Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
HomeMy WebLinkAboutC21-356 Opioid Settlement MOUCOLORADOOPIOIDSSETTLEMENTMEMORANDUMOFUNDERSTANDING(“MOU”)Thursday,August26,2021August25,2021AttorneyGeneralversionA.DefinitionsAsusedinthisMOU:1.“ApprovedPurpose(s)”shallmeanforward-lookingstrategies,programming,andservicestoabatetheopioidepidemicasidentifiedbythetermsofanySettlement.IfaSettlementissilentonApprovedPurpose(s),thenApprovedPurpose(s)shallmeanthoseforward-lookingstrategiestoabatetheopioidepidemicidentifiedinExhibitAoranysupplementalforward-lookingabatementstrategiesaddedtoExhibitAbytheAbatementCouncil.ConsistentwiththetermsofanySettlement,“ApprovedPurposes”shallalsoincludethereasonableadministrativecostsassociatedwithoverseeingandadministeringOpioidFundsfromeachofthefour(4)SharesdescribedinSection(B)(2).ReimbursementbytheStateorLocalGovernmentsforpastexpensesarenotApprovedPurpose(s).“ApprovedPurposes”shallincludeattorneys’feesandexpensesincurredinthecourseoftheopioidlitigationthatarepaidthroughtheprocessdiscussedbelow.2.“CountyArea”shallmeanacountyintheStateofColoradoplustheLocalGovernments,orportionofanyLocalGovernment,withinthatcounty.3.“EffectiveDate”shallmeanthedateonwhichacourtofcompetentjurisdiction,includinganybankruptcycourt,entersthefirstSettlementbyorderorconsentdecree.ThePartiesanticipatethatmorethanoneSettlementwillbeadministeredaccordingtothetermsofthisMOU,butthatthefirstenteredSettlementwilltriggerthefonnationoftheAbatementCouncilinSection(C)andtheRegionalCouncilsinSection(F)(5))4.“GeneralAbatementFundCouncil,”or“AbatementCouncil,”shallhavethemeaningdescribedinSection(C),below.Fortheavoidanceofdoubt,theMcKinseySettlementandanyotherSettlementthatprecedesthefinalizationofdraftingthisMOUarenotconsideredatriggerforpurposesofthecalculationof“EffectiveDate.”1DocuSign Envelope ID: A97F0DF8-5247-480F-B55A-658D8BCBC744
5.“LocalGovernment(s)”shallmeanallcountiesintheStateofColoradoandthemunicipalities,towns,andcountyandcitymunicipalcorporationsthatarclistedinExhibitB.6.“NationalOpioidSettlementAdministrativeFund”shallmeananyfundidentifiedbyaSettlementforthenationaldistributionofOpioidFunds.7.“OpioidFunds”shallmeandamageawardsobtainedthroughaSettlement.8.“OpioidSettlingDefendant”shallmeananypersonorentity,oritsaffiliates,thatengagesinorhasengagedinthemanufacture,marketing,promotion,distribution,ordispensingoflicitopioids.9.“ParticipatingLocalGovernment(s)”shallmeanallLocalGovernmentsthatsignthisMOU,andifrequiredundertermsofaparticularSettlement,whohaveexecutedareleaseofclaimswiththeOpioidSettlementDefendant(s).Fortheavoidanceofdoubt,aLocalGovernmentmustsignthisMOUtobecomea“ParticipatingLocalGovernment.”LocalGovernmentsmaydesignatetheappropriateindividualfromtheirentitytosigntheMOU.10.“Party”or“Parties”shallmeantheStateand/orParticipatingLocalGovernment(s).II.“QualifiedSettlementFundAccount,”or“QSFAccount,”shallmeananaccountsetupasaqualifiedsettlementfund,468bfund,asauthorizedbyTreasuryRegulationsl.468B-1(c)(26CFR§l.468B-l).12.“RegionalCouncil”shallhavethemeaningdescribedinSection(F)(5),below.13.“Settlement”shallmeanthenegotiatedresolutionoflegalorequitableclaimsagainstanOpioidSettlingDefendantwhenthatresolutionhasbeenjointlyenteredintobytheStateandtheParticipatingLocalGovernments,orbyanyindividualPartyorcollectionofPartiesthatopttosubjecttheirSettlementtothisMOU.UnlessotherwisedirectedbyanorderfromaUnitedStatesBankruptcyCourt,“Settlement”shallalsoincludedistributionsfromanyliquidationunderChapter7oftheUnitedStatesBankruptcyCodeorconfirmedplanunderChapter11oftheUnitedStatesBankruptcyCodethattreatstheclaimsoftheStateandLocalGovernmentsagainstanOpioidSettlingDefendant.14.“TheState”shallmeantheStateofColoradoactingthroughitsAttorneyGeneralandtheColoradoDepartmentofLaw.B.AllocationofSettlementProceeds1.AllOpioidFundsshallbeheldinaccordancewiththetermsofanySettlement.IfaSettlementallowsOpioidFundstobeheldinaNationalOpioidSettlementAdministrativeFund,thenOpioidFundsshallbeheldinsuchNationalOpioidSettlementAdministrativeFund.IfaSettlementdoesnotallowforOpioidFunds2DocuSign Envelope ID: A97F0DF8-5247-480F-B55A-658D8BCBC744
tobeheldinaNationalOpioidSettlementAdministrativeFund,OpioidFundsshallbeheldinaColorado-specificQSFAccountor,underthefollowinglimitedcircumstances,intheState’sCustodialAccount:1)ifatthetimeofaSettlement,aColorado-specificQSFAccountisnotyetestablished,althoughinsuchcase,theOpioidFundsshallbetransferredtotheColorado-specificQSFAccountonceitisestablishedor2)wheretheAbatementFundCouncildetenTlinesOpioidsFundscannotbelegallyheldinaColorado-specificQSFAccount.RegardlessofwhetherOpioidFundsareheldinaNationalAdministrativeFund,aColorado-specificQSFAccount,orintheState’sCustodialAccount,theAbatementCouncilshallappointoneofitsmemberstoserveasthepointofcontactinaccordanceSection(C)(4)(b)(i),below.2.AllOpioidFunds,atthetimeofaSettlementoratthetimedesignatedintheSettlementdocuments,shallbedividedanddistributedasfollows:2a.10%directlytotheState(“StateShare”)forApprovedPurposesinaccordancewithSection(D),below;b.20%directlytoParticipatingLocalGovernments(“LGShare”)forApprovedPurposesinaccordancewithSection(E),below;c.60%directlytoRegions(“RegionalShare”)forApprovedPurposesinaccordancewithSection(F),below;andd.10%tospecificabatementinfrastructureprojects(“StatewideInfrastructureShare”)forApprovedPurposesinaccordancewithSection(G),below.3.DistributionoftheSharesinSectionB(2)(a)—(d)shallbedirect,meaningthatfundsheldinaccordancewithSectionB(l)shallbedisburseddirectlytotheState,ParticipatingLocalGovernments,Regions,andtheStatewideInfrastructureShareaccordingtothetermsofthisMOU.4.AllOpioidFunds,regardlessofallocation,shallbeusedforApprovedPurposes.5.ParticipatingLocalGovernmentsmayelecttoshare,pool,orcollaboratewiththeirrespectiveallocationoftheLGorRegionalSharesinanymannertheychoose,solongassuchsharing,pooling,orcollaborationisusedforApprovedPurposesandcomplieswiththetenTisofthisMOUandanySettlement.C.GeneralAbatementFundCouncilAGeneralAbatementFundCouncil(the“AbatementCouncil”),consistingofrepresentativesappointedbytheStateandParticipatingLocalGovernments,shall2ThisMOUtreatsmulti-countyhealthdepartmentsascountyhealthdepartmentsforpurposesofallocationanddistributionofabatementproceedsandthereforemulti-countyhealthdepartmentsshallnotreceiveanyOpioidFundsdirectly.Third-PartyPayors(“TPPs”)arenotPartiestothisMOU.3DocuSign Envelope ID: A97F0DF8-5247-480F-B55A-658D8BCBC744
bccreatedtoensurethedistributionofOpioidFundscomplieswiththetermsofanySettlementandtoprovideoversightoftheOpioidFundsinaccordancewiththetermsofthisMOU.2.Membership:TheAbatementCouncilshallconsistofthefollowingthirteen(13)members,whoshallserveintheirofficialcapacityonly.a.StateMembers:Seven(7)membersshallbeappointedbytheState,asauthorizedvolunteersoftheState,asfollows:(i)AChairtoserveasanon-votingmember,exceptintheeventofatie;(ii)Two(2)memberswhoarelicensedprofessionalswithsignificantexperienceinsubstanceusedisorders;(iii)Three(3)memberswhoareprofessionalswithsignificantexperienceinprevention,education,recovery,treatment,criminaljustice,ruralpublichealthissues,orgovernmentadministrationrelatedtosubstanceusedisorders;and(iv)One(1)memberorfamilymemberaffecteddirectlybytheopioidcrisis.b.LocalGovernmentMembers:Six(6)membersshallbeappointedbytheParticipatingLocalGovernments.LocalGovernmentMembersshallbeaCountyCommissioner,Mayor,CityorTownCouncilMember,oraprofessionalwithsignificantexperienceinprevention,education,recovery,treatment,criminaljustice,ruralpublichealthissues,orgovernmentaladministrationrelatedtosubstanceusedisorders.AParticipatingLocalGovernmentmaydeterminewhichLocalGovernmentMembersareeligible(orineligible)toserveontheGeneralAbatementFundCouncil.CountyCommissioners,CityorTownCouncilMembers,and/orMayorsfromtheRegionsidentifiedinExhibitCshallcollaboratetoappointLocalGovernmentMembersasfollows:(i)Two(2)MembersfromRegions1,5,13,14,15,17,18;(ii)Two(2)MembersfromRegions2,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,16;and(iii)Two(2)MembersfromRegions3,4,19.c.Terms:TheAbatementCouncilshallbeestablishedwithinninety(90)daysoftheEffectiveDate.Inordertodoso,withinsixty(60)daysoftheEffectiveDate,theStateshallappointtheStateMembersinaccordancewithSection(C)(2)(a),andafterconferralwiththeLocalGovernments,CCIandCMLshalljointlyappointsix(6)LocalGovernmentMembersforaninitialtermnottoexceedoneyear.Thereafter,Membersshallbe4DocuSign Envelope ID: A97F0DF8-5247-480F-B55A-658D8BCBC744
appointcdinaccordancewiththisSectionandSections(C)(2)(a)and(b)andmayservenomorethantwo(2)consecutivetwo-yearterms,foratotaloffour(4)consecutiveyears.Exceptthat,beginninginthesecondyearonly,two(2)StateMembersandtwo(2)LocalGovernmentmembersshallbeappointedforathree-yeartermandmayserveoneconsecutivetwo-yeartermthereafter.TheChairshallhavenotermbutmaybereplacedattheState’sdiscretion.(i)IfaStateorLocalGovernmentMemberresignsorisotherwiseremovedfromtheAbatementCouncilpriortotheexpirationoftheirterm,areplacementMembershallbeappointedwithinsixty(60)daysinaccordancewithSections(C)(2)(a)and(b).(ii)IfaLocalGovernmentMembervacancyexistsformorethansixty(60)days,theStateshallappointareplacementLocalGovernmentMembertoserveuntilthevacancyisfilledinaccordancewithSection(C)(2)(b).3.Duties:TheAbatementCouncilisprimarilyresponsibleforensuringthatthedistributionofOpioidFundscomplieswiththetermsofthisMOU.TheAbatementCouncilisalsoresponsibleforoversightofOpioidFundsfromtheRegionalShareinaccordancewithSection(F),below,andfordevelopingprocessesandproceduresforthedistributionandoversightofOpioidFundsfromtheStatewideInfrastructureShareinaccordancewithSection(G)below.4.Governance:TheAbatementCouncilshalldraftitsownbylawsorothergoverningdocuments,whichmustincludeappropriateconflictofinterestanddisputeresolutionprovisions,inaccordancewiththetermsofthisMOUandthefollowingprinciples:a.Authority:TheAbatementCouncildoesnothaverulemakingauthority.ThetermsofthisMOUandanySettlement,asenteredbyanycourtofcompetentjurisdiction,includinganybankruptcycourt,controltheauthorityoftheAbatementCouncilandtheAbatementCouncilshallnotstrayoutsidetheboundsoftheauthorityandpowervestedbythisMOUandanySettlement.b.Administration:TheAbatementCouncilshallberesponsibleforanaccountingofallOpioidFunds.TheAbatementCouncilshallberesponsibleforreleasingOpioidFundsinaccordancewithSection(B)(l)fortheRegionalandStatewideInfrastructureSharesinSections(B)(2)(c)and(d)andshalldeveloppoliciesandproceduresforthereleaseandoversightofsuchfundsinaccordancewithSections(F)and(G).ShouldtheAbatementCouncilrequireassistancewithprovidinganaccountingofOpioidFunds,itmayseekassistancefromtheState.5DocuSign Envelope ID: A97F0DF8-5247-480F-B55A-658D8BCBC744
(i)TheAbatementCouncilshallappointoneofitsmemberstoserveasapointofcontactforthepurposeofcommunicatingwiththeentityholdingOpioidFundsinaccordancewithSection(B)(l)andinthatroleshallonlyactasdirectedbytheAbatementCouncil.c.Transparency:TheAbatementCouncilshalloperatewithallreasonabletransparencyandoperateinamannerconsistentwithallColoradolawsrelatingtoopenrecordsandmeetingsregardlessofwhethertheAbatementCouncilisotherwiseobligatedtocomplywiththem.(i)TheAbatementCouncilshalldevelopacentralizedpublicdashboardorotherrepositoryforthepublicationofexpendituredatafromanyPartyorRegionalCouncilthatreceivesOpioidFundsinaccordancewithSections(D)-(G).(ii)TheAbatementCouncilmayalsorequireoutcomerelateddatafromanyPartyorRegionalCouncilthatreceivesOpioidFundsinaccordancewithSections(D)-(G)andmaypublishsuchoutcomerelateddatainthecentralizedpublicdashboardorotherrepositorydescribedabove.Indetenniningwhichoutcomerelateddatamayberequired,theAbatementCouncilshallworkwithallPartiesandRegionalCouncilstoidentifyappropriatedatasetsanddevelopreasonableproceduresforcollectingsuchdatasetssothattheadministrativeburdendoesnotoutweighthebenefitofproducingsuchoutcomerelateddata.(iii)Forpurposesoffundingthecentralizedpublicdashboardorotherrepositorydescribedabove,theAbatementCouncilshallmakegoodfaitheffortstoseekfundingfromoutsidesourcesfirst,otherwisetheStateshallprovidesuchfunding.d.Collaboration:TheAbatementCouncilshallfacilitatecollaborationbetweentheState,ParticipatingLocalGovernments,RegionalCouncils,andotherstakeholdersforthepurposesofsharingdata,outcomes,strategies,andotherrelevantinformationrelatedtoabatingtheopioidcrisisinColorado.e.DecisionMaking:TheAbatementCouncilshallseektomakealldecisionsbyconsensus.Intheeventconsensuscannotbeachieved,unlessotherwiserequiredinthisMOU,theAbatementCouncilshallmakedecisionsbyamajorityvoteofitsMembers.TheChairshallonlyvoteintheeventofatie.f.DueProcess:TheAbatementCouncilshalldevelopthedueprocessproceduresrequiredbySection(G)(3)(d)forPartiestodisputeorchallengeremedialactionstakenbytheAbatementCouncilforOpioidFundsfromtheStatewideInfrastructureShare.TheAbatementCouncil6DocuSign Envelope ID: A97F0DF8-5247-480F-B55A-658D8BCBC744
shallalsoabidebythedueprocessprinciplesrequiredbySection(F)(12)-(13)forRegionstodisputeorchallengeremedialactionstakenbytheAbatementCouncilforOpioidFundsfromtheRegionalShare.g.LegalStatus:TheAbatementCouncilshallnotconstituteaseparatelegalentity.h.LegalRepresentation:Totheextentpermittedbylaw,theStateshallprovidelegalcounseltoStateMembersforalllegalissuesarisingfromthoseStateMembers’workontheAbatementCouncil.Atalltimes,LocalGovernmentMembersoftheAbatementCouncilareentitledtoreceivelegalrepresentationfromtheirrespectivegovernmentalentities.Intheeventofaconflict,theAbatementCouncilanditsmembersmayretaintheservicesofotherlegalcounsel.i.Compensation:NomemberoftheAbatementCouncilshallbecompensatedfortheirworkrelatedtotheAbatementCouncil.D.StateShareInaccordancewithSections(B)(l)and(B)(2)(a),andthetermsofanySettlement,theStateShareshallbepaiddirectlytotheStateinaccordancewiththetermsofthisSection(D).2.TheStatemaintainsfulldiscretionoverdistributionoftheStateShareanywherewithintheStateofColorado,however,theStateShareshallbeusedforApprovedPurposesonly.TheStatewillworktoreduceadministrativecostsasmuchaspracticable.3.Onanannualbasis,asdeterniinedbytheAbatementCouncil,theStateshallprovideallexpendituredata,includingadministrativecosts,fromtheStateSharetotheAbatementCouncilforpurposesofmaintainingtransparencyinaccordancewithSection(C)(4)(c)(i).TheAbatementCouncilmayrequiretheStatetoprovideadditionaloutcome-relateddatainaccordancewithSection(C)(4)(c)(ii)andtheStateshallcomplywithsuchrequirements.4.IftheStatedisputestheamountofOpioidFundsitreceivesfromtheStateShare,theStateshallalerttheAbatementCouncilwithinsixty(60)daysofdiscoveringtheinformationunderlyingthedispute.FailuretoalerttheAbatementCouncilwithinthistimeframeshallnotconstituteawaiveroftheState’srighttoseekrecoupmentofanydeficiencyinitsStateShare.E.LGShareInaccordancewithSections(B)(1)and(B)(2)(b),andthetermsofanySettlement,theLGShareshallbepaiddirectlytoParticipatingLocalGovernmentsinaccordancewiththetermsofthisSection(E).7DocuSign Envelope ID: A97F0DF8-5247-480F-B55A-658D8BCBC744
2.AllocationstoParticipatingLocalGovernmentsfromtheLGShareshallfirstbedeterminedusingthepercentagesshowninExhibitD.3.TheLGShareforeachCountyAreashallthenbeallocatedamongthecountyandtheotherParticipatingLocalGovernmentswithinit.ExhibitEreflectsthedefaultallocationthatwillapplyunlesstheParticipatingLocalGovernmentswithinaCountyAreaenterintoawrittenagreementprovidingforadifferentallocation.TheParticipatingLocalGovernmentsmayelecttomodifytheallocationforaCountyAreainExhibitE,butsuchmodificationtotheallocationinExhibitEshallnotchangeaCountyArea’stotalallocationunderSection(E)(2).4.ALocalGovernmentthatchoosesnottobecomeaParticipatingLocalGovernmentwillnotreceiveadirectallocationfromtheLGShare.TheportionoftheLGSharethatwouldhavebeenallocatedtoaLocalGovernmentthatisnotaParticipatingLocalGovernmentwillinsteadbere-allocatedtotheRegionalSharefortheRegionwheretheLocalGovernmentislocated,inaccordancewithSection(F),below.5.IntheeventaParticipatingLocalGovernmentdissolvesorceasestoexistduringthetermofanySettlement,theallocationforthatParticipatingLocalGovernmentfromtheLGShareshallbere-allocatedasdirectedbyanySettlement,andifnotspecified,bere-allocatedtotheRegionalSharefortheRegioninwhichtheParticipatingLocalGovernmentwaslocated,inaccordancewithSection(F).IfaParticipatingLocalGovernmentmergeswithanotherParticipatingLocalGovernment,theallocationforthatParticipatingLocalGovernmentfromtheLGShareshallbere-allocatedasdirectedbyanySettlement,andifnotspecified,shallbere-allocatedtothesuccessorParticipatingLocalGovernment’sallocationoftheLGShare.IfaParticipatingLocalGovernmentmergeswithaLocalGovernmentthatisnotaParticipatingLocalGovernment,theallocationforthatParticipatingLocalGovernmentfromtheLGShareshallbere-allocatedasdirectedbyanySettlement,andifnotspecified,bere-allocatedtotheRegioninwhichthemergingParticipatingLocalGovernmentwaslocated,inaccordancewithSection(F),below.6.AParticipatingLocalGovernmentmayforegoitsallocationoftheLGShareanddirectitsallocationtotheRegionalSharefortheRegionwheretheParticipatingLocalGovernmentislocated,inaccordancewithSection(F)below,byaffirmativelynotifyingtheAbatementCouncilonanannualbasisofitsdecisiontoforegoitsallocationoftheLGShare.AParticipatingLocalGovernment’selectiontoforegoitsallocationoftheLGShareshallcarryovertothefollowingyearunlesstheParticipatingLocalGovernmentnotifiestheAbatementCouncilotherwise.IfaParticipatingLocalGovernmentelectstoforegoitsallocationoftheLGShare,theParticipatingLocalGovernmentshallbeexcusedfromthereportingrequirementsrequiredbySection(E)(8).7.ParticipatingLocalGovernmentsmaintainfulldiscretionoverthedistributionoftheirallocationoftheLGShareanywherewithintheStateofColorado,however,8DocuSign Envelope ID: A97F0DF8-5247-480F-B55A-658D8BCBC744
allParticipatingLocalGovernmentsshallusetheirallocationfromtheLGShareforApprovedPurposesonly.ReasonableadministrativecostsforaParticipatingLocalGovernmenttoadministeritsallocationoftheLGShareshallnotexceedactualcostsor10%oftheParticipatingLocalGovernment’sallocationoftheLGShare,whicheverisless.8.Onanannualbasis,asdeterminedbytheAbatementCouncil,allParticipatingLocalGovernmentsshallprovideallexpendituredata,includingadministrativecosts,fromtheirallocationoftheLGSharetotheAbatementCouncilforpurposesofmaintainingtransparencyinaccordancewithSection(C)(4)(c)(i).TheAbatementCouncilmayrequireParticipatingLocalGovernmentstoprovideadditionaloutcomerelateddatainaccordancewithSection(C)(4)(c)(ii)andallParticipatingLocalGovernmentsshallcomplywithsuchrequirements.9.IfanyParticipatingLocalGovernmentdisputestheamountofOpioidFundsitreceivesfromitsallocationoftheLGShare,theParticipatingLocalGovernmentshallalerttheAbatementCouncilwithinsixty(60)daysofdiscoveringtheinformationunderlyingthedispute.FailuretoalerttheAbatementCouncilwithinthistimeframeshallnotconstituteawaiveroftheParticipatingLocalGovernment’srighttoseekrecoupmentofanydeficiencyinitsLGShare.F.RegionalShareInaccordancewithSections(B)(l)and(B)(2)(c),andthetermsofanySettlement,theRegionalShareshallbepaidtotheRegionsinaccordancewiththetermsofthisSection(F).2.ParticipatingLocalGovernmentsshallorganizethemselvesintotheRegionsdepictedinExhibitC.MunicipalitieslocatedinmultipleRegionsmayjoinallorsomeoftheRegionsinwhichtheyarelocatedaccordingtoExhibitC.3.AllocationstoRegionswillbedistributedaccordingtoExhibitF.Formulti-countyRegions,eachRegion’ssharelistedinExhibitFiscalculatedbysummingtheindividualpercentageshareslistedinExhibitUforthecountieswithinthatRegion.ThepercentagesinExhibitFarebasedontheassumptionthateveryLocalGovernmentineachRegionbecomesaParticipatingLocalGovernment.4.Intheeventacity,town,orothermunicipalitythatisaParticipatingLocalGovernmentmerges,dissolves,orceasestoexistduringthetermofanySettlement,theallocationoftheRegionalShareowedtotheRegioninwhichthatParticipatingLocalGovernmentexistedshallbere-allocatedasdirectedbyanySettlement,andifnotspecified,shallnotbemodifiedfromExhibitF.IfacountythatisaParticipatingLocalGovernmentmergeswithanothercountywithinitsRegion,theallocationoftheRegionalShareowedtotheRegioninwhichthatcountyexistedshallbere-allocatedasdirectedbyanySettlement,andifnotspecified,shallnotbemodifiedfromExhibitF.IfacountythatisaParticipatingLocalGovernmentmergeswithacountyinadifferentRegionduringthetermof9DocuSign Envelope ID: A97F0DF8-5247-480F-B55A-658D8BCBC744
anySettlement,theallocationoftheRegionalShareowedtotheRegioninwhichthatcountyexistedshallbere-allocatedasdirectedbyanySettlement,andifnotspecified,shallbere-allocatedtotheRegioninwhichthatParticipatingLocalGovernmentmergedinaccordancewithExhibitF.5.EachRegionmustcreateitsownRegionalCouncilwhilegivingconsiderationtotheregionalgovernancemodelsillustratedinExhibitG.TheRegionalCouncilmustbeformedbytheParticipatingLocalGovernmentswithintheRegionandeachRegionalCouncilshalldesignateafiscalagentfortheRegion.Regionalfiscalagentsshallbecountyormunicipalgovernmentsonly.AllfundsfromtheRegionalShareshallbedistributedtotheRegionalCouncil’sidentifiedfiscalagentforthebenefitoftheentireRegion.a.SubjecttothisSectionF(5),eachRegionmaydraftitsownintra-regionalagreements,bylaws,orothergoverningdocumentstodeteriTlinehowtheRegionalCouncilwilloperate.However,eachvotingmemberofaRegionalCouncilshallbeanemployeeorelectedofficialofaParticipatingLocalGovernmentwithintheapplicableRegion.InthecaseofDenver,thevotingmembersofitsRegionalCouncilshallbeappointedbytheMayor.InthecaseofBroomfield,thevotingmembersofitsRegionalCouncilshallbeappointedbytheBroomfieldCityandCountyManager.b.TheRegionshallnotreceiveanyOpioidFundsfromtheRegionalShareuntiltheRegioncertifiestotheAbatementCouncilthatitsRegionalCouncilhasbeenformedandafiscalagenthasbeendesignated.SuchcertificationshallbeinasimpleformadoptedbytheRegionandmaybemadeviaemail,solongasitincludesthenamesandaffiliationsoftheRegionalCouncil’smembersandthedesignatedfiscalagent.c.IfaRegiondoesnotformandcertifyitsRegionalCouncilanddesignateitsfiscalagentwithinone-hundredandeighty(180)daysoftheEffectiveDate,theAbatementCouncilshallappointmemberstotheRegion’sRegionalCouncil.RegionalCouncilmembersappointedbytheAbatementCouncilshallserveuntiltheRegioncertifiestheformationofitsRegionalCounciltotheAbatementCouncil.d.ARegionshallsubmitarenewedcertificationrequiredbySection(F)(5)(b),above,whenitsmembershipchanges.e.IfamembershipvacancyexistsonaRegionalCouncilformorethanninety(90)daysandtheRegionalCouncilisunabletofillthevacancybyitsregularproceduresduringthattime,theAbatementCouncilshallappointareplacementmembertoserveuntiltheRegionfillsthevacancy.10DocuSign Envelope ID: A97F0DF8-5247-480F-B55A-658D8BCBC744
6.ALocalGovernmentthatchoosesnottobecomeaParticipatingLocalGovernmentshallnotreceiveanyOpioidFundsfromtheRegionalShareorparticipateintheRegionalCouncilsdescribedinSection(F)(5)above.7.EachRegionalCouncilshallmakerequeststotheAbatementCouncilforOpioidFundsfromtheirallocationoftheRegionalShare.EachRegionalCouncil’srequestforOpioidFundsfromtheRegionalShareshallbeaccompaniedbya2-yearplanidentifyingtheApprovedPurposesforwhichtherequestedfundswillbeusedbytheRegionanywherewithintheStateofColorado.ARegionalCouncil’s2-yearplanmaybeamendedsolongassuchamendmentscomplywiththetermsofthisMOUandanySettlement.AnyRegionalCouncilmayseekassistancefromtheAbatementCouncilforpurposesofdevelopingits2-yearplan.8.ReasonableadministrativecostsforaRegionalCounciltoadministeritsRegion’sallocationoftheRegionalShareshallnotexceedactualcostsor10%oftheRegion’sallocationoftheRegionalShare,whicheverisless.9.TheAbatementCouncilshallreleasefundsrequestedbyaRegionalCouncilinaccordancewithSection(B)(l)iftheRegionalCouncil’s2-yearplancomplieswiththeApprovedPurposes,thetermsofthisMOU,andthetermsofanySettlement.TheAbatementCouncilshallnotdenyanyfundingrequestfromaRegionalCouncilonthebasisthattheAbatementCouncildoesnotapproveoragreewiththeApprovedPurposesforwhichaRegionalCouncilrequestsOpioidFundsfromtheRegionalShare.NormaytheAbatementCouncilholdup,delay,ormakeunreasonablerequestsforadditionalorsupportinginformationoftheRegionalCouncilpriortoreleasingtherequestedOpioidFunds.ThepurposeofthisMOUistofacilitateOpioidFundstotheirintendedrecipientsquicklyandefficientlywithminimaladministrativeprocedure.10.Onanannualbasis,asdeterminedbytheAbatementCouncil,eachRegionalCouncil’sfiscalagentshallprovidetotheAbatementCounciltheRegionalCouncil’sexpendituredata,includingadministrativecosts,fromtheirallocationoftheRegionalShareandcertifytotheAbatementCouncilthattheRegionalCouncil’sexpenditureswereforApprovedPurposesandcompliedwithits2-yearplan.TheRegionalCouncilshallsubjectitselftoanaccountingattheAbatementCouncil’sdiscretion.a.TheAbatementCouncilshallreviewaRegionalCouncil’sexpendituredataandcertificationtoensurecompliancewiththeRegionalCouncil’s2-yearplan,theApprovedPurposes,andthetermsofthisMOUandanySettlement.b.TheAbatementCouncilshallpublishtheRegionalCouncil’sexpendituredata,includingadministrativecosts,fromtheRegionalShareinaccordancewithSection(C)(4)(c)(i).TheAbatementCouncilmayrequireRegionalCouncilstoprovideadditionaloutcomerelateddatain11DocuSign Envelope ID: A97F0DF8-5247-480F-B55A-658D8BCBC744
accordancewithSection(C)(4)(c)(ii)andallRegionalCouncilsshallcomplywithsuchrequirements.11.IfanyRegionalCouncildisputestheamountofOpioidFundsitreceivesfromitsallocationoftheRegionalShare,theRegionalCouncilshallalerttheAbatementCouncilwithinsixty(60)daysofdiscoveringtheinformationunderlyingthedispute.FailuretoalerttheAbatementCouncilwithinthistimeframeshallnotconstituteawaiveroftheRegionalCouncil’srighttoseekrecoupmentofanydeficiencyinitsRegionalShare.12.IftheAbatementCouncilhasreasontobelieveaRegion’sexpenditureofitsallocationoftheRegionalSharedidnotcomplywiththeRegion’s2-yearPlan,theApprovedPurposes,thetermsofthisMOUoranySettlement,asdescribedinthisSection(F),orthattheRegionotherwisemisuseditsallocationoftheRegionalShare,theAbatementCouncilmaytakeremedialactionagainsttheallegedoffendingRegion.SuchremedialactionislefttothediscretionoftheAbatementCouncilandmayincludebutnotbelimitedto,withholdingfutureOpioidsFundsowedtotheoffendingRegionorrequiringtheoffendingRegiontoreimburseimproperlyexpendedOpioidFundstotheRegionalShare.13.Withinonehundredandtwenty(120)daysoftheAbatementCouncilbeingformed,inaccordancewithSection(C)(2)(c)above,theAbatementCouncilshalldevelopandpublishdueprocessproceduresforallowingaRegiontochallengeordisputeanyremedialactiontakenbytheAbatementCouncil,includingtimelinesduringwhichtheRegionmayengageinsuchachallengeordispute.Suchdueprocessproceduresshallreflect,ataminimum,thefollowingprinciples:a.UponlearningofanyconductthatmaywarrantremedialactionagainstaRegion,theAbatementCouncilshallfirstprovidenoticetotheRegionoftheconductatissue,providetheRegionanopportunitytorespond,and,ifappropriate,curetheallegedoffendingconduct.IfafterprovidingtheRegionsuchnoticeandopportunitiestorespondandcure,theAbatementCouncilcontinuestobelieveremedialactioniswarranted,theAbatementCouncilmaytakesuchremedialaction.b.IftheAbatementCouncildecidestotakeremedialactionagainstanallegedoffendingRegion,suchactionmayonlyoccurbyatwo-thirdssupermajorityvoteoftheAbatementCouncil.Thus,anAbatementCouncilmadeupoftwelve(12)votingmembersrequiresavoteofeight(8)MemberspriortotakingremedialactionagainstanallegedoffendingRegion.c.PriortotakinganyremedialactionagainstanallegedoffendingRegion,theAbatementCouncilshallfirstprovidenoticetotheallegedoffendingRegionoftheremedialactiontobetakenandthefactsunderlyingsuchremedialaction.TheAbatementCouncilshallthenprovidethealleged12DocuSign Envelope ID: A97F0DF8-5247-480F-B55A-658D8BCBC744
offendingRegionanopportunitytochallengeordisputetheremedialactioninaccordancewith,ataminimum,theprinciplesbelow:i.TheallegedoffendingRegionmayrequestrevisionsormodificationstotheproposedremedialaction;ii.TheallegedoffendingRegionmaysubmitawrittenresponsetoand/orrequestahearingbeforetheAbatementCouncil,orathird—partyhearingofficer,3regardingtheallegedoffendingconductandproposedremedialaction;andiii.Aftersuchwrittenresponsesaresubmittedandreviewedand/orahearingisconducted,theallegedoffendingRegionmaysubmitanappealtotheAbatementCouncilofthedecisiontotakeremedialaction.d.RemedialactionstakenbytheAbatementCouncil,inaccordancewiththedueprocessprinciplesdetailedabove,shallbeconsideredfinalnon-appealableordersandoffendingRegionsmaynotseekjudicialrelieffromremedialactiontakenbytheAbatementCouncil,exceptasprovidedinSection(H),below.e.SubjecttoSection(H)(2),below,ifanyParty(ies)believestheAbatementCouncilviolatedthetermsofthisMOU,suchParty(ies)mayseektoenforcethetermsofthisMOU.14.IftheAbatementCouncilhasreasontobelieveaRegion’sconduct,ortheconductofanyParticipatingLocalGovernmentorindividualinthatRegion,amountstoaviolationofanycriminallaw,theAbatementCouncilshallrefersuchmatterstotheappropriateauthoritiesandmayconsidersuchconductinitsdeterminationofanyremedialactiontobetaken.15.IftheAbatementCouncilhasreasontobelievethatanindividualinvolvedinthereceiptoradministrationofOpioidFundsfromtheRegionalSharehasviolatedanyapplicableethicsrulesorcodes,theAbatementCouncilshallnotattempttoadjudicatesuchaviolation.Insuchinstances,theAbatementCouncilshalllodgeacomplaintwiththeappropriateforumforhandlingsuchethicalmatters,suchasalocalhomerulemunicipality’sethicsboard.16.CostsassociatedwiththeAbatementCouncil’sdistributionandoversightoftheRegionalShare,asdescribedaboveinthisSection(F),includingcostsassociatedwithanyremedialactionbytheAbatementCouncil,shallbepaidfromtheStatewideOnlyanallegedoffendingRegionmayrequesttheappointmentofathird-partyhearingofficertoreviewanywrittenresponsesandconductanyrequestedhearings.IfanallegedoffendingRegionmakessucharequest,theAbatementCouncilhassolediscretiontoappointthethird-partyhearingofficerandtheallegedoffendingRegionshallbearthecostofsuchreviewand/orhearingbythethird-partyhearingofficer.13DocuSign Envelope ID: A97F0DF8-5247-480F-B55A-658D8BCBC744
InfrastructureShare.TheAbatementCouncilshallmakeallgoodfaitheffortstolimitsuchcoststothegreatestextentpossible.G.StatewideInfrastructureShareInaccordancewithSectionsB(1)and(B)(2)(d),andthetermsofanySettlement,theStatewideInfrastructureShareshallbepaidtoanyPartyorRegionalCouncilinaccordancewiththisSection(G).2.ThepurposeoftheStatewideInfrastructureShareistopromotecapitalimprovementsandprovideoperationalassistancefordevelopingorimprovingtheinfrastructurenecessarytoabatetheopioidcrisisanywherewithintheStateofColorado.TheStatewideInfrastructureShareisintendedtosupplementOpioidFundsreceivedbyanyPartyorRegion.3.PriortodistributinganyOpioidFundsfromtheStatewideInfrastructureShare,theAbatementCouncilshallestablishandpublishpoliciesandproceduresforthedistributionandoversightoftheStatewideInfrastructureShare,includingprocessesforPartiesorRegionstoapplyforOpioidFundsfromtheStatewideInfrastructureShare.TheAbatementCouncil’spoliciesandproceduresshall,ataminimum,reflectthefollowingprinciples:a.OpioidFundsfromtheStatewideInfrastructureShareshallbeusedforApprovedPurposesonly;b.OpioidFundsfromtheStatewideInfrastructureShareshallbepaiddirectlytotheappropriatestateagencies(includingbutnotlimitedtotheColoradoDepartmentofLaw),Regionalfiscalagents,orParticipatingLocalGovernmentsonly;c.DistributionandoversightoftheStatewideInfrastructureShareshallcomplywiththetermsofthisMOUandanySettlement;d.AppropriateprocessesforremedialactionwillbetakenagainstPartiesorRegionsthatmisuseOpioidFundsfromtheStatewideInfrastructureShare.SuchprocessesshallincludeproceduresforallegedoffendingPartiesorRegionstochallengeordisputesuchremedialaction;ande.LimitationsonadministrativecoststobeexpendedbyrecipientsforadministeringOpioidFundsreceivedfromtheStatewideInfrastructureFund,nottoexceedactualcostsexpendedbytherecipientor10%oftheamountreceived,whicheverisless.4.ThedistributionandoversightpoliciesandproceduresdevelopedbytheAbatementCouncil,inaccordancewithSection(G)(3),shallbenon-appealableordersandnoPartyorRegionmayseekjudicialreliefrelatedtothedistributionandoversightoftheStatewideInfrastructureShare.14DocuSign Envelope ID: A97F0DF8-5247-480F-B55A-658D8BCBC744
5.Onanannualbasis,asdeterminedbytheAbatementCouncil,anyPartyorRegionalCouncilthatreceivesfundsfromtheStatewideInfrastructureShareshallprovideallexpendituredata,includingadministrativecosts,relatedtoanyOpioidFundsitreceivedfromtheStatewideInfrastructureShareandsubjectitselftoanaccountingasrequiredbytheAbatementCouncil.TheAbatementCouncilshallpublishallexpendituredatafromtheStatewideInfrastructureShareinaccordancewithSection(C)(4)(c)(i).TheAbatementCouncilmayrequirethePartiesorRegionalCouncilsthatreceivefundsfromtheStatewideInfrastructureSharetoprovideadditionaloutcomerelateddatainaccordancewithSection(C)(4)(c)(ii)andthePartiesorRegionalCouncilsshallcomplywithsuchrequirements.6.CostsassociatedwiththeAbatementCouncil’sdistributionandoversightoftheStatewideInfrastructureShare,asdescribedinthisSection(G),shallbepaidforfromtheStatewideInfrastructureShare.TheAbatementCouncilshallmakeallgoodfaitheffortstolimitsuchcoststothegreatestextentpossible.H.GeneralTermsAllPartiesandRegionalCouncilsshallmaintainallrecordsrelatedtothereceiptandexpenditureofOpioidFundsfornolessthanfive(5)yearsandshallmakesuchrecordsavailableforreviewbytheAbatementCouncil,anyotherPartyorRegionalCouncil,orthepublic.RecordsrequestedbythepublicshallbeproducedinaccordancewithColorado’sopenrecordslaws.RecordsrequestedbytheAbatementCounciloranotherPartyoraRegionalCouncilshallbeproducedwithintwenty-one(21)daysofthedatetherecordrequestwasreceived.ThisrequirementdoesnotsupplantanyPartyorRegionalCouncil’sobligationsunderColorado’sopenrecordslaws.2.IfanyParty(ies)believestheAbatementCouncilhasviolatedthetermsofthisMOU,theallegingParty(ies)mayseektoenforcethetermsofthisMOU,providedtheallegingParty(ies)firstprovidesnoticetotheAbatementCounciloftheallegedviolationandareasonableopportunitytocuretheallegedviolation.Insuchanenforcementaction,theallegingParty(ies)mayonlyseektoenforcethetermsoftheMOUagainsttheStateandtheParticipatingLocalGovernmentsfromwhichtheLocalGovernmentMembersoftheAbatementCouncilwereappointedandmayonlyseekdeclaratoryand/orinjunctivereliefIndefenseofsuchanenforcementaction,theState’sMembersoftheAbatementCouncilshallberepresentedbytheStateandtheLocalGovernmentMembersshallberepresentedbytheParticipatingLocalGovernmentsfromwhichtheLocalGovernmentMemberswereappointed.Intheeventofaconflict,theAbatementCouncilanditsMembersmayseekoutsiderepresentationtodefenditselfagainstsuchanenforcementaction.3.IfanyParty(ies)believesanotherParty(ies),notincludingtheAbatementCouncil,violatedthetermsofthisMOU,theallegingParty(ies)mayseektoenforcethetermsofthisMOUinthecourtinwhichanyapplicableSettlement(s)wasentered,providedtheallegingParty(ies)firstprovidetheallegedoffendingParty(ies)15DocuSign Envelope ID: A97F0DF8-5247-480F-B55A-658D8BCBC744
noticeoftheallegedviolation(s)andareasonableopportunitytocuretheallegedviolation(s).Insuchanenforcementaction,anyallegingPartyorallegedoffendingParty(ies)mayberepresentedbytheirrespectivepublicentityinaccordancewithColoradolaw.4.NothinginthisMOUshallbeinterpretedtowaivetherightofanyPartytoseekjudicialreliefforconductoccurringoutsidethescopeofthisMOUthatviolatesanyColoradolaw.Insuchanaction,theallegedoffendingParty(ies),includingtheAbatementCouncil,mayberepresentedbytheirrespectivepublicentitiesinaccordancewithColoradolaw.Intheeventofaconflict,anyParty,includingtheAbatementCouncilanditsMembers,mayseekoutsiderepresentationtodefenditselfagainstsuchanaction.5.IfanyParty(ies)believesanotherParty(ies),Region(s),orindividual(s)involvedinthereceipt,distribution,oradministrationofOpioidsFundshasviolatedanyapplicableethicscodesorrules,acomplaintshallbelodgedwiththeappropriateforumforhandlingsuchmatters,suchasalocalhomerulemunicipality’sethicsboard.6.IfanyParty(ies)believesanotherParty(ies),Region(s),orindividual(s)involvedinthereceipt,distribution,oradministrationofOpioidFundsviolatedanyColoradocriminallaw,suchconductshallbereportedtotheappropriatecriminalauthorities.7.VenueforanylegalactionrelatedtothisMOUshallbeinacourtofcompetentjurisdictionwhereanyapplicableSettlement(s)isentered.8.BecauserecoveryunderthetermsofdifferentSettlement(s)mayvarydependingonthenumberofPartiesrequiredtoeffectuateaSettlement,thePartiesmayconditionallyagreetosignontotheMOUthroughaletterofintent,resolutionorsimilarwrittenstatement,declarationorpronouncementdeclaringtheirintenttosignontotheMOUifthethresholdforPartyparticipationinaspecificSettlementisachieved.49.ThisMOUmaybeexecutedintwoormorecounterparts,eachofwhichshallbedeemedanoriginal,butallofwhichshallconstituteoneandthesameinstrument.ThePartiesapprovetheuseofelectronicsignaturesforexecutionofthisMOU.AlluseofelectronicsignaturesshallbegovernedbytheUnifonnElectronicTransactionsAct,C.R.S.§24-71.3-101,etseq.ThePartiesagreenottodenythelegaleffectorenforceabilityoftheMOUsolelybecauseitisinelectronicformorForinstance,theJuly21,2021“DistributorSettlementAgreement”includesa“SubdivisionSettlementAgreementForm”that,oncefilledoutandexecuted,ismeanttoindicatethatLocalGovernment’s(orSubdivision’s)electiontoparticipateinthatDistributorSettlementandalso,torequirethatLocalGovernmenttotakestepstoformallyreleaseanyclaimitmayhaveagainsttheSettlingDistributors.WithregardtotheDistributorSettlementAgreementoranyotherSettlementsthatincludeaformsimilartotheSubdivisionSettlementAgreementForm,thePartiesmaystillconditionallyagreetosignontotheMOUif,forinstance,thethresholdforPartyparticipationinaspecificSettlementisachieved.16DocuSign Envelope ID: A97F0DF8-5247-480F-B55A-658D8BCBC744
becauseanelectronicrecordwasusedinitsformation.ThePartiesagreenottoobjecttotheadmissibilityoftheMOUintheformofanelectronicrecord,orapapercopyofanelectronicdocument,orapapercopyofadocumentbearinganelectronicsignature,onthegroundthatitisanelectronicrecordorelectronicsignatureorthatitisnotinitsoriginalformorisnotanoriginal.10.EachpartyrepresentsthatallproceduresnecessarytoauthorizesuchParty’sexecutionofthisMOUhavebeenperformedandthatthepersonsigningforsuchPartyhasbeenauthorizedtoexecutetheMOU.PaymentofCounselandLitigationExpensesThroughaBack-StopFundSomeSettlements,includingtheMcKessonCorporation,CardinalHealth,Inc.,andAmerisourceBergenCorporation(“Distributor”)andJohnson&JohnsonlJanssen(“J&J”)settlements,mayprovideforthepaymentofalloraportionofthefeesandlitigationexpensesowedbyParticipatingLocalGovernmentstocounselspecificallyretainedtofilesuitintheopioidlitigation.IfanySettlementisinsufficienttocoverthefeeobligationsoftheParticipatingLocalGovernments(asdiscussedandmodifiedbyJudgePolster’sOrderofAugust6regardingfeesfortheDistributorandJ&Jsettlements),thedeficiencieswillbecoveredassetforthinfurtherdetailbelow.2.ThePartiesalsorecognizethat,asintheDistributorandJ&Jsettlements,certainOpioidSettlingDefendantsmayofferpremiumsbenefitingtheentirestateofColoradowhenParticipatingLocalGovernmentsagreetotheSettlement(s),therebysettlingtheirclaimsintheiron-goinglawsuits.Forexample,belowisthechartillustratinghowIncentivePaymentB(a25%premiumtotheentirestate)worksintheDistributorSettlementatSectionIV.F.2.b(p.20):PercentageofLitigatingSubdivisionPopulationthatisIncentiveBEligibleSubdivisionIncentivel’aynientBPopulation”EligibilityPercentageLipto5%0%5°’—.30%6+40%91+50%95+60%99%—95%l00’l00’3.IfthecourtinInRe:NationalPrescriptionOpiateLitigation,MDLNo.2804(N.D.Ohio),orifaSettlementestablishesacommonbenefitfundorsimilardevicetocompensateattorneysforservicesrenderedandexpensesincurredthathavebenefitedplaintiffsgenerallyinthelitigation(the“CommonBenefitFund”),17DocuSign Envelope ID: A97F0DF8-5247-480F-B55A-658D8BCBC744
and/orrequirescertaingovernmentalplaintiffstopayashareoftheirrecoveriesfromdefendantsintotheCommonBenefitFund(“Court-OrderedCommonBenefitFundAssessment”),thentheParticipatingLocalGovernmentsshallberequiredtofirstseektohavetheirattorneys’feesandexpensespaidthroughtheCommonBenefitFund.4.FortheDistributorandJ&Jsettlementsonly,counselforParticipatingLocalGovernmentsshallhavetheirexpensesotherwiserecoverablefromColoradoParticipatingLocalGovernmentscompensatedonlythroughtheCommonBenefitFund(s)establishedinthosesettlement(s).Fortheavoidanceofdoubt,counselforParticipatingLocalGovernmentsmayrecovertheirattorneys’feesthroughtheDistributorandJ&JsettlementsandthroughtheotherapplicableprovisionsofthisSection(I).5.Inaddition,asameansofcoveringanydeficienciesinpayingcounselforParticipatingLocalGovernments,asupplementalColoradoAttorneyFeeBackStopFundshallbeestablished.TheColoradoAttorneyFeeBack-StopFundistobeusedtocompensatecounselforParticipatingLocalGovernmentsthatfiledaninitialcomplaintintheopioidlitigationbySeptember1,2020(“LitigatingParticipatingLocalGovernments”).6.PaymentsoutoftheColoradoAttorneyFeeBack-StopFundshallbedeterminedbyacommittee(the“OpioidFeeandExpenseCommittee”).TheOpioidFeeandExpenseCommitteeshallconsistofthefollowingfive(5)members:a.One(1)memberappointedbyCCIfromalitigatingcountyorfromalitigatingcountyandcitymunicipalcorporation;b.One(1)memberappointedbyCMLfromalitigatingcity;c.One(1)memberappointedjointlybyCCIandCMLfromanon-litigatingcountyorcity;d.One(1)memberappointedbytheAttorneyGeneral’sOffice;ande.One(1)neutralmemberjointlyappointedbyalloftheothermemberslistedabove.7.TheColoradoAttorneyFeeBack-StopFundshallbefundedasfollowsfromanySettlement,excludingsettlementsinvolvingMcKinseyandpaymentsresultingfromthePurdueorMallinckrodtbankruptcy.ForpurposesonlyofcalculatingthefundingoftheColoradoAttorneyFeeBack-StopFund,thePartiesdeem58%ofthetotalLGShareandRegionalSharetobeattributabletotheLitigatingLocalGovernments.TheColoradoAttorneyFeeBack-StopFundshallbefundedby8.7%ofthetotalLGShareand4.35%ofthetotalRegionalShareatthetimesuchfundsareactuallyreceived.NofundsdepositedintotheColoradoAttorneyFeeBack-StopFundwillbetakenfromtheStatewideInfrastructureShareorStateShare.18DocuSign Envelope ID: A97F0DF8-5247-480F-B55A-658D8BCBC744
8.CounselforLitigatingParticipatingLocalGovernmentsmayapplytotheColoradoAttorneyFeeBack-StopFundonlyafterapplyingtotheCommonBenefitFund.9.CounselforLitigatingParticipatingLocalGovernmentsmayapplytotheColoradoAttorneyFeeBack-StopFundforonlyashortfallthatis,thedifferencebetweenwhattheirfeeagreementswouldentitlethemto(aslimitedbythisSection(I))minuswhattheyhavealreadycollectedfromtheCommonBenefitFund(includingboththe“commonbenefit”and“contingencyfee”calculations,ifany).Iftheyreceivefees/costsforcommonbenefitworkinthenationalfeefund,thesefees/costswillbeallocatedproportionatelyacrossalltheirlocalgovernmentopioidclientsbasedontheallocationmodelusedintheNegotiationClasswebsitetoallocatetheappropriateportiontoColoradoclients.10.CounselforLitigatingParticipatingLocalGovernmentsarelimitedtobeingpaid,atmost,andassumingadequatefundsareavailableinanyCommonBenefitFundandColoradoAttorneyFeeBack-StopFund,feesinanamountequalto15%oftheLGShareand7.5%oftheRegionalShareattributabletotheirColoradoclients.11.AnyfundsremainingintheColoradoAttorneyFeeBack-StopFundinexcessoftheamountsneededtocoverthefeesandlitigationexpensesowedbyLitigatingParticipatingLocalGovernmentstotheirrespectivecounselshallreverttotheParticipatingLocalGovernmentsaccordingtotheallocationsdescribedinSections(E)and(F).Everytwoyears,theOpioidFeeandExpenseCommitteeshallassesstheamountremainingintheColoradoAttorneyFeeBack-StopFundtodetermineifitisoverfunded.12.Despitethefactthatalitigatingentitybonusbenefitstheentirestate,noportionoftheStateShareshallbeusedtofundtheColoradoAttorneyFeeBack-StopFundorinanyotherwaytofundanyParticipatingLocalGovernment’sattorneys’feesandexpenses.Becausethestatedidnothireoutsidecounsel,anyfundsforattorneysfeesthatthestatereceivesfromtheJ&JandDistributorsettlementwillbedepositedintotheStateShare.13.ToparticipateintheColoradoAttorneyFeeBack-StopFund,counselmustfollowtherequirementsofC.R.S.§13-17-304.19DocuSign Envelope ID: A97F0DF8-5247-480F-B55A-658D8BCBC744
ThisColoradoOpioidsSettlementMemorandumofUnderstandingissignedthisdayof,O2.Lby:ColoradorneyGeneralPhilipJ.Weiser20DocuSign Envelope ID: A97F0DF8-5247-480F-B55A-658D8BCBC744
21
This Colorado Opioids Settlement Memorandum of Understanding is signed
this ___ day of _____________, _____ by:
COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO,
By and Through Its BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS
By: ______________________________
Matt Scherr, Chair
Attest:
By: _________________________________
Regina O’Brien, Clerk to the Board
DocuSign Envelope ID: A97F0DF8-5247-480F-B55A-658D8BCBC744
26 October 2021
Exhibit A
DocuSign Envelope ID: A97F0DF8-5247-480F-B55A-658D8BCBC744
POTENTIAL OPIOID ABATEMENT APPROVED PURPOSES
I.TREATMENT
A.TREATMENT OF OPIOID USE DISORDER AND ITS EFFECTS
1.Expand availability of treatment, including Medication-Assisted Treatment
(MAT), for Opioid Use Disorder (OUD) and any co-occurring substance use or
mental health issues.
2.Supportive housing, all forms of FDA-approved MAT, counseling, peer-support,
recovery case management and residential treatment with access to medications
for those who need it.
3.Treatment of mental health trauma issues that resulted from the traumatic
experiences of the opioid user (e.g., violence, sexual assault, human trafficking)
and for family members (e.g., surviving family members after an overdose or
overdose fatality).
4.Expand telehealth to increase access to OUD treatment, including MAT, as well
as counseling, psychiatric support, and other treatment and recovery support
services.
5.Fellowships for addiction medicine specialists for direct patient care, instructors,
and clinical research for treatments.
6.Scholarships for certified addiction counselors.
7.Clinicians to obtain training and a waiver under the federal Drug Addiction
Treatment Act to prescribe MAT for OUD.
8.Training for health care providers, students, and other supporting professionals,
such as peer recovery coaches/recovery outreach specialists, including but not
limited to training relating to MAT and harm reduction.
9.Dissemination of accredited web-based training curricula, such as the American
Academy of Addiction Psychiatry’s Provider Clinical Support Service-Opioids
web-based training curriculum and motivational interviewing.
10.Development and dissemination of new accredited curricula, such as the
American Academy of Addiction Psychiatry’s Provider Clinical Support Service
Medication-Assisted Treatment.
11.Development of a multistate/nationally accessible database whereby health care
providers can list currently available in-patient and out-patient OUD treatment
services that are accessible on a real-time basis.
EXHIBIT A
DocuSign Envelope ID: A97F0DF8-5247-480F-B55A-658D8BCBC744
12. Support and reimburse services that include the full American Society of
Addiction Medicine (ASAM) continuum of care for OUD.
13. Improve oversight of Opioid Treatment Programs (OTPs) to assure evidence-
informed practices such as adequate methadone dosing.
B. INTERVENTION
1. Ensure that health care providers are screening for OUD and other risk factors and
know how to appropriately counsel and treat (or refer, if necessary) a patient for
OUD treatment.
2. Fund Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) programs
to reduce the transition from use to disorder.
3. Training and long-term implementation of SBIRT in key systems (health, schools,
colleges, criminal justice, and probation), with a focus on the late adolescence and
young adulthood when transition from misuse to opioid disorder is most common.
4. Purchase automated versions of SBIRT and support ongoing costs of the
technology.
5. Training for emergency room personnel treating opioid overdose patients on post-
discharge planning, including community referrals for MAT, recovery case
management and/or support services.
6. Support work of Emergency Medical Systems, including peer support specialists,
to connect individuals to treatment or other appropriate services following an
opioid overdose or other opioid-related adverse event.
7. Create school-based contacts whom parents can engage to seek immediate
treatment services for their child.
8. Develop best practices on addressing OUD in the workplace.
9. Support assistance programs for health care providers with OUD.
10. Engage non-profits and faith community as a system to support outreach for
treatment.
C. CRIMINAL-JUSTICE-INVOLVED PERSONS
1. Address the needs of persons involved in the criminal justice system who have
OUD and any co-occurring substance use disorders or mental health (SUD/MH)
issues.
EXHIBIT A
DocuSign Envelope ID: A97F0DF8-5247-480F-B55A-658D8BCBC744
2. Support pre-arrest diversion and deflection strategies for persons with OUD and
any co-occurring SUD/MH issues, including established strategies such as:
a. Self-referral strategies such as Angel Programs or the Police Assisted
Addiction Recovery Initiative (PAARI);
b. Active outreach strategies such as the Drug Abuse Response Team
(DART) model;
c. “Naloxone Plus” strategies, which work to ensure that individuals who
have received Naloxone to reverse the effects of an overdose are then
linked to treatment programs;
d. Officer prevention strategies, such as the Law Enforcement Assisted
Diversion (LEAD) model; or
e. Officer intervention strategies such as the Leon County, Florida Adult
Civil Citation Network.
3. Support pre-trial services that connect individuals with OUD and any co-
occurring SUD/MH issues to evidence-informed treatment, including MAT, and
related services.
4. Support treatment and recovery courts for persons with OUD and any co-
occurring SUD/MH issues, but only if they provide referrals to evidence-informed
treatment, including MAT.
5. Provide evidence-informed treatment, including MAT, recovery support, harm
reduction, or other appropriate services to individuals with OUD and any co-
occurring SUD/MH issues who are incarcerated, on probation, or on parole.
6. Provide evidence-informed treatment, including MAT, recovery support, harm
reduction, or other appropriate re-entry services to individuals with OUD and any
co-occurring SUD/MH issues who are leaving jail or prison or who have recently
left jail or prison.
7. Support critical time interventions (CTI), particularly for individuals living with
dual-diagnosis OUD/serious mental illness, and services for individuals who face
immediate risks and service needs and risks upon release from correctional
settings.
D. WOMEN WHO ARE OR MAY BECOME PREGNANT
1. Evidence-informed treatment, including MAT, recovery, and prevention services
for pregnant women or women who could become pregnant and have OUD.
2. Training for obstetricians and other healthcare personnel that work with pregnant
women and their families regarding OUD treatment.
EXHIBIT A
DocuSign Envelope ID: A97F0DF8-5247-480F-B55A-658D8BCBC744
3. Other measures to address Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome, including prevention,
care for addiction and education programs.
4. Child and family supports for parenting women with OUD.
5. Enhanced family supports and child care services for parents receiving treatment
for OUD.
E. PEOPLE IN TREATMENT AND RECOVERY
1. The full continuum of care of recovery services for OUD and any co-occurring
substance use or mental health issues, including supportive housing, residential
treatment, medical detox services, peer support services and counseling,
community navigators, case management, and connections to community-based
services.
2. Identifying successful recovery programs such as physician, pilot, and college
recovery programs, and providing support and technical assistance to increase the
number and capacity of high-quality programs to help those in recovery.
3. Training and development of procedures for government staff to appropriately
interact and provide social and other services to current and recovering opioid
users, including reducing stigma.
4. Community-wide stigma reduction regarding treatment and support for persons
with OUD, including reducing the stigma on effective treatment.
5. Engaging non-profits and faith community as a system to support family members
in their efforts to help the opioid user in the family.
II. PREVENTION
F. PRESCRIBING PRACTICES
1. Training for health care providers regarding safe and responsible opioid
prescribing, dosing, and tapering patients off opioids.
2. Academic counter-detailing.
3. Continuing Medical Education (CME) on prescribing of opioids.
4. Support for non-opioid pain treatment alternatives, including training providers to
offer or refer to multi-modal, evidence-informed treatment of pain.
5. Fund development of a multistate/national prescription drug monitoring program
(PDMP) that permits information sharing while providing appropriate safeguards
on sharing of private information, including but not limited to:
EXHIBIT A
DocuSign Envelope ID: A97F0DF8-5247-480F-B55A-658D8BCBC744
a. Integration of PDMP data with electronic health records, overdose
episodes, and decision support tools for health care providers relating to
OUD.
b. Ensuring PDMPs incorporate available overdose/naloxone deployment
data, including the United States Department of Transportation’s
Emergency Medical Technician overdose database.
6. Educating dispensers on appropriate opioid dispensing.
G. MISUSE OF OPIOIDS
1. Corrective advertising/affirmative public education campaigns.
2. Public education relating to drug disposal.
3. Drug take-back disposal or destruction programs.
4. Fund community anti-drug coalitions that engage in drug-abuse prevention
efforts.
5. School-based programs that have demonstrated effectiveness in preventing drug
misuse and seem likely to be effective in preventing the uptake and use of
opioids.
6. Support community coalitions in implementing evidence-informed prevention,
such as reduced social access and physical access, stigma reduction – including
staffing, educational campaigns, or training of coalitions in evidence-informed
implementation.
7. School and community education programs and campaigns for students, families,
school employees, school athletic programs, parent-teacher and student
associations, and others.
8. Engaging non-profits and faith community as a system to support prevention.
H. OVERDOSE DEATHS AND OTHER HARMS
1. Increasing availability and distribution of naloxone and other drugs that treat
overdoses to first responders, overdose patients, opioid users, families and friends
of opioid users, schools, community navigators and outreach workers, drug
offenders upon release from jail/prison, and other members of the general public.
2. Training and education regarding naloxone and other drugs that treat overdoses
for first responders, overdose patients, patients taking opioids, families, schools,
and other members of the general public.
EXHIBIT A
DocuSign Envelope ID: A97F0DF8-5247-480F-B55A-658D8BCBC744
3. Developing data tracking software and applications for overdoses/naloxone
revivals.
4. Public education relating to emergency responses to overdoses.
5. Free naloxone for anyone in the community.
6. Public education relating to immunity and Good Samaritan laws.
7. Educating first responders regarding the existence and operation of immunity and
Good Samaritan laws.
8. Syringe service programs, including supplies, staffing, space, peer support
services, and the full range of harm reduction and treatment services provided by
these programs.
9. Expand access to testing and treatment for infectious diseases such as HIV and
Hepatitis C resulting from intravenous opioid use.
III. ADDITIONAL AREAS
I. SERVICES FOR CHILDREN
1. Support for children’s services: Fund additional positions and services, including
supportive housing and other residential services, relating to children being
removed from the home and/or placed in foster care due to custodial opioid use.
J. FIRST RESPONDERS
1. Law enforcement expenditures relating to the opioid epidemic.
2. Educating first responders regarding appropriate practices and precautions when
dealing with fentanyl or other drugs.
3. Increase electronic prescribing to prevent diversion and forgery.
K. COMMUNITY LEADERSHIP
1. Regional planning to identify goals for opioid reduction and support efforts or to
identify areas and populations with the greatest needs for treatment intervention
services.
2. Government dashboard to track key opioid-related indicators and supports as
identified through collaborative community processes.
EXHIBIT A
DocuSign Envelope ID: A97F0DF8-5247-480F-B55A-658D8BCBC744
L. STAFFING AND TRAINING
1. Funding for programs and services regarding staff training and networking to
improve staff capability to abate the opioid crisis.
2. Support infrastructure and staffing for collaborative cross-systems coordination to
prevent opioid misuse, prevent overdoses, and treat those with OUD (e.g., health
care, primary care, pharmacies, PDMPs, etc.).
M. RESEARCH
1. Funding opioid abatement research.
2. Research improved service delivery for modalities such as SBIRT that
demonstrate promising but mixed results in populations vulnerable to OUD.
3. Support research for novel harm reduction and prevention efforts such as the
provision of fentanyl test strips.
4. Support for innovative supply-side enforcement efforts such as improved
detection of mail-based delivery of synthetic opioids.
5. Expanded research for swift/certain/fair models to reduce and deter opioid misuse
within criminal justice populations that build upon promising approaches used to
address other substances (e.g. Hawaii HOPE and Dakota 24/7).
6. Research expanded modalities such as prescription methadone that can expand
access to MAT.
N. OTHER
1. Administrative costs for any of the approved purposes on this list.
4828-8658-5793, v. 8
EXHIBIT A
DocuSign Envelope ID: A97F0DF8-5247-480F-B55A-658D8BCBC744
Exhibit B
DocuSign Envelope ID: A97F0DF8-5247-480F-B55A-658D8BCBC744
Colorado Local Governments*
Government Name County Gov't Type
Multi-
County
Adams County Adams County
Arvada Adams City 2 counties
Aurora Adams City 3 counties
Bennett Adams City 2 counties
Brighton Adams City 2 counties
Commerce City Adams City
Federal Heights Adams City
Lochbuie Adams City 2 counties
Northglenn Adams City 2 counties
Thornton Adams City 2 counties
Westminster Adams City 2 counties
Alamosa County Alamosa County
Alamosa Alamosa City
Hooper Alamosa City
Arapahoe County Arapahoe County
Aurora Arapahoe City 3 counties
Bennett Arapahoe City 2 counties
Bow Mar Arapahoe City 2 counties
Centennial Arapahoe City
Cherry Hills Village Arapahoe City
Columbine Valley Arapahoe City
Deer Trail Arapahoe City
Englewood Arapahoe City
Foxfield Arapahoe City
Glendale Arapahoe City
Greenwood Village Arapahoe City
Littleton Arapahoe City 3 counties
Sheridan Arapahoe City
Archuleta County Archuleta County
Pagosa Springs Archuleta City
Baca County Baca County
Campo Baca City
Pritchett Baca City
Springfield Baca City
Two Buttes Baca City
Vilas Baca City
Walsh Baca City
Bent County Bent County
Las Animas Bent City
Boulder County Boulder County
Boulder Boulder City
Erie Boulder City 2 counties
Jamestown Boulder City
Lafayette Boulder City
1
EXHIBIT B
DocuSign Envelope ID: A97F0DF8-5247-480F-B55A-658D8BCBC744
Colorado Local Governments*
Government Name County Gov't Type
Multi-
County
Longmont Boulder City 2 counties
Louisville Boulder City
Lyons Boulder City
Nederland Boulder City
Superior Boulder City 2 counties
Ward Boulder City
Broomfield Broomfield City/County
Chaffee County Chaffee County
Buena Vista Chaffee City
Poncha Springs Chaffee City
Salida Chaffee City
Cheyenne County Cheyenne County
Cheyenne Wells Cheyenne City
Kit Carson Cheyenne City
Clear Creek County Clear Creek County
Central City Clear Creek City 2 counties
Empire Clear Creek City
Georgetown Clear Creek City
Idaho Springs Clear Creek City
Silver Plume Clear Creek City
Conejos County Conejos County
Antonito Conejos City
La Jara Conejos City
Manassa Conejos City
Romeo Conejos City
Sanford Conejos City
Costilla County Costilla County
Blanca Costilla City
San Luis Costilla City
Crowley County Crowley County
Crowley Crowley City
Olney Springs Crowley City
Ordway Crowley City
Sugar City Crowley City
Custer County Custer County
Silver Cliff Custer City
Westcliffe Custer City
Delta County Delta County
Cedaredge Delta City
Crawford Delta City
Delta Delta City
Hotchkiss Delta City
Orchard City Delta City
Paonia Delta City
2
EXHIBIT B
DocuSign Envelope ID: A97F0DF8-5247-480F-B55A-658D8BCBC744
Colorado Local Governments*
Government Name County Gov't Type
Multi-
County
Denver Denver City/County
Dolores County Dolores County
Dove Creek Dolores City
Rico Dolores City
Douglas County Douglas County
Aurora Douglas City 3 counties
Castle Pines Douglas City
Castle Rock Douglas City
Larkspur Douglas City
Littleton Douglas City 3 counties
Lone Tree Douglas City
Parker Douglas City
Eagle County Eagle County
Avon Eagle City
Basalt Eagle City 2 counties
Eagle Eagle City
Gypsum Eagle City
Minturn Eagle City
Red Cliff Eagle City
Vail Eagle City
El Paso County El Paso County
Calhan El Paso City
Colorado Springs El Paso City
Fountain El Paso City
Green Mountain Falls El Paso City 2 counties
Manitou Springs El Paso City
Monument El Paso City
Palmer Lake El Paso City
Ramah El Paso City
Elbert County Elbert County
Elizabeth Elbert City
Kiowa Elbert City
Simla Elbert City
Fremont County Fremont County
Brookside Fremont City
Cañon City Fremont City
Coal Creek Fremont City
Florence Fremont City
Rockvale Fremont City
Williamsburg Fremont City
Garfield County Garfield County
Carbondale Garfield City
Glenwood Springs Garfield City
New Castle Garfield City
3
EXHIBIT B
DocuSign Envelope ID: A97F0DF8-5247-480F-B55A-658D8BCBC744
Colorado Local Governments*
Government Name County Gov't Type
Multi-
County
Parachute Garfield City
Rifle Garfield City
Silt Garfield City
Gilpin County Gilpin County
Black Hawk Gilpin City
Central City Gilpin City 2 counties
Grand County Grand County
Fraser Grand City
Granby Grand City
Grand Lake Grand City
Hot Sulphur Springs Grand City
Kremmling Grand City
Winter Park Grand City
Gunnison County Gunnison County
Crested Butte Gunnison City
Gunnison Gunnison City
Marble Gunnison City
Mount Crested Butte Gunnison City
Pitkin Gunnison City
Hinsdale County Hinsdale County
Lake City Hinsdale City
Huerfano County Huerfano County
La Veta Huerfano City
Walsenburg Huerfano City
Jackson County Jackson County
Walden Jackson City
Jefferson County Jefferson County
Arvada Jefferson City 2 counties
Bow Mar Jefferson City 2 counties
Edgewater Jefferson City
Golden Jefferson City
Lakeside Jefferson City
Lakewood Jefferson City
Littleton Jefferson City 3 counties
Morrison Jefferson City
Mountain View Jefferson City
Superior Jefferson City 2 counties
Westminster Jefferson City 2 counties
Wheat Ridge Jefferson City
Kiowa County Kiowa County
Eads Kiowa City
Haswell Kiowa City
Sheridan Lake Kiowa City
Kit Carson County Kit Carson County
4
EXHIBIT B
DocuSign Envelope ID: A97F0DF8-5247-480F-B55A-658D8BCBC744
Colorado Local Governments*
Government Name County Gov't Type
Multi-
County
Bethune Kit Carson City
Burlington Kit Carson City
Flagler Kit Carson City
Seibert Kit Carson City
Stratton Kit Carson City
Vona Kit Carson City
La Plata County La Plata County
Bayfield La Plata City
Durango La Plata City
Ignacio La Plata City
Lake County Lake County
Leadville Lake City
Larimer County Larimer County
Berthoud Larimer City 2 counties
Estes Park Larimer City
Fort Collins Larimer City
Johnstown Larimer City 2 counties
Loveland Larimer City
Timnath Larimer City 2 counties
Wellington Larimer City
Windsor Larimer City 2 counties
Las Animas County Las Animas County
Aguilar Las Animas City
Branson Las Animas City
Cokedale Las Animas City
Kim Las Animas City
Starkville Las Animas City
Trinidad Las Animas City
Lincoln County Lincoln County
Arriba Lincoln City
Genoa Lincoln City
Hugo Lincoln City
Limon Lincoln City
Logan County Logan County
Crook Logan City
Fleming Logan City
Iliff Logan City
Merino Logan City
Peetz Logan City
Sterling Logan City
Mesa County Mesa County
Collbran Mesa City
De Beque Mesa City
Fruita Mesa City
5
EXHIBIT B
DocuSign Envelope ID: A97F0DF8-5247-480F-B55A-658D8BCBC744
Colorado Local Governments*
Government Name County Gov't Type
Multi-
County
Grand Junction Mesa City
Palisade Mesa City
Mineral County Mineral County
City of Creede Mineral City
Moffat County Moffat County
Craig Moffat City
Dinosaur Moffat City
Montezuma County Montezuma County
Cortez Montezuma City
Dolores Montezuma City
Mancos Montezuma City
Montrose County Montrose County
Montrose Montrose City
Naturita Montrose City
Nucla Montrose City
Olathe Montrose City
Morgan County Morgan County
Brush Morgan City
Fort Morgan Morgan City
Hillrose Morgan City
Log Lane Village Morgan City
Wiggins Morgan City
Otero County Otero County
Cheraw Otero City
Fowler Otero City
La Junta Otero City
Manzanola Otero City
Rocky Ford Otero City
Swink Otero City
Ouray County Ouray County
Ouray Ouray City
Ridgway Ouray City
Park County Park County
Alma Park City
Fairplay Park City
Phillips County Phillips County
Haxtun Phillips City
Holyoke Phillips City
Paoli Phillips City
Pitkin County Pitkin County
Aspen Pitkin City
Basalt Pitkin City 2 counties
Snowmass Village Pitkin City
Prowers County Prowers County
6
EXHIBIT B
DocuSign Envelope ID: A97F0DF8-5247-480F-B55A-658D8BCBC744
Colorado Local Governments*
Government Name County Gov't Type
Multi-
County
Granada Prowers City
Hartman Prowers City
Holly Prowers City
Lamar Prowers City
Wiley Prowers City
Pueblo County Pueblo County
Boone Pueblo City
Pueblo Pueblo City
Rye Pueblo City
Rio Blanco County Rio Blanco County
Meeker Rio Blanco City
Rangely Rio Blanco City
Rio Grande County Rio Grande County
Center Rio Grande City 2 counties
Del Norte Rio Grande City
Monte Vista Rio Grande City
South Fork Rio Grande City
Routt County Routt County
Hayden Routt City
Oak Creek Routt City
Steamboat Springs Routt City
Yampa Routt City
Saguache County Saguache County
Bonanza Saguache City
Center Saguache City 2 counties
Crestone Saguache City
Moffat Saguache City
Saguache Saguache City
San Juan County San Juan County
Silverton San Juan City
San Miguel County San Miguel County
Mountain Village San Miguel City
Norwood San Miguel City
Ophir San Miguel City
Sawpit San Miguel City
Telluride San Miguel City
Sedgwick County Sedgwick County
Julesburg Sedgwick City
Ovid Sedgwick City
Sedgwick Sedgwick City
Summit County Summit County
Blue River Summit City
Breckenridge Summit City
Dillon Summit City
7
EXHIBIT B
DocuSign Envelope ID: A97F0DF8-5247-480F-B55A-658D8BCBC744
Colorado Local Governments*
Government Name County Gov't Type
Multi-
County
Frisco Summit City
Montezuma Summit City
Silverthorne Summit City
Teller County Teller County
Cripple Creek Teller City
Green Mountain Falls Teller City 2 counties
Victor Teller City
Woodland Park Teller City
Washington County Washington County
Akron Washington City
Otis Washington City
Weld County Weld County
Ault Weld City
Berthoud Weld City 2 counties
Brighton Weld City 2 counties
Dacono Weld City
Eaton Weld City
Erie Weld City 2 counties
Evans Weld City
Firestone Weld City
Fort Lupton Weld City
Frederick Weld City
Garden City Weld City
Gilcrest Weld City
Greeley Weld City
Grover Weld City
Hudson Weld City
Johnstown Weld City 2 counties
Keenesburg Weld City
Kersey Weld City
La Salle Weld City
Lochbuie Weld City 2 counties
Longmont Weld City 2 counties
Mead Weld City
Milliken Weld City
Northglenn Weld City 2 counties
Nunn Weld City
Pierce Weld City
Platteville Weld City
Raymer (New Raymer)Weld City
Severance Weld City
Thornton Weld City 2 counties
Timnath Weld City 2 counties
Windsor Weld City 2 counties
8
EXHIBIT B
DocuSign Envelope ID: A97F0DF8-5247-480F-B55A-658D8BCBC744
Colorado Local Governments*
Government Name County Gov't Type
Multi-
County
Yuma County Yuma County
Eckley Yuma City
Wray Yuma City
Yuma Yuma City
*This list includes all 64 Colorado counties and all 271 municipalities listed in the 2019 Census. Cities located
in multiple counties are listed under each corresponding county subheading. City and County of Denver and
City and County of Broomfield are counted in both the city and county totals. The City of Carbonate is not
included in this list, as there was no population in the 2019 Census data.
9
This list will be reconciled as necessary to be consistent with the terms of Settlement(s) with Opioid Settling
Defendant(s)
EXHIBIT B
DocuSign Envelope ID: A97F0DF8-5247-480F-B55A-658D8BCBC744
Exhibit C
DocuSign Envelope ID: A97F0DF8-5247-480F-B55A-658D8BCBC744
EXHIBIT C
DocuSign Envelope ID: A97F0DF8-5247-480F-B55A-658D8BCBC744
Exhibit D
DocuSign Envelope ID: A97F0DF8-5247-480F-B55A-658D8BCBC744
Exhibit D - Allocations to Colorado County Areas
County Percentage of LG Share
Adams 9.4247%
Alamosa 0.5081%
Arapahoe 10.8071%
Archuleta 0.1370%
Baca 0.0592%
Bent 0.1133%
Boulder 5.7936%
Broomfield 1.0014%
Chaffee 0.3604%
Cheyenne 0.0159%
Clear Creek 0.1380%
Conejos 0.2108%
Costilla 0.0552%
Crowley 0.0934%
Custer 0.0412%
Delta 0.5440%
Denver 15.0042%
Dolores 0.0352%
Douglas 3.6696%
Eagle 0.6187%
El Paso 11.9897%
Elbert 0.2804%
Fremont 0.9937%
Garfield 0.8376%
Gilpin 0.0561%
Grand 0.2037%
Gunnison 0.1913%
Hinsdale 0.0112%
Huerfano 0.2505%
Jackson 0.0310%
Jefferson 10.5173%
Kiowa 0.0142%
Kit Carson 0.0940%
La Plata 0.8127%
Lake 0.0990%
Larimer 6.5211%
Las Animas 0.6304%
Lincoln 0.0819%
Logan 0.3815%
Mesa 2.8911%
Mineral 0.0039%
Moffat 0.2326%
Montezuma 0.4429%
Page 1 EXHIBIT D
DocuSign Envelope ID: A97F0DF8-5247-480F-B55A-658D8BCBC744
Montrose 0.5695%
Morgan 0.4677%
Otero 0.4486%
Ouray 0.0535%
Park 0.1674%
Phillips 0.0714%
Pitkin 0.1747%
Prowers 0.1727%
Pueblo 5.6757%
Rio Blanco 0.1013%
Rio Grande 0.2526%
Routt 0.3837%
Saguache 0.0666%
San Juan 0.0097%
San Miguel 0.1005%
Sedgwick 0.0618%
Summit 0.3761%
Teller 0.6219%
Washington 0.0357%
Weld 3.8908%
Yuma 0.0992%
TOTAL 100.0000%
Page 2 EXHIBIT D
DocuSign Envelope ID: A97F0DF8-5247-480F-B55A-658D8BCBC744
Exhibit E
DocuSign Envelope ID: A97F0DF8-5247-480F-B55A-658D8BCBC744
Government Name
Intracounty
Share
Adams County 68.3372%
Arvada (2 Counties)0.2632%
Aurora (3 Counties)4.6336%
Bennett (2 Counties)0.1670%
Brighton (2 Counties)1.4527%
Commerce City 4.7314%
Federal Heights 1.1457%
Lochbuie (2 Counties)0.0001%
Northglenn (2 Counties)2.0913%
Thornton (2 Counties)10.6435%
Westminster (2 Counties)6.5342%
Alamosa County 85.3075%
Alamosa 14.6818%
Hooper 0.0108%
Arapahoe County 42.7003%
Aurora (3 Counties)35.5997%
Bennett (2 Counties)0.0324%
Bow Mar (2 Counties)0.0159%
Centennial 0.4411%
Cherry Hills Village 0.6685%
Columbine Valley 0.1601%
Deer Trail 0.0003%
Englewood 5.5850%
Foxfield 0.0372%
Glendale 1.2289%
Greenwood Village 2.8305%
Littleton (3 Counties)8.5654%
Sheridan 2.1347%
Archuleta County 90.0864%
Pagosa Springs 9.9136%
Baca County 85.9800%
Campo 2.4443%
Pritchett 1.5680%
Springfield 7.0100%
Exhibit E - Intracounty Allocations1,2
The below chart depicts the default percentage that each Local Government will receive from the LG
Share amount attributed to its County Area, as described in Section (E)(3) of the MOU. The chart
assumes full participation by all Local Governments
Page 1 EXHIBIT E
DocuSign Envelope ID: A97F0DF8-5247-480F-B55A-658D8BCBC744
Government Name
Intracounty
Share
Two Buttes 0.4766%
Vilas 0.9070%
Walsh 1.6141%
Bent County 80.9608%
Las Animas 19.0392%
Boulder County 47.6311%
Boulder 31.7629%
Erie (2 Counties)0.3634%
Jamestown 0.0086%
Lafayette 3.3203%
Longmont (2 Counties)14.6833%
Louisville 1.4455%
Lyons 0.5916%
Nederland 0.1646%
Superior (2 Counties)0.0258%
Ward 0.0030%
Broomfield County/City 100.0000%
Chaffee County 74.8440%
Buena Vista 5.8841%
Poncha Springs 4.2369%
Salida 15.0350%
Cheyenne County 66.8002%
Cheyenne Wells 0.8586%
Kit Carson 32.3412%
Clear Creek County 92.2164%
Central City (2 Counties)0.0000%
Empire 0.3364%
Georgetown 1.9063%
Idaho Springs 4.7625%
Silver Plume 0.7784%
Conejos County 77.1204%
Antonito 4.6338%
La Jara 2.4313%
Manassa 1.0062%
Romeo 2.4270%
Sanford 12.3812%
Page 2 EXHIBIT E
DocuSign Envelope ID: A97F0DF8-5247-480F-B55A-658D8BCBC744
Government Name
Intracounty
Share
Costilla County 97.3454%
Blanca 1.2036%
San Luis 1.4509%
Crowley County 80.7081%
Crowley 4.3597%
Olney Springs 8.3683%
Ordway 0.1853%
Sugar City 6.3786%
Custer County 96.6858%
Silver Cliff 0.7954%
Westcliffe 2.5188%
Delta County 76.3512%
Cedaredge 3.6221%
Crawford 0.4938%
Delta 16.2658%
Hotchkiss 1.0963%
Orchard City 0.1473%
Paonia 2.0236%
Denver County/City 100.0000%
Dolores County 76.3307%
Dove Creek 17.3127%
Rico 6.3566%
Douglas County 71.8404%
Aurora (3 Counties)0.2099%
Castle Pines 0.2007%
Castle Rock 13.5204%
Larkspur 0.0856%
Littleton (3 Counties)0.0156%
Lone Tree 5.2786%
Parker 8.8487%
Eagle County 60.8236%
Avon 7.6631%
Basalt (2 Counties)2.2311%
Eagle 3.1376%
Gypsum 1.7469%
Minturn 0.7771%
Page 3 EXHIBIT E
DocuSign Envelope ID: A97F0DF8-5247-480F-B55A-658D8BCBC744
Government Name
Intracounty
Share
Red Cliff 0.0957%
Vail 23.5250%
El Paso County 18.4181%
Calhan 0.0228%
Colorado Springs 80.1161%
Fountain 0.9892%
Green Mountain Falls (2 Counties)0.0149%
Manitou Springs 0.2411%
Monument 0.1492%
Palmer Lake 0.0455%
Ramah 0.0033%
Elbert County 86.5840%
Elizabeth 10.2633%
Kiowa 1.5455%
Simla 1.6072%
Fremont County 60.7882%
Brookside 0.0348%
Cañon City 30.9017%
Coal Creek 0.0476%
Florence 8.0681%
Rockvale 0.0687%
Williamsburg 0.0907%
Garfield County 76.3371%
Carbondale 2.4698%
Glenwood Springs 11.8141%
New Castle 1.4295%
Parachute 1.0653%
Rifle 5.2733%
Silt 1.6110%
Gilpin County 46.8613%
Black Hawk 46.3909%
Central City (2 Counties)6.7478%
Grand County 80.1046%
Fraser 2.4903%
Granby 5.4008%
Grand Lake 0.3174%
Hot Sulphur Springs 0.1431%
Kremmling 2.9284%
Page 4 EXHIBIT E
DocuSign Envelope ID: A97F0DF8-5247-480F-B55A-658D8BCBC744
Government Name
Intracounty
Share
Winter Park 8.6154%
Gunnison County 88.9185%
Crested Butte 2.3562%
Gunnison 5.9501%
Marble 0.1714%
Mount Crested Butte 2.5657%
Pitkin 0.0381%
Hinsdale County 76.0940%
Lake City 23.9060%
Huerfano County 68.2709%
La Veta 11.0719%
Walsenburg 20.6572%
Jackson County 61.5339%
Walden 38.4661%
Jefferson County 58.2140%
Arvada (2 Counties)11.9733%
Bow Mar (2 Counties)0.0087%
Edgewater 0.6604%
Golden 3.4815%
Lakeside 0.0030%
Lakewood 15.9399%
Littleton (3 Counties)0.6176%
Morrison 0.2205%
Mountain View 0.1344%
Superior (2 Counties)0.0000%
Westminster (2 Counties)5.4779%
Wheat Ridge 3.2689%
Kiowa County 93.2138%
Eads 5.3777%
Haswell 0.6402%
Sheridan Lake 0.7682%
Kit Carson County 86.3178%
Bethune 0.1841%
Burlington 12.0640%
Flagler 0.4264%
Seibert 0.0291%
Stratton 0.9012%
Page 5 EXHIBIT E
DocuSign Envelope ID: A97F0DF8-5247-480F-B55A-658D8BCBC744
Government Name
Intracounty
Share
Vona 0.0775%
La Plata County 66.8874%
Bayfield 1.6292%
Durango 29.2985%
Ignacio 2.1849%
Lake County 73.4523%
Leadville 26.5477%
Larimer County 56.0589%
Berthoud (2 Counties)0.4139%
Estes Park 0.3502%
Fort Collins 18.5702%
Johnstown (2 Counties)0.0711%
Loveland 23.4493%
Timnath (2 Counties)0.2964%
Wellington 0.3653%
Windsor (2 Counties)0.4248%
Las Animas County 77.8076%
Aguilar 0.0751%
Branson 0.0101%
Cokedale 0.0188%
Kim 0.0101%
Starkville 0.0087%
Trinidad 22.0696%
Lincoln County 91.3222%
Arriba 0.3444%
Genoa 0.2222%
Hugo 1.4778%
Limon 6.6333%
Logan County 72.7982%
Crook 0.0931%
Fleming 0.3413%
Iliff 0.0095%
Merino 0.4702%
Peetz 0.2029%
Sterling 26.0848%
Mesa County 60.8549%
Collbran 0.0920%
Page 6 EXHIBIT E
DocuSign Envelope ID: A97F0DF8-5247-480F-B55A-658D8BCBC744
Government Name
Intracounty
Share
De Beque 0.0123%
Fruita 1.6696%
Grand Junction 37.1505%
Palisade 0.2208%
Mineral County 87.6744%
City of Creede 12.3256%
Moffat County 91.7981%
Craig 8.1862%
Dinosaur 0.0157%
Montezuma County 79.6682%
Cortez 18.6459%
Dolores 0.6106%
Mancos 1.0753%
Montrose County 92.8648%
Montrose 6.5980%
Naturita 0.1551%
Nucla 0.0703%
Olathe 0.3118%
Morgan County 61.6991%
Brush 8.5522%
Fort Morgan 27.8214%
Hillrose 0.1986%
Log Lane Village 0.6424%
Wiggins 1.0863%
Otero County 60.8168%
Cheraw 0.1888%
Fowler 1.0413%
La Junta 25.9225%
Manzanola 0.6983%
Rocky Ford 8.8215%
Swink 2.5109%
Ouray County 76.0810%
Ouray 17.6541%
Ridgway 6.2649%
Park County 96.3983%
Alma 0.7780%
Page 7 EXHIBIT E
DocuSign Envelope ID: A97F0DF8-5247-480F-B55A-658D8BCBC744
Government Name
Intracounty
Share
Fairplay 2.8237%
Phillips County 52.3463%
Haxtun 13.9505%
Holyoke 33.1803%
Paoli 0.5228%
Pitkin County 47.1379%
Aspen 42.0707%
Basalt (2 Counties)1.1156%
Snowmass Village 9.6757%
Prowers County 70.4524%
Granada 0.9965%
Hartman 0.3164%
Holly 4.9826%
Lamar 21.5860%
Wiley 1.6661%
Pueblo County 54.6622%
Boone 0.0019%
Pueblo 45.3350%
Rye 0.0008%
Rio Blanco County 78.2831%
Meeker 9.1326%
Rangely 12.5843%
Rio Grande County 68.0724%
Center (2 Counties)0.7713%
Del Norte 6.7762%
Monte Vista 20.4513%
South Fork 3.9288%
Routt County 58.5353%
Hayden 1.0679%
Oak Creek 0.6360%
Steamboat Springs 39.4499%
Yampa 0.3109%
Saguache County 92.8796%
Bonanza 0.1367%
Center (2 Counties)6.3687%
Crestone 0.0137%
Page 8 EXHIBIT E
DocuSign Envelope ID: A97F0DF8-5247-480F-B55A-658D8BCBC744
Government Name
Intracounty
Share
Moffat 0.3553%
Saguache 0.2460%
San Juan County 87.0423%
Silverton 12.9577%
San Miguel County 48.7493%
Mountain Village 25.7930%
Norwood 0.4078%
Ophir 0.0816%
Sawpit 0.0272%
Telluride 24.9411%
Sedgwick County 98.7331%
Julesburg 0.3830%
Ovid 0.0295%
Sedgwick 0.8544%
Summit County 57.0567%
Blue River 0.5011%
Breckenridge 26.1112%
Dillon 4.1421%
Frisco 6.5096%
Montezuma 0.0169%
Silverthorne 5.6623%
Teller County 66.1557%
Cripple Creek 17.2992%
Green Mountain Falls (2 Counties)0.0322%
Victor 3.1685%
Woodland Park 13.3445%
Washington County 99.1320%
Akron 0.7659%
Otis 0.1021%
Weld County 51.9387%
Ault 0.3202%
Berthoud (2 Counties)0.0061%
Brighton (2 Counties)0.0927%
Dacono 0.6104%
Eaton 0.4573%
Erie (2 Counties)0.8591%
Evans 4.5121%
Page 9 EXHIBIT E
DocuSign Envelope ID: A97F0DF8-5247-480F-B55A-658D8BCBC744
Government Name
Intracounty
Share
Firestone 1.4648%
Fort Lupton 0.8502%
Frederick 1.2228%
Garden City 0.1514%
Gilcrest 0.1580%
Greeley 30.6922%
Grover 0.0852%
Hudson 0.0066%
Johnstown (2 Counties)1.5416%
Keenesburg 0.0215%
Kersey 0.1378%
La Salle 0.4128%
Lochbuie (2 Counties)0.4004%
Longmont (2 Counties)0.0154%
Mead 0.0941%
Milliken 1.5373%
Northglenn (2 Counties)0.0030%
Nunn 0.2558%
Pierce 0.0948%
Platteville 0.3712%
Raymer (New Raymer)0.0597%
Severance 0.0403%
Thornton (2 Counties)0.0000%
Timnath (2 Counties)0.0000%
Windsor (2 Counties)1.5865%
Yuma County 75.5598%
Eckley 2.5422%
Wray 10.2148%
Yuma 11.6832%
Page 10
1 These allocations are based on the allocation model used in the Negotiation Class website. The allocation model is the product of prolonged and intensive
research, analysis, and discussion by and among members of the court-appointed Plaintiffs’ Executive Committee and Settlement Committee and their
retained public health and health economics experts, as well as a series of meetings with scores of cities, counties and subdivisions. Additional information
about the allocation model is available on the Negotiation Class website.
The allocations in the Negotiation Class website use two different methodologies:
County-Level Allocation
The allocation model uses three factors, based on reliable, detailed, and objective data collected and reported by the federal government, to determine the
share of a settlement fund that each county will receive. The three factors are: (1) the amount of opioids shipped to the county, (2) the number of opioid
deaths in that county, and (3) the number of people who suffer opioid use disorder in that county.
County/Municipal-Level Allocation
The county/municipal-level allocation is a default allocation to be used if another agreement is not reached between the county and its constituent cities.
The formula uses U.S. Census Bureau data on local government spending. This data covers cities and counties for 98% of the U.S. population. If a jurisdiction
lacked this data, it was extrapolated based on available data.
2 The municipalities of Bow Mar, Johnstown, and Timnath were not reflected as being in multiple counties in the Negotiation Class website. The estimated
allocations to those cities are based on the same methodology used in the website, in consultation with the expert. For cities in multiple counties, please
see each county in which that city lies.
EXHIBIT E
DocuSign Envelope ID: A97F0DF8-5247-480F-B55A-658D8BCBC744
Exhibit F
DocuSign Envelope ID: A97F0DF8-5247-480F-B55A-658D8BCBC744
Region Number Region Description Total State Share
1 Northwest 0.9522%
2 Larimer 6.5211%
3 Weld 3.8908%
4 Logan 1.5896%
5 North Central 2.1061%
6 Boulder 5.7936%
7 Broomfield 1.0014%
8 Adams 9.4247%
9 Arapahoe 10.8071%
10 Jefferson 10.7114%
11 Denver 15.0042%
12 Douglas 3.6696%
13 Mesa 2.8911%
14 Southwest 1.4700%
15 Central 1.5627%
16 El Paso/Teller 12.6116%
17 Southwest Corner 1.4375%
18 South Central 1.0973%
19 Southeast 7.4580%
Total 100.0000%
Regional Allocations
EXHIBIT F
DocuSign Envelope ID: A97F0DF8-5247-480F-B55A-658D8BCBC744
Exhibit G
DocuSign Envelope ID: A97F0DF8-5247-480F-B55A-658D8BCBC744
Regional Governance Models
A. Membership Structure
Single-County Regions
1. Voting Members (Recommended List: Participating Local Governments to Decide)
• 1 or 2 representatives appointed by the county (can be commissioners)
• 1 representative appointed from the public health department
• 1 representative from the county human services department
• 1 representative appointed from law enforcement within region (sheriff, police,
local city or town district attorney, etc.)
• 1 representative appointed from a municipal or county court system within region
• 1-3 representatives (total) appointed by the cities within the county (or other city
or cities agreed upon) (can be councilmembers and mayors)
• Such other representatives as participating counties/cities agree on (not to include
providers who may be recipients of funds)
2. Non-Voting Members (Optional but strongly encouraged)
• Representatives from behavioral health providers
• Representatives from health care providers
• Recovery/treatment experts
• Other county or city representatives
• A representative from the Attorney General’s Office
• Community representative(s), preferably those with lived experience with the
opioid crisis
• Harm reduction experts
Multi-County Regions
1. Voting Members (Recommended List: Participating Local Governments to Decide)
• 1 representative appointed by each county (can be commissioners)
• 1 representative appointed by a rotating city within each county (or other city
agreed upon) (can be councilmembers and mayors)
• 1 representative from each public health department within the region
• 1 representative from a county human services department
• At least 1 representative appointed from law enforcement within region (sheriff,
police, local city or town district attorney, etc.)
• 1 representative from a municipal or county court system within region
• Such other representatives as participating counties/cities agree on (not to include
providers who may be recipients of funds)
2. Non-Voting Members (Optional)
• Representatives from behavioral health providers
EXHIBIT G
DocuSign Envelope ID: A97F0DF8-5247-480F-B55A-658D8BCBC744
• Representatives from health care providers
• Recovery/treatment experts
• Other county or city representatives
• A representative from the Attorney General’s Office
• Community representative(s), preferably those with lived experience with the
opioid crisis.
• Harm reduction experts
Single-County Single-City Regions (Denver & Broomfield)
1. Voting Members (Recommended List: Participating Local Government to Decide)1
• 1 representative appointed by the city and county
• 1 representative appointed from the public health department
• 1 representative from the county human services department
• 1 representative appointed from law enforcement within region (sheriff, police,
district attorney, etc.)
• 1 representative appointed from a municipal or county court system within region
• Such other representatives as participating counties/cities agree on (not to include
providers who may be recipients of funds)
2. Non-Voting Members (Optional)
• Representatives from behavioral health providers
• Representatives from health care providers
• Recovery/treatment experts
• Other county or city representatives
• A representative from the Attorney General’s Office
• Community representative(s), preferably those with lived experience with the
opioid crisis.
• Harm reduction experts
B. Member Terms
• Regions may establish terms of appointment for members. Appointment terms
may be staggered.
C. Procedures
• Regions will be governed by an intergovernmental agreement (“IGA”) or
memorandum of understanding (“MOU”).
• Regions may adopt the Model Colorado Regional Opioid Intergovernmental
Agreement, attached here as Exhibit G-1, in its entirety or alter or amend it as
they deem appropriate.
1 In Denver, the Mayor shall make voting member appointments to the Regional Council. In Broomfield, the City
and County Manager shall make voting member appointments to the Regional Council.
EXHIBIT G
DocuSign Envelope ID: A97F0DF8-5247-480F-B55A-658D8BCBC744
• Regions may establish their own procedures through adoption of bylaws (model
bylaws to be made available).
• Meetings of regional board/committee shall be open to the public and comply
with the Colorado Open Meetings Law (including requirement to keep minutes).
D. Financial Responsibility/Controls
• A local government entity shall nominate and designate a fiscal agent for the
Region.
• A Regional fiscal agent must be appointed by the Regional Council on an annual
basis. A Regional fiscal agent may serve as long as the Regional Council
determines is appropriate, including the length of any Settlement that
contemplates the distribution of Opioid Funds within Colorado. However, the
Regional fiscal agent also can change over time.
• Regional fiscal agents must be a board of county commissioners or a city or town
council or executive department, such as a department of finance.
• Yearly reporting by fiscal agent (using standard form) to the Abatement Council.
• All documents subject to CORA.
E. Conflicts of Interest
• Voting members shall abide by the conflict-of-interest rules applicable to local
government officials under state law.
F. Ethics Laws
• Voting members shall abide by applicable state or local ethics laws, as
appropriate.
G. Authority
• The Regional Council for each region shall have authority to decide how funds
allocated to the region shall be distributed in accordance with the Colorado MOU
and shall direct the fiscal agent accordingly.
• Any necessary contracts will be entered into by the fiscal agent, subject to
approval by the Regional Council.
H. Legal Status
• The region shall not be considered a separate legal entity, unless the Participating
Local Governments decide, through an IGA, to create a separate governmental
entity.
EXHIBIT G
DocuSign Envelope ID: A97F0DF8-5247-480F-B55A-658D8BCBC744
Exhibit G-1
DocuSign Envelope ID: A97F0DF8-5247-480F-B55A-658D8BCBC744
MODEL COLORADO REGIONAL OPIOID
INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT 2
THIS MODEL COLORADO REGIONAL OPIOID INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT (the “Regional
Agreement”) is made between _________________, a Participating Local Government, as defined in the
Colorado MOU, in the __________________ Region (“____________”) and ______________________, a
Participating Local Government in the ___________ Region, (“_____________”), individually herein a
“Regional PLG” and collectively the “Regional PLGs.””
RECITALS
WHEREAS, the State of Colorado and Participating Local Governments executed the Colorado
Opioids Summary Memorandum of Understanding on _______ 2021 (the “Colorado MOU”), establishing
the manner in which Opioid Funds shall be divided and distributed within the State of Colorado;
WHEREAS, the Regional Agreement assumes and incorporates the definitions and provisions
contained in the Colorado MOU, and the Regional Agreement shall be construed in conformity with the
Colorado MOU3;
WHEREAS, all Opioid Funds, regardless of allocation, shall be used for Approved Purposes;
WHEREAS, Participating Local Governments shall organize themselves into Regions, as further
depicted in Exhibit E to the Colorado MOU;
2 This Model Regional Agreement is meant to serve as an example for the various Regions and to facilitate the
flow of Opioid Funds to their intended purposes. Regions are free to adopt this Regional Agreement in its entirety
or alter or amend it as they deem appropriate.
3 When drafting agreements like this Regional Agreement, Regional PLGs should be conscious of the definitions
used therein so as not to confuse such definitions with those used in the Colorado MOU. The Definitions in the
Colorado MOU shall supersede any definitions used by Regional PLGs in a Regional Agreement.
EXHIBIT G-1
DocuSign Envelope ID: A97F0DF8-5247-480F-B55A-658D8BCBC744
WHEREAS, Regions may consist of Single-County Regions, Multi-County Regions, or Single County-
Single City Regions (Denver and Broomfield).
WHEREAS, there shall be a 60% direct allocation of Opioid Funds to Regions through a Regional
Share;
WHEREAS, each Region shall be eligible to receive a Regional Share according to Exhibit C to the
Colorado MOU;
WHEREAS, the Colorado MOU establishes the procedures by which each Region shall be entitled
to Opioid Funds from the Abatement Council and administer its Regional Share allocation;
WHEREAS, the procedures established by the Colorado MOU include a requirement that each
Region shall create its own Regional Council;
WHEREAS, all aspects of the creation, administration, and operation of the Regional Council
shall proceed in accordance with the provisions of the Colorado MOU;
WHEREAS, each such Regional Council shall designate a fiscal agent from a county or municipal
government within that Region;
WHEREAS, each such Regional Council shall submit a two-year plan to the Abatement Council
that identifies the Approved Purposes for which the requested funds will be used, and the Regional
Council’s fiscal agent shall provide data and a certification to the Abatement Council regarding
compliance with its two-year plan on an annual basis;
WHEREAS, the Regional Agreement pertains to the procedures for the Regional PLGs to
establish a Regional Council, designate a fiscal agent, and request and administer Opioid Funds in a
manner consistent with the Colorado MOU;
EXHIBIT G-1
DocuSign Envelope ID: A97F0DF8-5247-480F-B55A-658D8BCBC744
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements hereinafter set
forth and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the
Regional PLGs incorporate the recitals set forth above and agree as follows:
1. DEFINITIONS. The defined terms used in this Regional Agreement shall have the same meanings as
in the Colorado MOU4. Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined within the Regional
Agreement or in the Colorado MOU shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the body of the
Regional Agreement.
2. OBLIGATIONS OF THE REGIONAL PLGS. The Regional PLGs shall perform their respective
obligations as set forth in the Regional Agreement, the Colorado MOU and the accompanying exhibits
to the Colorado MOU and incorporated herein by reference.
3. REGIONAL COUNCIL.
3.1. Purpose: In accordance with the Colorado MOU, a Regional Council, consisting of
representatives appointed by the Regional PLGs, shall be created to oversee the procedures by
which a Region may request Opioid Funds from the Abatement Council and the procedures by
which the allocation of its Region’s Share of Opioid Funds are administered.
3.2. Membership: The Regional Council of a Multi-County or Single County Region shall
consist of the following:
a. Multi-County Region:
(i) Voting Members. Voting Members shall be appointed by the
Regional PLGs. The Regional PLGs shall collaborate to appoint
Regional Council members and to the extent practicable, Voting
Members shall be selected from different counties and cities. No
single county or city should dominate the make-up of the Regional
Council. Voting Members shall be selected as follows:
(1) 1 representative appointed by each county (can be
commissioners).
(2) 1 representative appointed from a rotating city within each
county (or other city agreed upon) (can be councilmembers
and mayors). A rotating city member shall be selected by
majority vote of the cities within each county who do not
have a Voting Member currently sitting on the Regional
4 See FN 2, supra.
EXHIBIT G-1
DocuSign Envelope ID: A97F0DF8-5247-480F-B55A-658D8BCBC744
Council.
(3) 1 representative from each public health department within
the region.
(4) 1 representative from a county human services department.
(5) At least 1 representative appointed from law enforcement
within the region (sheriff, police, local city or town district
attorney, etc.).
(6) 1 representative from a municipal or county court system
within the region.
b. Single-County Region:
(i) Voting Members. Voting Members shall be appointed by the
Regional PLGs. The Regional PLGs shall collaborate to appoint
Regional Council members and to the extent practicable, Voting
Members shall be selected from different cities within the region.
No single city should dominate the make-up of the Regional
Council. Voting Members shall be selected as follows:
(1) 1 or 2 representatives appointed by the county (can be
commissioners)
(2) 1 representative appointed from the public health
department
(3) 1 representative from the county human services
department
(4) 1 representative appointed from law enforcement within
region (sheriff, police, local city or town district attorney,
etc.)
(5) 1 representative appointed from a municipal or county
court system within region
(6) 1-3 representatives (total) appointed by rotating cities
within the county (or other city or cities agreed upon) (can
be councilmembers and mayors). Rotating city members
shall be selected by majority vote of the cities who do not
have a Voting Member currently sitting on the Regional
Council.
(7) Such other representatives as participating counties/cities
agree on (not to include providers who may be recipients of
EXHIBIT G-1
DocuSign Envelope ID: A97F0DF8-5247-480F-B55A-658D8BCBC744
funds)
c. Non-Voting Members. For both Multi-County and Single County
Regions, Non-Voting Members are optional but are strongly encouraged.
Non-voting members shall serve in an advisory capacity. Any Non-Voting
Members shall be appointed by the Regional PLGs and may be comprised
of all or some of the following, not to include potential recipients of funds:
(i) Representatives from behavioral health providers.
(ii) Representatives from health care providers.
(iii) Recovery/treatment experts.
(iv) Other county or city representatives.
(v) A representative from the Attorney General’s Office.
(vi) Community representative(s), preferably those with lived
experience with the opioid crisis.
(vii) Harm reduction experts.
d. Acting Chair: The Voting Members for both Multi-County and Single-
County Regions shall appoint one member to serve as Acting Chair of the
Regional Council. The Acting Chair’s primary responsibilities shall be to
schedule periodic meetings and votes of the Regional Council as needed
and to serve as the point of contact for disputes within the Region. The
Acting Chair must be either a Member from a county within a Region,
such as a county commissioner or their designee, or a Member from a city
or town within a Region, such as a mayor or city or town council member
or their designee.
e. Non-Participation: A Local Government that chooses not to become a
Participating Local Government in the Colorado MOU shall not receive
any Opioid Funds from the Regional Share or participate in the Regional
Council.
f. Terms: The Regional Council shall be established within ninety (90)
days of the first Settlement being entered by a court of competent
jurisdiction, including any bankruptcy court. In order to do so, within sixty
(60) days of the first Settlement being entered, CCI and CML shall jointly
recommend six (6) Voting Members, and so long as such
recommendations comply with the terms of Section 3.2 (a) or (b), the
Regional Council shall consist of CCI/CML’s recommended Members for
EXHIBIT G-1
DocuSign Envelope ID: A97F0DF8-5247-480F-B55A-658D8BCBC744
an initial term not to exceed one year.5 Thereafter, Voting Members shall
be appointed in accordance with Section 3.2 (a) or (b) and shall serve two-
year terms. Following the expiration of that two-year term, the Regional
PLGs, working in concert, shall reappoint that Voting Member, or appoint
a new Voting Member according to Section 3.2 (a) or (b).
(i) If a Voting Member resigns or is otherwise removed from the
Regional Council prior to the expiration of their term, a replacement
Voting Member shall be appointed within sixty (60) days in
accordance with Section 3.2 (a) or (b) to serve the remainder of the
term. If the Regional PLGs are unable to fill a Voting Member
vacancy within sixty (60) days, the existing Voting Members of the
Regional Council at the time of the vacancy shall work collectively
to appoint a replacement Voting Member in accordance with
Section 3.2 (a) or (b). At the end of his or her term, the individual
serving as that replacement Voting Member may be reappointed by
the Regional PLGs to serve a full term consistent with this Section.
(ii) The purpose of the two-year term is to allow Regional PLGs an
increased opportunity to serve on the Regional Council. However,
Regional Council members who have already served on the
Regional Council may be appointed more than once and may serve
consecutive terms if appointed to do so by the Regional Council.
3.3. Duties: The Regional Council is primarily responsible for engaging with the Abatement
Council on behalf of its Region and following the procedures outlined in the Colorado MOU for
requesting Opioid Funds from the Regional Share, which shall include developing 2-year plans,
amending those plans as appropriate, and providing the Abatement Council with data through its
fiscal agent regarding Opioid Fund expenditures. Upon request from the Abatement Council, the
Regional Council may also be subject to an accounting from the Abatement Council.
3.4. Governance: A Regional Council may establish its own procedures through adoption of
bylaws if needed. Any governing documents must be consistent with the other provisions in this
section and the Colorado MOU.
3.5. Authority: The terms of the Colorado MOU control the authority of a Regional Council
and a Regional Council shall not stray outside the bounds of the authority and power vested by
the Colorado MOU. Should a Regional Council require legal assistance in determining its authority,
5 Local Governments within Multi-County or Single County Regions may decide to select initial Voting Members of
the Regional Council between themselves and without CCI and CML involvement. However, the Regional Council
must be established within ninety (90) days of the first Settlement being entered by a court of competent
jurisdiction, including any bankruptcy court.
EXHIBIT G-1
DocuSign Envelope ID: A97F0DF8-5247-480F-B55A-658D8BCBC744
it may seek guidance from the legal counsel of the county or municipal government of the
Regional Council’s fiscal agent at the time the issue arises.
3.6. Collaboration: The Regional Council shall facilitate collaboration between the State,
Participating Local Governments within its Region, the Abatement Council, and other
stakeholders within its Region for the purposes of sharing data, outcomes, strategies, and other
relevant information related to abating the opioid crisis in Colorado.
3.7. Transparency: The Regional Council shall operate with all reasonable transparency and
abide by all Colorado laws relating to open records and meetings. To the extent the Abatement
Council requests outcome-related data from the Regional Council, the Regional Council shall
provide such data in an effort to determine best methods for abating the opioid crisis in Colorado.
3.8. Conflicts of Interest: Voting Members shall abide by the conflict-of-interest rules
applicable to local government officials under state law.
3.9. Ethics Laws: Voting Members shall abide by their local ethics laws or, if no such ethics
laws exist, by applicable state ethics laws.
3.10. Decision Making: The Regional Council shall seek to make all decisions by consensus. In
the event consensus cannot be achieved, the Regional Council shall make decisions by a majority
vote of its Members.
4. REGIONAL FISCAL AGENT
4.1. Purpose: According to the Colorado MOU, the Regional Council must designate a fiscal
agent for the Region prior to the Region receiving any Opioid funds from the Regional Share. All
funds from the Regional Share shall be distributed to the Regional Council’s fiscal agent for the
benefit of the entire Region.
4.2. Designation: The Regional Council shall nominate and designate a fiscal agent for the
Region by majority vote. Regional fiscal agents must be a board of county commissioners or a city
or town council or executive department, such as a department of finance.
4.3. Term: A Regional fiscal agent must be appointed by the Regional Council on an annual
basis. A Regional fiscal agent may serve as long as the Regional Council determines is appropriate,
including the length of any Settlement that contemplates the distribution of Opioid Funds within
Colorado.
4.4. Duties: The Regional fiscal agent shall receive, deposit, and make available Opioid Funds
distributed from the Abatement Council and provide expenditure reporting data to the
EXHIBIT G-1
DocuSign Envelope ID: A97F0DF8-5247-480F-B55A-658D8BCBC744
Abatement Council on an annual basis. In addition, the Regional fiscal agent shall perform certain
recordkeeping duties outlined below.
a. Opioid Funds: The Regional fiscal agent shall receive all Opioid Funds
as distributed by the Abatement Council. Upon direction by the Regional
Council, the Regional fiscal agent shall make any such Opioid Funds
available to the Regional Council.
b. Reporting: On an annual basis, as determined by the Abatement
Council, the Regional fiscal agent shall provide to the Abatement Council
the Regional Council’s expenditure data from their allocation of the
Regional Share and certify to the Abatement Council that the Regional
Council’s expenditures were for Approved Purposes and complied with its
2-year plan.
c. Recordkeeping: The Regional fiscal agent shall maintain necessary
records with regard the Regional Council’s meetings, decisions, plans, and
expenditure data.
4.5. Authority: The fiscal agent serves at the direction of the Regional Council and in service
to the entire Region. The terms of the Colorado MOU control the authority of a Regional Council,
and by extension, the Regional fiscal agent. A Regional fiscal agent shall not stray outside the
bounds of the authority and power vested by the Colorado MOU.
5. REGIONAL TWO-YEAR PLAN
5.1. Purpose: According to the Colorado MOU, as part of a Regional Council’s request
to the Abatement Council for Opioid Funds from its Regional Share, the Regional Council
must submit a 2-year plan identifying the Approved Purposes for which the requested funds
will be used.
5.2 Development of 2-Year Plan: In developing a 2-year plan, the Regional Council shall
solicit recommendations and information from all Regional PLGs and other stakeholders within its
Region for the purposes of sharing data, outcomes, strategies, and other relevant information
related to abating the opioid crisis in Colorado. At its discretion, a Regional Council may seek
assistance from the Abatement Council for purposes of developing a 2-year plan.
5.3 Amendment: At any point, a Regional Council’s 2-year plan may be amended so long as
such amendments comply with the terms of the Colorado MOU and any Settlement.
6. DISPUTES WITHIN REGION. In the event that any Regional PLG disagrees with a decision of the
Regional Council, or there is a dispute regarding the appointment of Voting or Non-Voting Members
to the Regional Council, that Regional PLG shall inform the Acting Chair of its dispute at the earliest
EXHIBIT G-1
DocuSign Envelope ID: A97F0DF8-5247-480F-B55A-658D8BCBC744
possible opportunity. In Response, the Regional Council shall gather any information necessary to
resolve the dispute. Within fourteen (14) days of the Regional PLG informing the Acting Chair of its
dispute, the Regional Council shall issue a decision with respect to the dispute. In reaching its decision,
the Regional Council may hold a vote of Voting Members, with the Acting Chair serving as the tie-
breaker, or the Regional Council may devise its own dispute resolution process. However, in any
disputes regarding the appointment of a Voting Member, that Voting Member will be recused from
voting on the dispute. The decision of the Regional Council is a final decision.
7. DISPUTES WITH ABATEMENT COUNCIL. If the Regional Council disputes the amount of Opioid Funds
it receives from its allocation of the Regional Share, the Regional Council shall alert the Abatement
Council within sixty (60) days of discovering the information underlying the dispute. However, the
failure to alert the Abatement Council within this time frame shall not constitute a waiver of the
Regional Council’s right to seek recoupment of any deficiency in its Regional Share.
8. RECORDKEEPING. The acting Regional fiscal agent shall be responsible for maintaining records
consistent with the Regional Agreement.
9. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVES. Each Regional PLGs’ representative designated below shall be the
point of contact to coordinate the obligations as provided herein. The Regional PLGs designate their
authorized representatives under this Regional Agreement as follows:
9.1. ______ designates the ____ of the ________ or their designee(s).
9.2. ______ designates the ____ of the ________ or their designee(s).
10. OBLIGATIONS OF THE REGIONAL PLGS. The Regional PLGs shall perform their respective
obligations as set forth in the Regional Agreement, the Colorado MOU and the accompanying exhibits
to the Colorado MOU and incorporated herein by reference.
11. TERM. The Regional Agreement will commence on _______, and shall expire on the date the last
action is taken by the Region, consistent with the terms of the Colorado MOU and any Settlement.
(the “Term”).
12. INFORMATIONAL OBLIGATIONS. Each Regional PLG hereto will meet its obligations as set forth in §
29-1-205, C.R.S., as amended, to include information about this Regional Agreement in a filing with
the Colorado Division of Local Government; however, failure to do so shall in no way affect the validity
of this Regional Agreement or any remedies available to the Regional PLGs hereunder.
13. CONFIDENTIALITY. The Regional PLGs, for themselves, their agents, employees and representatives,
agree that they will not divulge any confidential or proprietary information they receive from another
Regional PLG or otherwise have access to, except as may be required by law. Nothing in this Regional
EXHIBIT G-1
DocuSign Envelope ID: A97F0DF8-5247-480F-B55A-658D8BCBC744
Agreement shall in any way limit the ability of the Regional PLGs to comply with any laws or legal
process concerning disclosures by public entities. The Regional PLGs understand that all materials
exchanged under this Regional Agreement, including confidential information or proprietary
information, may be subject to the Colorado Open Records Act., § 24-72-201, et seq., C.R.S., (the
“Act”). In the event of a request to a Regional PLG for disclosure of confidential materials, the Regional
PLG shall advise the Regional PLGs of such request in order to give the Regional PLGs the opportunity
to object to the disclosure of any of its materials which it marked as, or otherwise asserts is,
proprietary or confidential. If a Regional PLG objects to disclosure of any of its material, the Regional
PLG shall identify the legal basis under the Act for any right to withhold. In the event of any action or
the filing of a lawsuit to compel disclosure, the Regional PLG agrees to intervene in such action or
lawsuit to protect and assert its claims of privilege against disclosure of such material or waive the
same. If the matter is not resolved, the Regional PLGs may tender all material to the court for judicial
determination of the issue of disclosure.
14. GOVERNING LAW; VENUE. This Regional Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of
Colorado. Venue for any legal action relating solely to this Regional Agreement will be in the applicable
District Court of the State of Colorado for the county of the Region’s fiscal agent. Venue for any legal
action relating to the Colorado MOU shall be in a court of competent jurisdiction where a Settlement
or consent decree was entered, as those terms are described or defined in the Colorado MOU. If a
legal action relates to both a Regional Agreement and the Colorado MOU, venue shall also be in a
court of competent jurisdiction where a Settlement or consent decree was entered.
15. TERMINATION. The Regional PLGs enter into this Regional Agreement to serve the public interest. If
this Regional Agreement ceases to further the public interest, a Regional PLG, in its discretion, may
terminate their participation in the Regional Agreement, in whole or in part, upon written notice to
the other Regional PLGs. Each Regional PLG also has the right to terminate the Regional Agreement
with cause upon written notice effective immediately, and without cause upon thirty (30) days prior
written notice to the other Regional PLGs. A Regional PLG’s decision to terminate this Regional
Agreement, with or without cause, shall have no impact on the other Regional PLGs present or future
administration of its Opioid Funds and the other procedures outlined in this Regional Agreement.
Rather, a Regional PLG’s decision to terminate this Regional Agreement shall have the same effect as
non-participation, as outlined in Section 3.2 (e).
16. NOTICES. “Key Notices” under this Regional Agreement are notices regarding default, disputes, or
termination of the Regional Agreement. Key Notices shall be given in writing and shall be deemed
EXHIBIT G-1
DocuSign Envelope ID: A97F0DF8-5247-480F-B55A-658D8BCBC744
received if given by confirmed electronic transmission that creates a record that may be retained,
retrieved and reviewed by a recipient thereof, and that may be directly reproduced in paper form by
such a recipient through an automated process, but specifically excluding facsimile transmissions and
texts when transmitted, if transmitted on a business day and during normal business hours of the
recipient, and otherwise on the next business day following transmission; certified mail, return receipt
requested, postage prepaid, three business days after being deposited in the United States mail; or
overnight carrier service or personal delivery, when received. For Key Notices, the Regional PLGs will
follow up any electronic transmission with a hard copy of the communication by the means described
above. All other communications or notices between the Regional PLGs that are not Key Notices may
be done via electronic transmission. The Regional PLGs agree that any notice or communication
transmitted by electronic transmission shall be treated in all manner and respects as an original
written document; any such notice or communication shall be considered to have the same binding
and legal effect as an original document. All Key Notices shall include a reference to the Regional
Agreement, and Key Notices shall be given to the Regional PLGs at the following addresses:
_____________________________
_____________________________
17. GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS
17.1. Independent Entities. The Regional PLGs enter into this Regional Agreement as separate,
independent governmental entities and shall maintain such status throughout.
17.2. Assignment. This Regional Agreement shall not be assigned by any Regional PLG without
the prior written consent of all Regional PLGs. Any assignment or subcontracting without
such consent will be ineffective and void and will be cause for termination of this Regional
Agreement.
17.3. Integration and Amendment. This Regional Agreement represents the entire agreement
between the Regional PLGs and terminates any oral or collateral agreement or
understandings. This Regional Agreement may be amended only by a writing signed by the
Regional PLGs. If any provision of this Regional Agreement is held invalid or unenforceable,
no other provision shall be affected by such holding, and the remaining provision of this
Regional Agreement shall continue in full force and effect.
EXHIBIT G-1
DocuSign Envelope ID: A97F0DF8-5247-480F-B55A-658D8BCBC744
17.4. No Construction Against Drafting Party. The Regional PLGs and their respective counsel
have had the opportunity to review the Regional Agreement, and the Regional Agreement
will not be construed against any Regional PLG merely because any provisions of the Regional
Agreement were prepared by a particular Regional PLG.
17.5. Captions and References. The captions and headings in this Regional Agreement are for
convenience of reference only and shall not be used to interpret, define, or limit its
provisions. All references in this Regional Agreement to sections (whether spelled out or
using the § symbol), subsections, exhibits or other attachments, are references to sections,
subsections, exhibits or other attachments contained herein or incorporated as a part hereof,
unless otherwise noted.
17.6. Statutes, Regulations, and Other Authority. Any reference in this Regional Agreement to
a statute, regulation, policy or other authority shall be interpreted to refer to such authority
then current, as may have been changed or amended since the execution of this Regional
Agreement.
17.7. Conflict of Interest. No Regional PLG shall knowingly perform any act that would conflict
in any manner with said Regional PLG’s obligations hereunder. Each Regional PLG certifies
that it is not engaged in any current project or business transaction, directly or indirectly, nor
has it any interest, direct or indirect, with any person or business that might result in a
conflict of interest in the performance of its obligations hereunder. No elected or employed
member of any Regional PLG shall be paid or receive, directly or indirectly, any share or part
of this Regional Agreement or any benefit that may arise therefrom.
17.8. Inurement. The rights and obligations of the Regional PLGs to the Regional Agreement
inure to the benefit of and shall be binding upon the Regional PLGs and their respective
successors and assigns, provided assignments are consented to in accordance with the terms
of the Regional Agreement.
17.9. Survival. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary, the Regional PLGs understand and
agree that all terms and conditions of this Regional Agreement and any exhibits that require
continued performance or compliance beyond the termination or expiration of this Regional
Agreement shall survive such termination or expiration and shall be enforceable against a
Regional PLG if such Regional PLG fails to perform or comply with such term or condition.
17.10. Waiver of Rights and Remedies. This Regional Agreement or any of its provisions may not
be waived except in writing by a Regional PLG’s authorized representative. The failure of a
EXHIBIT G-1
DocuSign Envelope ID: A97F0DF8-5247-480F-B55A-658D8BCBC744
Regional PLG to enforce any right arising under this Regional Agreement on one or more
occasions will not operate as a waiver of that or any other right on that or any other occasion.
17.11. No Third-Party Beneficiaries. Enforcement of the terms of the Regional Agreement and
all rights of action relating to enforcement are strictly reserved to the Regional PLGs. Nothing
contained in the Regional Agreement gives or allows any claim or right of action to any third
person or entity. Any person or entity other than the Regional PLGs receiving services or
benefits pursuant to the Regional Agreement is an incidental beneficiary only.
17.12. Records Retention. The Regional PLGs shall maintain all records, including working
papers, notes, and financial records in accordance with their applicable record retention
schedules and policies. Copies of such records shall be furnished to the Parties request.
17.13. Execution by Counterparts; Electronic Signatures and Records. This Regional Agreement
may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original,
but all of which shall constitute one and the same instrument. The Regional PLGs approve
the use of electronic signatures for execution of this Regional Agreement. All use of
electronic signatures shall be governed by the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act, C.R.S. §§
24-71.3-101, et seq. The Regional PLGs agree not to deny the legal effect or enforceability of
the Regional Agreement solely because it is in electronic form or because an electronic
record was used in its formation. The Regional PLGs agree not to object to the admissibility
of the Regional Agreement in the form of an electronic record, or a paper copy of an
electronic document, or a paper copy of a document bearing an electronic signature, on the
ground that it is an electronic record or electronic signature or that it is not in its original
form or is not an original.
17.14. Authority to Execute. Each Regional PLG represents that all procedures necessary to
authorize such Regional PLG’s execution of this Regional Agreement have been performed
and that the person signing for such Regional PLG has been authorized to execute the
Regional Agreement.
REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
4826-9997-5642, v. 7
EXHIBIT G-1
DocuSign Envelope ID: A97F0DF8-5247-480F-B55A-658D8BCBC744