400%
200%
100%
75%
50%
25%
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2100 Colorow - 210713402011 - 1860-99
INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PERMIT EAGLE COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION P.O. Box 179 - 500 Broadway • Eagle, CO 81631 Telephone: (970) 328-8755 COPY OF PERMIT MUST BE POSTED AT INSTALLATION SITE. PERMIT NO. 1860-99 BP NO. 12486 OWNER: ROLAND RADLER PHONE: 970-524-6510 MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 792, GYPSUM, CO 81037 APPLICANT: SAME PHONE: SYSTEM LOCATION: 2100 COLOROW RD- EDWARDS, CO TAX PARCEL NO. 2107-134-02-01 l LICENSED INSTALLER: BIGHORN EXCAVATING, RON GROUT _ LICENSE NO. 2-99 PHONE: 970-328-6209 DESIGN ENGINEER: PHONE NO. INSTALLATION HEREBY GRANTED FOR THE FOLLOWING: 2250 GALLON SEPTIC TANK 2250 SQUARE FEET OF ABSORPTION AREA VIA 73 CHAMBERED UNITS SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS: IF 2 TANKS ARE USED (1250, 1000 GALLONS), THE BAFFLE 1N THEIST TANK (1250) MUST BE REMOVED. INSTALL LEACH FIELD IN SERIAL DISTRIBUTION 1N TRENCHES WITH A CLEAN OUT BETWEEN THE TANK AND THE HOUSE, FOR EVERY 100 FEET OF PIPE RUN, AND INSPECTION PORTS IN EACH TRENCH. MAKE SURE THAT THE TRENCHES RUN ALONG THE CONTOURS OF THE SLOPE, AND INSTALL IN THE AREA BETWEEN THE 2ND AND 3RD PERC TEST HOLES. RAKE ALL TRENCH SURFACES_ TO PREVENT SMEARING OF SOILS, AND DO NOT INSTALL IN WET WEATHER. CALL EAGLE COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH FOR FINAL INSPECTION PRIOR TO BACK FILLING ANY PART OF THE INSTALLATION OR WITH ANY OUESTIONS REGARDING THE INSTALLATION, BUILDING CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL THE SEPTIC SYS- TEM HAS RECEIVED FINAL APPROVAL, ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH APPROVAL: DATE: SEPTEMBER 7, 1999 CONDITIONS: 1, ALL INSTALLATIONS MUST COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE EAGLE COUNTY INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM REGULATIONS, ADOPTED PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GRANTED IN 25-10-104, 1973, AS AMENDED. 2. THIS PERMIT IS VALID ONLY FOR CONNECTION TO STRUCTURES WHICH HAVE FULLY COMPLIED WITH COUNTY ZONING AND BUILDING REQUIREMENTS, CONNECTION TO OR USE WITH ANY DWELLING OR STRUCTURE NOT APPROVED BY THE ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENTS SHALL AUTOMATICALLY BE A VIOLATION OF A REQUIREMENT OF THE PERMIT AND WILL RESULT IN BOTH LEGAL ACTION AND REVOCATION OF THE PERMIT. 3. CHAPTER IV, SECTION 4.03.29 REQUIRES ANY PERSON WHO CONSTRUCTS, ALTERS OR INSTALLS AN INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM TO BE LICENSED. FINAL APPROVAL OF SYSTEM (TO BE COMPLETED BY INSPECTOR): NO SYSTEM SHALL BE DEEMED TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE EAGLE COUNTY INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM REGULATIONS UNTIL THE SYSTEM IS APPROVED PRIOR TO COVERING ANY PORTION OF THE SYSTEM. INSTALLED ABSORPTION OR DISPERSAL AREA: 2250 SQUARE FEET (VIA 73 INFILTRATOR UNITS ) INSTALLED CONCRETE SEPTIGANK: 2500 GALLONS IS LOCATED 3_14 DEGREES AND '15 FEET INCHES FROM —THE CORNER OF THE HOU';F.- COMMENTS: FINAL INSPECTION DONE BY HEATHER SAVALOX ON 9-21-99. ADDTTTONAT. PHOTOS nT, THE PT -RAN OUT INSTALLATION WERE RECEIVED ON 12-3-99 FROM THE INSTALLER THE RFPTTf. TANK IS GIVER-SIZE.n TO ACCOMMODATE 8 BEDROOMS, BUT THE LEACH FIELD IS ONLY -_LARGE ENOUGH FOR 5 BEDROOMS- FUTURE EXPANSION WILL REQUIRE ADDITION LEACH FIELD AREA TO BF jN�T�I�FD ANY ITEM NOT MEETING REQUIREMENTS WILL BE CORRECTED BEFORE FINAL APPROVAL F Y E ADE. ARRANGE A RE-1NSPECTION WHEN WORK IS COMPLETED. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH APPROVAL DATE: DECEMBER 6, 1999 Incomplete Applications Will NOT Be Accepted (Site Plan MUST be attached) ISDS Permit # %6 - [ r Building Permit # (2-4AG APPLICATION FOR INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PERMIT ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH OFFICE - EAGLE COUNTY P. O. BOX 179 EAGLE, CO 81631 328-8755/927-3823 (El Jebel) ************************************************************************** * PERMIT APPLICATION FEE $150.00 PERCOLATION TEST FEE $200.00 * * MAKE ALL REMITTANCE PAYABLE TO: "EAGLE COUNTY TREASURER" ************************************************************************** PROPERTY OWNER: O L MAILING ADDRESS: R o - @c Z PHONE: Q APPLICANT/CONTACT PERSON: x�oG4 J * P(A, PHONE: 524-010 92r-9322 LICENSED SYSTEMS CONTRACTOR: I C—,3<CAv( PHONE: .Rom Che-0Cj-( - COMPANY/DBA : 'B(G - +- Q V- N FkC-4,- V — ADDRESS: •�4 ��• ( f� PERMIT APPLICATION IS FOR: (jo NEW INSTALLATION ( ) ALTERATION ( ) REPAIR LOCATION OF PROPOSED INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL S STEM: L©T � A _ C OC-O r-OW A-T S Q&A- W G � Legal Description: Tax Parcel Number: Lot Size: Physical Address: 2 C- O 8 SGLOA-,LJ BUILDING TYPE: (Check applicable category) Residential/Single Family Number of Bedrooms 23 ( ) Residential/Multi-Family* Number of Bedrooms ( ) Commercial/Industrial* Type TYPE OF WATER SUPPLY: 4>c) Well ( ) ( ) Public Name *These syst (Check applicable category) Spring ( ) Surface of Supplier: sign by a Registered Professional Engineer SIGNATURE: Date: i ************************************************************************** AMOUNT PAID: ✓�� RECEIPT #: DATE: yI� CHECK #: ojjdA CASHIER: -1 GQ N 7;4C 677��I� 74T- 32443 - 2 3 3O aol-, -5 9 a - 5* 17 Community Development Department (970)328-8730 FAX (970) 328-7185 TDD (970) 328-8797 Email: eccmdeva@vail.net http: Ilwww.eagle-county.com EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO DATE: May 24, 1999 TO: Bighorn Excavation FROM: Environmental Health Division Eagle County Building P.O. Box 179 500 Broadway Eagle, Colorado 81631-0179 RE: Issuance of Individual Sewage Disposal System Permit No. 1860-99, Tax Parcel #2107-134-02-011. Property Location: 2100 Colorow Rd., Edwards, CO., Radler residence. Enclosed is your ISDS Permit No. 1860-99. It is valid for 120 days. The enclosed copy of the permit must be posted at the installation site. Any changes in plans or specifications invalidates the permit unless otherwise approved. Also enclosed is the ISDS Final Inspection Completeness Form. The items on this form need to be completed before you call for your final inspection. Also, please note any special conditions which may have been placed on the permit. If all items are not completed, a reinspection fee of $42.50 must be paid before a reinspection is made. Please call our office well in advance to allow for scheduling of final inspection. Your building permit TCO will not be issued until final approval has been given for the ISDS Permit. Permit specifications are minimum requirements only, and should be brought to the property owner's attention. This permit does not indicate conformance with other Eagle County requirements. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact the Environmental Health Division at 328- 8755. cc: files Enclosures: ISDS permit # 1860-99; ISDS Final Inspection Completeness Form Community Development Department (970) 328-8730 FAX (970) 328-7185 TDD (970) 328-8797 Email: eccmdeva@vail.net http: //www.eagle-county.com December 6, 1999 Roland Radler P.O. Box 792 Gypsum, CO 81637 EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO Eagle County Building P.O. Box 179 500 Broadway Eagle, Colorado 81631-0179 RE: Final of ISDS Permit #1860-99, Tax Parcel #2107-134-02-011. Property location: 2100 Colorow Rd., Edwards, CO. Dear Mr. Radler: This letter is to inform you that the above referenced ISDS Permit has been inspected and finalized. Enclosed is a copy to retain for your records. This permit does not indicate compliance with any other Eagle County requirements. Also enclosed is a br6chure regarding the care of your septic system. Be aware that later changes to your building may require appropriate alterations of your septic system. If you have any questions regarding this permit, please contact the Eagle County Environmental Health Division at (970) 328-8755. Sincerely, jo��(atL Janet Kohl Post -if' Fax Note Environmental Health Department Fr-o;Dlpt- P ' Eagle County Community Development # ENCL: Informational Brochure Final ISDS Permit cc: files 7671 Date I pages From Co. A' Phone itF' J Fax # I SDS Permit # f Sb0 - {1 Date 1 z3 q a d iPi►r- TSDS Final Inaggg ion J� Tank is T -�'DU gal. Tank Material &Vck Tank is located ft. and Jai , degrees fro (permanent landmarks Tank is located ft. and degrees from (permanent landmark) �* Tank set level. Tank lids within 8" of finished grade. Size of field ft2 3 units lineal ft. Technology �- - h f b/a L r DCleanout is installed in between tank and house(+ 1/100ft). f� There is a "T" that goes down 14 inches in the inlet and outlet of the tank. Inlet and outlet is sealed with tar tape, rubber gaske etc. Tank has two compartments with the larger compartment closest to the % house. V Measure distance and relative direction to field. 115 C &n,6 - Depth of field _ ft. 1/ Soil interface raked. V Inspection portals at the end of each trench. Proper distance to setbacks. Chambers properly installed as per manufacturers specifications. (Chambers latched, end plates properly installed, rocks femoved from t h etc } renc es, Type of pipe used for building sewer line 51Y 3 ` leach S- field5 Other .T'���-31 _ Inspection meets Copy form to installer's file if recommendations for improvement were suggested. ACTION TAKEN: Setbacks Well Potable House Property Lake Dry Tank Drain Water Lines linp- Stream Gulgb Field 100 25 20 10 50 25 10 10 j, nk 50 10 5 10 50 10 * 10 rDB EAGLE COUNTY ENV. HEALTH P.O. BOX 179 SHEET NO. OF EAGLE, CO 81631 CALCULATED BY DATE CHECKED BY DATE SCALE PA9W t0e-t (Sgft Shari M&i (ftftWl ®mi. fiMlK M&U.0tVl to W RM T0U na t400-pY 4W i ISDS PERMIT # i�9 PERCOLATION TEST EAGLE COMMENVIRONMENTAL HEATLH OWNER: ol! -PHSYSICAL ADDRESS: Z 106 gcu .e.{ccr .CA_ LEGAL DESCRIPTION: MAILING ADDRESS: TYPE OF DWELLING: r- s- {_ NUMBER OF BEDROOMS: TEST HOLES PRE-SOAKED: TIME WATER DEPTH INCHES OF FALL RATE .. 1 • _ // 1 _ e_ InwCL_ -A. /_ / a cln-i._-) SOIL PROFILE nI e i' wo mmmmmom mm,mmmmmmm,.p mm. m1mmmmmm mmmmmmmmmm mmmmmmmm 96M mmmmmmmm me mmmmmommo TIME TO DROP LAST INCH: PERC RATE: ko !ad l 1' m aG�-r�r MINIMUM LFA1 H FIELD SIZE: MINIMUM SEPTIC TANK SIZE: ZZ�SO4_ ._ Zf qq ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SPECIALIST DATE s�0zZlo S�LQ,S I Clien O Nort her n, Inc. Cunsurpnq [ngm�rr� bntl SCwnrists SUBSOIL STUDY FOR FOUNDATION DESIGN PROPOSED RESIDENCE LOT 6A, COLOROW AT SQUAW CREEK EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO JOB NO. 4 136 93 DECEMBER 30, 1992 PREPARED FOR: W. JOHN PRITCHARD 7304 LANDON LANE NEW ALBANY OH 43054 A mem b2r Of the HIH group0l ranp,7nreS 5080 goad 154 Gfenwood Sp„ngs Coto+ado 81601 303 945.7458 303 945-2363 facsimac ChenONoilhern_Inc. Cgnsulhnr [nr.unn1; ano $Urniisis I I I I I I I December 30, 1992 W. John Pritchard 7304 Landon Lane New Albany OH 43054 5060 Road Ir, Glenwood SOnnLIS. Colorarlo 81601 303 945-1458 303 945.2363 Facsim-le Subject: Subsoil Study for Foundation Design, Proposed Residence, Lot 6A, Colorow at Squaw Creek, Eagle County, Colorado. Job No. 4 136 93 Dear Mr. Pritchard: As requested, we have conducted a subsoil study at the subject site, located on Lot 6A, Colorow at Squaw Creek in Eagle County, Colorado. Subsurface conditions encountered in the exploratory borings drilled in the proposed building area are variable and generally consist of clayey sand and gravel overlying sandstone and siltstone bedrock. The clay fraction of the upper soil has a relatively high plasticity and may have a low expansion potential when wetted. Groundwater was not encountered in the borings at the time of drilling. The proposed residence can be founded on spread footings placed on the natural subsoils or bedrock and designed for an allowable bearing pressure of 2500 psf and a minimum dead load pressure of 600 psf. The foundation bearing soils should be evaluated at the time of excavation to determine if expansive soils are present. The report which follows describes our investigation, summarizes our findings, and presents our recommendations. It is important that we provide consultation during design, and field services during construction to review and monitor the implementation of the geotechnical recommenda- tions. If you have any questions regarding this report, please contact us. Sincerely, CHEN-NORTHERN, INC. Thomas L. Allen, P.E. TLA/ec ' Rev. By: SLP A m-mbar 01 the gogroup of cornpanil5 -12- SURFACE DRAINAGE The following drainage precautions should be observed during construction and maintained at all times after the residence has been completed: 1) Excessive wetting or drying of the foundation excavations and underslab areas should be avoided during construction. Drying could increase the expansion potential of clay soils. 2) Exterior backfill should be adjusted to near optimum moisture and compacted to at least 95 % of the maximum standard Proctor density in pavement areas and to at least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density in landscape areas. Free -draining wall backfill should be capped with about 2 to 3 feet of the on -site soils to reduce surface water infiltration. 3) The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be sloped to drain away from the foundation in all directions. We recommend a minimum slope of 12 inches in the first 10 feet in unpaved areas and a minimum slope of 3 inches in the first 10 feet in paved areas. 4) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill. PERCOLATION TESTING Percolation testing was performed at the locations shown on Fig. 1. Two profile holes were drilled at the locations shown on Fig. 1 to determine a suitable area for percolation testing. The logs of the profile holes are shown on Fig. 2. The subsurface conditions encountered in Profile Hole 1 consist of about 1 foot of topsoil over about 1 foot of clayey gravel. Sandstone bedrock was encountered at a depth of 2 feet to the full depth of exploration, 8 feet. Profile Chen i& Northern, Inc. Cnnswl'.rci Ello. e#S and S6,entjSIS 13 Hole 2 was drilled southeast of the proposed building location. The subsoils encountered consist of 1 foot of topsoil overlying clayey gravel to a depth of 8 feet. No free water was encountered in the profile holes. The shallow bedrock encountered in Profile Hole i indicates this area will likely be unsuitable for a conventional infiltration septic stem. P Y Percolation testing was performed in three shallow 7-inch diameter borings near Profile Hole 2. The results of the percolation testing are presented in Table II. The results indicate infiltration into the subsoils is very slow and a conventional infiltration septic system may not be feasible at this site. The slow percolation rates may be due to a combination of the soil type and density and auger hole testing and may not be representative of the true infiltration rate for these soils. The auger drilling operation can cake or smear the sides of the boring which can reduce the percolation rate. We recommend additional testing be performed in larger backhoe dug holes to better determine infiltration rates. If the rates remain slow, an evaporation/transpiration septic system may be a feasible alternative to a conventional infiltration system. The selected system should be designed by a qualified engineer familiar with local Iregulations pertaining to septic disposal systems LIMITATIONS This report has been prepared in accordance with generally accepted soil and foundation engineering practices in this area for use by the client for design purposes. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the exploratory borings drilled at the locations indicated on Fig. 1, the proposed type of construction and our experience in the area. The nature and extent of subsurface variations across the site may not I Chen@Northern,'Inc. consllllorl EINJ�ngi�rs .lnd SCIenI1SiS -14- become evident until excavation is performed- if during construction, fill, soil, rock or water conditions appear to be different from those described herein, this office should be advised at once so reevaluation of the recommendations may be made. We recommend on -site observation of excavations and foundation bearing strata and testing of structural fill by a representative of the soil engineer. Sincerely, CHEN-NORTHERN, INC. Thomas L. Allen, P.E. Reviewed By Steven L. Pawlak, P.E. Chen Northern, Inc Cnnsu4•aq tnqul"i5 anQ SUen1�SJS APPROXIMATE SCALE = 120 LOT 7 A I LOT 6 A LOT 5 A BUILDING I ENVELOPE I PROFILE HOLE I • BORING 2 P 3Q 0 *BORING I Q P i ENCH MARK Q PROFILE HOLE 2 GROUND AT BASE OF P 2 LARGE PINE TREE; ELEV. = 100.0' , ASSUMED. Z ROAD EASEMENT i 4 136 93 Chen Northern,Inc LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS Fig.I AND PERCOLATION TEST HOLES Profile Profile Boring 1 Boring 2 Hole 1 Hole 2 Elev_ = 101.8' Elev. = 109.2' Elev. = 95.4' Elev. = 106.3' 110 110 35/12 oe o -200=49 37/12 105 ,� LL=55 P1=24 WC-14 -200=66 105 LL=34 30/6,15/0 '" Q P1-12 �• ° 24/12 0 100 17/12 0 100 WC=14 80/8 - -200=27 LL=36 52/12 P1=10 � 95 -� 26/12 95 +� ai 0 22/6,30/1 .r. o +-1 > 15/3,15/0 b W 90 L 70/12 90 30/0 10 30/0 85IM IL 60/6 85 50/6,15/0 80 60/2 80 75 75 Note: Explanation of symbols presented on Fig. 3. 4 136 93 Chen* Northern, Logs of Exploratory Borings Fig• 2 LEGEND: 0 Topsoil; sandy silt, clayey, stiff, black, organic. Gravel (GC-CL); clayey, very sandy, medium dense to dense, moist, brown to reddish brown, clayey sand in Boring 1. Am IN SiItstone Bedrock, hard, slightly moist, red -brown. IN Sandstone Bedrock; hard, slightly moist, gray, highly fractured. hRelatively undisturbed drive sample; 2-inch I.D. California liner sample. Drive sample; Standard Penetration Test (SPT), 1 3/8-inch I.D. split spoon sample, ASTM D-1586. 26/12 Drive sample blow count; indicates that 26 blows of a 140-pound hammer falling 30 inches were required to drive the California or SPT sampler 12 inches. NOTES: 1. Exploratory borings were drilled on December 10, 1992 with 4-inch diameter continuous flight power auger. 2. Locations of exploratory borings were measured approximately by pacing from features shown on the site plan provided. 3. Elevations of exploratory borings were measured by instrument level survey and refer to the Bench Mark on Fig. 1. 4. The exploratory boring locations and elevations should be considered accurate only to the. degree implied by the method used. 5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory boring logs represent the approximate boundaries between material types and transitions may be gradual. 6. No free water was encountered in the borings at the time of drilling. Fluctuations in water level may occur with time. 7. Laboratory Testing Results: WC = Water Content (%) +4 = Percent retained on No. 4 sieve -200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve LL = Liquid Limit (%) PI = Plasticity Index (%) 14 136 93 1 Chen* Northern, Inc. I Legend and Notes I Fig. 3 rh ON U) m d yj F" J w cr W ui as LL O } M 2 D vi x W a b v cc C ro u ry c_ y 6 V1 m GJ 7 IV CO S_ w w?a xQw a Ujy DO X H0�t N Q J u J a Q m w s� up Ora dl d U7 U] I% N d o K N 1 cs `J Q T cc H F OZ� =W O qxz 7 W a1 d ZOV? d' X = 4 Oku N d ySO O J QN w a < e N Z Q O a N Job No. 4 136 93 December 11, 1992 TABLE II PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS WATER WATER LENGTH DEPTH AT DEPTH AT DROP IN AVERAGE HOLV- OF START OF END OF WATER PERCOLATION HOLE DEPTH INTERVAL INTERVAL INTERVAL LEVEL RATE NO. (In.) (Min.) (Inches) (Inches) (Inches) (Min./Inch) P-1 48 30 311/4 31 1/4 0 30 31 1/4 311/2 1/4 25 31 1/2 31 1/2 0 220 P-2 48 30 33 33 1/2 1/2 30 33 1/2 331/2 0 25 33 1/2 33 5/8 1/8 440 P-3 52 30 36 361/8 1/8 30 361/8 361/4 1/8 25 361/4 361/4 0 440 Chen O Northern, Inc. COnst"10,C) E,tgnugfs ana 5c:enusis CLASSIFICATION OF SOILS FOR ENGINEERING PURPOSES Chen -Northern, Inc. ASTM Designation: D 2487 - 83 (Based on Unified Soil Classification System) Cl I Criteria for Assigning Group Symbols and Group Names Using Laboratory Tests' Sod Classification Group Symbol Name' Coarse -Grained Soils Gravels Clean Gravels Cu24 and 15Cc53` GW Well graded gravel' More than 50% retained on More than 50% coarse Less than 5% fines` No. 200 sieve traction retained on Cu<4 and/or 1>Cc>3r GP Poorly graded gravel' No. 4 sieve Gravels with Fines Fines classify as ML or MH GM Silty gravel' `« More than 12% finest Fines classify as CL or CH GC Clayey gravel' Sands Clean Sands Cu2:6and 15Cc53' SW Well -graded sand' 50% or more of coarse Less than 5%fines° fraction passes No. Cu<6 and/or I>Cc>3' SP Poorly graded sand' 4 sieve Sands with Fines Fines classify as ML or MH SM Silly sand` More than 12% fines' Fines classify as CL or CH Sc Clayey sand`"' Fine -Grained Soils Silts and Clays inorganic PI>7 and plots on or above CL Lean clay" " 50% or more passes the Liquid limit less thah 50 "A" fine' No. 200 sieve PI<4 or plots below "A" ML Sill' line' organic Liquid limit - oven dried <0 75 OL Organic clay' Liquid limit - not dried Organic silt` ` Sills and Clays inorganic PI plots on or above "A" line CH Fat clay' "' Liquid limit 50 or more PI plots below "A" tine MH Elastic silt` `" organic Liquid limit -oven dried <0.75 OH Organic clay' Liquid limit - not dried Organic silt` Highly organic soils Primarily organic matter- dark in color• and organic odor PT Peat 'Based on the material passing the 34n. (75-mm) sieve. 'If field sample eorilained cobbles or boulders, or both, add -selh cobbles or boulders, at both- to group name. 'Gravels with 5 to .12% fines require duel symbols: GW-GM well -graded gravel with sill GW GC well -graded gravel with clay GP -GM p0041y graded gravel with silt GP -GC poorly graded gravel with clay 'Sands wlfil 5 to 12% lines require dual symbols: SW-SM well -graded sand with sill SW -SC well -graded send with clay SP-SM poorly graded sand with sill SP-SC 0.rsofly graded send v jIh clay 1f11�Boman 1 ' 11111 ■■■■■.MMEMEMI -1 III 611MEME■N1 1�1INNE ■N■a1 11,RE"MOMMI 1111MEMEN■M1 0 so to i I.a 0.5 010 PARTICLE SizE IN MILLIMETERS 'Cu a 0w10r• Cc-10`)r- 0.-0. 'if soil contains E15% sand. add "with Sand- to group name. •11 fines glassily as CL-ML. use dual symbot GO -GM. or SC•S1A. -II lines are organic, add "with organic lines" to group name. 1t soil contains t15%gravel, add -with graver to group name, a- x to 0 z U N a 0. a It Allerberg limits plat in hatched area, soil Is it CL-ML. silly clay. 'If soil contains 15 to 29%plus No. 20o, add -with sand- o 'with gravel", whichever is predominant. *If soil contains ?30% plus No. 200, predominantly sand, add "sandy" to group name. 'If soil contains >_30% plus No. 200. predominantly gravel. add -gravelly- to group name. 'PI?dl and plots on or above Wiling, 113I<4 or pools below "A" line. 'Pt plots on or above 'A- Ong, •PI plots below "A- line ou For cludficedorl of fine-gralned sotl• errd fir"ralned fraction of eoaroe-gnU•d / 5o aob / Cqualion of -A--line lioritontal at PI . 4 to LL / �\a then PI = 0.73 (ILL-20) ,p 40 Equation of %r4ine Venial at ILL = 16 to PI s 7 / r, then PI = 0.91LL-6) / V 30 20 MHOROH GAP 10 7 ML on OL 4 n CL_M ' 0 10 t6 20 30 a0 su rw r0 so vu rw • ��� 15 700 G � lOY1=_ 52.31' :3.6 Io.. 0.075 a,•ioK o.d7s-Is LIQUID LIMIT (LL) COPELAND CONCRETE INCORPORATED Manufacturers of Precast Concrete Products Alto DWIrhbutor or ReWnd hems 28803 U.S. Hwy 6 Rifle, Colorado 81650 Phone 625-1112 Fax 626-1110 SOLD TOE 1 1 (L Y2i Ee Cc_ "Praise The Lord" 40 SNIP TO r F 1 C? f_�_ 2 ((? 1 r.I W(A vC/( S 0A C,O.C,. I -RESALE/ { MDSE. RM. MNO. P.O. NtAMBIER CUSTOMER N 3MAN PHONE NQ PERSON CA No JOB NAME 1MEltiHT REM Shipped DESCRIPTION UNIT PRx75 i EXTENSION jy 13��9c DELIVERY CHARGE cc JC. WARRANTY ON ASONE-LISTED MATERIAL JMUAD1NG NEW MACUINM PAWS i SUP UEM IS LIMITED TO TKAT"PROWDED BY THE MANUPACPUMER, CQPIES OF WNIGM ARE AWLABLE UPON IiEOUEBT. STATE TAX L�✓rr/ f r CiAR=IELD COUNTY TAX THANK YOU TOTAL �+tO CASH INVOICE 9 5 A FINANCE CHARGE OF 1 %% PER MONTH fWKCH IS AN ANNUAL PERCENTAGE RATE OF 18%) WILL 86 ADOED TO ALL A000UNT BALANCE8 THAT EXCEPD 30 OAYS. AN. SM7 i8bU-99 'laxif G1U/-1-i4-U/--Uli Lot 6A, Colorow RADLER JOB- NAME _ 2100 Colorow Rd., Squaw Creels Edwards JOB NO. ;6 F' M q �& I -JAoe -Ail a,l j „ � � �-1--1—� - � t� �-r�i - � -f- 7-1� ; _... `-..-, � � v � , • �� Cam, `� r, � .