HomeMy WebLinkAbout2420 Colorow Rd - 210724102004 - 0509ISEAGLE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PLEASE CALL FOR FINAL P. 0. Box 850 - 550 Broadway INSPECTION BEFORE COVERING Eagle, Colorado 81631 ANY PORTION OF INSTALLED SYSTEM 328-7311 or 949-5257 or 927-3823 PERMIT NO. N o 50 9 OWNER: Lis/,'e ADDRESS: SYSTEM LOCATION: . 4,-7 LICENSED INSTALLER: PERMIT MUST BE POSTED AT INSTALLATION SITE **CONDITIONAL INSTALLATION APPROVAL is hereby granted for the following: MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS: / gallon <Etic tank or aerated treatment unit. Absorption area or dispersal area computed as follows: PERCOLATION RATE: / inch in o2 o minutes. Absorption Area per Bedroom ;;?- g ® sq. ft. No. of Bedrooms J x Y0 sq. ft. minimum requirement per bedroom = g 41�O — qO,' 9 total sq. ft. minimum requirement. SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS: t%e e- cl �, / �� ,� — DATE: INSPECTOR: **CONDITIONS: 1. All installation must comply with all requirements of the County Individual Sewage Disposal System Regulations, adopted pursuant to authority granted in 25-10-104, C.R.S. 1973, as amended. 2. This permit is valid only for connection to structures which have fully complied with County zoning and building requirements. Connection to or use with any dwelling or structure not approved by the building and zoning departments shall automatically be a violation of a requirement of the permit and cause for both legal action and revocation of the permit. 3. Section III, 3.21 requires any person who constructs, alters, or installs an individual sewage disposal system to be licensed according to the Regulations. FINAL APPROVAL OF SYSTEM: No system shall be deemed to be in compliance with the Eagle County Individual Sewage Disposal System Regulations until the installed system is approved prior to covering any part. Installed Absorption or Dispersal Area:° sq. ft. a- T7t1C Installed Septic Tank: gallons. Design Engineer of System: Installer of System: L, Septic tank cleanout to within 12" of final grade or aerated access ports above grade? Yes No Proper materials and assembly? Yes No Compliance with permit requirements? Yes No Compliance with County/State regulations requirements? Yes No COMMENTS: (Any item checked "No" requires correction before final approval of system is made. Arrange a re -inspection when work is completed.) DATE: INSPECTOR: RE -INSPECTION DATE: WZ1510' INSPECTOR: S .�/ ri_tr-\�t KtIUKN IH13 rUKIIUN W1IH TUUK J1It FLAIN HiJU rtt5 328-7311 949-5257 927-3823 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH BOX 850 EAGLE, COLORADO 81631 PERMIT FEE _ $75 PERCOLATION - 0 APPLICATION FOR INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PERMIT o NO. O �� NAME OF OWNER:c�SP ADDRESS: ®, © /DE17 Z�� //a PHONE: ��7Y23 NAME OF APPLICANT (IF DIFFERENT FROM OWNER): ADDRESS: DESIGN ENGINEER OF SYSTEM (IF APPLICABLE): ADDRESS: PHONE: PHONE: PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR INSTALLATION OF SYSTEM: (Ve,& ei ADDRESS: PHONE: PERMIT APPLICATION IS FOR: ( New Installation ( ) Alteration ( ) Repair LOCATION OF PROPOSED FACILITY: County Lot Size des City or Town, if within City or Town Limits LEGAL DESCRIPTION: STREET (RURAL) ADDRESS: �_f ;? z21_"2 � h IS SYSTEM DESIGNED FOR LESS THAN 2,000 GALLONS PER DAY? (LT —Yes BUILDING OR SERVICE TYPE: (Check applicable category) ( Residential - Single-family dwelling ( ) Residential - Duplex ( ) Commercial - State usage # Persons ( ) No Residential - Triplex Residential - Quadplex # Bedrooms "R WASTE TYPES: (Check all applicable) ( ) Commercial or Institutional ( we ling ( ) Non-domes.tic wastes ( ) Transient Use ( ) Other - SOURCE AND TYPE OF 14ATER SUPPLY: ( Well ( ) Spring Give depth of all wells within 200 feet of the system: If supplied by communi y water, give name of supplier: TYPE OF INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE ISPOSAL SYSTEM PROPOSED: ( Septic Tank ( ) Aeration Plant ( ) ( ) Vault Privy ( ) Composting Toilet ( ) ( ) Pit Privy ( ) Incineration Toilet ( ) ( ) Greywater ( ) Other ( ) Garbage Grinder ( 4-- utomati c flasher ( ) Creek or Stream 11�1 & 8-4C4� Chemical Toilet Recycling, Potable Use Recycling, Other Use WILL EFFLUENT BE DISCHARGED DIRECTLY INTO WATERS OF THE STATE? ( ) Yes Signature Date —s�7 INFORMATION BELOW TO BE FILLED OUT BY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH OFFICER GROUND CONDITIONS: Percent Ground Slope: e7o Depth to Bedrock (per 8' Profile Hole): Depth to Groundwater Table:_ SOIL PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS: d & Minutes per inch in Hole No. 1 620 Minutes per inch in Hole No. 2 aC> Minutes per inch in Hole No. 3 FINAL DISPOSAL BY: ( .Absorption Trench, Bed or Pit ( ) Evapotranspiration ( ) Above Ground Dispersal ( ) Sand Filter ( ) Underground Dispersal ( ) Wastewater Pond ( ) Other EAGLE COUNTY EAGLE, COLORADO 81631 May 29, 1981 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 328-6809 ADMINISTRATION 328-6674 ANIMAL SHELTER 949-4292 ASSESSO R 328-6593 BUILDING INSPECTION 328-6339 CLERK & RECORDER Eagle 328-6377 Basalt 927-3244 COUNTY ATTORNEY 328-6674 ENGINEER 328-6337 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 328-7718 EXTENSION AGENT 328-6370 LIBRARY 328-7787 PUBLIC HEALTH Eagle 328-6594 Vail 476-5844 PLANNING 328-6338 ROAD & BRIDGE 328-6591 SHERIFF Eagle 328-6611 Basalt 927-3244 Gilman 827-5751 SOCIAL SERVICES 328-6328 TREASURER 328-6376 NOTES FOR LES SHAPID RO FROM SI:D FOX REGARDING INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM, FOR 3200 Squaw Creek Road ^ Colorow at Squaw Creek 1. Three sizes of leach field figured out for you:. 121 x 75' or 30' x 30' or 201 x 45' - This is the preferred leach.field size due to the lay of your land in relation to the leach field,. 2. Final grade to divert surface drainage away from the absorpt,on. system. 3. Need at least 6" gravel (2-21:-?" in sizel below and 2" of gravel above each line. Total of 12" of gravel on the bed, Must be level, Must use minimum 4" pipe. 4. Cover all wi.th.untreated building paper/straw. Backfill a minimum of 10". 5. Outermost disposal lines shall -be no less than 18" and no more than 36" from outside walls of hole., 6. Cast iron or heavy duty PVC w than ASTM of 3034 must be used. 5 ft. from the inlet and the: outlet, 7. Building sewer line fall/ft. OWNER: L LEGAL DESCRIPTI RURAL ADDRESS: �V7FEE: $50P LICATION NO. TYPE OF MlELLING : -�>ilu&z-p ; /,- # nF RFnRnnNrc . DATE OF TEST: Z �/g % TYPE OF SOIL: TEST HOLES PRESOAKED: YES V/ NO TIME WATER DEPTH INCHES OF FALL l 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 l RATE r 2 ' 3 PERCOLATION PATE: ( TANK SIZE: IL SOUARE FOOTAGE PER BEDROOM: LEACH FIELD SIZE: ftui g Site has been reviewed and tested For percolation rate. Ve recounend: APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL DATE: EAGLE COUNTY ENVI'RON`IE`iTAL H TH OFFICER EAGLE COUNTY memorandum To: Subject: *,Les Shapiro Non —point Source Control Techniques From: File No.: Date: Sid Fox, Environmental Health Nov. 18, 1981 Enclosed you will find selected non -point source control techniques that may help you control erosion along the road leading to Squaw Creek. These techniques are taken from the "Upper Eagle Valley Non -Point Source Assessment & Control Plan." if this office can be of further assistance, do not hesitate to call us at 328-7311 or 949-5257, ext. 239. SF/ncm Enclosures (Techniques N, O, P, U, W, DD, GG, LL) SOILS AND FOUNDATION INVESTIGATION FOR LOT IO, COLOROW AT SQUAW CREEK EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO PREPARED FOR: LES SHAPIRO PROJECT NUMBER: V-0202G f OCTOBER 6, 1980 TABLE OF CONTENTS CONCLUSIONS I SCOPE I SITE LOCATION AND DES.CRIPT'I.ON I SITE INVESTIGATION 2 SUBSURFACE AND GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS 2 PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION 2 FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATIONS 3 SLAB CONSTRUCTION 3 GROUNDWATER AND DRAIN SYSTEM 4 CRAWL SPACE COVER 4 BACKFILL AND SURFACE DRAINAGE 4 BACKFILL AND SURFACE DRAINAGE-cont. 5 LAWN IRRIGATION 5 MISCELLANEOUS 6 LOCATION OF TEST PIT Drawing No. I SOIL -PROFILE Figure No. I SWELL -CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Figure No. 2 DETAILS OF PERIPHERAL DRAIN SYSTEM Figure No. 3 CONCLUSIONS 1. Subsoil conditions are fairly uniform over the site with . topsoil to a depth of 2 feet; sand, silt, with fragmented.sand- stone to a depth of 6 feet underlain by sandy silt with some small gravel, light brown to red brown. 2. The proposed residence should be founded on conventional spread footings designed for a maximum soil bearing pressure of 1500 psf. SCOPE This report presents the results of a Soils and Foundation Investigation for the proposed residence on Lot 10, Colorow at - Squaw Creek, Eagle County, Colorado. The investigation was prepared by means of test pits and laboratory testing of samples obtained from this pit. This investigation presents a description of surface and sub- surface conditions encountered at the site, recommended foundation systems, allowable design pressures, groundwater conditions as well as design and construction criteria influenced by the subsoils. - SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION The site is located in a part of Section 13, Township 5 South, - Range:83 West, of the 6th`Principal Meridian. The site is situated in a meadow of native grasses and sage brush surrounded by deciduous and coniferous trees. K SITE INVESTIGATION The field investigation performed on Sept. 16, 1980 consisted of excavating, logging and sampling one test pit. The location of the test pit is shown on Drawing No.l. A summary of the test pit log is detailed on Figure No. I. A summary of the test results are shown on Figure No. 2. The test pits were excavated with a conventional b,ackhoe. Lab- oratory sample were obtained by driving a standard thin walled samp- ler into undisturbed soils. - SUBSURFACE AND GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS Refer to the summary of the test pit, Figure No. I. Subsurface conditions are fairly uniform, with topsoil to a depth of two feet; sand and silt with fragmented sandstone to a depth of six feet; underlain by sandy silt with some small gravel, light brown to red brown, moist. No groundwater was encountered in the test pit at time of excavation. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION No specific design data has been provided, but for the purpose of this analysis, it has been presumed that the proposed residence - will consist of two floors with a basement, and that loads will be 3 light. If the proposed project differs significantly from this understanding, a review should be made after the plans are more complete. FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATIONS Very low to non -swelling sandy silts will be encountered in the excavation. The proposed residence should be founded on conventional type spread footings designed for a maximum soil bearing pressure of 1500 psf (dead load plus one-half live load). At this pressure, foundation settlements will be tolerable. It would be adviseable to proportion footings so as to minimize differential settlements. The bottom of the footing should be placed a minimum of 48 inches below final grade for frost protection. SLAB CONSTRUCTION The soils that will support slabs are stable at their natural moisture contents. However, changes in this natural moisture content ` may cause some consolidation. To minimize any possible damage that could be caused by consolidation of the soils supporting interior slabs, the slabs should be separated from all bearing members and utility lines to allow their independent movements. Slabs should be scored into maximum 200 square foot areas to localize and control any cracking and heaving. GROUNDWATER AND DRAIN SYSTEM While little or.no ground water was encountered at the time the field investigation was conducted, it is possible' that seasonal variations will cause fluctuations, or a water table to be present in the upper soils during the spring months, or after a prolonged period of rain. Foundations should be protected by a peripheral drain system as shown in figure 3. CRAWL SPACE COVER When moist soils are encountered in the excavation, the ground surface in crawl space areas should be covered with an impervious moisture barrier sealed against the footings. This will help to reduce humidity in the crawl space area and will also prevent the moist foundation soils from drying and shrinking, which could possibly cause the structure to settle. BACKFILL AND SURFACE DRAINAGE The potentially consolidating foundation sails encountered in portions of the site should be prevented from being wetted after construction. Generally, this can be accomplished by insuring that the backfill placed around the foundation walls will not settle after completion of construction and that the backfill material Is relatively impervious. Water should be added to backfill material to allow proper compaction -- do not puddle. 6q BACKFI(L AND SURFACE DRAINAGE --continued Surface water running toward the structure from upslope areas should be diverted around and away from the building by means of drainage swales or other similar measures. The final grade should have a positive slope away from the found- ation walls on all sides. A minimum of 12 inches in the first ten feet is recommended. Downspouts and sill cocks should discharge'Into splash blocks should slope from the foundation walls. The use of long downspout extensions in place of splash blocks is advisable. LAWN IRRIGATION Do not install sprinkler systems next to foundation walls, porches or patio slabs. If sprinkler systems are installed, the sprinkler heads should be placed so that the spray from the heads, under full pressure, does not fall within five feet of foundation walls, porches or patio slabs. Lawn irrigation must be controlled. If the future owners desire to plant next to foundation walls, porches or patio slabs, and are willing to assume the risk of struc- tural damage, etc., then it is advisable to plant only flowers a.nd shrubbery (no lawn) of varieties that require very little moisture. These flowers and shrubs should be hand -watered only. rel MISCELLANEOUS Some of the soils at the site are potentially consolidating and the owner should be cautioned that there is some -risk of future damage. The owner is directed to those items covered under BACKFILL AND SURFACE DRAINAGE, and LAWN IRRIGATION. Our experience has shown that damage due to swelling or consolidating soils usually results from saturation of the foundation soils caused by improper drainage, excessive irrigation, and poorly conso- lidated backfills. The elimination of the potential sources of excessive water will greatly minimize the risks of construction of this site. The findings and recommendations of this report have been obtained in accordance with accepted professional engineering practices in the field of Foundation Engineering and Soil Mecha- nics. There is no other warranty, either express or implied. y PAUL P Al C" � e e s. gj (Y ss, . �« �QJNA Sincerely, INTER -MOUNTAIN ENGINEERING, LTD. G. Thomas A I I en Field Engineer Reviewed and Approved By: G teve Reiner, P.E. Chief Soils Engineer TEST PIT NO. I 0 O DATE DRILLED: ELEVATION: p DEPTH t� Or2OA Lt� IN FEET DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL REMARKS 0 TOPSOIL SAND AND SILT with brown fragmente-d sand- 5 stone SANDY SILT/ some Tight moist small gravel brown to red ` 10 - brown Bottom of test pit No groundwater 12' encountered 15 20 25 30 - - Sm I L PROFILE PROPOSED RESIDENCE LOT 10, COLOROW AT SQUAW CREEK EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO FOR LES SHAPIRO- PROJECT NO.: V- 0 2 0 2 G FIGURE NO.: I c 0 I 2 3 4 5 6 0 0 niii�y■ lipsllllBORING NOTEST. DEPTH 9* ■�11l1 Od 0.1 l.0 LOAD (KSFr 10 700 SAMPLE OF S I' LT, SANDY NAT. MOISTURE CONTENT 6. 1 % * HAND DRIVE SAMPLE NAT. DRY DENSITY I 0 3 PCF ADD I J I ONIAL�C JN PRES URE D E T TEST PIT #1 DEPTH 12 1 * AT I ONI UNIER) CrIS TING V.I l.0 LUAU IKSF) 10 700 SAMPLE OF S I LT, SANDY NAT. MOISTURE CONTENT 8' 6 % * HAND DRIVE SAMPLE NAT. DRY DENSITY 19 I PCF SWELL - CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS PROPOSED RESIDENCE LOT 10, COLOROW A-T SQUAW CREEK EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO FOR LES SHAPIRO PROJECT NO V- 0 2 0 2 G FIGURE NO 2 0 oe Foundation Wa l l Backf i I.I 'mo i stened \—and well compacted Polyethelene Moisture'Barrie glued to foundation wall #15 Felt - Paper M i n i mum of 6" of 3/4 inch gravel '4" Diameter Perforated Pipe sloped a -minimum of 0.25% to sewer lateral subdrain, sump pump. or daylighted DETAILS OF PERIPHERAL DRAIN SYSTEtl - FOR FOOTING TYPE FOUNDATION F I GUP,E 3 USUy lit 10, Coiorow Subdivision, .. NAME Rd SHAPIRO ,/ 00aqo'2C) (�D[0f-D0 JOB NO. _ OS LOCATION BILL TO DATE STARTED DATE COMPLETED DATE BILLED PZ6 -� Lad,, JOB COST SUMMARY TOTAL SELLING PRICE TOTAL MATERIAL PERMIT #509 OWNER: Leslie S. Shapiro (An'ivi� ��G�iif LOCATION: Colorow and Squaw Creekzo INSTALLER: Owner & Cal Edwards SIZE OF TANK: 1,000 gallons DWELLING: Residential - 3 bedrooms x 280 sq.ft. PERC RATE: one inch/20 minutes (840-900 sq.ft.) Finalized: 9-25-81 By: Sid Fox j =r f� '�vl� +``fir „ , i7hrr TOTAL LABOR INSURANCE SALES TAX MISC. COSTS TOTAL JOB COST - GROSS PROFIT LESS OVERHEAD COSTS to OF SELLING PRICE NET PROFIT ZIy; !L®ER Printed in U.S,A. c'��!�I -true - north 14 magnetic