Governments/Reg onaI Planning 7. State Geologist 8. 11plier of tfe Board. (T� i `�` �`'tri)ons for (For lift stations, the signature of the State Geologia q� treatment plants require all signatures.) I certify that I am familiar with the requirements of the "Regulations for Site Applications For Domestic Wastewater Treatment Works," and have posted the site in accordance with the regulations. An engineering report, as described by the regulations, has been prepared and is enclosed. ' _ Brad W. Foster DATEl��l<1i _�'tc• _�1�� Glenn Palmer Signature of Applicant TYPED NAME a + C. If the facility will be located on or adjacent to a site that is owned or managed by a Federal or State agency, send the agency a copy of this application. D. Recommendation of governmental authorities: Please address the following issues in your recommendation decision. Are the proposed facilities consistent with the comprehensive plan and any other plans for the area, including -the 201 Facility Plan or 208 Water Quality Management Plan, as they affect water quality? If you have any further comments or questions, please call 320-8333, Extension 5272. Recommend Recommend No Date Approval sapproval SISUAture of Representative Mr ran Maru djacent owner) 2. .S.F.S (a jacent owner) 3. Board of County Commissioners 4. Local Health ut or ty 5. City/County Planning Authority 6. Council of Governments/Regionalann ng 7. State Geologist 8. • (For lift stations, the signature of the State Geologisn'srno€�tfequired. (dl��tri)ons for treatment plants require all signatures.) I certify that I am familiar with the requirements of the "Regulations for Site Applications For Domestic Wastewater Treatment Works," and have posted the site in accordance with the regulations. An engineering report, as described by the regulations, has been prepared and is enclosed. _ X'l/2�/�' Brad W. Foster DATE 5/���9� 7 , `L&,� Glenn Palmer Signature of Applicant TYPED NAME C. If the facility will be located on or adjacent to a site that is owned or managed by a Federal or State agency, send the agency a copy of this application. D. Recommendation of governmental authorities: Please address the following issues in your recommendation decision. Are the proposed facilities consistent with the comprehensive plan and any other plans for the area, including the 201 Facility Plan or 208 Water Quality Management Plan, as they affect water quality? If you have any further comments or questions, please call 320-8333, Extension 5272. Recommend Recommend No Date Aggr�_ Disapproval Comma Signature of Representative 1• i. Mr. Frank Marugg (adjacent owner) 2. �+ 'U.S.F.S (adjacent owner) 3. _.. ' Board of County Commissioners 4. Local Health ut or ty y ou an ng Authority 6• sA-Al O 4� T of lovernments/Regional ann ng 7. State Geologist 8. apyer W t r B�ar�i ( pol� �tri)ons for (For lift stations, the signature of the State Geologic a no equ re nP treatment plants require all signatures.) I certify that I am familiar with the requirements of the "Regulations for Site Applications For Domestic Wastewater Treatment Works," and have posted the site in accordance with the regulations. An engineering report, as described by the regulations, has been prepared and is 'enclosed. �i/2� f o►,1 "V Brad W. Foster DATE F;:D / ql (-�Gttit� �`�-tir�'�'�� Glenn Palmer Signature of Applicant TYPED NAME C. If the facility will be located on or adjacent to a site that is owned or managed by a Federal or State agency, send the agency a copy of this application. D. Recommendation of governmental authorities: Please address the following issues in your recommendation decision. Are the proposed facilities consistent with the comprehensive plan and any other plans for the area, including.the 201 Facility Plan or 208 Water Quality Management Plan, as they affect water quality? If you have any further comments or questions, please call 320-8333, Extension 5272. Recommend Recommend No Date A22r� Disapproval Comm Signature of Representative 1. Mr. Frank Marug (adjacent owner) 2. U.S.F.S (adjacent owner) 3 Board of County Commissioners 4. Local Health ut or ty 5. 6. City/County Planning Authority Council ol Governments/ egional Planning 7. sta rogpt E�— 8. . (For lift stations, the signature of the State Geologis nysrnoetrequfrad. ('4* Yetri)ons for treatment plants require all signatures.) I certify that I am familiar with the requirements of the "Regulations for Site Applications For Domestic Wastewater Treatment Works," and have posted the site in accordance with the regulations. An engineering report, as described by the regulations, has been prepared and is enclosed. _ Brad W. Foster DATE ��D%� (/� Glenn Palmer Signature of Applicant TYPED NAME Denver Water Department 1600 West 12th Avenue - Denvi sr, CO 80254 Phone (303) 628-6000 - Telecopier No. (303) 628-6199 June 6, 1991 Mr. Glenn Palmer, P.E. Alpine Engineering, Inc. Edwards Business Center P.O. Box 97 Edwards, CO 81632 Dear Mr. Palmer: Enclosed is the executed copy of the application for site approval for construction of Domestic Wastewater Treatment Works for the Denver Water Department property known as Piney Lake which is leased to Vail Associates, Inc. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 628-6209. Sincerely, F.R. Christie Appraiser -Negotiator FRC/mtl Enclosure N:\WFIFRCIFALbM CONSERVH WATER! r ' e } C. If the facility will -be located on or adjacent to a site that is owned or managed by a -Federal or State agency, send the agency a copy of this application. D. Recommendation of governmental authorities: Please address the following issues in your recommendation decision. Are the proposed facilities consistent with the comprehensive plan and any other plans for the area, including -the 201 Facility Plan or 208 Water Quality Management Plan, as they affect water quality? If you have any further comments or questions, please call 320-8333, Extension 5272. Recommend Recommend No Date Anur,o�val isagproval Comm Signature of Revresentative 1. Mr. Frank Marug (adjacent owner) 2. U.S.F.S (adjacent owner) 3. Board of County omm ss oners 4. Local Health ut or ty 5. City/County Planning Authority 6. Council of Governments/RegioualPlanning 7. State Geologi f' % 8. . .Tim,- 6, 199 ApprovLsH Charles D. S rop. Admin. D n er W t r BEagf (I c`��tri)ons for (For lift stations, the signature of the State Geologist �'s no x�equ re p treatment plants require all signatures.) I certify that I am familiar with the requirements of the "Regulations for Site Applications For Domestic Wastewater Treatment Works," and have posted the site in accordance with the regulations. An engineering report, as described by the regulations, has been prepared and is enclosed. /1,1't'tJ` Brad W. Foster Z0/(2) DATE / �D h� � `lr�t/ Glenn Palmer Signature of Applicant TYPED NAME MEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commissioners/Board of Health FROM: Raymond P. Merry, R.E.H.S. Environmental Health Office DATE: May 28, 1991 RE: Piney Lake Septic System Included in your packet is a Colorado Department of Health application for site approval for construction of a wastewater treatment system at Piney Lake. Vail Associates is doing this in order to facilitate the proper disposal of wastewaters generated from their food service facility already on site. Vail Associates is asking the State to approve of the engineered design submitted. As part of the process, the State requires several signatures to accompany the site application before their review can begin. Also, our regulations require the Board of Health to review such designs. Therefore, I am asking that you consider signing the site application and mark the "No Comment" blank on the form enclosed as to not imply approval of other planning issues.which..will be before you within the next couple months. I have reviewed the design, on behalf of the Board of Health, and will likely recommend approval of the system to the State. Please call with any questions at extension 730. RM/mk APPLICATION POR INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PERMIT ENMONMENTAL HEALTH OFFICE - EAGLE COUNTY Number: P. 0. BOX 179' EAGLE, COLORADO 81631 949-5257 Vail 328-7311 Eagle 927-3823 Basalt PER41T APPLICATION! FEE $150.00 1 PERCOLATION TEST FEE S125.00 NAME OF OWNER: DENVER WATER BOARD MAILING ADDRESS: 1600 West h AvP_� nanvar, rn 80954 PHONE: Jo3-628-600n NAVE OF APPLICANT (If different from owner): VAIL ASSOCIATES. INC. ADDRESS: P.O. Box 7, Vail, CO 81658 PHONE: �t���t76_s6nt DESIGN ENGINEER OF SYSTEM (If applicable): ALPINE ENGINEERING, INC. ADDRESS: P.O. Box 97, Edwards, CO 81632 PHONE: 303-926-3371 PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR INSTALLATION OF SYSTEM: EWING CONSTRUCTION LICENSED INSTALLER: (x ) YES ( ) NO ADDRESS: P.O. Box 941, Avon, Co 8162o PHONE: 926-2379 PERMIT APPLICATION IS FOR: ( x) NEW INSTALLATION ( ) ALTERATION ( ) REPAIR LOCATION OF PROPOSED INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM: Physical Address: pINEy RIVER RANcg- 6 miles due north of Vail Parcel Number: Lot Size: 68.3 acres +L Legal Description:Sl/z,SE 1/4 Section 12, T4S R81W,_6rh P-M_ EnQIr- County, ED BUILDING OR SERVICE TYPE (Check applicable category): Residential - Single Family ( ) Residential - Fourplex ( ) Residential - Duplex ( X) Commercial (Type) Kitchen, Public Restroom ( ) Residential - Triplex + shower & washer for 12 employees NUMBER OF PERSONS: NUMBER OF BEDROOMS: WASTE TYPES Check applicable categories): Commercial or Institutional ( ) Dwelling ( ) Non -Domestic Wastes ( ) Transient Use ( ) Garbage Disposal ( X) Dishwasher or hand wash ( x) Automatic Washer (clothes) ( ) Spa Tub ( X ) Other (Specify): public restroom kitchenfarility, shower for 12 employees TYPE OF INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PROPOSED: x Septic Tank Composting Toilet ( ) Incineration Toilet Vault Privy ( ) Greywater ( ) Chemical Toilet ( ) Pit Privy ( ) Aeration Plant ( ) Recycling, Portable Use ( ) Other ( ) Recycling, Other Use WILL EFFLUENT BE DISCHARGED DIRECTLY INTO WATERS OF THE STATE: ( ) YES ( X) NO IS SYSTEM DESIGNED FOR LESS THAN 2,000 GALLONS PER DAY: ( ) YES ( X) NO WATER CONSERVATION PLAN: 1.6 gallon flush toliej X) YES ( ) NO NOTE: The Environmental Health Office may reduce the required absorption area upon approval of an adequate water conservation plan. SOURCE AND TYPE OF WATER SUPPLY: (x ) Well ( ) Spring ( ) Creek/Stream Give d f all wells wi hin 200 feet of system: to be drilled Ifs pl' by it ater ive name of supplier: SIGNATURE �� _ DATE: —2 0--�'I INFORMATION BELOW TO BE FILLED OUT BY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH OFFICER: GROUND CONDITIONS: Percent ground slope Depth to Bedrock (Per 8' profile hole Depth to Groundwater table SOIL. PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS: _ Minutes per inch in Hole #1 Minutes per inch in Hole 02 Minutes per inch in Hole #3 FINAL DISPOSAL BY: �Absorption Trench, Bed or Pit Evapotranspiration ( ) Above Ground Dispersal Sand Filter ( ) Under Ground Dispersal ( ) Wastewater Pond ( ) Other AMOUNT PAID: RECEIPT NUMBER DATE: CHECK NUMBER NOTE: SITE PLAN MUST BE ATTACHED TO APPLICATION. MAKE ALL REMITTANCE PAYABLE TO: "EAGLE COUNTY TREASURER". (Environmental Health Dept. - Rev. 4/88) 1 � ` rIl COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Water Quality Control Division 4210 East llth Avenue Denver, Colorado 80220 APPLICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL FOR CONSTRUCTION OR EXPANSION OF: A) DOMESTIC WASTEWATER TREATMENT WORKS (INCLUDING TREATMENT PLANTS, OUTFALL SEWERS, AND LIFT STATIONS) OVER 2.,,000 GPD CAPACITY. B) INTERCEPTORS (IF REQUIRED BY C.R.S. 25-8-702 (3)) APPLICANT: VAIL ASSOCIATES. INC. c/o Brad Foster ADDRESS: P.O. Box 7. Vail. CO A1658 PHONE: 1n-1-476-5601 Consulting Engineer's Name and Address: ALPINE ENGINEERING, INC. c/o Glenn Palmer P.O. Box 97, Edwards, CO 81632 PHONE: j03-926-3173 A. Summary of information regarding new sewage treatment plant: (SEPTIC SYSTEM) 1. Proposed Location: (Legal Description) SOUTH l/2, SE 1A, Section 12 Township 4 SOUTH, Range 81 WEST, EAGLE County. 2. Type and capacity of treatment facility proposed: Processes Used SEPTIC SYSTEM; SEPTIC TANKS AND BURIED LINED SAND _FILTER Hydraulic 6670 Organic is ay lbao B 5 ay Present PE N/A Design PE N/A % Domestic 1L0 i % Industrial 3. Location of facility: Attach a map of'the area which includes the following: (a). 5-mile radius: all sewage treatment plants, lift stations, and.domestic water supply intakes. NONE NONE (b) 1-mile radius: (habitable buildings, location of potable water wells,)and an approximate indication of the topography. 4. Effluent disposal: Surface discharge to watercourse NONE Subsurface disposal see plans_ _ Land Evaporation Other State water quality classification of receiving watercourse(s) N()T APPT.7CART.F Proposed Effluent Limitations developed in conjunction with Planning and Standards Section, WQCD: BODS mg/l SS mg/1 Fecal Coliform /100 ml Total Residual Chlorine mg/1 Ammonia mg/1 Other 5. Will a State or Federal grant be sought to finance any portion -of this project? NO 6. Present zoning of site area? NOT ZONED Zoning with a 1-mile radius of site? U.S. FOREST SERVICE 7. What is the distance downstream from the discharge to the nearest domestic water supply intake? Subsurface discharge, nearest downstre tName or supply) approximately 11 miles downstream (Address of Supply) What is the distance downstream from the discharge to the nearest other point of diversion? Subsurface discharge, nearest downstream occupied ranch is (Name of User) approximately 11 miles downstream (Address -of User -1- WQCD-3 (Revised 8-83) C. If the facility will be located on or adjacent to a site that is owned or managed by a ,Federal or State agency, send the agency a copy of this application. D. Recommendation of governmental authorities: Please address the following issues in your recommendation decision. Are the proposed facilities consistent with the comprehensive plan and any other plans for the area, including.the 201 Facility Plan or 208 Water Quality Management Plan, as they affect water quality? If you have any further comments or questions, please call 320-8333, Extension 5272. Recommend Recommend No Date roval Disapproval Comm—= Signature of Representative Mr. Frank Marugg (adjacent owner) 2. U.S.F.S (adjacent owner) 3. Boar o unty mm s 4. S� �/ , Loca e t ut or ty y ounty ann ng Authority 6. Council of Governments/RegionalPlanning 7. State Geologist 8. D�nys aoEter Bf.. a&,. (�n qTC, tri)ons for (For lift stations, the signature of the State Geologispp�i treatment plants require all signatures.) I certify that I am familiar with the requirements of the "Regulations for Site Applications For Domestic Wastewater Treatment Works," and have posted the site in accordance with the regulations. An engineering report, as described by the regulations, has been prepared and is enclosed. Brad W. Foster DATE r~' =d J �� l �� p� Glenn Palmer Signature of Applicant TYPED NAME -3- .,WQCD-3 (Revised 8-83) sus Vbl August 5, 1992 Mr. Keith Montag 1-11 Eagle County Environmental Health P. O. Box 179 Eagle CO 81631 RE: Piney Lake Septic System Dear Mr. Montag: ALPINE ENGINEERING INC RECEIVED AUG 7 192 EAGLE COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Please find attached a REQUEST TO AMEND AN APPROVED SITE APPLICATION, for the Piney River Ranch septic system. The septic system is proposed to be reduced in size, per actual water usage metered and recorded at the site. The approved application was based upon estimated use which was overly conservative. The septic system would have been constructed much larger than necessary. It is my understanding per attached application, that you have 15 working days to respond to this letter. You may call either Ray Merry at the Eagle County Health Department (328-8730) or Jim Chubrilo at the Colorado Department of Health (879-7479) with comments, or sign the attached letter and mark the appropriate box for approval or disapproval, and return it to us in the addressed, stamped envelope. If you have any questions, please feel free to call. Sincerely, Glenn Palmer, P.E. Attachments: Request to Amend an Approved Site Application Response letter and return envelope cc: Jack Hunn Jim Chubrillo Edwards Business Center • P.O. Box 97 • Edwards, Colorado 81632 • 303/926-3373 • FAX 303/926-3390 August 6, 1992 Mr. Glenn Palmer Alpine Engineering, Inc. P. 0. Box 97 Edwards CO 81632 Dear Mr. Palmer: v RE: PINEY RIVER RANCH SEPTIC SYSTEM The requested amendment to the approved site application is: \i Acceptable * Unacceptable (If unacceptable, please state reason.) *With the following conditions: Piney River Ranch must continue to accurately monitor water usage. ALPINE ENGINEERING INC August 5, 1992 Mr. Ray Merry ✓ Eagle County Environmental Health P. O. Box 179 Eagle CO 81631 RE: Piney Lake Septic System Dear Mr. Merry: RECEIVED AU G 7 1992 EAGLE COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Please find attached a REQUEST TO AMEND AN APPROVED SITE APPLICATION, for the Piney River Ranch septic system. The septic system is proposed to be reduced in size, per actual water usage metered and recorded at the site. The approved application was based upon estimated use which was overly conservative. The septic system would have been constructed much larger than necessary. It is my understanding per attached application, that you have 15 working days to respond to this letter. You may call either Ray Merry at the Eagle County Health Department (328-8730) or Jim Chubrilo at the Colorado Department of Health (879-7479) with comments, or sign the attached letter and mark the appropriate box for approval or disapproval, and return it to us in the addressed, stamped envelope. If you have any questions, please feel free to call. Sincerely, Glenn Palmer, P.E. Attachments: Request to Amend an Approved Site Application Response letter and return envelope cc: Jack Hunn Jim Chubrillo W-5 -0 /OS9 Edwards Business Center • P.O. Box 97 • Edwards, Colorado 81632 - 303/926-3373 - FAX 303/926-3390 RECEIVED August 6, 1992 Mr. Glenn Palmer Alpine Engineering, Inc. P. O. Box 97 Edwards CO 81632 RE: PINEY RIVER RANCH SEPTIC SYSTEM Dear Mr. Palmer: A!I0 7 1"2 EAGLE COUNTY Whugay DEVELOPMF The requested amendment to the approved site application is: I Acceptable * NO I E Rf� �1a vA Is . A 4 M'/ /�P /�-, �/ Unacceptable o� n p s r e 2 f i w i �� �o o�� ( c` /p"- .r`,(� (If unacceptable, please state reason.) S/ rc�a��, u�p�-oorrat rtio�%�� caTi i «� 11 by titl �ttf�. n MEMORANDUM To: Keith Montag From: Roger Boyd Date: August 7, 1992 Re: Amending Piney River Ranch site application Piney River Ranch has proposed a reduction in the size on their septic system based on actual water usage. By using a metering device, VA has determined that actual water usage was considerable less than originally estimated. In order to make this change, VA must amend the State site application. I have discussed this issue in detail with Glenn Palmer and recommend we approve the request to amend the site application. However, the following condition should be place on our approval: Piney River Ranch must continue to accurately monitor water usage. kLPINE COMMUNICATION RECORD �GwE�RWG �lhtC IROJECT: P/HEY CAee SEwE72. SYSTEM Joe NQ. 'ERSON CONSULrEQ: leoGE- go1/p- FIRMr-Y TELEPHONE NO. ,DQRESS: 'ORPQSE OF CONTACT: I�lSELi SE7°T/G TA1�1/G -- OATE: q Ilq�gl 'Y: 6LENQ PALME'9- . COPIES TO.-JINUGRy1JtJ 11-FfkNNlS SPAEht DPcI�.I LlS'tbl� ❑MEMORANQUM %3TELEPHONE CONFERENCE ONEETING HINUTES OTRANSHITTAL ssaC3aaaaaaaaLaLOaWaaa;Ass saaaaDaasaaaasaasaaaasasasaaass: 137RANSMITTEDsHEAErITH=ssaaaaaaa3anaa k Edwards Business Center a P.O. Box 97 e Edwards. Colorado 81632 • 303/949-4640 •3031926-3373 ALPINE ENGINEERING,` INC. Edwards Business Center -'PO.-'Box 97 -I EdwardsColorado 81632 (970) 926-3373`• Fax-(970) 926-3390 ISDS Permit # Building Permit # APPLICATION FOR INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PERMIT ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH OFFICE - EAGLE COUNTY P.O. BOX 179 EAGLE, CO 81631 328-8755/927-3823 (Basalt) PERMIT APPLICATION FEE $150.00 PERCOLATION TEST FEE $200.00 PROPERTY OWNER: Vail Associates, Inc. MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 7, Vail, CO 81658 PHONE: 479-3143 APPLICANT/CONTACT PERSON:- Linn Schorr, Alpine Engineering, Inc. PHONE: (970) 926-3373 Dave Thorpe, Vail Assoc., Inc. (970) 479-3143 LICENSED SYSTEMS CONTRACTOR: NA ADDRESS: PHONE: ************************************************************************************ PERMIT APPLICATION IS FOR: O NEW CONSTRUCTION O ALTERATION (X) REPAIR LOCATION OF PROPOSED INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM: Legal Description:_ S 1/2, SE 1/4, Sectionl2, T4S, R81W Parcel Number: Lot size: Physical Address: Piney River Ranch, 6 Mi. North of Vail BUILDING TYPE: (Check applicable category) () Residential/Single Family () Residential/Multi-Family* (X) Commercial/Industrial* Number of Bedrooms Number of Bedrooms Type Restaurant and Recreation TYPE OF WATER SUPPLY: Well (X) Spring ( ) Surface ( ) Public ( ) Name of Supplier: *These systems require design by a Registered Professional Engineer NOTE: SITE PLAN MUST BE ATTACHED TO APPLICATION MAKE ALL REMITTANCE PAYABLE TO: "EAGLE COUNTY TREASURER" SIGNATURE: AMOUNT PAID: RECEIPT # CHECK # DATE: DATE: CASHIER: ' GEORGE SHAEFFER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY P.O. Box 373 Vail, Colorado 81658 (303)845-5656 DATE: TIME: LOCATION: ATTENDEES: PINEY RIVER RANCH MEETING MINUTES - EAGLE COUNTY BUILDING DEPT. April 30, 1991 3:00 P.M. Eagle County Building Dept. Eagle County Building Dept.: Andy Montoya - Chief Inspector Paul Clarkson - Planning and Zoning Roger Hosea - Environmental Health George Shaeffer Construction Co.: Tim Lowery The purpose of the meeting was to review the preliminary project plans and to discuss concerns related to the County. The following items were discussed: 1. Regarding the potential bridge replacement, the County recommended that the Army Corps of Engineering (Grand Junction, CO) be notified. A "404 Nationwide Permit" would be granted for the work. The bridge, apparently, is not in the County's jurisdiction as County route 6A is only maintained 1.47 miles from Highway 131. 2. A set of formalized drawings as well as a "parcel map" drawing would be needed when submitting for permit. The permit approval time is presently taking 15 working days except for special use permits (discussed below) which require 6-7 weeks. The County recommends that separate permit applications be made as follows: A. Main House B. Cottages C. Foreman's Residence 3. An initial interpretation concern was discussed relative to the land use and zoning. Zone district regulations (Section 2.06 - pages 26-29) were discussed relative to the location and use of the four dwellings. The designation of "Guest Cottage" was noted by the County as not being allowed per zoning rules. Instead, it was noted that "recreational facility" (2.06.01 3H.17) was more appropriate. This, however, would need to be applied for a "special use" permit as noted above. This is a long lead concern that needs to be addressed. Eagle Cty. Bldg. Dept. April 30, 1991 Page Two 4. Another concern was pointed out regarding the location of the Foreman's residence (Rocky's House). If this is located on the same "plot" of land (i.e.. Rickstrew's) this could be considered a problem. Tim stated that he thought this was not the case. The County would like to see some documentation to clarify this (i.e.. legal descriptions). Tim said he would get this information. 5. Regarding this "special use" permit; Tim was given sections 2.09.02 through 2.09.06 from the county regulations. These will be sent to Inara and Bill Post to review. 6. The definition of "caretaker" was discussed. Tim felt this was not applicable to relate to the Foreman's residence. 7. Regarding environmental health, the issue of the septic. systems were discussed. County requirements state that septic leach fields need to be located at least 50' from the river and 100' from the well. Water service lines need to be located at least 25' from leach fields and 10" from the septic tanks. A review of the plot plans seems to indicate that there will be no problems with these locations 8. The County appreciated the fact that these preliminary drawings were being reviewed with them and indicated their willingness to work with us on this project. The above is my understanding of the items discussed. If there are any clarifications or corrections, please contact the writer at the j~ a ve umber. 1 Tim Lowery Project Manager TL/rm CC: Attendees George Shaeffer, Rick Winkeller - GSCC Nick Everett - Lexington Development, Inc. Bill Post - Otto, Porterfield & Post Inara Kundzins - Arthur Erickson Architects Page 1 of 1 Terri Vroman From: Clearwater Cleanup [clearwatercleanup@hotmail.com] Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2010 8:18 AM To: #environment Subject: Piney River Ranch Attachments: 0630101125.jpg Terri, This is a picture of over flow of septic tank at piney river ranch. We pumped this down about 2400 gallons but depending on inflow they may over flow again any time. I have a quote in to them to pump the whole tank and install a loaner pump if they want. It takes all day and 4 trucks + an AVC 8000-gallon processing tank, to pump the whole septic tank and lift station to empty. This would give us time to figure out problem with pumps or if it is the drain field (that wont accept any more water) and handle the inflow for a couple of days at least. I might be taking too long of a view here. I tried. to convey that as long as waste water needs to be hauled off it should just as well be the heavy sludge that leaves. The first two or three truck loads are pretty much just water and then the next trucks are picking up all the sludge and washing out the tank. If there is a problem with the field it wont be taken care of quickly and the septic tanks will have to be pumped as a holding tank. If there is just a problem with the pumps then it may take a couple of days (maybe more due to holiday) to get the right new pumps in and installed. We quoted specific pumps for several times but our work was not accepted due I assume to the expense. Thanks Doug 7/2/2010 1059-91 - Piney River Ranch,l!Vail Associates gq,s q0 c)���' JOB NO, Call JOB LOCATION BILL TO DATE STARTED DATE COMPLETED DATE BILLED 4y V .5 S f ago° 7_ JOB COST SUMMARY TOTAL SELLING PRICE /�•��";� -, , ,� �� I� �iflC C,�, TOTAL MATERIAL TOTAL LABOR INSURANCE SALES TAX MISC. COSTS TOTAL JOB COST GROSS PROFIT LESS OVERHEAD COSTS % OF SELLING PRICE NET PROFIT JOB FOLDER Product 277 ®q NEW ENGLAND BUSINESS SERVICE, INC., GROTON, MASS. 01471 JOB FOLDER Printed in U.S.A. � � 6 e L � r "- 3 � 3 v 14 j ,m <_ _ - - - - - - _ . - % = . - _ . -i . . - - - - -- _ -- -- -•- - - - - s - . -- - . A. --"-F&LL-iCG1Plr Vn�.1 _ - - _ - - _ - - = - r_ _ __ _ - - - _- - „ 1 LQAU TISEQ_i TIE GN - - - - - - LSYE -- ___ � i �_ _- - - - - _ - -- - 3 - 5 MIN.) _ IES STIRRUPS'=: _ - _ PLAT W j " - _ ( CONFORMING 20 ASTM A615 GRADE 50 EXCEPT T , 1. ATTA..H ROOF DECK TO PLA S ITH.(3)•-5/8 PUDDLES- - - - .. . - . - ( „ 5O6 O.C. _ v - - - _ A• - _ . - - _.- _ _ - - ` . - 100 ,PSF ROOF _ • . = - AND PLATE ANCHORS WHIC H SHALL:BE DEFORMED BARS ASTM--`_ _ _ -- - -- WELDS AT EACH_PLATE. = - - -.- �' - - - ,_ - _ _. _ . _ 7 __ - . _ __ - _ 5 GRADE 4 0 . DESIGNATION A6 1 . _ - - - - - -_ � _ - - _� . - _ . : - :.. _ _ :- - _ - _ — — — III lil— -- k - - - = - - _ - - EARTHQUAKE = -- ZONE I ' 3 -- - - -_ -- - z - _ _ _ - - 2. LONGITUDINAL JOINTS -BETWEEN ADJACENT _DECK=_UNITS.. - - _ - . - -. ._ - 1 IIII _ __ ,B - . - _ - _- - _ _.: - - = - - - - - - B. - REINFORCEMENT PROTECTION: - - - _ - - - _ HALL -=BE =FASTENED `TOGETHER WITH 5 _6"--DIAMETER ::, _ - S - f - -. -- _- - _ - - - SCR__ AT,24 WITH PUDDLE'WELDS O.C.. ` - - - - - : _- - = —III- F.E.— FOtTr1mATIONS . - _ _ - - - 1. -_ CONCRETE AGAINST EARTH'-.-.. 3 - - _ = = � - _ - - - �-- -- _... - - - _, _ - - . - —. — _, -- — — — — — — — —..- — T ---... — — -A. -_- - _ - THE ALLOWABLE SOIL BEARING PRESS URE ASSUMED IN DESIGN .POURED = - . - - -. - - _ - - - _ - - - -MAN N CONCRETE_FORM - - 3 . ATTACH DECK (PE E T Y TO -f - i L:_ -_ __ ._ _` 23/4 C LR. • _ = IS 2000 PSF. THE CONTRACT OR SHALL-RETAIN=A LICENSED - D WEATHER OR " 2. CONCRETE POURED -IN FORMS; (EXPOSE TO - _ - - - -' _ EACH INTERMEDIATE = SUPPORT_ AT `SIDE " LAPS - WITH PUDDLE -- f__- =_ _ - _ _ -. SOILS ENGINEER TO INSPECT THE FOUNDATION .EXCAVATION.. -- - - - - _ - 2- EARTH -- WELD. EACH END LAP="IS=WELDED-_.TQ EACH SIDE�LAP _-' - - - . _ - . - . O-# 4 CON_. - • - . I . - ` . - SOILS ENGINEER SHALL=VERIFY IN WRITING THE ACTUAL SOILS _ - - - - -_ PLUS- NE INTERMEDIATE WELD THREE .WELDS PER PUSO I { - - - -.. - . _ =_ _ E_ - -- . ._ -/ - - - f - _ 5 0 12" O.C. / - - _ - - - - - - - _ - -• - - -r _ _ = HAN ASSUMED. - - - CAPACITY IS ,EQUAL TO OR.GREATER T - - _ -- - -. - - _- _ __ .- - - - - - - -- - - - - _ - - n _ - • _ _ . _ 1-1/2 _ 3. - COLUMNS - AND BEAMS _ (TIE BARS) . - - - . - - - - _ - - - - - _- -- -. - _- - - - - - - -- - - -- -- - - - __ _ __ -- _ - - SHEET - - - � - - - _ - - - -.- -- - - _ - _ - - - - --- - - - - - - - -- i - _ - _ _ - -- _ A I - - - _ -` 4 .: i= - _ --- .. » WEATHER 3/ _ - - a _- = EXPOSED TO ) X 8 EM8E0 D . - 4 . SLABS AND _WALLS (NOT 6. SiFNF.R AT. • - ;," . r 1/4 X 4 CAULK JOINT EAR NG .ELEVATIONS SHOWN ARE ASSUME - _ _ , - _ „ - • - - B. ALL FOOTING .BEARING. - _ - ' . ,-� ._ - - - ..:, . _ � - _ = - E W ?-1 2 �X 6 -PLAT / / � ,� � ( --- H.A.S. O 3 -0 0. C� € _ - � - _ - � AT NS SHALL BE VERIFIED IN .-THE FIELD EXACT BEARING ELEV IO WITH APPRO VAL dI C ,. _.. - = - _ - - - - _ - NO SPLICES OF.REZNFORCEMENT SHALL 8E MADE;EXCEPT_AS - -. A. a, _ -- - --_ _ _ - - . -ENGINEER'S ACCEPTANCE MUST BE SECURED _FOR ALL'STRUCTUR - . -- N . 2 20 GAGE METAL - _=__ WITH -ACTUAL CONDITIONS HY CONTRACTOR .-- _ _ >- - =- - - - . r �_ . . i > ._: .. �• �� 2 2 _ » 4 O 12 EACH WAY DECK „ —O - : _ - - .._ � . } - - - - - - - _ - - = _ -- - - -- - - _ SOILS ENGINEER. _ - _ _ _ . _ _ - - - - _ _ : - . _ -- - -- _- - _ - - - - --= - - DETAILEII OR AUTHORIZED BY_ THE STRUCTURAL -ENGINEER: LAP MINIMUM OF 36 BAR ED " SHALL. BEAM SPLICES, WHERE PERMITT , - -_ __ - , r- = - IT T NS` = AL -SUBST U IO r - - - - -_ - _ -j - . . - f - - - 4' . € _-ENTERED "� "1 "l • #4 O 16 O. C> X - _ C. __ - FIRM, -UNDISTURBED,, ALL FOOTINGS ARE,- TO BE PLACED -ON ON FI , , _ _ _ DIAMETERS. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. MAKE _ALL ,BARS : _ - - - Y _ B. " _ - - VERIFY ALL OPENINGS :THROUGH FLOORSE ,tdOF AND WALLS WITH_ - _ -." __ ! m - -I - - - 2'-O„ _ . _ NATURAL SOIL PROPERLY -COMPACTED BACKFILL,`APPROVE� -CONTINUOUS AROUND CORNERS. - - - L EL TRICAI. _CONTRACTORS. = VERZFZGATION OFf MECHANICA AND EC - __: - _ - . - . a - I _ - [_ t - -OR • B THE SOILS -ENGINEER.= BACKFILL SHALL BE COMPACTED :0 Y - - -- - -- - _ - - - -.LOCATIONS SIZES LINTELS, -AND REQUIRED:_ CONNECTIONS ARE' . . -- 3 _ -- _ . € i. - }. 95�_ (MINIMUM) STAN DARD PROCTOR DENSITY; UNLESS OTHERWISE D. , p - PROJECTION - PLACE TWO #4 (PER 8_ THICKNESS) WITH 2. 0 - -_:°C -_ - NTRAC OR_S COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY. � - -,tf - G T - ; - - _ • i - > _- _ ,, . s � -,� - S PORT' IF -SOFT SPOTS AREA-: RECOMMENDED THE .SOIL RE - - - = _ AROUND ALL OPENINGS IN CONCRETE WALLS, `AND FLOOR SLAB._ - - - --PROVIDE .. - - - . 8 s —o . _ - I -ZN ENCOUNTERED REMOVE RECOMPACT WITH .APPROVED ; _ ._ A EACH CORNER. _ ALSO _PROVIDE TWO #4 X =4 0: DIAGONALLY T_ C. - ALL EMBEDDED ITEMS SIN STRUCTURE°AS.NOTED-OAI.• - _ -_ _ - - - ., - _ - _ _ - -SOIL.."AND - _ DESCRIPTION -OF BEARING?LACE$ RE: - MECHANICAL. °ELECTRICAL, 'AND =STRUCTURAL- =G - � - - - :,:-; _ - _ _ - -- - - _ - - - -- - - - - SOIL-) _ -- - - _ - MANHOLE . _ = DED `_ TEM ANC OR - DRAWINGS' MISCELLANEOUS -EMBED I S �iND H - - _ _ != . f - _ - . _ - _ _ -_ ' = - - BOLTS SHALL -BE FURNISHER BY STEEL _SUPPLIER -AND " : = _ - ; . r. - F „ 3 —0 „ # 4 O 12 O.C. X - = _ - - ; -. s D. _ _ DO NOT PLACE_BACKFILL AGAINST=BASEMENT WALLS -UNTIL _ - E. - CONTINUOUS. TOP AND BOTTOM BAR S IN WALLS - AND BEAMS . SHALL - _ - _ _ - _ = ZNSTALLEI?_ BY CONCRETE - CONTRACTOR: ' ., STEEL SHALL' FULFILL _"_ - _ - _ _ - - - _ . . t _ �._- - -: •: - _ • .. - _ - - � . - _ - -FLOOR AND ROOF ARE. IN PLACE. _ - - F __ - - - - BE SPLICED AS FOLLOWS: TOP BARS AT MIDSPAN, BOTTOM; _ _ _ - - - . - - _ - __ _ _ _ - - .-_ - _ - =-ASTM A36.- _ __ - . ; - - = - - - _:_ .,_- _ - - € 5 „ . --- - - _ - - --- . -- _ _ _ - - SUPPORTS*- - - - - - - BARS OVER SUP T = - - = - - - ._ _.. . _ - . ,- _. - - - _ _ - - - - - _ - _- , = - , _, - . - _ : - CONCRETE CO.. ,. - _ . # _ . - - - - - - - - -- - - - -- � - — - - - T D. -- - ,SUBMIT-SHOP-ANO.ERECTION DRAWINGS`T0-ENGINEER-FOR _ 'REVIEW - - -, _ _. _ : , . . - F - i • .. ... .. - - - _ -. "_ - - _ _`.- - - F. PROVIDE ALL,ACCESSORIES NECESSARY TO SUPPORT REINFORC- - OF_ALL REINgORCI NG:- THE MANUFACTURING -0R" FABRZ- _ - :: ,__ - __ -- - . = ,_ :_ _ - :. _ „ 7 M►N. WATERSTOP ( ) .. CENTERED ROUGHEN SLAB SURFACE _ UNDER WALL -- -. - ;_ - . - __ A. --- _ _ - _ - _ - - - NCRETE SHALL 8E MADE WITH --TYPE _ . ALL IN PLACE C0 - ZNG AT. POSITIONS'SHOWN ON THE PLANS ALL REINFORCEMENT= - _ F TE - PRIOR- TO -WRITTEN -REVIEW -:� OF -- SHOP CATION- C ANY I MS - _ rt - - - - . - _ . - '• ' _ -- -- _CAST - = II PORTLAND CEMENT .STONE AGGREGATE AND SHALL ' RELY=IN PROPER POSITION IN ACCORDANCE TO BE HELD SECU - - _- _ DRAWINGS --WILL BE ENTIRELY.AT-THE RISK OF -THE'- ONTRAC:_. - - _- - -- ._ -- - - - - CAULK JOINT l - _ = - DEVELOP_ .4000. PSI -COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH IN 28 DAYS. - - - - - -_ _ . _ 1318 7 7 . - WITH AC - --_ _ - _ '"- _ . _ TOR. - _ - - . - - - _ .- .- - , - _ - . - . _ --_. .. _ .. -. _-- _ - OUTSIDE 1 DE OU DE AND .- N 4 O 12 EACH . _ k �_ - -. - _ _ , - - _ - - . - - - . - . '� . - - -- - - - - _ _ - - - - - - - _ - - _- _ _- -=_ _ _ _. _ — - - - -- _ -- - - -_: _ . _ _ :- -_ _ .>. - - - AY - r-_ =- - r== B. _ _ D -._THE MODULES OF_ -ELASTICITY OF ALL.CONCRETE, SHALL EXCEs METAL 5. T � . - _ _ . L. DECK --__ - -, - _ - ` E. 4" WA TC� SHALL s WATERPROGFING, _VAPOR BARRIERS,_ TERSTOPe�.E r - _ _ .- -. -- �: _ • - ., _ , i. - s - E We t--133 fc OR 57 000 f c NO-MAL-WEIGHT CONCRET ). i r = - ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS AND =AS `_INDI _` BE ' AS -SHOWN ON THE _ AR -_ :- - - III - _ , _ a - --- _ _ , <- -_ _ : - - _ - - Y- : A. DECK SHALL BE GALVANIZED ST EEL, SHALL B E OF THE -TYPE - � _ 3_ . GATED IN THE SPECIFICATIONS . - - __ - •'" - -- k �.= _ _ _ . _ _ __- _ 4 C� _, _ - =SLABS,='TOPF�NG,_FOOTINGS,. BEAMS; AND WALLS SHALL NOT-- �- - - - - -_ LED, FOR ON THE`FRAMING PLANS AND SHALL BE CONTINU CAL _ - - _ _ �_' -_ -_ _ _ -_._.F__ __ = - - - _- � E .. - iE�u - = _ - IN S--= N =A HORIZONTAL PLANE. ANY_ -STOP IN CON- HAVE JO T I - _ - - - QUS. - - - - � F- - ALL DIMENSIONS ON,_STRUCTURAL DRA INGS SHALL 'BE _CHECKED_ - = - _ - . - - - . - � - _ • o • -.. _ - = - _ - -OF--SPAN WITH W Rid: MU BE .MADE AT THIRD .POI T _ CRETE 0 S2 -- : - - = _ - - - - - - F - = W _ - TURAL D INGS. FIELD ARCH TEC RA AGAINST IN - _ - - - _ - - -_ _ - __ - . _ _ - _. ._- <- - _= ao,.• - _.. : . . -VERTICAL BULYh.EADS_AND_HORIZONTAL.SHEAR KEYS UNLESS= _r=B.__.DECKING SHALL BE -INSTALLED AND ALL OPENINGS I N DECK CUT - _ _ - _ _ - _E - -- _ - - _ =III •p :. - 3 ..4 o�l7t� . .,.. r _ ' __ -_-- - _ - H N TRUCTION JOINTS SHALL BE R, OTHERWISE S Obi. ALL CO. S - , _ AND REINFORCED IN `ACCORDANCE WITH MANUF ACTURER S - - . . . - - - - _ - _: - _ • __1 • _ = __ - ., • - III II I III I III E . _ - - _ - ` - =_ - _' R AS VIEWED BY THE ENGINEER. _ - DETAILED 0 RE _ - EX EPT AS OTHERWISE -STAN DARD DETAILS AND SPECIFICA TIONS C - - .- _ _- _ . - --_ - _ - - �_ , _ ,.. _ - - = - _- - _ - _ - �R SPECIFIED. MANHOLE OPENINGS `IN ROOF `SLABS - I I - - - a . - - - - I . - 6 - - _F r=i - � - � -1 � _ - - SLAB HAS REACHED DESIGN STRENGTH - - _ - (2)--#4 CON ' E WO _ _ I. -Olt D _ ALL CONCRET - _ RE- AND _REINFORCEMENT DETAILING - SHALL BE _ _ Z.SHALL BE CUT AFTER - - - - - I - - € - - - - _ -- _ _ ,. - : - - - - -- - - - - =_ - 1 __ _ = - _ - - - _ _ - - - - - - - - - - __ - __ - _- - _ _ - - - - - - _ - - - - - - __ j = - _ - - - _ - _ .- - - - _ _. . __- - - - _ _ _. _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - - - - - - -__ - v _ _- - - - - - _ • _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - _ - _ __ - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ r _ __ - - _ _ _ _ __ - _ _ _ _ - - - - - - - _ _ _ _ _ ... - _ - _ _ - _ _ ... - -- - - _ - - - - _ _ 4 - - - -. _ _ - - _ - - - - - - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - - . . - - -\F _ _ _-- _ _ _ _ _ -> _ - _ - .r - r- - - _ _- - - - - - - _- _ _ i - - - - - - - _ - _ _ _ -. _ _ _ _ _. - _ - -- _ _ _ --_- _ - - _ _ _ - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ._ __ _ _ _ _ - - - - _ - - _ -._ _ - - - - _ _ r _ -___ _ - . _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ - _ _ - _ _ _ _- - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - - - - - - - -- - - - - _ -'i -_ - _ - s _ - _ - - - _ - - _ - _ - _ _ _ - E -- - t '- - _ - _ _ _ _T. - s ` . c i It _ _ _ Y - - _ _ -_. __. . _ --_- .. _ - - _-. .- -. __. - _. �- __ _ _ - _ � ._ __- - . .... -_ - -- - -----__ _ " - __ __ -� - . .-._.. _- - - - �.._.. _. _ . -. _ - - - - -__ - -. - _ _ ._ - _ � ( _ _ _ _ __ _ . _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ tom. _ _ _ _ - _ - - __ - - - - __ - - -_. �- sew - ._ _� s _ __ _ _ _ — _ . - � _ _ _ _ _ - "_ - -: - as �_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _- a3- _ _ _ _ .� - - - - - - - - - :. - - - - - - - - _ - - - - - - _ _ - - _ - "_ - _ - - - _ _ - _ __ " _ - _ _ - _ _ - I t f SCALE 1" = 20' S). O ``92�i�0 PINEY LAKE WASTEWATER DISPOSAL SYSTEM SITE PLAN h0TE: PROV{DE PUMP HOOK-UP AT LOCATION PER VAIL ASSOCIATES. (REMOTE MANUAL FILL) MARK END OF PHASE 1 FORCE MAIN WITH 4X4 2" SCHEDULE 40 PVC FORCE MAIN SOIL TEST PROPOS 1 PIT #1 DRIVE PHASE 2 EXIST 70 ADDITIONAL DRIVE SEPTIC PH TRENCHES-., AS � � E 94 _ T=- `-xr s r I .� , .•' •'•. SEE SHEET 2 0" •�,� / ,4;•.�• PROPOSED GAS LINE PIPE PER ✓� �� / 1 l �.••� j �•,• / FERRIC GAS REQUIREMENTSf �• .93.5 4i•.�•, 0.5' DEEP)Ile 4111101 'AS -BUILT 10-25-92 ( 1 i GRADING 8 DRAINAGE PLAN. I" = 20' t 9. Provide minimum 3.T depth of cover on sewer line. 10. 11. Remove all horse mature and organic material from the old corral location, prior to any gradirg for the lined sand filter. 12. Hater level is dows�l.4' from natural ground at soil test pit #I. Water level is 3.0' down at soil test pit 02. 13. The concrete slab adjacent to the boiler is used as the benchmark. Assumed elevation 100'. 14. The north reference is approximate. A4rE of suKuEY MAY 29 I99/. 15. FKOJIvE l CA_E �� FEE rvtA;N I 16. PROVIDE THRUST BLOC4 ON ALL FORCE MAIN BENDS. JCEUISEV JvNE 81 l99/ IPEf F/ECD 501eue - , i I f I i k i k k f RECEIVED AU 7 1992 EAGLCOMM N TY DEVELOP MENT F i 1 LEGEND { 98.6 . SPOT ELEV_ I TREE LINE • CLEANOUT SEWER LINE (SOLID 4- PVC) MA4TER LI g (POLYDUTYLENE) e- SCFZD. 40 PVC — —9B— EXIST CONTOUR 98— PROPOSED CONTOUR — — — — EDGE OF LAKE — — —� — — DRAINAGE DIRECTION 0 DISTRIBUTION BOX THRUST BLOCK EXIST TREE INLET C REVISED 10 /2 /91 I 4001 9383e2E ilk i/ ool rl 400 CII PARK 4500 375 --- g40C . _ ��-� - _ - • �� _ • /,- _ 68.253 ACRES IJ 1�- r 3n . •� • 1 i 335 0 L '-T�_'. • 1 �a�, crn j 0 4 NORTH • _ I . -- g/0 , = ' -c E - t 0 _ ALE ' - ` •A� `.dos • - r 1 j - ` L. _ 200' IV 013 93, 38 if 05 ECTION �p "' 2758• 48 � t 51.9 T 1 _ Fti)'r - - { %A/ =—W' PINEY LAKE j—�\ `\ ♦ .. _ DIY- tl , �_`_ - UP -as •�'� — — i N OVERALL SITE hLA LEGEND #1 Corral ` i # 2 Septic Tanks ......... � #3 Leach Field # 4r � � � %� ` �✓ ��-�h ; , #4 Restroom Facility O, ::� r` c -7�� t • #5 Employee Compound 1 5� -�_% - � #6 Exist Caretaker Unit i,{: / �'L '" �; . - �;-✓� : 1 �- #7 Dining #2 - z ✓,' - ------E„yt. 9 Dining i�ir`��" ` f� �R?�\�; #8 Dock ` r- , I _� ` ##1 -Gn, — y—' ! . - iJ �� �, g - KNOCK HOLE IN #10 Kitchen/Retail SIDEWALL AND " -'^r' 1 •',, zs \ ~ \ #11 Proposed Well Site ALTERNATE PUMPS. SITE' C ►°'�`lJ - ►.5. \ # 12 e '�. - T NOT CONSTRUCTED '' 7/24/92 ? # 13 Leach Field #3 7 /24/92 = � • ` �� i� Cam Y, f\ ; `� - `\' _-- �AMHv !g> •s -a . dal a-<at!-•J v 1 -�t' \_ - _ _ - l-r.-���'�I -J1 _ I cstas _ l / PROFILE - DOSING CHAMBER w, sT-WUCTUPAr_ puiy� FOV- eEv - C- i %• cE • to F DINtFrjSicN-5 ns st: /1 _ �_ , y'_ _ _ _ - / v - - I d� - : _ p - , .6n•,r _ _ - _ -> •/` i _ 8 14•-8- 1` i d Y, • avy f w x/1057 I / [:j Eli •a aw . NOTE LIDNC. SI ALL BE 4000 PSI - ASTM C— 478 USE 700 GALLON OR MORE CAPACITY •.INVz NZ e �'- - 1 7- _ - r ( ellSCALE •� / I/ r•4000•. 65 _ ,90 - - -- - •� _s ! Nail -:::.�- - - _ - ,-_ _,-- tl I we -At s,'`• -'' E'` --=F S, wIm� �i ! T r-� PLAN / TOP VIEW INVZ.90 INV.1.0' INVzIr DP /PVC 4- 6*_r 5' DEPTH BOTTOM INSIDE TANK EFFLUENT ;� v ELEV:94.75 2(4-) PIPES ire F VICINITY; MAP SEFrrZ —FANK SEWAGE PUMP OPTION REVISED 8/1/91 - 2 SEWAGE PUMPS Rated Capacity L W A 1 B C D E 300 Galloru 72" 48' 48* 24* 214 T 700 Gallons 96• 48' 64' 32' 38' 25' 13- 1000 Gallons t08. 72" T2' 36* 30" 2w 10' 1500 Gaibns 120' 72' 80' 40" 40• 2T' 13- COMMERCIAL SAND AND OIL TRAP NO SCALE DOSING TANK SEWAGE F. C-2* PUMPS me L ABSORPTION TRENCHES 0 . 6670 GPD VERIFY THAT PUMP WILL FIT IN 1'-9" SPACE PRIOR TO CONST. (CONNECT PERF• PIPE TO TOP & SOLID PIPE. 300 GROUP VISITORS 6 1 MEAL/DAY 150 DAY VISITORS ■ 1/2 MEAL/DAY W 3 COMPARTMENT 3W FFROMKITCHEN (a W.C. (SUBSURFACE DISCHIARI _ ABSORPTION TRENCHES TO BE SEPARATED BY THE SUM OF ADJACENT MIN. HORZ. DISTANCES f i BACK FILL W/ SANDY FREE DRAINING MATERIAL i 4" ADS WRAPPED IN MIRAFI 140N (PERFORATED) ® SOLID, RIGID 4" PVC SECTION THRU SURFACE & SUBDRAIN PIPE SECTION PLAN DOSING CHAMBER l i ADD / r4EAkH, FoeA 7z>7, G� ` GRADE LEACH FIELD TO BE FLAT (2% GRADE) 7X�OJG,NE5I Ftf FLAgJ Lr,J 5HEET IoF4 AND TO DIRECT SURFACE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM THE /Zo�">/ LEACH FIELD 6 3 6 I i EXIST U—ND—_�'— �• PROPOSED GROUNDf i PROVIDE 2.5' MIN. COVER i O O 96.5, INVERT OF 4" PIPE INTO *IIFLLTRiaAT0 - UNIT 71-22 e ri/c`/ir � rill •� - //� //i �� /ill i 96.0 ,ELEV OF BOTTOM OF ' INFILTRATOR UNIT �i'•� INFILTRATOR SYSTEM I (PROVIDE PERF PIPE THRU INFILTRATORS FOR ALTERNATE PUMPS SO THAT ` DOSING, PER MANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDATIONS) EFFLUENT WILL BE DISCHARGED r_g- �C�r r�cro,� -fir) TO TO THE SAME ABSORPTION AREA PEVISED 10-1-91 f 6- EVERY OTHER TIME THE DOSING CHAMBER IS FULL (ALTERNATE TO EACH FIELD). 3 SECTION THROUGH 7/24/92_ ABSORSTION TRENCH ALPIN NOT CONSTRUCTED 1, t_ AS-BUILT� AS—pUILT REVISED 8-9-91 ( 7 /24 / 92 10-25-91 JU>vE S, 199 NOTE. ALL STRUCTURAL DIMENSIONS ARE 10 J REVISED 5-23-91 PER DISCUSSION WITH ED CHURCH TO BE PER STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS. SEPTIC TANK VOLUME ■ 9800 GALLONS. REVISED MAY 20, 1991 DOSING TANK VOLUME s 1000 GALLONS. MAY /S, 199 / E I PINEY RIVER RANCH SEPTIC SYSTEM 2' x 3' PRECAST CONC. DISTRIBUTION BOX 69.0 10 INFILTRATOR UNITS E 6.25' _ 62.5' REVISED 8/17/91 PROVIDE SURFACE INSPECTION D E TION, • -72 _ IN INAGE • — � 2 /. PORTALS LS .�� INV.68 5 MIN. SLOPE k AS -BUILT 7 /24 /92 r; I INV=68 5 —70 sit E AREA #2 I - INV= 6' i;s....:::::::::::.::::::::::::::::•.:.:....:.:........:.:.... . (V__ FE �E _' �.TNoT _I F N, W LL •• INV= 6 E ?E � M ETE LI'-AA 1-1 0 0 P, A rAr)Um D TMAY ALLOW �(��( �( i N� rJV vF�ItTI r.l ft'EI�'_rt T(7 G !':rt� H%lj%E 66� `NE NI3F1 ��-��1>t�l�l'ATIv� LCVt t \ 64 SCALE: 1 = 20 60� EXIST / f \FENCE / ; j I / 5$ 56 NOT CONSTRUCTly ED _ / / — ` 2" SCHED 40 PVC FROM SEPTIC TANK �— —!�� -- - �� / / / / (PROVIDE POSITIVE GRADE UP TO AREA #3-.0l 1 f DISTRIBUTION BOX FROM SEPTIC TANK) I 2'x 3' PRECAST BOX _ E INV. = 59.5' / / / / ' ^ 6 [ INV. = 54.5 I � 64 INVERT OF BOX IN AREA #3 TO BE 6" LOWER THAN AREA #2 /Ado INV. = 53.5 INV. _' ' 62 � / I f F l (02 V. = 58.5 58.7 _ %::.. r 60OOO t ..........• • ., 58 / I / f / '00- coo I _ � 5 / j / i / - (DAYLIGHiT / W / / 0000 / - x / / / /! � / ZI / /I Ile PROVIDE 2°/. / / MINIMUM SLOPE w� / I X 3' 6• 3 EXIST FENCE • ! / v OPTIONAL GRADING IF x ~ X X k j r/ RE -SEED WITH GRASS E �� REQUESTED BY VAIL ASSOC. L (IF FILL MATERIAL IS AVAILABLE) f -- EXISTING GROUND PROVIDE CONTINUOUS PERFORATED PIPE ENTRY GATE — i / ` .f WITH PERFORATIONS POINTED UP FOR DOSING, PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMENDATIONS k /'- 2 VERN (WAS NOT RECOMMENDED BY k -�jAARK GRADY OF BOWMAN CONST.) EXISTING GROUND 1.5' \ / - INFILTRATOR SYSTEM INVERT NOTED ON PLANS. x —ic i< i< x i< i< x x� / k \ SD k SECTION THRU ABSORPTION TRENCH #2 I GENERAL NOTES X /j ! / 1. Provide 6' minimum cover on force main. w 2. Provide 3.5' minimum cover on gravity se,er. i / 3. Soil profile holes are to be observed 1-t the spring of 1992 when the w I , groundwater elevation is highest. IL X I / g f �� F i I t x � � ' ALPINE{ ' SHEET k ENGINEERING INC � 3 OF 4 k EDWARDS BUSINESS CENTER • P.O. BOX 97 I I EDWARDS, COLORADO 81632 f 9 303 926-3373 • FAX 926-3390 • I� F PINEY RIVER RANCH OVERALL SITE PLAN NOT CONSTRUCTED I x � i ABSORP ,ON AREA #2 ABSORPTION AREA #3 +-••• - 11\ 11 - i I ::.. � I SCALE: 1 - 50' i SUBSURFACE DRAIN / = / * J \ i I � DAYLIGHTA ELEV_ 52 � — � 60 � �__ FORCE MAIN (6" MIN. COVER) J 00, NORTH ROAD If 50 100, .000 _ `` `� .00 �/ l c0 // �°CS ` GREASE TRAP f \ S ` ' i /� FD ' / /t�HOLDING TANK, SEWAGE PUMP .00 fi � % So `\ � / / _ ('�/ �.�' / /h KITCHEN I f �. ` i � / CORRAL G ry I � f � 1 k _ 1 RES-ROOM' / II I ' 158. t _ EMPLOYEE ABSORPTION ` QUART RS \ ATEA #1 I I _ PR E _ OPERT Y LINE \ AS -BUILT 7-16- 92 - f t _ I 1 _ I � ' I PINEY RIVER {