HomeMy WebLinkAbout100 Big Pinon - 246502301001Incomplete Applications Will NOT Be Accepted (Site Plan MUST be attached) ISDS Permit # I 569 Building Permit # 0D APPLICATION FOR INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PERMIT ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH OFFICE - EAGLE COUNTY P. 0. BOX 179 EAGLE, CO 81631 328-8755/927-3823 (El Jebel) ************************************************************************** * PERMIT APPLICATION FEE $150.00 PERCOLATION TEST FEE $200.00 * * MAKE ALL REMITTANCE PAYABLE TO: "EAGLE COUNTY TREASURER" ************************************************************************** PROPERTY OWNER MAILING ADDRESS: �c� L- U .j2(1(Y1 PHONE:C/-2—;1-7/651 APPLICANT/CONTACT PERSON: C, PHONE: 7 LICENSED SYSTEMS CONTRACTOR: `!it 4Q4am PHONE COMPANY/DBA :� ���(C� - ADDRESS: ©1�5� [�1 �/ ��Le7^ *************************************************************************** PERMIT APPLICATION IS FOR: ( ) NEW INSTALLATION A ALTERATION ( ) REPAIR T,nrATTON nF PROPOSED INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM: Legal Description: 1-01/LrvvR Tax Parcel Number: a4(0Ohysic l6 as Address: aaZ�� L , BUILDI G TYPE: (Check applicable ( Residential/Single Family Residential/Multi-Family* ( ) Commercial/Industrial* s n/C0�IfiX-S0/X' ` ►ek a - Lot Size: -; 3ctcA category) oZ, Number of Bedrooms Number of Bedrooms Type TYPE 0,F, WATER SUPPLY: (Check applicable category) Well ( ) Spring ( ) Surface ( ) Public Name of Supplier: *These systems require design by a Registered Professional E in er SIGNATURE: *********** AMOUNT PAID Date: �l c RECEIPT #: DATE: CHECK #: CASHIER: Community Development Department (970) 328-8730 FAX (970) 328-7185 TDD (970) 328-8797 Email: eccmdeva@vail.net http: //www.eagle-county.com EAGLE COUNTY. COLORADO DATE: May 18, 1999 TO: . Frying Pan Construction FROM: Environmental Health Division Eagle County Building P.O. Box 179 500 Broadway Eagle, Colorado 81631-0179 RE: Issuance of Individual Sewage Disposal System Permit No. 1856-99, Tax Parcel #2465-023-01-011. Property Location: 0255 Little Pinon Drive, Carbondale, CO., Brucker garage apartment. Enclosed is your ISDS Permit No. 1856-99. It is valid for 120 days. The enclosed copy of the permit must be posted at the installation site.. Any changes in plans or specifications invalidates the permit unless otherwise approved. Also enclosed is the ISDS Final Inspection Completeness Form. The items on this form need to be completed before you call for your final inspection. Also, please note any special conditions which may have been placed on the permit. If all items are not completed, a reinspection fee of $42.50 must be paid before a reinspection is made. Please call our office well in advance to allow for scheduling of final inspection. Your building permit TCO will not be issued until final approval has been given for the ISDS Permit. Permit specifications are minimum requirements only, and should be brought to the property owner's attention. This permit does not indicate conformance with other Eagle County requirements. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact the Environmental Health Division at 328- 8755. cc: files Enclosures: ISDS permit # 1856-99; ISDS Final Inspection Completeness Form ISDS PERMIT # 15 _�- - 9? PERCOLATION TEST EAGLE COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEATLH OWNER gfaC e�K -PHSYSICAL ADDRESS: Z 55- Gam'#(e N:vton p�: ✓e LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Gaf " l3 Lawr u J esf� k J MAILING ADDRESS: TYPE OF DWELLING: r•s NUMBER OF BEDROOMS: TEST HOLES PRE-SOAKED: YES ✓ NO SOIL TIME WATER DEPTH INCHES OF FALL RATE PROFILE nI e ' Zt 1 3 E 10 4t � t 71 10' TIME TO DROP LAST INCH: = PERC RATE: 2 MINIMUM LEACH FIELD SIZE: MINIMUM SEPTIC TANK SIZE: 75N.1 ��� � ,,,ll _ll� ( <''° ['(�MMF,NTS_ (T��f,c �'' ZG1��� A(li, K�IG( fi w !12(i x/ Jw A4 5-�/ � q q ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SPECIALIST DATE AA rv, %w z d v ISDS Permit # / 01�y Building Permit # q'9 APPLICATION FOR INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PERMIT ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH OFFICE- EAGLE COUNTY P.O. BOX 179 EAGLE, CO 81631 328-8730/927-3823(Basalt) PERMIT APPLICATION FEE $150.00 PERCOLATION TEST FEE $125.00 PROPERTY OWNER: re , & //_ Co le,MAILING ADDRESS: Ur 2 "S �-r7T� �i s1ir�0J— gtIsz/PHONE: 7— f?7-3 APPLICANT/CONTACT PERSON: PHONE: 92 3 - G1r'6- LICENSED SYSTEMS CONTRACTOR: ADDRESS: PHONE: ********************************************************************** PERMIT APPLICATION IS FOR: (IV4 NEW INSTALLATION ( ) ALTERATION ( ) REPAIR -- LOCATION OF PROPOSED INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM: Legal Description: 4-o-r / '3 �7— 5(,60/ Parcel Number: _r-- oz..3 Lot size: r�Q�;�.- Physical Address: p0 S -L-r , RIYZolk" BUILDING TYPE: (Check Residential / ( Residential / ( ) Commercial / HOT TUB WATER CONSERVATION PLAN: TYPE OF WATER SUPPLY: Give depth of all applicable category) Single Family Number of Bedrooms Multi -Family* Number of Bedrooms Industrial* Type Yes ( ), No Yes ( ) No (p() Well spring ( ) Surface ( ) Public ( ) Name of Supplier: wells within 200 feet of system: 210 11;d, *These systems require design by a Registered Professional Engineer NOTE: SITE PLAN MUST BE ATTACHED TO APPLICATION MAKE ALL REMITTANCE PAYABLE TO: "EAGLE COUNTY TREASURER" SIGNATURE: 4;;�_ DATE: 6 /e ********************************************************** ************** AMOUNT PAID RECEIPT#( CHECK #_ TIME LOG Travel Perc Final i80 L? DATE: CASHIER: REPAIR PERMIT APPLICATION FOR INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEMS A permit fee of $150.00 shall be charged for alteration, enlargement or any repair involving alteration of an existing sewage disposal system. This fee is authorized by Eagle County Individual Sewage Disposal System Regulations adopted and effective March 27, 1980. For minor repairs of less than $100.00 for maintenance of the individual sewage disposal system, no fee shall be required. A percolation test fee of $125.00 shall be charged for all new leach fields on repair permits. Percolation testing may be waived at the discretion of the Environmental Health Officer on certain repair cases where prompt action must be taken to prevent a health hazard. IF PRESENT SYSTEM IS PRE-EXISTING, NON -CONFORMING, A NEW SYSTEM SHALL BE INSTALLED COMPLYING WITH ALL CURRENT REGULATIONS. IF A NEW SYSTEM IS REQUIRED, ALL FEES ARE APPLICABLE. DESCRIPTION OF PROBLEM/MALFUNCTION: TYPE AND SIZE OF SYSTEM PRESENTLY IN USE: DATE PRESENT SYSTEM WAS INSTALLED: PERMIT NUMBER FOR ORIGINAL SYSTEM, IF A PERMIT WAS ISSUED BY THIS DEPARTMENT: ## SITE PLAN BELOW SHOWING PRESENT SYSTEM COMPONENTS: OWNER OF SYSTEM: ADDRESS: APPLICANT: ADDRESS: PHONE: DATE: 2c/app 2/91 INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PERMIT EAGLE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH P.O. Box 179 - 550 Broadway • Eagle, Colorado 81631 Telephone: 328-7311 or 949-5257 or 927-3823 YELLOW COPY OF PERMIT MUST BE POSTED AT INSTALLATION SITE. PERMIT NO. 1068 Please call for final inspection before covering any portion of installed system. OWNER: Eric and Terry Brucker PHONE. 927-3223 MAILINGADDRESS: 0255 Little Pinon, Basalt, CO 81621 AGENT: PHONE: SYSTEMLOCATION: 0255 Little Pinon/Lot 13 Laura J Subdivision LICENSED INSTALLER: Eric Brucker LICENSE NO. 31-91 DESIGN ENGINEER OF SYSTEM: INSTALLATION IS HEREBY GRANTED FOR THE FOLLOWING: 1250 GALLON SEPTIC TANK OR GALLON AERATED TREATMENT UNIT. DISPERSAL AREA REQUIREMENTS: SQUARE FEET OF SEEPAGE BED 986 SQUARE FEET OF TRENCH BOTTOM. SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS: Place inspection portals at end of each line. 340 lineal ft of 10" SB2, 200 lineal ft. (32 units) infiltrator ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH OFFICER DATE: CONDITIONS: 1110, 1. ALL INSTALLATIONS MUST COMPLY WITH ALL RE OF THE EAGLE COUNTY INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM REGULATIONS, ADOPTED PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GRANTED IN 25-10-104, C.R.S. 1973, AS AMENDED. 2. THIS PERMIT IS VALID ONLY FOR CONNECTION TO STRUCTURES WHICH HAVE FULLY COMPLIED WITH COUNTY ZONING AND BUILDING REQUIREMENTS. CONNECTION TO OR USE WITH ANY DWELLING OR STRUCTURE NOT APPROVED BY THE ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENTS SHALL AUTOMATICALLY BE A VIOLATION OF A REQUIREMENT OF THE PERMIT AND CAUSE FOR BOTH LEGAL ACTION AND REVOCATION OF THE PERMIT. 3. SECTION Ill, 3.21 REQUIRES ANY PERSON WHO CONSTRUCTS, ALTERS OR INSTALLS AN INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM TO BE LICENSED ACCORDING TO THE REGULATIONS. FINAL APPROVAL OF SYSTEM: (TO BE COMPLETED BY INSPECTOR): NO SYSTEM SHALL BE DEEMED TO BE IN COML/ANCE WITH THE EAGLE COUNTY INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM REGULATIONS UNTIL THE SYSTEM IS APPROVED PRIOR TO COVERING ANY PORTION OF THE SYSTEM. Q % � INSTALLED ABSORPTION OR DISPERSAL AREA: 3 975 SQUARE FEET. 31 /�in._1'11,6 ars INSTALLED SEPTIC TANK: JQ GALLONS 3c;'` � DEGREES L FEET t 5.E. eonuw- Jcvs� SEPTIC TANK CLEANOUT TO WITHIN 8" OF FINAL GRADE, OR: PROPER MATERIALS AND ASSEMBLY YES NO COMPLIANCE WITH COUNTY/STATE REGULATION REQUIREMENTS: YES NO ANY ITEM CHECKED NO REQUIRES CORRECTION BEFORE FINAL APPROVAL A_PPROVA,L(OF SYS EM IS MADE. ARRANGE] A %RE -INSPECTION WHEN WORK IS COMPLETED. COMMENTS: Kl�f' dW 19t�1't jE�3� %PS��/3 �/7[' %/IS%/t// rf�^ �'/� '�� //J]%/ iy e✓ /s trC�/9TsrL�� ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH OFFICER: L DATE: ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH OFFICER: DATE: (RE -INSPECTION IF NECESSARY) RETAIN WITH RECEIPT RECORDS PERMIT APPLICANT/AGENT: OWNER: AMOUNT PAID: RECEIPT M: CHECK k: CASHIER: ISDS Permit # ( '_ I Date l ISDS Final Inspection Completeness Form Tank is �4 gal. Tank MaterialAID 1 a Tank is located %� ft. and degrees from (pezmanen landmark) � 1�'j Tank is located ft. and 1 degrees from ... (permanent landmark) Tank set level. Tank lids within 8" of finished grade. Size of field ft2 units lineal ft. Technology �1#4 Y4 `J Cleanout is installed in between tank and house(+ 1j100ft). There is a "T" that goes down 14 inches in the inlet and outlet of the tank. Inlet and outlet is sealed with tar tape, rubber gasket etc. Tank has two compartments with the larger compartment closest to the house. Measure distance and relative direction to field. Depth of field t . Soil interface raked. �. Inspection portals at the end of each trench. Proper distance to setbacks. _ Chambers properly installed as per manufacturers specifications. (Chambers latched, end plates properly installed, rocks removed from 2 trenches, etc-) Type of pipe used for building sewer line \ leach field F_ Other — --% Inspection meets requirements. Copy form to installer's file if recommendations for improvement were suggested. ACTION TAKEN: Setbacks Well Potable House Property Lake Dry Tank Drain Water Lines line Stream Gulch__ Field 100 25 20 10 50 25 10 10 Tank 50 10 5 10 50 10 * 10 C—AL'C'U',LA—TED BY DATE CHECKED BY DATE -: - 2*!-! �! n i'm Win 01-4--1': C:C!'PK%E TOLI SEE !-SDD-22.-V.' Application � G PERCOLATION TEST EAGLE COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPT. OWNER: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: �� f 13 7- MAILING ADDRESS : l TYPE OF DWELLING: &5 NUMBER OF BEDROOMS 6- TEST HOLES PRE-SOAKED: YES �J TTMP. M WLITFR nwvlpw I TKTr4Tjr,1 ^" "AT T 1 2 3 FF 2 3 -- - 1 - 2 3 1 2 - uv1L rcwrlLl 0' Rio L'iI qz jzq, zz ys I y� ��7 Z z� r�� 7 %y /�l �, > zv � -- 2' �s zz% 3, y 6 v ,�r lz Z �z �Y /,y% 7, �5 Z� ,27 �Ifl L3% Time to drop las inA , 36 , ZZ,s PERC RATE:. MINIMUM SEPTIC TANK SIZE: / Z U MINIMUM LEACH FIELD SIZE: :L-14_ COMMENTS: Z�tCGr C rl�' 3 Ala 2'ZU f,r� PERC TEST DONE BY: entai He rev. 6/90ks DATE: officer CTL/THOMPSON, INC. CONSULTING GEOTECHNICAL AND MATERIALS ENGINEERS SOILS AND FOUNDATION INVESTM01MON PROPOSED BRUCKER RES101tiNCE LOT 13, LAURA J. ESTATES 50 IVISION BASALT, COLORAD Eric Brucker 255 Little Pinion Basalt, CO 81621 Prepared For: Mr. Eric Brucker 0132 Park Avenue Basalt, Colorado 31621 Job f Jo. 17,?13 July 4, 1?O1 TABLE OF CONTENTS SCOPE I SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS I SITE CONDITIONS 2 PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION 2 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS 2 FOUNDATION 3 FLOOR SLABS & EXTERIOR CONCRETE FLATWORK 4 BASEMENT CONSTRUCTION 5 SURFACE DRAINAGE 6 LIMITATIONS 6 FIG. I - VICINIGY MAP & LOCATIONS OF EXPLORATOPY 0 1 GS Aw FIG. 2 - LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FIG. 3 - SWELL -CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS FIG. 4 - EXTERIOR FOUNDATION WALL DRAIN SCOPE This report presents the results of our soils and foundation investigation for the proposed Brucker Residence to be constructed on Lot 13, Laura J. Estates Subdivision in Basalt, Colorado. We explored the subsurface conditions at the site to provide foundation recommendations for the proposed residence. This report includes a description of the subsurface conditions found in our exploratory borings, recommended foundations and geotechnical criteria for details influenced by the subsoils. The report was prepared from data developed during our field exploration, laboratory testing, engineering analysis and our expere with similar conditions. A summary of our conclusions is presented belawi,, SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS I. Subsoils found in our exploratory borings consisted of 7 to 8.5 feet of silty and sandy clays overlying 4 and 2.5 feet of clays mixed with gravels underlain by gravelly, cobbly sand. The upper 5 feet of the sandy clays were porous and compressed when tested in the laboratory. 2. No free groundwater was encountered in our borings at the time of drilling. 3. The proposed residence should be founded with spread footings bearing on the clays mixed with gravels designed for a soil bearing pressure of 3,000 psf. If porous sandy clays are found beneath footings, they should be removed and the footings lowered to the clays mixed with gravels. 4. Slabs -on -grade can bear on natural soils. 5. Surface shaping should cause runoff of surface water away from the proposed residence. SITE CONDITIONS The Laura J. Estates Subdivision is located on the west facing hills that form the Roaring Fork Valley about 3/4 mile west of Basalt, Colorado. Single-family residential structures had been built on approximately one-half of the lots. Access was on the aggregate surfaced Big Pinion Road from Highway 82. Lot 13 consisted of a comparatively level area near Little Pinion. Drive and gentle to moderate grades from the north to the south usually estima at between S and IS percent. Vegetation included major pinion and cedcir" 4es and -40 „%ov native grasses, flowers and weeds. t PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION The proposed residence will be a two-story wood -frame structure with a walk -out basement to the south. The residence will have an attached garage in the northern portion. The floor elevation of the garage will be at 103.3. The lower level floor elevation will be at 97. Approximately 7 to 9 feet of excavation for the basement is anticipated. Based on our experience, the foundation loads are anticipated to vary from 1,000 to 3,000 pounds per lineal foot of foundation wall. A deck will be constructed to the west of the house. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Two exploratory borings were drilled with a 4-inch diameter continuous flight power auger at the locations shown on Fig. I to investigate subsurface conditions. Drilled vas directed by our personnel :vho logged the soils and obtained samples. Summary logs of the soils found in our borings, results of field penetration resistance tests, and a portion of iaborator-/ test data are presented on Fig. 2. The subsoils found in our borings consisted of 7 and 8.5 feet of silty and sandy clays overlying clays mixed with gravels underlain by gravelly, cobbly sands to the maximum depth explored of 14 and 13.5 feet. The presence of cobbles caused the drill rig refusal at depths of 13.5 and 14 feet. The upper 5 feet of sandy clays were porous. The porous sandy clays may compress significantly when wetted under footings. Laboratory test results indicated the sandy clay samples tested had liquid limits of 28 percent and plasticity indices of 5 to 6 percent and contained approximately 84 percent silt and clay size particles (passing the No. 200 sieve). A one-dimensional, swell -consolidation test was performed a sandy clay sample and test results are shown on Fig.3. No free groun'ater was encountered in our borings at the time of drilling: r` FOUNDATION Our investigations indicated the upper 5 feet of sandy clays were porous. The porous sandy clays will compress under footing loads when wetted. In our opinion, the residence should be founded with spread footings bearing on the clays mixed with gravels below the sandy porous clays. The porous sandy clays should be removed beneath footings and the footings lowered to the clays mixed with gravels. We recommend the following design and construction criteria for spread footings. I. Footings should bear on the clays mixed with gravels below the sandy porous clays. Material loosened during the excavation or forming process should be removed frorn footing areas prior to placing concrete. 2. Footings can be designed for a maximum soil bearing pressure of 3,000 psf. 3. Continuous foundation walls should be reinforced, top and bottom, to span loose soil pockets. We recommend provision of sufficient reinforcement to simply span and unsupported distance of 10 feet with at least two continuous No. 5 bars in the top and bottom of all foundation walls. 4. Minimum footings sizes are desirable. We suggest a minimum width of 16 inches for continuous footings and at least 2 feet by 2 feet for isolated column pads. Larger sizes may be required based on the structural loads. 5. The soils under exterior footings should be protected from freezing. The depth normally assumed for frost protection in the Basalt area is 36 inches. 6. The foundation excavation should be inspected by a representative of our firm to confirm subsurface conditions are as anticipated from our borings. R; FLOOR SLABS AND EXTERIOR CONCRE TE �FLATWORK Slabs -on -grade are anticipated in t. asement, garage, driveway and exterior walkway areas. Slabs -on -grade may bear on the natural soils. We recommend the following design and construction criteria for slob -on -grade r construction. I. Subgrades for supporting slabs -on -grade should be compacted prior to pouring the slabs. 2. Slabs should be separated from exterior walls and interior bearing members with a joint which allows free vertical movement of the slab. 3. Plumbing under the floor slab should be pressure tested. Plumbing and utilities which pass through the slabs should be isolated from the slab. 4. Foundation wall and trench backfill should be compacted to 90 percent of ASTM D 698 maximurn dry density. S. Frequent control joints should be provided. The American Concrete Institute (ACO recommends minimum joint spacing of 15 to 20 feet to control cracking. -4- 6. Exterior sidewalk and patio slabs should be reinforced to function as independent units. Movement of these slabs should not be transmitted directly to the foundation. BASEMENT CONSTRUCTION The basement foundation walls will be subjected to lateral earth pressures. These walls are restrained and cannot move, therefore, they should be designed for the "at rest" lateral earth pressure. Assuming the on -site soils are used as backfill, we recommend using an equivalent fluid density of 50 pcf to calculate lateral earth pressure. The above equivalent fluid density does not include allowance for sloping backfill, hydrostatic pressures, live loads and loads from footings of adjacent structures. Water from surface runoff or landscaping frequently flows through the 41 comparatively permeable backfill placed adjacent to the bas *nt foundation walls and collects on the surface of comparatively impermeable soils occurring at the bottom of the foundation excavations. This can cause wet or moist basement conditions after construction. To reduce the accumulation of water, we recommend provision of a foundation drain. The drain should consist of a 4-inch diameter open joint or slotted PVC pipe encased in free draining gravel. The drain should lead to a sump where water can be removed by pumping or to a positive gravity outlet. Typical foundation drain details are presented on Fig. 4. Backfill placed adjacent. to foundation walls should be compacted to at least 90 percent of standard Proctor maximum dry density (ASTM D 698). The upper 2 feet of backfill should consist of the more clayey soils found during excavation. This 2-foot layer is to provide a less permeable zone to reduce water infiltration. SURFACE DRAINAGE The performance of foundation and concrete flatwork is influenced by the moisture conditions within the subgrade soils. Overall surface shaping should be designed to cause rapid runoff of surface water away from the proposed residence. Planting or landscaping which requires excessive watering should not be within 10 feet of the residence. We recommend the following precautions be observed during construction and maintained at all times after the residence is completed. I. Excessive wetting or drying of the open foundation excavotr6n hould be avoided. t�r 2. Water should not be allowed to pond adjacent * he residence. Landscaping or planting which requires excessive watering should not be constructed within 10 feet of the residence. 3. Backfill adjacent to the foundation walls should be moistened and compacted. 4. The top 2 feet of wall backfill should consist of the most clayey soils found at the site to reduce infiltration of surface water to the foundation and basement levels. 5. Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill. Splash block and extensions should be provided at all downspout and discharge points. LIMITATIONS Our borings were spaced to obtain a reasonably accurate picture of foundation soil conditions. Variations in the subsurface conditions not indicated by our borings are always possible. %Ale should inspect the completed foundation excavation. This investigation was conducted in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by the members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions in the locality of this project.; o other warranty, express or implied, is made. If we can be of f e:r' service in discussing the contents of this report or in the analy s 'orthe proposed construction from a geotechnical point of view, please call. CTL/THOMPSON, INC. Nan -Ping Hsieh, P. E. Senior Geotechnical Engineer Reviewed by: Frank J. Holliday, P. E. Principal Engineer NPH:FJH:dd (3 copies sent) Received Apr-13-99 10:40am from CCITT G3 - ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH page 1 1 1 . 14 J. Received Apr-13-99 10:40am IE x; 1 _ from CCITT G3 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTextended page 1.2 k Lt F< , ' S i.. rIY i �r '^ate t sl, 1 i.j G� to iw' t^ut u }J„ h t ( 4 Y. I m N'\ 41 o 17 abed HIIVIH IVINIVINOU I AN3 (-- SO 11100 w0JJ MZC:@L 66-Cf-JdV PaAIG09U Z. la I -:;l abed a .. �; ' � �"Y4 it "' /' to zzp F4. HIIV3H ]VIN3NNOWAN3 CO 11100 wOAI WeZS:O� 66-CL-JdV POA1909H ,i � r } S ' we'.. r�. p........ 1 ' 9 abed H1Ib3H IVIN3nNOUTAN3 CO 11100 woa} WeZe:Ol 66-Et-Jdy panlaaaU Lt� 1 ' 1 `.Awl i ro �ti ,6. � '� ���.+ •any' ! i,nya54"� .7"• t € abed HI�V3H Ib1N31NNOU i AN3 <- €0 11133 wOA I Wez€:Ol 66-€R-Jdy penfOOOH Received Apr-13-99 10:32am from CCITT G3 --) ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH page 1 Fax over Sheet Eric Brucker Date: 85-5 Frying Pan Rd. Basait Co s1621 1 IFA�& 0. Fron), �J�ZAA-CA j Pages Sent including this cover sheet---!�--- If this transmiss-o" is not cOmplete, please call (970) 927-9249 Fax # (970) 927-8324 Notes: a-)- 7/4/, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT (303) 328.8730 EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO September 12, 1991 Eric and Terry Brucker 0255 Little Pinon Basalt, CO 81621 RE: Final of ISDS Permit No. 1068 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Brucker: 300 BROADWAY P.O. BOX 179 EAGLE. COLORADO 31631 FAX (303) 3323-7207 This letter is to inform you that the above referenced ISDS Permit has been inspected and finalized. Enclosed is a copy to retain for your records. Also enclosed are informational sheets regarding the care of your septic system. If you have any questions regarding this permit, please contact the Eagle County Environmental Health Division, P.O. Box 179, Eagle, Colorado 81631. We can also be reached, depending on your calling area, at the following numbers: Eagle Valley 328-8730; Basalt/El Jebel 927-3823. Sincerely, C. Kelley Carhart Office Assistant ckc Encl: Informational Sheets Final ISDS Permit cc: Chrono File ISDS File Building Permit File 1068-91 aye r Da 3 6lol 1856-99 Tax#2465-023-01-011 ,JOB NAY 1Cc-f /3 kA,1,� /,6?5-&v Lot # 13 Laura J Est. BRUCKER 6 qS,s�� tP� � 6A,1 0255 Little Pinon Drive JVO bV VM,.V,� BILL TO DATE T{ARTED DATE COMPLETED DATE BILLED -- S f JOB COST SUMMARY TOTAL SELLING PRICE TOTAL MATERIAL // J4� TOTAL LABOR 7 INSURANCE SALES TAX MISC. COSTS TOTAL JOB COST GROSS PROFIT LESS OVERHEAD COSTS % OF SELLING PRICE NET PROFIT JOB FOLDER Product 278 ®® NEW ENGLAND BUSINESS SERVICE, INC., GROTON, MA 01471 JOB FOLDER Printed in U.S.A i/4�v' *00 g-,r,5 Z,,/i 1'qw7 EAGLE C NTY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMf "'AL HEALTH MIT MUST BE POSTED ON LOCATION Box 811 6th & Broadway PLEASE CALL FOR FINAL INSPECTION Eagle, Colorado 81631 PERMIT NO 412 (this does not constitute • a building or use permit) Owner KENDALL/SANDRA HAWKINS System Location LAURA J ESTATES: LOT 1 Licensed fkmb=mx�✓t-�' - ,a /"� �' 1,250 * Conditional Construction approval is hereby granted for alX000 gallon xx Septic Tank or Aerated treatment unit. MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS: Absorption area (or dispersal area) computed as follows: 1,250 gallon septic tank 1,000 1,000 sq. ft. leach field Pere rate 1 inches in 16 minutes �$�� sq. ft. absorption area per bedroom 333 sq. ft. # of bedrooms 3 X 333 sq. ft. minimum requirement May we suggest Date October 30, 1979 Inspector Erik W. Edeen FINAL APPROVAL OF SYSTEM: No system shall be deemed to be in compliance with the Sewage Disposal Laws until the assembled system is approved prior to covering any part. Septic Tank cleanout to within 12" of final grade or aerated access ports above grade. Proper materials and assembly. Adequate absorption (or dispersal) area. Adequate compliance with permit requirements. AdWwck Adequate compliance with County and State regulations/requirements. .:� Date141- Inspector RETAIN WITH RECEIPT RECORDS AT CONSTRUCTION SITE *CONDITIONS: 1. All installation must comply with all requirements of the County Individual Sewage Disposal Regulations, adopted pursuant to authority granted in 25-10-104, CRS 1973 amended 25-1-614, CRS 1973 2. This permit is valid only for connection to structures which have fully complied with County Zoning and building requirements. Connection to or use with any dwelling or structures not approved by the building and Zoning office shall automatically be a violation of a requirement of the permit and cause for both legal action and revocation of the permit. 3. Section III, 3.24 requires any person who constructs, alters, or installs an individual sewage disposal system in a manner which involves a knowing and material variation from the terms or specifications con- tained in the application of permit commits a Class I, Petty Offense ($500.00 fine - 6 months in jail or both. EAGLE COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH ROUTE FORM /,0 _ AO _7!? NA14E 7/.$ DATE REFERRED APPLICATION NO. 0 A LOCATION Please review -the attached application and return it and this completed form to the Environmental Health Office. PLANNING Complies with: Yes No Subdivision Regulations Zoning Regulations Recommend Approval LI Comments: &e aiNGL E7 hem/, y ovcY —BUILDING �''�' Set Backs Site Access Other Recommend Approval Comments: . (aet 44Aa&r_S- ) W ✓ 94111-T1l Dx.-Liv_age Recommend Approval Comments : ,Q�La/1/yEi1ro,pw S/z'zE r 4w,e= 0Z 2, , 7 - 0 Reviewed By Date r-I M a00 Q; Q HOa, a Lr) a Hc0G ri7i C-) Z pq C. H a w w W W w H Hc O O O H Lr) P Q)- 0 Ga w h CIS Z is M C M H H c H P H 7 Pa a O w U; O U) w G-1 w O x a Q CTJ a� U v P! 4-4 .r.j U H H w w En P-, U z v H P� Uj p p � MoR m � � s U HJ .r{ � H iy 1t 0 -0 - ,- 0 4-J '>, H Olit 3 o a v U 4J H H U •rr'I N H � U4-4 x •r I 3 v w r~ �_ .. cn ^ 0 G P- H H E-H o O [z F� O �4 O H U z O � •r-I " w p v w PL4 F+ U H U H H H a� 41 U MM O r-I U1 cti � N O •ri Q n � � X 4 .. a) r4 •r4 M H V] U] �4 a ri H 0 U ^ � cd Q) � p W O m P-, U 4! cd C �•' `y ra-1 U •ra c: rA O bt Q) O .r4 o C) r--I p N O G p Z X W H U) W p H H U) U U) �I F U] r-I O O � U E-I U) N N a Pa .J � 44 4 co O O •r1 0 �4 �4 0 v N N /1 •ri •H r fl II x P •. r-j O a. r P? v Ur N a: C �+ cn ccn !� O W iy 1- 4-) U; m 0 a O n cCS r- I N P 4 ae a 00 bO r° Cl: O r-I Ui ,-j d C 4-J C H +J Cs O P-+ ? 3 x w 3 Ev-'I u CO m 4-J •� w P`i r-I a U N H 3 �4 "r O P •• U) W .H am• H C7 O 4� rO Z �4 N W O O 'o p PH cd � X Q) H PQ p H 4J •r-I H H O U O H CCd' Z P- w �CI)` n P- o K N H `-' P� C: H � W C pq U, H (3) rn p N. m N p r--I .O �4 r-'I O d-J -Hac O H ^ r-a r4 0 CO •ri •r1 U r1 r-'I •rl U U N U U x N N U P�. P.': U d-J r-I N •rl r-I O a-J •r-I H � H r4 r-i O PI. tk1 •rl Cd 0 d-J N -W O 0 �4 Cd a:•r1 a) pU191- a) O r4 .0 Q;UHO U O r--I N M ,< H O O O ;: O H r-I ,; IQ •rr4-I •rr4-I •rr-'I i< W Vic�--, H U 94' � $:1 U P, w .H •ri •ri ;: P, C O C/) N is H H H a)41 P a a. c w a In co w H W v (3) w ri r4 0 n w W C: Hi IY' rmi H ` H C O H H l ' H O W U] T y„ H U x Z H W P Iq� H o w H H r Y- r rTI c U H vi ;c a F1 OU a; H PL- U Z H O H O PO-� P-; W x W Pa ., 5-11 , _ uJ Ln:3— C= W n Chi � rl rl r I ct Wd -H CA w 0 w w> 00m00 M M M N N N W w w r--I Lr) (IQ M N 00 r` U-) M C--Csr` N -tN M Cr (01� Sol A FOUNDAW", as S. ZUNI DELIVER, COLORADO CO223 E H 0 1 w E E v I H 0 SOIL AND FOUNDATION INVESTIGATION FOR A PROPOSED RESIDENCE, LOT 1, LAURA J ESTATES, EAGLE COUNTY,�COLORADO. 3031744-7105 Prepared For: Sandy Hawkins P.O. Box 433 Aspen, Colorado 3101 Job No. 19,160 September 20, 1979 TABLE OF CONTENTS CONCLUSIONS SCOPE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION SITE CONDITIONS SUBSOIL CONDITIONS FOUNDATION RECUHMENDAT|ONS FLOOR SLABS PERCOLATION TEST SURFACE DRAINAGE WATER SOLUBLE SULFATE MISCELLANEOUS F|&° 1 ~ LOCATION OF TEST PITS FIG. Z - LOGS OF TEST PITS FIG. ] - 5WGLL~CULSOL|DAT|0N TEST RESULTS TABLE l ~ PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS TABLE 2 - SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS l 2 2 ] 4 6 5 5 SCOPE CONCLUSIONS The proposed building should be founded Witt) spread footings placed on t-he natural solls designed for a maximurn soil bearing pressure of 4,000 psf. Other soil -related design details and precautions ire given in the text of the report. This report presents results of a soil and foundation investigation for the proposed residence to be located at Lot 1, Laura "J" Estates, Eagle County, Colorado. We previously conducted a preliminary subsoil and geological Investigation for this development, reported under our Job No. !4,234, dated March 23, 1977. The report presents the recommended type foundation, allowable soil pressures, ground water conditions, average percolation rates, and other soil -related design and construction details. PROPOS)ED CONSTRUCT !ON We understand that the proposed residence will be a one-story Wood frame structure with a crawl -space. Loads for this structure are expected to be typical and of a light magnitude. If loading or design conditions are significantly different from those described above, we should be notiflod to re-evaluate the recommenda- tions contained In this report. SITE CONDITIONS At the time of our Investigation. the site was vacant and covered with various types of weeds and grasses on the level portion. The Robinson Ditch Is located on the south portion of the lot, and Is surrounded by various decidious and evergreen trees. The site is generally flat in -2- the north portion and slopes down to the Robinson Ditch in the south third of the site. Maximum elevation difference across the proposed building site is on the order of 5 feet, with maximum elevation difference across the entire lot on the order of approximately 40 feet, SUBSOIL CONDITIONS The subsoil conditions at the site were investigated by excavating two test pits at -locations shown on Fig. 1. The subsoil profile, as determined by our test pits, consist of a mantle of topsoil overlying stiff sandy clays to the depths investigated. Occasional baslat cobbles were encountered. The back hoe met refusal at depths 6 to 7 feet In the stiff clay containing gypsum and cobbles. A typical sample of the clay material was subjected to swell -consolidation testing, with results presented on Fig. 3. Testing Indicated the clay to have a slight swell Potential when loaded and wetted. In addition to the two test pits,. three precolation pits were excavated at locations noted on Fig, 1. No free water was encountered In the test pits at the time of our Investigation. z FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the results of our investigation, we believe the most desirable type foundation for the proposed residence would be spread footings. The following design and construction details should be observed: (1) Footings placed on the upper natural sandy clays should be designed for a maximum soil pressure of 4,000 psf.. Under this pressure, we M estimate total settlement will be on tile order of !-inch, and maximum differential settlement across the proposed building will be less than 3/h-Inch. (2) 'Continuous foundation walls should be well reinforced top and bottom to span an unsupported length of at least 10 feet. (3) Local soft or very loose pockets of soil encountered in the footing excavations should be removed, and the footings extended to the lower firm soils. (4) Exterior footings should be provided with adequzite soil cover above their bearling elevation for frost protection. FLOOR SLABS The soils at the site possess slight swell potential and there will be a risk that slabs placed on grade will heave and crack. We understand the living area will be a structured floor system. If any slabs are placed on grade, the following den its should.be observed: (1) All slabs should be sep ;rt ed from the bearing walls and columns vilUi a positiv,_- oxparision joint :o achicve a floa-zing flair;` :r'Iab effect. (2) All Interior slab bearing partition walls should be provided with slip joints at the botton, so that in case of floor movement, the upper structure will not be affected. This detail should also apply to door fraroes, sheatrock, and wall paneling. Slabs should be provided with control joints to minimize damage due to shrinkage cracking. All concrete slabs should be reinforced. (4) A 4-Inch free draining gravel layer should be provided beneath the slabs to distribute floor load. (5) If below grade floor levels are planned, they should have a peripheril drain at footing level leading to a sump or a positive gravity outfall. The drain pipe should be below floor level and surrounded by clean free draining gravel that connects to the gravel below the floor. The above precautions will not prevent slab movement should the underlying soils become wetted, but will minimize the damage if such movement occurs, PERCOLATION TEST Percolation tests were conducted using three pits at locations shown on Fig. 1. These pits were excavated to an approximate depth of 42 Inches using a back hoe with 12-inch square pits excavated by hand at the bottom. Soils encountered In the percolation pits were similar to those In the test pit consisting of a mantle of topsoil overlying silty sandy clays. After saturating the percolation test pits for the required 24 hours, the percolation tests were performed in accordance with the requirements of the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. The results are presented In Table 1. SURFACE DRAINAGE The following drainage precautions should be observed during construc- tion and maintained at all times after the -building has been completed: M' Excessive wetting or drying of the foundation excavation should be avoided during construction. (2) Backfill around the building should be moistened and compacted to at least 90% standard Proctor density. (3) The ground surface.surroundlnq the exterior of the building should be sloped to drain away from the building In all directions. (4) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill. WATER SOLUBLE SULFATE Free gypsum was noted in the soils. This conditions is usually related to a high water soluble sulfate content. Therefore, we recommend a Type V or a rich mix, of Type 11, low C 3 A, cement be used in concrete exposed to the soils. P! I SCELLANEOUS This report has been prepared in accordance with generally accepted soil and foundation engineering practices In this area for the use of the client for design purposes. The conclusions and recommendations subm,itted In this report are based upon the data obtained from the test pits excavated at the locations indicated on the test pit plan. The nature and extent of variations between the test pits may not become evident until excavation is performed. If, during construction, soil and ground water conditions appear to be different from those described herein, this office should be advised at once so that re-evaluation of i the recommendations may be made. We recommendon-site inspection of aX=at|onu and foundation bearing strata by a soil engineer. CHEN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. STE awed. RS8/kYd Enoloaurs m 3enchlvfark - 0 N 1'elephone Box; assumed E1=1001 Property Line Pere. Building Pit 3 � F"I '71 Profile Pit 1 Pere® Pit I Pere. Pit 2 lv,s`` s?, No Scale LOCATION OF TEST PITS Fig. 1 Perc. Perc. Perc. Profile Profile Pit #1 Pit 02 Pit #3 Pit #1 Pit 02 EL=1061 EL=1041 EL=105' EL=1101 EL=107' 110 110 7X7 WC=11.3 DD=1-10.4 1.05 -1 1HC- 13 2 7 7 o' QW 105 0 z W DD=107--/ 2 -200=83 709464 ?�- LL=35 PI=15 wC=-- 18. 0 100 -200=73 LL=35 PI=12 LEGEND: NOTES: Topsoil. (1) Test pits were excavated on August 23, 1979 with a backhoe. (2) Elevations are approximate and ay(CL), sandy, silty, refer to the Bench Mark shown on 121 occasional 11 gravel, and cobbles. Figure A. Very stiff, mist, brown, contains m 9ypsui * (3) No free water was encountered in Undisturbed drive sample. the test pits at the time of our. investigation, (4 ) !-iC Watcr Ccntent Refusal to backhoea DD = Dry Density (pcf); -200 = Percent Passing No. 200 Sieve; LL - Liquid Limit M; PI'- Plasticity Index 99,160 LOGS OF TEST PITS 1ig. 2 ka t-1 L. Pj ;� I � L) -.) � �; %, I -A , ".0 0 3 Natural Dry Unit Weight = 110.4 pcf Natural Moisture Content 1 1� 3 percent "Xplintj M, )n -C -imcer w�'t =cngEant t illp, pr2s 3—U T- sampl>_ of C1 ly" T,-a;-- -U-L- slightly S -C 7 1 r -Tf'. s f s F- Pit 12"! at 3 ---oJu I 0. 1 1.0 10 APPLIED PRESSURE ksf M 1�0 ConsolidetJon Test F i o, - suit ilULE BOLE LENGTH OF NO. DEPTH I tITERVAL (In.} {lain.) 1 641, 10 1, li i7 tI 2 567, 10 „ tt ,r It H 11 17 tt . I, ,r 3 561, 10 ,t It tt 11 ti a 1t 1t !t tf TABLE PERCOLA,ri i TEST RESULTS Job No. 19,160 WATIER DEPTH - WATER DEPTH AT START . A'f END DROP IN AVERAGE OF INTERVAL OF INTERVAL WATER LEVEL PERCOLATION PAIC (Inches) (Inches) (Inches) (Mirl.jIncf,.) 54 3/4 55 1/2 3/4 55 1/2 55 3/4 1/4 55 3/4 56 1/4 56 56 1/[,. 1/4 - 52 1/2 p 52 1/2 53 1/2 53 53 1/4 53 1/4. 53 3/4 24 mind/inch 43 3/4 ` 49 1/4 49 49 1/4 1/4 49 1/4 49 1/2 1/4 49 1/2 50 1/2 A_ 44 .p 44. 44 3/4 3/4, 44 3/4 45 1/4 1]2 45 1/2 46 3/4 15 min./:inch 49 1/2 50 1/2 J0 50 1/2 1/2 50 1/2 51 1/4 3/4 51 1/4 52 3/4 _a 44 44 45 1/4 1 1/4 45 1/4 46 1/4 1 46 1/4 47 - 3/4 10 min./inch. I@ II to jV, -Ili f --q 41 4-j nz� co ce w C71 P4 ri co. ui cc < LU L.L LJ IL- ca Ll. ........... ..... V; < — iij C, LU U-LL z U co 6 S u < 'M (Z D -4 uj W cl) w M I r. cli cli Cv Llj— —!Lj— L —L—u } ui paleool st al!! ,-- /'/ Iaa-1 01 = t enaalu E inoluo; /p2tAq zz it 101 -f \ -MM-1 NN J 7.: �-1 / - J ..--__ ` �^ -/�__ Aso � \ � � �"�• ✓'._ /""-' _..-�''�-��-` / r---r .`py�" J-,"J� �--- ---_._ = --�. '�� ��,`' �1 I!d I j 01) LL. f Kj- _ C ;.-f- F- Q D. ZoFn 1 w Q °� c) U.-3:F-x . LLJ LIJ 2 F-•- < Z OD 6�L OLjm LmD J < < (n M LLI E