No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 01/06/15 PUBLIC HEARING January 6, 2015 Present: Jill Ryan Chairman Kathy Chandler-Henry Commissioner Beth Ayres-Oliver Assistant County Attorney Kathy Scriver Deputy Clerk to the Board Absent: Sara Fisher Commissioner This being a scheduled Public Hearing,the following items were presented to the Board of County Commissioners for their consideration: Eagle County Payment Report Published under the direction of the Eagle County Board of County Commissioners December 2014 Vendor Type Amount 1001 General Fund PROFORCE MARKETING,INC. Supplies 824.99 PROFORCE MARKETING,INC. Supplies 1,174.16 ACTION PUBLISHING INC Services 245.91 ADP Services 11,529.50 ADP SCREENING&SELECTION SERVICES Services 855.75 ADVANCED TACTICAL ORDNANCE SYSTEMS,LLC Services 300.00 ADVANCED TACTICAL ORDNANCE SYSTEMS,LLC Supplies 1,419.00 ALEX IACOVETTO Payroll 207.40 ALPINE ARMS Supplies 899.00 ALPINE BANK Supplies 100.00 ALPINE LUMBER COMPANY Supplies 5.69 ALPINE LUMBER COMPANY Supplies 60.31 ALWAYS MOUNTAIN TIME,LLC Services 774.00 AMERICAN CONTRACTORS INDEMNITY COMPANY Services 142.00 AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CIVIL ENGINEERS Services 560.00 AMY SZCZESNY Services Reimbursement 371.84 ANA MENDOZA Services Reimbursement 120.00 APPLIED TRUST INC. Services 437.50 APPRAISAL INSTITUTE Services 340.00 AQUATICS ASSOCIATES INC Services 4,595.03 ARAMARK COMPANY Supplies 494.12 ARAMARK COMPANY Supplies 969.46 ARTHUR FREEMAN Services 208.32 AT&T Services 2,642.85 BALCOMB AND GREEN Services 2,350.00 BERNIECE GUTIERREZ Services Reimbursement 31.31 BETH AYRES OLIVER Services Reimbursement 113.60 BETH DOBRANSKY Services Reimbursement 129.92 BETH DOBRANSKY Supplies Reimbursement 72.00 BLAZING STARS,INC Supplies 412.00 BONNIE HAVLIK Civil Refunds 42.00 1 01/06/2015 BORDEN DAIRY COMPANY Supplies 902.70 BRANISLAV POLACIK Civil Refunds 26.20 BRIAN BEVAN Services 124.32 BRYAN TREU Payroll 1,971.88 CALPHO Services . 140.00 CAMERON ROSS CREGER Services 237.50 CAMERON ROSS CREGER Services 678.86 CANYON WATER RESOURCES LLC Services 3,600.00 CAPITAL ONE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION Services 350.00 CAPITAL ONE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION Supplies 145.15 CAPITAL ONE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION Supplies 512.24 CARDIFF CORP. Services 1,904.00 CASTLE PEAK VETERINARY SERVICE INC Services 989.68 CATHOLIC CHARITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES Services 1,700.00 CATHOLIC HEALTH INITIATIVES COLORADO Services 600.00 CDW LLC Supplies 2,246.50 CDW LLC Supplies 568.51 CDW LLC Supplies 26.59 CDW LLC Supplies 3,182.52 CED CONSOLIDATED ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTORS Supplies 591.43 CENTRAL DISTRIBUTING Supplies 31.34 CHARM-TEX INC. Supplies 251.20 CHEMA TOX LABORATORY,INC Services 1,080.00 CHERYL A BOTTOMLEY Services Reimbursement 236.16 CHRISTINA HOOPER Services Reimbursement 220.23 CIRESON,LLC Services 10,101.77 CITADEL SECURITY&INVESTIGATIONS Services 11,779.13 CLEAN DESIGNS Supplies 88.65 COLLEEN WIRTH Services Reimbursement 200.71 COLORADO DEPARTMENT AGRICULTURE Services 130.00 COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIROMEN Services 110.00 COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIROMEN Services 47.00 COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIROMEN Services 1,032.00 COLORADO MOUNTAIN COLLEGE Services 750.00 COLORADO MOUNTAIN NEWS MEDIA Services 2,111.71 COLORADO MOUNTAIN NEWS MEDIA Services 3,655.61 COLORADO OUTDOOR RETAIL GROUP,INC Supplies 179.98 COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY Services 152.40 COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY Services 20,447.00 COLORADO WEST MENTAL HEALTH INC Services 350.00 COLORADO WEST MENTAL HEALTH INC Services 2,250.00 COLWEST ROOFING AND WATERPROOFING CO.,INC. Services 2,777.58 COMCAST CORPORATION Services 270.48 CONSERVE A WATT LIGHTING INC Supplies 242.20 CORONA RESEARCH,INC. Services 10,000.00 CUTWATER INVESTOR SERVICES CORP Services 5,642.63 D&D MANZANARES,INC. Services 10,150.04 DALY PROPERTY SERVICES Services 1,816.00 DAN CORCORAN PLS Services 1,500.00 2 01/06/2015 DANIELA LEWY Services 431.20 DANIELA LEWY Services 162.31 DAVID A BAUER Civil Refunds 42.00 DAVID L.CHRISTIANSEN,LLC Services 1,800.00 DIRECT TV Services 3.99 DOCTORS ON CALL Services 840.00 EAGLE COUNTY GOVERNMENT Services 31.00 EAGLE COUNTY GOVERNMENT Civil Refunds 50.00 EAGLE COUNTY GOVERNMENT Supplies 10.98 EAGLE COUNTY GOVERNMENT-ATTN FINANCE Interfund Payables 894,193.51 EAGLE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Services 479,743.96 EAGLE COUNTY TREASURER Services 3.00 EAGLE COUNTY TREASURER Payroll 2,048,453.26 EAGLE RIVER WATER AND SANITATION Services 376.27 EAGLE RIVER WATER AND SANITATION Services 389.79 EAGLE RIVER WATERSHED COUNCIL INC Services 10,000.00 EAGLE RIVER WATERSHED COUNCIL INC Community Grants 12,500.00 EAGLE VALLEY ENTERPRISE Services 43.61 EAGLE VALLEY EVENTS INC Services 2,000.00 EAGLE VALLEY PRINTING Supplies 15.00 1 EARLY CHILDHOOD PARTNERS Services 1,680.00 EDWARDS BUILDING CENTER Supplies 19.16 EDWARDS COMMUNITY AUTHORITY Services 1,747.00 El MONTANES, LLC Services 710.00 ELIZABETH BAILEY Services Reimbursement 159.04 EVA WILSON Services Reimbursement 196.56 EVA WILSON Supplies Reimbursement 37.58 EVANGELINA MUNOZ-RUIZ Services Reimbursement 17.92 EVANGELINA MUNOZ-RUIZ Services Reimbursement 80.00 EVERETT FAMILY FUNERAL HOME AND CREMATORY Services 305.00 EXECUCOM Services 72.56 FEDERAL EXPRESS Services 72.89 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INCORPORATED Supplies 186.55 FERRELL GAS Services 1,289.51 FIRKINS GARAGE DOORS INC Services 800.00 FRANKLIN COVEY CLIENT SALE,INC. Services 5,365.06 GABRIELA MATA Services 158.48 GATEWAY SAFETY PRODUCTS Supplies 721.76 GORDON&MCWHIRTER,LLC Civil Refunds 38.00 GPS SERVERS,LLC Civil Refunds 14.20 GRAINGER INC Supplies 188.94 GRAN FARNUM PRINTING AND PUBLISHING Services 41.00 GREAT AMERICAN FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION Services 869.52 GREAT WEST RETIREMENT SERVICES Payroll 115,914.18 GREAT WEST RETIREMENT SERVICES Payroll 15,468.96 GREAT WEST RETIREMENT SERVICES Payroll 7,663.59 GREAT WEST RETIREMENT SERVICES Payroll 24,300.52 HABITAT FOR HUMANITY Community Grants 29,369.00 HALL&EVANS,LLC Services 540.00 3 01/06/2015 HARRIS LOCAL GOVERNMENT SOLUTIONS INC. Services 28,800.00 HIGH COUNTRY COPIERS Services 137.68 HILLS PET NUTRITION SALES INC Supplies 695.51 HOLLY HESTER Services 250.00 HOLY CROSS ENERGY Services 38,949.76 IMPRESSIONS OF ASPEN,INC Supplies 52,268.70 INSTITUTE OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS Services 276.28 INTERMOUNTAIN ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES,INC. Services 396.00 INTERMOUNTAIN LOCK Supplies 166.94 IRENE FIGUEROA Services Reimbursement 407.68 ISC,INC. Services 6,880.00 ISC,INC. Supplies 15,839.51 ISC,INC. Supplies 11,140.88 JACQUELINE MCKENNA Services 103.60 JAMIE FARQUHAR Civil Refunds 51.80 JEFF PIEPER Services Reimbursement 154.56 JEFF SAGE Services 5.04 JEFFERSON COUNTY Services 200.00 JERRY CHENEY Services 1,822.50 JESSICA WACLAWSKI Services Reimbursement 111.55 JESSICA WACLAWSKI Services Reimbursement 16.24 JOHN D.CARVER Services 1,210.00 KARA BETTIS CORONER Services Reimbursement 101.88 KARA BETTIS CORONER Services Reimbursement 95.20 KAREN VALAS Services Reimbursement 63.28 KATHY SCRIVER Services Reimbursement 61.60 KEN BROWN Supplies Reimbursement 29.19 KEVIN KROMER Services 3,555.00 KEVIN WILSON Civil Refunds 19.00 KRISTEN VALDEZ Services Reimbursement 34.72 LABSOURCE,INC. Supplies 475.00 LAMINATION SERVICE INC Supplies 337.50 LAURA SAMBRANO Services Reimbursement 153.44 LEXISNEXIS RISK DATA MANAGEMENT,INC Services 2.00 LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY Services 8,226.92 LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY Payroll 4,041.56 LINDA MCCAY Supplies 88.00 LINDSEY SULLIVAN Civil Refunds 19.00 LK SURVEY INSTRUMENTS INCORPORATED Supplies 205.45 LOOMIS ARMORED US,LLC Services 351.23 LORI PEDERSEN Services 105.00 M 7 BUSINESS SYSTEMS Services 1,220.09 MAGGIE SWONGER Services Reimbursement 117.60 MAGGIE SWONGER Services Reimbursement 308.56 MAGGIE SWONGER Services Reimbursement 34.16 MAGNUM-DIEGO Civil Refunds 19.00 Maria Elizalde Services Reimbursement 16.24 MARIA RIOS Services Reimbursement 139.66 MARK CHAPIN Services Reimbursement 290.41 4 01/06/2015 MARKS PLUMBING PARTS Supplies 98.83 MATTHEW BENDER&COMPANY,INC, Supplies 49.46 MEADOW MOUNTAIN PLUMBING Services 741.25 MESA COUNTY Services 100.00 Metech Inc. Services 143.01 Micha Bauer Payroll 2,554.95 MICHAEL KNAPP Civil Refunds 19.00 MICHELLE DIBOS Services Reimbursement 42.56 MICHELLE DIBOS Services Reimbursement 115.00 MID VALLEY ELECTRIC INC. Supplies 370.38 MID VALLEY METROPOLITAN DISTRICT Services 372.30 MID VALLEY METROPOLITAN DISTRICT Services 33.13 MORPHOTRUST USA,INC. Services 1,111.00 MORPHOTRUST USA,INC. Capital 25,122.00 MOUNTAIN PEST CONTROL,INC. Services 920.00 MOUNTAIN STATES EMPLOYERS COUNCIL INCORPORATED Services 345.00 , MOUNTAIN TOP VENTURES,INC. Services 11,668.75 MWI VETERNIARY SUPPLY COMPANY Services 495.25 MWI VETERNIARY SUPPLY COMPANY Supplies 408.75 NARDA REIGEL Services 3,952.00 NICOLETTI-FLATER ASSOCIATES,PLLP Services 150.00 I NORTHWEST COLORADO COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS Services 100.00 NORTHWEST LOAN FUND State Grant 170,009.00 OCCUSCREEN,LLC Services 294.00 OFFICE DEPOT Supplies 42.34 OFFICE DEPOT Supplies 1,488.15 ONTIVEROS,LUPE Services Reimbursement 46.57 ORTEGA,ALBERTO Services 500.00 PAINT BUCKET Supplies 1,142.60 PAPER WISE Services 457.00 PATRICIA HAMMON, Services 625.00 PATRICIA HAMMON, Services 62.72 PEAK PERFORMANCE COPIER&SUPPLY,INC Services 61.58 PECKHAM&MCKENNEY Services 4,251.08 PET PICK UPS Supplies 656.85 Pitkin County Title,Inc. Refund 59.50 PITNEY BOWES Services 126.00 PITNEY BOWES Services 25,724.60 PRECINCT POLICE PRODUCTS Supplies 168.87 PRECINCT POLICE PRODUCTS Supplies 501.92 PRO CHRYSLER JEEP,INC. Capital 65,955.00 PRO CHRYSLER JEEP,INC. Capital -5,850.00 PROFESSIONAL TREE AND TURF INC Supplies 60.04 PROFORMA H2R MARKETING GROUP Services 95.00 PUBLIC TRUST ADVISORS,LLC Services 457.19 QUEST DIAGNOSTICS Services 84.00 RACHEL OYS Services Reimbursement 158.99 RACHEL OYS Supplies Reimbursement 219.83 REGINA O'BRIEN Services Reimbursement 48.16 5 01/06/2015 RHIANNON ROWE Services Reimbursement 399.00 ROARING FORK SCHOOL DISTRICT RE-1 Services 1,600.00 ROARING FORK SCHOOL DISTRICT RE-1 Federal Grant 91,287.31 ROBERT A.KURTZMAN Services Reimbursement 4,801.00 Rocky Mountain Information Network,Inc. Services 250.00 RON GRUBER DVM Services 30.00 ROSS&WHITE Supplies 12.28 RUTH A.SHARP,PC Civil Refunds 16.00 SALVATION ARMY Community Grants 10,000.00 SAMARITAN CENTER OF THE ROCKIES Services 70.00 SARA J FISHER Services Reimbursement 347.20 SECUREWORKS,INC. Services 25,928.16 SECURITY TRANSPORT SERVICES INCORPORATED Services 1,984.50 SHAMROCK FOODS CORPORATION Supplies 3,929.20 SHAREE WETTSTEIN Services Reimbursement 11.20 SHAREE WETTSTEIN Supplies Reimbursement 22.96 SHAREE WETTSTEIN Supplies Reimbursement 165.21 SHERWIN WILLIAMS PAINT CO Supplies 22.84 SIGNATURE SIGNS INC Supplies 28.50 SOURCE GAS Services 9,343.15 SPRONK WATER ENGINEERS Services 270.00 STAPLES ADVANTAGE Supplies 305.26 STATE OF COLORADO Services 1,285.74 Stephen Laterra Civil Refunds 19.00 STEVEN NOFZIGER Services 100.00 SULLIVAN GREEN SEAVY LLC Services 1,502.50 TAFT ENGINEERING,INC. Services 1,413.36 TARRANT ENTERPRISES,INC Services 6,810.00 TCC CONTRACTORS Services 7,313.37 TEAK SIMONTON Services Reimbursement 6,886.80 TEAK SIMONTON Services Reimbursement 231.84 TEAK SIMONTON Supplies Reimbursement 330.58 TERRY STERN Civil Refunds 15.00 THE ARTWORKS Services 175.00 THE DENVER POST LLC Services 975.00 THE FOUNDATION OF TRUSTEES FOR FAMILY LEARNING CEN Services 34,629.41 THE MASTER'S TOUCH,LLC Services 3,993.85 THE OLD GYPSUM PRINTER,INC Services 267.20 THE OLD GYPSUM PRINTER,INC Services 351.88 THOMPSON WEST GROUP Services 2,250.49 TONI ROZANSKI Services Reimbursement 40.76 TOWN OF EAGLE Services 4,488.00 TOWN OF EAGLE Services 954.80 TOWN OF GYPSUM Services 127.89 TOWN OF GYPSUM Services 189.77 TRANSUNION RISK AND ALTERNATIVE DATA SOLUTIONS,INC Services 35.00 TRI COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION INC Services 63.00 TRIAD SERVICE SOLUTIONS,INC Supplies 108.77 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES,INC Services 6,200.00 6 01/06/2015 TYSON T IVIE Services 625.00 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE Services 44.49 UNITED REPROGRAPHIC Services 189.00 US FOODS,INC Supplies 336.98 US FOODS,INC Supplies 6,872.05 VAIL BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE Services 2,775.00 VAIL ELECTRONICS,INC. . Services 185.50 VAIL HONEYWAGON LTD Services 11.74 VAIL MULTI-LIST SERVICES INC Services 507.00 VAIL VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER Services 146.55 VALLEY ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC. Supplies 104.01 VALLEY LUMBER Supplies 46.18 VALUE WEST,INC Services 14,600.00 VANESA DOTY Services Reimbursement 50.00 VERIZON WIRELESS INC Services 6,553.23 VINCI LAW OFFICE Civil Refunds 13.00 VISA CARD SERVICES Services 222.75 VISA CARD SERVICES Services 10,017.99 VISA CARD SERVICES Services 35.25 VISA CARD SERVICES Services 2,881.78 VISA CARD SERVICES Services 113.98 VISA CARD SERVICES Services 429.75 VISA CARD SERVICES Services 3,024.83 VISA CARD SERVICES Services 68.45 VISA CARD SERVICES Services 482.50 VISA CARD SERVICES Services 846.89 VISA CARD SERVICES Services 1,967.42 VISA CARD SERVICES Services 410.58 VISA CARD SERVICES Services 300.00 VISA CARD SERVICES Services 39.52 VISA CARD SERVICES Supplies 4,722.31 VISA CARD SERVICES Supplies 2,598.00 VISA CARD SERVICES Supplies 690.63 VISA CARD SERVICES Supplies 543.43 VISA CARD SERVICES Supplies 691.45 VISA CARD SERVICES Supplies 565.47 VISA CARD SERVICES Supplies 351.84 VISA CARD SERVICES Supplies 2,437.67 VISA CARD SERVICES Supplies 1,102.00 WAGEWORKS,INC Payroll 3,167.39 WAGEWORKS,INC Payroll 8,473.91 WAGNER EQUIPMENT COMPANY Services 622.38 Wakefield&Associates,Inc. Civil Refunds 111.00 WALKING MOUNTAINS Community Grants 90,884.00 WELLS FARGO BANK Services 200.00 WELLS FARGO BANK Services 4,000.00 WELLS FARGO BANK,N.A. Services 281.00 WENTWORTH,GLENDA Services 50.00 WEST BROWN HUNTLEY THOMPSON PC Civil Refunds 50.80 7 01/06/2015 WEST GRAND SCHOOL DISTRICT#1-JT. Federal Grant 228.51 WESTERN EAGLE COUNTY ROTARY CLUB Services 220.00 WESTERN SLOPE SUPPLIES Supplies 248.60 WILLITS GENERAL STORE Services 28.00 WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY Supplies 18.99 WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY Supplies 239.07 WYN T TAYLOR Civil Refunds 33.00 XCEL ENERGY Services 597.38 XENTRY SYSTEMS INTEGRATION LLC Supplies 118.08 XEROX CORPORATION,INC Services 375.33 XEROX CORPORATION,INC Services 4,896.84 XEROX CORPORATION,INC Supplies 9.67 1001 General Fund Total 4,710,040.90 1100 Road and Bridge Fund A MEMORABLE FEAST BY YOUR PERSONAL CHEF,INC Supplies 793.50 BLAKE MARTIN Supplies 22.79 BLUE TARP FINANCIAL,INC. Supplies 5,030.40 BRATTON ENTERPRISE INC Supplies 3,381.76 BRUCE WALLACE Supplies 71.20 CARDIFF CORP. Services 450.00 D&D MANZANARES,INC. Services 346.37 EAGLE COUNTY GOVERNMENT-ATTN FINANCE Interfund Payables 695,851.43 EAGLE COUNTY TREASURER Payroll 91,562.45 EAGLE RIVER WATER AND SANITATION Services 65.57 GMCO CORPORATION Supplies 21,616.18 GREAT WEST RETIREMENT SERVICES Payroll 11,273.28 GREAT WEST RETIREMENT SERVICES Payroll 145.80 GREAT WEST RETIREMENT SERVICES Payroll 150.00 GREAT WEST RETIREMENT SERVICES Payroll 3,602.78 HOLY CROSS ENERGY Services 1,194.90 INTERMOUNTAIN ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES,INC. Services 140.00 J&S CONTRACTORS SUPPLY CO Supplies 25.03 KEITH BRAND Collateral Reimbursement 140.00 LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY Payroll 426.16 MID VALLEY METROPOLITAN DISTRICT Services 141.53 OFFICE DEPOT Supplies 23.35 OFFICE DEPOT Supplies 17.46 PAPER WISE Services 21.00 PST ENTERPRISES INC Supplies 554.57 RAYMOND LONG Supplies Reimbursement 93.71 RAYMOND LONG Supplies Reimbursement 100.00 SAFETY AND CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY Supplies 168.44 SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER INC Capital 2,852.68 SOURCE GAS Services 493.04 TOWN OF GYPSUM Services 200.98 TOWN OF GYPSUM Services 194.73 VISA CARD SERVICES Services -187.00 VISA CARD SERVICES Supplies 730.74 8 01/06/2015 WAGEWORKS,INC Payroll 384.60 WESTERN SLOPE SUPPLIES Supplies 19.75 WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY Supplies 290.37 WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY Supplies 730.72 XEROX CORPORATION,INC Services 180.93 YAMPA VALLEY ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Services 270.15 YAMPA VALLEY ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Capital 17,542.20 YOUR PARTS HAUS CORP Supplies 69.17 YOUR PARTS HAUS CORP Supplies 102.62 1100 Road and Bridge Fund Total 861,285.34 1110 Social Services Fund ALWAYS MOUNTAIN TIME,LLC Services 2,130.00 ANDREA LARKIN Services Reimbursement 46.59 ANDREA LARKIN Services Reimbursement 620.09 BI INC Services 120.00 CAMILA STEFLI Services 89.04 CAMILA STEFLI Services 29.68 CANDACE EVES Services 107.52 CAPITAL ONE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION Services 150.00 CARLY CHEATHAM Services Reimbursement 151.76 CARLY CHEATHAM Services Reimbursement 140.00 CDW LLC Supplies 241.27 COLORADO MOUNTAIN NEWS MEDIA Services 1,185.03 CYNTHIA AGUILAR Services Reimbursement 38.52 CYNTHIA AGUILAR Services Reimbursement 33.60 DISCOVER GOODWILL OF SOUTHERN AND WESTERN COLORADO Services 1,078.00 EAGLE COUNTY GOVERNMENT-ATTN FINANCE Interfund Payables 265,223.01 EAGLE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Services 1,497.84 EAGLE COUNTY TREASURER Payroll 143,776.57 EAGLE VALLEY CHILD CARE ASSOCIATION Services 519.20 El MONTANES, LLC Services 208.00 FYS SERVICES,INC Services 3,681.15 GLOBALSTAR USA Services 34.19 GREAT WEST RETIREMENT SERVICES Payroll 16,789.64 GREAT WEST RETIREMENT SERVICES Payroll 1,337.15 GREAT WEST RETIREMENT SERVICES Payroll 2,521.52 HOLLY KASPER Services Reimbursement 122.08 JESSICA WACLAWSKI Services Reimbursement 13.98 JESSICA WACLAWSKI Services Reimbursement 268.47 JOANNE M.ROCK Services 87.18 JOHN C COLLINS PC Services 10,100.00 KENDRA SCHLEFF Services Reimbursement 59.36 LABORATORY CORPORATION OF AMERICA HOLDINGS Services 204.00 LEARNING CURVE PRESCHOOL Services 754.35 LEXISNEXIS RISK DATA MANAGEMENT,INC Services 26.50 LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY Payroll 469.68 LORA LYNN RUSSELL Services 500.00 MARICELA PINELA Services Reimbursement 40.32 9 01/06/2015 MAYA BELBECK Services 19.60 MEGAN BURCH Services Reimbursement 5.60 MEGAN BURCH Supplies Reimbursement 20.00 MELISSA BARBOUR Services 112.84 MICHELLE DIBOS Services Reimbursement 73.92 MONICA CASILLAS Services Reimbursement 100.48 NATHAN YOUNG Services 178.64 NELY DAVILA Services 152.22 NORMA LIZETH RUIZ Services Reimbursement 80.89 OFFICE DEPOT Supplies 51.00 OFFICE DEPOT Supplies 275.87 PITKIN COUNTY Services 42,830.78 PITKIN COUNTY Services 100.00 RDDT,INC. Services 105.00 ROSA REA Services Reimbursement 92.71 SARAH LUBEN Services Reimbursement 690.04 SARAH LUBEN Services Reimbursement 11.76 SHEANNETTE O'DELL Payroll 1,483.88 SONIA ACOSTA Services Reimbursement 419.44 STREET MEDIA GROUP Services 270.00 THE FOUNDATION OF TRUSTEES FOR FAMILY LEARNING CEN Services 1,129.04 THE NORTH HIGHLAND COMPANY Services 30,000.00 THE VAIL CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER Services 1,371.20 TIGA Advertising,Inc. Services 1,450.00 TONI ROZANSKI Services Reimbursement 582.47 TONI ROZANSKI Services Reimbursement 1.68 UNIVERSITY PHYSICIANS,INC Services 360.00 VERIZON WIRELESS INC Services 1,557.23 VERIZON WIRELESS INC Services 8.00 VISA CARD SERVICES Services 246.17 VISA CARD SERVICES Services 295.00 VISA CARD SERVICES Services 327.86 VISA CARD SERVICES Services 143.25 VISA CARD SERVICES Services 85.44 VISA CARD SERVICES Services 49.95 VISA CARD SERVICES Services 1,079.09 VISA CARD SERVICES Supplies 1,448.89 VISA CARD SERVICES Supplies 53.00 VISA CARD SERVICES Supplies 60.94 VISA CARD SERVICES Supplies 28.44 WAGEWORKS,INC Payroll 1,918.50 WAGEWORKS,INC Payroll 1,568.85 YOLANDA M.THIERFELDER Services Reimbursement 44.80 YOLANDA M.THIERFELDER Services Reimbursement 147.28 1110 Social Services Fund Total 545,427.04 1140 Offsite Road Improvements Crown Mountain Park&Recreation District Community Grants 23,526.08 EAGLE COUNTY GOVERNMENT-ATTN FINANCE Interfund Payables 39,032.00 10 01/06/2015 ROARING FORK TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY Community Grants 18,658.62 STATE OF COLORADO Community Grants 350,000.00 1140 Offsite Road Improvements Total 431,216.70 1151 Sales Tax E.V.Transp. ALPINE LUMBER COMPANY Supplies 131.23 APOLLO VIDEO TECHNOLOGY Supplies 1,355.73 AT&T Services 3,575.31 BOUNDLESS NETWORK Supplies 3,165.32 BRONN TRUCKING INC. Services 525.00 CENTRAL DISTRIBUTING Supplies 5,854.41 CENTURYLINK Services 544.09 CLEVER DEVICES,LTD Services 14,686.56 COLLETTS ENTERPRISES,INC. Supplies 2,462.85 COMPLIANCE ALLIANCE INC Services 1,390.00 D&D MANZANARES,INC. Services 362.48 DOCTORS ON CALL Services 455.00 EAGLE COUNTY GOVERNMENT-ATTN FINANCE Interfund Payables 733,806.37 EAGLE COUNTY TREASURER Payroll 243,143.16 FIRST TRANSIT,INC. Services 1,100.00 GREAT WEST RETIREMENT SERVICES Payroll 21,071.76 GREAT WEST RETIREMENT SERVICES Payroll 1,067.59 GREAT WEST RETIREMENT SERVICES Payroll 67.98 GREAT WEST RETIREMENT SERVICES Payroll 2,817.08 HI CRANES INCORPORATED Services 300.00 HOLY CROSS ENERGY Services 862.75 INNOVATIVE ENERGY Services 683.00 KSKE NRC BROADCASTING Services 1,082.00 LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY Payroll 832.30 LOOMIS ARMORED US,LLC Services 231.92 MICHELLE COLLEY Services Reimbursement 20.30 MILLENNIUM TOWING AND RECOVERY Services 700.00 MOUNTAIN MAINTENANCE Services 540.00 MOUNTAIN TOP VENTURES,INC. Services 393.75 NEXTEL Services 1,555.61 PARKVILLE WATER DISTRICT Services 63.25 PETER MUNYAN Payroll 795.68 RAE CONSULTANTS,INC Services 3,025.00 ROUTEMATCH SOFTWARE,INC Supplies 628.57 SAMBA HOLDINGS,INC. Services 138.00 SOURCE GAS Services 389.30 TOWN OF AVON Services 72.57 TOWN OF AVON Supplies 14,198.69 TOWN OF AVON Services 10,803.50 TOWN OF GYPSUM Services 219.25 TOWN OF GYPSUM Services 212.43 VISA CARD SERVICES Services 115.00 VISA CARD SERVICES Services 198.44 VISA CARD SERVICES Services 48.65 11 01/06/2015 VISA CARD SERVICES Supplies 38.82 VISA CARD SERVICES Supplies 9.38 VISA CARD SERVICES Supplies 581.20 VISA CARD SERVICES Supplies 352.13 WAGEWORKS,INC Payroll 812.96 XEROX CORPORATION,INC Services 533.06 1151 Sales Tax E.V.Transp.Total 1,078,019.43 1152 Sales Tax E.V.Trails ALPINE ENGINEERING INC Capital 810.00 CERES DESIGN&ARBORCAPE,LLC Services 590.00 DOUBLE M ASPHALT COATINGS INC. Services 5,624.40 EAGLE COUNTY GOVERNMENT-ATTN FINANCE Interfund Payables 3,117.49 EAGLE COUNTY TREASURER Payroll 9,867.52 GRAND JUNCTION PIPE Capital 280.49 GREAT WEST RETIREMENT SERVICES Payroll 1,100.60 Michael W.West&Associates,Inc. Capital 740.00 MOUNTAIN MAINTENANCE Services 5,710.00 OFFICE DEPOT Supplies 31.50 TOWN OF AVON Services 395,419.85 V&M ENTERPRISES,LLC Supplies 248.00 VISA CARD SERVICES Services -30.00 VISA CARD SERVICES Supplies 359.24 VISA CARD SERVICES Supplies 228.32 WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY Capital 488.30 1152 Sales Tax E.V.Trails Total 424,585.71 1153 Sales Tax R.F.V.Transp. ROARING FORK TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY Sales Tax 64,966.84 1153 Sales Tax R.F.V.Transp.Total 64,966.84 ROARING FORK TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY Sales Tax 7,218.54 1154 Sales Tax R.F.V.Trails 1154 Sales Tax R.F.V.Trails Total 7,218.54 1155 Transportation Capital ELAM CONSTRUCTION INC Capital 34,997.52 STATE OF COLORADO Community Grants 180,000.00 1155 Transportation Capital Total 214,997.52 1160 Airport Fund WENDY GREENING Supplies 8,256.84 ALPINE LUMBER COMPANY Supplies 882.55 BERTHOD MOTORS INC Supplies 37.23 BLAZING STARS,INC Supplies 180.00 CAMPBELL-HILL AVIATION GROUP,LLC Services 1,617.50 CED CONSOLIDATED ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTORS Supplies 1,435.42 CENTURYLINK Services 3,208.85 12 01/06/2015 CHRISTINA ANNE COCKREAM Services Reimbursement 1,000.00 COLLETTS ENTERPRISES,INC. Supplies 39.00 COLLETTS ENTERPRISES,INC. Supplies 18,061.53 COMPLIANCE ALLIANCE INC Services 295.00 CROSS MATCH TECHNOLOGIES,INC. Services 1,168.00 D&D MANZANARES,INC. Services 1,824.00 DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Services 1,875.31 DM LUXURY,LLC Services 5,000.00 EAGLE COUNTY AIR TERMINAL Services 3,012.00 EAGLE COUNTY GOVERNMENT-ATTN FINANCE Interfund Payables 260,598.72 EAGLE COUNTY TREASURER Payroll 109,850.85 EAGLE VALLEY ENTERPRISE Capital 44.50 FASTENAL COMPANY Supplies 243.68 FCI CONSTRUCTION,INC. Capital 296,788.99 GREAT WEST RETIREMENT SERVICES Payroll 11,378.86 GREAT WEST RETIREMENT SERVICES Payroll 316.52 GREAT WEST RETIREMENT SERVICES Payroll 3,781.28 HIGH COUNTRY COPIERS Services 105.66 HOLY CROSS ENERGY Services 5,135.32 JANET CARRIERI Services Reimbursement 73.92 JANET CARRIERI Supplies Reimbursement 16.07 JVIATION,INC Services 4,056.00 JVIATION,INC Capital 92,725.00 KAPLAN KIRSCH&ROCKWELL,LLP Services 1,087.50 KEVIN PFEIFFER Services Reimbursement 1,000.00 LAWSON PRODUCTS,INC Supplies 961.61 LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY Payroll 166.10 MICRO PLASTICS INC Supplies 21.68 MILTON SOUZA Services 1,000.00 Nathaniel Blaser Payroll 1,588.17 OFFICE DEPOT Supplies 219.47 ORKIN LLC Services 1,997.11 OSHKOSH TRUCK CORPORATION Supplies 11,728.87 PRO ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS,INC Capital 2,493.45 PST ENTERPRISES INC Supplies 1,620.06 RUSTY S.GURULE Services 1,000.00 Sandy's Office Supply Supplies 107.68 SOURCE GAS Services 2,285.81 STREET MEDIA GROUP Services 400.00 THE STATE CHEMICAL MFG CO Supplies 216.84 TOWN OF GYPSUM Services 437.10 VISA CARD SERVICES Services 1,193.13 VISA CARD SERVICES Services 100.66 VISA CARD SERVICES Services 12.82 VISA CARD SERVICES Services 130.00 VISA CARD SERVICES Services 178.44 VISA CARD SERVICES Services 2,000.00 VISA CARD SERVICES Supplies 3,768.74 VISA CARD SERVICES Supplies 48.98 13 01/06/2015 VISA CARD SERVICES Supplies 88.59 VISA CARD SERVICES Services 1,605.20 WAGNER EQUIPMENT COMPANY Supplies 291.85 WASTE MANAGEMENT INCORPORATED Services 94.50 WESTERN SLOPE CONCRETE,LLC Supplies 356.25 WESTERN SLOPE SUPPLIES Supplies 74.85 WIRELESS ADVANCED COMMUNICATIONS INC. Supplies 1,100.00 WITMER PUBLIC SAFETY GROUP,INC Supplies 645.00 WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY Supplies 97.95 XEROX CORPORATION,INC Services 674.33 1160 Airport Fund Total 873,801.34 1170 Conservation Trust Fund WESTERN EAGLE COUNTY METROPOLITIAN RECREATION DIST Services 1,150.00 1170 Conservation Trust Fund Total 1,150.00 1180 800 MHZ Fund CENTURYLINK Services 614.16 E-470 PUBLIC HIGHWAY AUTHORITY Services 9.85 EAGLE COUNTY GOVERNMENT-ATTN FINANCE Interfund Payables 7,531.61 EAGLE COUNTY TREASURER Payroll 5,610.72 GREAT WEST RETIREMENT SERVICES Payroll 676.42 GREAT WEST RETIREMENT SERVICES Payroll 40.92 GREAT WEST RETIREMENT SERVICES Payroll 26.00 HOLY CROSS ENERGY Services 587.01 LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY Payroll 3.00 MENENDEZ ARCHITECTS PC Services 258.75 QWEST CORPORATION Services 1,450.00 US DOI BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT Services 155.25 VISA CARD SERVICES Services 92.69 VISA CARD SERVICES Supplies 600.00 XEROX CORPORATION,INC Services 180.93 1180 800 MHZ Fund Total 17,837.31 1209 Public Health Fund A MEMORABLE FEAST BY YOUR PERSONAL CHEF,INC Supplies 195.00 ANDY'S REPAIR INC. Services 412.50 ASD SPECIALTHY HEALTHCARE,INC Supplies 908.00 ASPEN TO PARACHUTE DENTAL HEALTH ALLIANCE Services 515.60 BARBARA WHITFORD Services 14.32 CAPITAL ONE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION Supplies 61.76 CAPITAL ONE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION Supplies 1,004.13 CARLY RIETMANN Services Reimbursement 23.74 CHRISTI COUCH Services 240.00 COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIROMEN Services 100.00 COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES,INC Services 3,410.00 CONSORTIUM FOR OLDER ADULT WELLNESS Services 4,500.00 CONSORTIUM FOR OLDER ADULT WELLNESS Supplies 1,503.00 14 01/06/2015 COPY COPY Supplies 307.68 CORONA RESEARCH,INC. Services 23,147.00 DAVID E.MOTT Services 56.00 DEBBIE VERNELL Services 160.00 EAGLE COUNTY GOVERNMENT Services 162.16 EAGLE COUNTY GOVERNMENT-ATTN FINANCE Interfund Payables 169,712.55 EAGLE COUNTY TREASURER Payroll 109,278.93 EARLY CHILDHOOD PARTNERS Services 600.00 ELMER L CHRISTIANSAN Services 150.00 GARFIELD COUNTY Services 50.00 GILMA GARCIA Services 117.60 GREAT WEST RETIREMENT SERVICES Payroll 12,374.04 GREAT WEST RETIREMENT SERVICES Payroll 480.24 GREAT WEST RETIREMENT SERVICES Payroll 257.70 GREAT WEST RETIREMENT SERVICES Payroll 1,925.72 H.D.SMITH HOLDING COMPANY Supplies 95.75 HARRY VERNELL Services 160.00 HEINRICH MARKETING,INC. Services 2,714.50 HENRY SCHEIN Supplies 618.44 HENRY SCHEIN Supplies 481.85 INSIGHT PUBLIC SECTOR,INC Supplies 265.20 JENNIE WAHRER Services Reimbursement 12.32 JENNIE WAHRER Services Reimbursement 217.84 JENNIFER LUDWIG Services Reimbursement 148.96 JENNIFER LUDWIG Services Reimbursement 15.00 JENNIFER LUDWIG Supplies Reimbursement 31.22 JERRY CHICOINE Services 80.00 JILL CLEGHORN Services 75.20 JOAN BERGER Services 3.20 JULIE BLOOMINGDALE Services 72.80 JULIE BLOOMINGDALE Supplies 20.00 KAREN KOENEMANN Services Reimbursement 97.66 KAREN KOENEMANN Services Reimbursement 30.00 KATHLEEN HEICHER Services 24.40 KATIE HAAS Services Reimbursement 54.88 KELLY MATIAS Services Reimbursement 154.56 LARSON,REBECCA Services Reimbursement 117.60 LARSON,REBECCA Services Reimbursement 23.52 LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY Payroll 249.10 LINDA CARR Services 36.40 LINDA SNEATH Services 42.00 MARY JANE HESS Services 7.20 MARY PATRICIA WITT Services 280.00 MEIGHEN LOVELACE Services 160.00 METROPOLITAN PATHOLOGIST PC Services 444.00 NANCY MULLER Services 6.00 OFFICE DEPOT Supplies 7.45 OFFICE DEPOT Supplies 65.62 OFFICE DEPOT Supplies 9.48 15 01/06/2015 OFFICE DEPOT Supplies 92.76 ONTIVEROS,LUPE Services Reimbursement 23.99 PAT NOLAN Services Reimbursement 39.20 PAULA A PALMATEER Services 80.00 PETER STROH Services 9,000.00 RACHAEL MESSERICH Services Reimbursement 1,168.23 REBECCA T MCCAULLEY Services Reimbursement 154.28 ROSE M.CLARICE Services 3.60 ROSEANNE B.CASSIDY Services 36.00 SANDRA EINSPAHR Services 9.60 SANOFI PASTEUR INC. Supplies 3,901.15 SIGN LANGUAGE,LLC Services 633.00 STAPLES ADVANTAGE Supplies 2.72 STEPHANIE GLENWRIGHT Services 30.40 STERICYCLE INC Services 457.19 SUSAN MOTT Services 60.00 SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF DENVER Supplies 15.84 SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF DENVER Supplies 1,279.96 TENIE CHICOINE Services 80.00 THERESA CAREY Services Reimbursement 23.52 THERESA CAREY Services Reimbursement 70.56 TONI BERNS Services 158.80 VANESA DOTY Services Reimbursement 49.28 VERIZON WIRELESS INC Services 699.84 VISA CARD SERVICES Services 120.00 VISA CARD SERVICES Services 586.26 VISA CARD SERVICES Services 125.80 VISA CARD SERVICES Supplies 718.30 VISA CARD SERVICES Supplies 628.17 VISA CARD SERVICES Supplies 1,339.15 VISA CARD SERVICES Supplies 56.80 WAGEWORKS,INC Payroll 76.92 WAGEWORKS,INC Payroll 403.07 YVONNE AMMON Services 80.00 ZIRMED,INC. Services 25.00 1209 Public Health Fund Total 360,719.21 1401 Housing Operations Fund DANIEL MURRAY Payroll 1,744.08 EAGLE COUNTY GOVERNMENT-ATTN FINANCE Interfund Payables 138,615.78 EAGLE COUNTY TREASURER Payroll 49,573.16 GREAT WEST RETIREMENT SERVICES Payroll 6,428.47 GREAT WEST RETIREMENT SERVICES Payroll 64.30 GREAT WEST RETIREMENT SERVICES Payroll 3,215.38 GREAT WEST RETIREMENT SERVICES Payroll 1,028.34 LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY Payroll 208.60 VISA CARD SERVICES Services 68.56 VISA CARD SERVICES Services 64.82 VISA CARD SERVICES Services 1,296.93 16 01/06/2015 VISA CARD SERVICES Services 146.37 VISA CARD SERVICES Services 169.17 VISA CARD SERVICES Services 196.61 VISA CARD SERVICES Services 843.19 WAGEWORKS,INC Payroll 2,284.60 WAGEWORKS,INC Payroll 407.02 1401 Housing Operations Fund Total 206,355.38 1442 Open Space Fund AQUATICS ASSOCIATES INC Services 2,721.54 EAGLE COUNTY GOVERNMENT-ATTN FINANCE Interfund Payables 146,137.69 EAGLE COUNTY TREASURER Payroll 7,805.92 EWING TRUCKING&CONSTRUCTION,LLC Services 8,190.00 GREAT WEST RETIREMENT SERVICES Payroll 1,151.82 GREAT WEST RETIREMENT SERVICES Payroll 1,372.06 GREAT WEST RETIREMENT SERVICES Payroll 41.92 HERITAGE TITLE COMPANY Capital 295,192.50 High Country Engineering,Inc. Capital 3,656.50 HOLY CROSS ENERGY Services 94.58 OLDCASTLE SW GROUP,INC Capital 217,589.23 PET PICK UPS Supplies 656.84 SIGN DESIGN&GRAPHICS,LLC Supplies 2,660.00 TOBY SPRUNK Services Reimbursement 140.00 VISA CARD SERVICES Services 68.57 VISA CARD SERVICES Supplies 37.78 VISA CARD SERVICES Supplies 170.28 WAGEWORKS,INC Payroll 218.98 YAMPA VALLEY ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Services 73.01 1442 Open Space Fund Total 687,979.22 2150 Capital Improvements Fund ALL PHASE ELECTRIC SUPPLY COMPANY Supplies 5,000.77 CDW LLC Supplies 7,726.60 CED CONSOLIDATED ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTORS Supplies 733.86 CMS COMMUNICATIONS INC Supplies 2,194.00 EAGLE COUNTY GOVERNMENT-ATTN FINANCE Interfund Payables 11,371.11 ELAM CONSTRUCTION INC Capital 20,273.00 ISC,INC. Capital 34,921.00 MCBOYD BUILDERS,INC. Capital 2,070.00 MENENDEZ ARCHITECTS PC Capital 625.00 ONE SOURCE LIGHTING,INC. Supplies 1,514.50 PAINT BUCKET Supplies 20.40 PARAMOUNT AUDIO VIDEO Capital 60,209.00 PROPERTY IMAGING LLC Services 3,289.00 RUGGS BENEDICK,INC. Services 13,159.92 SECUREWORKS,INC. Supplies 6,100.00 TESSCO INC Supplies 607.18 TOWN OF REDCLIFF Capital 38,715.00 VISA CARD SERVICES Services 297.17 17 01/06/2015 2150 Capital Improvements Fund Total 208,827.51 3600 Landfill Fund AIRGAS INTERMOUNTAIN INC Supplies 249.44 BLUE TARP FINANCIAL,INC. Supplies 200.00 COLLETTS ENTERPRISES,INC. Supplies 1,107.60 COLORADO DEPARTMENT AGRICULTURE Services 465.00 COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIROMEN Services 500.00 COLORADO MOUNTAIN NEWS MEDIA Services 87.22 COPY PLUS Capital 105.00 D&D MANZANARES,INC. Services 1,410.28 EAGLE COUNTY GOVERNMENT-ATTN FINANCE Interfund Payables 320,701.94 EAGLE COUNTY TREASURER Payroll 38,255.94 FERRELL GAS Services 1,137.80 GREAT WEST RETIREMENT SERVICES Payroll 4,982.84 GREAT WEST RETIREMENT SERVICES Payroll 105.46 GREAT WEST RETIREMENT SERVICES Payroll 1,404.00 GREAT WEST RETIREMENT SERVICES Payroll 630.72 HOLY CROSS ENERGY Services 3,649.60 JEREMY ALDRICH Supplies 162.60 KRW CONSULTING Services 18,790.30 KRW CONSULTING Capital 18,377.97 LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY Payroll 159.88 MOUNTAIN ROLL OFF'S,INC. Services 10,605.00 NORTHERN SAFETY COMPANY INC Supplies 322.59 PROFORMA H2R MARKETING GROUP Services 115.00 PST ENTERPRISES INC Supplies 87.54 PST ENTERPRISES INC Supplies 17.27 SATELLITE SHELTERS,INC Services 625.00 STAPLES ADVANTAGE Supplies 39.84 STEVEN WETZEL Supplies 75.00 THE DENVER POST LLC Services 2,996.00 ULTIMATE SPECIALTIES Services 2,084.56 VISA CARD SERVICES Supplies 10.26 VISA CARD SERVICES Supplies 35.76 VLK INC. Services 669.30 WASTEQUIP MANUFACTURING,LLC Capital 3,337.93 WESTERN SLOPE SUPPLIES Services 30.00 WESTERN SLOPE SUPPLIES Supplies 136.20 WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY Supplies 217.04 XEROX CORPORATION,INC Services 485.80 YUCK TRUCK SEPTIC PUMPING,INC Services 1,540.00 3600 Landfill Fund Total 435,913.68 3700 Motor Pool Fund AIRGAS INTERMOUNTAIN INC Services 2,503.76 BAYSHORE TRUCK EQUIPMENT COMPANY Supplies 390.66 BOBCAT OF THE ROCKIES LLC Supplies 9,412.02 BRIDGESTONE AMERICAS,INC Supplies 240.00 18 01/06/2015 BRIDGESTONE AMERICAS,INC Supplies 13,481.04 CCG SYSTEMS,INC Services 3,500.00 CENTRAL DISTRIBUTING Supplies 462.17 CLAIMS SERVICES GROUP INC Services 159.00 COLLETTS ENTERPRISES,INC. Supplies 89,655.71 D&D MANZANARES,INC. Services 82.58 DOCTORS ON CALL Services 170.00 DRIVE TRAIN INDUSTRIES Supplies 3,138.23 EAGLE COUNTY TREASURER Payroll 66,741.43 EATON SALES&SERVICE,LLC. Services 375.10 ELBERT DISTRIBUTING OF COLORADO,INC. Supplies 61.20 ELBERT DISTRIBUTING OF COLORADO,INC. Supplies 54.40 EP BLAZER LLC Supplies 105.52 GILLIG LLC Supplies 4,717.81 GREAT WEST RETIREMENT SERVICES Payroll 7,934.60 GREAT WEST RETIREMENT SERVICES Payroll 0.20 GREAT WEST RETIREMENT SERVICES Payroll 10.00 GREAT WEST RETIREMENT SERVICES Payroll 628.47 H,H&H AUTOMOTIVE PAINT INC Supplies 19.36 H,H&H AUTOMOTIVE PAINT INC Supplies 343.51 HENSLEY BATTERY LLC Supplies 707.55 HOLY CROSS ENERGY Services 1,437.93 HONNEN EQUIPMENT Supplies 474.29 JFMT AUTOMOTIVE GROUP,LLC, Supplies 705.25 LAWSON PRODUCTS,INC Supplies 524.66 LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY Payroll 141.60 MN HUNTER SYSTEMS INC Services 625.00 OFFICE DEPOT Supplies 88.62 OFFICE DEPOT Supplies 45.78 POWER MOTIVE Supplies 117.95 POWER EQUIPMENT COMPANY Supplies 98.49 PRO SHINE,LLC Services 1,878.36 PST ENTERPRISES INC Supplies 127.38 PST ENTERPRISES INC Supplies 3,097.49 SOURCE GAS Services 648.84 STEWART&STEVENSON LLC Supplies 209.62 STEWART&STEVENSON LLC Supplies 796.19 SUMMIT AUTO SERVICE,INC Services 342.00 SUMMIT AUTO SERVICE,INC Supplies 602.00 THE LIGHTHOUSE INC Supplies 87.45 TOWN OF GYPSUM Services 365.41 TOWN OF GYPSUM Services 354.06 UNITED STATES WELDING Services 34.80 VISA CARD SERVICES Services 50.00 VISA CARD SERVICES Services 129.00 VISA CARD SERVICES Supplies 49.98 VISA CARD SERVICES Supplies 79.32 VISA CARD SERVICES Supplies 15.01 WAGEWORKS,INC Payroll 2,463.59 19 01/06/2015 WAGNER EQUIPMENT COMPANY Supplies 1,189.06 WESTERN SLOPE IRON AM)SUPPLY,INC Supplies 102.19 WESTERN SLOPE SUPPLIES Supplies 99.90 XEROX CORPORATION,INC Services 166.85 3700 Motor Pool Fund Total 222,042.39 3730 Insurance Reserve Fund COLORADO COUNTIES CASUALTY AND PROPERTY POOL Services 47.85 EAGLE COUNTY GOVERNMENT-ATTN FINANCE Interfund Payables 40,218.43 3730 Insurance Reserve Fund Total 40,266.28 3790 Health Insurance Fund CAPITAL ONE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION Services 220.01 CNIC HEALTH SOLUTIONS Payroll 76,306.15 EAGLE COUNTY HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Services 450.00 GILSBAR,INC. Payroll 904.50 GLOBAL AFFILIATES,INC Services 2,369.50 HEALTHBREAK,INC. Services 28,512.00 THERE'S NO PLACE LIKE OM Services 940.00 US DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH&HUMAN SERVICES Services 64,197.00 VAIL VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER Services 800.00 VISA CARD SERVICES Services 170.49 WAGEWORKS,INC Payroll 621.00 3790 Health Insurance Fund Total 175,490.65 3900 911 Fund EAGLE COUNTY GOVERNMENT-ATTN FINANCE Interfund Payables 10,772.25 LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES,INC Services 1,401.05 TOWN OF VAIL Services 426,333.00 VISA CARD SERVICES Services 4,851.90 3900 911 Fund Total 443,358.20 Consent Agenda Chairman Ryan stated the first item before the Board was the Consent Agenda as follows: 1. Approval of Bill Paying for the Week of January 5, 2015 (Subject to Review by the Finance Director) John Lewis,Finance Commissioner Chandler-Henry moved to approve the Consent Agenda for January 6, 2015, as presented. Commissioner Ryan seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Citizen Input Chairman Ryan opened and closed citizen Input, as there was none. 20 01/06/2015 Business Items 2. Agreement between Colorado Counties Casualty and Property Pool and Eagle County for Partially Self- Funded Program Jan Miller, Facilities Management Ms. Miller stated that the agreement was due for annual renewal. All departments were covered except the airport. The insurance fund was partially self-funded. The premium was about$800 less than last year.The program was reviewed annually and was a major cost savings. Commissioner Chandler-Henry moved to approve the agreement between Colorado Counties Casualty and Property Pool and Eagle County for Partially Self-Funded Program. Commissioner Ryan seconded the motion. Of the two voting Commissioners,the vote was declared unanimous. 3. Final Settlement of Contract between Eagle County and Elam Construction,Inc. for Construction of the Gypsum to Dotsero Trail Ellie Caryl,ECO Trails Commissioner Chandler-Henry moved to approve the final settlement of contract between Eagle County and Elam Construction,Inc. for construction of the Gypsum to Dotsero Trail. Commissioner Ryan seconded the motion. Of the two voting Commissioners,the vote was declared unanimous. Commissioner Chandler-Henry moved to adjourn as the Eagle County Board of County Commissioners and re-convene as the Eagle County Local Liquor Licensing Authority. Commissioner Ryan seconded the motion. Of the two voting Commissioners,the vote was declared unanimous. Eagle County Liquor License Authority Kathy Scriver, Clerk and Recorder's Office Renewals 4. Connellys,LLC d/b/a E-Town Colorado #47-02610-0000 Renewal of a Hotel and Restaurant License in Edwards. There have been no complaints or disturbances in the past year. All the necessary fees have been paid.An Alcohol Management Plan is on file and proof of server training has been provided. 5. Downtown Brown,LLC d/b/a Café 163 #15-75032-0000 Renewal of a Hotel and Restaurant License in Edwards. There have been no complaints or disturbances in the past year. All the necessary fees have been paid.An Alcohol Management Plan is on file and proof of server training has been provided. 6. Shop&Hop#3,LLC d/b/a Shop &Hop#3 #12-90584-0000 Renewal of a 3.2%Beer Liquor License in Eagle Vail. There have been no complaints or disturbances in the past year. All the necessary fees have been paid. An Alcohol Management Plan is on file and proof of server training has been provided. 7. Vail Valley Foundation d/b/a Vilar Center for Arts 21 01/06/2015 #04-71265-0004 Renewal of an Arts License in Beaver Creek. There have been no complaints or disturbances in the past year. All the necessary fees have been paid. An Alcohol Management Plan is on file and proof of server training has been provided. Commissioner Chandler-Henry moved that the Board approve the Liquor Consent Agenda for January 6, 2015, as presented. Commissioner Ryan seconded the motion. Of the two voting Commissioners,the vote was declared unanimous. Commissioner Chandler-Henry moved to adjourn as the Eagle County Liquor Licensing Authority and re- convene as the Board of County Commissioners. Commissioner Ryan seconded the motion. Of the two voting Commissioners,the vote was declared unanimous. Executive Session —Personnel Matter Jacci McKenna,Human Resources Site Visit TNT Ranch Botanicals Marijuana Cultivation 11157 Gypsum Creek Road, Gypsum, CO Planning File Eagle County Room 8. ZS5032—TNT Ranch Botanicals Marijuana Cultivation Scot Hunn,Planning Greg Schroeder, Engineering Robert Trotter, Applicant Chris Green,Representative Action: The purpose of this Special Use Permit is to operate a marijuana cultivation facility, inclusive of up to 10,000 sq. ft. of greenhouse production/cultivation area, as well as up to 2 acres of outdoor cultivation on a 384 acre tract of land within the Resource Zone District. Location: 11157 Gypsum Creek Road, Gypsum Area FILE NO./PROCESS: ZS-5032/Special Use Permit PROJECT NAME: TNT Ranch Botanicals Marijuana Cultivation Facility LOCATION: 11.25 miles south of Gypsum; 11157 Gypsum Creek Road OWNER: Robert Trotter APPLICANT: Same REPRESENTATIVE: Chris Green,AGO Studio STAFF PLANNER: Scot Hunn,AICP STAFF ENGINEER: Greg Schroeder 22 01/06/2015 RECOMMENDATION: Approval with Conditions I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Request and Process The Applicant requests review of a Special Use Permit for a marijuana cultivation facility consisting of up to six(6) 1,200-2,000 square foot greenhouse structures and the use of approximately 1,500 square feet of existing barn(for a total of 10,000 square feet) for propagation, storage, drying, curing and packaging facilities. Additionally, the Applicant proposes up to 2 acres* of open-air, outdoor cultivation on this 384 acre parcel located in the Resource Zone District. The proposed footprint of the green house facilities is approximately 1.5 acres, or 65,340 square feet; this represents approximately .4 percent of the total land area. *Note: While the original application requested up to twelve(12) acres of outdoor cultivation on the"upper bench" of the subject property,the Applicant now proposes to use no more than two (2) acres of land in this same area for outdoor cultivation. The decrease in proposed acreage of outdoor cultivation does not require re-referral or re- submittal of the proposal.An updated site map is attached showing the reduced outdoor cultivation area. Additionally, the application states that manufacturing (extraction and/or the manufacturing of infused products) could be a proposed use in the future,but is not being proposed at this time. If, in the future,the Applicant proposes manufacturing uses on the subject property, a new Special Use Permit will be required as well as local licensing from the Eagle County Marijuana Business Licensing Authority. The proposal includes evidence of adequate water resources, as well as adequate public facilities, access and proper site planning in relation to site development standards. With the exception of minor encroachments of a planned internal access driveway within the 75' stream setback to Gypsum Creek, staff believes all proposed improvements will conform to zoning requirements and dimensional limitations. The Applicant is aware of this encroachment and plans to revise plans to ensure the access driveway/road is not within the setback. Additionally, staff believes the proposal meets, or can meet as conditioned, all applicable standards for Special Use Review, as well as for Cultivation of Marijuana.Therefore, staff is recommending approval,with conditions. The Eagle County Planning Commission conducted a site visit and public hearing on November 19, 2014; the Commission voted 6-1 to recommend approval with conditions. Marijuana Business Regulatory Background in Eagle County Effective January 1, 2014, marijuana cultivation, manufacturing or testing uses became lawful in unincorporated Eagle County as a use `by right' in the Commercial General (CG) and Commercial Limited (CL) Zone Districts. Such uses may also be permitted upon approval of a Special Use Permit in three rural zone districts in unincorporated Eagle County: Resource (35 acre minimum lot size); Resource Limited(20 acre minimum lot size), and; Agricultural Residential(10 acre minimum lot size). Although cultivation uses are `by right' in the commercial zone districts of unincorporated Eagle County, commercial space (typically located in close proximity to population centers, dining, retail and service/office uses) does not necessarily lend itself well to cultivating marijuana due to compatibility issues that arise from odors and odor mitigation (air handling systems and filtration). Of particular interest when considering whether to permit cultivation operations in the County's three most-rural zone districts was the goal of encouraging appropriately scaled cultivation operations (and any associated odors or other potential impacts) in settings where ample buffering distances are more likely to be provided as a result of large lot zoning. Therefore, the permitting of marijuana cultivation uses in rural, agricultural zone districts can generally be viewed as appropriate if properly vetted and conditioned through local licensing and Special Use Permit processes. Such 23 01/06/2015 view is based in part upon the agrarian nature of cultivation uses and associated structures, as well as the separation distances between cultivation facilities and adjacent properties provided in large lot subdivisions. Yet, cultivation of marijuana, if not properly vetted, is also a use that may pose compatibility issues. As such, the purpose of a Special Use Review is as follows: "Special Uses are those uses that are not necessarily compatible with the other uses allowed in a zone district, but which may be determined compatible with the other uses allowed in the zone district based upon individual review of their location, design, configuration, density and intensity of use, and the imposition of appropriate conditions to ensure the compatibility of the use at a particular location with surrounding land uses. All Special Uses shall meet the standards set forth in this Section."-ECLURs p. 5-51 While there are no specific size limits on such operations, standards have been developed specifically for marijuana cultivation, focusing on maintaining a"rural scale" and character for any development through design, maintaining minimum separation distances between cultivation facilities and neighboring properties, as well as ensuring adequate water rights, odor mitigation (if deemed necessary), screening and landscaping (if visible from public rights-of-way). Therefore, in addition to addressing the standards for Special Use Review (Section 5-250 — Special Uses, Eagle County Land Use Regulations) listed below, the Applicant is responsible for demonstrating substantial conformance to each of the standards outlined for marijuana cultivation found in Section 3-310, F.f—Marijuana Cultivation, Manufacturing or Testing, ECLURs. Report Organization and Recommendation The following sections of this report provide a brief background regarding the request(s), referral agency responses, staff review of the requests, potential issues, as well as an outline of standards for approval with brief responses from staff as to how/why the proposal meets or does not meet applicable standards. An appendix section is attached, containing an in-depth examination of all applicable review and approval standards. Staff is recommending approval, with conditions for this Special Use Permit request. II. BACKGROUND: Proposal Overview The Applicant proposes the phased construction of a marijuana cultivation facility inclusive of new greenhouse structures and outdoor cultivation areas. According to the application, the facility will consist of between four (4) and six (6) new greenhouse structures located on the "lower bench" of the subject property near an existing single-family home and associated "accessory"agricultural uses and buildings. The total indoor cultivation square footage in this lower area is will not exceed 8,500 square feet. The Applicant is still determining final design and layout of the greenhouse improvements and, therefore, the total number of new structures remains in flux. The site plan also shows areas around the greenhouse structures that could be used for storage of soils and other materials, all located within an 8- foot high perimeter fence along with a small parking area for employees. Additionally, the Applicant proposes to use approximately 1,500 square feet of existing barn located just south of the existing residence for propagation purposes, bringing the total square footage of indoor cultivation area at full build-out to approximately 10,000 square feet. The total footprint (total site disturbance) proposed for the new greenhouse structures and associated disturbance is estimated at 1.5 acres, or approximately .4 percent of the total acreage. The Applicant also requests approval for up to two (2) acres of outdoor cultivation area, to be planted in an existing meadow on the "upper bench" of the ranch property. The application originally stated that twelve (12) acres of 24 01/06/2015 outdoor cultivation was proposed; however, due to the regulatory issues at the State level, the Applicant now revises his request, and proposes to limit the total acreage of outdoor cultivation to two (2) acres in the same general area. The Applicant possesses senior water rights and the property includes a 12 acre foot reservoir. Water for irrigation and domestic use is piped from this pond. Specific hours of operation have not been proposed,however the application states, "The hours of operation for the areas in this application will vary. Greenhouse operations will primarily be handled by the applicant and employees during a work day arrangement with evening and weekend hours as required to monitor and to provide cultivation support. Outdoor cultivation operations will be similar to existing haying operations with initial activity during planning, maintenance and observation of the crop, and harvesting of the crop." Further, the application provides a basic overview of security - to be provided according to State of Colorado Department of Revenue (Marijuana Enforcement Division) requirements - inclusive of fencing around both the greenhouse operations, as well as any outdoor growing areas, security cameras, and monitoring of alarms and motion detectors by a private security company. Specific details of floor plans and security measures will be required when the Applicant applies for local licensing for cultivation as well as with associated building permit application processes. Review Timeline and Issues This request was formally submitted on July 25, 2014. However, the Applicant has been meeting with representatives from Eagle County and other local entities since March, 2014, to address water rights issues, building and fire code requirements for greenhouse structures, as well as engineering and wildfire mitigation issues related to access. The proposal was referred to twenty-four(29) different public, quasi-public and private organizations, for review over a 21 day period,with only four entities(the Gypsum Fire Protection District, Colorado Parks&Wildlife Division, or"CPW",the Colorado Historical Society, and the Colorado Division of Water Resources, or"DNR") providing formal, substantive responses to the referral. Of those responses, only the Gypsum Fire Protection District's recommendations for design and mitigation within the project resulted in any substantive(recommended) conditions of approval. Impacts and Tradeoffs Staff believes the potential for negative impacts from this proposal is minimal, given the size, scope and location of the facility relative to the surrounding area. However, areas of potential impact include effects from the proposal on mapped wildlife habitats and ranges, as well as the potential for increased traffic on local roadways. Such impacts could be weighed against: 1) Similar or greater potential for impacts generated from uses `by right' within the Resource Zone District; 2) The potential benefits to the local community and economy resulting from the special use, and; 3) The proposal's overall conformance to applicable goals and policies of Eagle County Government. For example, although the prospect of employees traveling to and from the site on a daily basis may present an increase to the traffic currently traveling to and from the site, the total estimated traffic from up to three employees did not warrant additional traffic studies or mitigation. Additionally, `by right' uses in the Resource Zone District such as horse boarding or riding stables,may be viewed as generating similar or greater impacts. 25 01/06/2015 Staff did not receive any referral response from the Colorado Parks and Wildlife Division, however the subject property does contain mapped wildlife areas, mainly for deer and elk"overall range" and(elk)production areas, as well as bear"summer concentration areas." Eagle County — via the Eagle County Comprehensive Plan - places a high value minimizing impacts from development on land resources through design while promoting the economic, cultural and social goals through the continuance of agriculture and open space uses in rural areas of the county. Related goals for protecting and enhancing wildlife habitat act to direct development away from sensitive or hazardous land forms,water bodies and critical wildlife habitats. In this regard, staff suggests that the Applicant's proposed project is in substantial conformance with the master plan policies and strategies considered in this review due to its limited size and scope (1.5 acres out of a 384 acre tract, or.4% of the total land area) for proposed greenhouse construction. In this sense, staff believes the placement of greenhouse structures, as well as the size and location of proposed outdoor growing operations — both in areas previously disturbed and/or used for historic agricultural activities -presents minimal disturbance in the short and long-term. Likewise, staff believes the proposal may have a positive impact on goals and policies directed at maintaining rural,agricultural economies and lifestyles. As such, wildlife impacts or the potential for increased traffic and/or human activity may represent a tradeoff and could be viewed in context to the potential benefits provided by the proposal, as well as potential impacts that could occur given existing and future `by right' rural residential and agricultural uses in the area. Based on the above analysis, the Planning Commission's review of the proposal, as well as referral agency comments and, importantly, considering the Applicant's ability to incorporate referral agency comments into the design of the project or the facility's operations planning (such as providing wildlife proof trash containment strategies and clustering development within limited portions of the parcel), staff finds that the proposal meets a preponderance of master plan goals and policies and complies with applicable standards for approval as summarized below. III. PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATION: The Eagle County Planning Commission met on November 19, 2014, to consider the request and to conduct a site visit to the subject property. The Planning Commission voted 6-1 to recommend approval,with conditions. During the meeting on the 19`h, the commission members discussed aspects of facility design, inclusive of the layout of proposed greenhouse structures, security measures and emergency response, and lighting. One commission member inquired about lighting needed for certain operations such as indoor cultivation and potential extraction activities; he asked whether indoor activities that could be run at all hours of the day or night would require additional lighting. The Applicant stated that although no extraction activities are being proposed at this time, extraction could occur at night but without lighting(no lighting is needed for extraction machinery to run g ry unattended during nighttime hours, for instance). The Applicant added that greenhouses would be shielded from most public view angles by virtue of the layout and design, which includes burying the greenhouses into the site and providing berming, and that lighting will be limited based on the schedules for"vegetation"and flowering. Another commission member suggested a new condition (Number 8) added to require the Applicant to provide an operations plan stipulating the hours of operation, as well as general time frames for indoor and outdoor lighting associated with the special use to limit the hours when exterior lighting associated with cultivation can be utilized. Another commission member inquired about the market for medical marijuana; he asked if the Applicant would grow retail marijuana in times when demand for medical marijuana was low. The Applicant answered affirmatively,that he would seek to cultivate retail marijuana in the absence of a medical marijuana market. Lastly, one member inquired as to how the emergency response plan would work; he asked whether or not the emergency providers had a "plan" for responding to fire or other types of events. He suggested that although 26 01/06/2015 representatives from the Gypsum Fire Protection District had met with the Applicant and confirmed that the District's concerns had been addressed, the Applicant and the District should ensure that any response "plan" be coordinated prior to the facility becoming fully operational. IV. STAFF FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION: Staff is recommending approval of this application,with conditions. Staff believes the proposal, as conditioned meets or exceeds all applicable standards for a Special Use Permit, as well as those standards specific to Marijuana Cultivation Facilities. (A comprehensive review and analysis of all applicable comprehensive plan goals and land use standards follows this report, in the Appendix). Special Use Standards Specifically, the following excerpts from Section 5-250 B — Standards, ECLURs provide direction regarding the intent and necessary findings for the approval of any Special Use Review, as well as the specific standards for marijuana cultivation and variations to improvement standards that are to be addressed. Likewise, the following section provides brief responses (provided in greater detail in the"Appendix" section of this report) from staff as to how staff believes the application meets or does not meet a particular standard, as well as suggested mitigation measures(conditions): 1. Consistent with Comprehensive Plan. The proposed Special Use shall be in substantial conformance with the Eagle County Comprehensive Plan, Area Community Plans and any applicable ancillary County adopted documents pertaining to natural resource protection, affordable housing, or infrastructure management. Staff Response: Staff believes the proposal is in substantial conformance with all applicable plans and adopted policy documents. Specifically, the proposal was reviewed against relevant guiding policies, goals, and recommended implementation strategies of the Eagle County Comprehensive Plan. 2. Compatibility. The Special Use is generally compatible with the existing and currently permissible future uses of adjacent land and other substantially impacted land, services, or infrastructure improvements. Staff Response: Staff believes the proposal, as represented by the Applicant and as mitigated using recommended conditions of approval, will be compatible with existing and future low density, agricultural uses surrounding the subject property. Further, staff believes the proposed design and scale of the proposed use will have minimal impacts on land, services or infrastructure in the area and, specifically, are proposed to be compatible with agricultural character of the area. 3. Zone District Standards. The proposed Special Use shall comply with the standards of the zone district in which it is located and any standards applicable to the particular use, as identified in Section 3-310, Review Standards Applicable to Particular Residential, Agricultural and Resource Uses and Section 3-330, Review Standards Applicable to Particular Commercial and Industrial Uses. Staff Response: Staff believes the proposal is in substantial conformance with the specific standards for marijuana cultivation set forth in Section 3-310, F.f — Marijuana Cultivation, Manufacturing, or Testing, ECLURs. 4. Design Minimizes Adverse Impact. The design of the proposed Special Use shall reasonably avoid adverse impacts, including visual impacts of the proposed use on adjacent lands including 27 01/06/2015 .......... . trash, traffic, service delivery,parking and loading, odors, noise, glare, and vibration, or otherwise create a nuisance. Staff Response: Staff believes the proposal, as conditioned, meets this standard. Specifically, staff suggests that the project has been designed specifically to minimize any adverse impacts to the subject property, the surrounding area, residents and wildlife populations and that recommended conditions of approval will bolster compliance with this standard. However, staff is also recommending that the Applicant provide detailed site, grading, erosion control and landscaping plans at the time of building permit; likewise, staff is recommending that the Applicant provide a construction management plan to ensure that areas proposed for greenhouse construction are properly fenced and/or secure and that short-term construction impacts to the land are properly mitigated. S. Design Minimizes Environmental Impact. The proposed Special Use shall minimize environmental impacts and shall not cause significant deterioration of water and air resources, wildlife habitat, scenic resources, and other natural resources. Staff Response: Staff believes the proposal substantially meets this standard. Specifically, while there will be direct impacts to mapped wildlife habitats as a result of development of approximately 1.5 acres, the project—the greenhouse design and site layout-has been designed to reduce the amount of energy needed to operate the facility by maximizing thermal mass and solar orientation (orienting the greenhouse structures from east to west across the site to capture sunlight efficiently) and respecting stream setbacks and riparian areas. Further, the proposed bulk, mass and architectural intent of each structure acts to protect scenic resources by maintaining a low,utilitarian profile as viewed from Gypsum Creek Road. Recommended conditions of approval including the provision of a construction management plan, site specific grading, drainage and erosion control plans, and a requirement for downcast lighting act to bolster complicance with this standard. 6. Impact on Public Facilities. The proposed Special Use shall be adequately served by public facilities and services, including roads, pedestrian paths,potable water and wastewater facilities, parks, schools,police and fire protection, and emergency medical services. Staff Response: Staff believes the proposal meets this standard, as conditioned. The public facilities and/or services impacted will be public roadways, police and fire protection services, and emergency medical services. This application was referred to several law enforcement and/or emergency response agencies, including the Gypsum Fire Protection District. The Applicant has met with representatives from the Gypsum Fire Protection District to resolve specific concerns regarding Dual Access requirements, wildfire mitigation planning, and firefighting capacity. It is expected that traffic generation from the use will be minimal; potentially less than that generated from a residential use. 7. Site Development Standards. The proposed Special Use shall comply with the appropriate standards in Article 4, Site Development Standards. Staff Response: Staff believes the proposal meets this standard. Specifically, existing and proposed parking has been designed to meet the requirements of Article 4, as have preliminary designs for grading, drainage, erosion control,landscaping, and lighting improvements. Likewise,no signs are proposed (or permitted)with this type of special use request, wildlife impacts have generally been taken into 28 01/06/2015 account through the design of the project; wildfire and other hazards have been addressed or are not applicable,and the project is not located in a mapped ridgeline. 8. Other Provisions. The proposed Special Use shall comply with all standards imposed on it by all other applicable provisions of these Land Use Regulations for use, layout, and general development characteristics. Staff Response: Staff believes the proposal meets this standard. Specifically, the proposal has been designed, revised during the review and referral process, and/or conditioned to meet the specific standards for marijuana cultivation facilities as set forth in Section 3-310, F.f. — Marijuana Cultivation, Manufacturing, or Testing,ECLURs. Cultivation Standards In addition to the standards listed above, cultivation facilities within the Resource Zone District must also meet the following standards specific to the cultivation of marijauna. Below is a summary of the standards and staff's response to how such standards have been, or can be,met. Section 3-310 F.f—Marijuana Cultivation,Manufacturing or Testing: 1. Separation Requirements: separation distances of at least 200 feet between the proposed use and the next nearest single-family residential structure have been met. 2. Minimum Lot Size: the parcel meets the minimum lot size (35 acres)for the Resource Zone District; in this case, 384 acres. 3. Parking and Storage:parking and storage have been designed to meet the standards. 4. Signs and Illumination: there are no marijuana business signs proposed for the site or the operations and only minimal lighting is proposed for the exterior of buildings to comply with building code requirements. 5. Sales: no retail sales are proposed(or permitted) on or from the site. 6. Visual Screening: a fencing and landscaping plan has been submitted which, if implemented as proposed, should act to provide visual screening even though the greenhouse structures will likely not be visible from public rights-of-way; staff believes that the scale and layout of the facility is appropriate in context to the character of the surrounding area. 7. Scale: The use and layout of the subject shall be at a scale that retains a rural character of the immediate vicinity, and which maximizes open space on the subject property. Staff believes the proposal, as designed and as conditioned via this Special Use Request, will maintain rural, agricultural scale and character by virtue of the low-slung nature of the proposed greenhouse structures, the use of existing barn/accessory buildings for cultivation and propagation, and the use of outdoor cultivation in an area that is currently irrigated and cultivated as alfalfa. 8. Adequate Water: evidence of adequate water rights has been submitted and, via correspondence with the State Division of Water Resources, staff believes that the Applicant has demonstrated that there will be legal,physical, adequate and dependable water supply for the cultivation facility. 9. Wildfire Hazard: the Applicant has met with the Eagle County Wildfire Mitigation Specialist and has received a wildfire rating of"low". 29 01/06/2015 10. Access: legal access is provided via Gypsum Creek Road and the total estimated vehicle trips by employees and owners of the facility did not warrant additional traffic studies. The road is maintained by Eagle County year-round. 11. Odor Mitigation Plan: at this time, due primarily to the location of this marijuana business, and the resultant proximity (distances) to other residential or agricultural uses, staff has not required an Odor Mitigation Plan for the project. However, the Applicant has indicated that mitigation such as carbon filtration systems could be installed within each greenhouse structure if needed in the future. 12. Security: although the Applicant has provided information regarding proposed fencing locations and heights, as well as basic details regarding security (cameras and lighting) on the site, all security requirements are a matter of State review and permitting. However, the Applicant should be prepared to address how on-site security and, particularly, monitoring by a local security company, will protect the property and the security of neighboring properties. Likewise, all final details regarding security cameras and monitoring will be required as part of any application for local licensing to cultivate marijuana (a separate license issued by Eagle County Marijuana Business Licensing Authority). Summary Analysis Set against this policy and regulatory background, the Applicant is the third property owner in Eagle County to apply for a marijuana cultivation facility Special Use Permit in a rural zone district since enactment of the revised regulations allowing for such use. To this end, the Applicant's representative participated in the application and review of the first two applications, and has been in meetings with Eagle County staff for the previous six to nine months for the purpose of first understanding the regulatory environment, and to ensure that plans for the cultivation facility (and ultimately the Special Use Permit application) were informed by staff input as well as a thorough understanding of technical submittal and performance requirements. Specifically, the Applicant and his representative has met with, or contacted personnel from the Eagle County Building Department, Engineering Department, Environmental Health Planning Department, and Wildfire Mitigation to identify and resolve regulatory and code-related issues—prior to submitting an application. Of note, the Applicant and his representative have met with the Gypsum Fire Protection District personnel (Fire Chief, Justin Kirkland), the Eagle County Engineering Department (Greg Schroeder), and the Eagle County Wildfire Mitigation Specialist (Eric Lovgren) to assess and resolve issues identified during the review of the proposal. The proposal has been reviewed against the strategic policies and goals identified within the Eagle County Comprehensive Plan, and staff has found ample evidence to support approval of the proposal. Overall,while there may be impacts from the proposed use—on local wildlife populations and from traffic—the proposal appears to meet or exceed all applicable standards. Likewise,the Applicant has demonstrated the ability and willingness to act on recommendations provided by County staff and other agencies to minimize the impact of the project and to ensure compatibility with neighboring properties while respecting the rural character of the area. Recommendation: Approval,with Conditions Based upon a thorough analysis of the proposal—by county staff and key external agencies - staff is recommending a pp roval of the request. Specifically, staff believes that the proposal addresses a preponderance of applicable master plan goals, policies and strategies. Additionally, staff believes the proposal meets, or can meet (if properly conditioned), all required standards and findings necessary for the issuance of a Special Use Permit for Marijuana Cultivation in the Resource Zone District. However, because this would be only the third such proposal approved in unincorporated Eagle County, staff recommends a cautious approach to vesting. Section 5-250, E — Conditions and Restrictions on a Special Use Permit(ECLURs,p. 5-55)is pertinent to any consideration of conditional approval,wherein: 30 01/06/2015 "The Planning Commission may recommend and the Board of County Commissioners may, in approving any Special Use Permit, impose such restrictions and conditions on such approval, the proposed use, and the premises to be developed or used pursuant to such approval, as it determines are required by the general purposes, goals, objectives, and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, the FLUM of the Comprehensive Plan, and these Land Use Regulations, to prevent or minimize adverse effects from the proposed development on surrounding land uses and on the general health, safety, and welfare of the County. The County shall be authorized to set limits on the length of any Final or Consolidated Special Use Permit that it issues and to obtain assurances that the ongoing operation of the use will comply with all of the applicant's representations and all conditions of approval, including, but not limited to, requiring an annual compliance review. All conditions imposed in any Special Use Permit, with the exception of conditions made applicable to such approval by the express terms of these Land Use Regulations, shall be expressly set forth in the Special Use Permit." As such, staff recommends the following conditions crafted specifically to address development standards; performance standards such as lighting, drainage and landscaping, and; recommendations by the Gypsum Fire Protection District. V. SUGGESTED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: The following conditions have been developed following review of the request(s)by the Eagle County Engineering Department, the Eagle County Planning Department, the Eagle County Planning Commission, and in consultation with certain referral agencies: 1. Except as otherwise modified by this development permit, all material representations made by the Applicant in this application and in public meeting shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval. 2. Any new lighting associated with the special use shall be downcast in accordance with dark/night- sky compliant lighting standards; specifically, any on-site lighting shall be designed and installed so as not to direct glare onto adjacent properties. 3. The Applicant shall provide a Construction Management Plan with any building or grading permit application. 4. The Applicant shall successfully apply for and obtain any and all state and local licensing required for the cultivation and/or manufacturing of marijuana (Cultivation License or Manufacturing License if proposed in the future) for the cultivation facility prior to commencing any cultivation or manufacturing activities. 5. Pursuant to local and state licensing requirements specific to renewal of licensing and annual verification of`good standing',the Applicant shall provide a brief report or other evidence to Eagle County Planning Department on an annual basis, demonstrating that the license for cultivation i s valid at both the state and local levels, and, therefore, that the special use permit remains in compliance with local regulations as well as applicable conditions of approval for the special use. 6. The Applicant shall provide a detailed grading plan, showing existing and proposed grades, as well as proposed limits of disturbance, drainage and erosion control measures for the site prior to or concurrent with any grading and/or building permit application. 7. The Applicant shall coordinate building permit review with both the Eagle County Building Division and the Gypsum Fire Protection District, prior to submitting building permit plans to Eagle County. 31 01/06/2015 8. The Applicant shall provide an Operations Plan stipulating the hours of operation, as well as general time frames for indoor and outdoor lighting associated with the special use. 9. The Applicant shall provide an Emergency Response Plan, drafted in coordination with the Gypsum Fire Protection District, prior to commencing operation of the facility. Any Emergency Response Plan created for this special use shall be updated upon any significant or substantial change in operation(s)of the facility requiring any new special use permit review. VI. SITE DATA: The project site is located approximately 11.25 miles south of the Town of Gypsum on a 384 acre un-platted ranch property. The site is bordered by United States Forest Service lands to the north, west and south; and by private property to the east. Future Land Use Map The Eagle County Comprehensive Plan, Future Land Use Map, identifies the subject property and surrounding lands as"Rural." Surrounding Land Uses/Zoning: The subject property as well as surrounding lands are zoned Resource. Land Zon i1r • "',�v! v f ,. i � • .v .i w..., nS: .-, 'rT�a. t?'a�i �, North: Residential/Agricultural Resource(R) South: Residential/Agricultural Resource(R) East: Residential/Agricultural Resource(R) West: Residential/Agricultural Resource(R) m Resource Zone District ,r4141.1.14 Proposed Z N/A Single-Family Residence; caretaker unit; barns and other accessory structures; grazing and reatreailt open range. dI YltliSt:; Sage,grass;moderate slopes. a tut alit y r; 384 q r a;. Tom srpoi' r 1licM N/A .Private: Well Sew' et r Mlle:, , N/A _ OWTS 4�8 Gypsum Creek Road VII. REFERRAL RESPONSES: Referral copies of this application were sent to twenty-nine (29) agencies for review on September 22, 2014. The following section summarizes the comments of all agencies that submitted an official referral response to Eagle County prior to the date of this report. Please see attached referral agency response letters/ for full text of each response: Colorado DNR, Water Resources Division (Ivan Franco): This office has received supplemental information for the proposed marijuana greenhouse facility at 11157 Gypsum Creek Road in Gypsum. This office responded to the original referral on October 14,2014 (attached below). On October 21,2014 the applicant responded to this office's concerns via email.The following is a brief outline of the concerns raised by this office and the applicant's response. The applicant has clarified that the present intent is to construction a greenhouse facility up to 10,000 square-feet in size, and no longer intends to openly convert 12 acres of irrigated pasture to marijuana crop at this time.The greenhouse will be constructed on lands that are currently irrigated by a number of surface water rights. When water is in priority the Y&V number 4 ditch,Trotter Diversion and Van Horn Ditch No. 1 will continue to supply irrigation water. 32 01/06/2015 - The applicant also intends to utilize the undecreed TNT Ranch Reservoir No. 1 (White Hawk Pond),a 12 acre-foot bentonite lined pond, filled under free river to supply water during the non-irrigation season.The applicant has calculated that the total storage in the pond is approximately three times the total annual water supply required by the cultivation operation. In the event that legal water supplies are unavailable the cultivation operation will be curtailed. - The applicant's proposal to operate a greenhouse facility on legally irrigated lands and utilize an onsite pond filled during free river is acceptable. However, on critically dry years the water supply may not be sufficient for a full fill. The applicant should anticipate and prepare for possible water supply interruptions. So long as the water used at the facility is obtained from the legal sources outlined herein and further described in the original referral,this office has no further objections to the application. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me at this office. Colorado State Historical Society(Edward Nichols): - There is at least one historic building(older than 50 years old)within the subject property. - There may be other structures or"features"that are also more than 50 years old on the property - The property has not been surveyed for historic or prehistoric archeological resources. - There remains a possibility that historic and/or prehistoric resources may exist on the properly which resources may be affected by the project; if found during construction,please adhere to state law. Gypsum Fire Protection District(Justin Kirkland): - It has been our experience that the county does not adequately maintain the road past approximately mile 8 in the winter and what fire access will be available for our 2 wheel drive Fire Engines? - Wildfire mitigation: I would like to see an engineering report on the product and its fire behavior arid rate of spread.How will it behave when an adjacent fire moves thru or if a fire starts in the product? - What risk of exposure exists when the products are on fire both in the green house and in the outdoor cultivation?I have concerns for fire fighters attacking a product fire. Breathing apparatus is not practical for vegetation fires. - Hydrant/water supply needs to be verified. Freeze proof? - How does this application address the counties building classification of this product\process to be a F2 classification? - Chemical/pesticides use and storage? - Commercial traffic on Gypsum Creek Rd?What size of trucks will be access the property on the non- maintained roads?Will this create risk for obstructed roadways or rescue needs for motor vehicle accidents? - Any plans for fire protection/detection in Green houses? - They mention firefighting equipment on site, can they elaborate? - Our current county radio system does not have adequate radio coverage in the upper drainage for Gypsum Creek. This was proven by the murder incident, CPR medical incidents and fatal MVA's in recent years. Development and commercial operations create more call volume and not having communications creates risk to responders. - I understand that extraction is not planned for the 1st phase but if this becomes a possibility I have numerous concerns on the process. Note: Please see detailed response from Applicant to the GFPD, as well as copies of emails from Chief Kirkland with regard to the Applicant addressing GFPD questions and concerns (attached). VIII. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OPTIONS: 1. Approve [File No. ZS-50321 with conditions and/or performance standards if it is determined that certain conditions and/or performance standards are necessary to ensure public, health, safety, and welfare and/or enhances the attunement of the use with the immediately adjacent and nearby neighborhood properties and uses and the proposal is in compliance with both the Eagle County Land Use Regulations and with the guidelines of the Eagle County Comprehensive Plan(and/or other applicable master plans), 33 01/06/2015 2. Deny [File No. ZS-50321 if it is determined that the petition will adversely affect the public health, safety, and welfare and/or the proposed use is not attuned with the immediately adjacent and nearby neighborhood properties and uses and the proposal is not in compliance with both the Eagle County Land Use Regulations and with the guidelines of the Eagle County Comprehensive Plan(and/or other applicable master plans). 3. Table [File No. ZS-50321 if additional information is required to fully evaluate the petition. Give specific direction to the petitioner and staff with regard to additional requested information. APPENDIX `A' 1. NECESSARY FINDINGS: ECLUR Section: 5-250 Special Use Permits Section Purpose: Special Uses are those uses that are not necessarily compatible with the other uses allowed in a zone district, but which may be determined compatible with the other uses allowed in the zone district based upon individual review of their location, design, configuration, density and intensity of use, and the imposition of appropriate conditions to ensure the compatibility of the use at a particular location with surrounding land uses. All Special Uses shall meet the standards set forth in this Section. Standards: Section 5-250.B. The issuance of a Special Use Permit shall be dependent upon fmdings that there is competent evidence that the proposed use as conditioned, fully complies with all the standards of this Section, this Division, this Article, and these Land Use Regulations. The Planning Commission may recommend and the Board of County Commissioners may attach any conditions deemed appropriate to ensure compliance with the following standards, including conformity to a specific site plan, requirements to improve public facilities necessary to serve the Special Use, and limitations on the operating characteristics of the use, or the location or duration of the Special Use Permit STANDARD: Consistent with Comprehensive Plan. [Section 5-250.B.1] The proposed Special Use shall be in substantial conformance with the Eagle County Comprehensive Plan, Area Community Plans and any applicable ancillary County adopted documents pertaining to natural resource protection, affordable housing, or infrastructure management. Staff Response: Staff believes the proposal meets the majority of applicable Comprehensive Plan goals, objectives and policies, inclusive of those specific to the Missouri Heights Character Area of the Mid-Valley Area Community Plan. Below, staff has analyzed the proposal against the Eagle County Comprehensive Plan (2006), as well as the Mid-Valley Area Community Plan (2013), with a focus on development (land use), water, environmental and economic aspects of both plans. Eagle County Comprehensive Plan The Eagle County Comprehensive Plan was adopted in 2006 and includes specific policies and implementation strategies for unincorporated Eagle County and specifically those areas not included within sub-area master plans such as the Mid-Valley Area Community Plan. The Comprehensive Plan provides overarching policy and implementation direction in the following areas of strategic im p ortance for Eagle County: 1. Governance 2. Development 3. Economic Resources 34 01/06/2015 4. Housing 5. Infrastructure and Services 6. Water Resources 7. Wildlife Resources 8. Sensitive Lands 9. Environmental Quality The Eagle County Comprehensive Plan clearly and specifically supports the preservation of agricultural uses in rural areas of the County. Likewise, certain Comprehensive Plan goals and strategies support diversification of local "economic infrastructure", while others provide direction for protecting the environment and reducing impacts from new development proposals. Many policies of the Comprehensive Plan are not germane to the review of the proposed use(s). Therefore, staff's analysis of the Comprehensive Plan focuses primarily upon the overarching intents and policies of each strategy area applicable to the current proposal. Specifically, the following section highlights those policies, goals and recommended strategies related to Development; Economic Resources; Infrastructure and Services; Water Resources; Wildlife Resources; Sensitive Lands, and; Environmental Quality. 3.2.6- General Development: Policy "a"— Those attributes that support quality of life options unique to Eagle County today should be preserved for future generations. Applicable Recommended Strategies: • Ensure that all plans for development recognize the need to preserve the natural beauty and environmental integrity of Eagle County. Staff Response: The proposal has been sized and designed to work with the site topography, access, drainage and screening. Specifically, overall grading and disturbance (cutting and filling) has been minimized, while the orientation of the structures maximizes solar access to capture more of the sun's energy for cultivation (reducing the amount of electrical energy needed to power the facility). Staff suggests that the overall footprint of the development is small in comparison to the total acreage of the parcel, and the design maintains rural scale and character. • Work to preserve vestiges of the County's western heritage and the rural quality of life found in outlying areas of the county. Staff Response: The proposed use should be considered agricultural in nature and, therefore, could also be viewed favorably in context to the stated strategy of preserving western heritage. As designed and with appropriate conditions of approval, this special use permit should not adversely affect the quality of life for this area of Eagle County, but may, instead,provide a means to maintain a rural, agricultural way of life in this area of the County. Policy "c"— Growth should be managed toward future sustainability—a healthy balance between economic success, quality of life, and the preservation of the environment. Applicable Recommended Strategies: • Ensure that all plans for development recognize the need to maintain a healthy economy. Staff Response: The proposed facility will principally employ approximately 3 persons in addition to the business owner and his family in a bona fide agricultural industry. The proposed use adds to the health of Eagle County's overall economy 35 01/06/2015 through the creation of jobs,the creation of trade and taxation(property and sales tax), and the support of ancillary businesses and industries associated with the marijuana industry. Policy "j"- Development should be fully responsible for the mitigation of development related impacts upon both the natural and built environment. Applicable Recommended Strategies: • Assure that each development application fits the policies and applicable mapping of all master plans and area community plans. Staff Response: The area is designated as"Rural"on the Eagle County Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map(FLUM).As such,the Plan states that the Rural Land designation, "includes private properties in unincorporated Eagle County which can be categorized as ranch, open range or forested lands."Further, the Plan states, "Rural lands rely on nearby Community Centers or Rural Centers to serve their daily needs, with commercial activities being limited to isolated uses which are only permitted by special review... "Therefore, staff believes the proposal conforms to this overall description of rural lands designation. • Design and locate development to minimize and/or mitigate identified impacts. Staff Response: Staff believes the proposal has been located and designed to lessen overall footprint/disturbance on the site;to minimize grading,maximize solar access; to provide wildlife compliant fencing, and; to reduce night-time impacts from operations via restricted hours of operation, lighting control and security. 3.3.9-Economic Resources Policy "b"- A healthy, attractive business environment,appropriate to the area's character and resources should be fostered. Applicable Recommended Strategies: • Match the economy to the natural and built characteristics of Eagle County and ensure that it is of a scale and scope that best fits the environmental and social values. Staff Response: The proposal responds to policy decisions wherein marijuana cultivation was deemed to be generally appropriate for rural settings, specifically upon large acreage parcels, as long as the size, scale and scope of cultivation operations were vetted through the special use review process to meet specific standards, and therefore,to ensure compatibility with surrounding properties and uses. In this context, staff believes the proposal supports this strategy. • Encourage and help existing businesses to remain vigilant and adaptive to changing economic realities. Staff Response: TNT Ranch is an existing agricultural business;the Applicant has owned and fanned the ranch for the past 23 years. The proposed cultivation facility will support the existing ranch business. The facility responds to or "adapts"to changing economic realities related to the policy decision to allow for marijuana cultivation in the Resource Zone District and the creation a new industry. • Explore and pursue opportunities that diversify Eagle County's tax revenue streams. Staff Response: 36 01/06/2015 See above. Policy `j"- Agricultural land uses should be retained to preserve Eagle County's historical heritage and scenic quality for the benefit of future generations. Applicable Recommended Strategies: • Encourage and promote agricultural enterprises and activities. Staff Response: See above. • Encourage the maintenance of water rights on agricultural lands to ensure the long-term viability of agricultural uses. Staff Response: The proposal makes use of existing senior water rights. • Encourage best management practices for agricultural operations, and promote safe, effective, and sustainable agricultural techniques to minimize detrimental impacts on land, water and other components of the environment. Staff Response: The Applicant has designed the facility(as well as the operations plan)to ensure safe, effective and efficient agricultural practices through improved solar access, efficient water use,minimizing electrical use, and providing safe storage of soils and compost. Policy "n"- A sustainable job base and wage structure should be encouraged in Eagle County. Applicable Recommended Strategies • Promote and encourage more stable, long-term, year-round job opportunities that pay adequate wages relative to Eagle County's cost of living. Staff Response: See above. The proposal directly creates approximately 3 new local jobs and bolsters an existing, small business. 3.5.6-Infrastructure and Services Policy "e"- To preserve mountain character, county roads should be adequate and safe for their intended use, but not over-designed. Applicable Recommended Strategies: • So long as safety considerations are met, apply minimal road standards in outlying areas to preserve the county's agricultural heritage and rural mountain character. Staff Response: The subject property is served by Gypsum Creek Road, a publically maintained road.No additional improvements are proposed to, or required for,Gypsum Creek Road as a result of this proposal. • Assure adequate access for emergency responders. 37 01/06/2015 1 Staff Response: See above response. Staff believes that given the current condition and maintenance of Gypsum Creek Road,as well as the design of the facility(internal circulation,vehicle turn-around/hammerhead design, and the provision of dual access driveways), access and maneuverability will be adequate.The Gypsum Fire Protection District has reviewed the proposal, and has visited the site; the District has provided correspondence that they have no objection to the proposal as presented. Policy "i"- Exemplary emergency and community services should be available to all residents, visitors and second homeowners. Applicable Recommended Strategies: • Refer all development proposals to potentially affected emergency and service providers for comment. Staff Response: The proposal was referred to several emergency, service and law enforcement agencies and providers for comment. • Require demonstration that all new developments will be adequately served by emergency and community services. Staff Response: See above responses. 3.6.6-Water Resources Policy "a"- Protect the long-term viability of both ground and surface water sources. Applicable Recommended Strategies: • Require developers to demonstrate that a legal and physical water supply exists for their development. Staff Response: Staff believes the Applicant has provided adequate evidence to support the proposal in terms of water rights and water resource protection(ie. long-term viability). Staff is of the understanding that the Applicant has addressed the concerns of the State of Colorado Division of Water Resources and,therefore,has demonstrated that there will be legal,physical, adequate and dependable water supply for the cultivation facility, as well as for firefighting capacity. • Promote water conservation. Staff Response: The application summarizes how existing operations on the ranch, as well as proposed operations for cultivation, will include water conservation and(water)waste reduction. Policy "c"- Water conservation efforts by all water users in Eagle County should be implemented. Applicable Recommended Strategies: • Support the implementation of voluntary and mandatory water conservation measures. Staff Response: The Applicant is voluntarily(as a matter of best practices for this particular agricultural practice)proposing water conservation techniques and measures. 38 01/06/2015 Policy V"- Water quality in Eagle County should meet the highest applicable standards. Applicable Recommended Strategies: • Promote the appropriate best management practices for the control of stormwater runoff and work to identify and treat other non point sources of pollution. Staff Response: The application shows conceptual level plans for the facility. Final, detailed designs for grading, drainage and erosion control will be required with any building and/or grading permit application. Likewise,the application states that no hazardous(non-organic)pesticides, fungicides or fertilizers will be used; composting and soils storage will occur next to greenhouse. Policy "g"- Surface and groundwater supplies should be protected from agricultural, industrial and development related impacts. Applicable Recommended Strategies: • Require an effective water quality management plan be implemented with new development. Staff Response: See above responses. The Applicant has a long established, well documented track record of stewardship of the lands included within the TNT Ranch. Continuing his history of careful management of the Ranch, the Applicant intends to use organic fertilizers for propagation, and to have minimal storage of compost and soils piles that will be re-used in the operations. • Adhere to established Land Use Regulations, and implement appropriate water quality best management practices (BMPs) on all development proposals. Staff Response: Staff suggests the Applicant is already voluntarily employing BMPs in current agricultural practices, or has committed to using BMPs applicable to the marijuana cultivation industry. • Minimize the extent of impervious surfaces within new developments and encourage the use of pervious paving systems. Staff Response: The facility (fenced-in area surrounding the facility) totals approximately 1.5 acres of land disturbance; all final grades (areas for parking and areas surrounding greenhouse structures) will be gravel and, therefore, pervious to some degree. There is no paving proposed for the site. 3.7.6-Wildlife Policy "a"- The quality, integrity and interconnected nature of critical wildlife habitat in Eagle County should be preserved. Applicable Recommended Strategies: • Encourage owners of large land parcels to protect riparian areas and other identified wildlife habitat. Staff Response: 39 01/06/2015 The Applicant has demonstrated a commitment to the preservation of riparian and other sensitive lands within the 384 acre ranch property. Plans for the development of the greenhouse structures will ensure that disturbance is maintained outside the 75' stream setback area and the plans do not otherwise indicate any proposed areas of disturbance within riparian areas. Policy "d"- Development in areas critical to the continued well-being of Eagle County's wildlife populations should not be allowed. Applicable Recommended Strategies: • Direct development away from areas of critical wildlife habitat. Staff Response: No areas of"critical"wildlife habitat have been identified on or around the subject property. The CPW did not provide any referral comments or concerns. The proposal does limit disturbance to approximately.4%of the land area of this 384 acre parcel, almost exclusively in areas that have been used in agricultural production for many years, inclusive of grazing,use of machinery and the construction of typical accessory agricultural structures. Policy "e"- Where disturbances to wildlife habitat cannot be avoided, development should be required to fully mitigate potential negative impacts. Applicable Recommended Strategies: • Continue to refer development applications to the Colorado Division of Wildlife ("Colorado Parks and Wildlife Department'). Staff Response: The proposal was referred to CPW; no comments were received. • Implement and enforce referral recommendations of local wildlife officials. Staff Response: While the CPW did not respond,the Applicant has incorporated aspects of wildlife compliant design into the project such as fencing and trash storage. Policy 1-- Broad development patterns and the cumulative impacts of incremental development on wildlife habitat and wildlife populations should be accounted for in the decision making process. Applicable Recommended Strategies: • Guard against habitat fragmentation, and encourage development patterns that result in large, interconnected areas of natural open space. Staff Response: Given the nature of the proposal and the surrounding area, staff believes this strategy is met. The overall development footprint is approximately.4% of the total acreage of the subject property, with substantial areas of the subject parcel being preserved or maintained in agricultural use. Likewise, areas proposed for development of greenhouse structures are clustered within close proximity to existing, historic uses and structures on the property. Policy "g"- Wildlife friendly measures should be incorporated into the design of individual home sites and neighborhoods. Applicable Recommended Strategies: 40 01/06/2015 • Follow the recommendations provided by wildlife specialists and/or the Colorado Division of Wildlife for the development("Colorado Parks& Wildlife Department'). Staff Response: See above responses. 3.8.5- Sensitive Lands Policy "a"- Development should avoid areas of significant natural hazard. Applicable Recommended Strategies: • Utilize available hazard mapping, GIS mapping and other state-of-the-art analysis tools in the analysis of development proposals. Staff Response: The Applicant has provided a brief analysis of geologic hazard mapping, and staff is unaware of any other hazards (other than wildfire which has or will be mitigated through design). Policy "b"- The mitigation of natural hazards should be done in a manner that protects the integrity of the natural environment and the visual quality of the area. Applicable Recommended Strategies: • Minimize alteration of the natural landform by new development improvements to the greatest extent possible. Staff Response: See above responses. • Require a wildfire management plan for all new development. Staff Response: The Applicant has provided details for wildlife compliant fencing and trash storage/removal. Policy "c"- Development and development patterns should preserve landscapes that include visual, historic,and archeological value. Applicable Recommended Strategies: • Identify and inventory significant views, historic sites and structures, and archeological sites in Eagle County. Staff Response: This proposal was referred to the Colorado State Historical Society. Although there are structures on the property that are greater than 50 years old,the site has not been mapped. However,his does not mean that none exist. The Historical Society recommends contacting the state if any such resources are discovered during excavation'grading. 3.9.6-Environmental Quality Policy "a"- Air quality should meet the highest applicable safety standards, as well as the aesthetic expectations of local residents. • Set limits for construction site disturbance, require temporary re-vegetation of stockpiles, and permanent re-vegetation of all disturbed areas once final grades have been established. 41 01/06/2015 Staff Response: The plans include provisions for limiting site disturbance and providing for re-vegetative efforts following construction. Policy "b"- Lighting plans that reduce nuisance glare and protect the quality of the night sky should be encouraged. Applicable Recommended Strategies: • For commercial uses, require applications for commercial uses submit a lighting plan that conforms to applicable regulations. Staff Response: The Applicant will be required to provide lighting plans as part of any building permit submittal.The application states an intent to provide lighting for code compliance and, in certain instances, for security,which will be in compliance with the standards of Article 4, ECLURs. Specifically,the Applicant has represented that lighting will be dark sky compliant and will be kept to a minimum. There is a recommended condition of approval to this effect as well. STANDARD: Compatibility. [Section 5-250.B.2] The proposed Special Use shall be appropriate for its proposed location and compatible with the character of surrounding land uses. Potential Surrounumg Land Uses/Zoning, ' YeS 'No North: Residential/Ag. Resource(R) ✓ South: Residential/Ag.. Resource Residential/Ag.. ✓ East: Residential/Ag. Resource(R) ✓ West: Residential/Ag. Resource(R) ✓ Staff Response: The subject property shares a border with one rural, residential property to the northwest, and one privately owned, vacant parcel to the southeast. Other lands surrounding the subject property are public (United States Forest Service) lands. With regard to potential conflicts or compatibility issues, staff views the proposed Special Use as having minimal impacts on the surrounding area. The closest residence is approximately 500 feet away from the proposed greenhouse structures. Therefore, it is reasonable to view the proposal as having appropriate separation from neighboring properties/activities and the uses proposed are in general keeping with agricultural and natural resource extraction(pumice mine located to the southeast of the subject property) land uses in the surrounding area. STANDARD: Zone District Standards. [Section 5-250.B.3] The proposed Special Use shall comply with the standards of the zone district in which it is located and any standards applicable to the particular use, as identified in Section 3-310, Review Standards Applicable to Particular Residential, Agricultural and Resource Uses and Section 3-330, Review Standards Applicable to Particular Commercial and Industrial Uses. Staff Response: Staff believes this standard is met. Specifically, the proposal has been designed to comply with all applicable standards specific to marijuana cultivation: 1. Separation Requirements: separation distances of at least 200 feet have been met. The next closest residential structure/use(owned by the Applicant, but on a separate parcel) is approximately 500 feet away from the proposed cultivation facility. 42 01/06/2015 2. Minimum Lot Size: the parcel meets the minimum lot size(35 acres) for the Resource Zone District. 3. Parking and Storage: parking and storage have been designed to meet the standards. 4. Signs and Illumination: there are no signs proposed for the site or the operations and only minimal lighting is proposed for the exterior of buildings to comply with building code requirements. 5. Sales: no retail sales are proposed on or from the site. 6. Visual Screening: a fencing and conceptual screening/landscaping plan has been submitted which, if implemented correctly, should act to provide visual screening even though the site is not likely visible from public rights-of-way; the scale of the facility is appropriate in context to the character of the surrounding area. 7. Adequate Water: evidence of adequate water rights has been submitted. Staff is of the understanding that the Applicant has addressed the concerns of the State of Colorado Division of Water Resources and, therefore,has demonstrated that there will be legal, physical, adequate and dependable water supply for the cultivation facility. 8. Wildfire Hazard: the Applicant has met with the Eagle County Wildfire Mitigation Specialist and has received a wildfire rating of"low". 9. Access: legal access is provided via Gypsum Creek Road. While details have been provided regarding the limited nature of vehicle trips to and from the site by employees and delivery vehicles, staff suggests that additional details regarding the"maximum number of deliveries allowed per month" and the times of such deliveries could be added to enhance the operations plan for the facility. 10. Odor Mitigation Plan: at this time, due primarily to the location of this marijuana business, and the resultant proximity (distances) to other residential or agricultural uses, staff has not required an Odor Mitigation Plan for the project. However, the Applicant has indicated that mitigation such as carbon filtration systems could be installed within each greenhouse structure if needed in the future. Such systems are typical of most cultivation operations currently licensed in Eagle County (all of which are within commercially zoned areas of the county). 11. Security: although the Applicant has provided details regarding proposed security (cameras and lighting) on the site,all security requirements are a matter of State review and permitting. SECTION 3-310.REVIEW STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO PARTICULAR RESIDENTIAL,AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE USES STANDARD: Design Minimizes Adverse Impact. [Section 5-250.B.4J The design of the proposed Special Use shall minimize adverse impacts, including visual impact of the proposed use on adjacent lands;furthermore, the proposed Special Use shall avoid significant adverse impact on surrounding lands regarding trash, traffic, service delivery,parking and loading, odors, noise, glare, and vibration, and shall not create a nuisance. Staff Response: Staff believes this standard is met due to the distance of the facility from any surrounding (existing or future) residential structures, as well as the operational planning and mitigation efforts proposed by the Applicant. Specifically, staff is not aware of or anticipating any permanent or persistent noise, glare or vibrations that will be generated from the installation of the cultivation facility. According to the application and representations made by the Applicant, the facility will have minimal traffic coming to and from the site; night-time lighting for growing operations will be minimal and will be screened, and; staff is not aware of any operations, other than normal agricultural activities such as unloading occasional deliveries and/or using machinery to move/manage soils and compost piles,that will produce noise. Additionally, the project's distance from adjoining properties and any future 43 01/06/2015 residential improvements on those (currently vacant) properties is advantageous and should work to eliminate or mitigate any potential impacts. STANDARD: Design Minimizes Environmental Impact. [Section 5-250.B.5] The proposed Special Use shall minimize environmental impacts and shall not cause significant deterioration of water and air resources, wildlife habitat, scenic resources, and other natural resources. Staff Response: Staff believes the proposal meets this standard, although there will be some impacts. Specifically, the proposed use will affect the biotic community by removing approximately 1.5 acres existing vegetation (grasses and alfalfa). Therefore, wildlife habitat may also be affected. However, total disturbance (.4% of the total acreage of the parcel) represents a comparably small development footprint in comparison to other potential `by right' uses that could otherwise occur on the subject property; there is no limit on the area of the lot that could otherwise be covered by a home, accessory dwelling units,barns and accessory agricultural structures. The cultivation facility will most likely not be highly visible from Gypsum Creek Road, but most likely will be visible from some vantage points on adjacent properties. It is difficult to judge the total impact or effect on the visual resources of the area, despite the use of visual simulation techniques and renderings provided by the Applicant. And, when viewed in context to the visual quality of surrounding development in the area (Farmsteads, single-family home properties,vacant lands), it could be argued the proposed use has been designed to complement typical agricultural architectural character found in the area. Therefore, staff believes the proposal will not significantly degrade the existing visual resources of the area, and that the proposed use and design is complimentary to the rural, agricultural character of the area. STANDARD: Impact on Public Facilities. [Section 5-250.B.6] The proposed Special Use Permit shall be adequately served by public facilities and services, including roads, pedestrian paths, potable water and wastewater facilities,parks, schools,police and fire protection, and emergency medical services. Staff Response: Staff believes the proposal meets this standard. Specifically, the subject property is located in a rather remote, rural portion of unincorporated Eagle County. As such, and given the nature of the proposed use (private agricultural enterprise), staff suggests that very few "public facilities" will be impacted or necessary, with the exception of roads, fire protection, and emergency medical services. While the site is accessed by way of publically maintained roads, the operational plan for the cultivation facility should result in minimal traffic being added to local roads,public or private. STANDARD: Site Development Standards. [Section 5-250.B.7] The proposed Special Use shall comply with the appropriate standards in Article 4, Site Development Standards. t ✓ t, ",a�+ S a �'r; q4 ° as r i y E E ail v t +tD ,-04? �_ , ,. +j,�i A".. 'k .z tai .t y � r 3 t"3. X Off-Street Parking and Loading Standards(Division 4-1) X Landscaping and Illumination Standards(Division 4-2) 2 X Sign Regulations(Division 4-3) X Wildlife Protection(Section 4-410) X Geologic Hazards(Section 4-420) X Hillside Development(Section 4-425) 44 01/06/2015 X Wildfire Protection(Section 4-430) X Wood Burning Controls(Section 4-440) X Ridgeline Protection(Section 4-450) X Environmental Impact Report(Section 4-460) X Commercial and Industrial Performance Standards(Division 4-5) X Noise and Vibration(Section 4-520) X Smoke and Particulates(Section 4-530) X Heat,Glare,Radiation and Electrical Interference(Section 4-540) X Storage of Hazardous and Non-hazardous Materials(Section 4-550) X Water Quality Standards(Section 4-560) X Roadway Standards(Section 4-620) X Sidewalk and Trail Standards(Section 4-630) X Irrigation System Standards(Section 4-640) X Drainage Standards(Section 4-650) 6 X Grading and Erosion Control Standards(Section 4-660) 6 X Utility and Lighting Standards(Section 4-670) 2 X Water Supply Standards(Section 4-680)* X Sanitary Sewage Disposal Standards(Section 4-690) X Impact Fees and Land Dedication Standards(Division 4-7) Staff Response: Staff believes the application is compliant, or substantially compliant, with the majority of applicable Site Development Standards. In this instances where a standard has been indicated as NOT satisfying a particular standard, staff has referenced a condition of approval meant to mitigate non-compliance, or otherwise cause the proposal to achieve a higher level of compliance. STANDARD: Other Provisions. [Section 5-250.B.8J The proposed Special Use shall comply with all standards imposed on it by all other applicable provisions of these Land Use Regulations for use, layout, and general development characteristics. Staff Response: The only "other provisions" would be those standards specific to marijuana cultivation, manufacturing, or testing listed in Section 3-310,F.f. As noted elsewhere in this report, staff believes the proposal meets or exceeds each of the required standards of Section 3-310,F.f. DISCUSSION: Mr. Hunn presented the request. The applicant was requesting a Special Use Permit for a marijuana cultivation facility consisting of 4-6 greenhouse structures and the use of an existing barn for storage,packing and drying. The applicant may be interested in the manufacturing of infused products in the future. Historically the property had been used for agriculture. The lower bench of the property would be where the cultivation activities would be located and the upper bench would be used for the outdoor cultivation. He reviewed the standards.The Planning Commission reviewed the proposal and voted 6-1 to recommend approval,with conditions. Their main concern was night time lighting,hours of operation, and emergency response plan. The security would be monitored 24/7. The division of water recourses expressed no concern with the proposal. The Gypsum Fire 45 01/06/2015 Protection District(GFPD) supported the request with the condition that required the applicant to coordinate during the building permit review with both the Eagle County Building Division and the Gypsum Fire District, condition seven(7). The applicant had the ability to address the Engineering Department's concern regarding the road setback. He added a couple additional conditions to address the Planning Commission's concerns. Staff believed that the proposal addressed a majority of applicable Master Plan goals. He spoke about the letter and phone call he received from the adjacent property owner. Their primary concerns were with how the business would impact property values,risk from a security standpoint,use of fertilizers and any potential impacts to Gypsum Creek, future extraction activities, and overall impact on the character of the area. Staff had worked with the property owner for months and believed the application met all applicable standards for Special Use Review and the Comprehensive Plan. Overall the applicant had done a good job of responding to some of the concerns. While there were some impacts there were some tradeoffs. The county had made the determination that cultivation in rural districts was appropriate if the standards were met and it was staff's opinion the applicant provided ample evidence that the standards are, or could be met. He presented the nine(9)proposed conditions. Chairman Ryan commented on condition eight(8). Because the business appeared to be small operation in a rural location she wondered if it was an onerous requirement. Mr. Hunn spoke about the condition that responded to marijuana extraction(manufacturing).The condition was an attempt to include the use and require the applicant to act on it with the three year vesting period. The applicant was not proposing extraction at this time but they wanted to do extraction they just didn't know when. The applicant would be required to apply for a building permit for the extraction activity. Chris Green stated that the extraction devise was expensive and the three year vesting period would allow some flexibility. Ms. Ayres-Oliver believed the extraction process was a different use. Mr.Hunn stated that the applicant could certainly request an extension after the three years which was an administrative process. Mr. Trotter stated that the extraction equipment was costly. He hoped to grow the business incrementally, not leap to far too fast. Ms.Ayres—Oliver believed the board had the ability to approve some of the uses,all or none of the uses. She looked at the uses as separate. It was one Special Use Permit that covered several different uses. Chris Green presented the applicants request. The intent was to pursue the medical cannabis industry. The industry was governed by state statutes. Cannabis cultivation in agricultural zoning was appropriate with special review per Eagle County. The applicant worked with the county,water commissioner,and the Fire Department. The property owner has lived on the land for over 20 years. This was an organic sustainable ranch, off grid. Mr. Trotter was a local real estate business man and had a good standing in the community. The ranch was located up Gypsum Creek road approximately 11 from the town of Gypsum. There were no sensitive areas or uses within the area. The ranch was 383 acres and the proposal used less than 1%of the site. The proposal complied with the agricultural and resource zoning of Eagle County. They had adequate fire protection. All of the power came from a hydro plant on the property. The applicant believed this was an appropriately scaled cultivation facility. They would employ three persons. They were using historically documented in basin surface and storage water rights that had been used since 1894 on the property. The process would be energy efficient,use organic soils conservation practices, and would be an overall organic operation. There would be minimum impact to traffic. Artificial lighting would only be used in the greenhouses when natural lighting didn't provide enough light to operate. The earth berming would prevent light trespass. Chairman Ryan wondered about the upper bench of the property and whether lights could affect the adjacent property. Mr. Green stated that upper bench was about 120 feet above the road.The intent was to shine the lights internally. Lights would be off at 7:00 pm at the latest. The plants would be harvested on the upper bench and processed for shipment. Owner vehicles, employee vehicles or small delivery vehicles would be used for shipping. There would be no semis. Security was governed per Colorado State Statute and it was heavily regulated. There would be 2-3 cameras placed on Gypsum Creek Road. The fencing would be eight(8) feet high around entire perimeter. The applicant believed they were being good stewards'of the land and the proposal was appropriate for the area. Commissioner Chandler-Henry wondered if there were any impacts to birds eating marijuana. Mr. Trotter stated that if an animal ate marijuana they would not get stoned or be impacted. Commissioner Chandler-Henry asked about the outside lighting. Mr. Green stated that any lights outside the greenhouses would be dark sky compliant. 46 01/06/2015 Commissioner Chandler-Henry asked about the traffic count. Mr. Schroeder stated that the traffic would be minimum,no more than 10 vehicles per day. Commissioner Chandler-Henry asked about the 75 ft. stream setback. Mr. Schroeder stated that there was currently an access road that went through the stream setback. One of the options would be going through the fonsi process (finding of no significant impact) since the access was already there or they could push the greenhouses further to the east. Commissioner Chandler-Henry wondered how that would be followed up on since there were was not a condition addressing this issue. Mr. Schroeder stated that a condition could be added. Commissioner Chandler-Henry asked about the use of fertilizers. Mr.Trotter stated that they would not use chemical fertilizers or pesticides as he ran a cattle ranch and could recycle his manure into organic fertilizer. Commissioner Chandler-Henry didn't believe a separate condition was necessary for the extraction process. Ms.Ayres-Oliver asked if the manufacturing side of things be part of the cultivation facility. Mr.Trotter stated there the manufacturing would require a separate facility for hygiene purposes. Chairman Ryan stated the board attended a site visit. She understood that the proposal could make some people uneasy in terms of the stigma attached to marijuana. She believed the grow operation could not be seen from the road. She wondered if requiring the applicant to provide an operation plan detailing the hours of operation was onerous. She wanted to honor the Planning Commission recommendations but wondered the impact it would have on the applicant. Mr. Trotter stated that as a rancher he works all hours of the day. Mr. Green believed it was difficult to describe an agricultural operations plan. Commissioner Chandler-Henry agreed with Chairman Ryan and didn't feel like a necessary condition as long as it remained an agricultural operation. Lighting was an issue but was addressed elsewhere. Mr.Hunn crafted some language that addressed the 75 ft. steam set back. Commissioner Chandler-Henry thanked the applicants for the site visit and all the work and appreciated all the attention to detail. The board's role was to protect land in the county and follow the land use codes and comprehensive plan. She believed this was an agricultural use and was appropriate to grow plants outside. Staff did an exceptional job. She was prepared to vote yes on the file with the conditions proposed by staff. Chairman Ryan believed the proposal was appropriately scaled and maintained the rural character of the area. She believed it was important to treat the proposal as an agricultural use. Chairman Ryan opened and closed public input, as there was none. Commissioner Chandler-Henry moved to approve file no. ZS-5032 TNT Ranch Botanicals Marijuana Cultivation,with the conditions proposed by staff. Chairman Ryan seconded the motion. Of the two voting Commissioners,the vote was declared unanimous. ttAtz c, There being no further business b:. oR': ? � , e meeting ' as adjourned until January 3, 2015 Tit tvid: Attest: ILL t 1 1.� i o * cocoaP9� /I�l/� AI J A !/ ILA / Clerk to the Board Chairma 4 .� 02%1: C l( u►w 47 01/06/2015